Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Erratum to: J Gastroenterol (2013) 48:874–883 DOI 10.1007/s00535-012-0685-x
Please note that there are errors in this article:
The first sentence in the legend for Fig. 2 appeared incorrectly. The sentence should read as follows:
Fig. 2 Differences in the electrical flow routes of a the bipolar (CelonPOWER System) and b the monopolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) systems.
In Fig. 4, in the next-to-last step on the right side of the flowchart, the correct number of weeks in the follow-up period should be 24, not 20. The correct figure should be shown as follows:
In addition, in the legend for Table 3, the symbol “>” was incorrect; it should have been “≥”. The correct legend should be shown as follows:
Table 3 Frequently observed adverse effects (5 % or more) (adverse reactions at an incidence of ≥5 % in the overall study period).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s00535-012-0685-x.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Osaki, Y., Ikeda, K., Izumi, N. et al. Erratum to: Clinical effectiveness of bipolar radiofrequency ablation for small liver cancers. J Gastroenterol 48, 1308–1309 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-013-0874-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-013-0874-2