Abstract
Aims
The changes of nutrient limitation status for tree growth across a plantation chronosequence have great implications for plantation management. The underlying mechanisms for such a shift, however, have seldom been addressed. While plant nutrient use strategies would change in response to soil nutrient alteration, they may also create feedback on soil nutrient dynamics and thus plant nutrient limitation status.
Methods
We examined soil and foliar nutrients of larch (Larix kaempferi), the dominant timber species in Northeast China, across a plantation chronosequence.
Results
Total soil N increased but total soil P decreased across the chronosequence. Similarly, N concentrations in the green leaves were positively correlated, and P concentrations were negatively correlated with stand age. Foliar N:P ratios, N and P resorption efficiencies and PRE:NRE were positively correlated with stand age, indicating the shift from N-limitation to P-limitation across the chronosequence. P concentration in senesced leaves decreased and N:P ratios increased across the chronosequence, which has implications for decomposition and nutrient release.
Conclusions
Nutrient resorption, soil pH, biomass P sequestration and imbalanced inputs of N and P would contribute to the occurrence of P-limitation with increased stand age. Furthermore, adaptive fertilization management strategies should consider the shift of nutrient limitation patterns across the chronosequence.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) have been shown to strongly limit forest growth and productivity (Elser et al. 2007; Vitousek et al. 2010). Plantation forests in temperate zones are generally more frequently limited by soil N availability (Vitousek and Howarth 1991; Magnani et al. 2007; Iversen and Norby 2008), especially for young stands (Hayes et al. 2014; Mediavilla et al. 2014). Nevertheless, P tends to progressively become limiting in aging forests and with increased tree sizes (Vitousek and Howarth 1991; Hayes et al. 2014; Chen et al. 2016). Moreover, older stands of temperate plantations are stronger sinks for N than younger stands, and the imbalanced inputs of N and P may result in a shift from N- to P-limitation for plantation ecosystems (Deng et al. 2016; Sun et al. 2016). Such changes of nutrient limitation status across the plantation chronosequence would be influential for tree growth and have great implications for plantation management.
Nutrient resorption from senescing organs is one of the most important mechanisms by which plants conserve and optimize the use of nutrients (Aerts 1996; Brant and Chen 2015). This process can facilitate the reuse of internal nutrients directly in further growth, and make plants less dependent on soil nutrient supply (Aerts 1996; Kobe et al. 2005). Therefore, nutrient resorption is beneficial for the growth, reproduction and competitive ability of plants (May and Killingbeck 1992). It is commonly accepted that nutrient resorption can be negatively determined by the availability of soil nutrients (Aerts and Chapin 2000; Tully et al. 2013). However, multiple studies have suggested that it is not the case that plants growing on lower fertility soil consistently have higher rates of nutrient resorption (Aerts 1996), and fertilization studies do not show consistent responses of resorption to increasing soil nutrient status (Deng et al. 2016; Huang et al. 2016). In addition to soil, plant nutrient status also exerted positive (Yan et al. 2016), negative (Kobe et al. 2005) and even no effect (Aerts 1996) on leaf nutrient resorption. With the development of forest plantations, the associated nutrient supply and requirements are often changed (Gower et al. 1996; Yuan and Chen 2010; Sun et al. 2016). Such changes in soil and plant nutrient status would have substantial effects on plant nutrient conservation strategies (Kobe et al. 2005; Lü et al. 2012; Vergutz et al. 2012; See et al. 2015). Higher nutrient resorption decreases the litter quality and decomposition, which in turn decreases soil nutrient availability and reinforces plant nutrient limitation status (Aerts and Chapin 2000; Lü et al. 2012; Yan et al. 2016).
Variations of soil nutrients and plant ecophysiological traits have been demonstrated along ontogeny of trees (Mediavilla and Escudero 2004; England and Attiwill 2006; Yuan and Chen 2010). Such ontogenetic changes would be a source of variability in leaf nutrient resorption (Yuan and Chen 2010; Mediavilla et al. 2014; Sun et al. 2016). Knowledge of nutrient conservation strategy changes with plant age would help gain a better understanding of the plant adaptation to the changing environmental conditions. Among previous studies, the inconsistent results of the variations of nutrient resorption in response to stand development may be related to tree species and environmental conditions (Yuan and Chen 2010; Mediavilla et al. 2014; Zhou et al. 2016). Furthermore, it is still no clear how the resorption patterns in larch plantations, which would put insight into soil nutrient limitation, control and consequences.
Larch (Larix spp. mainly including L. olgensis, L. principis-rupprechtii, and L. kaempferi) is the dominant timber species in Northeast China (Zhu et al. 2008, 2010; Mason and Zhu 2014). The extensive area of larch plantation reaches 2.61 million hectares in Northeast China, and accounts for an estimated 85% of the total larch plantation area in China (Chinese Ministry of Forestry 2014). Most larch plantations were developed by replacing the secondary forests, which had been formed from primary forests after intensive human disturbances, and thus formed the mosaic plantation-secondary forest landscapes (Yang et al. 2013; Mason and Zhu 2014). However, compared with the adjacent secondary forests, soil carbon (C) and N were declined by 30% in the ca. 40-year-old larch plantations, because of the single species composition and mono-silviculture system (Yang et al. 2013). Chen et al. (2016) demonstrated a trend of decreased available P with the development of larch (Larix olgensis) plantations, especially for the older stages (e.g., 34- and 49-year-old stands). Therefore, the feedbacks between plant nutrient use strategy and soil nutrient availability across a plantation chronosequence would have great implications for larch plantation management.
