Abstract
Lactoferricin (Lfcin), a multifunction short peptide with a length of 25 residues, is derived from the whey protein lactoferrin by acidic pepsin hydrolysis. It has potent nutritional enhancement, antimicrobial, anticancer, antiviral, antiparasitic, and anti-inflammatory activities. This review describes the research advantages of the above biological functions, with attention to the molecular design and modification of Lfcin. In this examination of design and modification studies, research on the identification of Lfcin active derivatives and crucial amino acid residues is also reviewed. Many strategies for Lfcin optimization have been studied in recent decades, but we mainly introduce chemical modification, cyclization, chimera and polymerization of this peptide. Modifications such as incorporation of d-amino acids, acetylation and/or amidation could effectively improve the activity and stability of these compounds. Due to their wide array of bio-functions and applications, Lfcins have great potential to be developed as biological agents with multiple functions involved with nutritional enhancement, as well as disease preventive and therapeutic effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Lactoferrin (Lf), a nonheme iron-binding glycoprotein, is secreted by the epithelial cells of the mammalian mucosa. It exists in exocrine secretions including tears, saliva, sweat (Park et al. 2011), vaginal fluids (Masson et al. 1968), semen, nasal fluids, bile, urine, bronchial secretions (Masson et al. 1965), gastrointestinal fluids, milk and colostrum. The content of Lf in human colostrum (6–8 mg/mL) and breast milk (2–4 mg/mL), which helps to regulate iron absorption and protect the newborn against gastrointestinal infections (Brock 1980), is much higher than the amount in other body fluids and in fluids of other mammals (Lonnerdal and Iyer 1995). In addition, Lf released from neutrophils plays a determinant role in immune and inflammatory responses (Van Snick et al. 1974). As we know, Lf has been reported in many various physiological functions such as antimicrobial, antiviral, antiparasitic (Leboffe 2009), anticancer, antioxidant (Burrow et al. 2011) and anti-allergic (Kruzel et al. 2006) activities, in addition to the abovementioned iron absorption and other nutritional functions (Brock 1980). Therefore, it has attracted the focus of intensive research for many years mainly due to the strong safety guarantee of this protein from mammary animals.
Lactoferricin (Lfcin) is located in the N-terminal lobe of Lf and is released from the polypeptide chain by pepsin hydrolysis (Bellamy et al. 1992). It is supposed that Lfcins contribute to the normal physiological functions of Lf in vivo and in vitro (Sinha et al. 2013). Particularly, it has a potent antimicrobial activity. Lfcin is highly basic, containing many positively charged Arg and Lys residues. Trp residues in the sequence are important for its antimicrobial activity (Strøm et al. 2002). Lf molecules are highly conserved with homologous structures in various species but release different Lfcins with various lengths, and they exhibit different antimicrobial activities. The two Lfcins studied most extensively are from the native bovine Lf (LfcinB) and human Lf (LfcinH). LfcinB is composed of 25 residues, which form a somewhat distorted antiparallel β-sheet by an intra-molecular disulfide bond (Bellamy et al. 1992). LfcinH consists of the 49 N-terminal residues of Lf including the two pairs of disulfide bonds, and it exhibits a helical conformation instead of the β-sheet structure (Hunter et al. 2005), despite that both LfcinH and LfcinB share an amphipathic α-helical structure. Interestingly, LfcinB was more effective at killing bacterial and fungal organisms when compared with LfcinH in vitro. This difference could be explained in terms of the hydrophobicity, cationicity, secondary structure, amino acid composition and disulfide bonds of the proteins (Fjell et al. 2011). Thus, changing these properties is a common and effective tool to improve the antimicrobial activity of Lfcins. Generally, as nutritional, preventive and therapeutic agents, the stability, cytotoxicity, multidrug resistance and adsorption of Lfcins in vivo should be paid high attention. However, the basic safety baseline and support of lactoferricins and their derivatives from native milk proteins in mammary glands encouraged us to better track their properties for wider applications in the health of animals and humans. Therefore, many modifications such as unnatural amino acid substitutions, cyclization, multimerization and chimera have been studied. Next, we will briefly review study cases and progress of the above modifications.
Biological function of Lfcins
Native Lf plays a role in the host defense against microbial infectious diseases in addition to iron transfer and other nutritional functions (Brock 1980). Lfcins, as a part of Lf, are released by proteolysis enzymes. It is known that Lfcins have the better antimicrobial activities than their parent Lf forms (Arias et al. 2014; Yamauchi et al. 1993). Both LfcinB and LfcinH showed antibacterial activity toward a wide variety of Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria and fungi, but LfcinB exhibited more bactericidal activity while LfcinH showed bacteriostatic activity (Gifford et al. 2005). Moreover, LfcinB is considered as the most effective among the Lfcins from many species including cows, mice and goats (Vorland et al. 1998). When a host is infected with bacteria, a series of toxic substances are released such as exotoxin and unmethylated CpG-containing oligonucleotides, inducing an immune response (Krieg et al. 1995). Lfcins can regulate the secretion of inflammatory factors to neutralize these toxins, indicating an immunomodulatory function (Mattsbybaltzer et al. 1996; Shinoda et al. 1996).
In addition, Lfcins exert antiviral activity against human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) (Andersen et al. 2001), herpes simplex virus (HSV) (Andersen et al. 2003), human papilloma virus (HPV) (Mistry et al. 2007), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (Berkhout et al. 2002). The parent protein Lf possesses a much higher antiviral activity than do Lfcins in vitro; however, Shestakov et al. (2012) reported that Lfcin instead of Lf could block viruses in mice, indicating its role as a potent antiviral agent in vivo. Lfcins are highly positively charged peptides, an attribute which is critical to the affinity of heparan sulfate (HS, highly negatively charged) which blocks the initial viral entry, thus inhibiting cell-to-cell spreading of an ongoing infection (Andersen et al. 2001; Jenssen et al. 2008). In addition, structural features such as hydrophobicity, molecular size, and the secondary structure seem to be related to the antiviral activity (Jenssen et al. 2004). Binding with the viral cell membrane as a part of the antiviral mechanisms, Lfcins can also directly interact with the virus or interfere with viral trafficking, consequently delaying coat protein synthesis and viral replication (Marr et al. 2009).
