Abstract
Urban forests contribute greatly to the conservation of biodiversity and are able to store carbon in the same way as other forest ecosystems. This research investigated the diversity, volume yield, biomass and carbon sequestration of tree species in urban forests in two Nigerian cities (Port Harcourt and Ilorin) selected using simple random sampling. In Nigeria there is no record of quantitative assessment of carbon sequestration in urban forests. Biodiversity and growth data were obtained from about 20% of the built-up areas of the two cities. Non-destructive approach was used for above ground biomass estimation. Biomass data was used to quantify carbon stock to estimate the amount of carbon sequestrated by the urban forests in the two cities. The results revealed a total of 746 individual trees distributed among 37 species and 19 families in Port Harcourt, while 556 individual trees distributed among 46 species and 18 families in Ilorin urban forest. Shannon-Wiener diversity index for Port Harcourt was 3.39 while that of Ilorin was 3.61. The total carbon stored by the urban forest of Port Harcourt was estimated at 67,979.08 tons and Ilorin urban forest carbon stored was estimated at 91,512.49 tons. The average carbon density of the urban forest of Port Harcourt was estimated at 136.15 tons/ha and 7.82 tons/ha was estimated for Ilorin urban forest. Tree species diversity has greater impact on biomass accumulation which determines carbon sequestration and mitigation of harsh climatic conditions. Selection and planting the right species as avenue trees, building parks and gardens, urban landscaping can improve urban forest carbon sequestration and producing other urban forest ecosystem functions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The impact of urbanization on the environment, species diversity and conservation can be positive or negative on the global climate (Golubiewski 2006). Urban forest is an integral component of the forest ecosystem which could generate significant ecosystem services such as offsetting carbon emission, removing air pollutants, regulating the micro environment and mitigating climate change (Fuwape and Onyekwelu 2011; Konijnendijk et al. 2006). Urban forest represents a valuable component of the vegetation cover of urban environment. Ecosystem services are the benefits people obtain from ecosystems within their immediate environment. These include provision of food; water; regulating environmental temperature and climate change; reduction of flood and disease control; recreational and amusement parks; and nutrient cycling, which contribute to maintaining the conditions of life on earth (Adekunle et al. 2013; Banda et al. 2006; McHale et al. 2009). These ecosystem services contribute significantly to improving environmental quality and quality of life, beautification and sustainable urban development.
Sustainable conservation and management of urban forest requires a basic understanding of the spatial and temporal ranges of the vegetation cover with the understanding of the principal factors that govern species distribution and survival (Banda et al. 2006; Onyekwelu et al. 2008). Forest degradation, as a result of indiscriminate exploitation, massive conversion of forested land to other land uses (especially infrastructural development), has negative impacts on biological diversity conservation, soil properties, forest yield and the environment (Miles et al. 2006; Salunkhei et al. 2016). Researches indicated that cities in developing countries contribute greatly to global greenhouse gas emissions (Gibbs et al. 2007; Pan et al. 2011; Saatchi et al. 2011). As a result of inadequate planning of urban green infrastructures, many urban centres are confronted with the challenges of environmental degradation.
Research workers have indicated that urban forests have the ability to store carbon like other forest ecosystems (McPherson 1998; Pataki et al. 2006). There are difficulties in sampling and measuring urban tree parameters used in volume and biomass estimations (Mcpherson and Simpson 2001; Pataki et al. 2006).
The quantity of carbon stored in trees is determined by the quantity of biomass accumulated by the tree (Brown 1997; Zhou and Hemstrom 2009; Chandra et al. 2011; Azyleah et al. 2014). Carbon sequestration is the net removal of CO2 from the atmosphere, which includes the uptake of carbon from atmosphere by all chlorophyllous plants through photosynthesis. Forested lands are richer in carbon per unit area than any other land-use type (Hossain et al. 2013). Tree diameter at breast height (dbh) is the commonly used parameter for estimation of carbon stocks through the calculation of Above Ground Biomass (AGB) (Brown 1997; Chave et al. 2005; Komiyama et al. 2008; Ketterings et al. 2001). The present study was carried out to investigate tree species diversity status, estimate volume yield and biomass accumulation of urban forests in two vegetation zones of Nigeria. Therefore, this research addresses these two research questions: 1. What are the contributions of urban forest in supporting tree species diversity in the two Nigerian cities? 2. What is the carbon storage potential of the urban forest in the two Nigerian cities?
