Abstract
Monoamine oxidase (MAO) are flavoenzymes that metabolize neurotransmitter, dietary and xenobiotic amines to their corresponding aldehydes with the production of hydrogen peroxide. Two isoforms, MAO-A and MAO-B, are expressed in humans and mammals, and display different substrate and inhibitor specificities as well as different physiological roles. MAO inhibitors are of much therapeutic value and are used for the treatment of neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders such as depression, anxiety disorders, and Parkinson’s disease. To discover MAO inhibitors with good potencies and interesting isoform specificities, the present study synthesized a series of 2,1-benzisoxazole (anthranil) derivatives and evaluated them as in vitro inhibitors of human MAO. The compounds were in most instances specific inhibitors of MAO-B with the most potent MAO-B inhibition observed for 7a (IC50 = 0.017 µM) and 7b (IC50 = 0.098 µM). The most potent MAO-A inhibition was observed for 3l (IC50 = 5.35 µM) and 5 (IC50 = 3.29 µM). It is interesting to note that 3-(2-aminoethoxy)-1,2-benzisoxazole derivatives, the 1,2-benzisoxazole, zonisamide, as well as the isoxazole compound, leflunomide, have been described as MAO inhibitors. This is however the first report of MAO inhibition by derivatives of the 2,1-benzisoxazole structural isomer.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The monoamine oxidase (MAO) enzymes are flavoenzymes that are bound to the outer membranes of mitochondria [1]. MAO catalyzes the α-carbon oxidation of neurotransmitter, dietary, and xenobiotic amines to yield the corresponding aldehydes, ammonia (for primary amine substrates) and hydrogen peroxide [2]. Two isoforms, MAO-A and MAO-B, are expressed in humans and mammals and are products of distinct genes [3, 4]. The two isoforms exhibit different tissue distributions, substrate and inhibitor specificities and physiological roles. For example, serotonin is a specific substrate for MAO-A, while benzylamine and phenethylamine are MAO-B specific substrates [5]. Certain amine compounds such as dopamine, epinephrine, norepinephrine, and tyramine are substrates for both MAO isoforms. Since MAO metabolizes neurotransmitters and other biogenic amines, they are of physiological and therapeutic importance. In this respect, MAO-A inhibitors have been used for decades for the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders while MAO-B inhibitors are used for Parkinson’s disease therapy, often in combination with levodopa, the metabolic precursor of dopamine [5]. In Parkinson’s disease, MAO-B inhibitors provide symptomatic benefit by reducing the MAO-mediated metabolism of dopamine in the brain [6, 7]. The use of MAO-A inhibitors in depression is based on the monoamine hypothesis of depression, and an antidepressant effect is obtained by enhancing central serotonin and norepinephrine levels [8,9,10].
Although MAO inhibitors act by increasing the biological half-lives of monoamine neurotransmitters, they also reduce the formation of the metabolic by-products of the MAO catalytic cycle. Hydrogen peroxide that is generated by the reduction of molecular oxygen during MAO catalysis may be converted to injurious oxygen species in the brain, and may contribute to neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease [2]. MAO-B inhibitors have thus been advocated as potential neuroprotective agents that may delay neurodegeneration by reducing oxidative damage to susceptible neuronal tissues. The production of hydrogen peroxide by MAO-A in the heart and resultant oxidative damage to mitochondria, in turn, have been linked to heart failure [11, 12]. MAO-A inhibitors may thus have a future role in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Finally, growth and metastasis of prostate cancer is reduced by MAO inhibitors in pre-clinical models while clinical evidence has demonstrated that MAO inhibitors (e.g., phenelzine) may represent a new treatment for prostate cancer [13, 14].
Based on their current and future clinical applications as well as an academic interest in the discovery of new MAO inhibitors [15], the present study synthesized a series of 2,1-benzisoxazole (anthranil) derivatives and evaluated them as in vitro inhibitors of human MAO (Fig. 1). This is the first report of MAO inhibition by 2,1-benzisoxazoles, however, derivatives of the structural isomer, 1,2-benzisoxazole, have been reported to inhibit MAO. For example, 3-(2-aminoethoxy)-1,2-benzisoxazole derivatives (e.g., RS-1636), the 1,2-benzisoxazole, zonisamide, as well as the isoxazole compound, leflunomide, have been described as MAO inhibitors [16,17,18]. Zonisamide is of particular interest since the X-ray crystal structure of this compound in complex with human MAO-B has been reported [19]. Zonisamide is a competitive inhibitor of human MAO-B (Ki = 3.1 μM) and binds reversibly to the substrate cavity of the enzyme. Interestingly, like safinamide bound to MAO-B, zonisamide binds to MAO-B with the Ile-199 gating residue in the “open” conformation [20]. In contrast, when the small molecule inhibitor, isatin, binds to MAO-B, the Ile-199 residue adopts the “closed” conformation [21]. This study synthesized a series of 2,1-benzisoxazole derivatives with divergent structures with respect to the substituents and substitution patterns. The selection of the derivatives was primarily based on synthetic feasibility and derivatives were obtained by a method developed by us earlier. While the 2,1-benzisoxazole derivatives were not designed with a specific medicinal chemistry rationale in mind, this is an exploratory study to evaluate the possibility that the 2,1-benzisoxazole moiety could be used as scaffold for the future design of MAO inhibitors.
