Abstract
CD13 receptor plays a critical role in tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. We therefore aimed to develop 99mTc-labeled monomeric and dimeric NGR-containing peptides, namely, NGR1 and NGR2, for SPECT imaging of CD13 expression in HepG2 hepatoma xenografts. Both NGR-containing monomer and dimer were synthesized and labeled with 99mTc. In vivo receptor specificity was demonstrated by successful blocking of tumor uptake of 99mTc-NGR dimer in the presence of 20 mg/kg NGR2 peptide. Western blot and immunofluorescence staining confirmed the CD13 expression in HepG2 cells. The NGR dimer showed higher binding affinity and cell uptake in vitro than the NGR-containing monomer, presumably due to a multivalency effect. 99mTc-Labeled monomeric and dimeric NGR-containing peptides were subjected to SPECT imaging and biodistribution studies. SPECT scans were performed in HepG2 tumor-bearing mice at 1, 4, 12, and 24 h post-injection of ~7.4 MBq tracers. The metabolism of tracers was determined in major organs at different time points after injection which demonstrated rapid, significant tumor uptake and slow tumor washout for both traces. Predominant clearance from renal and hepatic system was also observed in 99mTc-NGR1 and 99mTc-NGR2. In conclusion, monomeric and dimeric NGR peptide were developed and labeled with 99mTc successfully, while the high integrin avidity and long retention in tumor make 99mTc-NGR dimer a promising agent for tumor angiogenesis imaging.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The metalloexopeptidase CD13/aminopeptidase N (APN) plays a critical role in cancer angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis. The expression of CD13 is up-regulated in endothelial cells within murine and human tumors. Moreover, tissues that undergo angiogenesis blood vessels also overexpress APN (Pasqualini et al. 2000; Bhagwat et al. 2001; Zhang et al. 2005; Petrovic et al. 2007). The asparagine-glycine-arginine (NGR) motif in both cyclic and linear form has previously been shown to specifically bind to aminopeptidase N that is selectively overexpressed on tumor vasculature and some tumor cells (Bhagwat et al. 2001; Negussie et al. 2010).
A series of peptides have been successfully developed with excellent tumor targeted efficacy and favorable in vivo pharmacokinetics (Arap et al. 1998; Curnis et al. 2002; Yang et al. 2006; Meng et al. 2007; Dijkgraaf et al. 2011), such as tTF-NGR, which had the potential of specific delivery of the NGR-containing conjugates to CD13 positive cells (van Hensbergen et al. 2004; Yokoyama and Ramakrishnan 2005; von Wallbrunn et al. 2008; Ndinguri et al. 2009; Zhao et al. 2011). Application of cyclic NGR-labeled paramagnetic quantum dots (cNGR-pQDs) showed cNGR co-localizes with CD13 on neovessels of in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), while unlabeled pQDs were not only minimally detected with both MRI and two-photon laser scanning microscope (TPLSM) (Oostendorp et al. 2008). Moreover, NGR-hTNF conjugate in combination with standard chemotherapy demonstrated favorable tolerability and preliminary evidence of disease control in pretreated patients (Corti et al. 2010; Gregorc et al. 2010; Santoro et al. 2010; Schwoppe et al. 2010; van Laarhoven et al. 2010).
In this study, monomeric and dimeric NGR peptides were synthesized and labeled with 99mTc, then subjected to SPECT imaging of CD13 expression in a subcutaneous mouse HepG2 hepatoma xenograft model, which showed positive CD13 receptor and easy formation of tumor.