In regard to antitumor activities, Lfcins have been found to exert very potent antitumor effects on various cancer cell lines. LfcinB can induce human monocyte leukemia cell (THP-1) apoptosis by the production of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and activation of Ca2+/Mg2+-dependent endonucleases in the early stage (20 min) (Yoo et al. 1997a). Lfcins also act against gastric cancer cells and human colorectal cancer cells, with both of these types being the most common causes of cancer death in the world (Jiang and Lönnerdal 2017; Pan et al. 2013). Lfcins target the tumor cell membranous phosphatidylserine, performing highly selective cytotoxicity against tumor cells by activating diverse signaling pathways and preventing their metabolism, eventually inducing cell apoptosis (Khan and Taneja 2015; Pan et al. 2013; Riedl et al. 2011). When tested in vivo, iron-free bovine lactoferrin (LfB) significantly suppressed tumor growth and metastasis, indicating that multifunctional LfB and LfcinB may act in host defense (Yoo et al. 1997b). The applications of Lfcins in many aspects such as nutritional supplementation, immunomodulation, antimicrobial activity, antiviral activity, antiparasitic activity, and antitumor activity are summarized in Table 1. However, the research and development of antimicrobial Lfcins as therapeutic agents for animals and humans through modification will be focused on in this review.
Design and modification of Lfcins
The therapeutic and healthy application of peptides in animals and humans usually suffers from problems such as cell toxicity, poor stability, high cost, and low selectivity. Based on the active sites and sequences, key bonds and amino acids of Lfcin, many molecular design strategies have been employed in order to optimize the antimicrobial activity and selectivity and develop novel functions of the peptide, including modifications through insertion of large hydrophobic side-chains, d-amino acid substitution, methylation, acetalization, amidation, cyclization, and chimera and polymerization of the peptide, as well as their cross utilization and combination.
Active site of Lfcins
The amino acid composition of Lfcin derived from different mammalian species is found in the 17–41 amino acid sequence of the N-terminal of Lf with a high homology, and most Lfcins contain the structure characteristic of bacteriostasis. The activities of Lfcins from different species such as cows, mice and goats shows that LfcinB is a potent candidate for development of new antimicrobial agents (Bruni et al. 2016). Many studies of the amino acid sequences and residues have revealed the active center and important residues of Lfcin. The function and structural features of the active sequences are studied and compared in detail.
Using truncation, shorter derived sequences were designed. Furthermore, it was found that most of these truncated sequences retained biological effects. The 11-residue peptide LfcinB20–30 was essential for bacterial membrane interaction and played an important role in antimicrobial activity with low hemolytic activity (Kang et al. 1996). The shorter versions of LfcinB containing amino acids 17–31 (LfcinB17–31) and 17–27 (LfcinB17-27) from the N-terminal of Lf were found to have a slightly lower antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli than did LfcinB17–41 (Rekdal et al. 1999; Strøm et al. 2002; Liu et al. 2011). Later, the sequence RRWQWR (LfcinB20–25) was identified as being the antimicrobial center of LfcinB (Tomita et al. 1994; Schibli et al. 1999). Peptides LfcinH21–36, corresponding to the loop region of the N-terminal of LfcinH (FQWQRNMRKVRGPPVS), and LfcinH21–31, corresponding to its charged portion, exerted significant antibacterial effects against E. coli (Odell et al. 1996). It was later found that the multiple antigen peptides (MAP) of LfcinH21–31 exerted significant antibacterial effects against a broad spectrum of bacteria including methicillin-resistant S. aureus, and the 11-residue peptide (FQWQRNMRKVR) at the N-terminal of LfcinH was thought to account for all of the activity of the larger peptides (Azuma et al. 1999). Truncated sequence from LfcinH14–31, the residue fragment LfcinH19–31 was identified as the optimal length for antimicrobial activity. It was noted that LfcinH19–31 could bind to lipid A/lipopolysaccharide, as shown by neutralizing endotoxic activity in a Limulus assay (Håversen et al. 2010). Therefore, these sequences are intensively studied due to their activity against different targets.
A series of experiments examining each of the residues in LfcinB17–31 were performed to identify the specific amino acids that were important for the antibacterial activity. The result showed that neither of the two Trp residues at positions 6 and 8 in the LfcinB17–31 derivatives could be replaced by Ala without a severe loss of antibacterial activity (Strøm et al. 2000). This “Trp-effect” was further explored in the derivatives of LfcinB17–31 wherein one, two or three residues in the native sequence were replaced by Trp. A higher antibacterial activity was found with the Trp-rich LfcinB17–31 (Strøm et al. 2002). The same result was indicated with porcine lactoferricin (LFP-20), in which the antibacterial activity increased with an increasing content of Trp (Han et al. 2013). Another crucial amino acid is Arg. In the peptide LfcinB20–30, using lysine to replace Arg or using Gln to replace all Arg and Lys residues resulted in a decrease of the antibacterial activity. However, using Arg to replace Lys rendered stronger activity in this peptide (Kang et al. 1996). Similarly, when all Arg residues in the LfcinB17–30 and LfcinH1–11 were replaced by Lys, the activity of all-K variants against mycobacterial infections was significantly lower than that of the corresponding original peptide (Silva et al. 2014). Hence, the peptide, which is rich in Arg and Trp, is often used as a good original master/sequence for the design of novel antimicrobial peptides. Amino acid substitutions affect the function and activity of peptides in essence by altering the number of positive net charges, the ratio of hydrophilic and hydrophobic amino acids, and the size of amino acid side chains.