In this study, we examined the changes of soil and foliar nutrients of larch (L. kaempferi) plantations across a chronosequence (10-, 21-, 34- and 55-year-old) in Northeast China. The objectives of this study were to (i) quantify the variations of N and P resorption across the larch plantation chronosequence and thus to assess the changes of nutrient use strategy in different aged larch plantations and (ii) explore the relationships between leaf nutrition and soil nutrient status and thus to assess the responses of leaf nutrients to the altered soil nutrient status in different aged larch plantations. We hypothesized that (i) nutrient resorption would increase along the larch plantation chronosequence, since nutrient demand may increase while soil nutrient availability decrease with stand development and (ii) nutrient resorption efficiency would negative and significant relationships with leaf and soil nutrient status, since nutrient resorption is an important nutrient conservation mechanism. Consequently, the results of this study have beneficial implications for nutrient conservation and management in larch plantations.
Material and methods
Study sites
This study was conducted at the Qingyuan Forest CERN (Chinese Ecosystem Research Network), Chinese Academy of Sciences, located in a mountainous region of Liaoning Province, China (41°51′N, 124°54′E, elevation 500–1100 m above sea level). The climate of this region is a continental monsoon type with a humid, rainy summer and a cold, dry winter. The mean annual air temperature varies between 3.9 and 5.4°C, and the minimum and maximum temperatures are −37.6 and 36.5°C in January and July, respectively. Annual precipitation ranges from 700 to 850 mm, of which 80% falls from June to August. On average, the frost-free period lasts for 130 days, with the first frost in October and the last frost in April (Zhu et al. 2007).
Before the 1930s, this study site was covered by a primary mixed broadleaf-Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) forest, and thereafter suffered from decades of excessive timber harvesting. In the early 1950s, the original forests were completely cleared by a large fire. Since that time, the study site has naturally regenerated as a secondary forest. Fraxinus rhynchophylla, Juglans mandshurica, Phellodendron amurense, Quercus mongolica and Acer mono were the dominant tree species of the natural secondary forests. Since the 1960s, patches of the natural secondary forests were cleared and replaced by larch plantations (Larix spp. mainly including L. olgensis, L. principis-rupprechtii, and L. kaempferi), resulting in a mosaic of larch plantation and secondary forest landscapes (Yang et al. 2013; Mason and Zhu 2014).
Experimental design
We selected four even-aged and pure larch (Larix kaempferi) plantation stands (10-, 21-, 34-, and 55-year-old, respectively) within the Qingyuan Forest CERN, CAS to represent a chronosequence. Three replicate 20 m × 20 m plots were established within each stand, and >10 m buffer zones between them (see details in Yan et al. 2017). Within each plot, five healthy individuals with different diameters at breast height (DBHs) were sampled to ensure that the sample trees were representative of that plot’s DBH distribution, i.e., each individual represents a DBH class with a 2 cm interval from the minimum to maximum for the 21-, 34-, and 55-year-old stands, and a 1 cm interval from the minimum to maximum for the 10-year-old stand. To quantify the variability of leaf nutrient resorption within this chronosequence, we selected all the stands based on the following criteria. First, all the stands were topographically similar, i.e., all the sites were located in a well-drained middle slope position, with slopes ranging from 13 to 17°, and elevations ranging from 462 to 615 m above sea level (Table 1). The soils of all of the stands are typical brown forest soils and are classified as Udalfs based on the second edition of United States Department of Agriculture soil taxonomy, with 25.6% sand, 51.2% silt, and 23.2% clay on average (Yang et al. 2013), and soil depth was approximately 50 to 60 cm. Second, to reduce the influences from site conditions (Sun et al. 2016), the distance between any two stands was less than 2.3 km. Thus, all the stands shared similar climate and micro-environmental conditions. Third, all the larch plantation stands were in their first rotation, and were developed by replacing the secondary forests. The understory species (e.g., shrub and grass) of the 10- and 21-year-old stands were relatively species-poor, whereas those of the 34- and 55-year-old stands were species-rich.
Leaf and soil sampling
Green leaves were collected in mid-August 2015, when the leaves were at peak biomass, and senesced leaves were collected in October, during the period of maximum abscission (Yan et al. 2016). A sufficient quantity of needles from the lower to upper canopy for each individual were sampled (leaves with obvious diseases and/or insect pests were excluded) for the subsequent chemical analysis. Senesced leaves were also directly collected from trees rather than from litter to avoid underestimation of nutrient concentrations in the senesced leaves due to decomposition and leaching (Vergutz et al. 2012; Li et al. 2013). We considered leaves ready to fall off if they were completely yellow, dry without any signs of deterioration, and would fall from the branch with just a gentle shake or touch (Killingbeck and Whitford 2001; Wright and Westoby 2003; Yan et al. 2016).