Materials and methods
General
All chemicals (reagent grade) were obtained from commercial suppliers and used without further purification. NGR1 (GNGRG) and NGR2 [(GNGRG)2KGK] were prepared by SPPS using the Fmoc method on a Chlorotrityl chloride resin. 99mTcO4 − was produced from 99Mo/99mTc generator (Beijing Atom High Tech, China). Water was purified using a Milli-Q ultra-pure water system from Millipore (Milford, USA), followed by passing through a Chelex 100 resin before bioconjugation and radiolabeling. Radio-TLC was performed on silica gel-coated plastic sheets (Polygram SIL G, Macherey–Nagel) with acetone and Vethanol:Vwater:Vammonia water = 2:5:1 as the eluents. The plates were read with Bioscan Mini-scan (USA) and Allchhrom Plus software. The semi preparative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, Aglint, Canada) was employed for peptide analysis. Mass spectra were obtained on a Q-Tof premier-UPLC system equipped with an electrospray interface (ESI; Waters, USA) or a Thermo Electron Finnigan LTQ mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ionization source (Thermo Scientific, USA).
Radiolabeling and formulation
NGR-containing peptides, including the monomeric GNGRG (NGR1), dimeric [(GNGRG)2KGK] (NGR2), and cyclic GCNGRC, were prepared by solid phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) using the Fmoc strategy on chlorotrityl chloride resins as previously reported (Lily Adar et al. 2011). Mass spectra were used to confirm the identity of the products. The fresh 99mTcO4 − solution (37–74 MBq) was added into a solution of NGR peptides (15–20 μg peptide per mCi 99mTcO4 −) with 200 μg stannous chloride dissolved in 1 M HCl (5 μg/μL) and 20 μL of 0.2 M NaAc/HAc buffer (pH 4.2) solution. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The 99mTcO4 −-containing solutions were filtered over a 0.2 μm syringe filter (Acrodisc, PALL, USA) before being purified by HPLC and then passed through a 0.2 μm Millipore filter into a sterile vial for use.
In vitro stability
The stability of 99mTc-labeled NGR peptides in PBS (phosphate buffered solution, pH 7.4) and fresh mouse serum was studied at different time points and the percentage of parent tracer was determined by radio-TLC.
Cell culture and animal model
HepG2 cells and HT-29 cells were grown in high glucose DMEM culture medium. All cell lines were cultured in medium supplemented with 10 % (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Gibco, USA), 1 % mycillin and 1 % glutaminate (Beyotime, China) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5 % CO2. Using female BALB/c nude mice (4–6 weeks of age), HepG2 tumor model was established by subcutaneous injection of 2 × 106 HepG2 tumor cells (0.1 mL) into the right upper flanks. When the tumor volume reached 0.8–1.0 cm in diameter (2–3 weeks after inoculation), the tumor-bearing mice were used for SPECT imaging and biodistribution studies. All animal studies were approved by Clinical Center at the FMMU.
Western blot analysis of CD13 expression on HepG2 cells
HepG2 and HT-29 cells grown in 75 cm2 culture flasks were resuspended in lysis buffer (Beyotime, China) supplemented with complete, mini protease inhibitors (Roche, Canada). The cell debris was removed by centrifugation (10,000 rpm at 4 °C for 10 min) and the protein concentration was determined with the Bradford Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime, China). Samples of cell extracts containing 40 μg of protein were loaded on SDS–PAGE gels and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membrane filters (Invitrogen, USA). CD13 protein was detected with anti-CD13 antibody (1:100, Santa Cruz, USA) and peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:400, Invitrogen, USA). The antigen–antibody complexes on the membranes were visualized with ECL Western Blotting Detection System (Thermo, USA) with ChemiDOC XRS + (Biorad, USA). Actin was also detected with anti-β-actin as an internal control and used for normalization purposes in the densitometric analysis.
Immunofluorescence staining of CD13 expression on HepG2 cells
To examine cellular surface expression of CD13, HepG2 and HT-29 cells were plated into 24-well plates at a density of 5 × 104 cells/well. After overnight incubation, cells were fixed in 4 % paraformaldehye for 10 min. Cells were then washed with PBS (1 N Phosphate Buffered Saline), blocked in normal goat serum (1 %) and then incubated with an anti-CD13 polyclonal antibody H300 (1:100, Santa Cruz, USA) for overnight at 4 °C. Fluorescein isocyanate goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:400, Invitrogen, USA) were used as the secondary antibody. Staining images were acquired with an Olympus IX71 microscope (Japan). DAPI (4, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) was used for nucleus staining.