Results and discussion
Chemistry
A variety of clinically used drugs are benzisoxazole derivatives (e.g., leflunomide, oxacillin, dicloxacillin, danazol, risperidone, and zonisamide). Several methods are known for the synthesis of 2,1-benzisoxazoles from ortho-substituted benzene derivatives that contain substituents suitable for cyclization to yield the fused isoxazole ring [22, 23]. In this work, an experimental series of 2,1-benzisoxazoles was obtained by our earlier developed method of condensation of nitroaromatic substrates with arylacetonitriles by heating in an alcoholic alkaline medium (Fig. 2) [24]. This transformation proceeds smoothly only if there is a substituent on the para-position of nitroaromatic substrate 1. In addition, the formation of 2,1-benzisoxazoles is not observed for nitro compounds containing donor groups on the para-position, such as primary, secondary or tertiary amino groups, methyl or hydroxyl groups. In addition, the substituent should not be an active nucleofuge under the reaction conditions or easily enters into nucleophilic addition reactions. Despite these limitations, this reaction was used to synthesize a diverse series of 2,1-benzisoxazole derivatives 3a–o that are suitable for probing the structure–activity relationships of this class. The bis-condensation product 5 was obtained in a similar manner.
For the synthesis of 7a–c, a new approach was used with 4-cyanophenylmethyl-substituted triazole as reagent instead of an arylacetonitrile (Fig. 3). It is postulated that during the reaction, the 1,2,4-triazole fragment stabilizes the carbanion of the methylene group of reagent 6 due to its electron-withdrawing properties, and during the second stage it acts as a leaving group. As a result, the ring closes to form the benzisoxazole compounds 7a–c. We believe that this synthetic protocol is the more accessible and safe modification of that reported in Fig. 2 due to the absence of cyanide-containing waste. Also, Reagent 6 is a commercially available intermediate used in the synthesis of the active pharmaceutical ingredient letrozole [25]. Similar N-alkylated triazoles are readily available by reaction between sodium triazolate and the corresponding benzyl halide [26]. It should be noted that for this transformation, the same restrictions on the structure of the nitroaromatic substrates apply as described for Fig. 2. The structures of all the synthesized compounds were confirmed by NMR spectroscopy and high-resolution mass spectrometry. Moreover, the structure of 3c was established by X-ray diffraction analysis (Fig. 4).
MAO inhibition studies
The MAO inhibition properties of the 2,1-benzisoxazole derivatives were investigated using the commercially available recombinant human MAO-A and MAO-B enzymes with kynuramine serving as substrate [27, 28]. MAO oxidizes kynuramine to yield 4-hydroxyquinoline, which was measured by fluorescence spectrophotometry [27, 28]. By measuring MAO catalytic rate in the presence of a range of inhibitor concentrations (0.003–100 µM), sigmoidal plots of rate versus the logarithm of inhibitor concentration were constructed from which IC50 values were estimated (Fig. 5). The IC50 values are presented in Table 1 and show that the 2,1-benzisoxazole derivatives are indeed MAO inhibitors.
From the MAO-B inhibition data, the following observations and structure–activity relationships are apparent: (a) The most potent MAO-B inhibition was observed for 7a (IC50 = 0.017 µM) and 7b (IC50 = 0.098 µM) while the most potent MAO-A inhibition was observed for 5 (IC50 = 3.29 µM) and 3l (IC50 = 5.35 µM); (b) With the exception, of 5 and 3l, all compounds displayed specificity for the MAO-B isoform. Compounds 7a and 7b may be highlighted as displaying high specificity and potency for MAO-B; (c) The most potent MAO-B inhibition was observed for the p-benzonitrile substituted compounds 7a–c, which demonstrates that this group is more optimal than the other aryl groups considered. Thus, 7b was at least 12-fold more potent than the corresponding p-tolyl (3c), phenyl (3j), p-Br-phenyl (3m), p-Cl-phenyl (3n) and p-OCH3-phenyl (3o) homologues. Similarly, 7c was more potent than the phenyl homologue 3e; (d) Among the iodo derivatives, the p-OCH3-phenyl (3a), p-Cl-phenyl (3b) and tolyl (3i) substituted compounds were the most potent MAO-B inhibitors with IC50 < 6.59 µM. Weaker MAO-B inhibition was observed with the phenyl (3h; IC50 < 16.3 µM) which demonstrates the requirement of a substituent on the phenyl; (e) Among the halogens on C5, chloro substitution (3j) led to slightly more potent MAO-B inhibition than bromo substitution (3g), while iodo substitution (3h) resulted in comparatively weak inhibition. Larger groups such as 1,3-dioxolanyl (e.g., 3l) on C5 also yielded lower potency MAO-B inhibitors; (f) Interestingly, the two compounds substituted with the large 5-methyl-1,2,4-oxadiazolyl group (3e and 7c) displayed good MAO-B inhibition potency. In fact, 7c was the third most potent MAO-B inhibitor of the series. This finding shows that a large group on C6 is well tolerated for MAO-B inhibition.
