Abstract
In the past few decades, due to the rapid development of industry and the rapid growth of population, emissions of pollutants to the environment have increased dramatically, and the demand for drinking water is also increasing. Water treatment is a matter of concern because it is directly related to the health of humans and wildlife. Graphene and its derivatives have potential applications in seawater desalination and wastewater treatment due to their unique pore structure and ionic molecular sieving separation capabilities. Graphene, graphene oxide (GO), and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) can be formulated into nanoporous materials and composites with tunable properties that can be optimized for water filtration. Methods for perforating graphene include ion etching/ion bombardment and electron beam nanometer engraving, which are briefly introduced in this paper. Graphene-based composites further expand the capabilities of graphene in seawater desalination and wastewater treatment, by introducing new features and properties. In this review, the performance improvement of graphene-based separation membranes in decontamination and desalination in recent years is reviewed in detail. This review focuses on improving the performance of graphene-based membranes for separation, decontamination, and seawater desalination applications, by discussing how various modifications and preparation methods impact important performance properties, including water permeance, selectivity, rejection of solutes, membrane mechanical strength, and antifouling characteristics. We also discuss the outlook for future development of graphene-based membranes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Two-dimensional (2D) materials with excellent chemical stability, advantageous dimensional selection characteristics and high aspect ratio are often used in the manufacture of filtration membranes. [1] Graphene is a two-dimensional material with carbon atoms in the sp2 hybridization, which has extremely high thermal conductivity and stiffness, and is able to reconcile the contradictory properties of brittleness and ductility. [2, 3] Graphene oxide (GO) is an oxidized derivative of graphene, which maintains the unique two-dimensional structure, and is rich in oxygen-containing functional groups, such as hydroxyl, epoxy, and carboxyl groups. [4] GO has chemical stability and convenient size control characteristics [5], high mechanical strength, and chemical adaptability. [6, 7] GO has been widely used as a material for membrane manufacture. [8] GO-containing membranes have been proposed for a wide range applications, such as water desalination [9,10,11,12,13,14], dye removal [15,16,17,18,19], oil–water separation [20,21,22], gas separations [23,24,25,26,27], luminescence [28], and electrochemical applications [29,30,31]. Graphene materials can perform as molecular sieves if pore sizes can be controlled through perforation or through preparing intercalated layers and composite membranes. [5]
High-performance membranes for water purification should achieve high flux, high rejection, high stability in aqueous media, mechanical strength, and high fouling resistance. GO membranes have desirable ion selectivity, but suffer from poor structural stability and low flux. [32] Their stability can be improved through strong interactions, such as chemical cross-linking, but these modifications greatly affect the water permeability of dense GO membranes. On the other hand, GO membranes with weak and stable interactions (hydrophobic or π–π interactions) may not be strong enough to withstand actual water filtration operation. [11] Therefore, combining GO with nanoparticles and polymer carriers to prepare GO-based composite membranes is an attractive approach. [33,34,35] In fact, these strategies can improve the water flux while also improving mechanical strength and preserving the screening performance of the GO membrane. [36,37,38]
In our previous reviews [39,40,41,42], we summarized the status of GO-based composite membranes and the manufacture and application of graphene-based materials in membrane science. We also provided a summary of the theory and simulation of restricted substance transport. As sketched in Fig. 1, a single layer of perfect graphene can be used to form GO and porous graphene composites by a variety of strategies. [43] Methods for perforating graphene include ion etching/ion bombardment and electron beam nanometer engraving, which are briefly introduced in this paper. Graphene-based composites further expand the capabilities of graphene in seawater desalination and wastewater treatment, by introducing new features and properties. Graphene-based composites contain metal–organic frameworks (MOF), nanotubes and other nanomaterials intercalated into layers of graphene oxide (GO) and can achieve the effect of sieving molecules of different sizes by regulating the layer spacing of GO. Composites with polymers can improve the membrane strength and desalination performance. The performance of GO-based membranes can be improved by adjusting the membrane spacing and membrane surface functional groups. This article reviews the performance improvement of GO-based composite membranes for desalination and decontamination applications. The most important forms of GO-based membranes include composites of GO with nanoparticles and polymers.
Improved strategies for preparation of graphene separation membranes
Graphene-based materials include both nanoporous graphene and membranes in which GO and various materials are compounded with each other. [44] Based on the resulting microstructure, graphene-based membranes can be broadly classified into three types, as shown in Fig. 2.
The preparation technology of graphene is relatively mature, with low cost and high yield, so that graphene can be widely used. There are many ways to prepare graphene, such as liquid-phase exfoliation [45], mechanical exfoliation [46], epitaxial growth [47], chemical vapor deposition, and decomposition of carbon nanotubes to obtain two-dimensional graphene sheets. [48] [49] In recent years, the most commonly used method for preparing large-area high-quality graphene is chemical vapor deposition (CVD). CVD uses hydrocarbon gas as the main carbon source to grow graphene on a metal substrate. Different reaction pressures and temperatures are selected according to the different properties of the carbon source to prepare large-area high-quality graphene. [50, 51]
The sp2 electronic structure of graphene provides a high electron density and enables graphene to strongly repel both water molecules and many other molecules in the gas phase. [52] Therefore, there are basically only three methods to achieve molecular sieving for graphene-based membranes as shown in Fig. 2. For type I, the graphene sheet is perforated to form nanopores, and the sieving of different molecules can be achieved by controlling the pore size. For type II, graphene sheets are stacked or laminated. For type III, the graphene serves as a composite filler combined with other matrix materials. The filtration mechanism of the latter two methods is the same, both of which achieve the sieving of different molecules by changing the interlayer distance of the graphene-based membrane. Because GO contains more oxidized groups, is more hydrophilic, and has improved chemical properties, GO is also commonly used to form the type II and type III composite materials. [53]
Porous graphene membranes
By controlling the introduction of defects into graphene through physical and chemical methods, uniform nanoscale pores can be formed on the surface of the graphene membrane, resulting in excellent selectivity in gas mixture separation, seawater desalination, and other applications. In addition, porous graphene, with its ultra-thin membrane thickness and unique pore structure, obtains a very high permeability compared to other materials. The pore size is a critical design parameter for desalination applications. As shown in Fig. 3a, a suitable pore size can exclude ions, allowing only water to pass through. [54] In recent years, several methods of introducing nanopores into graphene have been studied and reported.
Ion etching/ Ion bombardment
For practical applications permeability and selectivity must be imparted by introducing many pores at sufficient density acting in parallel over macroscopic areas of graphene. To form porous membranes by ion etching or ion bombardment, graphene first undergoes ion bombardment to form defects and is then oxidized and etched. The etching reagents preferentially corrode the defects, so as to achieve controllable pore size. [55] Figure 3b shows the simple process of preparing nanopores. Kemal et al. [57] developed an effective method of drilling quickly without etching through physical methods. As shown in Fig. 4, the researchers first overlap the two graphene layers by a special method and then drill using a focused ion beam. This method is fast and accurate and also prevents the formation of cracks.
Block copolymer lithography
Bai et al. [56] used block copolymer photolithography to prepare graphene nanomeshes with high-density nanohole arrays, which can withstand large currents and have improved electronic properties. Figure 3c shows the preparation process of the nanomesh. The initial preparation of graphene sheets is similar to CVD. The graphene sheets are then placed in a template, and holes are etched by oxygen ions. It is worth noting that in this method, the size of the graphene network only depends on the size of the graphene nanosheets, and theoretically, a large amount of porous graphene can be prepared.
Electron Beam Nanosculpting
Electron beam nanoengraving can also be used to prepare nanoholes. In this method, a suspended multilayer graphene sheet is nanoengraved by a focused electron beam in a transmission electron microscope (TEM), which can prepare nanoholes in a short time. [58] Figure 3d is a TEM image of a nanohole engraved by an electron beam, with a diameter of about 8 nm and a thickness of about 2 nm. Conductivity measurements on membranes prepared with electron beam methods demonstrate that ions can pass through the pores of graphene. [59]
Assembled graphene or GO laminates
A more common method than perforation is to use stacked GO nanosheets to form membranes. In this method, the interlayer spacing between the sheets is controlled to achieve molecular sieving. The thickness of the graphene nanoflake itself is only on the order of a single atom, but the tile size is as high as tens of microns. When the graphene is oxidized to GO, its original sp2 structure is destroyed. This causes the GO layers to adopt wrinkles, making them easier to stack with increased layer spacing, [4, 60], resulting in the type II membrane shown in Fig. 2. When the GO membrane is used for water treatment, this layer spacing plays a role in sieving molecules. Furthermore, the charge on the GO can repel charged dyes and other pollutants. [61]
Vacuum-assisted filtration
The vacuum filtration method, shown in Fig. 5a, is the most widely used method for preparing graphene-based membranes. In this method, a solution of graphene nanosheets is forced through a microfiltration support membrane using a filter suction apparatus under vacuum. [62] The vacuum suction method produces a thin membrane with a layered structure of ordered lamella, with a very high degree of orientation. The π–π interactions between graphene sheets provide mechanical stability to the resulting membrane. When GO is used, the resulting membrane contains a very high density of oxygen-functional groups. The vacuum suction method is very simple to perform and can produce membranes ranging in thickness from transparent membranes only a few nanometers thick to membranes that are tens of microns thick.
