Abstract
A screen composed of in-plane thin strips is embedded in a porous medium. The screen is either normal or parallel to the applied pressure gradient which forces a flow through the anisotropic porous medium. The principal axes of anisotropy are assumed to be aligned with that of the screen. The governing equation is fourth order and cannot be factored as in the isotropic case. The solutions are found by eigenfunction superposition (with complex eigenvalues) and point match. Anisotropy has first-order effects on the flow and the drag on the screen. Extrapolation yields fundamental results for the drag of a single slat in an anisotropic porous medium.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Most literature on fluid flow in porous media considered the medium as isotropic. However, porous media such as rock formations, cardboard, filters and insulation are usually anisotropic. See Nield and Bejan (2006) for a review, especially on the effects of anisotropy in thermo-convective stability and internal natural convection. It was found that for fully developed internal flow the effect of anisotropy only alters certain constants since the flow is parallel (Dagan et al. 2002, Mobedi et al 2010; Karmakar and Sekhar 2018). For almost parallel boundary layer flows, anisotropy affects the magnitude but not the character of the results (Rees and Storeletten 1995; Vasseur and Degan 1998; Degan et al 2005; 2008; Bachok et al 2010). Of interest is the work of Rees et al (2002) which determines the first-order tilt of a (boundary layer) plume by matching to an outer flow.
This paper studies the effects of permeability anisotropy on forced flow over an obstruction embedded in a porous medium. Specifically, we consider a pressure driven Darcy-Brinkman flow over (or through) an infinite two-dimensional screen composed of thin strips arranged periodically in the same plane. The corresponding Stokes flow problem was solved by Hasimoto (1958) and the isotropic Darcy–Brinkman flow by Wang (2009). Here, we shall concentrate on the effect of anisotropy of the medium.
The Darcy−Brinkman equation for an anisotropic medium is (Bear 2018)
Here, \(\phi\) is the porosity, \(\mu_{e}\) is the effective viscosity, u’ is the velocity vector, p’ is the pressure, \(\mu\) is the viscosity of the fluid, and K is the permeability tensor, which when orthotropic would align with each velocity component. Notice porosity and viscosity are scalars, and thus anisotropy would not affect the first term (Brinkman term), and it affects only the last term (Darcy term). For homogeneous (but not isotropic) media, the porosity cancels and \(\mu_{e}\) can be taken out of the gradient operator. Actually \(\mu_{e}\) is very close to \(\mu\) (Breugem 2007).
We assume the principal axes of the permeability tensor are aligned with the Cartesian axes. Equation (1) reduces to
where (\(u^{\prime},v^{\prime},w^{\prime}\)) are velocity components in the (\(x^{\prime},y^{\prime},z^{\prime}\)) directions, respectively. Normalize all lengths by a characteristic length L, the velocities by a characteristic velocity U, the pressure by \(\mu_{e} U/L\) and drop primes. Equations (2–4) become
Here,
are inverse Darcy numbers. The continuity equation is
These equations, together with boundary conditions specific to the problem, will be solved.
2 Formulation
Figure 1a shows the present problem where a screen composed of periodically placed thin strips is embedded in an anisotropic porous medium. The forced velocity far from the screen can be decomposed into (U, V, W) components. Due to the linearity of the Darcy-Brinkman equation, the problem can be separated into three independent problems. Consider first the case of a pressure gradient causing a uniform flow W in the z- direction in a porous medium. Assume the medium is anisotropic, such that the permeabilities in the directions of (x, y, z) are (\(K_{1} ,K_{2} ,K_{3}\)), respectively. In this case, W is a parallel flow and a function of (x, y) only. It only depends on the permeability \(K_{3}\) and does not involve any anisotropy effects. One can use the isotropic results of Wang (2009) with permeability as \(K_{3} ,\) and we shall not discuss this case further.
The other two directions are not parallel flow and non-trivial. There are two cases: (A) the velocity U parallel to the plane of the screen and in the x direction, whose cross section is shown in Fig. 1b. (B) the velocity V normal the plane of the screen in the y direction, whose cross section is shown in Fig. 1c. In both cases, w is zero and all variables are independent of z. Since the flow is two-dimensional, Eq. (9) suggests a stream function \(\psi\) such that the velocities in the (x,y) directions are \(\left( {\psi_{y} , - \psi_{x} } \right)\). Equations (5,6) become
Here, \(\nabla^{2}\) is the two-dimensional Laplacian. If pressure is eliminated from Eqs. (10, 11), the stream function satisfies
The boundary conditions are that the velocities are zero on the slats and approaches uniform flow far from the screen. Note that if \(k_{1} ,k_{2}\) tends to zero, Eq. (12) becomes the biharmonic equation for Stokes flow of Hasimoto (1958). If \(k_{1} ,k_{2}\) are very large, or in the Darcy approximation, Eq. (12) degenerates to a second-order equation, but in general not Laplace's potential flow equation.