As the surface soil (0–10 cm) is the most closely related to plant nutrients and strongly susceptible to litter decomposition (Yang and Zhu 2015), four soil samples were randomly taken at 0–10 cm (after removing the litter layer) within 1 m of the base of each selected tree with a metal tube (5 cm Ø) and pooled to obtain one composite soil sample per tree (Li et al. 2013). Soil samples were air-dried, cleaned of small stones and any visible plant and root residues, then ground and passed through a 0.25-mm sieve for total C, N and P analysis.
Chemical analysis
All plant samples were taken to the laboratory immediately, oven dried at 65°C for at least 48 h to constant mass and then ground to pass through a 60-mesh sieve (0.25 mm). Leaf and soil total C and N were determined by Elementar vario MICRO cube (Germany). Leaf and soil total P were measured by a molybdenum blue colorimetric method after digestion in sulfuric acid-hydrogen peroxide and nitric acid-perchloric acid-hydrofluoric acid, respectively. Soil pH was determined using a 1:2.5 soil/water ratio slurry.
Definitions and calculations
Nutrient resorption efficiency (NuRE) was used to quantify the nutrient resorption. NuRE was defined as the relative amount of nutrients resorbed during senescence (Aerts 1996).
However, leaf mass would be reduced due to the carbon resorption during senescence (Aerts 1996; Mediavilla et al. 2014). Thus, nutrient resorption efficiency based on leaf mass would be underestimated (van Heerwaarden et al. 2003; Mediavilla et al. 2014). To corrected the unbiased resorption value, Vergutz et al. (2012) introduced the mass loss correction factor (MLCF) based on 86 studies and ~1000 data points in six plant types across climates globally. Therefore, nutrient resorption efficiency was calculated as follows: NuRE (%) = [(Ng – Ns × MLCF) / Ng] × 100, where the MLCF value was 0.745 for conifers, and Ng and Ns represent nutrient concentrations in green and senesced leaves, respectively (Vergutz et al. 2012).
Statistical analysis
The normality of data was checked by Kolmogorov-Smirnov’s test, and the homogeneity of variances was examined by Levene’s test. We used one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to test the differences of soil nutrients and stoichiometric ratios among the different aged larch plantations; if the difference was significant, then post hoc multiple comparisons were conducted using the LSD test. Relationships between the stand age and leaf nutrient concentration, stoichiometric ratio, nutrient resorption efficiency and PRE:NRE were estimated by using linear regressions. Stand age was log-transformed to comply with normality assumptions. Pearson bivariate correlations were used to determine the relationships between nutrient resorption efficiency, senesced leaf nutrient status and soil nutrient concentrations and stoichiometric ratios. All the statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for windows.
Results
Soil total N and P concentrations and N:P ratio
Soil total N was significantly increased and soil total P was significantly decreased with stand age (P < 0.05). Soil N:P ratio was significantly increased across the plantation chronosequence (P < 0.05, Table 2).
Leaf N and P concentrations, N:P ratio, NRE and PRE
Green leaf N concentrations were significantly increased (P = 0.027), ranging from 2.12 to 2.86%, but no significant differences were found for senesced leaf N concentrations with stand age (Fig. 1a). In contrast, green leaf P concentrations were significantly decreased (P < 0.001), ranging from 0.25 to 0.14%, and senesced leaf P concentrations were also significantly decreased (P < 0.001), ranging from 0.18 to 0.03% with stand age (Fig. 1b). Both green and senesced leaves N:P ratios were significantly increased (all P < 0.001) with stand age, ranging from 8.91 to 18.79 and from 6.82 to 26.28, respectively (Fig. 1c and d).
NRE and PRE were significantly increased (P = 0.008 and P < 0.001, respectively) with stand age (Fig. 2a). Specifically, NRE ranged from 57.98 to 76.54%, and PRE ranged from 44.60 to 83.71% in the 10- and 55-year-old stands, respectively. PRE:NRE were increased (P < 0.001) along the stand age chronosequence (Fig. 2b).
Correlations of nutrient resorption efficiency, nutrient concentration, and stoichiometry in senesced leaf and soil
Soil total N was positively correlated with NRE, PRE and N:P in senesced leaves (P = 0.001, P = 0.002 and P = 0.020, respectively), but negatively correlated with N and P concentrations in senesced leaves (P = 0.006 and P = 0.018, respectively) (Table 3). Soil total P was only negatively correlated with N:P in senesced leaves (P = 0.021), whereas soil N:P was negatively (P = 0.030) and positively (P = 0.007) correlated with P concentration and N:P in senesced leaves, respectively (Table 3). NRE and PRE were positively and negatively correlated with green-leaf N and P concentrations, respectively (P = 0.037 and P = 0.003, respectively) (Table 3).