Layer-by-layer assembly
Layer assembly methods include the layer-by-layer (LbL) self-assembly and Langmuir–Blodgett (LB) self-assembly methods. High-quality and large-area graphene sheets can be assembled by both LbL and LB methods. In the LbL method, layers are deposited sequentially and are stabilized by hydrogen bond, electrostatic, dipole–dipole, or covalent bond interactions. Because the surface of GO is rich in negatively charged functional groups, LbL assembly using GO can be achieved by combining GO with cationic small molecules and with cationic polymers. GO membranes prepared by the LbL method have high toughness and elastic modulus. Different microstructures of the resulting GO sheets are obtained depending upon the forces used to stabilize the LbL assembly (Fig. 5b). [63] LB technology has also been proposed for the production of GO sheets and results in membranes that contain fewer wrinkles [64, 65].
Continuous centrifugal casting (CCC)
Continuous centrifugal casting (CCC) is an efficient method for preparing GO nanosheets. Zhong et al. prepared dense GO membranes in a short time through CCC. The membranes produced have a thickness on the order of 10 μm, which is generally thicker than the membranes produced by other methods. Figure 5a depicts the CCC process for preparation of GO nanosheets. The centrifugal force and shear force generated during the rotation process are transferred into the GO dispersion, so that the GO membrane is compressed both in the radial direction and the tangential direction, thereby obtaining a smooth and dense GO membrane (Fig. 5d, e). [66]
The methods described above may all be classified as lamination methods, as they are various approaches for generating laminated graphene or GO structures. These methods have shortcomings with respect to their ability to provide control of the pore structure and surface chemistry. GO membranes formed by lamination methods are susceptible to disintegration in contact with aqueous environments, due to poor bonding between GO sheets within the membrane. Several methods described below have been developed to further enhance the stability, improve the mechanical properties, and/or provide greater control of the pore size.
Weak reduction
Weak reduction methods change the surface chemistry of GO, by reducing the oxygen-containing functional groups, to form rGO. This moderates the hydrophilicity of the membrane. Weak reduction also inhibits the dissociation of the membrane in solution and thereby increases membrane stability. However, reduction can also damage the membrane, so appropriate reductants must be carefully chosen. [67] Proper weak reduction treatment can not only increase the number of sp2 regions in GO and thus improve the water flux of the membrane, but also effectively improve the structural stability of the membrane upon exposure to aqueous solutions.
Cross-linking methods
Cross-linking can suppress GO membrane swelling and dissociation in solution and improve structural stability. Cross-linking methods include both covalent and non-covalent methods. Covalent cross-linking can enhance the stability and sieving ability of graphene-based membranes, while non-covalent cross-linking generally helps the dispersion of graphene-based materials [68,69,70]. Non-covalent cross-linking can maintain the inherent properties of graphene-based materials, and the modification of graphene-based materials is mainly achieved through the interaction of anion and cation, hydrogen bonds, surfactants, and stacking interactions [68]. Covalent methods include the use of UV activation chemistry, small molecule cross-linking agents and thermally induced reactions, etc. [71]. Covalent cross-linking can cause defects in graphene, reduce the inherent properties of graphene-based materials [72], and bring many different properties to graphene-based films. For example, the hydrophobicity of the graphene-based film can be greatly enhanced by the amidation reaction of the coupling agent [73], and the graphene-based material functionalized by amine and carboxyl groups is covalently attached to the polymer matrix containing anhydride; the film is realized Super hydrophilic. [74] Or the conjugated structure modification of graphene itself realizes the preparation of amphiphilic materials. The coordination of divalent metal ions with oxygen-containing functional groups in GO can greatly improve the mechanical properties of the membrane [75]. And, Cross-linking using small molecules can reduce the internal concentration polarization that occurs during forward osmosis and can greatly improve the flexibility of the membrane synthesis process. [76] Thermal annealing can induce cross-polymerization of acetylene groups. [77] When heated, the ethynyl group has an exothermic transformation, and the isoimide in the ethynyl group is rearranged into imide. The mechanism of cross-linking reaction is very complex, most of the acetylene dimer becomes enyne structure, and a small part trimerizes to form benzene ring. [78, 79] Typically, cross-linking increases the solvent stability, but has no effect on gas separation performance [80].
Large molecule intercalation
Since GO nanosheets have very high specific surface area, the electrostatic repulsion between layers can generate strong destabilizing forces within GO membranes. The addition of large molecules that intercalate between layers can effectively reduce the electrostatic repulsion within the GO membrane, thereby stabilizing the structure. Large molecule intercalation can also be used to modify membrane performance by controlling interlayer spacing to enhance molecular separation [81].
Graphene-based and GO-based composites
The combination of GO with nanoparticles to form composite membranes can achieve both excellent permeability and selectivity. The oxygen-containing functional groups in GO can be used to bind nanomaterials between layers of GO through coordination forces, forming submicron GO composites with excellent mechanical stability and precise molecular sieve properties [82]. Polymers can also be used to adjust layer spacing in GO membranes. GO/polymer membranes have been proposed for use in seawater desalination and wastewater treatment and may contribute to alleviating water shortages and environmental problems. GO/polymer composite membranes are often impermeable to water in the dry state, making them also suitable for gas sieving applications [83].
Significant advances in next-generation separation membranes based on graphene and GO take advantage of a number of novel transport properties of these materials. [84, 85] GO fragments are stacked layer-by-layer to form a compact stacked structure. Although there are gaps between the layers, these are not sufficient to achieve selectivity in separations. However, by rebuilding two-dimensional nanochannels between graphene sheets, the separation ability can be effectively improved, to enable sieving of molecules of specific sizes. [86, 87] Graphene-based membranes, including GO, rGO, and doped graphene, have also been used for catalytic degradation of harmful pollutants and dyes. [88,89,90,91]
Table 1 summarizes the modification methods of some graphene-based membranes and their properties after modification. Composite membranes from graphene and its derivatives have led to new applications in water purification and desalination. Although most graphene-based water membrane technologies are still in the development stage, they have promising prospects for the future. In particular, the GO-based membranes are expected to have greater direct market potential due to their relatively low cost and the ease with which they can be implemented in existing membrane-based operations. The combination of GO with macromolecules, such as polymers, makes the GO membrane more ductile while increasing water flux. The combination with nanoparticles, such as nanotubes, TiO2 nanoparticles, and MOF, can also improve the water flux, desalination rate and decontamination capabilities of GO-based membranes.[92,93,94,95]
Improved performance of graphene-based membranes in decontamination applications
Compared with the pure GO water purification membranes with fixed layer spacing, composite membranes formed by combining GO with various materials have important enhancements in properties and performance. Performance enhancements are achieved by changing the GO membrane layer spacing, the membrane surface charge, and the chemistry of the oxygen-containing groups on the membrane. Decontamination performance is often demonstrated by the removal a model dye compound from water. Commonly used cationic dyes include methylene blue (MB) and rhodamine B (RB); anionic dyes include methyl orange (MO), rhodamine WT (R-WT).
Nanomaterial intercalation to modify GO membranes
The nanomaterials used for intercalation can be divided into three categories, based on their dimensionality. Zero-dimensional nanoparticles include MOFs [107] and carbon quantum dots [108], one-dimensional nanoparticles include carbon nanotubes [109], and two-dimensional nanomaterials include WS2 nanosheets [110].
Nanoparticles
Liangliang Dong et al. [111] introduced NH2-Fe3O4 through the vacuum filtration strategy to prepare high water flux GO/NH2-Fe3O4 nanofiltration membranes (Fig. 6a). Addition of the NH2-Fe3O4 nanoparticles increases the GO layer spacing significantly, thus sacrificing ion sieving performance, but at the same time, the water flux and dye rejection increase (Fig. 6b). The NH2-Fe3O4 also acts as a cross-linking agent to stabilize the composite membrane. Therefore, GO/NH2-Fe3O4 composite membranes may be used in the treatment of dye/salt mixed wastewater.
Nanoporous MOFs have attracted increased attention in the field of decontamination and desalination due to their special porous structures. [112] Guanet et al. [94] produced rGO, which increases the stability, and reduces the interlayer spacing and water flux, compared to GO. They then formed rGO composite membranes containing nanoporous crystals of UIO-66 and Prussian blue (PB). The prepared composite membranes have increased interlayer spacing, and screening performance. The pore size of UIO-66 is between 0.6 and 1.1 nm, the pore size of PB is around 0.4 nm, and the average diameter of water is 0.32 nm. The composite containing the porous MOF nanoparticles has greatly increased the water flux. Figure 7a-c illustrates the transmission path of water in the composite membrane. Two screenings, provided by both the rGO layer spacing and the intercalating MOF, also greatly increase the rejection of the a model dye compound. As shown in Fig. 7d, as the content of UIO-66 increases the rejection remains above 90%. Increasing the nanoparticle content will not continuously increase the interlayer spacing of rGO, but will result in more densely packed nanoparticles. Thus, the increase in water flux is also due in part to the better water permeability of porous MOF materials. [94]
Other MOFs have been used as intercalation materials to control the interlayer spacing of GO membranes. Calculations have predicted good compatibility between GO and ZIF-8. [114] As a porous nanomaterial, ZIF-8 also has the advantages of high specific surface area and large functional pore size. MOF grown on the GO membrane can effectively improve the weak compatibility between the nanoparticles and the polymer and prevent the aggregation of MOF on the polymer. [106, 113] Figure 7e is a schematic diagram of ZIF-8 growing on GO.
