Abstract
The Hedychium coronarium can emit a strong scent which is mainly composed of monoterpenes. A cDNA clone, HcTPS2 (H. coronarium terpene synthases), was cloned from H. coronarium flower. The gene has an open reading frame of 1,788 bp which encodes a protein of 596 amino acids with a calculated molecular mass of 66.7 kDa. The deduced amino acid sequence shows 35–38% identity with known monoterpene synthases in other angiosperm species. HcTPS2 was appreciably expressed in the petals, sepals, and stamens of H. coronarium, whereas no expression signal was detected in those of nonscented species. To the best of our knowledge, this is for the first time to clone the terpene synthase gene from H. coronarium, which provides the basis for biotechnological manipulation of scent composition in H. coronarium.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In addition to color and shape, scent is an important factor for insects, birds, and mammals to help assure pollination (Andersson 2006; Ayasse 2006; Dobson 2006; Roeder et al. 2007). Many plants emit variable floral scents with respect to quality (composition) and quantity (Knudsen et al. 2006). Benzenoids, fatty acid derivatives, and terpenoids are the major components of floral scents (Chen et al. 2003; Tholl et al. 2004; Knudsen et al. 2006). In particular, monoterpenes, the C10 members of the terpenoid of natural products, are common constituents of floral scents, they are important in the reproductive biology of certain plants giving flowers and fruit scents that attract pollinating insects and dispersal agents (Pichersky et al. 2002; Aharoni et al. 2005). More recently, monoterpenes have been demonstrated to have other functions, such as attraction of herbivore enemies (Kessler and Baldwin 2001; Schnee et al. 2006; Tholl 2006; Köllner et al. 2008, 2009), induction of defense against insets (Keeling and Bohlmann 2006; Köpke et al. 2008; Yuan et al. 2008), and protection from oxidative damage (Dudareva et al. 2004; Loreto et al. 2004). These floral odors may have evolved from protective functions of monoterpenes in vegetative and reproductive organs of angiosperms and gymnosperms (Bohlmann et al. 2000).
Various terpene synthase (TPS) genes and enzymes have been isolated and characterized from several angiosperms and gymnosperms. Although terpenoids comprise compound classes that are emitted by many flowers, only a few terpene synthase genes for floral scent biosynthesis have been reported to date. Linalool synthase, a monoterpene synthase, was first isolated and characterized in Clarkia breweri flowers (Pichersky et al. 1995; Dudareva et al. 1996). Another two monoterpene synthases’ genes, (E)-beta-ocimene and myrcene synthase, were isolated in snapdragon (Dudareva et al. 2003). Two flower-specific terpene synthases have been isolated from satsuma mandarins (Citrus unshiu Marc), producing 1, 8-cineole and (E)-beta-ocimene, respectively (Shimada et al. 2005). The germacrene D synthase from Rosa hybrida is a sesquiterpene synthase, which uses farnesyl pyrophosphate as substrate to synthesize germacrene D (Guterman et al. 2002). A humulene synthase gene was cloned from the rhizome of shampoo ginger, and its expression can be induced by methyl jasmonate (Yu et al. 2008). Recently, two terpene synthase genes were isolated from the flowers of kiwi fruit, which mainly produce sesquiterpene, and are localized in the cytoplasm, the site for sesquiterpene production (Nieuwenhuizen et al. 2009). A new monoterpene synthase gene was recently identified from tomato that uses neryl diphosphate as the precursor for monoterpenes synthesis (Schilmiller et al. 2009).
