Abstract
Among the digenetic trematodes, paramphistomes are known to be the causative agent of “amphistomiasis” or the stomach fluke disease of domestic and wild animals, mainly ruminants. The use of 28S (divergent domains) and 18S rRNA for phylogenetic inference is significantly warranted for these flukes since it is as yet limited to merely the exploration of the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) region. The present study intended to explore the divergent domains (D1–D3) of 28S rRNA and simultaneously equate the phylogenetic information with 18S rRNA in paramphistomes. Divergence of the 28S rRNA domains was evident amongst the divergent (D) domains, where D1 domain emerged as the most variable and D2, the most robust domain, since the latter could provide a higher resolution of the species. D2 was the only domain that comprised compensatory mutations in the helices of its structural constraints; this domain is thus well suited for species distinction and may be considered a potential DNA barcode complementary to mitochondrial DNA. 28S (D1 + D2 + D3) rRNA provided a significant resolution of the taxa corroborating with the taxonomy of these flukes and thus proved to be more robust as a phylogenetic marker for lower levels than 18S rRNA. Phylogenetic inferences of paramphitomes are still scarcely explored; additional data from other taxa belonging to this family may estimate better the biodiversity of these flukes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Paramphistomes are known to be the causal agents of an incapacitating disease called amphistomiasis especially in ruminants (Sey 1991). In recent times, the disease has emerged as a significant root cause of productivity loss (Anuracpreeda et al. 2008). Death rates due to immature paramphistomid flukes can be as high as 80–90 % in domesticated ruminants in some foci of infection (Juyal et al. 2003; Ilha et al. 2005; Khan et al. 2008). The disease has been reported in subtropical and tropical areas, where the infection leads to economic losses related to mortality and low productivity (Chethanon et al. 1985; Prasitirat et al. 1997; Kilani et al. 2003). Of the 31 species of digenetic flukes reported so far from cattle, buffalo, goat, sheep, and pig in the northeastern region of India, 25 species represent the amphistome group (Roy and Tandon 1992). Of the various families under the superfamily Paramphistomoidea Fischoeder 1901, only four, viz., Paramphistomidae (comprising Paramphistominae and Orthocoeliinae subfamilies), Olveriidae, Gastrodiscidae, and Gastrothylacidae are represented in the mammalian hosts in Northeast India. Members of the superfamily Paramphistomoidea are digeneans described most perceptibly by the absence of an oral sucker and by the position of the ventral sucker, or acetabulum, at or close to the posterior extremity of the body in both adults and cercariae. The families Paramphistomidae, Olveriidae, and Gastrodiscidae, are restricted to paramphistomoid digeneans, parasitic in mammals, which lack pharyngeal sacs, a cirrus sac, and a ventral pouch (Jones 2005a). The identification of various species of the family Paramphistomidae is rather difficult from a systematic point of view (Mage et al. 2002). Species identification based on assessment of the internal form is made more inexact due to the thick tegument of the parasites (Jones 1990) and the fact that traits used for their characterization include the tedious histological studies of their muscular structures—the phaynx, the acetabulum, and the terminal genitalium (Sey 1991). Such difficulties in establishing the identification of these species could account for conflicting reports of the pathogenicity of amphistomes (Sanabria and Romero 2008). As an alternative to these classical approaches, a more adept choice would be the use of molecular tools (usually DNA sequencing) that allows a speedy and précised identification of genetically diverse but morphologically similar species (Nolan and Cribb 2005). An assortment of genetic markers is now available to detect polymorphisms in nuclear DNA. Ribosomal genes and their related spacers are among the most versatile sequences for phylogenetic analysis (Hershkovitz and Lewis 1996; Coleman 2000, 2003; Coleman and Vacquier 2002; Álvarez and Wendel 2003; Müller et al. 2007; Wickramasinghe et al. 2009; Yan et al. 2013). The large subunit ribosomal DNA (LSU or 28S rRNA), which is a mosaic of several variable and conservative fragments, is often regarded as a phylogenetic marker. Currently, the usage of 28S rRNA and small subunit (SSU or 18S rRNA) has provided a more gravid resolution among the Metazoa (Medina et al. 2001). The 28S rRNA region of eukaryotes consists of 12 divergent domains or expansion segments, which differ greatly in nucleotide composition as well as length among species (Hassouna et al. 1984; De Rijk et al. 1995). Consequently, the region has been widely used for resolving species phylogenies of Digenea as well (Kaukas et al. 1994; Snyder and Tkach 2001; Tkach et al. 2001; Leon-Regagnon and Paredes-Calderon 2002). Nevertheless, the information regarding the 28S and 18S rRNA regions of paramphistomes is still very scanty; a few workers have exploited only the common genetic marker, i.e., the second internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) to describe these flukes (Itagaki et al. 2003; Rinaldi et al. 2005; Goswami et al. 2009; Lotfy et al. 2010; Shylla et al. 2011; Ghatani et al. 2012). The role of rRNA secondary structure has progressively been used to infer phylogenetic study through reconstructing optimal alignment, the “morphological” information of the molecule as a supplementary source of data and refining appropriate models of evolution of the molecule (Coleman 2003, 2007; Subbotin et al. 2007; Thornhill et al. 2007). Besides, the phylogenetic implications of compensatory base changes (CBCs) are defined as “mutations that occur in both nucleotides of a paired structural position while retaining the paired nucleotide bond” (Ruhl et al. 2009) in rRNA secondary structure of 28S rRNA have also been studied by few workers (Wheeler and Honeycutt, 1988; Dixon and Hillis 1993; Chilton et al. 2003). As yet, the secondary structures of the divergent domains of the 28S rRNA region of paramphistomes are still unexplored.