In addition to porous nanomaterials, other nanoparticles can also be used as intercalation materials to compound with GO. Zhao et al. [108] prepared GO composite membranes containing GO quantum dots (GO QDs). Compounding with GO QDs improves the hydrophilicity and water flux without affecting the rejection of pollutants. Figure 8a illustrates the preparation of the composite membrane, which is prepared into a membrane by a the vacuum filtration method. When the content of GO QDs increases, the interlayer spacing also increases, and the quantum dots scattered on the outer surface of the membrane can improve the membrane hydrophilicity, thereby improving the water flux. The left picture in Fig. 8b shows the test of the composite film on MO, and the right picture shows the test on DY. It can be clearly seen that as the content of GO QDs increases, the water permeability increases steadily and the rejection rate can be well maintained. Similarly, Peng et al. [115] used a simple deposition method to compound rGO with SiO2 (Fig. 8c) which improved the water permeability of GO base film and retained the high rejection rate. In order to solve the problem of the stability of GO base membrane, the author also introduced PDA, which not only made the composite membrane strong, but also improved its hydrophilicity. And, as shown in Fig. 8d, as the ratio of GO to SiO2 increases, the water permeability greatly increases and the MB rejection rate is not significantly affected.
Nanotubes
Two-dimensional carbon nanotubes have good compatibility with GO and precise diameter. Han et al. [116] combined rGO with multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) on a porous substrate to obtain a composite membrane. The addition of the nanotubes doubles water permeability while maintaining the dye rejection above 95%. Figure 9 shows a schematic diagram of the GO-MWNTs composite membrane. MWNTs widen the interlayer spacing and increase the membrane roughness. The resulting membrane is hydrophilic, with improved resistance to fouling. The improved antifouling performance greatly increases the value of the composite membrane. After discovering the antifouling property of the composite of GO-MWNT, Yuan et al. [117] modified PVDF membranes by a facile phase inversion method. The composite PVDF/MWCNT/GO mixed matrix membrane not only exhibited increased the water flux, but also permitted electrical conductivity measurements for real-time monitoring of the degree of membrane pollution. While these modifications reduced the mechanical strength of the original PVDF membrane, these new membranes still have good application potential.
In addition to carbon nanotubes, other nanotubes can also be used to compound with GO. Zhan et al. [118] embedded halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) in GO to obtain a high-throughput, high-rejection antifouling composite membrane, for oil–water separation. HNTs are low-cost and environmentally friendly nanomaterials. [119] HNTs increase the layer spacing of the GO membrane, reduce the roughness, and significantly improve the antifouling performance. In the same year, Liu et al. [120] also published an article on HNT modified GO. As shown in Fig. 10, the rGO/HNTs composite membrane is vacuum filtered to a support membrane with the help of polydopamine, and the performance in oil–water separation is improved.
After GO is compounded with nanotubes, the general antifouling performance has been improved. This may be because commonly used nanotubes MWCNT and HNT have many hydrophilic groups that improve the membrane hydrophilicity. In addition, reports mention that the insertion of nanotubes can reduce the surface roughness of the membrane. It is generally believed that lower roughness imparts improved antifouling performance.
Nanosheets
2D nanomaterials have large specific surface area, stability after membrane formation, and both edge-to-edge and face-to-face interactions. These properties make 2D nanomaterials ideal for preparing various functional membranes. Incorporation of 2D nanosheets into graphene-based membranes can achieve property and performance enhancements. Misato et al. [121] mixed niobate nanosheets (NbNs) and GO to prepare NbN-GO composite membranes by vacuum filtration. As can be seen from Fig. 11a, based on the tight channel structure of NbN, the loose accumulation of voids after mixing with a small amount of GO forms a larger nanochannel, resulting in high porosity and high water permeability of the membrane structure of NbN-GO. When the mass ratio of NbN to GO is 55:45, the composite achieves a higher water flux and particle retention, with no effect on the rejection of a model dye (Fig. 11b). Chen et al. [110] also reported that transition metal dihalide, (TMDs) WS2 was compounded with GO, and a hybrid membrane with high flux and high rejection was prepared by simple vacuum filtration (Fig. 12a). The unmodified GO membrane is easy to swell, but has good retention function, while WS2 has the advantages of good stability, and high flux, but poor retention performance. When GO is compounded with WS2, the performance is best when the mass fraction of GO is 15%, and the rejection of dye is more than doubled.
The GO and nanosheet composite membranes mentioned above are all prepared with GO as the filler. Ma et al. [122] used MoS2 as the filler to compound with GO. As shown in Fig. 12b, a stable GO/MoS2 composite membrane was prepared. MoS2 is hydrophobic and can promote strong van der Waals interactions between MoS2 and GO, so the stability of the composite membrane in water increases. Moreover, the expansion of the interlayer spacing by MoS2 still increases the flux of the composite membrane.
Other methods to modify GO membranes
The performance of GO-based membranes can be improved by adjusting the properties via alternative preparation techniques. Potential improvement strategies include designing the spacing between GO layers by incorporating cross-linking agents of different sizes and modifying membrane charges by functionalizing GO. As shown in Fig. 13, 1, 3, 5-benzenetricarbonyl trichloride (TMC)-cross-linked GO has improved water flux and dye rejection. Furthermore, cross-linking greatly improves the stability of GO membrane. [61] In this work, the authors also considered the adsorption performance of GO when testing dye rejection. Before collecting the trapped dye, the experimental samples were equilibrated for two hours to completely eliminate the influence of adsorption.
Swelling of GO membranes in water is a persistent problem, as it increases the layer spacing, thereby reducing retention performance. [123, 124] Jingqiu Sun et al. [125] reduced the oxygen-containing functional groups of GO to form rGO and then subsequently modified the surfaces with additional GO, to obtain a layered structure of O-rGO membranes (Fig. 14a). These layered membranes have improved hydrophilicity and water permeability, compared to rGO membranes. Reduction of the oxygen-containing functional groups reduces the swelling, while addition of GO further alters charge density on the surface, thereby improving antifouling performance. As shown in Fig. 14b, the resulting modified O-rGO membrane has improved rejection of dye molecules with different charges.
For decontamination, the adsorption effect, the electrostatic repulsion effect, and the physical sieving effect of the nanochannels are all phenomena that can be improved. The adsorption of contaminants is most frequently ignored or not evaluated in many reports. The inherent adsorption capacity of GO may affect the retention performance of composite membranes. The intercalation of nanomaterials mainly achieves the effect of increasing flux and rejection by changing the interlayer spacing. Nanotubes can also improve the antifouling performance when used as intercalation materials. However, in most cases, the improvement of flux is accompanied by a decrease in retention, or it is difficult to greatly improve both the flux and the retention performance at the same time. Table 2 summarizes the water flux and retention of modified GO substrates after modification.
Improved performance of graphene-based membranes in seawater desalination applications
Membrane technology has become one of the important means of water purification and desalination. Desalination technology can contribute solutions to water shortages in coastal areas. [132] Membrane technology can be classified according to the pore size of membrane materials, and commonly used commercial membranes can be divided into reverse osmosis (RO), nanofiltration (NF), ultrafiltration (UF) and microfiltration (MF). The interception of various membranes for different solutes in water is shown in Fig. 15. RO can achieve 98–99.8% interception of Na+ and Cl− monovalent ions in solution. [133] The rejection of larger ions such as Ca2+, Mg2+, and other divalent ions exceeds 90% for NF membranes. So NF membranes can soften water quality, but the rejection of smaller ions such as Na+ will be reduced. [134] Table 3 summarizes the pore sizes of different types of membranes and the corresponding materials and solutes that can be screened by microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), reverse osmosis (RO), forward osmosis (FO), and nanofiltration (NF) membranes.
Surwade et al. [54] prepared nanoscale holes in a graphene layer with a thickness of one atom by an oxygen plasma etching process and showed that the size of the holes can be adjusted (Fig. 16a). Experiments demonstrated that porous graphene is capable of desalination while maintaining high permeability. They demonstrated that it is possible to precisely control the pore size of the graphene membrane to achieve selective screening of different ions (Fig. 16b).
The salt rejection of nanoporous graphene can reach 100%. [54] Most GO membranes achieve ion sieving by adjusting the layer spacing. If the advantages of nanoporous graphene and GO membranes are combined, this could lead to substantial improvements in water purification. [138]
Nanomaterial/GO composite membranes
The oxygen-containing groups on the surface of GO introduce multiple functionalities. Adjusting the oxygen-containing groups on GO can alter the performance of the membrane without addition of other materials. Yuan et al. [139] mixed glycine with GO under alkaline conditions and irreversibly bound carboxylic acids to the surface of GO films by nucleophilic substitution, and formed membranes by vacuum filtration (Fig. 17a). As shown in Fig. 17b the permeability and salt rejection of the membrane is improved by introducing a large number of carboxyl groups. The high permeability may be attributed to the increase in hydrophilicity. The introduction of a large number of carboxyl groups makes the membrane more negatively charged, resulting in a higher salt rejection rate. The rejection of divalent anions in Fig. 17b is twice that of monovalent anions, which also illustrates the enhancement of electronegativity of the carboxylated GO.