Discussion
Nutrient use strategies across the plantation chronosequence
An increase in soil total N but a decrease in soil total P were observed across the stand age chronosequence (Table 2). Our findings are in agreement with the results of Kuznetsova et al. (2011), who found that soil N concentration increased and soil P concentration and soil pH decreased with increasing stand age for black alder (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.), silver birch (Betula pendula Roth.), and scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) plantations. Similar findings were also observed in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) for soil total N (Yuan and Chen 2010), and larch (Larix olgensis) for soil total P with stand development (Chen et al. 2016; Deng et al. 2016). In our study, the increase of N and decrease of P concentrations in green leaves (Fig. 1) could be directly driven by the specific changes of soil nutrients availability (Aerts 1996; Lambers et al. 2008; Li et al. 2013). Moreover, both the soil and leaf element-specific responses to stand age suggested that older stands may have higher ability to absorb N but lower ability to absorb P from soil than younger stands (Wang et al. 2014).
In accordance with our first hypothesis, both NRE and PRE increased (the increments were from 58 to 77% and from 45 to 84%, respectively) with stand age (Fig. 2), indicating that larch plantations became more efficient in using the N and P across the plantation chronosequence. This was consistent with some previous studies, which reported that the fractions of N and P retranslocated in older stands were significantly higher than those in younger stands (Hayes et al. 2014; Mediavilla et al. 2014; Sun et al. 2016), but was dissimilar with the results of other studies (Yuan and Chen 2010; Li et al. 2013; Zhou et al. 2016). Three possible mechanisms for such NRE and PRE patterns in response to the stand development. First, the nutrient requirements for leaf biomass production increased with stand age, because a substantial proportion of the resorbed nutrients was used for leaf production for deciduous plants (Nambiar and Fife 1991; Sun et al. 2016). Younger larch individuals had relatively smaller and lighter needles whereas the older larch individuals had relatively bigger and heavier ones (our personal observation). The age-related changes of nutrient resorption were correlated with the annual leaf biomass production of larch plantations, which indicated that the nutrient requirement for growth, especially of leaves, was indeed a crucial determinant for nutrient resorption (Brant and Chen 2015; Sun et al. 2016). In addition, root uptake and leaf nutrient resorption are the two main sources for nutrient supply to support the growth of plants (Cleveland et al. 2013; Brant and Chen 2015). Although soil N increased with stand development, root N uptake from soil may be insufficient for the demand of larch individuals. Consequently, an increase in leaf NRE was observed to facilitate growth. Second, the increased nutrient resorption efficiency may be driven by the nutrients competition between larch individuals and the understory species. Because the understory species (e.g., shrub and grass) of the 10- and 21-year-old stands were relatively species-poor, whereas those of the 34- and 55-year-old stands were species-rich. Third, the increased NRE may be regulated by the increased PRE. Nutrient resorption is an important nutrient conservation mechanism for plants to reduce their dependence on soil nutrient supply, especially for those in infertile environment (Aerts 1996; Kobe et al. 2005; Yuan and Chen 2015). More N or P would be resorbed when plants are growing in N- or P-limited conditions (Han et al. 2013). Therefore, larch individuals would hydrolyze more immobile P to enhance PRE during leaf senescence, which resulted from a decrease of soil P concentration with increasing stand age. Due to the close relationship between N and P (Koerselman and Meuleman 1996; Treseder and Vitousek 2001; Vitousek et al. 2010; Deng et al. 2016), the process of P hydrolysis requires a greater cost of N (Hidaka and Kitayama 2011; Hofmann et al. 2016), and thus result in an increase of leaf NRE. This is also a possible explanation as to why NRE increased with increasing soil N but PRE increased with decreasing soil P. The diverse responses of NRE and PRE to respective soil N and P concentrations were further confirmed by the positively and negatively correlations between NRE and PRE with N and P concentrations in green leaves (Table 3). Taken together, since the process of resorption depends on environmental conditions and plant ecophysiologic traits (Mediavilla et al. 2014; Sun et al. 2016), perhaps NRE are more regulated by plant-soil system as a whole than by soil total N concentration per se in larch plantations.
Larch plantations would alter nutrient conservation and use strategy with stand age. To maximize N- and P-use efficiencies in the older stands, more conservative P-use strategies were observed, via increased PRE and decreased leaf P concentration. In contrast, a more conservative N-use strategy was obtained via increased NRE but not decreased leaf N concentration. Similar results were also found by Hayes et al. (2014) in plants of contrasting nutrient-acquisition strategies along a 2-million-year dune chronosequence. It is generally considered that nutrient resorption efficiency was negatively related with specific leaf nutrient concentrations (Kobe et al. 2005; Yuan and Chen 2010), because green leaf nutrient concentrations, in some instances, could reflect soil fertility (Aerts 1996; Lambers et al. 2008). In this study, partly agreed with our second hypothesis, NRE was positively correlated with green leaf N concentrations while PRE was negatively correlated with green leaf P concentrations (Table 3), indicating that green leaf nutrient concentration was good indicator for nutrient resorption efficiency, but the direction would vary with specific nutrient elements. Besides, soil total N was positively and significantly correlated with NRE, PRE and N:P ratio and negatively correlated with N and P concentrations in senesced leaves, but in contrast, only negative and significant relationship was observed between soil total P and senesced N:P ratio (Table 3), which suggested that soil total N was more closely linked with leaf nutrient status (e.g., nutrient resorption and leaf nutrient concentration) than soil total P. Our results supported the multiple-element explanations for nutrient resorption patterns proposed by See et al. (2015), which detected that soil N positively affects leaf P resorption in a northern hardwood forest. The tightly controlled plant-soil interactions would be of great importance for nutrient cycling and tree growth.