The present study intended to determine the nucleotide differences in the divergent domains (D1, D2, and D3) of 28S rRNA and to ascertain which domains contain informative genetic markers for phylogenetic studies, and to quantify the presence of CBCs that may occur in the secondary structures of the D domains. Thus, in the present study, we assembled 12 species (belonging to eight genera) of paramphistomes in order to assess the degree of variation in the domains of 28S rRNA and furthermore used the informative sequences of 18S rRNA to supplement the findings retrieved from the 28S rRNA data.
Materials and methods
Specimen collection and DNA isolation
Live flukes were collected from various local abattoirs that were situated in different collection sites in various states of Northeast India, viz., Shillong, Jowai, Nongstoin, and Tura (Meghalaya), Dharmanagar (Tripura), and Kohima (Nagaland) (Table 1). The identification of these parasites was performed based on comparisons of morphological features with the voucher specimens mentioned in Table 1. DNA was isolated from the individual flukes using a standard phenol-chloroform technique (Sambrook et al. 1989). The 5’ end of the 28S rRNA gene containing the D1–D3 variable domains was amplified using forward primer dig12 (5′-AAG CAT ATC ACT AAG CGG-3′) with the reverse primer 1500R (5′-GCT ATC CTG AGG GAA ACT TCG-3′) (Tkach et al. 2000). 18S rRNA was amplified using forward primer EukA (5′-AACCCGTTGAACCCCATT-3′) and reverse primer EukB (5′-CCATCCAATCGGTAGTAGCG-3′) (Díez et al. 2001). The thermal gradient of both these marker regions started with an initial denaturation at 95 °C (5 min), annealing at 56 °C (2 min), and final extension at 72 °C (10 min). The resultant PCR products were separated by electrophoresis through 1.6 % (w/v) agarose gels in TAE buffer, stained with ethidium bromide, transilluminated under ultraviolet light, and then photographed. For DNA sequencing, the PCR products were purified using Genei Quick PCR purification Kit and sequenced in both directions using an automated sequencer by DNA sequencing services of Macrogen, Korea.
Sequence alignment and analysis
DNA Baser v3.5.3 (http://www.dnabaser.com/) was used to create contigs by assembling forward and reverse sequences of 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA genes, since the full length of these genes could not be retrieved from one-direction sequencing. Boundaries of variable domains of 28S rRNA and 18S rRNA were adjusted manually with the previously aligned sequence of Schistosoma mansoni using Bioedit v7.2.0 (Hall 1999). Gaps were treated as missing data.
Phylogenetic tree construction
Phylogenetic analyses were performed using Bayesian Inference (BI) (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003). The BI analysis of the individual divergent domains of 28S rRNA, concatenated dataset (D1 + D2 + D3), and 18S rRNA was performed using MrBayes version 3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001) to explore relationships between the taxa. The analysis was conducted on the concatenated dataset using the GTR + I + G model, where ngen set to 2–3 × 105, with two runs each containing four simultaneous Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) chains and every 100th tree saved. Samples of substitution model parameters and tree and branch lengths were summarized using the parameters “sump burnin = 0.25” and “sumt burnin = 0.25.” The topologies were used to generate a 50 % majority rule consensus tree. Posterior probabilities (PP) are given on appropriate clades. The tree formula retrieved from the CON file of MrBayes was imported for editing to FigTree v1.4.0 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/).