Porous reduced graphene oxide (PRGO) formed by perforating GO after reduction can solve the problem of GO aggregation while maintaining its flux and retention performance. PRGO has been used in dye removal, desalination and other fields. [95, 140] Zhu et al. [141] used poly (sodium-p-styrenesulfonate) (PSS) and modified halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) intercalated PRGO to obtain a composite membrane with significantly improved flux. Figure 18 is a schematic diagram of the composite membrane preparation and filtration simulation. After intercalation, the interlayer spacing of PRGO increases, and the removal rate of dye is over 97%. The removal rate of monovalent and divalent ions is less than 10%. The composite membranes can therefore be used for separations of dye form salt in mixed solutions.
The rigid nanosphere NH2-Fe3O4 intercalated GO mentioned above also achieves separation of mixed dye/salt solutions. [111] The nanomaterial composite GO membrane can separate molecules with a larger size than the salt ions due to the increase of the interlayer spacing. To achieve the removal of salt ions in water, composites are formed with polymers, which will be discussed below.
Polymer/GO composite membranes
Anion exchange membranes (AEM) are commonly used in desalination. [142] Li et al. [143] modified AEM with polydopamine and GO composite not only to increase the salt rejection but also to greatly increase the antifouling performance. The hydrophilicity, electronegativity, and surface roughness of the membrane are all related to the antifouling performance of the membrane. [144] The GO imparts excellent hydrophilicity, electronegativity, and screening performance to AEM, but its stability is poor. The introduction of polydopamine acts as a cross-linking agent to enhance the stability of the membrane and provide a degree of hydrophilicity. Polydopamine also provides electronegativity when pH > 4. The modified membrane has increased hydrophilicity, increased electronegativity, and reduced roughness, achieving a dual improvement in desalination performance and antifouling performance.
Karkooti et al. used the non-solvent induced phase separation (NIPS) method to prepare GO/polyethersulfone (GO/PES) composite membranes, which exploit the hydrophilicity and electronegative properties of GO, and greatly improve the membrane performance, while maintaining desalination performance and antifouling performance. [145]
GO nanocomposites are also often used to optimize polymer-based membranes. For example, Safarpour et al. [93] reported a new type of RO membrane. They interfacially polymerize and insert nano-rGO and TiO2 into the polyamide (PA) layer. Due to the uneven structure of GO, TiO2 is uniformly distributed on the surface of the GO film, and the exposed RO film is not affected by the embedded rGO/TiO2 nanocomposite material (Fig. 19a). The hydrophilicity and electronegativity introduced by the composite material greatly improve the flux and antifouling performance of the PA membrane. Figure 19b shows the flux and desalination results of the prepared new reverse osmosis membrane. The water flux and desalination performance of the membrane reach the maximum when the mass ratio of nanocomposite material is 0.02 wt%. However, only monovalent salt ions were tested in the article, and the salt solution concentration used for testing was low, so the desalination performance of the new membrane was not fully demonstrated.
Interfacial polymerization is a mature method for the preparation of NF membranes. Wang et al. [146] used the interfacial polymerization method with polyethyleneimine (PEI) as the water phase monomer and trimesoyl chloride (TMC) as the organic phase monomer to incorporate exfoliated hydrotalcite/graphene oxide (EHT/GO) hybrid nanosheets into a polyamide (PA) membrane. Both flux and desalination performance are improved (Fig. 20b). It is worth noting that EHT/GO will positively charge the membrane, which can effectively intercept Mg2+, which is important for water softening. Figure 20a is a diagram of the electrostatic repulsion mechanism of the membrane.
Composite membranes used for desalination are mostly polymer membranes doped with GO or GO composite materials, but the polymer can also be used as an intercalation material inserted between GO layers. As mentioned earlier, when GO is compounded with nanomaterials, the layer spacing is too large for desalination; although there is a large water flux, small ion rejection cannot be obtained. However, when polymer intercalation is used, while obtaining high nanometer-scale water channels, the cross-linked network of the polymer can also prevent the passage of salt ions. Jiawei Sun et al. [147] prepared GO membranes embedded with and cross-linked by PVA and supported on cellulose microfiltration membranes, by pressure-assisted filtration for total evaporative desalination of high-salinity water. Figure 21 is a schematic diagram of the preparation of the GO-based composite membrane. The authors demonstrated adjusting the transmission channel by appropriately adjusting the intercalation of the PVA, to achieve excellent stability of the membrane through covalent cross-linking.
In addition, the selection of a supporting substrate can improve desalination performance. For example, the performance of a PSF substrate has been improved by adding highly hydrophilic and negatively charged graphene oxide nanosheets. Several studies have demonstrated high water permeance and desalination by combination of GO and PSF membranes. [103, 148, 149]
For desalination applications, multiple polymers have been combined with GO-based materials. Compared with nanoparticle composites, which may be useful for dye/ion separations, polymer-based GO composite membranes are more suitable for desalination due to their control over the interlayer spacing, and the ability of the polymer network to provide additional screening. Polymer/GO composites can also achieve similar stability and antifouling properties as nanoparticle/GO composites. However, by comparing Table 3 and Table 4, we find, not surprisingly, that performance for desalination may sacrifice water flux. Table 4 summarizes some GO/polymer and GO/nanoparticle/polymer composite materials with improved desalination performance and their performance parameters.
Conclusions and outlook
Graphene-based and GO-based membranes exhibit extraordinary permeability properties, opening the door to the ultra-fast and highly selective transport of water and gas molecules. Graphene and its derivatives have excellent mechanical properties, single atomic layer structure, large specific surface area, and abundant modification methods which provide many opportunities for separations, desalination, and water purification.,
The modification of graphene-based membranes can be divided into three methods. The first is to directly perforate the graphene and to achieve particle screening performance by controlling the size of the holes. Perforation methods have been briefly reviewed: drilling holes in graphene membranes is a difficult process making it is expensive and complicated. Drilling may result in uneven pores and is not easy to scale to large quantities of material or large surface areas.
The second category of methods is embedding of nanomaterial and polymers between graphene and GO sheets. This intercalating method is used to control the interlayer spacing of the GO membrane to realize the screening of different substances. The primary nanomaterials used for intercalation include nanoparticles (e.g., MOF, COF, NH2-Fe3O4, and Ag nanoparticles) and nanotubes (carbon nanotubes, TiO2 nanotubes, and HNT). When forming GO/polymer composites, composite materials are usually doped with polymer membranes as fillers. GO-based polymer composites impart high hydrophilicity, high electronegativity, and unexpected antifouling properties. When the polymer is used as an intercalation material between GO layers, its unique cross-linking characteristics greatly improve the stability of the GO membrane.
The third method is to modify GO or graphene itself through introduction of charged and oxygen-containing functional groups to achieve performance enhancement. While, this method has poor scalability, it is a relatively simple method to improve performance.
On the basis of this review, these following four points should be addressed in future research on improving the performance of GO-based materials for desalination and decontamination:
-
1.
When preparing GO-based composite membrane materials, while improving water flux and solute rejection, the membrane mechanical strength cannot be ignored. This important property determines whether the prepared membrane will survive practical application. This is particularly important when GO is compounded with nanomaterials. Although a higher water flux and rejection rate are often obtained, this should not require compromising the strength of the membrane. When a polymer substrate is added or when GO is compounded with a polymer, although the strength of the membrane may be increased, this should not be at the expense of water flux and rejection properties. Cross-linking using small-molecule chemistries may provide better way to provide simultaneous control over size exclusion and membrane durability. Suitable cross-linking methods that can improve stability without affecting flux and retention remain an open area of exploration.
-
2.
In most solvents, GO spontaneously aggregates, and it is difficult to obtain effective dispersion. Researchers are working hard to overcome these difficulties. However, the impact of graphene-based membranes will continue to be at the forefront of research because of the potential for further development.
-
3.
In rejection tests, the rejection of anionic dyes is generally better than the rejection of cationic dyes, which may be attributed to the negative surface charge of GO. Some researchers have addressed this by changing the surface charge of the membrane, which affects other performance properties. Additional strategies aimed at addressing this issue should be pursued.
-
4.
Membrane fouling remains as a persistent challenge for the successful application of membrane technology in the field of water treatment. Without major breakthroughs in prevention of membrane fouling, many otherwise promising technologies may never be translated from laboratory development to industrial application.
