Abstract
Niche partitioning is an important mechanism for allowing ecologically similar species to coexist, contributing to biodiversity and the functioning of ecological communities. Species partition niches by taking advantage of environmental heterogeneity. However, niche partitioning and species coexistence investigations often do not include intraspecific variation or individual differences like sex and body size even though these factors can have important ecological consequences. Such intrapopulation factors can reduce the number of individuals among species that overlap in resource use and potentially facilitate coexistence. Using stable isotopes (δ13C and δ15N), we quantified dietary differences among three ecologically similar, sympatric watersnake species: Nerodia erythrogaster, N. rhombifer and N. sipedon. Additionally for each species, we determined intraspecific dietary patterns and determined how those within-species patterns may contribute to dietary niche partitioning among species. Nerodia erythrogaster fed more on terrestrial prey, while N. rhombifer fed at higher trophic levels. Females across species fed at higher trophic levels than did males, and isotopic variance differed between the sexes in N. sipedon. Larger watersnakes foraged at higher trophic levels and fed more on terrestrial prey. Each watersnake species had a distinct diet that overlapped to some degree with the other species’ diets, but these diets varied both between sexes and among size groups within species. This inter- and intraspecific dietary variation can facilitate species coexistence by reducing the number of individuals from all species that use the same resources. Intraspecific variation can add important and nuanced layers to the evolution of species coexistence, and research on interspecific niche relationships needs to increasingly consider the effects of these intraspecific variations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Niche partitioning is an important ecological concept in part because it can reconcile theoretical and laboratory studies that demonstrate competitive exclusion (Gause 1934; Hutchinson 1961; MacArthur and Levins 1967) with field observations and studies that demonstrate widespread coexistence among ecologically similar species (MacArthur 1958; Hutchinson 1959; Hardin 1960). Interspecific niche partitioning is ubiquitous in all ecosystems and is a key component to understanding biodiversity and community structure (Schoener 1974; Pianka 1975; Hadi et al. 2012). Slight differences in morphology and behavior that can facilitate the partitioning of limited resources have evolved among closely related or ecologically similar species (Roughgarden 1976; Gittleman and Van Valkenburgh 1997; Dayan and Simberloff 2005). Species can partition dietary resources in several different ways, often taking advantage of spatial or temporal resource heterogeneity (Schoener 1968; Pianka 1973, 1975). Ecologically similar species can forage in different habitats or microhabitats (van Beest et al. 2014; Lürig et al. 2016), on different resources (Langeland et al. 1991; Vassilieva et al. 2017), or at different trophic levels (Cherel et al. 2010; Beaulieu and Sockman 2012).
Recent work has demonstrated the importance of intraspecific dietary variation and niche partitioning within species and populations (Sheppard et al. 2018; Costa-Pereira et al. 2019; Falke et al. 2020). In species that are dietary generalists, individuals often use only a subset of the dietary items used by the species as a whole (Bolnick et al. 2007; Woo et al. 2008). Intraspecific resource variation can occur between the sexes and among ontogenetic stages, morphotypes, and individuals (Sabatés and Saiz 2000; Bolnick et al. 2003; Mata et al. 2016; Egan et al. 2018). Diets can differ dramatically across ontogeny and between sexes, the most common contributors to intraspecific dietary variation. Ontogenetic niche shifts are widely documented (Olson 1996; Rudolf and Rasmussen 2013; Nakazawa 2015; Samplonius et al. 2016), and are largely driven by body size differences (Cloyed and Eason 2017; Dalponti et al. 2018). Similarly, sexual size dimorphisms often result in dietary and trophic differences between the sexes (Bearhop et al. 2006; Zalewski 2007; Voigt et al. 2018). These types of intraspecific variations in resource use reduce competition among conspecifics by decreasing the number of individuals that are competing for the same resources (Svanbäck and Bolnick 2005; Bolnick et al. 2007).
Given that intraspecific variation reduces the number of individuals that use certain resources, it can also affect interspecific niche partitioning. Among species that vary in size through ontogeny, only certain ontogenetic groups may overlap in resource use (Canavero et al. 2014; Kliemann et al. 2019); for example, smaller, younger individuals of a larger species may overlap in resource use with larger, older individuals of a smaller species (Cloyed and Eason 2017). Likewise, differential resource use between the sexes can lead to each sex overlapping in resource use with different species (Broekhuis et al. 2018). The net effect of these types of intraspecific variation is a reduction in the number of individuals from each species that overlap in resource use with other species, and thus they may facilitate species coexistence (Lichstein et al. 2007; Lasky et al. 2014; Cloyed and Eason 2017).
Here we used stable isotopes from three watersnake species, Nerodia erythrogaster (plain-bellied watersnake), N. rhombifer (diamondback watersnake), and N. sipedon (northern watersnake), to investigate niche partitioning among species and how intraspecific diet variation mediates that partitioning. Although there is some disagreement about the monophyly and phylogeny of the genus Nerodia, N. erythrogaster and N. sipedon are more closely related to one another than to N. rhombifer (Alfaro and Arnold 2001; McVay et al. 2015). These watersnake species are dietary generalists with considerable overlap in diet, feeding mainly on fish and amphibians (Mushinsky and Hebrard 1977; Kofron 1978; Plummer and Goy 1984; Himes 2003). All three species often coexist, may use similar habitats and are found in or near bodies of water (Tucker 1995; Burbrink et al. 1998; Laurent and Kingsbury 2003). Watersnakes are also known to partition dietary resources intraspecifically between sexes, as females are often larger (Mushinsky et al. 1982; King 1993), and ontogenetically, as they are gape-limited predators that change their diets as they grow (Mushinsky et al. 1982; Plummer and Goy 1984). Specifically, we determined how sex, size and their interaction influenced diet, niche partitioning and species coexistence among sympatric watersnakes. We predicted that watersnake species would overlap in their dietary resources but that intraspecific variability based on snake sex and size would result in only subgroups of each species overlapping in diet use.
