Abstract
Purpose
For better selection of oocytes and embryos, preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) was introduced. As from the beginning of IVF, morphology was used as selection criteria; we investigated the combination of both. If there was a correlation between phenotype and genotype, invasive PGS might be replaced.
Method
Therefore, 104 cycles with PGS were done by biopsy of the first polar body and FISH with five chromosomes. Morphology of the oocyte was recorded digitally and noted for 12 categories in 4–13 values; evaluation of the chromosomes was noted for five chromosomes in five values. Morphology and genetics were correlated to each other.
Result
Correlations between morphology and genetics for day 0 were found: oocytes with an irregular or dark zona are less probable to have a normal chromosome 13 (80 vs. 53 %, p = 0.001). A medium amount of detritus in the perivitelline space makes it more probable to have a normal chromosome 18 (94 vs. 78 %, p = 0.001). A halo in the cytoplasm makes it less probable to be euploid for chromosome 22 (56 vs. 75 %, p = 0.018). For day 1, pattern “1, 2, 3 and fine” in the pronuclei makes it more probable to be euploid for chromosome 22 (78 vs. 63 %, p = 0.002).
Conclusion
There are correlations between the oocyte genome and its morphology also on day 0. These correlations are not sufficient to replace PGS.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The result of artificial reproductive techniques (ART) in the human species is limited. Thinkable approaches for optimization are: better quality, in the clinical or laboratory work, and better selection of gametes or embryos. For better selection, the “omics” were introduced in ART: preimplantation screening of oocytes and (pre-) embryos by genomics, proteomics and metabolomics. The principle of this idea is not new: from the beginning of IVF, morphology of oocytes and embryos was used as selection criteria. The problem is: to what extent is there a correlation between phenotype and genotype in oocytes and embryos at that early stage, in vitro? If this extent is only low, any selection criteria other than PGS can only lead to limited success. Ideal selection criteria other than PGS should exclude a maximum of aneuploidies.
Morphology is an easy-to-detect phenotypical selection tool. But criteria for its description have to be standardized and evaluated. Furthermore, morphology changes over time, so the point in time for observation, matters. Last but not least, it is not clear as to which point in time correlates best with the outcome. Also the best time for a genetic analysis of the embryo is not clear for various reasons. Morphology checks in practice are normally done daily when other works on oocytes and embryos are carried out. These times differ, and morphologic criteria are not unanimously accepted. Investigations of the morphologic development in relation to a time scheme with time lapse (“embryo scope”) might deliver an additional selection marker. As many randomized controlled trials (RCT) found no benefit of PGS [1] and only now first significant results were presented [2–4], we wanted to check if PGS could be replaced by morphologic observations. As embryo selection is not allowed in our country, we opted for polar body biopsy. So we related the morphology of the oocyte to the result of its genetic investigation.
Morphology of oocytes and embryos can be checked by stereo light microscopy, on a routine basis, at lower magnification (80×), or more detailed at the stage of the microscope of the micromanipulator (400×). It is also possible to record the picture by photograph or film. For the genetic part, FISH and aCGH are thinkable. For scientific morphologic investigations of oocytes or embryos, 400× magnification and photography are most common. For PGS of oocytes first or first and second polar bodies are analysed. For genetic analysis, FISH with 5–9 probes are most common. With the introduction of PGS in our program [5] by laser biopsy we opted for digital imaging of all oocytes. In order to reduce possible harm to the oocyte by two distinct micromanipulations (ICSI and biopsy) within a day we biopsied only the first polar body. As we did not charge the patients for PGS we limited FISH to five probes.
Methods
PGS was offered to all patients with eight or more oocytes. If there were more than about 12 we offered “splitting” to the patients: as cryopreservation of biopsied oocytes is not very successful, we proposed to perform PGS on 8–10 oocytes and freeze the rest. We used all established stimulation protocols, adapted to the patient, with a first line therapy with the long GnRH protocol with oral contraceptives (Valette, Ethinylestradiol 0.03 mg and Dienogest 2 mg) and nasal Spay (Synarela, Nafarelin 0.8 mg/d).
After hyaluronidase treatment, the amount of mature oocytes was detected. Together with the patient, it was decided if a splitting between PGS and cryopreservation should be done. For hybridization the standard set of probes from Vysis was used: chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21 and 22. The digital registration of the oocyte was performed with the Octax system (MTG, Bruckberg, Germany). The FISH results were evaluated by two investigators following preset standards. If their decision was not unanimous, a senior third decided. The results were noted for each chromosome of the five chromosomes in 5 values from 0 to 4, depending on the number of signals detected (Table 1). As each chromosome in the first polar body has got two chromatids, two signals signified one whole chromosome in the polar body and one chromosome in the oocyte, which signified the only normal value.