From the MAO-A inhibition data, the following observations and structure–activity relationships are apparent: (a) The most potent MAO-A inhibition was observed for 5 (IC50 = 3.29 µM) and 3l (IC50 = 5.35 µM). Compound 5 is the bis-condensation product; (b) As mentioned above, only 5 and 3l displayed specificity for the MAO-A isoform, although only by a small degree; (c) Among the C5 chloro substituted compounds the p-tolyl (3c) and phenyl (3j) substituted compounds were more optimal than the other aryl groups considered [e.g., p-Br-phenyl (3m), p-Cl-phenyl (3n) and p-benzonitrile (7b)]; (d) The C5 iodo and bromo derivatives proved to be relatively weak MAO-A inhibitors with IC50 > 17.7 µM; (e) Among the halogens on C5, chloro substitution (3j) led to more potent MAO-A inhibition than iodo (3h) and bromo substitution (3g); (f) Interestingly, the 1,3-dioxolanyl substituted compound (3l) yielded good MAO-A inhibition (IC50 = 5.35 µM).
Competitive mode of MAO inhibition
To obtain insight into the modes of inhibition of the 2,1-benzisoxazoles, Lineweaver–Burk plots for the inhibition of MAO-A and MAO-B by 3l and 7a, respectively, were constructed. These two compounds represent potent MAO inhibitors among the study compounds. For each compound, a set of Lineweaver–Burk plots were constructed at the following inhibitor concentrations: 0 × IC50, ¼ × IC50, ½ × IC50, ¾ × IC50, 1 × IC50 and 1¼ × IC50. Each line of the Lineweaver–Burk plots was constructed with the kynuramine concentration ranging from 15 to 250 μM. The Lineweaver–Burk plots for the inhibition of MAO by 3l and 7a are presented in Fig. 6 and show that in both instances the lines intersect on the y-axis which is indicative of competitive and therefore reversible inhibition. From a replot of the slopes of the Lineweaver–Burk plots versus inhibitor concentration, a Ki value of 0.46 µM is estimated for the inhibition of MAO-A by 3l (Ki = −x when y = 0). For the inhibition of MAO-B by 7a, a Ki value of 0.0062 µM is estimated. The Ki values have also been determined by global (shared) fitting of the inhibition data to the Michaelis–Menten equation: 0.50 ± 0.024 µM (3l, MAO-A) and 0.010 ± 0.0015 µM (7a, MAO-B).
Molecular docking
As mentioned, the X-ray crystal structure of zonisamide, a 1,2-benzisoxazole compound, in complex with MAO-B has been reported [19]. Zonisamide binds within the substrate cavity of the enzyme with the Ile-199 gating residue in the “open” conformation [20]. A molecular docking study was carried out with the Discovery Studio software according to the reported protocol with the aim of predicting the binding orientation of 7a to MAO-B, using the structure of zonisamide bound to MAO-B (PDB code: 3PO7) [28]. The result shows that the binding of 7a differs significantly from zonisamide with 7a extending much deeper into the entrance cavity (Fig. 7). The 2,1-benzisoxazole ring thus binds within the entrance cavity where stabilization occurs via van der Waals interactions. Within the entrance cavity, the contribution of the chloro groups to inhibitor stabilization appears to be additive since 7a is a more potent MAO-B inhibitor than 7b, the mono-chloro substituted compound. The benzonitrile moiety is placed in the substrate cavity where the nitrile may undergo hydrogen bonding with a water molecule. This polar interaction by the nitrile may explain the finding that the p-benzonitrile substituted compounds 7a–c were the most potent MAO-B inhibitors of this study. Other stabilizing interactions include π···π stacking and lp(S)···π interactions of both the phenyl and isoxazole with Tyr-326 and Cys-172, respectively, as well as a π···σ interaction the fused phenyl of the 2,1-benzisoxazole ring with Ile-199.
The binding of 3l, a potent MAO-A inhibitor of this study, was also investigated by molecular docking, using the X-ray crystal structure of harmine bound to MAO-A (PDB code: 2Z5X) [28, 29]. Compound 3l binds in the MAO-A active with the 1,3-dioxolanyl ring in proximity to the FAD, while the phenyl extends towards the entrance of the active site. While no hydrogen bonding is predicted, a lp(S)···π interaction between the phenyl substituent and Cys-323 may occur. Most interactions, however, are van der Waals interactions with active site residues.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study discovers three p-benzonitrile substituted compounds (7a–c) with submicromolar MAO-B inhibition potencies. While the 2,1-benzisoxazole ring contributes to inhibitor stabilization via π···π stacking, lp···π and van der Waals interactions, it does not seem to be a privileged structure for MAO-B inhibition. The 2,1-benzisoxazole ring, however, is suitable as a scaffold on which appropriate groups could be substituted. For MAO-B inhibition, p-benzonitrile substitution on the isoxazole ring and choro substitutions on C5 and C7 of the fused phenyl of the 2,1-benzisoxazole moiety are appropriate for potent MAO-B inhibition. 2,1-Benzisoxazole compounds such as 7a may represent good leads for the future design of MAO-B specific inhibitors. To assess the possibility that 7a might be developed as a drug, key physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties were estimated with the SwissADME web tool provided by the Swiss Institute of Informatics (www.swissadme.ch) [30]. 7a is predicted to have a log P of 3.89, to display moderate aqueous solubility, high absorption from the gastrointestinal track and to be able to penetrate the blood–brain barrier. Based on these calculations, 7a could be an orally active MAO inhibitor with activity in the central nervous system, and this compound would therefore be a good candidate for preclinical studies.
