Abstract
Background
Displaced paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures pose a significant risk of neurovascular injury and consequently have traditionally been treated as a surgical emergency. Recently, the need for emergency surgery has been questioned. We wished to analyse our experience at a large UK tertiary paediatric trauma centre.
Methods
A retrospective case note review was performed on patients with Gartland Grades 2 and 3 supracondylar fractures observed in a 2-year period from July 2008 to July 2010. We divided children into those treated before 12 h (early surgery) and after 12 h (delayed surgery). Analysis was undertaken using Fisher’s exact test.
Results
Of the 137 patients, 115 were included in the study; median time-to-surgery was 15:30 (range 2:45–62:50); thirty-nine children were treated before 12 h and 76 patients after. In the early surgery group, three children (7.7 %) developed a superficial pin-site infection, four children (10.3 %) required open reduction, five children (12.8 %) sustained an iatrogenic nerve injury, and two children (5 %) required reoperation. In the delayed surgery group, one child (1.3 %) had a superficial pin-site infection, four children (5.3 %) required open reduction, seven children (9.2 %) sustained an iatrogenic nerve injury, and two children (2.6 %) reoperation. Bivariate analysis of our data using Fisher’s exact t test revealed no statistically significant difference between early and delayed surgery groups with regard to infection rates (p = 0.1), iatrogenic nerve injury (p = 0.53) or need for open reduction (p = 0.44).
Conclusion
Our results indicate that delayed surgery appears to offer a safe management approach in the treatment of displaced supracondylar fractures, but it is important that cases are carefully evaluated on an individual basis. These results indicate that patient transfer to a specialist paediatric centre, often with consequent surgical delay, is a safe management option and also negates the obligation to carry out these procedures at night.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Supracondylar humeral fractures are the most common type of elbow fracture in children [1–3] and usually occur in children aged 5–10 [4]. These fractures are virtually unique to the paediatric population due to the remodelling of the distal humerus that occurs in this age group, resulting in a thinner supracondylar region, with a more slender cortex [5]. The vast majority of these fractures are an extension-type injury, resulting from a fall onto an outstretched hand. Flexion-type supracondylar fractures are much rarer and result from direct trauma with the elbow joint in flexion, or a fall onto a flexed elbow.
Displaced supracondylar fractures pose a significant risk of neurovascular injury due to the complex local anatomy, and for this reason, such fractures are traditionally considered a surgical emergency. More recently, the need for emergency surgery has been debated, especially amongst children with closed fractures and an intact neurovascular supply. A lack of consensus exists in such patients with some suggesting delayed intervention is appropriate [6–10], while others continue to favour emergency intervention [11–14].
This study was sought to analyse the timing of surgery and the influence of surgical delay on patient outcome in a large UK tertiary provider of children’s orthopaedic care.
Patients and methods
A retrospective case note analysis was performed amongst patients with Gartland Grades 2 and 3 supracondylar fractures managed at our UK tertiary paediatric trauma centre. Exclusion criteria included cases treated nonoperatively, those with an absent radial pulse on Doppler examination, open fractures and incomplete records. Patients were classified according to the Gartland classification [15] based upon their radiograph at presentation. The time of admission to the initial consulting hospital was considered as a proxy for the time of injury. The time of commencement of anaesthesia was considered as the time of surgical intervention. This allowed median time-to-surgery to be determined.
All patients were treated with closed reduction and with either crossed-pin or lateral-only pin fixation with Kirschner wires. Open reduction was performed if adequate closed reduction was not achieved.
Outcomes were analysed for the rate of iatrogenic nerve injury, pin-site infection, need for open reduction and development of compartment syndrome. These perioperative complications were identified from the inpatient records and outpatient follow-up clinic letters.
Statistical analysis was conducted using a nonparametric test of association (Fisher’s exact test), with a p value <0.05 considered significant.
Results
A total of 137 patients were presented with a displaced supracondylar fracture during the study period. Twenty-two patients were excluded [16 patients were managed nonoperatively (all Gartland 2a fractures)], one child sustained an open fracture, median time-to-surgery was unable to be obtained in four patients, and one child had an absent pulse on Doppler examination. There were no cases of compartment syndrome.