Materials and methods
Study area
This study for biomass estimation, volume yield and tree species diversity was limited to urban forests in two major cities located within two vegetation zones of Nigeria. Simple random sampling design was used to select the two cities (Port Harcourt and Ilorin) for this study. Port Harcourt is situated between coordinates 04°46′82”N - 04°54′17”N and 06°58′23″E - 07°02′31″E, with mean annual rainfall of 2708 mm, average annual temperature of 26.4 °C (Fig. 1). Port Harcourt is located within the rainforest ecological zone of Nigeria. The vegetation cover of this city is very rich and diverse due to the favourable climatic conditions, altitude and ecological habitats existing within tropical forest ecosystems of the country. Port Harcourt is the capital and largest city in River State as well as the 5th largest city by population in Nigeria. It lies along Bonny River, located in the Niger Delta and South-South region of Nigeria. It has an estimated population of 1,148,665. Floristic structure, diversity and biomass estimation data were conducted in the 20% urban forests sites of Port Harcourt metropolis covering about 2496.4 ha. The selected sections of the city are the cores of the city centres. The Government of Rivers State’s aim of forest conservation activities in these areas is to plant exotic tree species and to preserve indigenous tree species for beautification purposes.
Ilorin is situated within the 08°26′237”N - 08°31′267”N and 04°30′02″E - 04°33′77″E co-ordinates, with a mean annual rainfall of 1217 mm, average annual temperature of 27.2 °C. The city is located within the ecological region of Nigeria’s Guinea savanna. Ilorin is the capital of the state of Kwara in Nigeria’s north-central region and the 11th largest population city in Nigeria. Ilorin has a population projection of 814,192. The data for this analysis were obtained from the central district of Ilorin covering approximately 11,704.5 ha and comprising approximately 20% of urban forests. This portion of the city’s core area, with activities of forest management ranges from home gardens and government reserves that enhanced city greening.
Data collection
Tree inventory was conducted between February and October 2017 to collect the data for this analysis. The main streets in Port Harcourt were chosen for inventory data collection in various sections of the city (Mgbuoba, Rumuadaolu, Rumuogba, Rumuomasi, Rumuokoro, Rumuodara, Ogbunabali, Government House, and Rumuola). The data for Ilorin were collected from Ilorin central district (Taiwo road, Offa road, Ahmadu Bello Avenue, Fade, Tonke, Muritala Mohammed road, Kwara Polytechnic campus and University of Ilorin campus). All woody plants along the streets in the selected city section with diameter at breast height (dbh) of 10 cm and above as suggested by Hall et al. (2003) were measured and identified. The following tree data were collected; diameter at breast height using girth tape, diameters over bark at the base, middle, merchantable height and total height using a Spiegel Relaskop (Cottam and Curtis 1956; Kaye et al. 2005; Onyekwelu and Olusola 2014). Forked trees were assessed as separate trees beneath the breast-height level. All species of tree have been classified with their botanical names and distributed to their respective families.
Data computation and analysis
The volume of each tree was computed using Newton’s formula (Husch et al. 2003), eq. 1. Total volume for each species was obtained by adding the volume of individual trees of the species in the sampled areas of each city.
where: V = Tree volume (m3), Db, Dm and Dt = tree cross-sectional area (m2) at the base, middle and top of merchantable height, respectively, and h = total height (in meters).
Data for urban forest tree species were analyzed for relative frequency, relative dominance and relative density while the sum of values for these parameters represented importance value index (IVI) for various species (Kershaw 1973). Species diversity was calculated using Shannon and Wiener formula (Motz et al. 2010; Chandrashekara and Sankar 1998) eq. 2.
Where Η' is the Shannon-Wiener diversity index, S in the total number of species in the community; Pi is the proportion of S made up of the ith species and in natural logarithm.
Above-Ground Biomass (AGB) was estimated using equation (eq. 3) developed by Brown (1997) for biomass estimation in tropical forests, the equation has been used by some research workers in the determination of carbon storage for some developing countries (Baccini et al. 2008; NIACS 2008; McHale et al. 2009; Kridiborworn et al. 2012; Salunkhei et al. 2016; Adekunle et al. 2014; Woldegerima et al. 2017).
where: AGB = Biomass per tree (kg) and D = dbh (cm).