Experimental section
Reagents and instrumentation
All reagents and solvents were obtained from commercial sources and were used without purification. DMSO was dried over molecular sieves (4 Å). Reactions were monitored by analytical thin layer chromatography (TLC) using Macherey–Nagel TLC sheets (Silufol UV-254) and the developed sheets were visualized under UV light. NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker AVANCE DPX 400 at 400 MHz and 101 MHz for 1H and 13C, respectively. Chemical shifts are reported as parts per million (δ, ppm) and were referenced to the residual solvent peaks for 1H spectra (7.26 ppm for CDCl3 and 2.50 ppm for DMSO-d6) and to carbon peaks of the solvent for 13C (39.52 ppm for DMSO-d6 and 77.16 ppm for CDCl3). Multiplicities are abbreviated as follows: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; m, multiplet; br, broad. Coupling constants, J, are reported in Hertz (Hz). Melting points were determined in open capillary tubes with an Electrothermal IA 9300 series digital melting point apparatus. High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were recorded with a Bruker maXis HRMS-ESI-QTOF instrument (ESI mode).
X-ray diffraction data were collected at a Rigaku SuperNova diffractometer using Cu–Kα (λ = 0.154184 nm) radiation. The structure has been solved with the ShelXT structure solution program using Intrinsic Phasing and refined with the ShelXL refinement package incorporated in the OLEX2 program package using Least Squares minimization [31,32,33]. The carbon-bound H atoms were placed in calculated positions. Empirical absorption correction was applied in the CrysAlisPro program complex (Agilent Technologies, 2014) using spherical harmonics, implemented in SCALE3 ABSPACK scaling algorithm. Supplementary crystallographic data have been deposited at Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre: 2,220,356. It can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif (accessed on 18 November 2022).
For the MAO inhibition studies, a Varian Cary Eclipse fluorescence spectrophotometer was employed. Microsomes from insect cells containing recombinant human MAO-A and MAO-B (5 mg protein/mL) and kynuramine dihydrobromide were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich.
Synthesis and characterization of 2,1-benzisoxazoles (3a–o, 5)
In a flat-bottom flask, a mixture of finely powdered sodium hydroxide (5 g, 0.125 mol) and isopropyl alcohol (40 mL) was stirred for 30 min. Arylacetonitrile (0.015 mol) and a p-substituted nitroarene (0.012 mol) were added sequentially to the flask. The reaction mixture was vigorously stirred at room temperature until the completion of the reaction (TLC monitoring, 8–24 h). The reaction was poured into 400 mL water and the precipitate that formed was removed by filtration and washed with water. The filtrate was treated with hydrochloric acid until the pH tested acidic, and the precipitate that formed was collected by filtration. The product was purified by recrystallization from isopropanol [22, 23].
5-Iodo-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)benzo[c]isoxazole (3a)
Orange solid, 61% (2.57 g) yield, m.p. 112–114 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.53 (s, 1H), 8.09 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.62 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 3.88 (s, 3H) [34].
3-(4-Chlorophenyl)-5-iodobenzo[c]isoxazole (3b)
Brown solid, 71% (3.1 g) yield, m.p. 185–187 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.59 (s, 1H), 8.17 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.73—7.59 (m, 3H), 7.55 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H) [24].
5-Chloro-3-(p-tolyl)benzo[c]isoxazole (3c)
Beige solid, 63% (1.86 g) yield, m.p. 136–138 °C.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.22 (s, 1H), 8.02 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.74 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 1H), 7.48—7.40 (m, 3H), 2.42 (s, 3H) [24].
3-Phenyl-5-(phenylethynyl)benzo[c]isoxazole (3d)
Yellow solid, 57% (2.02 g) yield, m.p. 143–144 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.39 (s, 1H), 8.19 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 7.76 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 7.79—7.61 (m, 5H), 7.59—6.71 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 165.0, 156.6, 134.1, 131.9, 131.5, 130.1, 129.5, 129.3, 127.5, 127.2, 125.3, 122.5, 119.3, 116.1, 114.2, 91.0, 89.8..HRMS (ESI) calcd for C21H13NO [M + Na]+ 357.9699, found 357.9696 [24].
