Abstract
Purpose
To conduct a systematic review of literature to determine risk factors and preventative measures of early and persistent dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS).
Methods
On March 2017, we searched the database PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, Clinical key, Springer link and Wiley Online Library without time restriction using the term ‘dysphagia’, ‘swallowing disorders’, and ‘anterior cervical spine surgery’. Selected papers were examined for the level of evidence by published guidelines as level I, level II, level III, level IV studies. We investigated risk factors and preventative measures of early or persistent dysphagia after ACSS from these papers.
Results
The initial search yielded 515 citations. Fifty-nine of these studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Three of them were level I evidence studies, 29 were level II evidence studies, 22 were level III evidence studies, and 3 were level IV evidence studies. Preventable risk factors included prolonged operative time, use of rhBMP, endotracheal tube cuff pressure, cervical plate type and position, dC2–C7 angle, psychiatric factors, tobacco usage, prevertebral soft tissue swelling, SLN or RLN palsy or injury of branches. Preventative measures included preoperative tracheal traction exercise, maintaining endotracheal tube cuff pressure at 20 mm Hg, avoiding routine use of rhBMP-2, use of zero-profile implant, use of Zephir plate, use of new cervical retractor, steroid application, avoiding prolonged operating time, avoiding overenlargement of cervical lordosis, decreasing surgical levels, ensuring knowledge of anatomy of superior laryngeal nerve and recurrent laryngeal nerve, to comfort always, patients quitting smoking and doctors ensuring improved skills. Unpreventable risk factors included age, gender, multilevel surgery, revision surgery, duration of preexisting pain, BMI, blood loss, upper levels, preoperative comorbidities and surgical type.
Conclusion
Adequate preoperative preparation of the patients including preoperative tracheal traction exercise and quitting smoking, proper preventative measures during surgery including maintaining endotracheal tube cuff pressure at 20 mm Hg, avoiding routine use of rhBMP-2, use of zero-profile implant, use of Zephir plate, use of new cervical retractor, steroid application, avoiding prolonged operating time, avoiding overenlargement of cervical lordosis and decreasing surgical levels, doctors ensuring knowledge of anatomy, improved surgical techniques and to comfort always are essential for preventing early and persistent dysphagia after ACSS.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS) is commonly used for the treatment of numerous cervical disorders, such as traumatic, degenerative and congenital diseases [1, 2]. Dysphagia is one of the most common complications after ACSS that occurs frequently. Previous studies observed that dysphagia easily occurred in the early postoperative stage with reported incidence of up to 88%, and its symptoms were particularly serious in the early phase [1, 3,4,5,6]. Persistent dysphagia could lead to not eating or drinking normally and troubled the patients for a long time [38]. Knowing risk factors and preventative measures of early and persistent dysphagia after ACSS become an important work for the spine surgeons when doing the procedure.
Materials and methods
In March 2017, we searched the database PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, Clinical key, Springer link and Wiley Online Library without time restriction using the terms ‘dysphagia’, ‘swallowing disorders’ and ‘anterior cervical spine surgery’ looking for papers published in English that reported risk factors and preventative measures of early or persistent dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery.
The search produced a total of 515 published articles (Fig. 1). Abstracts were reviewed and included if dysphagia was a reported patient outcome measure and if the study investigated risk factors and prevention of early or persistent dysphagia after ACSS. Exclusion criteria included case reports, case series, reviews, commentaries, and cadaveric or experimental studies in animals. Fifty-nine articles including 32 prospective and 27 retrospective studies were included in this systematic review (Table 1). Level of evidence ratings were assigned to each article independently by two reviewers (J. L., N. K.) using published guidelines [69].
Results
We evaluated 59 studies, three of them were level I evidence studies, 29 were level II evidence studies, 22 were level III evidence studies, and 3 were level IV evidence studies. Preventable risk factors and preventative measures are described in Table 2. Unpreventable risk factors are described in Table 3. The evaluated articles are described in the following.