Methods
Research site
We performed our study at Hardy Slough Tract (37° 50′ 32.50″ N, 87° 45′ 1.91″ W), a 100-ha section within the Sloughs Wildlife Management Area (Henderson County, Kentucky, USA) that is managed primarily for wintering waterfowl by the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources. Hardy Slough Tract is located 2 km southeast of the Ohio River and includes moist soil units (shallow wetlands delineated by a levee system), scrub-shrub wetlands and palustrine forest. Water primrose (Ludwigia sp.), smartweed (Polygonum sp.), water lily (Nuphar sp.), cattail (Typha sp.), buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), black willow (Salix nigra) and hackberry (Celtis occidentalis) were the dominant plant species within Hardy Slough Tract.
Snake and prey sampling
We collected snake and prey data from April to September in 2013 and 2014 and captured snakes with a variety of methods, including hand capture, cover boards, stand-alone aquatic funnel traps and drift fence-funnel traps arrays (terrestrial and aquatic) (Fitzgerald 2012). For each captured watersnake, we measured snout-vent length (SVL) and determined sex by cloacal probing. We marked snakes using subcutaneous pit tags and unique ventral scale-clip patterns to identify recaptures (Gibbons and Andrews 2004; Plummer and Ferner 2012) and used the clipped scales for stable isotope analysis. To prevent sampling watersnakes that might retain maternal isotopic signatures, we obtained scale clips only from watersnakes ≥ 275 mm SVL. We released each snake at its capture location.
To determine prey availability and obtain prey stable isotope samples, we sampled potential snake prey (e.g., amphibians, fishes, invertebrates) weekly using a combination of traps designed for different habitats, prey types and prey sizes. Traps were open for 2 days and nights (48 h) every week during the sampling periods. For aquatic prey, we used stand-alone aquatic funnel traps, aquatic hoop traps and aquatic drift fence-funnel trap arrays (Hubert et al. 2012). The upper 25% of each aquatic funnel trap was above water to prevent the drowning of non-target animals. For terrestrial prey, we used drift fence-funnel trap arrays with pit-fall traps (5-gallon buckets) (Fitzgerald 2012). Drift fences were built with silt fencing and wooden stakes. Prey items that we captured and recorded included amphibians, fish and crayfish. Anurans were recorded as tadpoles, metamorphs (i.e., tadpoles that had well-defined legs and thus were beginning to show adult traits), froglets (recently metamorphosed frogs with no tadpole traits) or adults (McDiarmid and Altig 1999).
Stable isotope analysis
We performed stable isotope analyses using scale clips from each individual watersnake and tissue samples obtained from a subset (20%) of captured potential prey animals. Prey samples included whole bodies of anuran tadpoles, anuran metamorphs and fishes with standard length < 50 mm (Sanderson et al. 2009; Trakimas et al. 2011); toe clips of the tip of the longest toe on a hind foot for froglets and adult frogs (Trakimas et al. 2011); a caudal fin sample (7 mm diameter) for fishes with standard length ≥ 50 mm (Sanderson et al. 2009); the distal end of salamander tails (3 mm; Milanovich and Maerz 2012); and a 3 mm sample of the uropod exoskeleton of crayfish (Hollows et al. 2002). While sampling the whole body of prey is ideal, sampling specific tissues or section of adult individuals prevented unnecessary sacrifice of animals, and the prey tissues we sampled provide information regarding their habitat use (Sanderson et al. 2009; Milanovich and Maerz 2012; Cloyed and Eason 2016, 2017).
Samples were stored in a − 80 °C freezer until they were dried in an oven for 48 h at 60 °C. Samples were then stored in plastic vials in darkness, a standard procedure for storing dry samples. We did not extract lipids because carbon to nitrogen ratios were 3.16–3.18 (Tronquart et al. 2012). We homogenized samples with mortar and pestle when necessary; samples weighed 1.24 mg ± 0.34 (mean ± SE; all means are reported ± SE) and were placed in 3.5 × 5 mm tin capsules. All stable isotope samples were analyzed for carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) isotope values at the University of California, Davis Stable Isotope Facility using a PDZ Europa ANCA-GSL elemental analyzer interfaced with a PDZ Europa 20-20 isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Sercon Ltd., Cheshire, UK). Stable isotope values were expressed in standard delta notation (δ) in parts per thousand (‰), where δX = (Rsample/Rstandard − 1) × 1000, with Rsample and Rstandard being the molar ratios of C13/C12 and N15/N14 of the sample and the standard reference material. The standard reference material was Vienna PeeDee Belemnite for carbon and atmospheric N2 for nitrogen. Instrument precision was 0.07‰ for δ13C and 0.13‰ for δ15N.
Statistical analyses
We used δ13C or δ15N stable isotope values to examine niche partitioning among species, between sexes and across snake sizes (< 450 mm SVL, 450–650 mm SVL, 650–850 mm SVL and > 850 mm SVL). We determined these size classes based on the size range of captured individuals across all three species, having an adequate sample size in each class, and using size divisions (200 mm increments) that would be adequate to identify potential shifts in diet. Nerodia sipedon was not included in the largest size class because all captured N. sipedon had a SVL < 850 mm. We used general linear models with δ13C or δ15N as a dependent variable, and watersnake species, sex, snake size classes, year and all possible interactions as independent variables. When main effects were significant, we used follow-up Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison tests. We also performed regression analyses comparing watersnake species, with δ13C and δ15N as dependent variables and SVL (mm) as the independent variable. In this study, we utilized SVL as a size class predictor variable in some analyses and as a continuous variable in other analyses; the size classes enabled us to compare variances and group means, and the continuous variable more precisely determined the relationship of snake size with isotopic change.
We used isotopic variances (δ13C and δ15N) to investigate dietary niche width across species, sexes and sizes with higher variance indicating feeding across a greater number of habitats or trophic levels (Bearhop et al. 2004; Fink et al. 2012). We used Levene’s test for homogeneity of variance and Tukey-type multiple comparison tests to determine differences in isotopic variances among species and between sexes (Fink et al. 2012). We investigated isotopic variance due to size only within species, so as to reduce the probability of Type I error, by dividing each species into 100-mm size classes (300–399 mm SVL, 400–499 mm SVL, etc.) and then using linear and quadratic regressions between isotopic variance and size class. When both regression types were significant or marginally significant, we used Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) values to determine which better fit the data (Burnham and Anderson 2002).
