Introduction

VRFBs are developed to be one of the most commercially mature redox flow battery due to the characteristics of high energy efficiency, flexible design and low maintenance cost [1,2,3]. Electrode materials are critical component of VRFBs as they provide the sites for the redox reactions, even though they do not directly participate in the redox process as reactants [4]. CF has been widely used as the electrode material in VRFB systems, owing to its outstanding electrical conductivity, high stability, and cost advantage [5, 6]. However, the electrochemical performance of pristine CF electrode still needs improvement to further increase the efficiency of the VRFBs. Therefore, surface modification is necessary to enhance the reversibility in battery reactions, subsequently improving the energy efficiency and power density of VRFBs.

The common methods for CF modification include chemical reaction [7, 8], heat treatment [9, 10], microwave treatment [11] and plasma treatment [12,13,14,15]. Compared to other surface modification techniques, plasma modification presents several advantages, such as rapid processing, high energy density, and controllable gas conditions [16,17,18,19]. Huang et al. [13] used nitrogen and oxygen plasma (13.56 MHz RF source) to modify the CF electrode at low pressure and 200W. The modification improved the energy efficiency of VRFB from 65 to 78% with good cycling stability. However, general low-pressure plasma modification requires vacuum system and complex operational processes. Recently, atmospheric pressure plasma has been widely used for material modification due to its simplicity and high efficiency [20, 21]. Limited literatures have reported of CFs modification by using atmospheric pressure plasma for VRFBs efficiency improvement [22,23,24]. Lin et al. [23] used the nitrogen plasma jets to prepare a high performance CF electrode at atmospheric pressure, resulted in the energy efficiency of VRFB increased from 67.9% to 77.6%. Considering the large-scale uniform treatment and reduced the consumption of working gas, atmospheric dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) modification is more favorable than other plasma modification.

In this work, we employ atmospheric DBD to modify the commercial CF materials (with an initial EE as high as 76%) for VRFB efficiency improvement. By changing the composition of the working gas and treatment time, we systematically investigated the modification of CF on VRFB efficiency. We measured the VE, CE, and EE of the VRFB before and after CF modification, and optimized the modification parameters. Additionally, we employed XPS, SEM, and electrolyte/water contact angle measurements to explore the mechanisms behind the improvement of battery efficiency in VRFBs after DBD modification.

Experimental Setup and Measurements

Materials

Commercial CF (China, Haote new material company) was used as electrodes (3 cm × 3 cm × 0.4 cm in size) for electrochemical measurements in this work. Nafion membrane (China, Thinkre new material, N212, 54 μm) separated the positive and negative electrodes, facilitating ion exchange and redox reactions. The graphite sheets (China, Jinglong Carbon Company) were designed with a snake-shaped channel on the surface, which facilitates the flow of electrolytes. Figure 1a displays the assembly diagram and internal constitution of a single VRFB cell, which consists of a Nafion membrane, carbon felts, fluoro-rubber mats, graphite sheets, and copper plates.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Single-cell assembly used for VRFB efficiency tests. b Schematic diagram of experimental setup

Experimental Setup

Figure 1b shows a schematic diagram of the experimental setup. Two copper electrodes (30 mm in diameter and 14 mm in high) wrapped in polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) were mounted inside an acrylic cylindrical chamber. Two SiO2 dielectric plates with diameter of 80-mm and thickness of 1 mm were attached to the copper electrodes as dielectric. The CF was placed on the lower dielectric plate during treatment. The discharge gap (from the up side of the CF to the surface of the upper dielectric plate) was fixed at 2 mm. A high-voltage AC power was used to generate plasma in the discharge gap. The frequency of was fixed at 20 kHz. Two quartz windows (40 mm square) were mounted on the sidewall of the chamber for spectroscopic analysis.

In this study, N2 and O2 mixture were used as the working gases. To investigate the gas composition on the modification effect, four groups of working gases were employed, as shown in Table 1. The flow rate was regulated by flow meters, and for all the experiments, the total gas flow rate was fixed at 1L/min. For all the experiments, the chamber was purged with related working gas for 5 min to evacuate air before discharge.

Table 1 Four groups of discharge gases used in this study

Measurements and Methods

The discharge power was calculated using the Lissajous method [25], with a 10nF capacitor connected in series to the circuit. The voltage across the capacitor was measured using a differential probe (Tektronix, P5200A). The applied voltage and current were measured using a high-voltage probe (Tektronix, P6015A) and a current probe (Pearson, P6585), respectively. The optical emission spectrum (OES) was measured by using a spectrometer (AndorS, R-500I-A) equipped with a photomultiplier tube (Zolix, PMTH-S1).