Implications for nutrient conservation and management
The significant correlations between N:P ratios of both green and senesced leaves with stand age (Fig. 1) impling that the growth of larch plantations tends to be more P-limited. Green leaf N:P ratios were 9.17, 10.78, 16.57 and 16.93 for the 10-, 21-, 34- and 55-year-old stands, respectively. Following the criteria proposed by Koerselman and Meuleman (1996), our results suggest that nutrient limitation status of larch plantations would shift from relative N-limitation to relative P-limitation across the chronosequence. In other words, the 10- and 21-year-old stands were relatively more N-limited, whereas the 34- and 55-year-old stands were relatively more P-limited (Fig. 1). Some previous studies have demonstrated that younger trees were more susceptible to N limitation (Laliberté et al. 2012; Mediavilla et al. 2014; Brant and Chen 2015), while evidence from Chen et al. (2016) showed P-deficiency in older Larix olgensis plantations (e.g., 34- and 49-year-old) in Northeast China. Similar findings have also been demonstrated by Hayes et al. (2014), which showed that long-term ecosystem development tended to cause a shift from N- to P-limitation in southwest Australia.
Additionally, our findings demonstrate a positive correlation between PRE:NRE and stand age (Fig. 2), indicating that relatively more P was resorbed with increased plantation age. This supported the relative resorption hypothesis that plants would resorb proportionally more N or P when under N- or P-limited conditions (Reed et al. 2012; Han et al. 2013). The relative changes of PRE and NRE gave further evidence for the N-limitation in young stands and P-limitation in old stands. The emerges of P limitation with stand development may be driven by the following reasons. First, P concentration in senesced leaves decreased and N:P ratios in senesced leaves increased across the chronosequence (Fig. 1). Compared with the younger stands, less P would remain in the leaf litter and return to the soils for the older stands, thus reduce the release of P from litter decomposition, and thereby reducing soil P availability (See et al. 2015). The positive plant-soil feedback may lead to more severe P-limitation for the older stands. Therefore, larch plantations would alter nutrient cycling through a plant-mediated pathway with stand age. Second, the decreased soil P may be caused by the decreased soil pH, which controls the solubility of P (Lambers et al. 2008; Kuznetsova et al. 2011; Barrow 2016). P nutrition may be improved via the decrease of soil pH, and more available P was absorbed and assimilated by trees (i.e., P sequestration in biomass) across the plantation chronosequence (Šourková et al. 2005; Kuznetsova et al. 2011). A substantial amount of the P sequestered in biomass was frequently removed from the sites by harvesting or thinning (Yan et al. 2017), and thus caused a decrease of soil total P with stand development (Deng et al. 2016). Third, input of P to the ecosystems mainly comes from rock weathering with an extremely slow rate (Wang et al. 2007; Achat et al. 2016). Therefore, P output may exceed P input for the ecosystem; thus, P recovers very slowly by natural processes (Gómez-García et al. 2016), consequently, results in a decrease of soil P concentration across the plantation chronosequence. Fourth, the continual increase in anthropogenic nitrogen (N) deposition relative to that of phosphorus (P) creates a strong imbalance in the inputs of N and P to the ecosystems, which in turn, may cause a shift in the temperate forest ecosystems from N- to P-limitation (Vitousek et al. 2010; Peñuelas et al. 2013; Deng et al. 2016). However, more N- and P- addition experiments are needed to assess whether the N- and P-limitation have truly been occurred with stand development of larch plantations. Furthermore, we have only measured soil P in the top layer (0–10 cm), and soil P in the deeper layers were remains unknown.
All in all, our results show that plant internal nutrient cycling during leaf senescence, soil pH, P sequestration in biomass and imbalanced inputs of N and P would contribute to the occurrence of P-limitation with increased stand age. Adaptive fertilization management strategies e.g., P fertilization, may be of particularly importance for older stands. Wang et al. (2007) showed that the introduction of N-fixing species could improve the soil N and P availabilities at N-limited sites. Because the N-fixing species would supply highly decomposable leaf-litter (via higher N concentration, Aerts 1997) to the soil, higher N input would stimulate soil phosphatase activity, and greatly enhance soil P availability and P cycling rates (Wang et al. 2007; Deng et al. 2016). Therefore, N-fixing species may produce more available P than they need and thus improve both soil N and P availabilities (Forrester et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2007; Houlton et al. 2008). These results suggested that it may be a potentially feasible practice to improve and balance the soil nutrients by planting N-fixing species in the reforestation (or afforestation) of larch plantations (Wang et al. 2011).