Woldegerima et al. (2017) stated that it was possible to determine below ground biomass (BGB) by multiplying the above ground biomass by a factor of 0.2 based on the relationship between tree root and tree stem (Cairns et al. 1997; Brown 2002), as applied in this research. The amount of carbon stock in urban forest for each city was calculated by using the Pearson et al. (2005); Tang et al. (2016) formula (Carbon Stock = aboveground biomass + belowground biomass).
Results
Species abundance and structure of the urban forests
Tables 1 and 2 present analyzes of the diversity of tree species and the structural characteristics of urban forests. A total of 746 and 556 individual trees (dbh ≥ 10 cm) were recorded within the sampled areas in Port Harcourt and Ilorin, respectively. These were distributed among 37 species in Port Harcourt and 19 families, 46 species in Ilorin and 18 families. The highest relative abundance of species in Port Harcourt was recorded for Terminalia mantaly (15.01%) followed by Delonix regia (7.51%), with Bombax buonopozense reporting the lowest relative abundance of species (Fig. 2). In the Ilorin urban forest Azadirachta indica (7.91%) and Polyalthia longifolia had the highest number (7.91%), while Albizia lebbeck reported the lowest relative abundance (0.36%) (Fig. 3). The highest volume of species reported at Port Harcourt was Gmelina arborea and Avicennia nitida (127.84 m3 and 76.77 m3) while Antiaris Africana (0.06) was the lowest volume yield.
The highest volume of Gmelina arborea and Polyalthia longifolia (105,68 m3 and 74,53 m3 respectively) was obtained from Dalbergia latifolia (0,12 m3) in urban forests of Ilorin. The Family Importance Value (FIV) for the urban forests analysis is provided in Tables 3 and 4. In Port Harcourt, the Moraceae family had the highest FIV (17.35%) followed by the Euphorbiaceae family (11.22%) while the Cupressaceae family gave the lowest FIV (1.45%). The Fabaceae family also had the highest FIV (30.74%), followed by the Myrtaceae family (8.37%), while the lowest FIV was reported for Sapotaceae.
Biodiversity indices and tree growth variables
Biodiversity indices and tree growth variables for urban forests in the two cities were calculated and presented in Table 5. The Shannon-Wiener diversity index computed for Port Harcourt was 3.39 while that of Ilorin was 3.61. The result of Pielou’s evenness index was 0.54 and 0.55 for Port Harcourt and Ilorin, respectively. The summary of tree growth variables showed that the total basal area for Port Harcourt was 16.39 m2 while the total volume for trees for the selected city segment was 409.78 m3. In the urban forest of Ilorin, 22,21 m2 was calculated as the total basal area while in the selected city portion the total volume for trees was 745,44 m3.
The tree diameter distribution in both cities showed the presence of the highest number of individual trees in the small diameter class (10–60 cm), while in Ilorin the lowest number of trees occurred in the 61–100 cm diameter class (Table 6). In Port Harcourt, the highest number of trees was found in the 10–30 cm diameter class whereas the lowest number of trees was found in the 91–100 cm diameter range. In the diameter class of 91–100 cm, the highest basal area of 7.17 m2 occurred while the highest volume of 230.91 m3 occurred in the diameter class of 51–60 cm for trees in Ilorin metropolis. The same pattern was observed in Port Harcourt with the 91–100 cm diameter class having the highest basal area of 4.31 m2 while the 61–70 cm diameter class had the lowest 146.84 m3 volume.
The distribution of the height class suggested the physiognomy of the urban forests, shown by the vertical structure and distribution of tree heights (Table 7). The height range of 10.01–15.00 m in Port Harcourt metropolis had a total number of 606 individual trees, a cumulative basal area of 9.17 m2 and a cumulative volume of 335.37 m3. Similarly, the largest number of individual trees (298 stem), cumulative basal area (12.47 m2), and cumulative volume (361.88 m3) in Ilorin metropolis were in the height range of 10.01–15.00 m. It was observed that the highest concentration of different tree species (22) and family (16) occurred in the 10.01–15.00 m height class in Port Harcourt while the highest concentration of tree species (26) and family (12) occurred in the 10.01–15.00 m height class at Ilorin.