Cell uptake study
HepG2 cells were seeded into 48-well plates at a density of 2 × 105 cells per well, 24 h prior to the experiment. HepG2 cells were then incubated with 99mTc-labeled NGR peptides (~370 kBq/well) at 37 °C for 15, 30, 60, and 120 min. After incubation, tumor cells were washed three times with ice cold PBS and harvested by trypsinization with 0.25 % trypsin/0.02 % EDTA (Hyclone, USA). Cell suspensions were collected and measured in a gamma counter (Zhida, Shannxi, China). Cell uptake data was presented as percentage of total input radioactivity added to the culture medium after decay correction. Experiments were performed twice with triplicate wells.
Cell-binding assay
In vitro CD13 receptor binding affinity and specificity of 99mTc-NGR1 and 99mTc-NGR2 were assessed via competitive cell-binding assay. The best-fit 50 % inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for the HepG2 cells were calculated by fitting the data with non-linear regression using Graph-Pad Prism 5.0 (Graph-Pad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
SPECT imaging and blocking experiment
HepG2 tumor-bearing animals were imaged in supine position with a one-head SPECT MPR (GE, USA) equipped with a pinhole collimator. About 7.4 MBq of 99mTc-labeled NGR peptides were intravenously injected into each mouse under intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital at a dose of 45.0 mg/kg. Static SPECT images were acquired at 1, 4, 12, and 24 h pi. For the blocking experiment, each HepG2 tumor-bearing mouse was scanned after the co-injection of 7.4 MBq of 99mTc-labeled NGR peptides with 20 mg/kg NGR2. The acquisition count limit was set at 200 k.
Biodistribution studies
HepG2 tumor-bearing mice were injected with ~7.4 MBq of 99mTc-labeled NGR peptides with or without excess unlabeled NGR peptides (20 mg/kg). At 4 h after injection of the tracer, mice were sacrificed and dissected. The radioactivity in the HepG2 tumor, major organs and muscles were collected and weighed wet with tubes (%ID/g). Mean uptake (%ID/g) for a group of animals was calculated with standard deviations. Values were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3/group).
Statistical analysis
Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± SD. Means were compared using one-way ANOVA and student’s t test. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Chemistry and radiochemistry
Both the monomeric NGR1 and dimeric NGR2 peptides were prepared (Fig. 1). The analytical HPLC and mass spectroscopy were used to confirm the identity of the products. The mass spectroscopy data and chemical structures for NGR1 and NGR2 were represented below (Fig. 1). The electrospray ionization mass spectra of NGR1 and NGR2 were determined to be m/z = 459.143 ([M + H]+) and m/z = 1,213.696 ([M + H]+), respectively. After purification, the specific activity of 99mTc-labeled tracers was determined to be about 11–16 MBq/nmol for 99mTc-NGR1 and 22–36 MBq/nmol for 99mTc-NGR2, respectively. The radiochemical purities of both tracers were >97 %. The in vitro stability of 99mTc-labeled NGR peptides in PBS (pH 7.4) and fresh mouse serum at 37 °C was shown in Fig. 2. After 12 h of incubation, more than 92 % of 99mTc-NGR peptides remained intact in PBS as well as mouse serum.
Western blotting and immunofluorescence staining
Western blotting analysis of CD13 expression on HepG2 cells showed a positive band that was correlated to the molecular size of CD13, whereas negative band was observed on HT-29 cells (Fig. 3). Visual assessment of fluorescent microscopy analysis indicated that CD13 was overexpressed on the cell surface of HepG2 cells, but not in the case of HT-29 cells, which was consistent with the results from western blotting analysis.