Larch is the dominant timber species in Northeast China, it would be common for thinning and clear-cutting during the management of larch plantations. Such silvicultural measures would remove large quantities of nutrients from the site, particularly for the harvesting associated with logging residues (e.g., bark, branches and leaves) (Yan et al. 2017). Furthermore, the nutrients resorbed during leaf senescence were mainly transported and stored in branch and stem-bark of deciduous plants (Cooke and Weih 2005; Estiarte and Peñuelas 2015). Combined nutrient resorption efficiency and leaf biomass, each tree harvesting in mid-October (i.e., when leaves were completely abscised) would increase the nutrient export with 55 g N and 4 g P, in comparison with tree harvesting in mid-August (i.e., when leaves were at peak biomass). Therefore, if logging residues (e.g., bark, branches and leaves) could be remained on the sites, i.e., only stem wood harvesting, we strongly recommended that tree harvesting should be carried out after August but before mid-October (i.e., before resorption occurred) to reduce nutrient loss, and maintain soil nutrient availability, consequently, induce the minimal effect on the growth of the remaining trees. It should note that further studies need to be done to confirm whether the above findings were representative of other plantations as well, because each stand in our study is just one relatively small forest stand and thus getting more information from additional sites would be valuable.
Conclusions
The nutrient resorption efficiency for both N and P and PRE:NRE were positively correlated with stand age of larch plantations, which indicated that the larch plantations become more conservative and efficient in using N and P and that relatively more P is resorbed with increased stand age. Decreased P concentration in senesced leaves and increased N:P ratios across the chronosequence would reduce litter quality and thus litter decomposition, which in turn creates a positive feedback on soil nutrient availability and may potentially lead to more severe P-limitation with stand age. Highly conservative P-use strategies were observed in the older stands that maximize P-use efficiency by maintaining higher PRE and lower leaf P concentration, while highly conservative N-use strategies were only obtained through higher NRE, but not through lower leaf N concentration. Based on leaf nutrient concentrations, green leaf N:P ratios and nutrient resorption, our results suggested that larch plantations may shift from N-limitation in the 10- and 21-year-old stands to P-limitation in the 34- and 55-year-old stands. In summary, our results demonstrate that the changes in nutrient resorption, soil pH, biomass P sequestration and imbalanced inputs of N and P would contribute to the occurrence of P-limitation with increased stand age in larch plantations, and P fertilization would be of great importance for the older stands. Additionally, if logging residues (e.g., bark, branches and leaves) could be retained on the sites, we recommended that tree harvesting should be implemented after August but before mid-October to reduce nutrient loss and potentially maintain soil nutrient availability.
References
Achat DL, Augusto L, Gallet-Budynek A, Loustau D (2016) Future challenges in coupled C–N–P cycle models for terrestrial ecosystems under global change: a review. Biogeochemistry 131:173–202
Aerts R (1996) Nutrient resorption from senescing leaves of perennials: are there general patterns? J Ecol 84:597–608
Aerts R (1997) Nitrogen partitioning between resorption and decomposition pathways: a trade-off between nitrogen use efficiency and litter decomposability? Oikos 80:603–606
Aerts R, Chapin FS (2000) The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Adv Ecol Res 30:1–67
Barrow NJ (2016) The effects of pH on phosphate uptake from the soil. Plant Soil 410:401–410
Brant AN, Chen HYH (2015) Patterns and mechanisms of nutrient resorption in plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci 34:471–486
Chen LX, Zhang C, Duan WB (2016) Temporal variations in phosphorus fractions and phosphatase activities in rhizosphere and bulk soil during the development of Larix olgensis plantations. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 179:67–77
Chinese Ministry of Forestry (2014) Forest Resource Statistics of China. Department of Forest Resource and Management, Beijing, China (In Chinese). http://www.forestry.gov.cn/. Accessed 26 June 2014
Cleveland CC, Houlton BZ, Smith WK, Marklein AR, Reed SC, Parton W, Grosso SJD, Running SW (2013) Patterns of new versus recycled primary production in the terrestrial biosphere. PNAS 110:12733–12737
Cooke JEK, Weih M (2005) Nitrogen storage and seasonal nitrogen cycling in Populus: bridging molecular physiology and ecophysiology. New Phytol 167:19–30
Deng MF, Liu LL, Sun ZZ, Piao SL, Ma YC, Chen YW, Wang J, Qiao CL, Wang X, Li P (2016) Increased phosphate uptake but not resorption alleviates phosphorus deficiency induced by nitrogen deposition in temperate Larix principis-rupprechtii plantations. New Phytol 212:1019–1029
Elser JJ, Bracken MES, Cleland EE, Gruner DS, Harpole WS, Hillebrand H, Ngai JT, Seabloom EW, Shurin JB, Smith JE (2007) Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 10:1135–1142
