Abstract
Dry detoxification is a major technology used at the industrial scale for remediation of chromium slag. However, the mechanism of this reaction is poorly known, in particular the kinetics and the role of minerals. Here, we studied elemental and mineralogical compositions during chromium slag detoxification by carbon monoxide, using data from X-ray powder diffraction, electron backscattered diffraction, energy-dispersive spectrometry and chemical analysis. The detoxification kinetics were studied by thermal analysis techniques using thermogravimetric and differential thermogravimetric analysis. Results show that the decomposition of Cr(VI)-containing minerals is responsible for the reduction process. The apparent activation energy is 41.36 kJ mol−1, from a calculation using the Flynn–Wall–Ozawa iso-conversional method.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Chromium slag is a hazardous industrial waste with high content of hexavalent chromium Cr(VI), which is a widespread contaminant owing to extensive industrial applications of chromium such as electroplating, leather tanning and dyeing industry (Wu et al. 2010; Li et al. 2015). The improper disposal of chromium slag causes environmental pollution, ultimately endangering public health (Gao and Xia 2011; Gunkel-Grillon et al. 2014). In order to meet the regulations and restrict detrimental effects, chromium slag should be treated to decrease its toxicity.
The process of transforming Cr(VI) to less toxic, insoluble Cr(III) is known as detoxification, which can be achieved through a variety of physical, chemical and biological methods (Jobby et al. 2018). Dry detoxification is the most facile approach among the reported technologies in industrial practice, due to the suitability for bulk processing of slags and for ex situ treatment. In order to reduce costs, increasing attention has been paid to the applications of other types of industrial wastes as reductants, such as municipal sludge and yellow phosphorus tail gas (Shi et al. 2007). As the excellent reducing properties and heat value, the widely available and reusable industrial carbon monoxide (CO) off-gas is put forward as a good substitute in the industrial scale dry-detoxification method (He et al. 2018).
Kinetic analysis plays a central role to understand a reaction. It has been used to understand the mechanism for Cr(VI) detoxification in the hydro-based reactions, including microbial detoxification, electrodeposition, phytoextraction, chemical immobilization and sorption (Gallios and Vaclavikova 2008; Chen et al. 2016; Guan et al. 2017; Wu et al. 2018). Nevertheless, very few studies are available on the dry-detoxification reaction under high temperature, due to the difficulties to analyze the thermally active gas–solid phase reaction.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) is a method used to study thermally active reactions by thermogravimetry (TG) and derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) curves under programmed temperature control (Jaroenkhasemmeesuk and Tippayawong 2016; Liu et al. 2016). Many mathematical approaches were applied to determine kinetic parameters, but the model-free/iso-conversional approach is the most reliable method for calculating the apparent activation energy (E), as there is no need to assume reaction mechanism functions (Oladokun et al. 2016; Müsellim et al. 2018). Among the diverse selection of iso-conversional methods, the Flynn–Wall–Ozawa (FWO) method is extensively used for its accuracy and simplicity (Kissinger 1957; Ozawa 1992; Starink 2003). Thus, we studied here the mineralogical variations and apparent activation energy in dry detoxification of chromium slag by CO.
Experimental
Sample analysis and detoxification procedure
The chromium slag samples were acquired from the storage site of an idle chromium salt factory located in an industrial park in the Yunnan Province of China. The untreated slag was air-dried at room temperature and milled to less than 0.125 mm particle size.
The reduced slag was prepared through the detoxification process conducted as follows: The air-dried and milled original chromium slag was placed into a vacuum-tube electric furnace (SK-1200, Zhonghuan, Tianjin, China), followed by passing 99.9% CO cylinder gas through the furnace and heating to 450 °C for 30 min. All the cylinder gases were purchased from Messer (Messer Group GmbH, Bad Soden, Germany), and all chemicals and solvents used were of analytical grade.
The Cr(VI) leaching was analyzed by hydrazine spectrophotometry (SP-752 UV–Vis Spectrometer, Spectrum, China), and after H2SO4–HNO3 digestion, leaching procedure was conducted according to the Chinese Environmental Protection Standard HJ/T 299-2007 (MEPC 2007). The total Cr(VI) content was analyzed by atomic absorption spectrometry (AA-7000, Shimadzu, Japan) after alkaline digestion according to the Chinese Environmental Protection Standard HJ 687-2014 (MEPC 2014). The Cr(VI) leaching concentration and total Cr(VI) content in each sample were determined in triplicate.