We used the Bayesian stable isotope mixing models, Stable Isotope Analysis in R (SIAR v4; Parnell et al. 2010) to estimate the proportions of prey (dietary groups) in consumer diets (snake species, sex, and size classes). We employed trophic discrimination factors of 0.17‰ (± 0.03) for δ13C and 2.8‰ (± 0.11) for δ15N, which were obtained from green sea turtles, Chelonia mydas (Seminoff et al. 2006), the most closely related reptile for which we had discrimination information for skin. All reported watersnake stable isotope results for this study have been corrected by subtracting these trophic discrimination factors from the original isotope data. Results were reported as mean proportion of each resource for each of the snake groups along with 95% credible intervals (Parnell et al. 2010). All other statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (SAS Institute 2000), and statistical tests were considered to be significant at α = 0.05. If data did not meet assumptions for parametric analyses, we performed square root transformations on dependent variables.
Results
Analyses of isotopic ratios among and within species
We obtained stable isotope samples from 299 potential prey individuals (154 in 2013 and 145 in 2014). Stable isotope values of prey clustered into six groups: aquatic salamanders, tadpole/metamorph anurans, froglet/adult anurans, crayfish, Lepisosteidae and all other fishes. For simplicity, we will refer to the non-lepisosteid fishes as ‘fishes.’ The δ13C and δ15N residuals were both normally distributed, but Levene’s test for homogeneity of variance was significant for δ15N (F2,330 = 5.50, P = 0.004), and we accordingly used the square roots of δ15N values for analyses of niche overlap.
Snake stable isotope values were obtained from 333 individuals (163 in 2013 and 170 in 2014), which included 116 Nerodia erythrogaster, 106 N. rhombifer and 111 N. sipedon. The general linear model on δ13C values was significant (F23,309 = 14.25, P < 0.0001), with significant differences among species (F2,309 = 103.09, P < 0.0001; Fig. 1) and size classes (F3,309 = 32.19, P < 0.0001), but not between years (F1,309 = 0.09, P = 0.763), between sexes (F1,309 = 0.39, P = 0.535) or among interactions (P ≥ 0.10). Tukey–Kramer multiple-comparison tests showed that in all species, δ13C values increased with SVL and that N. erythrogaster had enriched δ13C values compared to N. rhombifer and N. sipedon; there were no other differences among species. The general linear model for δ15N values was also significant (F23,309 = 16.74, P < 0.0001), with significant differences for species (F2,309 = 31.86, P < 0.0001), sex (F1,309 = 19.98, P < 0.0001) and size classes (F3,309 = 95.36, P < 0.0001) but no differences in δ15N values between years (F1,309 = 0.04, P = 0.843) or interaction effects (P ≥ 0.282). Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison tests revealed several differences among snake groups. First, N. rhombifer had significantly more enriched δ15N values than both N. sipedon and N. erythrogaster, with the latter two having similar δ15N values. Second, female watersnakes (mean δ15N = 7.33‰ ± 0.13) had more enriched δ15N values than males (6.72‰ ± 0.12). Finally, there was no significant difference in δ15N values between snakes in the two largest size classes (> 850 mm and 650–850 mm SVL), but all other size class comparisons showed significant differences, with larger snakes having more enriched δ15N levels (Fig. 2).
Within species, individuals with longer SVL had more enriched δ13C and δ15N values (δ13C: N. erythrogaster F1,114 = 33.28, P < 0.0001; N. rhombifer F1,104 = 48.86, P < 0.0001; N. sipedon F1,109 = 26.98, P < 0.0001) (δ15N: N. erythrogaster F1,114 = 122.93, P < 0.0001; N. rhombifer F1,104 = 113.54, P < 0.0001; N. sipedon F1,109 = 77.64, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 3). The relationship between δ13C values and SVL was similar across species (F2,330 = 0.24 P = 0.790). However, there was a significant interaction between SVL and watersnake species for δ15N values (F2,330 = 3.65, P = 0.027); δ15N values increased significantly more with size for N. sipedon compared to N. erythrogaster (F1,330 = 7.28, P = 0.007) and marginally significantly more than in N. rhombifer (F1,330 = 3.72, P = 0.055). The increasing enrichment of δ15N values with SVL did not differ in N. rhombifer and N. erythrogaster (F1,330 = 0.89, P = 0.347).
Isotopic variances
Isotopic variances differed among and within watersnake species, though not across all possible comparisons. There was no difference in δ13C variance among species (F2,330 = 2.03, P = 0.133; Table 1), but δ15N variance differed among species (F2,330 = 5.50, P = 0.005); Tukey-type multiple comparison tests demonstrated that N. rhombifer had a larger δ15N variance than N. erythrogaster (q = 3.43, q0.05,3 = 3.314, P < 0.05), with no other significant differences among species. Within species, δ13C variance did not differ between sexes in N. erythrogaster (F1,114 = 0.03, P = 0.857) or N. rhombifer (F1,104 = 0.04, P = 0.846), but did to some degree in N. sipedon (F1,109 = 3.67, P = 0.058) with δ13C variance being greater in males. Similarly, sex did not affect δ15N variance in N. erythrogaster (F1,114 = 0.72, P = 0.397) or N. rhombifer (F1,104 = 1.67, P = 0.199) but female N. sipedon had greater δ15N variance (F1,109 = 11.24, P = 0.001) than male N. sipedon.