References
Liu G, Jin W, Xu N (2016) Two-dimensional-material membranes: a new family of high-performance separation membranes. Angew Chem Int Ed 55(43):13384–13397. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201600438
Kim J, Cote LJ, Huang J (2012) Two dimensional soft material: new faces of graphene oxide. Acc Chem Res 45(8):1356–1364. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar300047s
Geim AK (2009) Graphene: status and prospects. Science 324(5934):1530–1534. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158877
Dreyer DR, Park S, Bielawski CW, Ruoff RS (2010) The chemistry of graphene oxide. Chem Soc Rev 39(1):228–240. https://doi.org/10.1039/b917103g
Liu G, Jin W, Xu N (2015) Graphene-based membranes. Chem Soc Rev 44(15):5016–5030. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cs00423j
Yang G, Xie ZL, Cran M, Ng D, Easton CD, Ding MM, Xu H, Gray S (2019) Functionalizing graphene oxide framework membranes with sulfonic acid groups for superior aqueous mixture separation. J Mater Chem A 7(34):19682–19690. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ta04031e
Padmavathy N, Behera SS, Pathan S, Das Ghosh L, Bose S (2019) Interlocked Graphene Oxide Provides Narrow Channels for Effective Water Desalination through Forward Osmosis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11(7):7566–7575. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b20598
Chen L, Shi G, Shen J, Peng B, Zhang B, Wang Y, Bian F, Wang J, Li D, Qian Z, Xu G, Liu G, Zeng J, Zhang L, Yang Y, Zhou G, Wu M, Jin W, Li J, Fang H (2017) Ion sieving in graphene oxide membranes via cationic control of interlayer spacing. Nature 550(7676):380–383. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24044
Du Y, Zhang X, Yang J, Lv Y, Zhang C, Xu Z-K (2020) Ultra-thin graphene oxide films via contra-diffusion method: Fast fabrication for ion rejection. J Membr Sci 595:117586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117586
Li Y, Zhao W, Weyland M, Yuan S, Xia Y, Liu H, Jian M, Yang J, Easton CD, Selomulya C, Zhang X (2019) Thermally reduced nanoporous graphene oxide membrane for desalination. Environ Sci Technol 53(14):8314–8323. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01914
Dong YP, Lin C, Gao SJ, Manoranjan N, Li WX, Fang WX, Jin J (2020) Single-layered GO/LDH hybrid nanoporous membranes with improved stability for salt and organic molecules rejection. J Membr Sci 607:118184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118184
Cha-Umpong W, Hosseini E, Razmjou A, Zakertabrizi M, Korayem AH, Chen V (2020) New molecular understanding of hydrated ion trapping mechanism during thermally-driven desalination by pervaporation using GO membrane. J Membr Sci 598:117687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117687
Mao Y, Huang Q, Meng B, Zhou K, Liu G, Gugliuzza A, Drioli E, Jin W (2020) Roughness-enhanced hydrophobic graphene oxide membrane for water desalination via membrane distillation. J Membr Sci 611:118364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118364
Cheng MM, Huang LJ, Wang YX, Zhao YC, Tang JG, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Hedayati M, Kipper MJ, Wickramasinghe SR (2019) Synthesis of graphene oxide/polyacrylamide composite membranes for organic dyes/water separation in water purification. J Mater Sci 54(1):252–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2828-9
Li J, Hu M, Pei H, Ma X, Yan F, Dlamini DS, Cui Z, He B, Li J, Matsuyama H (2020) Improved water permeability and structural stability in a polysulfone-grafted graphene oxide composite membrane used for dye separation. J Membr Sci 595:117547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117547
Xu Y, Peng G, Liao J, Shen J, Gao C (2020) Preparation of molecular selective GO/DTiO2-PDA-PEI composite nanofiltration membrane for highly pure dye separation. J Membr Sci 601:117727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117727
Cheng M-m, Huang L-j, Wang Y-x, Tang J-g, Wang Y, Zhao Y-c, Liu G-f, Zhang Y, Kipper MJ, Wickramasinghe SR (2018) Reduced graphene oxide–gold nanoparticle membrane for water purification. Sep Sci Technol 54(6):1079–1085. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2018.1525400
Zhang Y, Huang LJ, Wang YX, Tang JG, Wang Y, Cheng MM, Du YC, Yang K, Kipper MJ, Hedayati M (2019) The preparation and study of ethylene glycol-modified graphene oxide membranes for water purification. Polymers (Basel) 11(2):188. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11020188
Lin H, Li Y, Zhu J (2020) Cross-linked GO membranes assembled with GO nanosheets of differently sized lateral dimensions for organic dye and chromium separation. J Membr Sci 598:117789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117789
Alammar A, Park SH, Williams CJ, Derby B, Szekely G (2020) Oil -in -water separation with graphene-based nanocomposite membranes for produced water treatment. J Membr Sci, 603https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118007
Li F, Yu Z, Shi H, Yang Q, Chen Q, Pan Y, Zeng G, Yan L (2017) A Mussel-inspired method to fabricate reduced graphene oxide/g-C3N4 composites membranes for catalytic decomposition and oil-in-water emulsion separation. Chem Eng J 322:33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.03.145
Shao L, Yu Z, Li X, Zeng H, Liu Y (2019) One-step preparation of sepiolite/graphene oxide membrane for multifunctional oil-in-water emulsions separation. Appl Clay Sci 181:105208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2019.105208
Kim HW, Yoon HW, Yoon S-M, Yoo BM, Ahn BK, Cho YH, Shin HJ, Yang H, Paik U, Kwon S, Choi J-Y, Park HB (2013) Selective gas transport through few-layered graphene and graphene oxide membranes. Science 342(6154):91. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1236098
Ali A, Pothu R, Siyal SH, Phulpoto S, Sajjad M, Thebo KH (2019) Graphene-based membranes for CO2 separation. Mater Sci Energy Technol 2(1):83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mset.2018.11.002
Jin X, Foller T, Wen X, Ghasemian MB, Wang F, Zhang M, Bustamante H, Sahajwalla V, Kumar P, Kim H, Lee G-H, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Joshi R (2020) Effective separation of CO2 using metal-incorporated rGO membranes. Adv Mater 32(17):1907580. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201907580
Chi C, Wang X, Peng Y, Qian Y, Hu Z, Dong J, Zhao D (2016) Facile preparation of graphene oxide membranes for gas separation. Chem Mater 28(9):2921–2927. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04475
Lee W-C, Bondaz L, Huang S, He G, Dakhchoune M, Agrawal KV (2021) Centimeter-scale gas-sieving nanoporous single-layer graphene membrane. J Membr Sci 618:118745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118745
Zhao Y-c, Huang L-j, Wang Y-x, Tang J-g, Wang Y, Liu J-x, Belfiore LA, Kipper MJ (2016) Synthesis of graphene oxide/rare-earth complex hybrid luminescent materials via π-π stacking and their pH-dependent luminescence. J Alloy Compd 687:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.06.100
Y-x WANG, L-j HUANG, J-g TANG, WANG Y, LIU J-x, (2018) Surface modification and mechanism research of amorphous Mg-Ni-La hydrogen storage alloy with graphene/Ag nanocomposite. Chinese J Nonferrous Metals 3:9
Huang LJ, Wang YX, Tang JG, Zhao YC, Liu GF, Wang Y, Liu JX, Jiao JQ, Wang W, Jin B, Belfiore LA, Kipper MJ (2017) Graphene/silver nanocomposites stabilize Mg-Ni-La electrode alloys and enhance electrochemical performance. J Alloy Compd 694:1140–1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.068
Shen W, Zhao G, Zhang X, Bu F, Yun J, Tang J (2020) Using dual microresonant cavity and plasmonic effects to enhance the photovoltaic efficiency of flexible polymer solar cells. Nanomaterials (Basel) 10 (5). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10050944
Mi B, Zheng S, Tu Q (2018) 2D graphene oxide channel for water transport. Faraday Discuss 209:329–340. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8fd00026c
Yang K, Huang LJ, Wang YX, Du YC, Zhang ZJ, Wang Y, Kipper MJ, Belfiore LA, Tang JG (2020) Graphene oxide nanofiltration membranes containing silver nanoparticles: tuning separation efficiency via nanoparticle size. Nanomaterials (Basel) 10(3):454. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10030454
Du YC, Huang LJ, Wang YX, Yang K, Zhang ZJ, Wang Y, Kipper MJ, Belfiore LA, Tang JG (2020) Preparation of graphene oxide/silica hybrid composite membranes and performance studies in water treatment. J Mater Sci 55(25):11188–11202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04774-5
Liu GF, Huang LJ, Wang YX, Tang JG, Wang Y, Cheng MM, Zhang Y, Kipper MJ, Belfiore LA, Ranil WS (2017) Preparation of a graphene/silver hybrid membrane as a new nanofiltration membrane. Rsc Advances 7(77):49159–49165. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra07904d
Kang H, Shi J, Liu LY, Shan MJ, Xu ZW, Li N, Li J, Lv HM, Qian XM, Zhao LH (2018) Sandwich morphology and superior dye-removal performances for nanofiltration membranes self-assemblied via graphene oxide and carbon nanotubes. Appl Surf Sci 428:990–999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.212
Liu H, Zhu J, Hao L, Jiang Y, van der Bruggen B, Sotto A, Gao C, Shen J (2019) Thermo- and pH-responsive graphene oxide membranes with tunable nanochannels for water gating and permeability of small molecules. J Membr Sci 587:117163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.06.003
Abdelkader BA, Antar MA, Laoui T, Khan Z (2019) Development of graphene oxide-based membrane as a pretreatment for thermal seawater desalination. Desalination 465:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.04.028
Yang K, Huang LJ, Wang YX, Du YC, Tang JG, Wang Y, Cheng MM, Zhang Y, Kipper MJ, Belfiore LA, Wickramasinghe SR (2019) Graphene oxide/nanometal composite membranes for nanofiltration: synthesis, mass transport mechanism, and applications. New J Chem 43(7):2846–2860. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8nj06045b