Characterization
Chemical content in the samples was determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) (AxiosmAX, PANalytical, Netherlands). The mineral phases were analyzed by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) with Cu Kα radiation and Ni filter in the 2θ ranging from 5° to 90°, and a scanning rate of 2°/min at 40 mA and 40 kV (Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer system). The Jade 6.0 software was applied for the analysis based on the mineralogical database of PDF-2004.
The electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) analysis was conducted as follows: First, powder samples were mixed with epoxy resin and cured for 24 h; then, the cured blocks were polished using a polishing machine, and the smooth cross sections were sputtered with gold; finally, backscattered electron micrographs of morphological characterization were acquired through field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) (Gemini 300, Zeiss, Germany). The elementary composition was investigated by combining use of energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS) (XFlash 6-30, Bruker, Germany).
Thermogravimetric and differential thermogravimetric analysis
Thermogravimetric and differential thermogravimetric (TG–DTG) analysis was carried out to obtain the thermogravimetric data (TG and DTG curves) under diverse heating rates with a thermal analyzer (Labsys Evolution, setaram, France). Approximately, 7.5 mg of the untreated slag was placed in a platinum crucible and put in the thermal analyzer, and the temperature was gradually increased from 25 to 800 °C in an inert atmosphere of 90% CO and 10% argon purified gases at the heating rates of 5, 10, 15 and 20 °C min−1, respectively, while the flow rate of mixed purified gas was maintained constant at 50 mL min−1.
Results and discussion
Mineral analysis and variation
Results show that Cr(VI) leaching was 373 mg L−1 in untreated slag and 0.01 mg L−1 in reduced slag. Total Cr(VI) was 7040 mg kg−1 in untreated slag and 11 mg kg−1 in reduced slag. Also, 99.84% of Cr(VI) was reduced during detoxification.
Minerals were analyzed in untreated slag and reduced slag by XRD analysis (Fig. 1), which indicated that the mineral composition of chromium slag was complex (Földi et al. 2013). According to Hillier et al. (2003), the mineral compounds can be classified into three groups: The first group was unreacted feedstock ore, only included chromite; the second group was “parent” minerals produced in the high-temperature roasting process, mainly included brownmillerite, periclase and larnite; the third group was weathering products and minerals formed in the leaching stage, such as brucite, calcite, ettringite and hydrogarnet.
The first-group minerals have not been detected. Minerals detected in untreated slag were mostly consistent with the previously published mineral assembly in other researches (Deakin et al. 2001). They mainly belonged to the second and third-group minerals. The second-group minerals included periclase, brownmillerite, srebrodolskite (a subclass of brownmillerite) and larnite. The third-group minerals included gyrolite, hydrogarnet, lizardite-1T and lizardite-1M. Hydrogarnet is the hydration product of brownmillerite, which has been demonstrated to be the main Cr(VI)-containing minerals (Geelhoed et al. 2002). Gyrolite, lizardite-1T and lizardite-1M were layered double-hydroxide minerals of high anion exchange capacity which could hold chromate anions in the interlayer (Földi et al. 2013).
Minerals in the reduced slag mainly include: periclase, brownmillerite, calcite and quartz. As the hydration and weathering products were unstable under high temperature, calcite and part of periclase are the decomposition products of the third minerals under heating. Quartz occurred only in trace amounts, and its sources are complicated (Hillier et al. 2003).
From the perspective of mineral composition, the third-group minerals completely disappeared after reduction. Weak intensity XRD peaks of Na2CrO4 and eskolaite were detected in untreated and reduced slag, respectively, which is in agreement with the equation of the main reducing reaction (Eq. 1) and with the chemical analysis results. Our findings thus suggest that the decomposition of the third-group minerals is responsible for the release of Cr(VI), which was then reduced by CO.
For in-depth determination of the minerals and elements, XRF and EBSD–EDS were then conducted. XRF analysis showed that six elements, O, Ca, Mg, Fe, Al and Cr, accounted for over of 90% of samples mass, their proportions being 50.9%, 15.0%, 13.3%, 8.31%, 3.2% and 3.2% in the untreated slag, and 31.8%, 21.9%, 14.1%, 13.7%, 5.0% and 5.0% in the reduced slag. The elements determined by the EDS were similar than those from XRF results. Electron micrograph of particles and element distribution are presented in Fig. 2. The particle sizes in untreated slag were larger, and the size difference between particles was also greater than that of reduced slag, as shown in Fig. 2a, b. Element distribution maps illustrate that Ca, O, Fe, Al and Cr are uniformly distributed throughout the particles, and their distribution contours were overlapped. Though these minerals could not be clearly separated, complementary analysis using mineral formulas provides evidence that brownmillerite and its converted products were the main phases in the samples, and that Cr(VI) was bound to the mineral matrix, which also led to the difficulty of mitigation of Cr(VI) (Tinjum et al. 2008). Overall, results show that detoxification relies in the decomposition of the third-group minerals.