Monoterpene biosynthesis occurs in plastids (Pérez et al. 1990; Wise et al. 1998), and all known monoterpene synthases are encoded by nuclear genes and possess an N-terminal transit peptide that directs their import into the plastid (Turner et al. 1999). The 30–80 amino-terminal residues are characterized with a low degree of similarity, typical of targeting sequences, yet those sequences are serine- and threonine-rich but with few acidic residues (Keegstra et al. 1989). The DDxxD motif was found in virtually all deduced sequences for enzymes that utilize prenyl diphosphate substrates (Starks et al. 1997; Whittington et al. 2002), is responsible for the coordination of divalent cations and is essential for substrate binding and ionization (Starks et al. 1997; Whittington et al. 2002; Christianson 2006; Zhou and Peters 2009). In addition to DDxxD, the monoterpene synthases possess characteristic motifs, including RR(x)8W and LYEASY,GTLXEL. The RR(x)8W motif is essential for the enzymatic activity of many monoterpene synthases (Bohlmann et al. 1998; Williams et al. 1998), and LYEASY.GTLXEL motif was also thought to be part of the active site (Wise et al. 1998). As a result, the characterization of enzymes and genes involved in flowers scent production and emission is still in its initial stages. Most monoterpene synthase genes were characterized in dicotyledon plants, and that from monocotyledon plants is especially limited.
Hedychium coronarium is a herbaceous perennial that reaches up to 2 m in height. The white ginger lily (H. coronarium) originated from the Himalayas region of Nepal and India, it has been introduced to many countries as an ornamental. H. coronarium is a monocotyledon plant, its flowers have a delicious perfume, particularly pronounced in the evening (Nakamura et al. 2009). The flowers emit a strong scent consisting of a relatively simple mixture of monoterpeniod and benzoid compounds, and its main components in petals is L-linalool,1,8-cineole and1,3,7-octatriene-3,7-dimethyl, as have been reported in our previous studies. (Li and Fan 2007). So this species appeared to be an ideal source for the isolation of the related monoterpene synthase genes. In this study, a terpene synthase gene was isolated from H. coronarium flower using a functional genomics approach, and its expression was further analyzed at different flower development stages.
Materials and Methods
Plant Materials
Eight species from a local commercial plantation are used, including Hedychium coccineum, Hedychium gardnerianum, Hedychium flavum, Hedychium chrysoleucum, H. gardnerianum var. pink, H. coccineum, Hedychium forrestii and Hedychium spp.
RNA Extraction and Isolation of HcTPS2
Total RNA was isolated from frozen plant tissues using the hot borate method of Wan and Wilkins (1994). And that extracted from H. coronarium petals were used as templates for reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The product (the first-strand cDNA) was subjected to PCR amplification by forward primer LR1 (5′-ACATCGCTGCTCTTCAGGCT-3′) and reverse primer LR2 (5′-GCCCAGCCCACTGTCCACAA-3′), which were designed with the conserved motifs of Zingiber officinale TPS gene (DY352211).
The 3′ and 5′ end of HcTPS2 was isolated with a 3′ and 5′ rapid amplification of cDNAs ends (RACE) cDNA Amplification Kit (TaKaRa. Shiga, Japan), respectively. Gene-specific primers of LR3 (5′-CAGAGATGAGAAAGGCCAGT-3′), and LR4 (5′-TTGGAGGATGGAGAGACTGC-3′) were used for 3′ RACE. And the following specific primer: LR5 (5′-GCCCAGCCCACTGTCCACAA-3′) and LR6 (5′-TCTCCATCCTCCAATTCAA-3′) were used for 5′ RACE.
Northern Blotting
Approximately 20 μg of total RNA was denatured, separated on 1.2% denaturing formaldehyde agarose gels, and transferred onto a Polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Amersham Bioscience, Buckinghamshire, UK). The membrane was blot dried and cross-linked with UV at 280 nm. Digoxin (Dig)-labeled specific probes of 3′-untranslated regions of HcTPS2 was made using a PCR DIG probe synthesis kit (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany) with the following specific primers: LR7(5′-ACTACGGATCCGATTACGAACTATGAAGGA-3′) and LR8(5′-CTGTAAGCTTGTCTTTGAAGTGGTATGCCA-3′). The membrane was hybridized with DIG-labeled probe for 16 h at 45°C in high sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) buffer [7% SDS, 5× sodium chloride/sodium citrate (SSC), 50 mmol/L sodium-phosphate (pH 7.0), 2% blocking reagent, and 0.1% N-lauroylsarcosinel containing 50% deionized formamide (v/v)]. Blots were washed twice at 37°C in 2× SSC and 0.1% SDS for 10 min, followed by washing twice at 62°C in 0.1× SSC and 0.1% SDS for 30 min. The membranes were then subjected to immunological detection following the manufacturer′s instructions.