Secondary structure prediction and analysis
Secondary structure of the variable D domains of 28S rRNA sequences of various paramphistome species was predicted using minimum free energy folding algorithms with RNAfold webserver, and structures with the highest negative free energy were chosen (Hofacker et al. 1994). Alignment of the predicted D domains of the secondary structures was performed using 4SALE (Seibel et al. 2006). A CBC table was also constructed for each domain. The alignment was imported into PETfold (Seemann et al. 2011) to display the highlighted reliable base pairing.
Results
Sequence analysis of 28S rRNA domains and 18S rRNA region
The 28S and 18S rRNA contigs gave a length of 1,200 and 1,800 bp, respectively. The 28S rRNA domains, viz., DI, D2, and D3 were 194, 547, and 189 bp, with a GC content of 47.4–50.5 %, 55.9 %–57.2 %, and 60.8 %–62.9 %, respectively (Figs. 1, 2, 3, and 4; Table 2). The sequence identity values of all these regions (Fig. 5a–d) indicated that the highest nucleotide difference (15.4 %) was observed in D1 as compared with D2 (4.4 %), D3 (4.3 %), and 18S rRNA (1.8 %). Amongst the domains, D2 was the most conserved with 0.8 % degree of divergence and D1, the most variable showing 7.9 % degree of divergence (Fig. 6).
Phylogenetic tree construction
The three domains of 28S and 18S rRNA sequence data were each analyzed independently and concatenated (D1 + D2 + D3) using BI. All trees were compared for similar clustering of taxa. The trees retrieved from the individual 28S domains illustrated dissimilar topologies of the various taxa (Figs. 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11). The D1 tree was the most poorly resolved as compared with the trees of other domains. In D1, tree members of the mentioned subfamilies of Paramphistomidae and members of Olveriidae and Gastrodiscidae (Table 1) do not cluster with their corresponding sister taxa and the branching, and placement of the various taxa poorly conform to the morphology-based taxonomy of these flukes (Fig. 7). D2 provided a better resolution than D1 and D3, and 18S rRNA. The sister species of Orthocoelium (Orthocoeliinae), Olveria (Olveriidae), and Gastrodiscoides hominis (Gastrodiscidae) grouped in concert based on the informative sequences of D2 domain indicating the robustness of this domain in comparison to the other domains (Fig. 8). The tree constructed based on the informative sequences of D3 domain could resolve only members of the Orthocoeliinae and Olveriidae; the nodes were not supported by significant bootstrap values (Fig. 9).
The BI of 18S rRNA did not yield a good taxonomic resolution at the species level. The fragment consists of relatively long and highly conserved sequences with a divergence of merely 0.102 %. 18S rRNA thus failed to resolve the groupings of these flukes; none of the members clustered with their sister taxa (Fig. 10).
However, the concatenated tree constructed based on the D1 + D2 + D3 domains of 28S rRNA provided a superior topology of the taxa concerned as opposed to 18S rRNA (Figs. 10 and 11). The mentioned members of the various families were well nested accordingly with high support values. The tree was also able to resolve members of subfamily Paramphistominae, which had shown variable nesting in the individual trees of D1, D2, D3, and 18S rRNA.
Secondary structure prediction and analysis
Since the 28S rRNA divergent domains comprise one or a series of reputed helical and nonpairing regions that are valuable for evaluating different levels of taxonomic divergence (Gillespie et al. 2005), their secondary structures were generated based on the consensus of sequence-structure of each of the domains to determine any “morphological” information that may exist as variations in the helices/loops of these domains. Using PETfold 3 consensus structures were predicted for the individual D1–D3 domains (Figs. 12, 13, and 14).
In accordance with 4SALE, D1 having a length of 194 bp, comprises 3 helices (H1–H3), of which H1 has eight sub-helices (a–h) and is the most variable helix where most of its sub helices show the least degree of conservation with the exception of H1–f (Fig. 12). The D2 consensus secondary structure is also composed of three helices, with H3 showing the least pairing reliabilities as indicated in the stem; nucleotide variations are scattered to a lesser extent in other helices. However, with a length of 547 bp, the nucleotide difference expressed for D2 was 0.804 %, the lowest amongst the three domains. This may perhaps explain the improved resolution of the taxa in the tree topology (Fig. 13). With a length of 189 bp, the D3 consensus secondary structure generated yielded a 4-helical structure, with H4 showing the least heterogeneity in terms of nucleotide changes. The D3 segment was able to resolve only members of Orthocoeliinae and Olveriidae. This marker proved to be more robust than D1 (Fig. 14).