Biomass and carbon stock estimation
The total accumulation of biomass for trees in Port Harcourt was estimated at 67,979.08 tons while 91,512.49 tons were calculated for Ilorin (Tables 8 and 9). The overall biomass differed considerably between species of one tree and another. Figures 4 and 5 show the ten organisms selected for this analysis with the highest accumulation of biomass in the two cities. The species with the highest accumulation of biomass in Port Harcourt was Hevea brasiliensis (6686.38 tons) followed by Anacardium occidentale (6257.61 tons) while the Eucalyptus camaldulensis (35.03 tons) had the lowest accumulation of biomass in the city. At Ilorin Hura crepitans had the highest biomass (6455.93 tons), followed by Albizia lebbeck (6398.95 tons) and Plumera rubra had the lowest biomass (50.24 tons) (Table 9). The result showed that carbon storage differed between the two cities. The total carbon stored in Port Harcourt by trees was estimated at 67,979.08 tons and the carbon stored in Ilorin urban forest was estimated at 91,512.49 tons. Port Harcourt’s average carbon density of trees was estimated at 136.15 tons / ha while Ilorin was estimated at 7.82 tons / ha for trees.
Discussion
The results of the assessment of urban forest tree species showed that both indigenous and exotic hardwood species were present in the two Nigerian cities. Trees offer ecological services and enhance the harsh environmental conditions connected to urban centres. The findings of the assessment of urban forests on tree diversity, volume yield and carbon storage have shown that the two Nigerian cities have the capacity to provide ecosystem services as other tropical forest reserves provide ecosystem services to the population. Tree species that were found in the two cities belong to both indigenous and exotic tropical hard wood tree species.
Tree species diversity and Phytosociological characteristics
The number of tree species recorded from the two Nigerian cities (Port Harcourt and Ilorin) is much less than the number of species recorded in Nigeria for other natural forest reserves. Lawal and Adekunle (2013) finding showed that 406/ha species for Strict Nature reserve of Akure and Adekunle et al. (2014) research indicated that 500/ha species from Eda protected forest all in the rainforest vegetation zone of Nigeria. These two urban forests belong to different vegetation zones of Nigeria Port Harcourt in the Rainforest and Ilorin in the Guinea savanna zone. The tree species composition in these cities could be attributed to the nature of the vegetation zones and the climatic conditions of the cities. These urban forests act as biodiversity reserves and provide ecological services (such as enhancing harsh environmental conditions connected to urban centres). It has been reported that volume estimation is the determinant of the tree growth structure and is the most important parameter for forest management (Adekunle 2006; Tonolli et al. 2011; Adekunle et al. 2013). The estimated volume for this study was 409.8 m3 for urban forests in Port Harcourt and 745.4 m3 for urban forests in Ilorin, which was very small compared to similar studies in protected forests. Adekunle et al. (2013) estimated volume of 387 m3/ha for Akure strict Nature Reserve, Adekunle et al. (2014) estimated volume of 287.49 m3/ha for Eda protected forest, Wittmann et al. (2008) estimated volume of 259.45 m3/ha for Southern Pantanal, Brazil. The sharp variation in the values recorded for this study could be attributed to tree species density. Banda et al. (2006) and Munishi et al. (2011) found that, management activites had significant influence on plant species abundance and the volume yield.
Urban forest trees composition and diversity
The estimated diversity of Shannon-Wiener for this analysis was H′ = 3.39 for the urban forest of Port Harcourt and H′ = 3.39 for the urban forest of Ilorin, close to the estimated diversity for some protected forests in Nigeria. Adekunle et al. (2013) estimated 3.74 Shannon-diversity for Akure strict Nature Reserve, 2.12 for Eda protected forest, Agbelade et al. (2016) estimated 3.08 Shannon-diversity for Minna urban forest, and Agbelade et al. (2017) estimated 3.56 Shannon-diversity for Abuja urban forest. The higher diversity values measured for these two urban forests reflect the planning and management that the Ministry of Environment and Government has placed in place to boost the city’s greeness cover. The higher species diversity is expected to promote ecosystem services and animal protection policies to boost the population in these cities. Forest habitats play an important role in the functioning of the biosphere, in relation to the conservation of plant gene bank (EU 2008). Urban forests will make an enormous contribution to the protection of biodiversity and could function as bio-resources if effective management and planning was implemented. Species diversity and richness is an important attribute of a forest community that influences the functioning of an ecosystem which satisfy human needs (Magurran 2004; Salunkhei et al. 2016; Onyekwelu et al. 2008).