Du Y-C, Huang L-J, Wang Y-X, Yang K, Tang J-G, Wang Y, Cheng M-M, Zhang Y, Kipper MJ, Belfiore LA, Ranil WS (2019) Recent developments in graphene-based polymer composite membranes: Preparation, mass transfer mechanism, and applications. J Appl Polym Sci 136(28):47761. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.47761
Zhang Z, Huang L, Wang Y, Yang K, Du Y, Wang Y, Kipper MJ, Belfiore LA, Tang J (2020) Theory and simulation developments of confined mass transport through graphene-based separation membranes. Phys Chem Chem Phys 22(11):6032–6057. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cp05551g
Cheng MM, Huang LJ, Wang YX, Tang JG, Wang Y, Zhao YC, Liu GF, Zhang Y, Kipper MJ, Belfiore LA, Ranil WS (2017) Recent developments in graphene-based/nanometal composite filter membranes. Rsc Advances 7(76):47886–47897. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra08098k
Surwade SP, Smirnov SN, Vlassiouk IV, Unocic RR, Veith GM, Dai S, Mahurin SM (2015) Water desalination using nanoporous single-layer graphene. Nat Nanotechnol 10(5):459–464. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.37
Jiang Y, Biswas P, Fortner JD (2016) A review of recent developments in graphene-enabled membranes for water treatment. Environ Sci-Water Res Technol 2(6):915–922. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ew00187d
Zhou KQ, Shi YQ, Jiang SH, Song L, Hu Y, Gui Z (2013) A facile liquid phase exfoliation method to prepare graphene sheets with different sizes expandable graphite. Mater Res Bull 48(9):2985–2992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2013.04.016
Bonaccorso F, Lombardo A, Hasan T, Sun Z, Colombo L, Ferrari AC (2012) Production and processing of graphene and 2d crystals. Mater Today 15(12):564–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(13)70014-2
Sutter P (2009) Epitaxial graphene: How silicon leaves the scene. Nat Mater 8(3):171–172. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2392
Kosynkin DV, Higginbotham AL, Sinitskii A, Lomeda JR, Dimiev A, Price BK, Tour JM (2009) Longitudinal unzipping of carbon nanotubes to form graphene nanoribbons. Nature 458(7240):872–876. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07872
Surana K, Singh PK, Bhattacharya B, Verma CS, Mehra RM (2015) Synthesis of graphene oxide coated Nafion membrane for actuator application. Ceram Int 41(3):5093–5099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.12.080
Li X, Cai W, Colombo L, Ruoff RS (2009) Evolution of graphene growth on Ni and Cu by carbon isotope labeling. Nano Lett 9(12):4268–4272. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl902515k
Yan Z, Lin J, Peng Z, Sun Z, Zhu Y, Li L, Xiang C, Samuel EL, Kittrell C, Tour JM (2013) Correction to toward the synthesis of wafer-scale single-crystal graphene on copper foils. ACS Nano 7(1):875–875. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn3057142
Xue C, Wang X, Zhu WY, Han Q, Zhu CH, Hong JL, Zhou XM, Jiang HJ (2014) Electrochemical serotonin sensing interface based on double-layered membrane of reduced graphene oxide/polyaniline nanocomposites and molecularly imprinted polymers embedded with gold nanoparticles. Sensors and Actuators B-Chemical 196:57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2014.01.100
Song N, Gao XL, Ma Z, Wang XJ, Wei Y, Gao CJ (2018) A review of graphene-based separation membrane: Materials, characteristics, preparation and applications. Desalination 437:59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.02.024
Cohen-Tanugi D, Grossman JC (2012) Water desalination across nanoporous graphene. Nano Lett 12(7):3602–3608. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl3012853
O’Hern SC, Boutilier MS, Idrobo JC, Song Y, Kong J, Laoui T, Atieh M, Karnik R (2014) Selective ionic transport through tunable subnanometer pores in single-layer graphene membranes. Nano Lett 14(3):1234–1241. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl404118f
Bai J, Zhong X, Jiang S, Huang Y, Duan X (2010) Graphene nanomesh. Nat Nanotechnol 5(3):190–194. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.8
Celebi K, Buchheim J, Wyss RM, Droudian A, Gasser P, Shorubalko I, Kye JI, Lee C, Park HG (2014) Ultimate permeation across atomically thin porous graphene. Science 344(6181):289–292. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1249097
Fischbein MD, Drndic M (2008) Electron beam nanosculpting of suspended graphene sheets. Applied Physics Letters 93 (11). doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2980518, Artn 113107
Merchant CA, Healy K, Wanunu M, Ray V, Peterman N, Bartel J, Fischbein MD, Venta K, Luo Z, Johnson AT, Drndic M (2010) DNA translocation through graphene nanopores. Nano Lett 10(8):2915–2921. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl101046t
Compton OC, Nguyen ST (2010) Graphene oxide, highly reduced graphene oxide, and graphene: versatile building blocks for carbon-based materials. Small 6(6):711–723. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200901934
Hu M, Mi B (2013) Enabling graphene oxide nanosheets as water separation membranes. Environ Sci Technol 47(8):3715–3723. https://doi.org/10.1021/es400571g
Tsou CH, An QF, Lo SC, De Guzman M, Hung WS, Hu CC, Lee KR, Lai JY (2015) Effect of microstructure of graphene oxide fabricated through different self-assembly techniques on 1-butanol dehydration. J Membr Sci 477:93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.12.039
Kulkarni DD, Choi I, Singamaneni SS, Tsukruk VV (2010) Graphene Oxide−Polyelectrolyte Nanomembranes. ACS Nano 4(8):4667–4676. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn101204d
Cote LJ, Kim F, Huang J (2009) Langmuir-Blodgett assembly of graphite oxide single layers. J Am Chem Soc 131(3):1043–1049. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja806262m
Li X, Zhang G, Bai X, Sun X, Wang X, Wang E, Dai H (2008) Highly conducting graphene sheets and Langmuir-Blodgett films. Nat Nanotechnol 3(9):538–542. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.210
Zhong J, Sun W, Wei Q, Qian X, Cheng HM, Ren W (2018) Efficient and scalable synthesis of highly aligned and compact two-dimensional nanosheet films with record performances. Nat Commun 9(1):3484. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05723-2
Su Y, Kravets VG, Wong SL, Waters J, Geim AK, Nair RR (2014) Impermeable barrier films and protective coatings based on reduced graphene oxide. Nat Commun 5:4843. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5843
Kulkarni HB, Tambe P, Joshi GM (2018) Influence of covalent and non-covalent modification of graphene on the mechanical, thermal and electrical properties of epoxy/graphene nanocomposites: a review. Composite Interfaces 25(5–7):381–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/09276440.2017.1361711
Zhang P, Gong J-L, Zeng G-M, Deng C-H, Yang H-C, Liu H-Y, Huan S-Y (2017) Cross-linking to prepare composite graphene oxide-framework membranes with high-flux for dyes and heavy metal ions removal. Chem Eng J 322:657–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.04.068
Zhu L, Swihart MT, Lin H (2017) Tightening polybenzimidazole (PBI) nanostructure via chemical cross-linking for membrane H2/CO2 separation. J Mater Chem A 5(37):19914–19923. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA03874G
Kita H, Inada T, Tanaka K, Okamoto K-i (1994) Effect of photocrosslinking on permeability and permselectivity of gases through benzophenone- containing polyimide. J Membr Sci 87(1):139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(93)E0098-X
Thayumanavan N, Tambe P, Joshi G (2015) Effect of surfactant and sodium alginate modification of graphene on the mechanical and thermal properties of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) nanocomposites. Cell Chem Technol 49(1):69–80
Lei W-W, Li H, Shi L-Y, Diao Y-F, Zhang Y-L, Ran R, Ni W (2017) Achieving enhanced hydrophobicity of graphene membranes by covalent modification with polydimethylsiloxane. Appl Surf Sci 404:230–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.292
Prince JA, Bhuvana S, Anbharasi V, Ayyanar N, Boodhoo KVK, Singh G (2016) Ultra-wetting graphene-based membrane. J Membr Sci 500:76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.11.024
Sun P, Zhu M, Wang K, Zhong M, Wei J, Wu D, Xu Z, Zhu H (2013) Selective Ion Penetration of Graphene Oxide Membranes. ACS Nano 7(1):428–437. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn304471w
Jin LM, Wang ZY, Zheng SX, Mi BX (2018) Polyamide-crosslinked graphene oxide membrane for forward osmosis. J Membr Sci 545:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.09.023
Rezac ME, Todd Sorensen E, Beckham HW (1997) Transport properties of crosslinkable polyimide blends. J Membr Sci 136(1):249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00170-1
Alam S, Kandpal LD, Varma IK (1993) Ethynyl-Terminated Imide Oligomers. J Macromolecular Sci, Part C 33(3):291–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/15321799308021438
Sefcik MD, Stejskal EO, McKay RA, Schaefer J (1979) Investigation of the structure of acetylene-terminated polyimide resins using magic-angle Carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance. Macromolecules 12(3):423–425. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma60069a015
Yang E, Karahan HE, Goh K, Chuah CY, Wang R, Bae TH (2019) Scalable fabrication of graphene-based laminate membranes for liquid and gas separations by crosslinking-induced gelation and doctor-blade casting. Carbon 155:129–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.08.058
Liu JC, Yu LJ, Yue GC, Wang N, Cui ZM, Hou LL, Li JH, Li QZ, Karton A, Cheng QF, Jiang L, Zhao Y (2019) Thermoresponsive Graphene Membranes with Reversible Gating Regularity for Smart Fluid Control. Advanced Functional Materials 29 (12). doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201808501