As depicted in Table 3, the presence of CBCs essentially is shown only in the D2 domain (Table 3). A complete CBC was noted at positions 402 and 484 (G-C ⟺ A-U) between Olveria indica and members of Orthocoeliinae and between O. indica and members of Paramphistominae. Such a transition was also observed interestingly with Olveria bosi (Fig. 15a). A transitional mutation (A-U ⟺ G-C) was also found at position 43 between Explanatum explanatum and Calicophoron calicophorum and at position 167 between E. explanatum and O. bosi (Fig. 15b). Another complete CBC was detected at positions 229 and 344 between Cotylophoron cotylophorum and Calicophoron shillongensis (G-C ⟺ A-U) (Fig. 15c). These may possibly be the positions that have gathered high substitutions in D2 stems.
Discussion
In the analysis performed using the various divergent markers, viz., 28S (D1-D3 domains) and 18S rRNA individually and collectively (D1 + D2 + D3), the D1 and D3 expansion segments of the 28S gene showed significant interspecific sequence differences among the paramphistome taxa. The inability for D1 to resolve the taxa may, therefore, be attributed to the mutational pattern found in its H1 helix of D1. This is in concordance to the earlier findings, thereby implying that D1 domain is in fact more appropriate for inference of phylogenetic relationships among closely related families, genera, and some species in the Digenea (Barker et al. 1993). D2, however, emerged as the most robust marker that could provide efficient nesting of flukes in accordance with their taxonomic placement and thus yielded the best resolution. Since D2 could discriminate between closely related species as compared with other domains and 18S rRNA, this domain may be used as a species diagnostic marker possibly contributing to a more reliable phylogenetic inference of paramphistomes.
The concatenated D domains of 28S versus 18S rRNA produced a tree where the former resolved the taxa by the well supported nesting of the members of the paramphistomid group in concordance to their subfamilies; the 18S gene, however, could not resolve the species with the same conformity as 28S rRNA (Zhao et al. 2012). Since it evolves at a slow rate, 18S rRNA is unable to resolve species-level differences between lineages and is considered well suited for evaluating deep-level relationships among organisms (Adoutte et al. 2000; Van de Peer et al. 2000; Fontaneto 2011). Thus, 18S rRNA has proven to be useful for resolving phylogenies at higher taxonomic levels within metazoan groups (Field et al. 1988; Abele et al. 1989; Friedrich and Tautz 1995; Blair et al. 1996; Aguinaldo et al. 1997; Campos et al. 1998; Whiting 1998; Hwang and Kim 1999; Cruickshank 2002). Conversely, 28S rRNA marker is much larger in size and has more variation in the rate of evolution compared with 18S rRNA (Hwang and Kim 1999). The 28S rRNA D domains have been employed as effective genetic markers for determining phylogenetic relationship both at lower and higher taxonomic levels (Al-Banna et al. 1997; Al-Banna et al. 2004; Duncan et al. 1999; Subbotin et al. 2005, 2007, 2008; Vovlas et al. 2008) and may therefore be a well-suited marker for inferring the phylogeny of paramphistomes. Furthermore, its respective domains, in particular D2, may be used as an effective marker for species identification. As a whole, the phylogenetic trees that could resolve the paramphistomid flukes indicated that the subfamily Orthocoeliinae shared similar historical patterns with the family Olveriidae than with its sister subfamily Paramphistominae; the two subfamilies of Paramphistomidae do not cluster together in any of the trees constructed, thus indicating a possible divergence of the members. Species belonging to Paramphistominae are variable in their taxonomical nesting whereby clustering of C. cotylophorum and E. explanatum could not be resolved by any of the markers. The family Gastrodiscidae (Homalogaster paloniae and Gastrodiscoides hominis) forms a deeply divergent clade from the rest of the families; this may be explained by the distinct morphological features of these members which are characterized by a dorsoventrally flattened body, which, in some taxa, appears as divided into two parts unlike paramphistomids of the present study (Jones 2005b). Incidently, G. hominis is also the only zoonotic amphistome.
Secondary structures, predicted based on the sequence-structure alignment, assist in providing a precise evaluation of nucleotide similarity that is sourced from the same evolutionary origin (Dixon and Hillis 1993; Kjer 1995; Chilton et al. 2001). Secondary structures of the variable regions of 28S rRNA have been used as effective tools for phylogenetic studies (Bachellerie and Michot 1989; Hwang et al. 2000). The nucleotide variations observed in the consensus secondary structures in the present study substantiate the findings of primary homology; there is high variation between taxa in the base composition of helices. The divergence in 28S rRNA domains is thus contributed by the variability of these helices with the D2 region being the most informative.