DNA Sequencing and Sequence Analysis
DNA fragments were sequenced at Invitrogen Biotechnology Company Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Coding sequences of the cDNAs were identified using DNASTAR (Burland 2000). HcTPS2 protein sequence was used as a query to search the protein database using NCBI resource. Alignments of protein sequences were performed using programs from DNAssist Package version 2 and CLUSTAL.W (http://www-igbmc.u-strasbg.fr/BioInfo/ClustalX). Sequence relatedness was analyzed using CLUSTAL.W and the neighbor-joining method (Kumar et al. 2001), the rooted tree was visualized using Treedraw (http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/treeview.htm).
Results
Amino Acid Sequence Analysis of HcTPS2
The initial PCR primers were designed with conserved regions near the C-terminal Asp-rich motif (DDxxD) found in association with DY352211 fragment cloned from Zingiber officinale. The 560-bp cDNA fragment was amplified from mRNA in young flowers. The fragment exhibited sequence similarities to TPS genes (E≤e-19). To isolate full-length cDNA, 3′ and 5′ RACE approaches were used, and totally 2,145 nucleotides with a 174-bp 5′ untranslated region and an open reading frame of 1,788 nucleotides was obtained. The gene encodes a protein of 596 amino acids with a MW of 66.7 kDa and a calculated pI of 5.6. It was named as HcTPS2.
A BLAST search of GeneBank revealed that HcTPS2 shared 38% identity with limonene synthase from Citrus limon, 36.4% identity with (3R)-linalool synthase from Artemisia annua, and 35.7% identity with myrecene synthase from Arabidopsis thaliana at the amino acids level (Fig. 1). There are several regions of conservation between HcTPS2 and diverse original TPSs, including the active side DDxxD, RR(x)8W, and LYEASY.GTLXEL motifs.
Furthermore, HcTPS2 contains an N-terminal transit peptide, approximately 26–52 amino acids, for plastid import, which is the characteristic terminal of monoterpene synhtase (Bohlmann et al. 1998; Williams et al. 1998; Lücker et al. 2002), when online analyzed with ChloroP1.1 software (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ChloroP/).
The monophyletic plant TPS family has been divided into seven subfamilies, from TPS-a to TPS-g, based on sequence relatedness as well as functional assessment (Bohlmann et al. 1998). The analysis of the phylogenetic relationship of HcTPS2 by using Clustal.W and the neighbor-joining method has clustered HcTPS2 into the TPS-b subfamily, which combines monoterpene genes of a variety of angiosperm species (Fig. 2).
Expression Pattern of HcTPS2
To determine tissues specificity of HcTPS2 expression, total RNA was isolated from H. coronarium leaves, roots, tubers, stems, bracts, and floral tissues (floral shoots, petals, sepals, stamens, and pistils) of buds (1 day before opening) and used in RNA gel blot hybridizations (Fig. 3a). HcTPS2 expression level was different of these floral tissues, its transcripts accumulated to high levels in stamens, petals, and sepals, the parts of the flowers that were shown previously to be primarily responsible for scent production and emission (Dudareva et al. 2000). A very low level of transcripts was detected in the pistils and floral shoots. No detectable signal was found in other tissues.
We also examined the expression of HcTPS2 in buds of H. gardnerianum, H. flavum, H. chrysoleucum, and H. gardnerianum var. pink, which can emit scent, and H. coccineum, H. forrestii, and Hedychium spp that do not emit a detectable scent (data not shown). A hybridization signal was detected only in scented species, not in scentless species (Fig. 3b).
Developmental Modulation of HcTPS2 Expression
We next analyzed the temporal and spatial accumulation patterns of HcTPS2 mRNA in floral organs of H. coronarium. Total RNA was isolated from petals, sepals, stamens, and pistils of flowers at different times after anthesis (1 to 2 days) and also from buds at stage 0.5 (0.5 day before opening), stage 1 (1 day before opening), and stage 2 (2 days before opening).