Chemical modification of Lfcins
To determine how Trp is pivotal for the biological activity of LfcinB17–31, peptides wherein Trp was replaced by Bal, termed 1-Nal and 2-Nal, with different properties were prepared and tested for antibacterial activity against S. aureus and E. coli. The derivatives containing aromatic hydrocarbon residues had higher antibacterial activities. It was shown that neither the hydrogen bonding ability nor the amphipathicity of Trp were essential properties for the antimicrobial effect. However, the results indicated that the shape, size and aromatic properties of Trp seem to be the most important features for the biological activity (Haug and Svendsen 2001). In a further study, Trp residues in LfcinB17–31 were replaced with the bulky aromatic amino acids Phe, Tbt, Ath, Dip and Bip to elucidate and confirm the importance of size and shape. The largest aromatic amino acids employed resulted in the most active peptides. The bacterial selectivity could be altered to some degree by utilizing aromatic residue substitution (Haug et al. 2001; Strøm et al. 2002). The presence of the bulky group on the side chain enabled the peptides to more effectively interact with the membrane.
Using unnatural amino acids such as d-amino acids is a common way to increase the stability and prolong the duration of action of peptides and protect them from digestion in vivo. d-amino acid-based derivatives of the sequence RRWQWRMKK in LfcinB resulted in higher antimicrobial activities against bacteria than those observed with other LfcinB (Wakabayashi et al. 1999). Comparing with the bactericidal effects of LfcinB17–31 and its all-d-amino acid counterpart against E. coli and S. aureus, d-LfcinB17–31 showed a significantly better efficacy (Ulvatne and Vorland 2001). Similarly, d-LfcinB17–30 displayed the highest antimycobacterial activity among Lfcin-based peptides (Silva et al. 2014).
In many cases, N-terminus acetylation and/or C-terminus amidation are ways to improve the activity of peptides. Based on the sequence of LFcinB20–28, N-acylated derivative peptides having a carbon-chain length of six to eleven carbons showed similar or higher antimicrobial activities compared with those of LfcinB (Wakabayashi et al. 1999). A series of mutant sequences were designed based on LfcinH21–31, which included strengthening of the hydrophobic N-terminal end by adding N-acylation in the derivative peptides and resulted in an enhanced antimicrobial activity against E. coli. These N-acylated peptides perturbed the lateral packing of neutral lipids and exhibited better permeability into E. coli lipid vesicles (Zweytick et al. 2011). Further study revealed that the N-acylated peptides perturb the organization of cardiolipin and phosphatidylethanolamine in cell membranes and induce defects in E. coli cell division (Zweytick et al. 2014). LfcinB20–25 led to an 8-fold decrease of the MIC against E. coli and S. aureus due to the C-terminal amidation (Tomita et al. 1994). Another example showed that C-terminal amidation improved LfcinB20–25 antibacterial activity. In terms of proteolytic stability, protection through amidation at the C-terminal had a slightly lesser effect. However, N-terminal acetylation decreased antimicrobial activity but conferred notable resistance against serum aminopeptidases. Meanwhile, the combination of the two modifications produced even greater antibacterial activity and stronger proteolytic stability of the peptide (Nguyen et al. 2010).
It was reported that methylation alone in C0-RRWQ[1-Me-W]R-NH2 resulted in a 3 to 4-fold increase in antimicrobial activity against E. coli (Greathouse et al. 2008). Later, a heptapeptide produced with 2 methylated Trp residues (RRMeWQMeWRR-NH2; MeTrp-LfB7) exhibited enhanced activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. To determine whether Trp methylation was essential for the increase of efficacy, the peptide was synthesized and characterized without methylated Trp (LfB7: RRWQWRR-NH2). Meanwhile, two peptides (LfB7-MeTrp3,5 Ala4: RRMeWAMeWRR-NH2 and LfB7-Ala4: RRWAWRR-NH2) in which Gln was replaced by Ala were also prepared. Results indicated that LfB7-Ala4 has a 5-fold reduced activity against E. coli, while LfB7MeTrp3,5 exhibited the highest activity, with a 4- and 6-fold increase compared to LfB7 against E. coli and S. aureus, respectively (Kim and Greathouse 2016).
Cyclization of Lfcins
Cyclization (backbone cyclization or disulfide-bridged cyclization) of peptides has been used successfully in some cases as a viable strategy to improve antimicrobial activity while maintaining the structural stability of the peptides. To cyclize LfcinB20–30 chemically, Nguyen et al. added cysteine residues to each terminal end of the peptide to form a disulfide bond. The cyclic peptide was found to have stronger antimicrobial potency against both E. coli and S. aureus than its linear counterpart and to be embedded deeper into the membrane (Nguyen et al. 2005). The RW-rich hexapeptides RRWWRF (Lfcin-RW) were derived from screening of a synthetic combinatorial library (Blondelle et al. 1995), and many studies have shown that the backbone-cyclization of Lfcin-RW has a pronounced activity-improving and bacterial selectivity-enhancing effect (Wessolowski et al. 2004; Dathe et al. 2004; Appelt et al. 2005). The hexameric peptides LfcinB6 and Lfcin-RW were cyclized by both head-to-tail linking and disulfide crosslinking of the peptide backbone for comparison. The two cyclic hexapeptides were found to be highly effective in both antimicrobial activity and serum stability. However, the two cyclization methods produced different effects—disulfide-bond cyclization was clearly more advantageous for antimicrobial activity while backbone cyclization resulted in more proteolytically stable peptides. However, the benefit of backbone cyclization did not extend to the longer LfcinB11 (Nguyen et al. 2010).
