Abstract
Purpose
To determine the impact of intraoperative ultrasound on robotic-assisted radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombectomy in renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed intraoperative records of 27 patients with RCC and invasion of the IVC who underwent robotic-assisted nephrectomy with tumor thrombectomy at our center between December 2017 and July 2018. Diagnostic utility and impact of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), intraoperative robotic-assisted ultrasonography, and intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) on surgical management were extracted from the surgical notes and intraoperative ultrasound reports.
Results
Twenty-seven patients with thrombus had intraoperative ultrasound. Complete tumor removal was achieved in 22 patients, IVC transection in 5 patients, and no residual tumor was observed in all patients. Intraoperative TEE changed the robotic surgical strategy in three patients by monitoring thrombus-level regression. Downstaging of the thrombus level occurred in three patients: Levels IV to III in one and Levels III to II in two. Intraoperative robotic-assisted ultrasonography has facilitated safe VC clamp placement and identification and protection of collateral vessels during IVC transection in five patients. Intraoperative CEUS helped to differentiate the boundary between tumor thrombus (enhancement and small vessel pulsation) and bland thrombus (hypoechoic or no enhancement) in eight (29.6%) patients with bland thrombus.
Conclusions
Intraoperative ultrasound is a safe, minimally invasive technique that can provide accurate real-time information regarding the presence and extent of IVC involvement and guidance for placement of a vena cava clamp, confirming the character of the thrombus to plan an optimal surgical approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has a tendency to extend from the kidney to its route of venous drainage, with 4%–10% of these extending into the inferior vena cava (IVC) [1]. With the development of laparoscopy and robotic technology in recent years, several centers have reported successful laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy [2,3,4,5,6]. Our hospital took the lead in robot-assisted tumor thrombectomy in China and has proved the safety and effectiveness of this technique [7,8,9]. It is important to precisely identify the cranial extent of a thrombus prior to surgery i to plan the best surgical approach [10]. The most commonly used imaging investigations include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), multidetector helical computerized tomography, and transabdominal ultrasound scanning. Each of these techniques has its own advantages [11,12,13]; however, these imaging scans are performed before surgery and the patients are in a state of high blood coagulation. In some cases, the tumor thrombus may progress or new bland thrombus may form after imaging and before surgery [14]. The greatest drawback of traditional laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery is the lack of tactile feedback compared to open surgery. Intraoperative real-time ultrasound can compensate for this weakness through precise positioning and real-time imaging of the target tissue. Intraoperative ultrasound is a multimodal medical technique that allows visualization of tissues beyond the two-dimensional laparoscopic image, enhancing the amount and quality of information available to the surgeon [15]. However, data to show its utility and impact on surgical decision-making are lacking. In the present study, we undertook a retrospective review of patients with RCC and IVC invasion to determine the utility and impact of intraoperative ultrasound on the robot-assisted radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy.
Materials and methods
Study participants
After receiving Institutional Review Board approval, we retrospectively analyzed data from 27 patients with RCC and Levels I–IV IVC invasion who underwent robotic-assisted radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy between December 2017 and July 2018 (Table 1). Exclusion criteria for this study included: (1) patients with more than one metastatic site; (2) patients with poor heart and lung function, who could not tolerate surgery; and (3) patients who did not want to risk the surgery, or refused surgery. For each patient, hospital records and all of the preoperative radiographic studies were reviewed. All patients were preoperatively evaluated with routine blood analysis, chest X-ray, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and contrast venacavography; all of these examinations were performed within 7 days prior to the operation. We reviewed all cases to identify the level of tumor thrombus based on the classification system originally described by Blute et al. [1]. Patients were then divided into four levels (I–IV) based on the cranial extent of the thrombus. All procedures were performed by two surgeons (Xu Zhang and Xin Ma) with advanced robot-assisted laparoscopic skills.
Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)
Intraoperative TEE was performed in 20 patients with Level II–IV thrombus. Patients with tumor involvement of the renal vein only or within the IVC but ≤ 2 cm from the renal vein ostium were not investigated. Under general anesthesia, a multiplane TEE probe was placed in the esophagus to observe the location and movement of the tumor thrombus during surgery. After excision of the thrombus, the repaired VC was assessed by TEE for residual thrombus. No complication was caused by TEE. Information obtained by TEE examination was reviewed, and diagnostic utility and impact on surgical management were extracted from the surgical notes and TEE report. The diagnostic utility of intraoperative TEE was defined by its capacity to: (1) supplement preoperative radiological findings; (2) monitor and diagnose pulmonary embolism or emboli; (3) confirm complete tumor removal; and (4) identify residual tumor. This information impacts: (1) decisions to initiate cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB); (2) decisions to avoid CPB; (3) decisions to avoid controlling the suprahepatic IVC and mobilization of both lobes of the liver; and (4) guiding IVC clamp placement.