Carbon storage capacity of these urban forests
The carbon sequestration in the study areas varied with the vegetation zones and climatic conditions of these locations 136.15 tons/ha and 7.82 tons/ha in urban forests of Port Harcourt and Ilorin respectively. The carbon storage of the urban forest of Port Harcourt (rainforest) is comparable to similar study conducted in the same vegetation zone Nigeria 156.73 tons/ha for Eda protected forest Adekunle et al. (2014). The carbon storage of Ilorin urban forest in Nigeria is less than the studies conducted in protected forest in Nigeria 156.73 tons/ha for Eda protected forest Adekunle et al. (2014), urban forest of Shenyang, China (Liu and Li 2012) and 172 ton/ha for urban forest of Addis Ababa. The carbon content of trees in urban areas in this study is an indication that the conservation of biodiversity in urban areas could contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emission reduction. The carbon storage estimated for this study demonstrated the level of variability of carbon sequestration that could exist within different urban centres in different vegetation zones. The variation in these values may not only depend on species, climatic condition, anthropogenic disturbances but also could be attributed to model used in estimating biomass and sampling intensity. The amount of carbon stored by Port Harcourt is encouraging to further conserve and manage the present urban forest structure. The carbon stored by Ilorin urban forest is highly disturbing which could be due to deforestation of urban trees without replacement and climatic conditions of the location that can increase the carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. Therefore, selecting and planting the right species as avenue trees, building parks and gardens, inclusion of tree in urban landscaping can improve urban forest carbon sequestration and producing other urban forest ecosystem functions (Day et al. 2013; Ramachandran et al. 2007; Sitoe et al. 2014; Woldegerima et al. 2017).
Conclusion
This study has demonstrated that the urban forest of Port Harcourt and Ilorin needs urgent attention due to the rate of exposure of the urban forest to degradation, low conservation and management. Improvement of the management strategies of these urban forests would increase tree species diversity, volume yield and carbon storage potential thereby performing their ecosystems functions. The low estimated carbon storage values for this study could be as results of indiscriminate, unconcern attitude of both the Government and the citizen alike. Deforestation within the urban forests would reduce the level of ecosystems functions and services to the environment. In addition to the opportunity of carbon storage in urban forests, there are arrays of other ecosystem services and ecological functions of urban forests that could be beneficial to urban populace. The results of this study showed the importance of forests in urban settlement and how the urban forests has been exposed to high level of degradation which had made the cities to be prone to different environmental hazards. However, there are different challenges in Nigerian cities in balancing forest conservation with infrastructural development with urban livelihood improvement. These challenges can be better solved by applying institutional frameworks that are geared toward increasing the awareness of the importance of urban forests. High amount of carbon dioxide is removed from environment by trees annually and are stored as carbon in plant biomass. These low values of tree volume and carbon storage should awaken urban forest managers and policy makers to strategize ways by which silvicultural activities could be on the increase in these Nigerian cities.
References
Adekunle VAJ (2006) Conservation of tree species diversity in tropical rainforest ecosystem of Southwest Nigeria. J Trop For Sci 18(2):91–101
Adekunle VAJ, Olagoke AO, Akindele SO (2013) Tree species diversity and structure of a Nigerian strict nature reserve. Trop Ecol 54(3):275–289
Adekunle VAJ, Nair NK, Srivastava AK, Singh NK (2014) Volume yield, tree species diversity and carbon hoard in protected areas of two developing countries. For Sci Technol 10(2):89–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2013.860050
Agbelade AD, Onyekwelu JC, Oyun MB (2016) Tree Species Diversity and their Benefits in Urban and Peri-urban areas of Abuja and Minna, Nigeria. Applied Tropical Agriculture 21(3):27–36
Agbelade AD, Onyekwelu JC, Oyun MB (2017) Tree species richness, diversity, and vegetation index for Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria. Int J Forestry Res Vol 4549756:12
Azyleah CA, Jose Alan AC, Young JL (2014) Assessment of species diversity, biomass and carbon sequestration potential of a natural mangrove stand in Samar, the Philippines. For Sci Technol 10(1):2–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2013.814593
Baccini A, Laporte N, Goetz SJ, Sun M, Huang D (2008) A first map of tropical Africa’s above-ground biomass derived from satellite imagery. Environ Res Lett 3:045011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045011
Banda T, Schwartz MW, Caro T (2006) Woody vegetation structure and composition along a protection gradient in a Miombo ecosystem of Western Tanzania. For Ecol Manag 230:179–185
Brown, S. 1997. Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: A primer. UN FAO forestry paper 134. Food and agriculture organization; Rome, Italy 19 pp.