In recent years, along with the combination of chemistry and biology, olefin ring-closing metathesis reactions and click chemistry reactions have been applied to the cyclization of antimicrobial peptides and to the design of peptide-based drugs to various degrees. LfcinB-CLICK was generated using “click chemistry” (a CuI-promoted alkyne/azide cycloaddition reaction) in order to replace the disulfide bridge with a triazole linkage that allowed the peptide to retain the cyclic hairpin characteristics of the original peptide, LfcinB. The LfcinB-CLICK peptide inhibited the growth of E. coli, and there was no difference in antimicrobial activity when compared with the original peptide. Furthermore, the antimicrobial mechanism indicated that LfcinB-CLICK exhibited aggregation of vesicles and permeabilization into E. coli (Arias et al. 2014). Similar results had been reported from the comparison of LfcinB-CLICK to LfcinB indicating an improved anticancer activity (Arias et al. 2016). Another interesting modification method relies on the use of the S. aureus enzyme sortase A. Arias et al. showed that the use of sortase A provided an alternative way to form cyclic LFcinB, preserving the antimicrobial activity of the original peptide by inducing vesicle aggregation and permeabilization into the inner membrane of E. coli (Arias et al. 2014).
Chimera of Lfcins
To test whether two Lf-derivative peptides together can form a new functional unit, a chimeric construct (LFchimera) was designed by linking the two peptides into one molecule. The short peptide LfcinH1–11, corresponding to amino acids 1–11 of LfcinH at the N-end, can act as a cell penetrating peptide (CPP). LfcinB20–25 produces cytotoxic activities towards cancer cells. Therefore, two new chimera peptides were created by combining LfcinH1–11 and LfcinB20–25 through either a Pro or Gly–Gly linker. The results supported that the new adducts exhibited interesting anticancer activities with considerable special selectivity for cancerous cells (Arias et al. 2016).
Lactoferrampin (Lfampin) was discovered by a Dutch work group in 2004. LfampinB, encompassing the sequence of amino acids 265–284 in the N1-terminal of bovine Lf, was found to exert potent antibacterial and antifungal effects (van der Kraan et al. 2004). The same region of human lactoferrin had no detectable antibacterial activity, but it could be mutated to increase its potency (Haney et al. 2009). Recent studies illustrated that this chimeric structure containing LfcinB17–30 and LfampinB265–284 exerted stronger antimicrobial effects than those of the constituent peptides, and it has been used in various animal-model tests. Previous reports concerning LFchimera (LfampinB265–284-K-LfcinB17–30) showed not only bactericidal activity towards both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria but also absence of the sensitivity to ionic strength (Bolscher et al. 2009). LFchimera (LfcinB17–30-K-LfampinB265–284) was very potent agent against Burkholderia pseudomallei (Puknun et al. 2013) and showed better therapeutic effects against enterohaemorrhagic E. coli O157:H7 in a mouse model (Flores-Villaseñor et al. 2012).
Polymerization of Lfcins
It has been shown that the polymerization of Lfcin is of notable significance to structural stability and transmembrane characteristics (Johnson et al. 1995; Lemmon et al. 1992). A tetrameric peptide, LfcinB (20–25)4 (Fig. 1), based on the core sequence RRWQWR of bovine lactoferricin, exhibited selective inhibition of oral squamous-cell carcinoma (OSCC) at low doses but no lytic effect in normal red blood cells. This peptide induced a higher degree of tumor apoptosis, higher levels of IgG antibodies, and a lower inflammatory response relative to its monomer LfcinB (20–25) (Solarte et al. 2015, 2017). In addition, LfcinB (20–25)2 and LfcinB (20–25)4 also exhibited effective activity against the Gram-negative bacteria E. coli, S. enteritidis, and S. maltophilia, and the Gram-positive bacteria S. aureus and E. faecalis (Huertas Mendez et al. 2017; Huertas et al. 2017; Leon-Calvijo et al. 2015).
Through predictive analysis of the physical and chemical properties of the designed polymer, constructs were designed to increase the hydrophobicity and the positive charges. When the net charge of tetrameric LfcinB (20–25)4 was shifted from + 3 of the monomer LfcinB (20–25) up to +16, a net charge of + 4 was necessary for antimicrobial activity, and at least + 7 or higher is essential for antitumoral activity (Gifford et al. 2005). Due to the overexpression of anionic molecules on tumor surfaces, the positive charge also plays a crucial role in the electrostatic interactions that occur between peptide and tumor. This indicates that the selective cytotoxicity is closely associated with the positive charge. (Solarte et al. 2017). On the other hand, peptide hydrophobicity also has an important role in membrane selectivity and insertion, thus enhancing antimicrobial activity (Chen et al. 2007). However, the hydrophobicity of the peptide has a “threshold”, and once beyond it, the activity of the peptide declines and toxicity to mammalian cells increases (Glukhov et al. 2008).
Conclusion
In recent years, the design and modification of Lfcins have been studied intensively. In particular, the basic safety and support of Lfcins and their derivatives from native milk proteins found in mammary glands encouraged researchers to improve and screen their properties and functions for wider applications in the health of animals and humans. Despite these characteristics, the third safety evaluation cannot be waived for modified Lfcins. Molecular modification is no longer limited to site substitution of residues. New and better tools have been developed, including chemical modification, cyclization, chimera and polymerization, as well as their combination or cross utilization depending on requirements. Additionally, these strategies effectively expand the application scope of Lfcins and their derivatives in various fields such as nutritional enhancement and antimicrobial, anticancer, antiviral, antiparasitic, and anti-inflammatory activities. However, antimicrobial activity is not the only factor to be considered. Rather, attention should also be paid to obtaining a good balance among optimum hydrophobicity, positive charges and their distribution, drug resistance, stability, toxicity and convenience of production. Currently, most modified peptides have some shortcomings that limit their application. Therefore, future studies should obtain deeper insight into the design and optimization of Lfcins as a whole as well as the effects of the above factors to develop better nutrition-enhancing, preventive and therapeutic peptides.