Preventable risk factors and preventative measures
Prolonged operative time
Twelve studies investigated whether prolonged operated time was a risk factor for early or persistent dysphagia. Four studies including two prospective and two retrospective studies observed it as a risk factor, while eight studies including three prospective and five retrospective studies did not find a significant correlation.
Liu et al. [1] found that operative time is the risk factor for dysphagia during the first day (p = 0.009) to the second day (p = 0.017) after ACSS. Kalb et al. [5] found that operative time tended to be longer in those who developed dysphagia (186 vs 169 min). Rihn et al. [7] also found a correlation between operative time and the severity of dysphagia after 12 weeks of one- or two-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) in their prospective study (p = 0.04). Riley et al. [8] reported in a retrospective analysis that the risk of persistent dysphagia increased as the duration of surgery increased after ACDF.
On the other hand, some studies [3, 9,10,11,12,13,14,15] failed to find prolonged operative time to be a significant risk factor.
Use of BMP
There are two forms of BMP: recombinant human BMP-2 (rhBMP-2) and BMP-7 [16]. Three prospective and six retrospective studies relating the use of BMP and dysphagia after ACSS were found.
Cole et al. [17] found that rhBMP use was associated with an increased risk of dysphagia within 30 days postoperatively (OR = 1.3, 95% CI 1.1–1.5). Jain et al. [18] also found that use of rhBMP was significantly associated with the development of dysphagia after ACSS [prevalence, 2.0%; adjusted odds radio (OR), 1.53]. Fineberg et al. [16] also observed a significantly higher rate of dysphagia when BMP was utilized during ACDF (37.2 vs 22.5 per 1000 cases; p < 0.0005). Buttermann et al. [19] concluded that the use of BMP did result in increased dysphagia of patients who had primary one- to three-level ACDF with iliac-crest bone autograft. Lu et al. [20] also found the use of rhBMP-2 significantly increased the severity of dysphagia in patients undergoing 2-level ACDF (p < 0.005). Burkus et al. [21] observed high rates of dysphagia at 24 months after single-level allograft when rhBMP-2 was used (p = 0.001).
Lovasik et al. [12] found no difference in dysphagia incidence between rhBMP-2 or beta-tricalcium phosphate (bTCP) groups of patients who underwent ACDF with polyetheretherketone plastic fusion spacers during a 2-year period in their retrospective study (20 vs 17%, p = 0.5).
Endotracheal tube cuff pressure and cervical retractors
Five prospective studies investigated whether endotracheal tube cuff pressure was a risk factor for early and persistent dysphagia after ACSS. Three of them considered endotracheal tube cuff pressure (ETCP) as a risk factor and suggested decreasing ETCP or using dynamic retractors to prevent dysphagia after ACSS.
Ratnaraj et al. [22] reported that an increased ECTP during neck retraction and a prolonged retraction time were risk factors of postoperative dysphagia at 24 h (p < 0.05, r 2 = 0.61). They suggested that decreasing ETCP to 20 mmHg may be helpful in improving patient comfort following ACSS. Pattavilakom et al. [23] performed a prospective randomized clinical trail to compare the conventional Cloward-style retractor (CRS) with a novel seek retractor system (SRS) after 1- to 2-level ACDF. This study found that average retraction pressure and mean average peak retraction pressure with SRS were all lower than that with CRS (p < 0.001). Mendoza-lattes [24] reported that patients with dysphagia had a significantly higher average intraluminal pressure as well as significantly lower average mucosal perfusion secondary to retraction (p < 0.0001). They suggested that dynamic retraction associates with a lower prevalence of postoperative dysphagia.
Although three level II evidence studies investigated endotracheal tube cuff pressure as a risk factor of early and persistent dysphagia after ACSS, there were still two studies that did not find a correlation between them. Papavero et al. [25] found no correlation between the amount of retraction and early postoperative dysphagia after ACSS in their prospective study. Kowalczyk et al. [26] found decreasing ETCP to 15 mm Hg during surgery had no effect on the prevalence of dysphagia after ACSS (p > 0.05).