The CBCs observed in the secondary structures were classified as a Type I substitution that changes one pair of complementary bases to another pair (Dixon and Hillis 1993). The compensatory mutations in stems are associated with upholding of the secondary structures (Hancock et al. 1988; Ramirez and Ramírez 2010). The divergent domains of the 28S rRNA, even though not used in the inference of higher-level phylogenetic analysis, can be used for lower-level analyses, i.e., at the species or even subspecies level (Littlewood 1994; Mallatt and Sullivan 1998; Jarmen et al. 2000; Litvaitis et al. 2000; Winchell et al., 2002). The high nucleotide heterogeneity in the D domains of the 28S rRNA gene amongst paramphistomid species may be valuable for species distinction. In the case of nematodes, the D2-D3 expansion segments are promising candidates for DNA barcoding (De Ley et al. 2005; Bae et al. 2010). The D2 segment of 28S rRNA may consequently be considered a potential complement to mitochondrial DNA-based barcodes as well.
Regarding paramphistomes, the divergent domains of 28S rRNA and their secondary structure prediction has not been explored, so far. The present study provides the first ever information on this aspect. Identification of any varied structural constraints still necessitates more data from different taxa of Paramphistomidae. The diversity spectrum of paramphistomids is still highly undervalued both at the morphological and molecular level. A molecular approach will therefore, expedite the estimation of this group of parasites of veterinary importance.
References
Abele LG, Kim W, Felegenhauer BE (1989) Molecular evidence for inclusion of the phylum Pentastomida in the Crustacea. Mol Biol Evol 6:685–691
Adoutte A, Balavoine G, Lartillot N, Lespinet O, Prud'homme B, de Rosa R (2000) The new animal phylogeny: reliability and implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:4453–4456
Aguinaldo AMA, Turbeville JM, Linford LS, Rivera MC, Garey JR, Raff RA, Lake JA (1997) Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals. Nature 387:489–493
Al-Banna L, Willamson VM, Gardner SL (1997) Phylogenetic analysis of nematodes of the genus Pratylenchus using nuclear 26S rDNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol 7:94–102
Al-Banna L, Ploeg AT, Williamson VM, Kaloshian A (2004) Discrimination of six Pratylenchus species using PCR and species-specific primers. J Nematol 36:142–146
Álvarez I, Wendel JF (2003) Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Mol Phylogenet Evol 29:417–434
Anuracpreeda P, Wanichanon C, Sobhon P (2008) Paramphistomum cervi: antigenic profile of adults as recognized by infected cattle sera. Exp Parasitol 118:203–207
Bachellerie JP, Michot B (1989) Evolution of large subunit rRNA structure The 3' terminal domain contains elements of secondary structure specific to major phylogenetic groups. Biochimie 71:701–709
Bae CH, Robbins RT, Szalanski AL (2010) Secondary structure models of D2-D3 expansion segments of 28S rRNA for Hoplolaiminae species. J Nematol 42(3):218–229
Barker SC, Blair D, Garrett AR, Cribb TH (1993) Utility of the D1 domain of nuclear 28S rRNA for phylogenetic inference in the Digenea. Syst Parasitol 26:181–188
Blair D, Campos A, Cummings MP, Laclette JP (1996) Evolutionary biology of parasitic platyhelminths: the role of molecular phylogenetics. Parasitol Today 12:66–71
Campos A, Cummings MP, Reyes JL, Laclette JP (1998) Phylogenetic relationships of Platyhelminthes based on 18S ribosomal gene sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 10(1):1–10
Chethanon U, Ausavamatha P, Piriyayon S, (1985) Parasitological survey of cattle in the south of Thailand. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Livestock Conference, Department Livestock Development 281–290
Chilton NB, Hoste H, Newton LA, Beveridge I, Gasser RB (2001) Evolutionary relationships of trichostrongyloid nematodes (Strongylid) inferred from ribosomal DNA sequence data. Mol Phylogenet Evol 19:367–386
Chilton NB, Huby-Chilton F, Gasser RB (2003) First complete large subunit ribosomal RNA sequence and secondary structure for a parasitic nematode: phylogenetic and diagnostic implications. Mol Cell Probes 17:33–39
Coleman AW (2000) The significance of a coincidence between evolutionary landmarks found in mating affinity and a DNA sequence. Protist 151:1–9