England JR, Attiwill PM (2006) Changes in leaf morphology and anatomy with tree age and height in the broadleaved evergreen species, Eucalyptus Regnans F. Muell. Trees 20:79–90
Estiarte M, Peñuelas J (2015) Alteration of the phenology of leaf senescence and fall in winter deciduous species by climate change: effects on nutrient proficiency. Glob Chang Biol 21:1005–1017
Forrester DI, Bauhus J, Cowie AL, Vanclay JK (2006) Mixed-species plantations of Eucalyptus with nitrogen-fixing trees: a review. For Ecol Manag 233:211–230
Gómez-García E, Diéguez-Aranda U, Cunha M, Rodríguez-Soalleiro R (2016) Comparison of harvest-related removal of aboveground biomass, carbon and nutrients in pedunculate oak stands and in fast-growing tree stands in NW Spain. For Ecol Manag 365:119–127
Gower ST, McMurtrie RE, Murty D (1996) Aboveground net primary production decline with stand age: potential causes. Trends Ecol Evol 11:378–382
Han WX, Tang LY, Chen YH, Fang JY (2013) Relationship between the relative limitation and resorption efficiency of nitrogen vs phosphorus in woody plants. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083366
Hayes P, Turner BL, Lambers H, Laliberté E (2014) Foliar nutrient concentrations and resorption efficiency in plants of contrasting nutrient-acquisition strategies along a 2-million-year dune chronosequence. J Ecol 102:396–410
Hidaka A, Kitayama K (2011) Allocation of foliar phosphorus fractions and leaf traits of tropical tree species in response to decreased soil phosphorus availability on mount Kinabalu, Borneo. J Ecol 99:849–857
Hofmann K, Heuck C, Spohn M (2016) Phosphorus resorption by young beech trees and soil phosphatase activity as dependent on phosphorus availability. Oecologia 181:369–379
Houlton BZ, Wang YP, Vitousek PM, Field CB (2008) A unifying framework for dinitrogen fixation in the terrestrial biosphere. Nature 454:327–334
Huang JY, HL Y, Lin H, Zhang Y, Searle EB, Yuan ZY (2016) Phosphorus amendment mitigates nitrogen addition-induced phosphorus limitation in two plant species. Plant Soil 399:221–232
Iversen CM, Norby RJ (2008) Nitrogen limitation in a sweetgum plantation: implications for carbon allocation and storage. Can J For Res 35:1021–1032
Killingbeck K, Whitford W (2001) Nutrient resorption in shrubs growing by design, and by default in Chihuahuan Desert arroyos. Oecologia 128:351–359
Kobe RK, Lepczyk CA, Iyer M (2005) Resorption efficiency decreases with increasing green leaf nutrients in a global data set. Ecology 86:2780–2792
Koerselman W, Meuleman AFM (1996) The vegetation N:P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. J Appl Ecol 33:1441–1450
Kuznetsova T, Lukjanova A, Mandre M, Lõhmus K (2011) Aboveground biomass and nutrient accumulation dynamics in young black alder, silver birch and scots. For Ecol Manag 262:56–64
Laliberté E, Turner BL, Costes T, Pearse SJ, Wyrwoll KH, Zemunik G, Lambers H (2012) Experimental assessment of nutrient limitation along a 2-million-year dune chronosequence in the south-western Australia biodiversity hotspot. J Ecol 100:631–642
Lambers H, Chapin FSI, Pons TL (2008) Plant physiological ecology. Springer, New York
Li YL, Chen J, Cui JY, Zhao XY, Zhang TH (2013) Nutrient resorption in Caragana microphylla along a chronosequence of plantations: implications for desertified land restoration in North China. Ecol Eng 53:299–305
Lü XT, Freschet GT, Flynn DFB, Han XG (2012) Plasticity in leaf and stem nutrient resorption proficiency potentially reinforces plant-soil feedbacks and microscale heterogeneity in a semi-arid grassland. J Ecol 100:144–150
Magnani F, Mencuccini M, Borghetti M, Berbigier P, Berninger F, Delzon S, Grelle A, Hari P, Jarvis PG, Kolari P, Kowalski AS, Lankreijer H, Law BE, Lindroth A, Loustau D, Manca G, Moncrieff JB, Rayment M, Tedeschi V, Valentini R, Grace J (2007) The human footprint in the carbon cycle of temperate and boreal forests. Nature 447:849–851
Mason WL, Zhu JJ (2014) Silviculture of planted forests managed formulti-functional objectives: lessons from Chinese and British experiences. In: Fenning T (ed) Challenges and opportunities for the world’s forests in the 21st century. Springer, New York, pp 37–54
May JD, Killingbeck KT (1992) Effects of preventing nutrient resorption on plant fitness and foliar nutrient dynamics. Ecology 73:1868–1878
Mediavilla S, Escudero A (2004) Stomatal responses to drought of mature trees and seedlings of two co-occurring Mediterranean oaks. For Ecol Manag 187:281–294
Mediavilla S, García-Iglesias J, González-Zurdo P, Escudero A (2014) Nitrogen resorption efficiency in mature trees and seedlings of four tree species co-occurring in a Mediterranean environment. Plant Soil 385:205–215
Nambiar EKS, Fife DN (1991) Nutrient retranslocation in temperate conifers. Tree Physiol 9:185–207
Peñuelas J, Poulter B, Sardans J, Ciais P, van der Velde M, Bopp L, Boucher O, Godderis Y, Hinsinger P, Llusia J, Nardin E, Vicca S, Obersteiner M, Janssens IA (2013) Human-induced nitrogen-phosphorus imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across the globe. Nat Commun 4:2934