Use of plating, plate profile and prominence
Four studies including two prospective and two retrospective studies investigated whether using cervical plate or plate profile and position correlated with early or persistent dysphagia after ACSS. Five studies suggested using Zero-P implant and one study suggested using smaller and smoother profile plate to prevent early and persistent dysphagia.
Zeng et al. [3] observed that use of plate was one of the risk factors of early dysphagia after ACSS (p = 0.012). They also found a bigger protrusion about 1.4 mm in the dysphagia group (p < 0.001). Lee et al. [27] suggested that the use of a smaller and smoother profile plate does reduce the incidence of early and persistent dysphagia after ACSS.
But Jain et al. [18] and Chin et al. [28] failed to find a correlation between plate profile or prominence and postoperative dysphagia.
Miao et al. [29] performed a prospective study to analyze the primary efficacy and safety of a new zero-profile implant (Zero-P) in Chinese population compared with a control group of patients using anterior titanium plate. The authors reported similar clinical and radiographic outcomes of the two groups. But the incidence of dysphagia was lower and the symptom duration was much shorter in the Zero-P group. Three other studies [30,31,32] also found that using Zero-P can reduce the incidence of early dysphagia in their retrospective studies, whereas Vanekn et al. [33] didn’t find significant difference in the incidence of dysphagia between Zero-P interbody spacer and standard interbody spacer.
dC2–C7 angle
The C2–C7 angle was defined as the angle between the lines parallel to the inferior end plate of C2 and C7 vertebral bodies (Cobb’s method). dC2–C7 angle = postoperative C2–C7 angle – preoperative C2–C7 angle [14]. Three studies including two prospective and one retrospective studies investigated dC2–C7 angle as a risk factor of early or persistent dysphagia after ACSS.
Liu et al. [1] found that the dC2–C7 angle significantly associated with early dysphagia from the third to the fifth day after ACSS and when the dC2–C7 angle was greater than 9°, the incidence of dysphagia was significantly increased (p < 0.05). Two other studies [13, 34] also found that when the dC2–C7 angle was greater than 5°, the chance of developing dysphagia was significantly greater. Furthermore, Chen et al. [35] found that dC2–C7 angle was also a risk factor for combined anterior–posterior cervical spine surgery (p = 0.020).
Psychiatric factors
Kang et al. [36] performed a prospective study to identify associations between psychiatric factors and the development of dysphagia 1 year after single-level ACDF. Multivariate logistic regression showed that the psychiatric problem prior to surgery was the risk factor of persistent dysphagia (p = 0.005). They suggested that patients with a psychiatric factor should be counseled before surgery.
But Riley et al. [8] did not find significant relationship between psychiatric factors and dysphagia at 6 and 12 months after ACSS (p > 0.05).
Tobacco usage
Two prospective studies considered tobacco usage as a risk factor of early or persistent dysphagia after ACSS. Siska et al. [37] analyzed that increased degree of dysphagia was associated with tobacco usage 3 weeks after surgery (p = 0.002). Olsson et al. [38] found that the increased prevalence of dysphagia in smokers (38 vs 21%) trended toward statistical significance and the severity of dysphagia was more severe for smokers (p = 0.02).
There are still three other studies [3, 5, 39] that did not find a correlation between tobacco usage and postoperative dysphagia.
Prevertebral soft tissue swelling
Shi et al. [34] reported prevertebral soft tissue swelling (PSTS) change greater than 5 mm was prone to have early postoperative dysphagia (p = 0.000). Riley et al. [8] also found PSTS relating to dysphagia after ACDF in their retrospective study.