The surface morphology of the CF was detected using a field scanning electron microscope (FSEM, FEI, Sirion200). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were conducted by AXIS-ULTRA (Kratos, DLD-600W) photoelectron spectrometer. The surface hydrophilicity was assessed by contact angle, using a water drop angle meter (SINDIN, SDC-500).

The single cell tests were conducted using a power cell tester (NEWARE, CT4008), as shown in Fig. 2a. The current density for constant current charge–discharge tests was set to 22 mA/cm2. The charge cut-off voltage was set to 1.6 V, and the discharge voltage was set to 0.9 V. The charge–discharge curves, as illustrated in Fig. 2b, were recorded to investigate the impact of CF modification on battery efficiency. The CE, VE, and EE were calculated using the following equations, respectively [24]:

$${\text{VE}} = \frac{{V_{d} }}{{V_{c} }} \times 100\%$$
(1)
$${\text{CE}} = \frac{{Q_{d} }}{{Q_{c} }} \times 100{\text{\% }}$$
(2)
$${\text{EE}} = {\text{VE}} \times {\text{CE}}$$
(3)

where \(V_{d}\) is the discharge midpoint voltage (V), \(V_{c}\) is the charging midpoint voltage (V), \(Q_{d}\) is discharge capacity (Ah), \(Q_{c}\) is the charging capacity (Ah).

Fig. 2
figure 2

a Schematic diagram of single cell test, b Charge–discharge curves of VRFBs

Results and Discussions

Plasma Parameters

Figure 3a shows the typical voltage and current waveforms during treatment. The Vp–p of AC voltage was 25 kV and the frequency was fixed at 20 kHz. The discharge power for all the treatments the power was fixed at 25 W. Figure 3b presents the discharge images under various gas compositions. The intensity of the discharge increases with the reduction of O2 content as expected.

Fig. 3
figure 3

a Applied voltage and current waveforms; b Discharge images under various discharge gas

The OES results under different working gases are shown in Fig. 4. The major optical emission lines from atomic N, O, and the first positive band (FPS) and the second positive band (SPS) of N2 as well as N2+ are observed [26, 27]. The spectral intensity becomes stronger as the proportion of N2 increases in the N2/O2 mixture, which is consistent with the discharge intensity. In the N2 (100%) group, very weak emission of O at 777.2 nm was detected. The reason is that the whole chamber was not well sealed, and even we purged the gas inside the chamber for several minutes before treatment, the air could not be completely exhausted. Therefore, very little content of air still existed in the N2 (100%) group.

Fig. 4
figure 4

OES under various discharge gas

The Modification Effect of Discharge Gas on VRFB Efficiency

Figure 5 shows the VE, CE, and EE of VRFB after CF modification with various discharge gas compositions. After a 5-min DBD treatment, the efficiency of each cell gradually improves with increasing proportion of N2 in the discharge gas. Compared to the untreated CF, the battery exhibits improvements in VE from 87 to 96%, CE from 85 to 90%, and EE from 76 to 86%.

Fig. 5
figure 5

VE, CE and EE of VRFB with CF modification under various discharge gas

The observed enhancement in this experiment is close to that in other studies using non-commercial CF [13, 22]. However, the CFs used in those studies had a much lower EE before modification, which falls considerably short of the commercial market standards. In contrast, the CF utilized in this study already achieved an EE of 76% before modification, and a 13.2% improvement on this basis represents a significant enhancement.

The Effect of Treatment Time on VRFB Efficiency

Based on the previous experiments, the modification result of N2 (100%) as the discharge gas has shown the most significant impact on improving VRFB efficiency. Therefore, we further investigated the effect of the time gradient on VRFB efficiency. Figure 6 displays the voltage data of the first charge–discharge cycle of single cell treated with N2 plasma. The charge–discharge curves reveal that with an increase in treatment time, the batteries shows a decrease in charge inception voltage and an increase in discharge inception voltage. Additionally, the cycle time of batteries become longer, which indicates that the VRFB has lower internal resistance and greater capacity after plasma modification.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Charge–discharge curves of VRFBs for various treatment time of N2 DBD treatment

Figure 7 illustrates the VE, CE, and EE of VRFB after N2 plasma treatment vs. treatment time. All the efficiency of VRFB show an increasing trend with the increase of the treatment time. When up to 10 min, the VE increases from 86 to 97%, the CE increases from 85 to 91%, and the EE increases from 76 to 87%. Notably, after 7 min of treatment, the enhancement maintains at a satisfactory level and hardly to be further increased with the treatment time.