Chandrashekara UM, Sankar S (1998) Ecology and management of sacred groves in Kerala, India. For Ecol Manag 112:165–177
Brown S (2002) Measuring carbon in forest: current status and future challenges. Environ Pollut 116:363–372
Cairns Ma, Brown S, Helmer Eh, Baumgardner Ga (1997) Root biomass allocation in the world’s upland forest. Oecologia 111:–11
Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S, Cairns MA, Chamber JQ, Eamus D, Fölster H, Fromard F, Higuchi N, Kira T, Lescure JP, Nelson BW, Ogawa H, Puig H, Ríera B, Yamakura T (2005) Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 145:87–99
Chandra IA, Seca G, Hena MKA (2011) Aboveground biomass production of Rhizophora apiculata Blume in Sarawak mangrove Forest. Am J Agric Biol Sci 6(4):469–474
Cottam G, Curtis JT (1956) The use of distance measures in phytosociological sampling. Ecology 37(3):451–460. https://doi.org/10.2307/1930167
Day M, Baldauf C, Rutishauser E, Sunderland DTH (2013) Relationship between tree species diversity and above-ground biomass in central African rainforests: implications for REDD. Environ Conserv 41(1):64–72pp. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892913000295
Eu (European Union) 2008. Forest biodiversity as a challenge and opportunity for climate change adaptation and mitigation, Presidency background paper presented at the Informal Meeting of EU Environment Ministers, 11–13 April 2008, Ljubljana/Brdo, 12pp
Fuwape JA, Onyekwelu JC (2011) Urban Forest development in West Africa: benefits and challenges. J Biodivers Ecol Sci 1(1):77–94
Gibbs KG, Brown SL, Niles JO, Foley JA (2007) Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality. Environ Res Lett 2:045023
Golubiewski NE (2006) Urbanization increases grassland carbon pools: effects of landscaping in Colorado’s front range. Ecol Appl 16(2):555–571
Hall JB, Harris DJ, Medjibe V, Ashton PMS (2003) The effects of selective logging on forest structure and tree species composition in a central African Forest: implications for management of conservation areas. For Ecol Manag 183:249–264
Hossain MA, Hossain MK, Hossain MD (2013) Natural regeneration potentials of native tree species in Dudhpukuria-Dophachari wildlife sanctuary of Chittagong, Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Forest Sci 33(2):15–25
Husch B, Beers TW, Keenshaw JA Jr (2003) Forest mensuration. 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York 443pp
Kaye JP, Mcculley RL, Burke IC (2005) Carbon fluxes, nitrogen cycling, and soil microbial communities in adjacent urban, native and agriculture ecosystems. Glob Chang Biol 11:575–587
Ketterings QM, Coe R, Van Noordwijk M, Ambagau Y, Palm CA (2001) Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests. For Ecol Manag 146(1–3):199–209
Kershaw, K.A. 1973. Quantitative and Dynamic Plant Ecology. Edward Arnold, London, 286
Komiyama A, Ong JE, Poungparn S (2008) Allometry, biomass and productivity of mangrove forests: a review. Aquat Bot 89:128–137
Konijnendijk C, Ricard RM, Kenny A, Randrup TB (2006) Defining urban forestry a comparative perspective of North America and Europe. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 4:93–103
Kridiborworn P, Chidthaisong A, Yuttitham M, Tripetchkul S (2012) Carbon sequestration by mangrove forest planted specifically for charcoal production in Yeesarn. Samut Songkram J Sust Energ Environ 3:87–89
Lawal A, Adekunle VAJ (2013) A silvicultural approach to volume yield, biodiversity and soil fertility restoration of degraded natural forest in south-West Nigeria. Int J Biodiv Sci, Ecosystem Services Manage 9(3):201–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2013.823464
Magurran, A.E. 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Oxford (UK): Blackwell; p. 256
Mchale MR, Burke IC, Lefsky MA, Peper PJ, Mcpherson EG (2009) Urban forest biomass estimates: is it important to use allometric relationships developed specifically for urban trees? Urban Ecosyst 12:95–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-009-0081-3
McPherson EG (1998) Atmospheric carbon dioxide reduction by Sacramento’s urban forest. J Arboric 24(4):215–223
Mcpherson, E.G. & Simpson, J.R. 2001. Carbon dioxide reductions through urban forestry: guidelines for professional and volunteer tree planters. PSW GTR 171. USDA Forest Service, Pacific southwest Research Station, Center for Urban Forest Research, Albany, CA