Some HcTPS2 mRNA was found in sepals and petals at stage 2 (2 days before opening; Fig. 3c), with trace amounts was found in stamens as well, but no detectable signals in pistils (Fig. 3d). HcTPS2 expression was highly detected first in mature flowers buds (1 day before opening) except pistils, and its level increased until it peaked on day 1 (1 day after anthesis). The higher level of HcTPS2 expression was found in sepals, petals, and stamens, despite the gradual increase, this level was still relatively high in mature flower buds (1 day before opening). The amount of HcTPS2 transcripts was significantly decreased in 2 days after anthesis in floral organs (Fig. 3).
Discussion
In this study, HcTPS2 was isolated from H. coronarium flowers by using RT-PCR in combination with RACE technology. Northern blotting showed that HcTPS2 was predominantly expressed in flower tissues, especially in stamens, petals, and sepals. Similar expression profiles of a monoterpene synthase were observed in Nicotiana suaveolens (Roeder et al. 2007). Moreover, the HcTPS2 transcription was temporally and spatially regulated during flower opening and the steady state levels of HcTPS2 in stamens, petals, sepals, and pistils are regulated developmentally, peaking on 1 day after anthesis and then beginning to decline. It is strongly up-regulated during scented species petals development rather than nonscented species. We found the scentless species also contain this gene in their genome (data not shown), but its expression level is too low to be detected by Northern blot analysis. In gray poplar, isoprene synthase promoter activity, which correlates with basal isoprene emission capacity, is not uniformly distributed within leaf tissue and can adapt rapidly towards internal as well as external environmental stimuli (Cinege et al. 2009). So it is likely because the differences in the HcTPS2 promoters between these two types of species lead to the vastly different expression characteristics, but this remains to be verified experimentally.
Although changes in transcript level may not directly determine protein levels or enzyme activities due to possible post-transcriptional or enzyme-regulatory mechanisms, the positive correlation between transcript levels and volatile emission suggests that changes in transcript levels are an important determinant of scent production (Dudareva et al. 2004). The HcTPS2 transcript was temporally and spatially regulated during flower opening, and its expression profiles, in this study, closely match the changes both quantitatively and qualitatively in monoterpenes emissions as observed in our previous studies (Li and Fan 2007), so there maybe a positive correlation between HcTPS2 transcript levels and monoterpenes emission.
Conserved peptide sequence analysis has revealed that the HcTPS2 protein has a typical monoterpene synthase structure. It contains a RR(x)8W motif, a LYEASY,GTLXEL motif, and an N-terminal transit peptide. And the sequence similarity of HcTPS2 to other monoterpene synthases is ranging from 35% to 38%. Further analysis of the phylogenetic relationship of terpene synthases has clustered HcTPS2 into the TPS-b subfamily, which predominantly contains monoterpene synthase from angiosperms (Fig. 2). So, HcTPS2, which possess all the important characters of monoterpene synthase, can be predicted as a monoterpene synthase, rather than a sesquiterpene synthase.
The HcTPS2 cDNA present the first terpene synthase gene cloned from H. coronarium species that emit aroma and flavor bouquet composed of mainly monoterpenes and other volatiles. The isolation and expression analysis of HcTPS2 will facilitate the cloning of additional genes of the TPS family in H. coronarium, and may be developed into molecular markers to aid in breeding and improvement of varieties with superior aroma and flavor traits.