The morphology was noted at the time of biopsy and on the following day (Table 2). Primarily five distinct microanatomic parts of the oocyte were described: first polar body, pronuclei, cytoplasm, perivitelline space and zona pellucida. These categories were ranked in preset values for each category (see Table 2). Secondly any other special morphologic phenomena were noted (Table 2, # 8, 10, 12). The morphologic and genetic categories were than correlated with each other (Table 3). This can be done in an analysis from fine to coarse: (1) single categories versus single categories, with all variables or divided in only two (“good” and “bad”); (2) single versus all categories as a whole, again with all categories as variables or only two (genetics or morphology of the whole oocyte) and vice versa (3); (4) all genetic categories as a whole versus all morphologic categories as a whole, again with all categories as variables or only two.
The study was registered and approved by the Ethics Commission of the Medical Faculty of the Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel. Statistic tests were performed with SPSS. Significant correlations were accepted if the Chi-square test (Pearson) showed an asymptotic significance (2-sided) of ≤0.05.
Results
From 104 PGS cycles we generated 1,181 mature oocytes; 893 were biopsied, and from 621 we got genetic results. Morphologic phenomena were noted in detail with a maximum of 932 for pronuclei (Table 2). Oocytes were not biopsied because of “splitting”, attributing part of the oocyte pool to cryopreservation. Polar bodies could not be biopsied due to biological or technical reasons. Oocytes were not classified morphologically due to omissions in the laboratory. Genetic results were not achieved due to problems with fixation, hybridisation or analysis.
Significant correlations could be found for all four different comparisons of the first step of analysis (Table 3 I 1–4.), i.e., for single chromosomes versus single morphologic categories. These comprised four of the five major entities: for day 0 zona, perivitelline space, cytoplasm but not polar bodies, and for day 1 pronuclei (Table 4). Further steps found a single correlation (Table 3, III 11, “whole vs. single”) for euploid oocytes versus zona specialties (p = 0.028). The zona correlates with chromosomes 13, 16, 21 and 22. A normal zona correlates with a normal chromosome 13, especially oocytes with an irregular or dark zona are less probable to have a normal chromosome 13 (80 vs. 53 %, p = 0.001). The perivitelline space correlates with chromosome 18, a medium amount of detritus makes it more probable to have a normal chromosome 18 (94 vs. 78 %, p = 0.001). Cytoplasm specialties and the pattern of the pronuclei correlate with chromosome 22. A halo makes it less probable to be euploid for chromosome 22 (56 vs. 75 %, p = 0.018). Pattern “1, 2, 3 and fine” make it more probable to be euploid for chromosome 22 (78 vs. 63 %, p = 0.002).
Discussion
From 621 oocytes we got chromosomal results and from up to 932 oocytes morphological descriptions. These are sufficient data to correlate morphology and genetics. Significant correlations were found for zona, perivitelline space, cytoplasm and pronuclei. There is only little literature concerning a relation between oocyte morphology and aneuploidy for day 0. Bad cytoplasm was related to a seemingly increased proportion of aneuploidy, by conventional karyogram [6]. For day 1 pronuclei scores were found related to aneuploidy with blastomere biopsy day 3 and FISH [7–10], as well as development in vitro with time lapse [11]. First analysis in the beginning of our trial found correlations of oocyte aneuploidy with zona, polar body and perivitelline space [12, 13].
Correlations between oocyte morphology and development in vitro and in vivo were often looked for and mostly found:
-
For the perivitelline space (yes: [24, 29, 33]; no: [22, 34]);
-
For the cytoplasm (yes: [24, 29, 35–37]; also for spindles [38]; no: [22, 23, 26, 32, 39]);
So it is not astonishing that most oocyte features also for day 0 can be also related to genetics. Only the correlations found unfortunately are not big enough to have a clinical relevance. The differences are just between 15 and 27 percent points and only relate to single chromosomes. aCGH might bring a higher efficiency towards a relation between oocyte morphology and genome. For the aim of the study, to find possibly a morphologic replacement for PGS, one can say that this was not found. Even if there is a correlation between a normal zona and a normal chromosome 13, the discrimination is not big enough and cannot lead to a clinical relevance. So for the time being PGS cannot be replaced by morphology, but a future broader application of aCGH with an analysis of all chromosomes might change that.