3 Case A: The Screen Parallel to the Pressure Gradient
Figure 1b shows the cross section of the screen. Consider a computational domain of \(0 \le x \le b, 0 \le y < \infty\). There are symmetries about x = 0, x = b and anti-symmetry about y = 0 (x > 1). We require the velocities be zero on the solid strip and the velocity approaches 1 at infinity. The boundary conditions are
and
Equations (13, 14, 17) suggest the form
where \(\alpha_{n} = \frac{n\pi }{b}.\) Equation (12) then gives \(H \sim e^{\lambda y}\) where
or
Notice that \(\lambda_{1,2}\) are in general complex conjugates. Considering Eqs. (15,16), the stream function is
The rest of the boundary conditions Eqs.(15,16) are to be satisfied by point match.
Here, we have truncated the series to N terms, and \(x_{j} = \frac{{b\left( {j - 0.5} \right)}}{N}, j = 1 \;{\text{to}}\; N\). Equations (22, 23) are solved for the N unknown coefficients \(B_{n}\).
The normalized shear stress on the strip is
Integrating over the two sides of a slat, the drag per period is
Since Eq. (21) is a Fourier series, convergence as \(N \to \infty\) is assured. Now, let us show the accuracy of the point match method as N is increased. Table 1 shows some typical convergence rates. It is seen that in general three-figure accuracy is attained when N reaches about 100. Up to 1000 terms are used for very small k or when b close to one, or b is very large.
Another comparison is with an exact solution. When b = 1, the strips are connected and the screen becomes a flat plate. Equation (12) reduces to
The no-slip boundary conditions give
The velocity is
The drag per period is
It is interesting this parallel flow solution reduces to uniform flow u = 1 in the Darcy limit \(\left( {k_{1} = \infty } \right)\), but it does not exist in the clear viscous flow limit (\(k_{1} = 0\)) due to Stokes paradox. Table 2 shows a comparison of our point match method to this exact solution as b approaches one. Due to the small gap width, up to 1000 terms are used for accuracy.
Figure 2 shows some typical streamlines. It is seen that the streamlines are closer to the screen if \(k_{1} > k_{2}\), than those of \(k_{1} < k_{2}\). It is also reflected in the drag per period in Table 2. The reason is due to the fact that the flow (and drag) is dominated by \(k_{1}\). Of interest is the drag due to a single strip, determined by the asymptote for large b. Table 3 shows the results. Our values for the isotropic case (\(k_{1} = k_{2}\)) agree with those of Wang (2009).
4 Case B: The Screen Normal to the Pressure Gradient
Figure 1c shows the cross section, where a velocity V at \(y = - \infty\) is forced through the gaps of the screen. Our computational domain is also \(0 \le x \le b, 0 \le y < \infty\). There are anti-symmetries about x = 0 and x = b, and symmetry about y = 0 (x > 1). The boundary conditions are
and as \(y \to \infty\),
Equations (30,31) suggest the form
where \(\alpha_{n} \) and \(\lambda_{1,2}\) are same as those in Case A. Using Eqs.(32, 33), the stream function is
The coefficients \(A_{n}\) are determined by point match as in Case A. Using the rest of the boundary conditions, Eqs. (32, 33) become, for i = 1 to N,
The unknowns \(A_{n}\) are inverted from the linear algebraic Eqs.(37, 38) by standard means. The convergence rate is similar to Case A.
From Eqs. (5,6), the pressure is integrated to be
where
and we have set the mean pressure at y = 0, \(1 < x \le b\) to zero. Since \(F_{n} \left( \infty \right) = 0\), the extra pressure drop due to the presence of the screen is c. Thus, the normalized drag per period due to the screen is
Our numerical results can be checked by the exact (clear-fluid) solution found by Hasimoto (1958). In our variables, his drag per period for Stokes flow through a screen is
Since our point match method does not admit \(k_{1} ,k_{2}\) identically zero, Table 4 shows the approach to zero. 600 terms are used for four-figure accuracy. It is seen that our results tend to Hasimoto’s solution.
Of interest is the drag for a single strip which is obtained by extrapolating the half period b to large values. Table 5 shows the drag of a single strip (\(b \to \infty\)). It is clear that the drag is larger if \(k_{1} > k_{2}\) as compared to \(k_{2} > k_{1}\). The values for the isotropic case \(k_{1} = k_{2}\) agree well with those found by Wang (2009).