Isotopic variances differed among some size classes but not others. There was no significant variation in δ13C values among N. sipedon size classes (F1,3 = 1.10, P = 0.371; Fig. 4), but variation decreased with size for N. erythrogaster (F1,5 = 7.46, P = 0.041) and N. rhombifer (F1,6 = 15.94, P = 0.007). The variance of δ15N was not related to size class in N. erythrogaster (F1,5 = 2.07, P = 0.210) but did decrease as N. sipedon size class increased (F1,3 = 29.55, P = 0.012). For N. rhombifer, a quadratic regression between δ15N and size was significant (F2,5 = 6.10, P = 0.046, R2 = 0.71, AIC = 18.14), with a significant linear term (F1,5 = 7.22, P = 0.044) and a quadratic term that approached significance (F1,5 = 4.99, P = 0.076). The linear regression had a higher AIC value (F1,6 = 1.33, P = 0.083, R2 = 0.42, AIC = 21.68) than the quadratic regression.
Mixing model analysis
Mixing model results suggested only slight variation in prey proportions among snake species. Credible intervals (CI) overlapped for all prey groups among the three snake species with one exception: N. erythrogaster fed more on froglet/adult anurans than did N. rhombifer (Fig. 5). Prey proportions were not affected by watersnake sex. However, dietary groups did change with snake size (Fig. 6). For all three watersnake species, estimated proportions of crayfish and tadpole/metamorph anurans in the diet decreased with snake size, while froglet/adult anurans and Lepisosteidae became a larger component of diet as snake size increased; proportions of fish and aquatic salamanders varied little across size classes.
Although individuals from different species but in the same size class tended to eat similar prey, there were several important exceptions. Model estimates suggested that N. rhombifer > 650 mm in SVL tended to feed more on Lepisosteidae than did similarly sized N. erythrogaster, and that the smallest N. erythrogaster (< 450 mm SVL) were predicted to feed significantly more on crayfish than did similarly sized N. rhombifer. N. erythrogaster > 450 mm in SVL fed more on froglet/adult anurans than did N. rhombifer in that size class; N. erythrogaster 650–850 mm in SVL also fed more on froglet/adult anurans than did N. sipedon of the same size class.
Discussion
Our stable isotope analyses revealed complex dietary relationships among sympatric Nerodia erythrogaster, N. rhombifer and N. sipedon. Although all three species may forage on similar prey, we found interspecific differences in their niches, including dissimilar isotopic values, isotopic variances, and proportional estimates of their diets. Within species, sex and size influenced diet; females and larger snakes fed at higher trophic levels and the latter consumed more terrestrial prey. This intraspecific diet variation decreased the number of individuals that shared resources and may reduce interspecific competition and facilitate the coexistence of these three ecologically similar species. While these three similar watersnake species may often coexist (Tucker 1995; Burbrink et al. 1998; Laurent and Kingsbury 2003), their abundance may be affected by habitat use at a variety of spatial scales (Laurent and Kingsbury 2003; Roe et al. 2004; Marshall 2008). Watersnake coexistence and dietary overlap are a complicated system affected by habitat, seasonal food pulses and interspecific interactions (Laurent and Kingsbury 2003; Willson et al. 2010; Durso et al. 2013; Steen et al. 2014) but our results support the idea that observed isotopic and dietary patterns are related to niche partitioning.
Snake species varied in carbon isotopic values in ways that indicate niche partitioning along a terrestrial-aquatic habitat gradient. The enriched δ13C values of N. erythrogaster suggest they use terrestrial habitats more frequently and consume more terrestrial prey than N. rhombifer and N. sipedon (Cloyed and Eason 2017), and mixing models estimated that N. erythrogaster consumed two to four times more froglets and adult frogs than N. rhombifer and N. sipedon. Nerodia erythrogaster may thus reduce interspecific competition with the other two snake species by feeding on terrestrial resources, which may require different foraging strategies (Bilcke et al. 2006; Hutinec and Mebert 2011). Nerodia erythrogaster is more terrestrial than both congenerics (Preston 1970; Laurent and Kingsbury 2003), with large home ranges (~ 16 ha.) that include scattered wetlands in a terrestrial matrix where they feed on a variety of anurans (Roe et al. 2004). Our results corroborate earlier work showing that adult anurans are a major component of N. erythrogaster diets (Mushinsky and Hebrard 1977; Mushinsky et al. 1982), although crayfish, which can use both terrestrial and aquatic habitats, may also form a large part of the diet according to our stable isotope study. Previous studies using gut content analyses found crayfish to be a minor dietary item for all three Nerodia species, in contrast to our results (Gibbons and Dorcas 2004). The depleted δ13C values of N. sipedon and N. rhombifer suggest that both species consume primarily aquatic prey, i.e. tadpoles, crayfish, aquatic salamanders and fishes at our site. Nerodia sipedon typically prey on amphibians and fishes (Lacy 1995; Roe et al. 2004; King et al. 2006) and are found in a large variety of aquatic habitats (Gibbons and Dorcas 2004), but previous studies have found that Nerodia rhombifer is strongly aquatic, a forager in deeper (300 mm), open water and mostly piscivorous (Mushinsky et al. 1982; Plummer and Goy 1984; Savitsky 1989), which is different from this species’ diet at our site, where it fed somewhat evenly across the six prey categories.
In addition to partitioning resources along a habitat gradient, these three species also feed at slightly different trophic levels. Nerodia rhombifer had enriched δ15N values compared to both N. sipedon and N. erythrogaster. Lepisosteidae, other fishes and aquatic salamanders had the most enriched δ15N values among the prey, and mixing model estimates suggested that these 3 prey groups comprised 54% of N. rhombifer’s diet but only 35% of N. sipedon’s diet and 19% for N. erythrogaster. Nerodia sipedon and N. erythrogaster were predicted to eat more crayfish, which occupy a lower trophic level. Nerodia rhombifer therefore fed at higher trophic levels than N. sipedon and N. erythrogaster, and the combination of partitioning both trophic level and habitats results in each species occupying unique niche space.