Abbreviations
- HcTPS2:
-
Hedychium coronarium terpene synthases 2
- RACE:
-
Rapid amplification of cDNAs ends
- RT-PCR:
-
Reverse transcription PCR
- SDS:
-
Sodium dodecyl sulfate
- SSC:
-
Sodium chloride/sodium citrate (buffer)
- TPS:
-
Terpene synthase
References
Aharoni A, Jongsma MA, Bouwmeester HJ (2005) Volatile science? Metabolic engineering of terpenoids in plants. Trends Plant Sci 10:594–602
Andersson S (2006) Floral scent and butterfly pollinators. In: Dudareva N, Pichersky E (eds) Biology of floral scent. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 199–217
Ayasse M (2006) Floral scent and pollinator attraction in sexuallydeceptive orchids. In: Dudareva N, Pichersky E (eds) Biology offloral scent. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 219–241
Bohlmann J, Meyer-Gauen G, Croteau RB (1998) Plant terpenoid synthases: molecular biology and phylogenetic analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:4126–4413
Bohlmann J, Gershenzon J, Aubourg S (2000) Biochemical, molecular genetic and evolutionary aspects of defense-related terpenoid metabolism in conifers. Recent Adv Phytochem 34:109–150
Burland TG (2000) DNASTAR’s Lasergene sequence analysis software. Methods Mol Biol 132:71–91
Chen F, Tholl D, D'Auria JC et al (2003) Biosynthesis and emission of terpenoid volatiles from Arabidopsis flowers. Plant Cell 15:481–494
Christianson DW (2006) Structural biology and chemistry of the terpenoid cyclases. Chem Rev 106:3412–3442
Cinege G, Louis S, Hänsch R et al (2009) Regulation of isoprene synthase promoter by environmental and internal factors. Plant Mol Biol 69:593–604
Dobson HEM (2006) Relationship between floral fragrance composition and type of pollinator. In: Dudareva N, Pichersky E (eds) Biology of floral scent. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 147–197
Dudareva N, Cseke L, Blanc VM et al (1996) Evolution of floral scent in Clarkia: novel patterns of S-linalool synthase gene expression in the C. breweri flower. Plant Cell 8:1137–1148
Dudareva N, Murfitt LM, Mann CJ et al (2000) Developmental regulation of methyl benzoate biosynthesis and emission in snapdragon flowers. Plant Cell 12:949–961
Dudareva N, Martin D, Kish CM et al (2003) (E)-beta-ocimene and myrcene synthase genes of floral scent biosynthesis in snapdragon: function and expression of three terpene synthase genes of a new terpene synthase subfamily. Plant Cell 15:1227–1241
Dudareva N, Pichersky E, Gershenzon J (2004) Biochemistry of plant volatiles. Plant Physiol 135:1893–1902
Guterman I, Shalit M, Menda N et al (2002) Rose scent: genomics approach to discovering novel floral fragrance-related genes. Plant Cell 14:2325–2338
Keegstra K, Oisen LJ, Theg SM (1989) Chloroplastic and their transport across the envelope membranes. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 40:471–501
Keeling CI, Bohlmann J (2006) Genes, enzymes and chemicals of terpenoid diversity in the constitutive and induced defence of conifers against insects and pathogens. New Phytol 170:657–675
Kessler A, Baldwin IT (2001) Defensive function of herbivore-induced plant volatile emissions in nature. Science 291:2141–2144
Köllner TG, Held M, Lenk C et al (2008) A maize (E)-beta-caryophyllene synthase implicated in indirect defense responses against herbivores is not expressed in most American maize varieties. Plant Cell 20:482–494
Köllner TG, Gershenzon J, Degenhardt J (2009) Molecular and biochemical evolution of maize terpene synthase 10, an enzyme of indirect defense. Phytochemistry 70(9):1139–1145
Köpke D, Schröder R, Fischer HM et al (2008) Does egg deposition by herbivorous pine sawflies affect transcription of sesquiterpene synthases in pine? Planta 228:427–438
Knudsen JT, Eriksson R, Gershenzon J et al (2006) Diversity and distribution of floral scent. Botanical Review 72:1–120
Kumar S, Tamura K, Jakobsen IB, Kumar S, Tamura K, Jakobsen IB et al (2001) MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Bioinformatics 17:1244–1245. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1244
Li RH, Fan YP (2007) Changes in Floral Aroma constituents in Hedychium coronarium Koenig during different blooming stages. Plant Physiol Commun 43(1):176–180
Loreto F, Pinelli P, Manes F et al (2004) Impact of ozone on monoterpene emissions and evidence for an isoprene-like antioxidant action of monoterpenes emitted by Quercus ilex leaves. Tree Physiol 24:361–367
Lücker J, El Tamer MK et al (2002) Monoterpene biosynthesis inlemon (Citrus limon): cDNA isolation and functional analysis of four monoterpene synthases. Eur J Biochem 269:3160–317