Coleman AW (2003) ITS2 is a double-edged tool for eukaryote evolutionary comparisons. TIG 19:370–375
Coleman AW (2007) Pan-eukaryote ITS2 homologies revealed by RNA secondary structure. Nucleic Acids Res 35(10):3322–3329
Coleman AW, Vacquier V (2002) Exploring the phylogenetic utility of ITS sequences for animals: a test case for Abalone (Haliotis). J Mol Evol 54:246–257
Cruickshank RH (2002) Molecular markers for the phylogenetics of mites and ticks. Syst Appl Acarol 7:3–14
De Ley P, De Ley IT, Morris K, Abebe E, Mundo-Ocampo M, Yoder M, Heras J, Waumann D, Rocha-Olivares A, Jay Burr AH, Baldwin JG, Thomas WK (2005) An integrated approach to fast and informative morphological vouchering of nematodes for applications in molecular barcoding. J Philos Trans R Soc Lond B; Biol Sci 360(1462):1945–1958
De Rijk P, Van de Peer Y, Van den Broeck I, DeWachter R (1995) Evolution according to large ribosomal subunit RNA. J Mol Evol 41:366–375
Díez B, Pedrós-Alió C, Massana R (2001) Study of genetic diversity of eukaryotic picoplankton in different oceanic regions by small-subunit rRNA gene cloning and sequencing. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2932–2941
Dixon MT, Hillis DM (1993) Ribosomal RNA secondary structure: compensatory mutations and implications for phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 10(1):256–267
Duncan LW, Inserra RN, Thomas WK, Dunn D, Mustika I, Frisse LM, Mendes ML, Morris K, Kaplan DT (1999) Molecular and morphological analysis of isolates of Pratylenchus coffeae and closely related species. Nematropica 29:61–80
Field KG, Olsen GJ, Lane DJ, Giovannoni SJ, Ghiselin MT, Raff EC, Pace NR, Raff RA (1988) Molecular phylogeny of the animal kingdom. Science 239:748–753
Fontaneto D (2011) Biogeography of microscopic organisms is everything small everywhere? Cambridge University Press, Imperial College London
Friedrich M, Tautz D (1995) Ribosomal DNA phylogeny of the major extant arthropod classes and the evolution of myriapods. Nature 376:165–167
Ghatani S, Shylla JA, Tandon V, Chatterjee A, Roy B (2012) Molecular characterization of pouched amphistome parasites (Trematoda: Gastrothylacidae) using ribosomal ITS2 sequence and secondary structures. J Helminthologia 86:117–124
Gillespie JJ, Munro JB, Heraty JM, Yoder MJ, Owen AK, Carmichael AE (2005) A secondary structural model of the 28S rRNA expansion segments D2 and D3 for chalcidoid wasps (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Mol Biol Evol 22(7):1593–1608
Goswami LM, Prasad PK, Tandon V, Chatterjee A (2009) Molecular characterization of Gastrodiscoides hominis (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda: Digenea) inferred from ITS rDNA sequence analysis. Parasitol Res 104:1485–1490
Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98
Hancock JM, Tautz D, Dover GA (1988) Evolution of the secondary structures and compensatory mutations of the ribosomal RNAs of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Evol 5:393–414
Hassouna N, Michot B, Bachellerie JP (1984) The complete nucleotide sequence of mouse 28S rRNA gene: implications for the process of size increase of the large subunit rRNA in higher eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 12:3563–3583
Hershkovitz M, Lewis L (1996) Deep level diagnostic value of the rDNA-ITS region: the case of an algal interloper. Mol Biol Evol 13:167–177
Hofacker IL, Fontana W, Stadler PF, Bonhoeffer S, Tacker M, Schuster P (1994) Fast folding and comparison of RNA secondary structures. Monatsh Chem 125:167–188
Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754–755
Hwang UW, Kim W (1999) General properties and phylogenetic utilities of nuclear ribosomal DNA and mitochondrial DNA commonly used in molecular systematics. Korean J Parasitol 37:215–228
Hwang UW, Ree HI, Kim W (2000) Evolution of hypervariable regions, V4 and V7, of insect 18S rRNA and their phylogenetic implications. Zool Sci 17:111–121
Ilha MR, Loretti AP, Reis AC (2005) Wasting and mortality in beef cattle parasitized by Eurytrema coelamaticum in the state of Parana, southern Brazil. Vet Parasitol 133:49–60
Itagaki T, Tsumagari N, Tsutsumi K, Chinone S (2003) Discrimination of three amphistome species by PCR-RFLP based on rDNA ITS2 markers. J Vet Med Sci 65:931–933
Jarmen SN, Nicol S, Elliott NG, McMinn A (2000) 28S rDNA evolution in the eumalacostraca and the phylogenetic position of krill. Mol Phylogenet Evol 17:26–36