Within the niche space that each species occupied, individuals varied in how they used that space. Carbon and nitrogen isotopes varied with sex in N. sipedon, which may have important implications for dietary overlap and coexistence with congenerics. Male N. sipedon had marginally wider δ13C variances than females and thus may have fed on a wider range of aquatic and terrestrial prey. Female N. sipedon, in contrast, had a significantly greater range of δ15N values and therefore may have foraged on a wider range of trophic levels. Female N. sipedon are likely to use different habitats, especially when gravid, which could contribute to the observed foraging differences between sexes (Brown and Weatherhead 2000; Pattishall and Cundall 2009; Neuman-Lee et al. 2013). These sex-driven differences in isotopic variance across both isotopes increase this species’ overall diet breadth. Furthermore, the reduction in intraspecific competition caused by sex differences could help explain how this dietary generalist can coexist with the two larger-bodied watersnake species. Male N. sipedon overlap more in diet with N. erythrogaster, as both may consume more terrestrial prey, and female N. sipedon overlap more with N. rhombifer, which consume more fishes from higher trophic levels (Perkins and Eason 2019).
Snake diets changed with size for all three species, and these changes occurred across both habitat and trophic gradients. Snakes incorporated more terrestrial prey in their diets (enriched δ13C) as they grew, suggesting that larger snakes increased their use of terrestrial habitats for foraging or their hunting of adult frogs in the water or along the water’s edge (Rasmussen 2010; Trakimas et al. 2011). The shift towards terrestrial prey in larger snakes was most apparent in N. erythrogaster, as supported by δ13C values becoming enriched as snake size increased, the sharp decrease in δ13C variance in larger size classes, and the mixing model estimates. Nerodia erythrogaster likely fed primarily on crayfish and tadpoles/metamorphs when they were younger and on adult anurans when they were older, thus spanning larger habitat space but a smaller trophic range. Similarly, N. sipedon shifted towards froglets/adult anurans when snakes grew larger than 450 mm SVL, supporting a previous descriptive study (Lacy 1995). The inclusion of adult anurans in larger watersnakes’ diet might be driven by an innate chemical response to these prey, as observed in N. erythrogaster when individuals reach 8 months in age or > 500 mm SVL (Mushinsky and Lotz 1980; Mushinsky et al. 1982). With the widest trophic range, younger, smaller N. rhombifer fed on tadpoles/metamorph anurans at a lower trophic level and shifted to predatory fish from the highest trophic level when watersnakes were older and larger (Altig et al. 2007; Zeug and Winemiller 2008; Fletcher et al. 2015).
Larger watersnakes of all three species foraged at higher trophic levels (enriched δ15N), making a trophic shift, from tadpoles and crayfish to fish, aquatic salamanders, and adult anurans as they grew. This trophic shift was strongest in N. sipedon, which has the broadest diet of any watersnake in North America (Ernst and Ernst 2003; Gibbons and Dorcas 2004). Nerodia rhombifer also shifts from smaller to larger fish as snakes increase in size (Mushinsky et al. 1982; Plummer and Goy 1984), and our work suggests that the largest N. rhombifer increased the amount of Lepisosteidae in their diets, which would increase their trophic position. Similarly, the switch from crayfish to adult anurans in N. erythrogaster accompanies a trophic shift with body size. Furthermore, large N. rhombifer and N. sipedon had little variance in δ15N, suggesting they increasingly consumed resources from the highest trophic levels as they grew. Watersnake prey at these highest trophic levels are likely larger themselves, as body size is positively related to trophic level in many aquatic systems (Arim et al. 2010; Dalponti et al. 2018), and as optimal foraging theory predicts, it is probably more profitable for larger watersnakes to feed on larger prey items that occupy higher trophic levels (Costa et al. 2008).
Snake sex and size interacted to affect isotopic values and ranges. Females, which reach larger sizes than males, did not differ from males in carbon isotope values but fed at higher trophic levels across all three species. Females likely consumed more fishes, including Lepisosteidae, which had the most enriched δ15N values among the prey analyzed in this study. Further, females are larger and have wider gapes that allow them to feed on fishes that are too large for males (Mushinsky et al. 1982; King 1993), and larger fishes might feed at higher trophic levels in our system (Fry et al. 1999; Jennings et al. 2001). Snakes typically drop smaller prey from their diets as they grow (e.g., Arnold 1993; Bowen 2004), and larger females may not eat smaller prey from lower trophic levels while males continue to feed on them. Sexual dimorphism affects dietary variation in many animal taxa (e.g., southern giant petrel, Macronectes giganteus; Forero et al. 2005; grey seal, Halichoerus grypus; Beck et al. 2007; ant-eating spider, Zodarion jozefienae; Pekár et al. 2011), and intersexual ecological differences such as those that can occur in foraging may enforce the evolution of these dimorphisms (Stephens and Wiens 2009; Hendry et al. 2014).
Our study demonstrates how intra- and interspecific variation can interact to affect relationships among evolutionarily and ecologically similar species. Although we did not measure competition directly, our results have potentially important implications for how such species coexist. Intraspecific variation can decrease competition by reducing the number of individuals that overlap in resource use, thus decreasing both intraspecific competition by widening species’ niches as well as interspecific competition by ameliorating the effects of niche overlap, thereby maintaining biological diversity at multiple scales. As demonstrated in our study, generalist species with wide dietary niches, feeding on a variety of resources across trophic levels and habitats, can be the result of intraspecific dietary variation. This may be particularly significant for gape-limited, sexually dimorphic species, predisposing them to ontogenetic and sex-driven intraspecific variation (Shine and Wall 2007). Broadening of dietary niches can result in resource overlap of only certain species subgroups, as was the case in this study, with large male N. sipedon overlapping in diet most with large N. erythrogaster, large female N. sipedon overlapping most with mid-to-large sized N. rhombifer and smaller individuals of N. sipedon and N. rhombifer overlapping more with each other than they do with large conspecifics. Without considering the effects of sex, size, and their interaction on diet in this watersnake community, we would have missed nuanced aspects of how resources are partitioned both among and within species. Our results suggest how a balance between intra- and interspecific variation may evolve among ecologically similar generalist species so as to decrease the overall amount of competition rather than just intra- or interspecific competition. Future studies on resource partitioning and community structure need to consider if and when this balance facilitates coexistence and shapes the evolution and ecology of similar coexisting species.