5-Chloro-6-(5-methyl-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)-3-phenylbenzo[c]isoxazole (3e)
Beige solid, 72% (2.68 g) yield, m.p. 171–172 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.52 (s, 1H), 8.22 (d, J = 22.5 Hz, 3H), 7.71 – 7.62 (m, 3H), 2.74 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz DMSO-d6) δ 177.8, 166.7, 165.5, 155.7, 131.8, 130.2, 130.0, 127.7, 127.3, 127.1, 123.0, 120.2, 114.4, 12.4..HRMS (ESI) calcd for C16H10ClN3O2 [M + Na]+ 334.0354, found 334.0350.
3-(3-Chlorophenyl)-5-(2-methyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl)benzo[c]isoxazole (3f)
Beige solid, 58% (2.19 g) yield, m.p. 175–177 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.11—8.05 (m, 2H), 7.93 (t, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.72—7.65 (m, 2H), 7.65—7.58 (m, 1H), 7.49 (dd, J = 9.3, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 4.09—3.98 (m, 2H), 3.87–3.74 (m, 2H), 1.64 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.79, 157.59, 140.35, 131.24, 130.69, 130.19, 127.85, 126.98, 116.23, 115.78, 113.74, 108.23, 64.72, 26.90. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C17H14ClNO3 [M + Na]+ 304.0944, found 304.0950 [24].
5-Bromo-3-phenylbenzo[c]isoxazole (3g)
Yellow solid, 74% (3.04 g) yield, m.p. 116–118 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.42 (s, 1H), 8.15 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.6 Hz, 2H), 7.70—7.64 (m, 1H), 7.64—7.56 (m, 3H), 7.55 (dd, J = 9.4, 1.6 Hz, 1H) [35].
5-Iodo-3-phenylbenzo[c]isoxazole (3h)
Yellow solid, 67% (3.2 g) yield, m.p. 112–115 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.58 (s, 1H), 8.13 (dd, J = 7.7, 1.6 Hz, 2H), 7.65—7.63 (m, 1H), 7.63—7.47 (m, 3H), 7.54 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H) [35].
5-Iodo-3-(p-tolyl)benzo[c]isoxazole (3i)
Beige solid, 78% (3.12 g) yield, m.p. 109–110 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.56 (s, 1H), 8.11 – 7.98 (m, 3H), 7.64 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.42 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 163.8, 156.1, 141.6, 134.0, 139.2, 130.6, 129.9, 127.0, 125.4, 124.8, 117.2, 115.9, 21.6. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C14H10INO [M + Na]+ 357.9699, found 357.9687.
5-Chloro-3-phenylbenzo[c]isoxazole (3j)
Yellow solid, 76% (4.2 g) yield, m.p. 115–117 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.25 (s, 1H), 8.13 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 7.77 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 1H), 7.69—7.52 (m, 3H), 7.45 (dd, J = 9.5, 1.5 Hz, 1H) [36].
6-Dichloro-3-phenylbenzo[c]isoxazole (3k)
Beige solid, 64% (2.03 g) yield, m.p. 157–159 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.55 (s, 1H), 8.20 (s, 1H), 8.16 (dd, J = 7.4, 2.1 Hz, 2H), 7.71—7.58 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 165.4, 156.3, 135.4, 131.8, 130.1, 128.5, 127.3, 127.0, 122.8, 116.7, 113.1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C13H7Cl2NO [M + Na]+ 285.9797, found 285.9799 [24].
5-(1,3-Dioxolan-2-yl)-3-phenylbenzo[c]isoxazole (3l)
Beige solid, 62% (1.98 g) yield, m.p. 137–138 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.17—8.08 (m, 3H), 7.75—7.63 (m, 3H), 7.63 – 7.56 (m, 1H), 7.46 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H), 5.82 (s, 1H), 4.20—4.04 (m, 2H), 4.04—3.93 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 165.1, 158.0, 135.5, 131.4, 130.5, 130.1, 127.7, 127.0, 120.1, 115.9, 113.6, 103.1, 65.6..HRMS (ESI) calcd for C16H13NO3 [M + Na]+ 304.0944, found 304.0950 [37].
3-(4-Bromophenyl)-5-chlorobenzo[c]isoxazole (3m)
Beige solid, 76% (1.40 g) yield, m.p. 230–232 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.24 (s, 1H), 8.06 (t, J = 19.0 Hz, 2H), 7.98—7.59 (m, 3H), 7.46 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H) [34].
5-Chloro-3-(4-chlorophenyl)benzo[c]isoxazole (3n)
White solid, 73% (1.26 g) yield, m.p. 229–232 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.23 (s, 1H), 8.19—8.07 (m, 2H), 7.77 (dd, J = 12.6, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 7.76—7.57 (m, 2H), 7.49—7.40 (m, 1H).13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 163.4, 156.4, 136.2, 133.2, 130.4, 130.1, 128.7, 126.3, 119.7, 117.7, 114.6..HRMS (ESI) calcd for C13H7Cl2NO [M + Na]+ 285.9803, found 285.9798 [24].
5-Chloro-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)benzo[c]isoxazole (3o)
Yellow solid, 68% (2.06 g) yield, m.p. 174 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.91 (s, 1H), 7.82 (d, J = 29.8 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 1H), 7.32—7.14 (m, 3H), 7.03 (t, J = 19.9 Hz, 1H), 4.15—3.66 (m, 2H) [22].