Cell uptake
Cell uptake study revealed that 99mTc-NGR1 and 99mTc-NGR2 could bind with HepG2 tumor cells. During the first 15 min, about 0.40 ± 0.02 % of 99mTc-NGR1 and 0.41 ± 0.19 % of 99mTc-NGR2 uptake in HepG2 cells were determined. After 2-h incubation, the peptide uptake in HepG2 cells reached the maximum of 1.49 ± 0.11 and 1.74 ± 0.07 %, respectively (Fig. 4a). The amount of 99mTc-NGR2 uptake in HepG2 cells was higher than that of 99mTc-NGR1. Both 99mTc-labeled peptides showed good cell retention. About 1.37 ± 0.18 % of 99mTc-NGR1 and 1.73 ± 0.12 % of 99mTc-NGR2 were still associated with HepG2 cells after 4-h incubation.
Cell-binding assay
Ligand-receptor binding affinities of 99mTc-NGR1 and 99mTc-NGR2 to CD13 were determined by a competitive cell-binding assay. Both 99mTc-labeled peptides inhibited the binding of NGR peptides to HepG2 cells in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 4b). The IC50 values for 99mTc-NGR1 and 99mTc-NGR2 were calculated to be 223 ± 23 and 157 ± 15 nmol/L, respectively.
SPECT imaging
The tumor-targeting efficacy of 99mTc-NGR probes in HepG2 tumor-bearing nude mice was evaluated by static SPECT scans at different time points after injection. Representative decay-corrected images were shown in Fig. 5. The HepG2 tumors were clearly visualized with good tumor-to-background contrast for both tracers. Significant tumor uptake reductions were observed in a blocking study. Co-injection of 99mTc-NGR2 with a blocking dose of NGR2, 99mTc-NGR2 was cleared from the body significantly faster and the uptake in most of the organs was lower than those without blocking agent. Overall, 99mTc-NGR2 provided better image quality with the same amount of injected activity.
Biodistribution studies
Tissue distribution data for 99mTc-NGR1 and 99mTc-NGR2 in mice bearing HepG2 hepatoma tumors were given as percentage administered activity per gram of tissue (%ID/g) in Table 1 and Fig. 6. In vivo biodistribution of with and without co-injection of non-radiolabeled NGR2 peptide (20 mg/kg of mouse body weight) was examined in HepG2 tumor-bearing mice. For 99mTc-NGR1, the tumor uptake was determined to be 3.47 ± 1.52, 2.67 ± 0.68, 1.90 ± 0.47 and 1.50 ± 0.67 %ID/g at 1, 4, 12, and 24 h, respectively. For 99mTc-NGR2, the tumor uptake was 6.22 ± 1.23, 5.03 ± 0.74, 3.74 ± 0.78 and 2.28 ± 1.29 %ID/g at 1, 4, 12, and 24 h, respectively (Fig. 6a, b). Both tracers were excreted mainly through the kidneys. 99mTc-NGR1 exhibited 15.87 ± 1.76 %ID/g kidney uptake compared with 17.76 ± 2.87 %ID/g in 99mTc-NGR2 at 1 h pi (P > 0.05). 99mTc-NGR2 showed 15.87 ± 1.76 %ID/g of liver uptake that is higher than that of the monomer (10.30 ± 1.32 %ID/g). This result might be attributed to the relatively large molecular size of NGR dimer. The non-specific uptake in the muscle was at a very low level for both tracers. Both compounds had comparable liver and muscle uptake. 99mTc-NGR2 exhibited higher tumor uptake at the early time point and better tumor retention (Fig. 6b), indicating the longer circulation time. In addition, 99mTc-NGR2 showed higher tumor uptake compared to 99mTc-NGR1, but the tumor-to-kidney ratio of 99mTc-NGR2 was significantly lower than 99mTc-NGR1. Similar tumor/muscle, tumor/liver, tumor/kidney, and tumor/heart ratios were observed for 99mTc-NGR1 and 99mTc-NGR2, while the absolute tumor uptake of 99mTc-NGR2 was significantly higher than that of 99mTc-NGR1 (P < 0.01).