References
Andersen JH, Osbakk SA, Vorland LH, Traavik T, Gutteberg TJ (2001) Lactoferrin and cyclic lactoferricin inhibit the entry of human cytomegalovirus into human fibroblasts. Antiviral Res 51(2):141–149
Andersen JH, Jenssen H, Gutteberg TJ (2003) Lactoferrin and lactoferricin inhibit Herpes simplex 1 and 2 infection and exhibit synergy when combined with acyclovir. Antiviral Res 58(3):209–215
Appelt C, Wessolowski A, Söderhäll JA, Dathe M, Schmieder P (2005) Structure of the antimicrobial, cationic hexapeptide cyclo (RRWWRF) and its analogues in solution and bound to detergent micelles. ChemBioChem 6(9):1654–1662
Arias M, McDonald LJ, Haney EF, Nazmi K, Bolscher JG, Vogel HJ (2014) Bovine and human lactoferricin peptides: chimeras and new cyclic analogs. Biometals 27(5):935–948
Arias M, Hilchie AL, Haney EF, Bolscher JG, Hyndman ME, Hancock RE, Vogel HJ (2016) Anticancer activities of bovine and human lactoferricin-derived peptides. Biochem Cell Biol 95(1):91–98
Azuma M, Del Carpio C, Kojima T, Yokoyama I, Tajiri H, Yoshikawa K, Saga S (1999) Antibacterial activity of multiple antigen peptides homologous to a loop region in human lactoferrin. Chem Biol Drug Des 54(3):237–241
Bellamy W, Takase M, Yamauchi K, Wakabayashi H, Kawase K, Tomita M (1992) Identification of the bactericidal domain of lactoferrin. Biochim Biophys Acta 1121(1–2):130–136
Berkhout B, van Wamel JL, Beljaars L, Meijer DK, Visser S, Floris R (2002) Characterization of the anti-HIV effects of native lactoferrin and other milk proteins and protein-derived peptides. Antiviral Res 55(2):341–355
Biasibetti E, Bruni N, Bigliati MCapucchio MT (2017) Lactoferricin/verbascoside topical emulsion: a possible alternative treatment for atopic dermatitis in dogs. Nat Prod Res 9:1–4
Blondelle SE, Takahashi E, Dinh KT, Houghten RA (1995) The antimicrobial activity of hexapeptides derived from synthetic combinatorial libraries. J Appl Bacteriol 78(1):39–46
Bolscher JG, Adão R, Nazmi K, van den Keybus PA, van’t Hof W et al (2009) Bactericidal activity of Lfchimera is stronger and less sensitive to ionic strength than its constituent lactoferricin and lactoferrampin peptides. Biochimie 91(1):123–132
Brock JH (1980) Lactoferrin in human milk: its role in iron absorption and protection against enteric infection in the newborn infant. Arch Dis Child 55(6):417–421
Bruni N, Capucchio MT, Biasibetti E, Pessione E, Cirrincione S, Giraudo L et al (2016) Antimicrobial activity of lactoferrin-related peptides and applications in human and veterinary medicine. Molecules 21(6):752
Burrow H, Kanwar RK, Kanwar JR (2011) Antioxidant enzyme activities of iron-saturated bovine lactoferrin (Fe-bLf) in human gut epithelial cells under oxidative stress. J Med Chem 7(3):224–230
Caputo L, Quintieri L, Bianchi DM, Decastelli L, Monaci L, Visconti A et al (2015) Pepsin-digested bovine lactoferrin prevents Mozzarella cheese blue discoloration caused by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Food Microbiol 46:15–24
Chen Y, Guarnieri MT, Vasil AI, Vasil ML, Mant CT, Hodges RS (2007) Role of peptide hydrophobicity in the mechanism of action of alpha-helical antimicrobial peptides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51(4):1398
Chen R, Cole N, Dutta D, Kumar N, Willcox MDP (2017) Antimicrobial activity of immobilized lactoferrin and lactoferricin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 105(8):2612–2617
Dathe M, Nikolenko H, Klose J, Bienert M (2004) Cyclization increases the antimicrobial activity and selectivity of arginine- and tryptophan-containing hexapeptides. Biochemistry 43(28):9140–9150
Del OA, Morales P, Nuñez M (2009) Bactericidal activity of lactoferrin and its amidated and pepsin-digested derivatives against Pseudomonas fluorescens in ground beef and meat fractions. J Food Protect 72(4):760
Enrique M, Marcos JF, Yuste M, Martinez M, Valles S, Manzanares P (2008) Inhibition of the wine spoilage yeast Dekkera bruxellensis by bovine lactoferrin-derived peptides. Intl J Food Microbiol 127(3):229–234
Enrique M, Manzanares P, Yuste M, Martinez M, Valles S, Marcos JF (2009) Selectivity and antimicrobial action of bovine lactoferrin derived peptides against wine lactic acid bacteria. Food Microbiol 26(3):340–346
Federico B, Pinto L, Quintieri L, Carito A (2015) Efficacy of lactoferricin B in controlling ready-to-eat vegetable spoilage caused by Pseudomonas spp. Intl J. Food Microbiol 215:179–186
Fjell CD, Hiss JA, Hancock RE, Schneider G (2011) Designing antimicrobial peptides: form follows function. Nat Rev Drug Discov 11(1):37–51
Flores-Villaseñor H, Canizalez-Román A, Velazquez-Roman J, Nazmi K, Bolscher JG et al (2012) Protective effects of lactoferrin chimera and bovine lactoferrin in a mouse model of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157: H7 infection. Biochem Cell Biol 90(3):405–411
Fukuta S, Kei-Ichi K, Mizukami Y, Yoshimura Y, Jun-Ichi U, Kanbe M (2012) Transgenic tobacco plants expressing antimicrobial peptide bovine lactoferricin show enhanced resistance to phytopathogens. Plant Biotechnol 29(4):383–389