Reed SC, Townsend AR, Davidson EA, Cleveland CC (2012) Stoichiometric patterns in foliar nutrient resorption across multiple scales. New Phytol 196:173–180
See CR, Yanai RD, Fisk MC, Vadeboncoeur MA, Quintero BA, Fahey TJ (2015) Soil nitrogen affects phosphorus recycling: foliar resorption and plant-soil feedbacks in a northern hardwood forest. Ecology 96:2488–2498
Šourková M, Frouz J, Šantrủčková H (2005) Accumulation of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus during soil formation on alder spoil heaps after brown-coal mining, near Sokolov (Czech Republic). Geoderma 124:203–214
Sun ZZ, Liu LL, Peng SS, Peñuelas J, Zeng H, Piao SL (2016) Age-related modulation of the nitrogen resorption efficiency response to growth requirements and soil nitrogen availability in a temperate pine plantation. Ecosystems 19:698–709
Treseder KK, Vitousek PM (2001) Effects of soil nutrient availability on investment in acquisition of N and P in Hawaiian rain forests. Ecology 82:946–954
Tully KL, Wood TE, Schwantes AM, Lawrence D (2013) Soil nutrient availability and reproductive effort drive patterns in nutrient resorption in Pentaclethra macroloba. Ecology 94:930–940
van Heerwaarden LM, Toet S, Aerts R (2003) Current measures of nutrient resorption efficiency lead to a substantial underestimation of real resorption efficiency: facts and solutions. Oikos 101:664–669
Vergutz L, Manzoni S, Porporato A, Novais RF, Jackson RB (2012) Global resorption efficiencies and concentrations of carbon and nutrients in leaves of terrestrial plants. Ecol Monogr 82:205–220
Vitousek PM, Howarth RW (1991) Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: how can it occur? Biogeochemistry 13:87–115
Vitousek PM, Porder S, Houlton BZ, Chadwick OA (2010) Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen-phosphorus interactions. Ecol Appl 20:5–15
Wang YP, Houlton BZ, Field CB (2007) A model of biogeochemical cycles of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus including symbiotic nitrogen fixation and phosphatase production. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002797
Wang WJ, Qiu L, YG Z, DX S, An J, Wang HY, Zheng GY, Sun W, Chen QG (2011) Changes in soil organic carbon, nitrogen, pH and bulk density with the development of larch (Larix gmelinii) plantations in China. Glob Chang Biol 17:2657–2676
Wang ZN, JY L, Yang HM, Zhang X, Luo CL, Zhao YX (2014) Resorption of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium from leaves of lucerne stands of different ages. Plant Soil 383:301–312
Wright IJ, Westoby M (2003) Nutrient concentration, resorption and lifespan: leaf traits of Australian sclerophyll species. Funct Ecol 17:10–19
Yan T, Lü XT, Yang K, Zhu JJ (2016) Leaf nutrient dynamics and nutrient resorption: a comparison between larch plantations and adjacent secondary forests in Northeast China. J Plant Ecol 9:165–173
Yan T, Zhu JJ, Yang K, LZ Y, Zhang JX (2017) Nutrient removal under different harvesting scenarios for larch plantations in northeast China: implications for nutrient conservation and management. For Ecol Manag 400:150–158
Yang K, Zhu JJ (2015) Impact of tree litter decomposition on soil biochemical properties obtained from a temperate secondary forest in Northeast China. J Soils Sediments 15:13–23
Yang K, Shi W, Zhu JJ (2013) The impact of secondary forests conversion into larch plantations on soil chemical and microbiological properties. Plant Soil 368:535–546
Yuan ZY, Chen HYH (2010) Changes in nitrogen resorption of trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) with stand development. Plant Soil 327:121–129
Yuan ZY, Chen HYH (2015) Negative effects of fertilization on plant nutrient resorption. Ecology 96:373–380
Zhou LL, Addo-Danso SD, PF W, Li SB, Zou XH, Zhang Y, Ma XQ (2016) Leaf resorption efficiency in relation to foliar and soil nutrient concentrations and stoichiometry of Cunninghamia lanceolata with stand development in southern China. J Soils Sediments 16:1448–1459
Zhu JJ, Mao ZH, LL H, Zhang JX (2007) Plant diversity of secondary forests in response to anthropogenic disturbance levels in montane regions of northeastern China. J For Res 12:403–416
Zhu JJ, Liu ZG, Wang HX, Yan QL, Fang HY, LL H, LZ Y (2008) Effects of site preparation on emergence and early establishment of Larix olgensis in montane regions of northeastern China. New For 36:247–260
Zhu JJ, Yang K, Yan QL, Liu ZG, LZ Y, Wang HX (2010) Feasibility of implementing thinning in even-aged Larix olgensis plantations to develop uneven-aged larch-broadleaved mixed forests. J For Res 15:71–80
Acknowledgements
We thank Ms. Peng Jiang and Ms. Jing Wang for their laboratory assistance and Dr. Qiaoling Yan and Ms. Huanhuan Song for their helpful suggestions on the earlier versions of this manuscript. This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (grant numbers 2012CB416906 and 2012CB416903).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Hans Lambers
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yan, T., Lü, XT., Zhu, JJ. et al. Changes in nitrogen and phosphorus cycling suggest a transition to phosphorus limitation with the stand development of larch plantations. Plant Soil 422, 385–396 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3473-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3473-9