A decrease of radioactivity was observed in all dissected tissues and organs, which was similar to SPECT imaging results in blocking group (Fig. 7), with the change of tumor uptake being the most significant reducing markedly from 5.03 ± 0.74 %ID/g, whereas the presence of non-labeled NGR peptides significantly reduced to 2.65 ± 0.21 %ID/g at 4 h after injection. For 99mTc-NGR2 non-blocking group, 10.93 ± 1.98 %ID/g in liver and 9.06 ± 0.67 %ID/g in kidney were decreased to 8.17 ± 0.16 and 6.93 ± 0.97 %ID/g by blocking, respectively.
Discussion
The development of radiolabeled peptides for diagnostic and therapeutic applications has expanded exponentially in the last decades (Wu et al. 2005; Dijkgraaf et al. 2011; Chen et al. 2012). Peptide-based radiopharmaceuticals can be produced easily and inexpensively, and have many favorable properties, including fast clearance, rapid tissue penetration, and low antigenicity (Arap et al. 1998; Meng et al. 2007; Ndinguri et al. 2009; Chen and Conti 2010; Corti et al. 2010). CD13 receptor is an attractive biological target, which has been found to be overexpressed on newly formed neovasculature and on a wide range of tumor cells types. In this study, we developed 99mTc-labeled NGR peptides for HepG2 tumor imaging. To our knowledge, this is the first SPECT imaging study to evaluate 99mTc-labeled NGR peptides (monomer and dimer) in a HepG2 tumor mouse model.
We constructed monomeric and dimeric NGR peptides and labeled with 99mTc in moderate yields (>92 % for both peptides). Both 99mTc-labeled tracers showed good stability in PBS and mouse serum. Western blot and immunofluorescence staining confirmed that CD13 receptor was overexpressed on HepG2 cells. The cell binding showed that NGR dimer had a higher affinity than monomer (Fig. 3), presumably due to a multivalency effect. The term multivalency effect described the use of more than one targeting ligand in a single reagent for simultaneously binding to multiple receptors to enhance the overall binding affinity. Others had reported that polymeric RGD peptide with more repeating cyclic RGD units significantly enhanced the binding affinity of RGD ligand to integrin αvβ3 receptor due to multivalency effect (Chen et al. 2004; Wu et al. 2005; Dijkgraaf et al. 2011; Lily Adar et al. 2011).
99mTc-labeled NGR peptides SPECT scans in a HepG2 hepatoma mouse model showed both 99mTc-NGR1 and 99mTc-NGR2 had a notable uptake in the HepG2 tumor, and dominant renal and hepatic clearance. Apparently, 99mTc-NGR2 had higher tumor uptake than 99mTc-NGR1 at different time points investigated, while 99mTc-NGR2 exhibited similar kidney and liver uptake compared with 99mTc-NGR1 (Fig. 5). Dimer showed higher uptake especially in living animal model than monomer because CD13 receptor was not only overexpressed on endothelial cell of neovessels but also on HepG2 cell, although color bar of images was adjusted to comparison. In addition, our study showed that 99mTc-NGR2 was superior to 99mTc-NGR1 in terms of both tumor uptake and tumor/background contrast, because 99mTc-NGR1 with relatively small molecular size led to shorter retention time and worse imaging quality than 99mTc-NGR2. Interestingly, although 99mTc-NGR2 demonstrated significantly higher tumor uptake than 99mTc-NGR1, the tumor/kidney ratio of the dimer was not higher than that of monomer (P > 0.05) at the later time point (12 h pi). This could be contributed to the clearance of 99mTc-NGR2 from the kidney with a large amount. In addition, although 99mTc-NGR1 and 99mTc-NGR2 had comparable tumor/kidney and tumor/liver ratios (Fig. 6d), tumor/muscle ratio of 99mTc-NGR2 was about twofold higher than that of the monomer, providing better imaging quality of 99mTc-NGR2 over than that of 99mTc-NGR1. The receptor specificity of 99mTc-NGR2 was further confirmed by effective inhibition of tumor uptake in the presence of excess non-labeled NGR2 peptide in both SPECT imaging and biodistribution studies (Figs. 5, 6).