Li W, Zhang Y, Su P, Xu Z, Zhang G, Shen C, Meng Q (2016) Metal–organic framework channelled graphene composite membranes for H2/CO2separation. J Mater Chem A 4(48):18747–18752. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ta09362k
Nair RR, Wu HA, Jayaram PN, Grigorieva IV, Geim AK (2012) Unimpeded Permeation of Water Through Helium-Leak–Tight Graphene-Based Membranes. Science 335(6067):442. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1211694
El-Deen AG, Choi JH, Kim CS, Khalil KA, Almajid AA, Barakat NAM (2015) TiO2 nanorod-intercalated reduced graphene oxide as high performance electrode material for membrane capacitive deionization. Desalination 361:53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.01.033
Sui D, Huang Y, Huang L, Liang J, Ma Y, Chen Y (2011) Flexible and transparent electrothermal film heaters based on graphene materials. Small 7(22):3186–3192. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201101305
Wang W, Eftekhari E, Zhu G, Zhang X, Yan Z, Li Q (2014) Graphene oxide membranes with tunable permeability due to embedded carbon dots. Chem Commun (Camb) 50(86):13089–13092. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cc05295a
Gao SJ, Qin HL, Liu PP, Jin J (2015) SWCNT-intercalated GO ultrathin films for ultrafast separation of molecules. J Mater Chem A 3(12):6649–6654. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta00366k
Zhang L, Shi Y, Wang L, Hu C (2018) AgBr-wrapped Ag chelated on nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide for water purification under visible light. Appl Catal B 220:118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.08.038
Ranjith KS, Manivel P, Rajendrakumar RT, Uyar T (2017) Multifunctional ZnO nanorod-reduced graphene oxide hybrids nanocomposites for effective water remediation: Effective sunlight driven degradation of organic dyes and rapid heavy metal adsorption. Chem Eng J 325:588–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.05.105
Nguyen DCT, Oh WC (2018) Ternary self-assembly method of mesoporous silica and Cu2O combined graphene composite by nonionic surfactant and photocatalytic degradation of cationic-anionic dye pollutants. Sep Purif Technol 190:77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.08.054
Jiang YQ, Chowdhury S, Balasubramanian R (2017) Nitrogen-doped graphene hydrogels as potential adsorbents and photocatalysts for environmental remediation. Chem Eng J 327:751–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.06.156
Safarpour M, Vatanpour V, Khataee A, Esmaeili M (2015) Development of a novel high flux and fouling-resistant thin film composite nanofiltration membrane by embedding reduced graphene oxide/TiO2. Sep Purif Technol 154:96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2015.09.039
Safarpour M, Khataee A, Vatanpour V (2015) Thin film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membrane modified by reduced graphene oxide/TiO2 with improved desalination performance. J Membr Sci 489:43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.04.010
Guan KC, Zhao D, Zhang MC, Shen J, Zhou GY, Liu GP, Jin WQ (2017) 3D nanoporous crystals enabled 2D channels in graphene membrane with enhanced water purification performance. J Membr Sci 542:41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.055
Chen X, Qiu M, Ding H, Fu K, Fan Y (2016) A reduced graphene oxide nanofiltration membrane intercalated by well-dispersed carbon nanotubes for drinking water purification. Nanoscale 8(10):5696–5705. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nr08697c
Yuan X, Li W, Liu H, Han N, Zhang X (2016) A novel PVDF/graphene composite membrane based on electrospun nanofibrous film for oil/water emulsion separation. Composites Communications 2:5–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2016.10.001
Madauß L, Schumacher J, Ghosh M, Ochedowski O, Meyer J, Lebius H, Ban-d’Etat B, Toimil-Molares ME, Trautmann C, Lammertink RGH, Ulbricht M, Schleberger M (2017) Fabrication of nanoporous graphene/polymer composite membranes. Nanoscale 9(29):10487–10493. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR02755A
Hung W-S, Lin T-J, Chiao Y-H, Sengupta A, Hsiao Y-C, Wickramasinghe SR, Hu C-C, Lee K-R, Lai J-Y (2018) Graphene-induced tuning of the d-spacing of graphene oxide composite nanofiltration membranes for frictionless capillary action-induced enhancement of water permeability. J Mater Chem A 6(40):19445–19454. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA08155G
Thakur AK, Singh SP, Kleinberg MN, Gupta A, Arnusch CJ (2019) Laser-Induced Graphene–PVA Composites as Robust Electrically Conductive Water Treatment Membranes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11(11):10914–10921. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b00510
Yin J, Zhu GC, Deng BL (2016) Graphene oxide (GO) enhanced polyamide (PA) thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) membrane for water purification. Desalination 379:93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.11.001
Zhu JY, Tian MM, Hou JW, Wang J, Lin JY, Zhang YT, Liu JD, Van der Bruggen B (2016) Surface zwitterionic functionalized graphene oxide for a novel loose nanofiltration membrane. J Mater Chem A 4(5):1980–1990. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta08024j
Wang J, Zhang P, Liang B, Liu Y, Xu T, Wang L, Cao B, Pan K (2016) Graphene Oxide as an Effective Barrier on a Porous Nanofibrous Membrane for Water Treatment. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(9):6211–6218. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b12723
Lai GS, Lau WJ, Goh PS, Ismail AF, Yusof N, Tan YH (2016) Graphene oxide incorporated thin film nanocomposite nanofiltration membrane for enhanced salt removal performance. Desalination 387:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.03.007
Wang J, Gao X, Wang J, Wei Y, Li Z, Gao C (2015) O-(carboxymethyl)-chitosan nanofiltration membrane surface functionalized with graphene oxide nanosheets for enhanced desalting properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(7):4381–4389. https://doi.org/10.1021/am508903g
Chae HR, Lee J, Lee CH, Kim IC, Park PK (2015) Graphene oxide-embedded thin-film composite reverse osmosis membrane with high flux, anti-biofouling, and chlorine resistance. J Membrane Sci 483(Complete):128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.02.045
Yang HY, Wang NX, Wang L, Liu HX, An QF, Ji SL (2018) Vacuum-assisted assembly of ZIF-8@GO composite membranes on ceramic tube with enhanced organic solvent nanofiltration performance. J Membr Sci 545:158–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.09.074
Wang C, Cheng P, Yao Y, Yamauchi Y, Yan X, Li J, Na J (2020) In-situ fabrication of nanoarchitectured MOF filter for water purification. J Hazard Mater 392:122164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122164
Zhao GK, Hu RR, Zhao XL, He YJ, Zhu HW (2019) High flux nanofiltration membranes prepared with a graphene oxide homo-structure. J Membr Sci 585:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.05.028
Fan XF, Liu YM, Quan X (2019) A novel reduced graphene oxide/carbon nanotube hollow fiber membrane with high forward osmosis performance. Desalination 451:117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.07.020
Cheng P, Chen Y, Gu YH, Yan X, Lang WZ (2019) Hybrid 2D WS2/GO nanofiltration membranes for finely molecular sieving.J Membr Sci, 591 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117308
Dong L, Li M, Zhang S, Si X, Bai Y, Zhang C (2020) NH2-Fe3O4-regulated graphene oxide membranes with well-defined laminar nanochannels for desalination of dye solutions. Desalination 476:114227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.114227
Liu X, Demir NK, Wu Z, Li K (2015) highly water-stable zirconium metal-organic framework UiO-66 membranes supported on alumina hollow fibers for desalination. J Am Chem Soc 137(22):6999–7002. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b02276
Li W, Li J, Wang N, Li X, Zhang Y, Ye Q, Ji S, An Q-F (2020) Recovery of bio-butanol from aqueous solution with ZIF-8 modified graphene oxide composite membrane. J Membr Sci 598:117671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117671
Bonakala S, Lalitha A, Shin JE, Moghadam F, Semino R, Park HB, Maurin G (2018) Understanding of the Graphene Oxide/Metal-Organic Framework Interface at the Atomistic Scale. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(39):33619–33629. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b09851
Peng Y, Yu Z, Li F, Chen Q, Yin D, Min X (2018) A novel reduced graphene oxide-based composite membrane prepared via a facile deposition method for multifunctional applications: oil/water separation and cationic dyes removal. Sep Purif Technol 200:130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.01.059
Han Y, Jiang YQ, Gao C (2015) High-flux graphene oxide nanofiltration membrane intercalated by carbon nanotubes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(15):8147–8155. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b00986
Yuan XT, Xu CX, Geng HZ, Ji Q, Wang L, He B, Jiang Y, Kong J, Li J (2020) Multifunctional PVDF/CNT/GO mixed matrix membranes for ultrafiltration and fouling detection. J Hazard Mater 384:120978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120978
Zhan YQ, He SJ, Wan XY, Zhao SM, Bai YL (2018) Thermally and chemically stable poly(arylene ether nitrile)/halloysite nanotubes intercalated graphene oxide nanofibrous composite membranes for highly efficient oil/water emulsion separation in harsh environment. J Membr Sci 567:76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.09.037
Liu MX, Jia ZX, Jia DM, Zhou CR (2014) Recent advance in research on halloysite nanotubes-polymer nanocomposite. Prog Polym Sci 39(8):1498–1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.04.004
Liu YC, Tu WW, Chen MY, Ma LL, Yang B, Liang QL, Chen YY (2018) A mussel-induced method to fabricate reduced graphene oxide/halloysite nanotubes membranes for multifunctional applications in water purification and oil/water separation. Chem Eng J 336:263–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.043