But Kang et al. [9] observed no statistically significant difference between PSTS and dysphagia at 1, 3, and 6 months after ACSS (p > 0.05). Kepler et al. [40] found that the degree of dysphagia had no correlation with postoperative dysphagia after 1- to 2-level ACDF (p > 0.05).
Song et al. [41] and Lee et al. [42] found that prevertebral soft tissue swelling as well as postoperative dysphagia reduced significantly with steroid administration during ACSS. But Nam et al. [43] failed to find the correlation between PSTS decrease and steroid application.
SLN or RLN palsy or injury of branches
Two studies [44, 45] considered superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) or recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy or injury of branches as risk factor for dysphagia after ACSS. Tervonen et al. [44] suggested RLN should be detected during surgery. Razfar et al. [46] suggested spine surgeons to ensure knowledge of normal and aberrant courses of the SLN and RLN.
Unpreventable risk factors
Age
Seventeen studies including 6 prospective and 11 retrospective studies investigated whether age was a risk factor. Six studies including two prospective studies [12, 15] and four retrospective studies [3, 4, 12, 39] identified old age as a risk factor. Eleven studies including four prospective studies [1, 7, 37, 38] and seven retrospective studies [8, 13, 14, 35, 47,48,49] did not find a significant correlation.
Gender
Eighteen studies including eight prospective and ten retrospective studies investigated whether gender was a risk factor. Six studies including five prospective studies [10, 11, 25, 28, 37] and one retrospective study [3] identified female as a risk factor and one retrospective study [4] identified male as a risk factor. Eleven studies including three prospective studies [1, 27, 39] and eight retrospective studies [8, 12,13,14, 35, 47,48,49] did not find a significant correlation.
Multilevel surgery
Fourteen studies including 3 prospective and 11 retrospective studies investigated whether multilevel surgery was a risk factor. Nine studies including one prospective study [10] and eight retrospective studies [3,4,5, 8, 9, 47,48,49] identified multilevel surgery as a risk factor. Five studies including two prospective studies [14, 27] and three retrospective studies [12, 38, 50] did not find a significant correlation.
Revision surgery
Seven studies including three prospective and four retrospective studies investigated whether revision surgery was a risk factor. Two studies including one prospective study [38] and one retrospective study [50] identified revision surgery as a risk factor. Five studies including two prospective studies [14, 27] and three retrospective studies [11, 13, 47] did not find a significant correlation.
Duration of preexisting pain
Three studies including two prospective studies and one retrospective study investigated whether duration of preexisting pain was a risk factor. Two studies including one prospective study [39] and one retrospective study [8] identified duration of preexisting pain as a risk factor, while one prospective study [38] did not find a significant correlation.
BMI
Nine studies including five prospective and four retrospective studies investigated whether higher BMI was a risk factor. Four studies including two prospective studies [11, 25] and two retrospective studies [5, 50] identified higher BMI as a risk factor. Five studies including three prospective studies [1, 7, 39] and two retrospective studies [13, 37] did not find a significant correlation.
Blood loss
Five studies including one prospective and four retrospective studies investigated whether blood loss was a risk factor. One prospective study [39] identified blood loss as a risk factor. Four retrospective studies [3, 35] did not find a significant correlation.
Upper levels
Fourteen studies including six prospective and eight retrospective studies investigated whether upper levels were a risk factor. Eight studies including two prospective studies [28, 51] and six retrospective studies [5, 9, 12, 35, 47, 49] identified upper level surgeries as a risk factor. Five studies including four prospective studies [10, 11, 37, 40] and one retrospective study [8] did not find a significant correlation.
One retrospective study [52] considered dysphagia a more common clinical problem after ACDF in the mid cervical spine.
Preoperative comorbidities
Two studies [4, 37] investigated preoperative comorbidities such as chronic lung disease and diabetes as a significant risk factor. But they did not give a suggestion whether controlling the preoperative comorbidities could reduce dysphagia after surgery. Two studies [3, 12] failed to find a relationship between preoperative comorbidities and the incidence of dysphagia.