Data availability
Data from this study are available at Dyrad Digital Depository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2ngf1vhm0
References
Alfaro ME, Arnold SJ (2001) Molecular systematics and evolution of Regina and the thamnophiine snakes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 21:408–423
Altig R, Whiles MR, Taylor CL (2007) What do tadpoles really eat? Assessing the trophic status of an understudied and imperiled group of consumers in freshwater habitats. Freshw Biol 52:386–395
Arim M, Abades SR, Laufer G et al (2010) Food web structure and body size: trophic position and resource acquisition. Oikos 119:147–153
Arnold SJ (1993) Foraging theory and prey-size-predator-size relations in snakes. In: Seigel RA, Collins JT (eds) Snakes: ecology and behavior. The Blackburn Press, Caldwell, pp 87–115
Bearhop S, Adams CE, Waldron S et al (2004) Determining trophic niche width: a novel approach using stable isotope analysis. J Anim Ecol 73:1007–1012
Bearhop S, Phillips RA, McGill R et al (2006) Stable isotopes indicate sex-specific and long-term individual foraging specialisation in diving seabirds. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 311:157–164
Beaulieu M, Sockman KW (2012) One meadow for two sparrows: resource partitioning in a high elevation habitat. Oecologia 170:529–540
Beck CA, Iverson SJ, Bowen WD, Blanchard W (2007) Sex differences in grey seal diet reflect seasonal variation in foraging behaviour and reproductive expenditure: evidence from quantitative fatty acid signature analysis. J Anim Ecol 76:490–502
Bilcke J, Herrel A, Van Damme R (2006) Correlated evolution of aquatic prey-capture strategies in European and American natricine snakes. Biol J Linn Soc 88:73–83
Bolnick DI, Svanbäck R, Fordyce JA et al (2003) The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am Nat 161:1–28
Bolnick DI, Svanbäck R, Araújo MS, Persson L (2007) Comparative support for the niche variation hypothesis that more generalized populations also are more heterogeneous. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:10075–10079
Bowen KD (2004) Geographic and size-related variation in the diet of insular populations of the northern watersnake. Am Midl Nat 152:418–424
Broekhuis F, Thuo D, Hayward MW (2018) Feeding ecology of cheetahs in the Massai Mara, Kenya and the potential for intra- and interspecific competition. J Zool 304:65–72
Brown GP, Weatherhead PJ (2000) Thermal ecology and sexual size dimorphism in northern watersnakes, Nerodia sipedon. Ecol Monogr 70:311–330
Burbrink FT, Phillips CA, Heske EJ (1998) A riparian zone in southern Illinois as a potential dispersal corridor for reptiles and amphibians. Biol Conserv 86:107–115
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Canavero A, Hernández D, Zarucki M, Arim M (2014) Patterns of co-occurrences in a killifish metacommunity are more related with body size than with species identity. Austral Ecol 39:455–461
Cherel Y, Fontaine C, Richard P, Labat J-P (2010) Isotopic niches and trophic levels of myctophid fishes and their predators in the Southern Ocean. Limnol Oceanogr 55:324–332
Cloyed CS, Eason PK (2016) Different ecological conditions support individual specialization in closely related, ecologically similar species. Evol Ecol 30:379–400
Cloyed CS, Eason PK (2017) Niche partitioning and the role of intraspecific niche variation in structuring a guild of generalist anurans. R Soc Open Sci 4:170060
Costa GC, Vitt LJ, Pianka ER et al (2008) Optimal foraging constrains macroecological patterns: body size and dietary niche breadth in lizards. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:670–677
Costa-Pereira R, Araújo MS, Souza FL, Ingram T (2019) Competition and resource breadth shape niche variation and overlap in multiple trophic dimensions. Proc R Soc B 286:20190369
Dalponti G, Guariento RD, Caliman A (2018) Hunting high or low: body size drives trophic position among and within marine predators. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 597:39–46
Dayan T, Simberloff D (2005) Ecological and community-wide character displacement: the next generation. Ecol Lett 8:875–894
Durso AM, Willson JD, Winne CT (2013) Habitat influences diet overlap in aquatic snake assemblages. J Zool 291:185–193
Egan JP, Gibbs S, Simons AM (2018) Trophic niches through ontogeny in 12 species of Indo-Pacific marine Clupeoidei (herrings, sardines, and anchovies). Mar Biol 165:153
Ernst CH, Ernst EM (2003) Snakes of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington
Falke LP, Henderson JS, Novak M, Preston DL (2020) Temporal shifts in intraspecific and interspecific diet variation among 3 stream predators. Freshw Sci 39:115–125
Fink P, Reichwaldt ES, Harrod C, Rossberg AG (2012) Determining trophic niche width: an experimental test of the stable isotope approach. Oikos 121:1985–1994
Fitzgerald LA (2012) Finding and capturing reptiles. In: McDiarmid RW, Foster MS, Guyer C et al (eds) Reptile biodiversity: standard methods for inventory and monitoring. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 77–88
Fletcher DE, Lindell AH, Stillings GK et al (2015) Trophic variation in coastal plain stream predatory fishes. Southeast Nat 14:373–396
Forero MG, González-Solís J, Hobson KA et al (2005) Stable isotopes reveal trophic segregation by sex and age in the southern giant petrel in two different food webs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 296:107–113
Fry B, Mumford PL, Tam F et al (1999) Trophic position and individual feeding histories of fish from Lake Okeechobee, Florida. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:590–600
Gause GF (1934) Experimental analysis of Vito Volterra’s mathematical theory of the struggle for existence. Science 79:16–17
Gibbons JW, Andrews KM (2004) PIT tagging: simple technology at its best. BioScience 54:447–454
Gibbons JW, Dorcas ME (2004) North American watersnakes: a natural history. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman
Gittleman JL, Van Valkenburgh BV (1997) Sexual dimorphism in the canines and skulls of carnivores: effects of size, phylogeny, and behavioural ecology. J Zool 242:97–117
Hadi S, Ziegler T, Waltert M et al (2012) Habitat use of trophic niche overlap of two sympatric Colobines, Presbytis potenziani and Simias concolor, on Siberut Island, Indonesia. Int J Primatol 33:218–232
Hardin G (1960) The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131:1292–1297
Hendry CR, Guiher TJ, Pyron RA (2014) Ecological divergence and sexual selection drive sexual size dimorphism in new world pitvipers (Serpentes: Viperidae). J Evol Biol 27:760–771
Himes JG (2003) Intra- and interspecific competition among the water snakes, Nerodia sipedon and Nerodia rhombifer. J Herpetol 37:126–131
Hollows JW, Townsend CR, Collier KJ (2002) Diet of the crayfish Paranephrops zealandicus in bush and pasture streams: insights from stable isotopes and stomach analysis. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 36:129–142
Hubert WA, Pope KL, Dettmers JM (2012) Passive capture techniques. In: Zale AV, Parrish DL, Sutton TM (eds) Fisheries techniques, 3rd edn. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 223–265
Hutchinson GE (1959) Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals? Am Nat 93:145–159
Hutchinson GE (1961) The paradox of the plankton. Am Nat 95:137–145
Hutinec BJ, Mebert K (2011) Ecological partitioning between dice Snakes (Natrix tessallata) and grass snakes (Natrix natrix) in Southern Croatia. Mertensiella 18:225–233
Jennings S, Pinnegar JK, Polunin NVC, Boon TW (2001) Weak cross-species relationships between body size and trophic level belie powerful size-based trophic structuring in fish communities. J Anim Ecol 70:934–944
King RB (1993) Microgeographic, historical, and size-correlated variation in water snake diet composition. J Herpetol 27:90–94
King RB, Ray JM, Stanford KM (2006) Gorging on gobies: beneficial effects of alien prey on a threatened vertebrate. Can J Zool 84:108–115
Kliemann BCK, Baldasso MC, Pini SFR et al (2019) Assessing the diet and trophic niche breadth of an omnivorous fish (Glanidium ribeiroi) in subtropical lotic environments: intraspecific and ontogenic responses to spatial variations. Mar Freshw Res 70:1116–1128
Kofron CP (1978) Food and habitats of aquatic snakes (Reptilia, Serpentes) in a Louisiana swamp. J Herpetol 12:543–554
Lacy GB (1995) Food habits of the midland water snake, Nerodia sipedon pleuralis in a Piedmont creek, with comments on its population structure. Master thesis, Georgia College
Langeland A, L’Abée-Lund JH, Jonsson B, Jonsson N (1991) Resource partitioning and niche shift in Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus and brown trout Salmo trutta. J Anim Ecol 60:895–912
Lasky JR, Yang J, Zhang G et al (2014) The role of functional traits and individual variation in the co-occurrence of Ficus species. Ecology 95:978–990
Laurent EJ, Kingsbury BA (2003) Habitat separation among three species of water snakes in northwestern Kentucky. J Herpetol 37:229–235
Lichstein JW, Dushoff J, Levin SA, Pacala SW (2007) Intraspecific variation and species coexistence. Am Nat 170:807–818
Lürig MD, Best RJ, Stachowicz JJ (2016) Microhabitat partitioning in seagrass mesograzers is driven by consistent species choices across multiple predator and competitor contexts. Oikos 125:1324–1333
MacArthur RH (1958) Population ecology of some warblers of northeastern coniferous forests. Ecology 39:599–619
MacArthur R, Levins R (1967) The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Am Nat 101:377–385
Marshall JC Jr (2008) Population genetics and landscape modeling in water snakes. Dissertation. Purdue University
Mata VA, Amorim F, Corley MFV et al (2016) Female dietary bias towards large migratory moths in the European free-tailed bat (Tadarida teniotis). Biol Lett 12:20150988
McDiarmid RW, Altig R (1999) Tadpoles: the biology of anuran larvae. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
McVay JD, Flores-Villela O, Carstens B (2015) Diversification of North American natricine snakes. Biol J Linn Soc 116:1–12
Milanovich JR, Maerz JC (2012) Assessing the use of non-lethal tail clips for measuring stable isotopes of plethodontid salamanders. Herpetol Conserv Biol 7:67–74
Mushinsky HR, Hebrard JJ (1977) Food partitioning by five species of water snakes in Louisiana. Herpetologica 33:162–166
Mushinsky HR, Lotz KH (1980) Chemoreceptive responses of two sympatric water snakes to to extracts of commonly ingested prey species. J Chem Ecol 6:523–535
Mushinsky HR, Hebrard JJ, Vodopich DS (1982) Ontogeny of water snake foraging ecology. Ecology 63:1624–1629
Nakazawa T (2015) Ontogenetic niche shifts matter in community ecology: a review and future perspectives. Popul Ecol 57:347–354
Neuman-Lee LA, Durso AM, Kiriazis NM et al (2013) Differential habitat use by common watersnakes (Nerodia sipedon). IRCF Reptil Amphib 20:166–171
Olson MH (1996) Ontogenetic niche shifts in largemouth bass: variability and consequences for first-year growth. Ecology 77:179–190
Parnell AC, Inger R, Bearhop S, Jackson AL (2010) Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too much variation. PLoS ONE 5:e9672
Pattishall A, Cundall D (2009) Habitat use by synurbic watersnakes (Nerodia sipedon). Herpetologica 65:183–198
Pekár S, Martišová M, Bilde T (2011) Intersexual trophic niche partitioning in an ant-eating spider (Araneae: Zodariidae). PLoS ONE 6:e14603
Perkins MW, Eason PK (2019) The relationship of head morphology and diet among three sympatric watersnake species. Amphibia-Reptilia 40:65–77
Pianka ER (1973) The structure of lizard communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:53–74
Pianka ER (1975) Niche relations of desert lizards. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. The Belknap Press of Harvard University, Cambridge, pp 292–314
Plummer MV, Ferner JW (2012) Marking reptiles. In: McDiarmid W, Foster MS, Guyer C et al (eds) Reptile biodiversity: standard methods for inventory and monitoring. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 143–150