References
Geraedts J, Collins J, Gianaroli L, Goossens V, Handyside A, Harper J, Montag M, Repping S, Schmutzler A (2010) What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach! Hum Reprod 25:575–577
Schoolcraft, W. B., Surrey, E., Minjarez, D., Gustofson, R. L., Scott, J., R T and Katz-Jaffe, M. G. (2012) Comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) with vitrification results in improved clinical outcome in women >35 years: a randomized control trial. Fertil Steril, 98, Suppl 1
Yang Z, Liu J, Collins GS, Salem SA, Liu X, Lyle SS, Peck AC, Sills ES, Salem RD (2012) Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Mol Cytogenet 5:24
Rubio C, Bellver J, Rodrigo L, Bosch E, Mercader A, Vidal C, De Los Santos MJ, Giles J, Labarta E, Domingo J, Crespo J, Remohi J, Pellicer A, Simon C (2013) Preimplantation genetic screening using fluorescence in situ hybridization in patients with repetitive implantation failure and advanced maternal age: two randomized trials. Fertil Steril 99:1400–1407
Schmutzler A, Acar-Perk B, Weimer J, Salmassi A, Sievers K, Tobler M, Mettler L, Jonat W, Arnold N (2013) Sham controlled implantation after preimplantation genetic screening by polar body biopsy and FISH. Arch Gynecol Obstet. doi:10.1007/s00404-013-2945-2
Van Blerkom J, Henry G (1992) Oocyte dysmorphism and aneuploidy in meiotically mature human oocytes after ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod 7:379–390
Kahraman S, Kumtepe Y, Sertyel S, Donmez E, Benkhalifa M, Findikli N, Vanderzwalmen P (2002) Pronuclear morphology scoring and chromosomal status of embryos in severe male infertility. Hum Reprod 17:3193–3200
Balaban B, Yakin K, Urman B, Isiklar A, Tesarik J (2004) Pronuclear morphology predicts embryo development and chromosome constitution. Reprod Biomed Online 8:695–700
Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Fortini D, Grieco N (2003) Pronuclear morphology and chromosomal abnormalities as scoring criteria for embryo selection. Fertil Steril 80:341–349
Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Lappi M, Borghi E, Ermini B (2007) Oocyte euploidy, pronuclear zygote morphology and embryo chromosomal complement. Hum Reprod 22:241–249
Campbell A, Fishel S, Bowman N, Duffy S, Sedler M, Hickman CF (2013) Modelling a risk classification of aneuploidy in human embryos using non-invasive morphokinetics. Reprod Biomed Online 26:477–485
Glander, M. (2006) Molekularzytogenetische Analyse menschlicher Polkörper zur Präimplantationsdiagnostik, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät. Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel
Schmutzler A, Glander M, Acar B, Weimer J, Hedderich J, Salmassi A, Arnold N, Mettler L (2009) Genetic imbalances of human oocytes according to zona thickness and size of the perivitelline space—preliminary data. US Obstetric Gynaecol 4:39–43
Bertrand E, Van den Bergh M, Englert Y (1995) Does zona pellucida thickness influence the fertilization rate? Hum Reprod 10:1189–1193
Garside WT, Loret de Mola JR, Bucci JA, Tureck RW, Heyner S (1997) Sequential analysis of zona thickness during in vitro culture of human zygotes: correlation with embryo quality, age, and implantation. Mol Reprod Dev 47:99–104
Gabrielsen A, Bhatnager PR, Petersen K, Lindenberg S (2000) Influence of zona pellucida thickness of human embryos on clinical pregnancy outcome following in vitro fertilization treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet 17:323–328
Gabrielsen A, Lindenberg S, Petersen K (2001) The impact of the zona pellucida thickness variation of human embryos on pregnancy outcome in relation to suboptimal embryo development. A prospective randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod 16:2166–2170
Host E, Gabrielsen A, Lindenberg S, Smidt-Jensen S (2002) Apoptosis in human cumulus cells in relation to zona pellucida thickness variation, maturation stage, and cleavage of the corresponding oocyte after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 77:511–515
Sun YP, Xu Y, Cao T, Su YC, Guo YH (2005) Zona pellucida thickness and clinical pregnancy outcome following in vitro fertilization. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 89:258–262
Shen Y, Stalf T, Mehnert C, Eichenlaub-Ritter U, Tinneberg HR (2005) High magnitude of light retardation by the zona pellucida is associated with conception cycles. Hum Reprod 20:1596–1606
Landwehr C, Montag M, van der Ven K, Weber RG (2008) Rapid comparative genomic hybridization protocol for prenatal diagnosis and its application to aneuploidy screening of human polar bodies. Fertil Steril 90:488–496
De Sutter P, Dozortsev D, Qian C, Dhont M (1996) Oocyte morphology does not correlate with fertilization rate and embryo quality after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 11:595–597
Balaban B, Urman B, Sertac A, Alatas C, Aksoy S, Mercan R (1998) Oocyte morphology does not affect fertilization rate, embryo quality and implantation rate after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 13:3431–3433