Gifford JL, Hunter HN, Vogel HJ (2005) Lactoferricin: a lactoferrin-derived peptide with antimicrobial, antiviral, antitumor and immunological properties. Cell Mol Life Sci 62(22):2588–2598
Glukhov E, Burrows LL, Deber CM (2008) Membrane interactions of designed cationic antimicrobial peptides: the two thresholds. Biopolymers 89(5):360–371
Greathouse D, Vostrikov V, McClellan N, Chipollini J, Lay J, Liyanage R, Ladd T (2008) Lipid interactions of acylated tryptophan-methylated lactoferricin peptides by solid-state NMR. J Pept Sci 14(10):1103–1110
Han FF, Gao YH, Luan C, Xie YG, Liu YF, Wang YZ (2013) Comparing bacterial membrane interactions and antimicrobial activity of porcine lactoferricin-derived peptides. J Dairy Sci 96(6):3471–3487
Haney EF, Nazmi K, Lau F, Bolscher JG, Vogel HJ (2009) Novel lactoferrampin antimicrobial peptides derived from human lactoferrin. Biochimie 91(1):141–154
Haug BE, Svendsen JS (2001) The role of tryptophan in the antibacterial activity of a 15-residue bovine lactoferricin peptide. J Pept Sci 7(4):190–196
Haug BE, Skar ML, Svendsen JS (2001) Bulky aromatic amino acids increase the antibacterial activity of 15-residue bovine lactoferricin derivatives. J Pept Sci 7(8):425–432
Håversen L, Kondori N, Baltzer L, Hanson LÅ, Dolphin GT, Duner K, Mattsby-Baltzer I (2010) Structure-microbicidal activity relationship of synthetic fragments derived from the antibacterial α-helix of human lactoferrin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54(1):418–425
Hou ZP, Wang WJ, Liu JX, Liu G, Liu ZQ, Souffrant WB et al (2011) Effects of lactoferricin B and cecropin P1 on growth performance, faecal score and dry matter in weaned piglets orally challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli F4. J Food Agric Environ 9:275–280
Huertas Mendez NJ, Vargas Casanova Y, Gomez Chimbi AK, Hernandez E, Leal Castro AL, Melo Diaz JM et al (2017) Synthetic peptides derived from bovine lactoferricin exhibit antimicrobial activity against E. coli ATCC 11775, S. maltophilia ATCC 13636 and S. enteritidis ATCC 13076. Molecules 22(3):452
Huertas N, Monroy Z, Medina R, Castañeda J (2017) Antimicrobial activity of truncated and polyvalent peptides derived from the FKCRRQWQWRMKKGLA sequence against Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923. Molecules 22(6):987
Hunter HN, Demcoe AR, Jenssen H, Gutteberg TJ, Vogel HJ (2005) Human lactoferricin is partially folded in aqueous solution and is better stabilized in a membrane mimetic solvent. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49(8):3387–3395
Jenssen H, Andersen JH, Uhlin-Hansen L, Gutteberg TJ, Rekdal Ø (2004) Anti-HSV activity of lactoferricin analogues is only partly related to their affinity for heparan sulfate. Antiviral Res 61(2):101–109
Jenssen H, Sandvik K, Andersen JH, Hancock RE, Gutteberg TJ (2008) Inhibition of HSV cell-to-cell spread by lactoferrin and lactoferricin. Antiviral Res 79(3):192–198
Jiang R, Lönnerdal B (2017) Bovine lactoferrin and lactoferricin exert antitumor activities on human colorectal cancer cells (HT-29) by activating various signaling pathways. Biochem Cell Biol 95(1):99
Johnson CR, Morin PE, Arrowsmith CH, Freire E (1995) Thermodynamic analysis of the structural stability of the tetrameric oligomerization domain of p53 tumor suppressor. Biochem-Us 34(16):5309–5316
Kang JH, Lee MK, Kim KL (1996) Structure-biological activity relationships of 11-residue highly basic peptide segment of bovine lactoferrin. Chem Biol Drug Des 48(4):357–363
Kawai K, Nagahata H, Lee NY, Anri AS, Himazaki K (2003) Effect of infusing lactoferrin hydrolysate into bovine mammary glands with subclinical mastitis. Vet Res Commu 27(7):539
Khan AR, Taneja P (2015) Cationic peptide lactoferricin B inhibits glutathione s-transferase P1 from human placenta and breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 preventing anticancer drug metabolism. Int J Pharm Pharma Sci 7:238–241
Khan AR, Sadiq IZ, Abdullahi LI, Danlami D, Taneja P (2016) Chemoprotective role of bovine lactoferricin against 7,12 dimethylbenz (A) anthracene induced skin cancer in female swiss albino mice. Intl J Pharm Pharm Sci 8:215–222
Kim AH, Greathouse DV (2016) Lactoferricin peptides: the importance of methyl-tryptophan and glutamine for structure and activity. Biophys J 110(3):252a
Krieg AM, Yi AK, Matson S, Waldschmidt TJ, Bishop GA, Teasdale R et al (1995) CpG motifs in bacterial DNA trigger direct B-cell activation. Nature 374(6522):546–549
Kruzel ML, Bacsi A, Choudhury B, Sur S, Boldogh I (2006) Lactoferrin decreases pollen antigen- induced allergic airway inflammation in a murine model of asthma. Immunology 119(2):159–166
Leboffe L (2009) Antifungal and antiparasitic activities of lactoferrin. Anti-infect Agents Med Chem 8(2):114–127
Lemmon MA, Flanagan JM, Treutlein HR, Zhang J, Engelman DM (1992) Sequence specificity in the dimerization of transmembrane alpha-helices. Biochem-Us 31(51):12719
Leon-Calvijo MA, Leal-Castro AL, Almanzar-Reina GA, Rosas-Perez JE, Garcia-Castaneda JE, Rivera-Monroy ZJ (2015) Antibacterial activity of synthetic peptides derived from lactoferricin against Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212. BioMed Res Intl 2015:453826