ACDF versus cervical disk replacement
Three studies [1, 4, 53] investigated the incidence of dysphagia between ACDF and cervical disk replacement, they reported lower incidence of dysphagia in the cervical disk replacement group.
Discussion
Several risk factors may lead to early or persistent dysphagia after ACSS, some of them are unpreventable, and some of them are preventable. Although some studies had different conclusions, we do find some preventative measures to reduce postoperative dysphagia.
As we know, if the esophagus and prevertebral soft tissue were retracted for a long time during the surgery, they would be injured and result in severe swelling [40]. The swelling of esophagus and prevertebral soft tissue finally led to patient dysphagia. However, it is likely that multilevel surgeries took longer operative time than single-level surgeries [8]. It still remains controversial that whether prolonged operative time was a risk factor, but avoiding a prolonged operative time and improving surgical techniques do help to prevent dysphagia after ACSS. Avoiding a prolonged operative time could reduce the injury to the prevertebral soft tissue [1]. In complex cervical cases in which a long operative time is predicted, senior surgeons with improved surgical techniques would probably have less dysphagia after surgery than fellows and residents [54].
One of the potential mechanisms leading to dysphagia after BMP use is increasing the incidence of swelling after ACSS [55]. Therefore, spine surgeons should avoid routine use of BMP except for patients who underwent revision surgery or at high risk for pseudarthrosis. For these patients, depomedrol is supposed to be administered locally [12]. Fineberg et al. [16] recommended that if BMP is to be used in ACDF, the patients should be clinically monitored for dysphagia in the early postoperative period. Edwards et al. [56] performed a prospective randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trail and found that patients receiving depomedrol experienced decreased dysphagia incidence and magnitude at all time intervals (p < 0.05). This study provided level I evidence that locally administered depomedrol on a collagen sponge could significantly decrease postoperative dysphagia following ACDF using low-dose BMP-2.
Arts et al. [57] protocoled a double-blind randomized controlled trial to determine whether adjusting ETCP after placement of a retractor during ACSS would prevent postoperative dysphagia after ACSS. Recruitment of patients had started in December 2011 and would be finished at the end of 2013. The results of this level I evidence study may lead to standard adjustment of ETCP in every patient undergoing ACSS to decrease postoperative morbidity, and now we are still waiting for the result of this study. Chen et al. [58] considered that if ETCP was reduced, the surgical field would become narrow and operations would become more difficult to perform. Therefore, they designed a preoperative tracheal traction exercise (TTE) to prevent dysphagia after ACSS. The TTE was performed twice per day, 15 counts each time, for 3 days, starting 4 days before the surgery.
Anterior plating may be responsible for higher rates of early and persistent dysphagia because of the plate’s mass effect on the adjacent esophagus and because contralateral screw placement requires more retraction past the midline than is necessary when a plate is not used [40]. In addition, scar tissue formation on a less smooth plate surface may lead to postoperative dysphagia [27]. Although most studies suggested using smaller and smoother plates or Zero-P implant to prevent early and persistent dysphagia after ACSS, better designed, especially level I, studies are required to clarify this issue.
The overenlargement of cervical lordosis may lead to bulging of the posterior pharyngeal wall, which may reduce pharyngeal space, and influence the normal process of pharyngeal squeeze and laryngeal elevation. Thus, overcorrecting the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine may increase the dysphagia rate [34]. Tian et al. [13] suggested that overenlargement of cervical lordosis should be avoided to reduce the development of postoperative dysphagia.
How psychiatric problem increased the incidence of dysphagia was unexplained, these patients tended to overreport their symptoms of dysphagia [36]. Further studies are required to study the relationship between psychiatric factors and dysphagia after ACSS, and patients with a psychiatric factor should be counseled before surgery as the medical ethics told “to comfort always” [59].