Miles L, Newton AC, DeFries RS, Ravilious C, May I, Blyth S, Kapos V, Gordon JE (2006) A global overview of the conservation status of tropical dry forests. J Biogeogr 33:491–505
Motz K, Sterba H, Pommerening A (2010) Sampling measures of tree diversity. For Ecol Manag 260:1985–1996
Munishi PKT, Temu RAPC, Soka G (2011) Plant communities and tree species associations in a miombo ecosystem in the Lake Rukwa basin, Southern Tanzania: Implications for conservation J Ecol Nat Environ 3(2011):63–71
NIACS (Northern Institute Of Applied Carbon Science) (2008) Estimating Carbon Mass in Northern Forests. NIACS Briefing (Janowiak, M. K. – Briefing contributor), 410 MacInnes Drive, Houghton, MI 49931, p 3
Onyekwelu JC, Olusola JA (2014) Role of sacred grove in in-situ biodiversity conservation in rainforest zone of South Western Nigeria. J Trop For Sci 26(1):5–15
Onyekwelu JC, Mosandl R, Stimm B (2008) Tree species diversity and soil status of primary and degraded tropical rainforest ecosystems in South-Western Nigeria. J Trop For Sci 20:193–204
Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Fang J, Houghton R, Kauppi PE, Kurz WA, Phillips OL, Shvidenko A, Lewis SL, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Jackson RB, Pacala SW, McGuire AD, Piao S, Rautiainen A, Sitch S, Hayes D (2011) A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science ((New York, N.Y.) 333(6):988–993. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201609
Pataki DE, Alig RJ, Fung AS, Golubiewski NE, Kennedy CA, Mcpherson EG, Nowak DJ, Pouyat RV, Lankao PR (2006) Urban ecosystems and the north American carbon cycle. Glob Chang Biol 12(11):2092–2102
Pearson T, Walker S, Brown S (2005) Sourcebook for land use, land-use change and forestry projects. Winrock International and the BioCarbon Fund of the World Bank, p 57
Ramachandran A, Jayakumar S, Haroon RM, Bhaskaran A, Arockiasamy DI (2007) Carbon sequestration: estimation of carbon stock in natural forests using geospatial technology in the eastern Ghats of Tamil Nadu, India. Curr Sci 92:323–331
Saatchi S, Harris NL, Brown S, Lefsky M, Mitchard ETA, Salas W, Zuttaa BR, Buermann W, Lewis SL, Hagen S, Petrova S, White L, Silman M, Morel A (2011) Impact of spatial variability of tropical forest structure on Radar estimation of aboveground biomass. Remote Sens Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.02.022
Salunkhei O, Khare PK, Sahu TR, Sarnam Singh (2016) Estimate of tree biomass reserves in tropical deciduous forests of Central India by nondestructive approach. Trop Ecol 57(2):253–161
Sitoe AA, Mondlate LJC, Guedes BS (2014) Biomass and carbon stocks of Sofala bay mangrove forests. Forests 5:1967–1981
Tang YJ, Chen AP, Zhao SQ (2016) Carbon storage and sequestration of urban street trees in Beijing, China. Front Ecol Evol 4:53. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2016.00053
Tonolli S, Rodeghiero M, Gianelle D, Dalponte M, Bruzzone L, Vescovo L (2011) Mapping and modeling forest tree volume using forest inventory and airborne laser scanning. Eur J For Res 130:569–577
Woldegerima T, Kumelachew Y, And Lindley S (2017) Ecosystem services assessment of the urban forests of Addis Ababa. Ethiopia, Urban Ecosystem 20:683–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0624-3
Wittmann F, Zorzi BT, Tizianel FAT, Urquiza MVS, Faria RR, Sousa NM, Módena EDS, Gamarra RM, Rosa ALM (2008) Tree species composition, structure, and aboveground wood biomass of a riparian forest of the lower Miranda river, southern Pantanal. Brazilian Folia Geo Botany 43:397–411
Zhou X, Hemstrom MA (2009) Estimating aboveground tree biomass on forest land in the Pacific Northwest: a comparison of approaches. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-584. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, p 18
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Agbelade, A.D., Onyekwelu, J.C. Tree species diversity, volume yield, biomass and carbon sequestration in urban forests in two Nigerian cities. Urban Ecosyst 23, 957–970 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-00994-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-00994-4