Nieuwenhuizen NJ, Wang MY, Matich AJ et al (2009) Two terpene synthases are responsible for the major sesquiterpenes emitted from the flowers of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa). J Exp Bot 60:3203–3219
Nakamura S, Okazaki Y, Ninomiya K et al (2009) Medicinal flowers. XXIV. Chemical structures and hepatoprotective effects of constituents from flowers of Hedychium coronarium. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 56(12):1704–1709
Pérez LM, Pauly G, Carde JP et al (1990) Biosynthesis of limonene by isolated chromoplasts from Citrus sinensis fruits. Plant Physiol Biochem 28:221–229
Pichersky E, Lewinsohn E, Croteau R (1995) Purification and characterization of S-linalool synthase, an enzyme involved in the production of floral scent in Clarkia breweri. Arch Biochem Biophys 316:803–807
Pichersky E, Gershenzon J, Pichersky E et al (2002) The formation and function of plant volatiles: perfumes for pollinator attraction and defense. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 5:237–243
Roeder S, Hartmann AM, Effmert U et al (2007) Regulation of simultaneous synthesis of floral scent terpenoids by the 1, 8-cineole synthase of Nicotiana suaveolens. Plant Mol Biol 65:107–124
Schilmiller AL, Schauvinhold I, Larson M et al (2009) Monoterpenes in the glandular trichomes of tomato are synthesized from a neryl diphosphate precursor rather than geranyl diphosphate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:10865–10870
Schnee C, Köllner TG, Held M et al (2006) The products of a single maize sesquiterpene synthase form a volatile defense signal that attracts natural enemies of maize herbivores. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:1129–1134
Shimada T, Endo T, Fujii H et al (2005) Isolation and characterization of (E)-beta-ocimene and 1, 8-cineole synthases in Citrus unshiu Marc. Plant Sci 168:987–995
Starks CM, Back KW, Chappell J et al (1997) Structural basis for cyclic terpene biosynthesis by tobacco 5-epi-aristolochene synthase. Science 277:1815–1820
Tholl D (2006) Terpene synthases and the regulation, diversity and biological roles of terpene metabolism. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:297–304
Tholl D, Kish CM, Orlova I et al (2004) Formation of monoterpenes in Antirrhinum majus and Clarkia breweri flowers involves heterodimeric geranyl diphosphate synthases. Plant Cell 16:977–992
Turner G, Gershenzon J, Nielson EE et al (1999) Limonene synthase, the enzyme responsible for monoterpene biosynthesis in peppermint, is localized to leucoplasts of oil gland secretory cells. Plant Physiol 120:879–886
Wan CY, Wilkins TA (1994) A modified hot borate method significantly enhances the yield of high-quality RNA from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Anal Biochem 223:7–12
Whittington DA, Wise ML, Urbansky M et al (2002) Bornyl diphosphate synthase: structure and strategy for carbocation manipulation by a terpenoid cyclase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:15375–15380
Williams DC, McGarvey DJ, Katahira EJ et al (1998) Truncation of limonene synthase preprotein provides a fully active ‘pseudomature’ form of this monoterpene cyclase and reveals the function of the amino-terminal arginine pair. Biochemistry 37:12213–12220
Wise ML, Savage TJ, Katahira E et al (1998) Monoterpene synthases from common sage (Salvia officinalis) cDNA isolation, characterization, and functional expression of (+)-sabinene synthase, 1, 8-cineole synthase, and (+)-bornyl diphosphate synthase. J Biol Chem 273:14891–14899
Yu F, Okamto S, Nakasone K et al (2008) Molecular cloning and functional characterization of alpha-humulene synthase, a possible key enzyme of zerumbone biosynthesis in shampoo ginger (Zingiber zerumbet Smith). Planta 227:1291–1299
Yuan JS, Köllner TG, Wiggins G et al (2008) Molecular and genomic basis of volatile-mediated indirect defense against insects in rice. Plant J 55:491–503
Zhou K, Peters RJ (2009) Investigating the conservation pattern of a putative second terpene synthase divalent metal binding motif in plants. Phytochemistry 70:366–369
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (30972026) and Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (07006667) to Y. F.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, R., Fan, Y. Molecular Cloning and Expression Analysis of a Terpene Synthase Gene, HcTPS2, in Hedychium coronarium . Plant Mol Biol Rep 29, 35–42 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-010-0205-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-010-0205-1