Thus, 115 patients were included. Patient demographics are summarised in Table 1. Patients were divided into those treated with early surgical fixation (<12 h) or delayed surgery (>12 h), and the results were analysed using Fisher’s exact test. The median time-to-surgery was 15 h and 30 min (range 2 h, 45 min–62 h, 50 min).
In the early treatment group, three children developed a superficial pin-site infection, all of which grew Staphylococcus aureus and resolved with simple oral antibiotics. Closed reduction failed in four children who all proceeded to open reduction under the same anaesthetic; in three, soft tissue interposition between the bone ends was noted. Five children sustained an iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury, all of which had recovered by date of discharge. Two children required reoperation: one child had fracture rotation following initial reduction and fixation, and the other child was felt to have unsatisfactory position at 1-week follow-up.
In the delayed treatment group, one patient developed a superficial infection which grew pseudomonas. This was treated with wound debridement, 1 week of IV antibiotics followed by oral antibiotics for 8 weeks. Four children treated in a delayed manner required open fracture reduction, all of which were undertaken under the same anaesthetic. One child had a rotational deformity in the sagittal plane which could not be reduced by closed means, and one was noted to have the medial edge of the humerus button-holing through the medial joint capsule preventing reduction. Two children sustained an iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury, two sustained an iatrogenic nerve injury to both the median and ulnar nerves, and three children sustained iatrogenic ulnar nerve injuries. All cases of neuropraxia had resolved by discharge. Two children required reoperation: one child was noted to have fracture rotation at initial follow-up and the other child required a corrective de-rotational osteotomy for a rotational malunion.
Bivariate analysis of our data using Fisher’s exact t test revealed no statistically significant difference between early and delayed surgery groups with regard to infection rates (p = 0.10), need for open reduction (p = 0.43), iatrogenic nerve injury occurrence (p = 0.52) or need for reoperation (p = 0.60) (Table 2).
We further analysed our data by looking specifically at Grade 2 fractures and Grade 3 fractures independently. We again found no statistically significant differences between early and delayed surgery groups except that Grade 3 fractures treated within 12 h were more likely to have an infection (p = 0.03).
Discussion
The need for urgency in treating displaced supracondylar fractures is a controversial topic amongst paediatric orthopaedic surgeons. Our experience as a large UK paediatric trauma centre is that delayed surgery appears to be a safe option, although it is vitally important that each case is treated based on its individual merits, with neurovascular deficit, compartment syndrome and open fracture remaining indications for emergency intervention. In this regard, it is important that children are thoroughly assessed with respect to these indications for urgent intervention; assessment can prove challenging due to pain and the young age of these patients along with unfamiliarity of the often junior medical staff assessing these patients. To help ensure that adequate assessment is undertaken, we have previously reported on the development of an assessment proforma to ensure children with indications for emergency intervention are identified [16].
A significant proportion of displaced supracondylar fractures treated at our institution are referred from other hospitals in the area as they offered a limited paediatric orthopaedic service, with children often presenting to our institution some hours after the time of injury. This has resulted in our centre having a large number of patients treated in a delayed manner. Our results indicate that transfer to a specialist paediatric centre, often with consequent surgical delay, is a safe management option and helps ensure that surgery is undertaken by surgeons with suitable expertise in the management of these injuries.
Overall infection rate in our study was 3.5 %, comparable to other studies in the literature, [17] with no significant difference between those treated early or with delayed intervention. Likewise, rates of iatrogenic nerve injury were similar between the groups. Majority of patients in our series were treated with a crossed-pin configuration, and so it is perhaps unsurprising that the ulnar nerve was the most commonly injured nerve due to its vulnerability during placement of the medial pin.
Our results have actually shown higher proportions of complications in the early surgery group compared with the delayed surgery group, although this was not statistically significant. There are likely to be a number of factors explaining these findings: firstly, in our study, we had a higher percentage of Gartland Grade 3 fractures treated within 12 h; nevertheless, a large number of Grade 3 injuries were treated in a delayed manner, and whenever we independently analysed Grade 3 fractures, there was no significant difference in complication rates except that Grade 3 fractures treated within 12 h were more likely to develop a superficial infection (p = 0.03). Another explanatory factor was thought to be the fact that the fractures treated in an early manner were more likely to be treated by trainees, and also out-of-hours. It is well known that out-of-hours operating is known to heighten complication rates in all manner of surgical diseases due to factors such as unfamiliarity of the theatre staff and surgeon fatigue [18, 19].