Calculation of apparent activation energy E by Flynn–Wall–Ozawa method
The main reaction equation of chromium slag reduction by CO is:
Thermal analysis kinetic research was conducted through thermogravimetric and differential thermogravimetric (TG–DTG) analysis (Fig. 3). The thermogravimetric (TG) curve showed very rapid mass loss, in combination with the X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) and Eq. 1, and the mass loss was concluded to be largely attributed to the decomposition of minerals in the slag and the reduction in Na2CrO4.
The basic kinetic equation of the non-isothermal heterogeneous reaction could be expressed as follows (Eq. 2):
where a is the reaction conversion degree defined by weight, A is the pre-exponential factor, E is the apparent activation energy, and f(a) is the simulated mathematical function of the reaction.
In general, the conversion degree a could be expressed by the weight loss as follows (Eq. 3):
Herein, w0, wt and wf denote the mass of the sample initially, at time t and finally, respectively.
In the non-isothermal reaction, the term β was defined as different heating rates (Eq. 4):
By substituting Eq. (4) to Eq. (2), the expression for the detoxification at different heating rates is provided by Eq. (5):
Subsequently, Eq. 5 was integrated to obtain the conversion function g(α), which describes the kinetics of the detoxification reaction at diverse heating rates (Eq. 6):
The solution to Eq. 6 could be obtained by the Doyle’s approximation: P(E/RT) = − 5.331–1.052E/RT, which forms the theoretical basis for the iso-conversional kinetic models of Flynn–Wall–Ozawa (FWO) method (Doyle 1965). The final expression was described as follows (Eq. 7):
The maximum mass loss (wMax) at a specific temperature was obtained at the interaction of tangent to the peak of the differential thermogravimetric (DTG) curve, known as peak temperature (Tp). For \({ \lg }\left( {AE/Rg\left( a \right) } \right)\) is a constant, R is universal gas constant (8.314 J mol−1 K−1), the plot of lgβ against 1/T could be built at diverse heating rates, and E value is calculated from the slope − 0.4567 E/R.
Apparent activation energy (E) is one of the kinetic three factors, which is thought to be the minimum energy required for a chemical reaction, and it could reflect the reaction rate of chemical reactions. The corresponding data of FWO methods for solving E value are presented in Table 1. The wMax values were very close, and the conversion degrees at Tp were approximately equal. The slope of the fitting equation was − 2271.89, and E was calculated to be 41.36 kJ mol−1. The liner correlation coefficient of the fitting equation was 0.9426, indicated that the plot was well fitted. Therefore, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was proved to be a reliable instrumental method in exploring the kinetic parameters of detoxification of chromium slags by CO.
Conclusion
XRD and EBSD–EDS analysis illustrates visually the variation of mineral phases in the chromium slag. Combined with the results of the leached and total Cr(VI) before and after detoxification, it is concluded that the third-group minerals were the major Cr(VI)-containing minerals, which amplified the difficulties in the detoxification of chromium slag. Their decomposition was responsible for the release of Cr(VI) and was the crucial premise for the reducing reaction. Furthermore, a detailed instrumental thermal analysis kinetics research by TG–DTG was performed, and apparent activation energy (E) was calculated by FWO method, which made up for the insufficient instrumental analysis kinetic research of dry detoxification of chromium slag.