5,5'-Oxybis(3-phenylbenzo[c]isoxazole) (5)
White solid, 63% (3.05 g) yield, m.p. 190–192 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.02 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 4H), 7.81 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 2H), 7.56 (dd, J = 16.8, 9.6 Hz, 7H), 7.41 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 2H), 7.41 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H) [38].
Synthesis and characterization of 2,1-benzisoxazoles (7a–c)
In a flat-bottom flask, a mixture of finely powdered sodium hydroxide (5 g, 0.125 mol) and isopropyl alcohol (40 mL) was stirred for 30 min. 1-(4-Cyanobenzyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazole (0.015 mol) and a p-substituted nitroarene (0.012 mol) were added sequentially to the flask. The reaction mixture was vigorously stirred at room temperature until the completion of the reaction (TLC monitoring, 20 h). The reaction was poured into 400 mL water and the precipitate that formed was removed by filtration and washed with water. The filtrate was treated with hydrochloric acid until the pH tested acidic, and the precipitate that formed was collected by filtration. The product was purified by recrystallization from isopropanol, and then from N,N-dimethylformamide.
4-(5,7-Dichlorobenzo[c]isoxazol-3-yl)benzonitrile (7a)
Light yellow solid, 53% (0.77 g) yield, m.p. 240–241 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.33 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 3H), 8.07 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.81 (d, J = 17.6 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.4, 154.9, 133.9, 132.3, 130.6, 127.9, 121.9, 119.3, 118.7, 116.3, 113.8. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C14H6Cl2N2O [M + Na]+ 310.9749, found 310.9740.
4-(5-Chlorobenzo[c]isoxazol-3-yl)benzonitrile (7b)
Yellow solid, 67% (2.05 g) yield, m.p. 236–237 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.33 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 3H), 8.07 (s, 2H), 7.82 (s, 1H), 7.49 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 162.4, 156.4, 133.9, 133.5, 131.3, 131.0, 127.7, 119.8, 118.8, 118.0, 115.6, 113.3. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C14H7ClN2O [M + Na]+ 277.0139, found 277.0133.
4-(5-Chloro-6-(5-methyl-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)benzo[c]isoxazol-3-yl)benzonitrile (7c)
Yellow solid, 65% (2.62 g) yield, m.p. 257–258 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.58 (s, 1H), 8.38 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 8.30 (s, 1H), 8.09 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.3, 155.0, 133.9, 132.3, 130.6, 127.9, 121.9, 119.3, 118.7, 116.3, 113.8. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C17H9ClN4O2 [M + Na]+ 359.0306, found 359.0301.
MAO inhibition—determination of IC50 values
IC50 values for the inhibition of MAO were measured as described previously [28]. Microsomes from insect cells containing recombinant human MAO-A and MAO-B (5 mg protein/mL) served as enzyme sources (Sigma-Aldrich) while kynuramine was used as non-specific MAO substrate. The enzyme reactions (200 µL reactions prepared in 96-well microtiter plates) contained phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 7.4), 50 µM kynuramine and the test inhibitors at concentrations of 0.003–100 µM. Stock solutions of the test inhibitors were dissolved in DMSO and added to the enzyme reactions to give a final DMSO concentration of 4% (v/v). The reactions were initiated with addition of MAO-A (0.0075 mg protein/mL) or MAO-B (0.015 mg protein/mL) and after 20 min of incubation at 37 °C, the reactions were terminated by the addition of 80 µL NaOH (2 N). The concentration of 4-hydroxyquinoline, the product of kynuramine oxidation by MAO, was measured by fluorescence spectrophotometry (λex = 310 nm; λem = 400 nm). IC50 values were estimated from sigmoidal plots of enzyme catalytic rate versus the inhibitor concentration (log[I]) which were constructed with the Prism software package (GraphPad). IC50 values were estimated in triplicate determinations from these plots and are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Global (shared) fitting of the kinetic data yielded the following Km and Vmax values for kynuramine: Km = 49.8 ± 3.07 and 32.4 ± 3.73 µM for MAO-A and MAO-B, respectively; Vmax = 34.0 ± 0.80 and 8.39 ± 0.28 nmol/min.mg protein, for MAO-A and MAO-B, respectively.
MAO inhibition—Lineweaver–Burk plots
For each of the selected test inhibitors, a set of six Lineweaver–Burk plots were constructed using the following inhibitor concentrations: 0 × IC50, ¼ × IC50, ½ × IC50, ¾ × IC50, 1 × IC50 and 1¼ × IC50. For each line, the concentration of kynuramine ranged from 15–250 µM. The reactions were carried out as described above for the IC50 value determinations with the exception that the final MAO concentrations in the reactions were 0.015 mg protein/mL for both MAO-A and MAO-B. Linear regression was carried out with the Prism software package.