Jones A (1990) Techniques for sectioning thick-bodied platyhelminths. Syst Parasitol 15:211–218
Jones A (2005a) Superfamily Paramphistomoidea Fischoeder, 1901. In: Jones A, Bray RA, Gibson DI (eds) Keys to the Trematoda, vol 2. CABI Publishing and The Natural History Museum, London, pp 221–227
Jones A (2005b) Family Gastrodiscidae Monticelli, 1892. In: Jones A, Bray RA, Gibson DI (eds) Keys to the Trematoda, vol 2. CABI Publishing and The Natural History Museum, London, pp 325–336
Juyal PD, Kasur K, Hassan SS, Kaur P (2003) Epidemiological status of paramphistomiasis in domestic ruminants in Punjab. J Parasit Dis 231–235
Kaukas A, Neto ED, Simpson AJG, Southgate VR, Rollinson D (1994) A phylogenetic analysis of Schistosoma haematobium group species based on randomly amplified polymorphic DNA. Int J Parasitol 24:285–290
Khan UJ, Tanveer A, Maqbool A, Masood S (2008) Epidemiological studies of paramphistomosis in cattle. Vet Arh 78:243–251
Kilani K, Guillot J, Chermett R (2003) Amphistomes digestive. In: Lefevre PC, Blanco J, Chermatt J (eds) Principales maladies infectieuses et parasitaires du betail, 1st edn. Tec & Doc, Paris, pp 1400–1410
Kjer KM (1995) Use of rRNA secondary structure in phylogenetic studies to identify homologous positions: an example of alignment and data presentation from the frogs. Mol Phylogenet Evol 4:314–330
Leon-Regagnon V, Paredes-Calderon EL (2002) Haematoloechus danbrooksi n. sp (Digenea: Plagiorchioidea) from Rana vaillanti from Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, Mexico. J Parasitol 88:1215–1221
Littlewood DTJ (1994) Molecular phylogenetics of cupped oysters based on partial 28S rRNA gene sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 3:221–229
Litvaitis MK, Bates JW, Hope WD, Moens T (2000) Inferring a classification of the Adenophorea (Nematoda) from nucleotide sequences of the D3 expansion segment (26/28S rDNA). Can J Zool 78:911–922
Lotfy WM, Brant SV, Ashmawy KI, Devkota R, Mkojie GM, Loker ES (2010) A molecular approach for identification of paramphistomes from Africa and Asia. Vet Parasitol 174:234–240
Mage C, Bourgne H, Toullieu JM, Rondelaud D, Dreyfuss G (2002) Fasciola hepatica and Paramphistomum daubneyi: changes in the prevalence of natural infections in cattle and Lymnaea truncatula from Central France over the past 12 years. Vet Res 33:439–447
Mallatt J, Sullivan J (1998) 28S and 18S rDNA sequences support the monophyly of lampreys and hagfishes. Mol Biol Evol 15:1706–1718
Medina M, Collins AG, Silberman JD, Sogin ML (2001) Evaluating hypotheses of basal animal phylogeny using complete sequences of large and small subunit rRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:9707–9712
Müller T, Philippi N, Dandekar T, Schultz J, Wolf M (2007) Distinguishing species. RNA 1:1469–1472
Nolan MJ, Cribb TH (2005) The use and implications of ribosomal DNA sequencing for the discrimination of digenean species. Adv Parasitol 60:101–163
Prasitirat T, Chompoochan S, Nithiuthai S, Wongkasemjit T, Punmamoamg P, Pongrut S, Chinone S, Itagaki H (1997) Prevalence of amphistomes of cattle in Thailand. Parasitol Hung 29–30:27–32
Ramirez J, Ramírez R (2010) Analysis of the secondary structure of mitochondrial LSU rRNA of Peruvian land snails (Orthalicidae: Gastropoda). Rev Peru Biol 17(1):053–057
Rinaldi L, Perugini AG, Capuano F, Fenizia D, Musella V, Veneziano V, Cringoli G (2005) Characterization of the second internal transcribed spacer of ribosomal DNA of Calicophoron daubneyi from various hosts and locations in southern Italy. Vet Parasitol 131:247–253
Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes version 3.0: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574
Roy B, Tandon V (1992) Trematodiasis in North-East India: a study on the spectrum of Digenetic trematodes among pigs, buffaloes, cattle, goats and sheep. Indian J Anim Health 13:5–14
Ruhl MW, Wolf M, Jenkins TM (2009) Compensatory base changes illuminate taxonomically difficult taxonomy. Mol Phylogenet Evol 54:664–669
Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
Sanabria R, Romero J (2008) Review and update of paramphistomosis. Helminthologia 45:64–68
Seemann ES, Menzel KP, Backofen R, Gorodkin J (2011) The PETfold and PETcofold web servers for intra- and intermolecular structures of multiple RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 39(2):107–111