References
Chen J, Wang Y, Wang H, Zhou S, Wu H, Lei X (2016) Detoxification/immobilization of hexavalent chromium using metakaolin-based geopolymer coupled with ferrous chloride. J Environ Chem Eng 4(2):2084–2089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.03.038
Deakin D, West LJ, Stewart DI, Yardley BW (2001) Leaching behaviour of a chromium smelter waste heap. Waste Manag 21(3):265–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-053X(00)00099-4
Doyle CD (1965) Series approximations to the equation of thermogravimetric data. Nature 207:290–291. https://doi.org/10.1038/207290a0
Földi C, Dohrmann R, Matern K, Mansfeld T (2013) Characterization of chromium-containing wastes and soils affected by the production of chromium tanning agents. J Soils Sediments 13(7):1170–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0714-2
Gallios GP, Vaclavikova M (2008) Removal of chromium (VI) from water streams: a thermodynamic study. Environ Chem Lett 6(4):235–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-007-0128-8
Gao Y, Xia J (2011) Chromium contamination accident in China: viewing environment policy of China. Environ Sci Technol 45(20):8605–8606. https://doi.org/10.1021/es203101f
Geelhoed JS, Meeussen JCL, Hillier S, Lumsdon DG, Thomas RP, Farmer JG, Paterson E (2002) Identification and geochemical modeling of processes controlling leaching of Cr(VI) and other major elements from chromite ore processing residue. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 66(22):3927–3942. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(02)00977-8
Guan X, Fan H, Yan S, Chang J (2017) Chromium (VI) concurrent detoxification and immobilization by gallate: kinetics, equilibrium, thermodynamics, and mechanism studies. J Environ Chem Eng 5(6):5762–5769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.10.007
Gunkel-Grillon P, Laporte-Magoni C, Lemestre M, Bazire N (2014) Toxic chromium release from nickel mining sediments in surface waters, New Caledonia. Environ Chem Lett 12(4):511–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-014-0475-1
He L, Li B, Ning P, Zhang T, Bi T, Gong X, Min X (2018) Method and process optimization of applying CO waste gas to detoxify chromite ore processing residue. J Environ Eng China 12(9):2617–2626. https://doi.org/10.12030/j.cjee.201804127
Hillier S, Roe MJ, Geelhoed JS, Fraser AR, Farmer JG, Paterson E (2003) Role of quantitative mineralogical analysis in the investigation of sites contaminated by chromite ore processing residue. Sci Total Environ 308(1):195–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00680-0
Jaroenkhasemmeesuk C, Tippayawong N (2016) Thermal degradation kinetics of sawdust under intermediate heating rates. Appl Therm Eng 103:170–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.08.114
Jobby R, Jha P, Yadav AK, Desai N (2018) Biosorption and biotransformation of hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)]: a comprehensive review. Chemosphere 207:255–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.050
Kissinger HE (1957) Reaction kinetics in differential thermal analysis. Anal Chem 29(11):1702–1706. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60131a045
Li Y, Li Q, Yang F, Bao J, Hu Z, Zhu W, Zhao Y, Lin Z, Dong Q (2015) Chromium (VI) detoxification by oxidation and flocculation of exopolysaccharides from Arthrobacter sp. B4. Int J Biol Macromol 81:235–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.07.013
Liu G, Liao Y, Guo S, Ma X, Zeng C, Wu J (2016) Thermal behavior and kinetics of municipal solid waste during pyrolysis and combustion process. Appl Therm Eng 98:400–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.12.067
MEPC (2007) Solid waste-extraction procedure for leaching toxicity- sulphuric acid and nitric acid method. No. HJ/T 299-2007
MEPC (2014) Solid waste-determination of hexavalent chromium-by alkaline digestion/flame atomic absorption spectrophotometric. No. HJ 687-2014
Müsellim E, Tahir MH, Ahmad MS, Ceylan S (2018) Thermokinetic and TG/DSC-FTIR study of pea waste biomass pyrolysis. Appl Therm Eng 137:54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.03.050
Oladokun O, Ahmad A, Abdullah TAT, Bello BB, Al-Shatri AH (2016) Multicomponent devolatilization kinetics and thermal conversion of Imperata cylindrica. Appl Therm Eng 105:931–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.04.165
Ozawa T (1992) Estimation of activation energy by isoconversion methods. Thermochim Acta 203:159–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6031(92)85192-X
Shi Y, Du X, Meng Q, Song S, Sui Z (2007) Reaction process of chromium slag reduced by industrial waste in solid phase. J Iron Steel Res Int 14(1):12–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(07)60003-X
Starink MJ (2003) The determination of activation energy from linear heating rate experiments: a comparison of the accuracy of isoconversion methods. Thermochim Acta 404(1–2):163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6031(03)00144-8
Tinjum JM, Benson CH, Edil TB (2008) Mobilization of Cr(VI) from chromite ore processing residue through acid treatment. Sci Total Environ 391:13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.10.041
Wu C, Zhang H, He P, Shao L (2010) Thermal stabilization of chromium slag by sewage sludge: effects of sludge quantity and temperature. J Environ Sci China 22(7):1110–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60225-4
Wu S, Hu Y, Zhang X, Sun Y, Wu Z, Li T, Li J, Zhang J, Zheng L, Huang L, Chen B (2018) Chromium detoxification in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis mediated by sulfur uptake and metabolism. Environ Exp Bot 147:43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.11.010
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Key Technology R&D Program of China (Grant 2017YFC0210500) and the Major Projects of Technical Innovation in Hubei Province of China (Grant 2017ACA092).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
He, L., Li, B., Lin, Z. et al. Mechanism of dry detoxification of chromium slag by carbon monoxide. Environ Chem Lett 17, 1375–1381 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-019-00868-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-019-00868-y