Molecular docking
Molecular docking was carried out with the Discovery Studio 3.1 software package as described previously [28]. The X-ray crystal structures of MAO-A (PDB code: 2Z5X) and MAO-B (PDB code: 3PO7) with harmine and zonisamide, respectively, bound to the active sites were selected as protein models [19, 29]. Illustrations were prepared with the PyMOL molecular graphics system [39].
References
Bortolato M, Chen K, Shih JC (2008) Monoamine oxidase inactivation: from pathophysiology to therapeutics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60(13–14):1527–1533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2008.06.002
Youdim MB, Bakhle YS (2006) Monoamine oxidase: isoforms and inhibitors in Parkinson’s disease and depressive illness. Br J Pharmacol 147(Suppl 1):S287-296. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0706464
Shih JC, Chen K, Ridd MJ (1999) Monoamine oxidase: from genes to behavior. Annu Rev Neurosci 22:197–217. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.197
Shih JC (2018) Monoamine oxidase isoenzymes: genes, functions and targets for behavior and cancer therapy. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 125(11):1553–1566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-018-1927-8
Youdim MB, Edmondson D, Tipton KF (2006) The therapeutic potential of monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Nat Rev Neurosci 7(4):295–309. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1883
Henchcliffe C, Schumacher HC, Burgut FT (2005) Recent advances in Parkinson’s disease therapy: use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Expert Rev Neurother 5(6):811–821. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737175.5.6.811
Fernandez HH, Chen JJ (2007) Monoamine oxidase-B inhibition in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Pharmacotherapy 27(12):174s–185s. https://doi.org/10.1592/phco.27.12part2.174S
Mulinari S (2012) Monoamine theories of depression: historical impact on biomedical research. J Hist Neurosci 21(4):366–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964704X.2011.623917
Lum CT, Stahl SM (2012) Opportunities for reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase-A (RIMAs) in the treatment of depression. CNS Spectr 17(3):107–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1092852912000594
Meyer JH, Ginovart N, Boovariwala A, Sagrati S, Hussey D, Garcia A, Young T, Praschak-Rieder N, Wilson AA, Houle S (2006) Elevated monoamine oxidase a levels in the brain: an explanation for the monoamine imbalance of major depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 63(11):1209–1216. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.63.11.1209
Kaludercic N, Carpi A, Menabo R, Di Lisa F, Paolocci N (2011) Monoamine oxidases (MAO) in the pathogenesis of heart failure and ischemia/reperfusion injury. Biochim Biophys Acta 1813(7):1323–1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2010.09.010
Mialet-Perez J, Parini A (2020) Cardiac monoamine oxidases: at the heart of mitochondrial dysfunction. Cell Death Dis 11(1):54. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-2251-4
Wu JB, Shao C, Li X, Li Q, Hu P, Shi C, Li Y, Chen YT, Yin F, Liao CP, Stiles BL, Zhau HE, Shih JC, Chung LW (2014) Monoamine oxidase a mediates prostate tumorigenesis and cancer metastasis. J Clin Invest 124(7):2891–2908. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI70982
Gross ME, Agus DB, Dorff TB, Pinski JK, Quinn DI, Castellanos O, Gilmore P, Shih JC (2021) Phase 2 trial of monoamine oxidase inhibitor phenelzine in biochemical recurrent prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 24(1):61–68. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-020-0211-9
Guglielmi P, Carradori S, D’Agostino I, Campestre C, Petzer JP (2022) An updated patent review on monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors. Expert Opin Ther Pat 32(8):849–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/13543776.2022.2083501
Yoshimi K, Kozuka M, Sakai J, Iizawa T, Shimizu Y, Kaneko I, Kojima K, Iwata N (2002) Novel monoamine oxidase inhibitors, 3-(2-aminoethoxy)-1,2-benzisoxazole derivatives, and their differential reversibility. Jpn J Pharmacol 88(2):174–182. https://doi.org/10.1254/jjp.88.174
Sonsalla PK, Wong LY, Winnik B, Buckley B (2010) The antiepileptic drug zonisamide inhibits MAO-B and attenuates MPTP toxicity in mice: clinical relevance. Exp Neurol 221(2):329–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.11.018
Petzer JP, Petzer A (2016) Leflunomide, a reversible monoamine oxidase inhibitor. Cent Nerv Syst Agents Med Chem 16(2):112–119. https://doi.org/10.2174/1871524915666150824154329
Binda C, Aldeco M, Mattevi A, Edmondson DE (2011) Interactions of monoamine oxidases with the antiepileptic drug zonisamide: specificity of inhibition and structure of the human monoamine oxidase B complex. J Med Chem 54(3):909–912. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm101359c
Binda C, Wang J, Pisani L, Caccia C, Carotti A, Salvati P, Edmondson DE, Mattevi A (2007) Structures of human monoamine oxidase B complexes with selective noncovalent inhibitors: Safinamide and coumarin analogs. J Med Chem 50(23):5848–5852. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm070677y
Binda C, Li M, Hubalek F, Restelli N, Edmondson DE, Mattevi A (2003) Insights into the mode of inhibition of human mitochondrial monoamine oxidase B from high-resolution crystal structures. P Natl Acad Sci USA 100(17):9750–9755. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1633804100