In addition to the higher percentage of Gartland Grade 3 fractures treated within 12 h, other limitations of our study included the fact that a number of different surgeons were included, yet this arguably raises the generalisability of the findings, as well as the limitations of any retrospective review.
Conclusions
In conclusion, in our experience, delayed surgery appears to offer a safe management approach to the treatment of displaced supracondylar fractures. However, it is vitally important that the individual nature of each case is closely taken into account, and in this regard, it is crucial that a comprehensive evaluation is undertaken at presentation to ensure that children with indications for emergency surgery are identified. Safe delay therefore allows a safe window of transfer for children to travel to specialist centres for treatment and negates the obligation to carry out these procedures at night when complication rates are higher. The indications for emergent surgery remain vascular deficit, compartment syndrome and open fracture.
References
Houshian S, Mehdi B, Larsen MS (2001) The epidemiology of elbow fracture in children: analysis of 355 fractures, with special reference to supracondylar humerus fractures. J Orthop Sci 6:312–315
Landin LA, Danielsson LG (1986) Elbow fractures in children: an epidemiological analysis of 589 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 57:309–312
Cheng JC, Shen WY (1993) Limb fracture pattern in different pediatric age groups: a study of 3,350 children. J Orthop Trauma 7:15–22
Cheng JC, Ng BK, Ying SY, Lam PK (1999) A 10-year study of the changes in the pattern and treatment of 6,493 fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 19:344–350
Brubacher JW, Dodds SD (2008) Pediatric supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 1:190–196
Mehlman CT, Strub WM, Roy DR, Wall EJ, Crawford AH (2001) The effect of surgical timing on the perioperative complications of treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83(A):323–327
Gupta N, Kay RM, Leitch K, Femino JD, Tolo VT, Skaggs DL (2004) Effect of surgical delay on perioperative complications and need for open reduction in supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 24:245–248
Bales JG, Spencer HT, Wong MA, Fong YBS, Zionts LE, Silva M (2010) The effects of surgical delay on the outcome of pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 30:785–791
Sibinski M, Sharma H, Bennet GC (2006) Early versus delayed treatment of extension type-3 supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:380–381
Carmichael KD, Joyner K (2006) Quality of reduction versus timing of surgical intervention for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. Orthopedics 29:628–632
Walmsley PJ, Kelly MB, Robb JE, Annan IH, Porter DE (2006) Delay increases the need for open reduction of type-III supracondylar fractures of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:528–530
Ramachandran M, Skaggs DL, Crawford HA, Eastwood DM, Lalonde FD, Vitale MG, Do TT, Kay RM (2008) Delaying treatment of supracondylar fractures in children: has the pendulum swung too far? J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:1228–1233
Yildrim AO, Unal VS, Oken OF, Gulcek M, Ozsular M, Ucaner (2009) Timing of surgical treatment for type III supracondylar humerus fractures in pediatric patients. J Child Orthop 3:265–269
Loizou CL, Simillis C, Hutchinson JR (2009) A systematic review of early versus delayed treatment for type III supracondylar humeral fractures in children. Injury 40:245–248
Gartland JJ (1959) Management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Surg Gynecol Obstet 109:145–154
Mayne AIW, Perry DC, Stables G, Dhotare S, Bruce CE (2013) Documentation of neurovascular status in supracondylar fractures and the development of an assessment proforma. J Emerg Med 30:480–482
Bashyal RK, Chu JY, Schoenecker PL, Dobbs MB, Luhmann SJ, Gordon JE (2009) Complications after pinning of supracondylar distal humerus fractures. J Paediatr Orthop 29:704–708
Kelz RR, Freeman KM, Hosokawa PW, Asch DA, Spitz FR, Moskowitz M et al (2008) Time of day is associated with postoperative morbidity: an analysis of the national surgical quality improvement program data. Ann Surg 247:544–552
Komen N, Dijk J-W, Lalmahomed Z, Klop K, Hop Wim, Kleinrensink G-J et al (2009) After-hours colorectal surgery: a risk factor for anastomotic leakage. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:789–795
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mayne, A.I.W., Perry, D.C. & Bruce, C.E. Delayed surgery in displaced paediatric supracondylar fractures: a safe approach? Results from a large UK tertiary paediatric trauma centre. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24, 1107–1110 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1292-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1292-0