Intraoperative robotic-assisted ultrasonography (IOU)
Twenty-seven patients with IVC thrombus underwent IOU. An ultrasound doctor who was a board-certified radiologist was present in each case to perform ultrasound and help provide interpretation of the scan. There were no physicians involved in the ultrasound procedure. A ProART robotic transducer 8826 (BK Medical) was used for intraoperative ultrasonography. The TilePro was selected to observe the images on the robotic console, which allowed simultaneous vision of both the operative field and ultrasound images. After entry into the peritoneal cavity, sterile saline warmed to body temperature was poured into the operative field to create an acoustic interface between the ultrasound probe and whatever organ structure had to be examined. A diagnostic ultrasound unit with 10-MHz linear array transducer was placed in a sterile plastic sheath filled with sterile gel. Generally, the transducer was handled by the surgeon under the guidance of an ultrasonographer. The results obtained with IOU were then compared to the real extension of the thrombus after incision of the wall of the VC and before removal of the tumor thrombus. The diagnostic utility of IOU was defined by its capacity to: (1) supplement preoperative radiological findings; (2) monitor and diagnose bland thrombus; (3) confirm complete tumor removal; (4) identify residual tumor; and (5) identify collateral circulation. This information impacts: (1) guiding IVC clamp placement, and (2) decisions to protect the collateral circulation.
Intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)
Twenty-seven patients with IVC thrombus underwent intraoperative CEUS. CEUS is an advanced technique that utilizes ultrasound contrast agents to improve thrombus visualization. Microbubbles vibrate under the pressure changes induced by the probe transmitter. This oscillation produces energy that is detected by the transducer and converted into an image [16, 17]. As an effective diagnostic modality, this method leads to better, enhanced scanning of the microvasculature of the thrombus. The ultrasound contrast agent acts as a blood pool tracer and there is enhancement of echogenicity with areas of high blood flow, as seen with RCC lesions [18]. The contrast microbubble agent used in the CEUS procedure is nonallergenic and does not interfere with renal function, as it is not excreted by the kidneys. In this study, we used the contrast agent SonoVue (Bracco, Milan, Italy); a second-generation ultrasound contrast agent composed of sulfur hexafluoride gas and phospholipid monolayer shell. Before the examination, a 5-mL dose of SonoVue was bolus injected via a forearm vein through a 20-gauge cannula, followed by 5-mL normal saline flush using a three-way stopcock to ensure that no residual contrast agent remained in the intravenous catheter. The injection of contrast material into a peripheral vein allowed detection of thrombus microcirculation.
Evaluation of the CEUS finding was conducted as follows. Tumor thrombus: enhancement and small vessel pulsation of the thrombus, witnessed in real time. Bland thrombus: hypoechoic thrombus with no enhancement. The diagnostic utility of intraoperative CEUS was defined by its capacity to monitor and diagnose bland thrombus. This information impacts: (1) guiding IVC clamp placement in cases with cephalic bland thrombus; and (2) guiding IVC ligate placement in cases with caudal bland thrombus. If the presence of bland thrombus was confirmed by CEUS, cephalic bland thrombus and short caudal bland thrombus were treated as tumor thrombus. For patients with long caudal bland thrombus associated with tumor thrombus, in which the thrombus filled the IVC lumen and where there was excellent collateral circulation, we simply ligated the IVC above and below the thrombus using an Endo GIA stapler.
Results
Clinicopathological characteristics and surgical robotic techniques
We enrolled 27 patients with histologically confirmed RCC with thrombus, and the clinicopathological characteristics are described in Table 1. These tumors were classified according to the thrombus cephalad extension into the venous system [1], and the thrombus Level was I in seven patients (25.9%), II in 14 patients (51.9%), III in three patients (11.1%), and IV in three patients (11.1%). Robotic technology was utilized for all of the 27 patients with IVC thrombectomy.
We adopted the robotic techniques that depend on the level of venous thrombus, which were earlier described and summarized by our department [7,8,9]. For the thrombus inferior to the first porta hepatis (Level I and part of Level II), we ligated some short hepatic veins; for a thrombus between the first porta hepatis and second porta hepatis (Level II), we mobilized the right lobe of the liver from the IVC by ligating additional short hepatic veins; for a thrombus near or above the second porta hepatis but below the diaphragm (Level III), we mobilized both the right and left lobes of the liver to obtain high proximal control of the suprahepatic and infradiaphragmatic IVC, and simultaneously clamped the first porta hepatis. For a thrombus above the diaphragm and in the right atrium (Level IV), we established cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and thoracoscopy-assisted thrombectomy was performed for the intra-atrial part of the thrombus under CPB; the infradiaphragmatic part was completed in a manner similar to that for Level III. All nine patients with left-sided tumors and seven of 18 patients with right-sided tumors received preoperative artery embolization on the day of surgery that aimed to reduce intraoperative blood loss and technical difficulty. In five cases in which the thrombus filled the VC lumen and where there was excellent collateral circulation, we simply ligated the IVC above and below the thrombus-bearing IVC and renal vein using an Endo GIA stapler (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) with a 45-mm vascular load. There were six patients with preoperative therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
For right RCC of Levels I and II, patients were placed in a modified left lateral decubitus position with a 70° bump; in this position, IVC thrombectomy and radical nephrectomy could both be completed. For left RCC of Levels I and II, the position for IVC thrombectomy was the same as for right RCC. The placement of patients was converted to a modified right lateral decubitus position, and left radical nephrectomy was performed. For RCC of Levels III and IV, at first, the patient was placed in a 30°–45° dorsal elevated lithotomy position for liver mobilization.