Davis RB, Pizzini LC, Benigni JD (1960) The condensation of aromatic nitro compounds with arylacetonitriles I Nitrobenzene. J Am Chem Soc 82(11):2913–2915. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01496a058
Wieclaw M, Bobin M, Kwast A, Bujok R, Wrobel Z, Wojciechowski K (2015) General synthesis of 2,1-benzisoxazoles (anthranils) from nitroarenes and benzylic C-H acids in aprotic media promoted by combination of strong bases and silylating agents. Mol Divers 19(4):807–816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-015-9627-x
Orlov VY, Kotov AD, Orlova TN, Ganzha VV (2005) Investigation of the Structure of 5-R-3-Aryl-2,1-benzisoxazoles (Anthranils) Using 1H NMR spectroscopy. Chem Heterocycl Compd 41(5):630–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10593-005-0194-4
Wood PM, Woo LW, Humphreys A, Chander SK, Purohit A, Reed MJ, Potter BV (2005) A letrozole-based dual aromatase-sulphatase inhibitor with in vivo activity. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 94(1–3):123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2004.12.028
Gao S, Fan RQ, Wang XM, Qiang LS, Wei LG, Wang P, Zhang HJ, Yang YL, Wang YL (2015) An insight into the controllable synthesis of Cd(II) complexes with a new multifunctional ligand and its application in dye-sensitized solar cells and luminescence properties. J Mater Chem A 3(11):6053–6063. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA06671E
Weissbach H, Smith TE, Daly JW, Witkop B, Udenfriend S (1960) A rapid spectrophotometric assay of mono-amine oxidase based on the rate of disappearance of kynuramine. J Biol Chem 235:1160–1163
Mostert S, Petzer A, Petzer JP (2015) Indanones as high-potency reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase. ChemMedChem 10(5):862–873. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201500059
Son SY, Ma J, Kondou Y, Yoshimura M, Yamashita E, Tsukihara T (2008) Structure of human monoamine oxidase A at 2.2-A resolution: the control of opening the entry for substrates/inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(15):5739–5744. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710626105
Daina A, Michielin O, Zoete V (2017) SwissADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci Rep 7(1):42717. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42717
Sheldrick GM (2015) SHELXT - integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv 71(Pt 1):3–8. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053273314026370
Sheldrick GM (2015) Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem 71(Pt 1):3–8. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229614024218
Dolomanov OV, Bourhis LJ, Gildea RJ, Howard JAK, Puschmann H (2009) OLEX2: a complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J Appl Crystallogr 42:339–341. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889808042726
Li J, Wang ZB, Xu Y, Lu XC, Zhu SR, Liu L (2019) Catalyst-free cyclization of anthranils and cyclic amines: one-step synthesis of rutaecarpine. Chem Commun 55(80):12072–12075. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cc06160f
Odinokov AV, Plekhovich SD, Budruev AV (2019) Synthesis of 3-phenylbenzo[c]isoxazoles by thermocyclization of 2-azidobenzophenones. Russ Chem Bull 68(6):1298–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11172-019-2557-5
Stokes BJ, Vogel CV, Urnezis LK, Pan M, Driver TG (2010) Intramolecular Fe(II)-catalyzed N-O or N-N bond formation from aryl azides. Org Lett 12(12):2884–2887. https://doi.org/10.1021/ol101040p
Orlov VY, Kotov AD, Tsivov AV, Rusakov AI (2015) Mechanism of formation of 2,1-benzisoxazoles in reactions of nitroarenes with arylacetonitriles. Russ J Org Chem 51(2):245–252. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070428015020190
Norris SO, Stille JK (1976) Synthesis and solution properties of phenylated polyquinolines utilization of the Friedländer Reaction for the synthesis of aromatic polymers containing 2,6-quinoline units in the main chain. Macromolecules 9(3):496–505. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma60051a021
DeLano WL (2002) The PyMOL molecular graphics system. DeLano Scientific, San Carlos
Funding
Open access funding provided by North-West University. This study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project 22–13-20085; synthesis of 2,1-benzisoxazoles) and the National Research Foundation of South Africa [grant specific unique reference numbers (UID) 137997 (JP) and 132168 (AP); MAO inhibition studies]. The Grantholders acknowledge that opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in any publication generated by the NRF supported research are that of the authors, and that the NRF accepts no liability whatsoever in this regard.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Conceptualization of the study was done by Anton Shetnev and Mikhail Korsakov while the original draft of the manuscript was written by Anton Shetnev and Jacobus P. Petzer. Alexandr Kotov, Anna Kunichkina, Irina Proskurina and Sergey Baykov performed the syntheses and identification of compounds. The enzymology and related data analyses were performed by Anél Petzer and the molecular modeling by Jacobus P. Petzer.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 (PDF 1805 KB)
1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra for the synthesised compounds and crystallographic data for 3c.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Shetnev, A., Kotov, A., Kunichkina, A. et al. Monoamine oxidase inhibition properties of 2,1-benzisoxazole derivatives. Mol Divers 28, 1009–1021 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-023-10628-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-023-10628-4