Fig. 7
figure 7

The change of VE, CE and EE vs. treatment time

The Properties of the CF Materials After Plasma Modification

In order to investigate the mechanism of the plasma modification of CFs on the enhancement of the VRFB efficiency, the material properties of the CFs before and after plasma treatment were detected and analyzed.

Figure 8 shows both the electrolyte and water contact angle results of the CFs vs. treatment time. The electrolyte contact angle and water contact angle on CF surface under the same condition are similar and both significantly decreases with the DBD modification time. The CF surface reaches complete hydrophilicity after 7 min and 10 min treatment, with a contact angle of 0°, as evidenced by the penetration of droplets into the CFs.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Electrolyte and water contact angle of CF after N2 DBD treatment vs. treatment time

Interestingly, there is a growing trend in both hydrophilicity and the battery efficiency. With the extension of treatment time: the hydrophilicity and efficiency both significantly increased in the 1–5 min treated samples; and after 7–10 min treatment, when the CFs were completely hydrophilic, the VRFB efficiency hardly increased with further treatment. These results indicate that the DBD treatment can effectively enhance the VRFB efficiency through increasing the hydrophilicity of the CF surface.

XPS was employed to investigate the changes in surface chemical composition. The original and fitting results for the C1s and O1s components for pristine and CF treated with N2 plasma for 5 min are shown in Fig. 9 as an example. The data indicates that the content of C decreases after plasma treatment, the area of the C–C bond peak decreases, and the area of the oxygen-containing functional group peaks increases.

Fig. 9
figure 9

a XPS survey spectra of untreated CF of (i) full spectrum (ii) C1s and (iii) O1s. b XPS survey spectra of plasma-treated CF of (i) full spectrum (ii) C1s and (iii) O1s

The atomic content change on the CF surface vs. treatment time is summarized in Table 2. The C content decreases from 97.9% to a minimum value of 82.7% after 10 min of plasma treatment, while the N and O contents both increases. The O increase in the treated sample can be attributed to the following reasons as we mentioned in Section "Plasma Parameters": Firstly, the chamber is not possible to achieve complete sealing and residual air inside cannot be fully eliminated. Even with 100% N2 introduced into the chamber, a small amount of O2 may still be involved in the reaction. Secondly, plasma treatment can create structural defects [28], thus the unsaturated carbon atoms reacted with either oxygen attracted in the porous CF materials or the environmental oxygen to increase the O content. The detection of O element in the untreated CF also supported this hypothesis.

Table 2 Atomic content change on the CF surface vs. treatment time of N2 DBD treatment

Table 3 presents the composition ratio of functional groups obtained from the curve fitting of C1s and O1s XPS spectrum. The C–C content decreases from 62.86% to 43.93% after 10 min treatment, and the C–OH content decreases from 100% to 45.63%. The oxygen-containing functional groups of C–O and C=O increases, which are known to be electrochemically active sites for vanadium redox reaction [13, 29]. In the O1s curve fitting, the functional groups were primarily C–OH before treatment, and the majority of which were oxidized into C=O after modification.

Table 3 Chemical composition ratio of functional groups from curve fitting of C1s and O1s XPS spectra for various treatment time of N2 plasma treatment

Furthermore, the surface morphology was observed by SEM, as shown in Fig. 10. The results show that plasma modification not only increases the nitrogen and oxygen content but also causes physical change on the carbon fibers, leading to an increase in surface roughness. The pristine fibers had a smooth and flat surface, while the surface of the modified fibers exhibit dents that were caused by the etching effect of the DBD treatment.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Morphological change of the pristine and N2 DBD-treated CFs by SEM with 5000 times magnification

Therefore, the increased oxygen functional groups (such as C–O, C=O) cause the improvement of the CF hydrophilicity [24], changing it from hydrophobic to hydrophilic. The increased roughness and oxygen functional groups both increase the reaction area and provide more active sites for the vanadium redox reactions then enhance the VRFB efficiency.

Conclusion

In this study, we further improved the VRFB efficiency by modification of the commercial CF electrode using atmospheric DBD. We optimized the modification conditions by altering the discharge gas composition and the treatment time, and found that the CE, VE and EE of the VRFB increased with the increase of N2 ratio in the N2/O2 mixture and the treatment time. The VE, CE and EE reached up to an improvement of 12.8%, 7% and 13.2% after 10 min of N2 DBD treatment, respectively. The CF hydrophilicity was found to be closely relate to the VRFB efficiency, in which the decrease of the electrolyte and water contact angle corresponds to the increase of the VRFB efficiency. The increased surface roughness and the hydrophilic functional groups after DBD treatment can provide more active sites for the redox reaction and increase the reaction area for the electrode, which further improved the VRFB efficiency.