Plummer MV, Goy JM (1984) Ontogenetic dietary shift of water snakes (Nerodia rhombifera) in a fish hatchery. Copeia 2:550–552
Preston WB (1970) The comparative ecology of two water snakes, Natrix rhombifera and Natrix erythrogaster in Oklahoma. Dissertation, University of Oklahoma
Rasmussen JB (2010) Estimating terrestrial contribution to stream invertebrates and periphyton using a gradient-based mixing model for δ13C. J Anim Ecol 79:393–402
Roe JH, Kingsbury BA, Herbert NR (2004) Comparative water snake ecology: conservation of mobile animals that use temporally dynamic resources. Biol Conserv 118:79–89
Roughgarden J (1976) Resource partitioning among competing species—a coevolutionary approach. Theor Popul Biol 9:388–424
Rudolf VHW, Rasmussen NL (2013) Ontogenetic functional diversity: size structure of a keystone predator drives functioning of a complex ecosystem. Ecology 94:1046–1056
Sabatés A, Saiz E (2000) Intra- and interspecific variability in prey size and niche breadth of myctophiform fish larvae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 201:261–271
Samplonius JM, Kappers EF, Brands S, Both C (2016) Phenological mismatch and ontogenetic diet shifts interactively affect offspring condition in a passerine. J Anim Ecol 85:1255–1264
Sanderson BL, Tran CD, Coe HJ et al (2009) Nonlethal sampling of fish caudal fins yields valuable stable isotope data for threatened and endangered fishes. Trans Am Fish Soc 138:1166–1177
SAS Institute (2000) SAS. Version 9.0. SAS Institute, Cary
Savitsky BAC (1989) Aquatic foraging in two independently evolved species of snake: Nerodia rhombifera (Colubridae) and Agkistrodon piscivorus (Viperidae). Dissertation, The University of Tennessee
Schoener TW (1968) The Anolis lizards of Bimini: resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology 49:704–726
Schoener TW (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185:27–39
Seminoff JA, Jones TT, Eguchi T et al (2006) Stable isotope discrimination (δ13C and δ15N) between soft tissues of the green sea turtle Chelonia mydas and its diet. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 308:271–278
Sheppard CE, Inger R, McDonald RA et al (2018) Intragroup competition predicts individual foraging specialisation in a group-living mammal. Ecol Lett 21:665–673
Shine R, Wall M (2007) Why is intraspecific niche partitioning more common in snakes than in lizards. In: Reilly SM, McBayer LD, Miles DB (eds) Lizard ecology: the evolutionary consequences of foraging mode. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 173–208
Steen DA, McClure CJW, Brock JC et al (2014) Snake co-occurrence patterns are best explained by habitat and hypothesized effects of interspecific interactions. J Anim Ecol 83:286–295
Stephens PR, Wiens JJ (2009) Evolution of sexual size dimorphisms in emydid turtles: ecological dimorphism, Rensch’s rule, and sympatric divergence. Evolution 63:910–925
Svanbäck R, Bolnick DI (2005) Intraspecific competition affects the strength of individual specialization: an optimal diet theory method. Evol Ecol Res 7:993–1012
Trakimas G, Jardine TD, Barisevičiūtė R et al (2011) Ontogenetic dietary shifts in European common frog (Rana temporaria) revealed by stable isotopes. Hydrobiologia 675:87–95
Tronquart NH, Mazeas L, Reuilly-Manenti L et al (2012) Fish fins as non-lethal surrogates for muscle tissues in freshwater food web studies using stable isotopes. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 26:1603–1608
Tucker JK (1995) Notes on road-killed snakes and their implications on habitat modification due to summer flooding on the Mississippi River in west central Illinois. Trans IL State Acad Sci 88:61–71
van Beest FM, McLoughlin PD, Vander Wal E, Brook RK (2014) Density-dependent habitat selection and partitioning between two sympatric ungulates. Oecologia 175:1155–1165
Vassilieva AB, Sinev AY, Tiunov AV (2017) Trophic segregation of anuran larvae in two temporary tropical ponds in southern Vietnam. Herpetol J 27:217–229
Voigt CC, Krofel M, Menges V et al (2018) Sex-specific dietary specialization in a terrestrial apex predator, the leopard, revealed by stable isotope analysis. J Zool 306:1–7
Willson JD, Winne CT, Pilgrim MA et al (2010) Seasonal variation in terrestrial resource subsidies influences trophic niche width and overlap in two aquatic snake species: a stable isotope approach. Oikos 119:1161–1171
Woo KJ, Elliott KH, Davidson M et al (2008) Individual specialization in diet by a generalist marine predator reflects specialization in foraging behaviour. J Anim Ecol 77:1082–1091
Zalewski A (2007) Does size dimorphism reduce competition between sexes? The diet of male male and female pine martens at local and wider geographical scales. Acta Theriol 52:237–250
Zeug SC, Winemiller KO (2008) Evidence supporting the importance of terrestrial carbon in a large-river food web. Ecol 89:1733–1743
Acknowledgements
We thank Jenny Perkins for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. We thank L. Beard, J. Martin, B. Newton, J. Guinto, E. Clark, M. Alschbach, D. Perkins, I. Perkins, R. Perkins, J. Perkins and Z. Humphrey for assistance in field data collection. We thank Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources for research site access. This research was funded by University of Louisville, Watershed Studies Institute (Murray State University), Greater Cincinnati Herpetological Society, Chicago Herpetological Society, Kentucky Society of Natural History and The Kentucky Chapter of The Wildlife Society. This work conforms to the legal requirements in the U.S.A., and we obtained all necessary permits. We followed all University of Louisville Institutional Animal Care Use Committee guidelines (Protocol: #13037).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perkins, M.W., Cloyed, C.S. & Eason, P.K. Intraspecific dietary variation in niche partitioning within a community of ecologically similar snakes. Evol Ecol 34, 1017–1035 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-020-10078-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-020-10078-6