Although two studies observed tobacco usage as a risk factor of early and persistent dysphagia after ACSS, they did not give a suggestion to quit smoking to prevent postoperative dysphagia. Olsson et al. [38] found that there was no difference between those who never smoked and those who formerly smoked of postoperative dysphagia, which may indicate that quitting smoking could help to decrease dysphagia after ACSS. Further studies are required to determine the effect of smoking in postoperative dysphagia.
Suk et al. [60] reported the natural change of PSTS in the early postoperative period. PSTS was increased continuously from the 2nd day and reached a plateau on the 3rd day postoperatively. A gradual decrease was starting at the 4th day after surgery. Whether steroid administration can decrease PSTS remains controversial, but it could prevent and reduce early postoperative dysphagia. Four randomized controlled trails [41, 42, 61, 62], one of which is a double-blinded study [61], found that steroid administration significantly improved swallowing function and reduced dysphagia in the early postoperative period.
Haller et al. [63, 64] explained the clinical anatomy of SLN during ACSS to help us ensure knowledge of them.
Conclusion
Adequate preoperative preparation of the patients including preoperative tracheal traction exercise and quit smoking, properly preventative measures during surgery including maintaining endotracheal tube cuff pressure at 20 mm Hg, avoiding routine use of rhBMP-2, use of zero-profile implant, use of Zephir plate, use of new cervical retractor, steroid application, avoiding prolonged operating time, avoiding overenlargement of cervical lordosis and decreasing surgical levels, doctors ensuring knowledge of anatomy, improving surgical techniques and to comfort always are essential for preventing early and persistent dysphagia after ACSS.
References
Liu JM et al (2017) The incidences and risk factors related to early dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study. PLoS One 12(3):e0173364
Riley LH 3rd et al (2010) Postoperative dysphagia in anterior cervical spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(9 Suppl):S76–S85
Zeng JH, Zhong ZM, Chen JT (2013) Early dysphagia complicating anterior cervical spine surgery: incidence and risk factors. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(8):1067–1071
Singh K et al (2013) Incidence and risk factors for dysphagia after anterior cervical fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(21):1820–1825
Kalb S et al (2012) Dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: incidence and risk factors. World Neurosurg 77(1):183–187
Campbell PG et al (2010) Early complications related to approach in cervical spine surgery: single-center prospective study. World Neurosurg 74(2–3):363–368
Rihn JA et al (2011) What is the incidence and severity of dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(3):658–665
Riley LH 3rd et al (2005) Dysphagia after anterior cervical decompression and fusion: prevalence and risk factors from a longitudinal cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(22):2564–2569
Kang SH et al (2011) Multi-level spinal fusion and postoperative prevertebral thickness increase the risk of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery. J Clin Neurosci 18(10):1369–1373
Bazaz R, Lee MJ, Yoo JU (2002) Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(22):2453–2458
Lee MJ et al (2007) Risk factors for dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a two-year prospective cohort study. Spine J 7(2):141–147
Lovasik BP et al (2017) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparison of fusion, dysphagia, and complication rates between recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 and beta-tricalcium phosphate. World Neurosurg 97:674
Tian W, Yu J (2016) The role of C2–C7 angle in the development of dysphagia after anterior and posterior cervical spine surgery. Clin Spine Surg. doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000000493
Tian W, Yu J (2013) The role of C2–C7 and O–C2 angle in the development of dysphagia after cervical spine surgery. Dysphagia 28(2):131–138
Smith-Hammond CA et al (2004) Prospective analysis of incidence and risk factors of dysphagia in spine surgery patients: comparison of anterior cervical, posterior cervical, and lumbar procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(13):1441–1446
Fineberg SJ et al (2013) Hospital outcomes and complications of anterior and posterior cervical fusion with bone morphogenetic protein. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(15):1304–1309
Cole T et al (2014) Usage of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein in cervical spine procedures: analysis of the MarketScan longitudinal database. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(17):1409–1416