In summary, our data demonstrated that 99mTc-NGR2 is a better SPECT imaging agent than 99mTc-NGR1 in terms of in vitro and in vivo properties. Our future work will focus on the development of radiolabeled NGR multimer derivatives, as well as determine whether the tumor/background ratio derived from SPECT imaging or biodistribution truly reflects the tumor–receptor expression level. Developing small but specific fusion protein conjugated with NGR peptide is also worthy to explore (Corti and Ponzoni 2004; Kessler et al. 2008; Lei et al. 2010). Because 99mTc-NGR1 and 99mTc-NGR2 showed high uptake in liver and kidney for their chemical structure and features of peptides’ excretion, optimal approach to reduce liver and kidney uptake is needed to image urological and hepatic malignancies (Ruggiero et al. 2010). In addition, a thorough comparison between radiolabeled NGR peptides and other angiogenesis-targeted probes, such as RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp peptide), is warranted to further determine the advantages of new radiotracers.
Conclusion
Monomeric and dimeric NGR peptides were successfully labeled with the generator-produced 99mTc for SPECT imaging of tumor CD13 receptor. The dimeric 99mTc-NGR2 exhibited overall better properties in vitro and in vivo as compared to monomeric 99mTc-NGR1, in terms of binding affinity, cellular uptake, tumor uptake and retention, and pharmacokinetics. 99mTc-NGR2 peptide is a promising SPECT agent for imaging of tumor angiogenesis.
References
Arap W, Pasqualini R et al (1998) Cancer treatment by targeted drug delivery to tumor vasculature in a mouse model. Science 279(5349):377–380
Bhagwat SV, Lahdenranta J et al (2001) CD13/APN is activated by angiogenic signals and is essential for capillary tube formation. Blood 97(3):652–659
Chen K, Conti PS (2010) Target-specific delivery of peptide-based probes for PET imaging. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 62(11):1005–1022
Chen X, Tohme M et al (2004) Micro-PET imaging of alphavbeta3-integrin expression with 18F-labeled dimeric RGD peptide. Mol Imaging 3(2):96–104
Chen K, Sun X et al (2012) Evaluation of (6)(4)Cu labeled GX1: a phage display peptide probe for PET imaging of tumor vasculature. Mol Imaging Biol 14(1):96–105
Corti A, Ponzoni M (2004) Tumor vascular targeting with tumor necrosis factor alpha and chemotherapeutic drugs. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1028:104–112
Corti A, Giovannini M et al (2010) Immunomodulatory agents with antivascular activity in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: focus on TLR9 Agonists, IMiDs and NGR-TNF. J Oncol 2010:732680
Curnis F, Arrigoni G et al (2002) Differential binding of drugs containing the NGR motif to CD13 isoforms in tumor vessels, epithelia, and myeloid cells. Cancer Res 62(3):867–874
Dijkgraaf I, Yim CB et al (2011) PET imaging of alphavbeta(3) integrin expression in tumours with (6)(8)Ga-labelled mono-, di- and tetrameric RGD peptides. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38(1):128–137
Gregorc V, Zucali PA et al (2010) Phase II study of asparagine-glycine-arginine-human tumor necrosis factor alpha, a selective vascular targeting agent, in previously treated patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol 28(15):2604–2611
Kessler T, Schwoppe C et al (2008) Generation of fusion proteins for selective occlusion of tumor vessels. Curr Drug Discov Technol 5(1):1–8
Lei H, Cao P et al (2010) Expression and functional characterization of tumor-targeted fusion protein composed of NGR peptide and 15-kDa actin fragment. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 162(4):988–995