Kunimatsu M, Nakagawa K, Yoshioka T, Shintani T, Yasui T, Kamio E, Tsang SCE, Li JX, Matsuyama H (2020) Design of niobate nanosheet-graphene oxide composite nanofiltration membranes with improved permeability.J Membr Sci, 595https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117598
Ma J, Tang XD, He Y, Fan Y, Chen JY, Yu H (2020) Robust stable MoS2/GO filtration membrane for effective removal of dyes and salts from water with enhanced permeability. Desalination 480:114328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114328
Abraham J, Vasu KS, Williams CD, Gopinadhan K, Su Y, Cherian CT, Dix J, Prestat E, Haigh SJ, Grigorieva IV, Carbone P, Geim AK, Nair RR (2017) Tunable sieving of ions using graphene oxide membranes. Nat Nanotechnol 12(6):546–550. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2017.21
Lecaros RLG, Mendoza GEJ, Hung WS, An QF, Caparanga AR, Tsai HA, Hu CC, Lee KR, Lai JY (2017) Tunable interlayer spacing of composite graphene oxide-framework membrane for acetic acid dehydration. Carbon 123:660–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.08.019
Sun JQ, Hu CZ, Liu ZT, Liu HJ, Qu JH (2019) Surface charge and hydrophilicity improvement of graphene membranes via modification of pore surface oxygen-containing groups to enhance permeability and selectivity. Carbon 145:140–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.12.098
Chen L, Li YH, Chen LN, Li N, Dong CL, Chen Q, Liu BB, Ai Q, Si PC, Feng JK, Zhang L, Suhr J, Lou J, Ci LJ (2018) A large-area free-standing graphene oxide multilayer membrane with high stability for nanofiltration applications. Chem Eng J 345:536–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.136
Liu YC, Yu ZX, Peng YX, Shao LY, Li XH, Zeng HJ (2020) A novel photocatalytic self-cleaning TiO2 nanorods inserted graphene oxide-based nanofiltration membrane.Chem Phys Lett, 749https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2020.137424
Hou JK, Chen YB, Shi WX, Bao CL, Hu XY (2020) Graphene oxide/methylene blue composite membrane for dyes separation: Formation mechanism and separation performance. Appl Surf Sci, 505https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144145
Shen HP, Wang NX, Ma K, Wang L, Chen G, Ji SL (2017) Tuning inter-layer spacing of graphene oxide laminates with solvent green to enhance its nanofiltration performance. J Membr Sci 527:43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.01.003
Chang YH, Shen YD, Kong DB, Ning J, Xiao ZC, Liang JX, Zhi LJ (2017) Fabrication of the reduced preoxidized graphene-based nanofiltration membranes with tunable porosity and good performance. Rsc Advances 7(5):2544–2549. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra24746f
Wu H, Tang B, Wu P (2014) Development of novel SiO2–GO nanohybrid/polysulfone membrane with enhanced performance. J Membr Sci 451:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.09.018
Lattemann S, Hopner T (2008) Environmental impact and impact assessment of seawater desalination. Desalination 220(1–3):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.03.009
Bartels C, Franks R, Rybar S, Schierach M, Wilf M (2005) The effect of feed ionic strength on salt passage through reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 184(1–3):185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.032
Hilal N, Al-Zoubi H, Darwish NA, Mohammad AW, Abu Arabi M (2004) A comprehensive review of nanofiltration membranes: Treatment, pretreatment, modelling, and atomic force microscopy. Desalination 170(3):281–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2004.01.007
Greenlee LF, Lawler DF, Freeman BD, Marrot B, Moulin P (2009) Reverse osmosis desalination: Water sources, technology, and today’s challenges. Water Res 43(9):2317–2348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.03.010
Fang YY, Bian LX, Bi QY, Li Q, Wang XL (2014) Evaluation of the pore size distribution of a forward osmosis membrane in three different ways. J Membr Sci 454:390–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.046
Mohammad AW, Teow YH, Ang WL, Chung YT, Oatley-Radcliffe DL, Hilal N (2015) Nanofiltration membranes review: Recent advances and future prospects. Desalination 356:226–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.10.043
You Y, Sahajwalla V, Yoshimura M, Joshi RK (2016) Graphene and graphene oxide for desalination. Nanoscale 8(1):117–119. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nr06154g
Yuan YQ, Gao XL, Wei Y, Wang XY, Wang J, Zhang YS, Gao CJ (2017) Enhanced desalination performance of carboxyl functionalized graphene oxide nanofiltration membranes. Desalination 405:29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.11.024
Sheath P, Majumder M (2016) Flux accentuation and improved rejection in graphene-based filtration membranes produced by capillary-force-assisted self-assembly. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 374 (2060). doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0028
Zhu LP, Wang HX, Bai J, Liu JD, Zhang YT (2017) A porous graphene composite membrane intercalated by halloysite nanotubes for efficient dye desalination. Desalination 420:145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.07.008
Strathmann H (2010) Electrodialysis, a mature technology with a multitude of new applications. Desalination 264(3):268–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.04.069
Li YJ, Shi SY, Gao HB, Zhao ZJ, Su CL, Wen H (2018) Improvement of the antifouling performance and stability of an anion exchange membrane by surface modification with graphene oxide (GO) and polydopamine (PDA). J Membr Sci 566:44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.08.054
Mikhaylin S, Bazinet L (2016) Fouling on ion-exchange membranes: Classification, characterization and strategies of prevention and control. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 229:34–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2015.12.006
Karkooti A, Yazdi AZ, Chen P, McGregor M, Nazemifard N, Sadrzadeh M (2018) Development of advanced nanocomposite membranes using graphene nanoribbons and nanosheets for water treatment. J Membr Sci 560:97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.04.034
Wang X, Wang HX, Wang YM, Gao J, Liu JD, Zhang YT (2019) Hydrotalcite/graphene oxide hybrid nanosheets functionalized nanofiltration membrane for desalination. Desalination 451:209–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.05.012
Sun JW, Qian XW, Wang ZH, Zeng FX, Bai HC, Li N (2020) Tailoring the microstructure of poly(vinyl alcohol)-intercalated graphene oxide membranes for enhanced desalination performance of high-salinity water by pervaporation. J Membr Sci, 599https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.117838
Wei Y, Zhang YS, Gao XL, Yuan YQ, Su BW, Gao CJ (2016) Declining flux and narrowing nanochannels under wrinkles of compacted graphene oxide nanofiltration membranes. Carbon 108:568–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.07.056
Ganesh BM, Isloor AM, Ismail AF (2013) Enhanced hydrophilicity and salt rejection study of graphene oxide-polysulfone mixed matrix membrane. Desalination 313:199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.11.037
Qian YL, Zhou C, Huang AS (2018) Cross-linking modification with diamine monomers to enhance desalination performance of graphene oxide membranes. Carbon 136:28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.062
Zhang M, Guan K, Ji Y, Liu G, Jin W, Xu N (2019) Controllable ion transport by surface-charged graphene oxide membrane. Nat Commun 10(1):1253. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09286-8
Zhang P, Gong J-L, Zeng G-M, Song B, Cao W, Liu H-Y, Huan S-Y, Peng P (2019) Novel “loose” GO/MoS2 composites membranes with enhanced permeability for effective salts and dyes rejection at low pressure. J Membr Sci 574:112–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.12.046
Xu YQ, Wu MY, Yu SY, Zhao Y, Gao CJ, Shen JN (2019) Ultrathin and stable graphene oxide film via intercalation polymerization of polydopamine for preparation of digital inkjet printing dye. J Membr Sci 586:15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.05.057
Grasso G, Galiano F, Yoo MJ, Mancuso R, Park HB, Gabriele B, Figoli A, Drioli E (2020) Development of graphene-PVDF composite membranes for membrane distillation.J Membr Sci, 604https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118017
Zhang HJ, Li B, Pan JF, Qi YW, Shen JN, Gao CJ, Van der Bruggen B (2017) Carboxyl-functionalized graphene oxide polyamide nanofiltration membrane for desalination of dye solutions containing monovalent salt. J Membr Sci 539:128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.05.075
Xu SJ, Li F, Su BW, Hu MZ, Gao XL, Gao CJ (2019) Novel graphene quantum dots (GQDs)-incorporated thin film composite (TFC) membranes for forward osmosis (FO) desalination. Desalination 451:219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.04.004
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the (1) Natural Scientific Foundation of China (Grant no. 51878361, 52070104, 51503112); Natural Scientific Foundation of Shandong Province (Grant No. ZR2019MEM048); (2) State Key Project of International Cooperation Research (2016YFE0110800, 2017YFE0108300); the National Program for Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (“111” plan); 1st class discipline program of Materials Science of Shandong Province, The Double-Hundred Foreign Expert Program of Shandong Province (2019–2021).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
Additional information
Handling Editor: Mark Bissett.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Han, Zy., Huang, Lj., Qu, Hj. et al. A review of performance improvement strategies for graphene oxide-based and graphene-based membranes in water treatment. J Mater Sci 56, 9545–9574 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-05873-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-05873-7