Jain A et al (2014) rhBMP use in cervical spine surgery: associated factors and in-hospital complications. J Bone Jt Surg Am 96(8):617–623
Buttermann GR (2008) Prospective nonrandomized comparison of an allograft with bone morphogenic protein versus an iliac-crest autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine J 8(3):426–435
Lu DC, Tumialan LM, Chou D (2013) Multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with and without rhBMP-2: a comparison of dysphagia rates and outcomes in 150 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 18(1):43–49
Burkus JK et al. (2016) Clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients undergoing single-level anterior cervical arthrodesis: a prospective trial comparing allograft to a reduced dose of rhBMP-2. Clin Spine Surg. doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000000409
Ratnaraj J et al (2002) Effects of decreasing endotracheal tube cuff pressures during neck retraction for anterior cervical spine surgery. J Neurosurg 97(2 Suppl):176–179
Pattavilakom A, Seex KA (2011) Results of a prospective randomized study comparing a novel retractor with a Caspar retractor in anterior cervical surgery. Neurosurgery 69(2 Suppl Operative):ons156–ons160 (discussion ons160)
Mendoza-Lattes S et al (2008) Dysphagia following anterior cervical arthrodesis is associated with continuous, strong retraction of the esophagus. J Bone Jt Surg Am 90(2):256–263
Papavero L et al (2007) The impact of esophagus retraction on early dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery: does a correlation exist? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(10):1089–1093
Kowalczyk I et al (2015) Reduced endotracheal tube cuff pressure to assess dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 28(10):E552–E558
Lee MJ et al (2005) Influence of anterior cervical plate design on Dysphagia: a 2-year prospective longitudinal follow-up study. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(5):406–409
Chin KR, Eiszner JR, Adams SB Jr (2007) Role of plate thickness as a cause of dysphagia after anterior cervical fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(23):2585–2590
Miao J et al (2013) Early follow-up outcomes of a new zero-profile implant used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 26(5):E193–E197
Qi M et al (2013) The use of a zero-profile device compared with an anterior plate and cage in the treatment of patients with symptomatic cervical spondylosis: a preliminary clinical investigation. Bone Joint J 95-b(4):543–547
Hofstetter CP, Kesavabhotla K, Boockvar JA (2015) Zero-profile anchored spacer reduces rate of dysphagia compared with ACDF with anterior plating. J Spinal Disord Tech 28(5):E284–E290
Liu Y et al (2016) Comparison of a zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with an anterior plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 25(6):1881–1890
Vanek P et al (2013) Anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine with Zero-P spacer: prospective comparative study-clinical and radiological results at a minimum 2 years after surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(13):E792–E797
Shi S et al (2016) Risk factors for dysphagia after single-level anterior cervical decompression with arthroplasty or fusion: a prospective study comparing 2 Zero-profile implants. World Neurosurg 95:148–155
Chen CJ et al (2013) Dysphagia following combined anterior-posterior cervical spine surgeries. J Neurosurg Spine 19(3):279–287
Kang SS et al (2014) The association between psychiatric factors and the development of chronic dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery. Eur Spine J 23(8):1694–1698
Siska PA et al (2011) Dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study using the swallowing-quality of life questionnaire and analysis of patient comorbidities. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(17):1387–1391
Olsson EC, Jobson M, Lim MR (2015) Risk factors for persistent dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery. Orthopedics 38(4):e319–e323
Fehlings MG et al (2012) Perioperative and delayed complications associated with the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy based on 302 patients from the AOSpine North America Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Study. J Neurosurg Spine 16(5):425–432
Kepler CK et al (2012) Dysphagia and soft-tissue swelling after anterior cervical surgery: a radiographic analysis. Spine J 12(8):639–644
Song KJ et al (2014) The clinical efficacy of short-term steroid treatment in multilevel anterior cervical arthrodesis. Spine J 14(12):2954–2958
Lee SH et al (2011) Effect of retropharyngeal steroid on prevertebral soft tissue swelling following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(26):2286–2292
Nam TW et al (2013) Effect of intravenous dexamethasone on prevertebral soft tissue swelling after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Acta Orthop Belg 79(2):211–215