5 Discussion
The anisotropic permeabilities \(K_{1} ,K_{2} ,K_{3}\) along the principal axes can be experimentally measured, or determined theoretically by pore-level micro fluid dynamics. (e.g., Wang 1996). In this paper, we assumed the principal axes are aligned with the axes of the embedded screen, which occur more often than those inclined at an angle to the solid surfaces. In the latter case, the permeability tensor should be used.
Our point match method is highly efficient, only N linear equations need to be solved in a finite interval. In contrast, finite differences (and boundary integrals) need to tackle an infinite domain, with at least 30 \(N^{2}\) equations. Fourier transforms cannot be applied due to the mixed boundary conditions.
There are many differences between the anisotropic cases of the present paper and the isotropic cases of Wang (2009). For example, the fourth-order partial differential equation, Eq. (12), cannot be factored into two second-order equations as in the isotropic case. Consequently, the eigenvalues Eq. (20) are complex, but the solutions are real. Anisotropy also has non-negligible effects on the streamlines (velocities) and the drag force experienced on the screen as shown in Figs. 2,3.
In the limit of \(b \to \infty\), we extrapolated for the drag force on a single strip. Such fundamental results are tabulated for the first time in Tables 3 and 4. The asymmetry of the Tables also shows the effects of anisotropy.
Let us compare the flow parallel to the screen (Case A) with the flow normal to the screen (Case B) illustrated in Fig. 1b and c where \(k_{1} < k_{2}\) as shown. Both Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 show when \(k_{1} < k_{2}\) the velocity is lower. However, Tables 3 and 4 show the drag is lower for flow parallel to the screen, but the drag is higher for the flow normal to the screen. This is because the drag is more sensitive to the permeability in the direction of the flow.
We hope this pilot paper would elicit more research in this interesting area.
References
Bachok, N., Ishak, A., Pop, I.: Mixed convection boundary layer flow near the stagnation point on a vertical surface embedded in a porous medium with anisotropic effects. Trans. Por. Med. 82, 363–373 (2010)
Bear, J.: Modeling Phenomena of Flow and Transport in Porous Media. Springer, New York (2018)
Breugem, W.P.: The effective viscosity of a channel-type porous medium. Phys. Fluids 19, 103–104 (2007)
Degan, G., Gibigaye, M., Akowanou, C., Awanou, N.C.: The similarity regime for natural convection in a vertical cylindrical well filled with an anisotropic porous medium. J. Eng. Math. 62, 277–287 (2008)
Degan, G., Vasseur, P., Awanou, N.C.: Anisotropic effects on non-Darcy natural convection from concentrated heat sources in porous media. Acta Mech. 179, 111–124 (2005)
Degan, G., Zohoun, S., Vasseur, P.: Forced convection in horizontal porous channels with hydrodynamic anisotropy. Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 45, 3181–3188 (2002)
Hasimoto, H.: On the flow of a viscous fluid past a thin screen at small Reynolds numbers. J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 13, 632–639 (1958)
Karmakar, T., Sekhar, G.P.A.: Effect of anisotropic permeability on convective flow through a porous tube with viscous dissipation effect. J. Eng. Math. 110, 15–37 (2018)
Mobedi, M., Cekmer, O., Pop, I.: Forced convection heat transfer inside an anisotropic porous channel with oblique principal axis: effect of viscous dissipation. Int. J. Thermal Sci. 49, 1984–1993 (2010)
Nield, D.A., Bejan, A.: Convection in Porous Media, 3rd ed. Springer, New York (2006)
Rees, D.A.S., Storesletten, L.: The effect of anisotropic permeability on free convective boundary layer flow in porous media. Trans. Por. Med. 19, 79–92 (1995)
Rees, D.A.S., Storesletten, L., Bassom, A.P.: Convective plume paths in anisotropic porous media. Trans. Por. Med. 49, 9–25 (2002)
Vasseur, P., Degan, G.: Free convection along a vertical heated plate in a porous medium with anisotropic permeability. Int. J. Num. Meth. Heat Fluid Flow 8, 43–63 (1998)
Wang, C.Y.: Stokes flow through an array of rectangular fibers. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 22, 185–194 (1996)
Wang, C.Y.: Darcy–Brinkman flow past a two-dimensional screen. Europ. J. Mech. B Fluids 28, 321–327 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, J., Wang, C.Y. Darcy–Brinkman Flow Over a Screen Embedded in an Anisotropic Porous Medium. Transp Porous Med 137, 603–612 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-021-01578-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-021-01578-2