Xia P (1997) Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: correlation of oocyte grade based on polar body, perivitelline space and cytoplasmic inclusions with fertilization rate and embryo quality. Hum Reprod 12:1750–1755
Ebner T, Moser M, Yaman C, Feichtinger O, Hartl J, Tews G (1999) Elective transfer of embryos selected on the basis of first polar body morphology is associated with increased rates of implantation and pregnancy. Fertil Steril 72:599–603
Ebner T, Yaman C, Moser M, Sommergruber M, Feichtinger O, Tews G (2000) Prognostic value of first polar body morphology on fertilization rate and embryo quality in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 15:427–430
Ebner T, Moser M, Sommergruber M, Yaman C, Pfleger U, Tews G (2002) First polar body morphology and blastocyst formation rate in ICSI patients. Hum Reprod 17:2415–2418
Younis JS, Radin O, Mirsky N, Izhaki I, Majara T, Bar-ami S, Ben-ami M (2008) First polar body and nucleolar precursor body morphology is related to the ovarian reserve of infertile women. Reprod Biomed Online 16:851–858
Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM, Iacobelli M, Minasi MG, Romano S, Ferrero S, Sapienza F, Baroni E, Litwicka K, Greco E (2008) Significance of metaphase II human oocyte morphology on ICSI outcome. Fertil Steril 90:1692–1700
Verlinsky Y, Lerner S, Illkevitch N, Kuznetsov V, Kuznetsov I, Cieslak J, Kuliev A (2003) Is there any predictive value of first polar body morphology for embryo genotype or developmental potential? Reprod Biomed Online 7:336–341
Ciotti PM, Notarangelo L, Morselli-Labate AM, Felletti V, Porcu E, Venturoli S (2004) First polar body morphology before ICSI is not related to embryo quality or pregnancy rate. Hum Reprod 19:2334–2339
De Santis L, Cino I, Rabellotti E, Calzi F, Persico P, Borini A, Coticchio G (2005) Polar body morphology and spindle imaging as predictors of oocyte quality. Reprod Biomed Online 11:36–42
Farhi J, Nahum H, Weissman A, Zahalka N, Glezerman M, Levran D (2002) Coarse granulation in the perivitelline space and IVF-ICSI outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 19:545–549
Hassan-Ali H, Hisham-Saleh A, El-Gezeiry D, Baghdady I, Ismaeil I, Mandelbaum J (1998) Perivitelline space granularity: a sign of human menopausal gonadotrophin overdose in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 13:3425–3430
Serhal PF, Ranieri DM, Kinis A, Marchant S, Davies M, Khadum IM (1997) Oocyte morphology predicts outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 12:1267–1270
Loutradis D, Drakakis P, Kallianidis K, Milingos S, Dendrinos S, Michalas S (1999) Oocyte morphology correlates with embryo quality and pregnancy rate after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 72:240–244
Ebner T, Moser M, Sommergruber M, Gaiswinkler U, Shebl O, Jesacher K, Tews G (2005) Occurrence and developmental consequences of vacuoles throughout preimplantation development. Fertil Steril 83:1635–1640
Magli MC, Montag M, Koster M, Muzi L, Geraedts J, Collins J, Goossens V, Handyside AH, Harper J, Repping S, Schmutzler A, Vesela K, Gianaroli L (2011) Polar body array CGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part II: technical aspects. Hum Reprod 26:3181–3185
Kahraman S, Yakin K, Donmez E, Samli H, Bahce M, Cengiz G, Sertyel S, Samli M, Imirzalioglu N (2000) Relationship between granular cytoplasm of oocytes and pregnancy outcome following intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 15:2390–2393
Tesarik J, Junca AM, Hazout A, Aubriot FX, Nathan C, Cohen-Bacrie P, Dumont-Hassan M (2000) Embryos with high implantation potential after intracytoplasmic sperm injection can be recognized by a simple, non-invasive examination of pronuclear morphology. Hum Reprod 15:1396–1399
Scott L, Alvero R, Leondires M, Miller B (2000) The morphology of human pronuclear embryos is positively related to blastocyst development and implantation. Hum Reprod 15:2394–2403
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Melanie Glander for starting the PGS laboratory part, Prof. Dr. Reiner Siebert and Dr. Almuth Caliebe, University Institute for Human Genetics, for support of the study by genetic counselling and Ms Kerstin Koch for her meticulous registration of the data.
Conflict of interest
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical standards
The PGS study was registered and approved by the Ethics Commission of the Medical Faculty of the Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmutzler, A.G., Acar-Perk, B., Weimer, J. et al. Oocyte morphology on day 0 correlates with aneuploidy as detected by polar body biopsy and FISH. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289, 445–450 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2944-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2944-3