Tervonen H et al (2007) Dysphonia and dysphagia after anterior cervical decompression. J Neurosurg Spine 7(2):124–130
Netterville JL et al (1996) Vocal fold paralysis following the anterior approach to the cervical spine. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 105(2):85–91
Razfar A et al (2012) Prevention and management of dysphonia during anterior cervical spine surgery. Laryngoscope 122(10):2179–2183
Mehra S et al (2014) Factors predictive of voice and swallowing outcomes after anterior approaches to the cervical spine. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 150(2):259–265
Danto J et al (2012) Multiple cervical levels: increased risk of dysphagia and dysphonia during anterior cervical discectomy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 24(4):350–355
Wu B, Song F, Zhu S (2016) Reasons of dysphagia after operation of anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Clin Spine Surg 30(5):E554–E559. doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000000180
Leckie S et al (2016) Perioperative complications of cervical spine surgery: analysis of a prospectively gathered database through the association for collaborative spinal research. Global Spine J 6(7):640–649
Fengbin Y et al (2013) Dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective study comparing two anterior surgical approaches. Eur Spine J 22(5):1147–1151
Carucci LR, Turner MA, Yeatman CF (2015) Dysphagia secondary to anterior cervical fusion: radiologic evaluation and findings in 74 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204(4):768–775
McAfee PC et al (2010) Lower incidence of dysphagia with cervical arthroplasty compared with ACDF in a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Spinal Disord Tech 23(1):1–8
Joaquim AF et al (2014) Dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a systematic review of potential preventative measures. Spine J 14(9):2246–2260
Vaidya R et al (2007) Complications of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Eur Spine J 16(8):1257–1265
Edwards CC 2nd et al (2016) Can dysphagia following anterior cervical fusions with rhBMP-2 be reduced with local depomedrol application? a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled. Double-blind trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41(7):555–562
Arts MP et al (2013) Maintaining endotracheal tube cuff pressure at 20 mm Hg to prevent dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery; protocol of a double-blind randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14:280
Chen Z et al (2012) Tracheal traction exercise reduces the occurrence of postoperative dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(15):1292–1296
Smith HL (1987) Medical ethics in the primary care setting. Soc Sci Med 25(6):705–709
Suk KS et al (2006) Prevertebral soft tissue swelling after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate fixation. Int Orthop 30(4):290–294
Jeyamohan SB et al (2015) Effect of steroid use in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg Spine 23(2):137–143
Pedram M et al (2003) Pharyngolaryngeal lesions in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery through the anterior approach: contribution of methylprednisolone. Eur Spine J 12(1):84–90
Haller JM, Iwanik M, Shen FH (2011) Clinically relevant anatomy of high anterior cervical approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(25):2116–2121
Haller JM, Iwanik M, Shen FH (2012) Clinically relevant anatomy of recurrent laryngeal nerve. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(2):97–100
Jang JW, Park JH, Rhim SC (2014) Does plate profile affect postoperative dysphagia following anterior cervical spine surgery? J Clin Neurosci 21(1):78–81
Njoku I Jr et al (2014) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device: a clinical and radiological study: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 21(4):529–537
Reinard KA et al (2016) A cohort study of the morbidity of combined anterior-posterior cervical spinal fusions: incidence and predictors of postoperative dysphagia. Eur Spine J 25(7):2068–2077
Tumialan LM et al (2008) The safety and efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with polyetheretherketone spacer and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a review of 200 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 8(6):529–535
Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD (2003) Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 85:1–3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, J., Hai, Y., Kang, N. et al. Risk factors and preventative measures of early and persistent dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 27, 1209–1218 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5311-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5311-4