Seibel PN, Muller T, Dandekar T, Schultz J, Wolf M (2006) 4SALE–a tool for synchronous RNA sequence and secondary structure alignment and editing. BMC Bioinforma 7:498
Sey O (1991) CRC handbook of the zoology of Amphistomes. CRC Press, Florida, Boca Raton
Shylla JA, Ghatani S, Chatterjee A, Tandon V (2011) Secondary structure analysis of ITS2 in the rDNA of three Indian paramphistomid species found in local livestock. Parasitol Res 108:1027–1032
Snyder SD, Tkach VV (2001) Phylogenetic and biogeographical relationships among some holarctic frog lung flukes (Digenea: Haematoloechidae). J Parasitol 87:1433–1440
Subbotin SA, Sturhan D, Vovlas N, Castillo P, Tanyi Tambe J, Moens M, Baldwin JG (2007) Application of secondary structure model of rRNA for phylogeny: D2-D3 expansion segments of the LSU gene of plant-parasitic nematodes from the family Hoplolaimidae Filipjev, 1934. Mol Phylogenet Evol 43:881–890
Subbotin SA, Vovlas N, Crozzoli R, Sturhan D, Lamberti F, Moens M, Baldwin JG (2005) Phylogeny of Criconematina Siddiqi, 1980 (Nematode: Tylenchida) based on morphology and D2-D3 expansion segments of the 28S-rRNA gene sequences with application of a secondary structure model. Nematology 7:927–944
Subbotin SA, Ragsdale EJ, Mullens T, Roberts PA, Mundo-Ocampo M, Baldwin JG (2008) A phylogenetic framework for root lesion nematodes of the genus Pratylenchus (Nematoda): evidence from 18S and D2-D3 expansion segments of 28S ribosomal RNA genes and morphological characters. Mol Phylogenet Evol 48:491–505
Thornhill DJ, LaJeunesse TC, Santos SR (2007) Measuring rDNA diversity in eukaryotic microbial systems: how intragenomic variation, pseudogenes, and PCR artefacts confound biodiversity estimates. Mol Ecol 16:5326–5340
Tkach VV, Pawlowski J, Mariaux J (2000) Phylogenetic analysis of the suborder Plagiorchiata (Platyhelminthes, Digenea) based on partial lsrDNA sequences. Int J Parasitol 3:89–93
Tkach V, Pawlowski J, Mariaux J, Swiderski Z (2001) Molecular phylogeny of the suborder Plagiorchiata and its position in the system of Digenea. In: Littlewood DTJ, Bray RA (eds) Interrelationships of the Platyhelminthes. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 186–193
Van de Peer Y, Baldouf SL, Doolittle WF, Meyer A (2000) An updated and comprehensive rRNA phylogeny of (crown) eukaryotes based on rate-calibrated evolutionary distances. J Mol Evol 51:565–576
Vovlas N, Subbotin SA, Troccoli A, Liebanas G, Castillo P (2008) Molecular phylogeny of the genus Rotylenchus (Nematoda, Tylenchida) and description of a new species. Zool Scr 37:521–537
Wheeler WC, Honeycutt RL (1988) Paired sequence difference in ribosomal RNAs: evolution and phylogenetic implications. Mol Biol Evol 5:90–96
Whiting MF (1998) Phylogenetic position of the Strepsiptera: review of molecular and morphological evidence. Int J Morphol Embryol 27:53–60
Wickramasinghe S, Yatawara L, Rajapakse RPVJ, Agatsuma T (2009) Toxocara canis and Toxocara vitulorum : molecular characterization, discrimination, and phylogenetic analysis based on mitochondrial (ATP synthase subunit 6 and 12S) and nuclear ribosomal (ITS-2 and 28S) genes. Parasitol Res 104:1425–1430
Winchell CJ, Sullivan J, Cameron CB, Swalla BJ, Mallatt J (2002) Evaluating hypotheses of deuterostome evolution with new LSU and SSU ribosomal DNA phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 19:762–776
Yan H, Lou Z, Li L, Ni X, Guo A, Li H, Zheng Y, Dyachenko V, Jia W (2013) The nuclear 18S ribosomal RNA gene as a source of phylogenetic information in the genus Taenia. Parasitol Res 112:1343–1347
Zhao Ya-E W, Li-Ping H, Li X, Yang WZ-H, Wen-Yan L (2012) Sequencing for complete rDNA sequences (18S, ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2, and 28S rDNA) of Demodex and phylogenetic analysis of Acari based on 18S and 28S rDNA. Parasitol Res 111:2109–2114
Acknowledgment
JAS is thankful to Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Delhi, for awarding her junior and senior research fellowships.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shylla, J.A., Ghatani, S. & Tandon, V. Utility of divergent domains of 28S ribosomal RNA in species discrimination of paramphistomes (Trematoda: Digenea: Paramphistomoidea). Parasitol Res 112, 4239–4253 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-013-3616-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-013-3616-8