Lily Adar YS, Journoa Gal, David Ayelet (2011) Pro-apoptotic peptide-polymer conjugates to induce mitochondrial-dependent cell death. Polym Adv Technol 22:199–208
Meng J, Yan Z et al (2007) High-yield expression, purification and characterization of tumor-targeted IFN-alpha2a. Cytotherapy 9(1):60–68
Ndinguri MW, Solipuram R et al (2009) Peptide targeting of platinum anti-cancer drugs. Bioconjug Chem 20(10):1869–1878
Negussie AH, Miller JL et al (2010) Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of cyclic NGR peptide targeted thermally sensitive liposome. J Control Release 143(2):265–273
Oostendorp M, Douma K et al (2008) Quantitative molecular magnetic resonance imaging of tumor angiogenesis using cNGR-labeled paramagnetic quantum dots. Cancer Res 68(18):7676–7683
Pasqualini R, Koivunen E et al (2000) Aminopeptidase N is a receptor for tumor-homing peptides and a target for inhibiting angiogenesis. Cancer Res 60(3):722–727
Petrovic N, Schacke W et al (2007) CD13/APN regulates endothelial invasion and filopodia formation. Blood 110(1):142–150
Ruggiero A, Brader P et al (2010) Different strategies for reducing intestinal background radioactivity associated with imaging HSV1-tk expression using established radionucleoside probes. Mol Imaging 9(1):47–58
Santoro A, Rimassa L et al (2010) Phase II study of NGR-hTNF, a selective vascular targeting agent, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of standard therapy. Eur J Cancer 46(15):2746–2752
Schwoppe C, Kessler T et al (2010) Tissue-factor fusion proteins induce occlusion of tumor vessels. Thromb Res 125(Suppl 2):S143–S150
van Hensbergen Y, Broxterman HJ et al (2004) Reduced growth, increased vascular area, and reduced response to cisplatin in CD13-overexpressing human ovarian cancer xenografts. Clin Cancer Res 10(3):1180–1191
van Laarhoven HW, Fiedler W et al (2010) Phase I clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study of the vascular agent NGR-hTNF in patients with advanced cancers (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study 16041). Clin Cancer Res 16(4):1315–1323
von Wallbrunn A, Waldeck J et al (2008) In vivo optical imaging of CD13/APN-expression in tumor xenografts. J Biomed Opt 13(1):011007
Wu Y, Zhang X et al (2005) Micropet imaging of glioma integrin {alpha}v{beta}3 expression using (64)Cu-labeled tetrameric RGD peptide. J Nucl Med 46(10):1707–1718
Yang YS, Zhang X et al (2006) Comparative in vitro and in vivo evaluation of two 64Cu-labeled bombesin analogs in a mouse model of human prostate adenocarcinoma. Nucl Med Biol 33(3):371–380
Yokoyama Y, Ramakrishnan S (2005) Addition of an aminopeptidase N-binding sequence to human endostatin improves inhibition of ovarian carcinoma growth. Cancer 104(2):321–331
Zhang Z, Harada H et al (2005) Aminopeptidase N/CD13 targeting fluorescent probes: synthesis and application to tumor cell imaging. Peptides 26(11):2182–2187
Zhao BJ, Ke XY et al (2011) The antiangiogenic efficacy of NGR-modified PEG-DSPE micelles containing paclitaxel (NGR-M-PTX) for the treatment of glioma in rats. J Drug Target 19(5):382–390
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 30970847, 30800275, 30970846), the Program of the National Basic Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2011CB707704), and the Major Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81090274).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Wenhui Ma and Fei Kang contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, W., Kang, F., Wang, Z. et al. 99mTc-labeled monomeric and dimeric NGR peptides for SPECT imaging of CD13 receptor in tumor-bearing mice. Amino Acids 44, 1337–1345 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-013-1469-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-013-1469-1