Lin CY, Yang PH, Kao CL, Huang HJ (2010) Transgenic zebrafish eggs containing bactericidal peptide is a novel food supplement enhancing resistance to pathogenic infection of fish. Fish Shellfish Immunol 28(3):419–427
Liu Y, Han F, Xie Y, Wang Y (2011) Comparative antimicrobial activity and mechanism of action of bovine lactoferricin-derived synthetic peptides. Biometals 24(6):1069–1078
Lonnerdal B, Iyer S (1995) Lactoferrin: molecular structure and biological function. Annu Rev Nutr 15(1):93–110
Marr AK, Jenssen H, Moniri MR, Hancock RE, Pante N (2009) Bovine lactoferrin and lactoferricin interfere with intracellular trafficking of Herpes simplex virus-1. Biochimie 91(1):160–164
Masson P, Heremans JF, Prignot J (1965) Immunohistochemical localization of the iron-binding protein lactoferrin in human bronchial glands. Experientia 21(10):604–605
Masson PL, Heremans JF, Ferin J (1968) Presence of an Iron-binding protein (lactoferrin) in the genital tract of the human female. I. Its immunohistochemical localization in the endometrium. Intl J Fertil Steril 19(5):679–689
Mattsbybaltzer I, Roseanu A, Motas C, Elverfors J, Engberg I, Hanson LA (1996) Lactoferrin or a fragment thereof inhibits the endotoxin-induced interleukin-6 response in human monocytic cells. Pediatric Res 40(2):257
Mistry N, Drobni P, Naslund J, Sunkari VG, Jenssen H, Evander M (2007) The anti-papillomavirus activity of human and bovine lactoferricin. Antiviral Res 75(3):258–265
Muñoz A, Marcos JF (2006) Activity and mode of action against fungal phytopathogens of bovine lactoferricin-derived peptides. J Appl Microbiol 101(6):1199–1207
Nguyen LT, Schibli DJ, Vogel HJ (2005) Structural studies and model membrane interactions of two peptides derived from bovine lactoferricin. J Pept Sci 11(7):379–389
Nguyen LT, Chau JK, Perry NA, De Boer L, Zaat SA, Vogel HJ (2010) Serum stabilities of short tryptophan-and arginine-rich antimicrobial peptide analogs. PLoS ONE 5(9):e12684
Odell EW, Sarra R, Foxworthy M, Chapple DS, Evans RW (1996) Antibacterial activity of peptides homologous to a loop region in human lactoferrin. FEBS Lett 382(1–2):175–178
Omata Y, Satake M, Maeda R, Saito A, Shimazaki K, Yamauchi K et al (2001) Reduction of the infectivity of Toxoplasma gondii and Eimeria stiedai sporozoites by treatment with bovine lactoferricin. J Vet Med Sci 63(2):187
Oo TZ, Cole N, Garthwaite L, Willcox MDP, Zhu H (2010) Evaluation of synergistic activity of bovine lactoferricin with antibiotics in corneal infection. J Antimicrob Chemoth 65(6):1243–1251
Pan WR, Chen PW, Chen YL, Hsu HC, Lin CC, Chen WJ (2013) Bovine lactoferricin B induces apoptosis of human gastric cancer cell line AGS by inhibition of autophagy at a late stage. J Dairy Sci 96(12):7511–7520
Park JH, Park GT, Cho IH, Sim SM, Yang JM, Lee DY (2011) An antimicrobial protein, lactoferrin exists in the sweat: proteomic analysis of sweat. Exp Dermatol 20(4):369–371
Puknun A, Bolscher JG, Nazmi K, Veerman EC, Tungpradabkul S, Wongratanacheewin S et al (2013) A heterodimer comprised of two bovine lactoferrin antimicrobial peptides exhibits powerful bactericidal activity against Burkholderia pseudomallei. World J Microb Biot 29(7):1217–1224
Quintieri L, Caputo L, Monaci L, Deserio D, Morea M, Baruzzi F (2012) Antimicrobial efficacy of pepsin-digested bovine lactoferrin on spoilage bacteria contaminating traditional Mozzarella cheese. Food Microbiol 31(1):64–71
Quintieri L, Pistillo BR, Caputo L, Favia P, Baruzzi F (2013) Bovine lactoferrin and lactoferricin on plasma-deposited coating against spoilage Pseudomonas spp. Innov Food Sci Emerg 20:215–222
Rekdal Ø, Andersen J, Vorland LH, Svendsen JS (1999) Construction and synthesis of lactoferricin derivatives with enhanced antibacterial activity. J Pept Sci 5(1):32–45
Riedl S, Rinner B, Tumer S, Schaider H, Lohner K, Zweytick D (2011) Targeting the cancer cell membrane specifically with human lactoferricin derivatives. Ann Oncol 22(20):33
Schibli DJ, Hwang PM, Vogel HJ (1999) The structure of the antimicrobial active center of lactoferricin B bound to sodium dodecyl sulfate micelles. FEBS Lett 446(2–3):213–217
Shestakov A, Jenssen H, Nordstrom I, Eriksson K (2012) Lactoferricin but not lactoferrin inhibit herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in mice. Antiviral Res 93(3):340–345
Shinoda I, Takase M, Fukuwatari Y et al (1996) Effects of lactoferrin and lactoferricin® on the release of interleukin 8 from human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Biosci Biotech Bioch 60(3):521–523
Silva T, Magalhães B, Maia S, Gomes P, Nazmi K, Bolscher JG et al (2014) Killing of Mycobacterium avium by lactoferricin peptides: improved activity of arginine- and D-amino-acid-containing molecules. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58(6):3461–3467
Sinha M, Kaushik S, Kaur P, Sharma S, Singh TP (2013) Antimicrobial lactoferrin peptides: the hidden players in the protective function of a multifunctional protein. Int J. Peps 2013:390230
Snick JL, Masson PL, Heremans JF (1974) The involvement of lactoferrin in the hyposideremia of acute inflammation. J Exp Med 140(4):18
Solarte VA, Rosas JE, Rivera ZJ, Arango-Rodriguez ML, Garcia JE, Vernot JP (2015) A tetrameric peptide derived from bovine lactoferricin exhibits specific cytotoxic effects against oral squamous-cell carcinoma cell lines. Biomed Res Int 2015:630179
Solarte VA, Conget P, Vernot JP, Rosas JE, Rivera ZJ, Garcia JE et al (2017) A tetrameric peptide derived from bovine lactoferricin as a potential therapeutic tool for oral squamous cell carcinoma: a preclinical model. PLoS ONE 12(3):e0174707
Strøm MB, Svendsen JS, Rekdal Ø (2000) Antibacterial activity of 15-residue lactoferricin derivatives. Chem Biol Drug Des 56(5):265–274
Strøm MB, Haug BE, Rekdal O, Skar ML, Stensen W, Svendsen JS (2002) Important structural features of 15-residue lactoferricin derivatives and methods for improvement of antimicrobial activity. Biochem Cell Biol 80(1):65–74
Tang ZR, Yin YL, Zhang YM, Huang RL, Sun ZH, Li TJ et al (2009) Effects of dietary supplementation with an expressed fusion peptide bovine lactoferricin-lactoferrampin on performance, immune function and intestinal mucosal morphology in piglets weaned at age 21 d. Brit J Nutr 101(7):998
Tang ZR, Sun ZH, Tang XS, Feng ZM, Zhou D, Xiao DF et al (2011) Dietary bovine lactoferricin improved gut microflora, benefited intestinal mucosal morphology and inhibited circular cytokines delivery in 21-day weaned piglets. J Appl Anim Res 39(2):153–157
Tomita M, Takase M, Bellamy W, Shimamura S (1994) A review: the active peptide of lactoferrin. Acta Paediatr Jpn 36(5):585–591
Ulvatne H, Vorland LH (2001) Bactericidal kinetics of 3 lactoferricins against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Scand J Infect Dis 33(7):507–511
van der Kraan MI, Groenink J, Nazmi K, Veerman EC, Bolscher JG, Amerongen AVN (2004) Lactoferrampin: a novel antimicrobial peptide in the N1-domain of bovine lactoferrin. Peptides 25(2):177–183
Vercelli A, Fanton N, Bruni N, Vergnano D, Bigliati M, Cornegliani L (2015) Use of lactoferricin, verbascoside and glycerophosphoinositol emulsion in otitis externa treatment: a pilot study. Veterinaria 29(3):49–57
Vorland LH, Ulvatne H, Andersen J, Haukland H, Rekdal O, Svendsen JS et al (1998) Lactoferricin of bovine origin is more active than lactoferricins of human, murine and caprine origin. Scand J Infect Dis 30(5):513–517
Wakabayashi H, Matsumoto H, Hashimoto K, Teraguchi S, Takas M, Hayasawa H (1999) N-Acylated and D enantiomer derivatives of a nonamer core peptide of lactoferricin B showing improved antimicrobial activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43(5):1267–1269
Wakabayashi H, Uchida K, Yamauchi K, Teraguchi S, Hayasawa H, Yamaguchi H (2000) Lactoferrin given in food facilitates dermatophytosis cure in guinea pig models. J Antimicrob Chemoth 46(4):595–602
Wessolowski A, Bienert M, Dathe M (2004) Antimicrobial activity of arginine- and tryptophan-rich hexapeptides: the effects of aromatic clusters, d-amino acid substitution and cyclization. Chem Biol Drug Des 64(4):159–169
Yamauchi K, Tomita M, Giehl TJ, Rd ER (1993) Antibacterial activity of lactoferrin and a pepsin-derived lactoferrin peptide fragment. Infect Immun 61(2):719
Yoo YC, Watanabe R, Koike Y, Mitobe M, Shimazaki K, Watanabe S et al (1997a) Apoptosis in human leukemic cells induced by lactoferricin, a bovine milk protein-derived peptide: involvement of reactive oxygen species. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 237(3):624–628
Yoo YC, Watanabe S, Watanabe R, Hata K, Shimazaki K, Azuma I (1997b) Bovine lactoferrin and lactoferricin, a peptide derived from bovine lactoferrin, inhibit tumor metastasis in mice. Jpn J Cancer Res 88(2):184
Zweytick D, Deutsch G, Andrä J, Blondelle SE, Vollmer E, Jerala R, Lohner K (2011) Studies on lactoferricin-derived Escherichia coli membrane-active peptides reveal differences in the mechanism of N-acylated versus nonacylated peptides. J Biol Chem 286(24):21266–21276
Zweytick D, Japelj B, Mileykovskaya E, Zorko M, Dowhan W, Blondelle S et al (2014) N-acylated peptides derived from human lactoferricin perturb organization of cardiolipin and phosphatidylethanolamine in cell membranes and induce defects in Escherichia coli cell division. PLoS ONE 9(3):e90228
Acknowledgements
The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31702146, 31772640, 31601968, 31572445, 31572444 and 31372346), the Project of the National Support Program for Science and Technology in China (No. 2013BAD10B02), the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest in China (No.201403047), the AMP Direction of Innovation Program of Agric Sci & Tech in CAAS (CAAS-ASTIP-2013-FRI-02), and the ATA Innovative and Industrization of Key Project of Scientific Research of Innovation Program of Agric Sci & Tech in CAAS (CAAS-ASTIP-2018-07).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hao, Y., Yang, N., Teng, D. et al. A review of the design and modification of lactoferricins and their derivatives. Biometals 31, 331–341 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-018-0086-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-018-0086-6