In the presented cases, the involved kidney and tumor thrombus were removed by robot-assisted approach without significant operative morbidity or mortality, and without any massive pulmonary embolic episode due to migration of the thrombus. The median operation duration was 165 min (range 58–720 min), and the median estimated blood loss was 500 mL (range 20–15,000 mL). The intraoperative blood transfusion increased from Levels I to IV. However, the duration of hospitalization (range 4–29 days) showed no significant difference according to different level of thrombus. During a median follow-up of 12 months (range 10–20 months), there was no tumor embolus infringement of the IVC wall, positive lymph nodes, or distant metastasis.
Intraoperative TEE changes in robotic surgical strategy by monitoring thrombus-level regression
Of the 27 patients, 20 (except for Level I patients) underwent intraoperative TEE. Downstaging of the thrombus level occurred in three patients: Level IV to III in one (Fig. 1) and Level III to II in two (Fig. 2). The thrombus levels in the other patients remained stable; none of the 20 patients experienced upstaging. The surgical strategy was re-evaluated in three patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy. For one patient (downstaged from Level IV to III), a thoracoscope-assisted open atriotomy and CPB were avoided owing to intraoperative TEE. Two patients (downstaged from Level III to II) avoided height-proximal control of the suprahepatic IVC and mobilization of both lobes of the liver during robotic surgery; thus reducing surgical risk. Three patients with Level IV underwent CPB after TEE aided in the monitoring of intraoperative pulmonary embolism. Three patients with Level III had the IVC clamp placed with TEE guidance so as to avoid residual tumor thrombus. TEE showed complete resection in three patients with Level IV and CPB was not restarted for complete removal. All probes were placed according to plan at the onset of the case.
Intraoperative robotic-assisted ultrasonography is essential for identification of collateral vessels during IVC transection
Intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasound probes were used in all 27 patients to identify and demarcate the extent of the IVC thrombus. The longitudinal view of the IVC demonstrated the cranial site of the thrombus, which was necessary to evaluate the distance between the thrombus and the site of the temporary IVC clamp for thrombectomy. The VC was dissected to allow a 1–2-cm margin distal to the thrombus to ensure complete removal of the thrombus. Five patients (18.5%) in whom the thrombus filled the VC lumen, and with excellent collateral circulation, underwent IVC resection during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. Flexible intraoperative ultrasonography identified the extent of the thrombus before stapling the IVC, and protected the established collateral circulation as much as possible. In the event of IVC interruption (Fig. 3), collateral venous flow was maintained by minimizing ligation of the venous tributaries.
Intraoperative CEUS helped to differentiate the boundary between tumor and bland thrombi
Technical success for intraoperative CEUS was achieved in all 27 patients. No adverse events occurred during administration of the contrast agent. Early enhancement of a mass within the IVC lumen on CEUS was an indicator of tumor thrombus, and bland thrombus showed no intraluminal flow on CEUS (Fig. 4). There were eight (29.6%) patients with bland thrombus, including three Level II, two Level III, and three Level IV. There were three cases with cephalic bland thrombus and five with caudal bland thrombus. Three caudal bland thrombi extended to the iliac vein and underwent surgical IVC segmental transection during IVC thrombectomy. The intraoperative CEUS guided IVC clamp placement in five cases with bland thrombus to ensure the site of the clamp, and guided IVC ligate placement of three cases with caudal bland thrombus to ensure the Endo GIA stapler was below the caudal tumor thrombus.
Discussion
The emergence of intraoperative ultrasonography has helped to resolve the problem of laparoscopy not being able to touch organs directly, thus lacking any tactile feedback that can assist in the detection of tumor boundaries, as well as the extent of tumor thrombi [15, 19]. Intraoperative ultrasonography has become an important tool that has improved the rates of successful surgery, and has been applied to early and locally advanced RCC, monitoring ablation therapy, testing renal blood perfusion, and exposing renal pedicles [20,21,22,23,24]. Sonographic techniques used intraoperatively include TEE, robotic-assisted ultrasonography, and CEUS.
Surgery was performed for metastatic disease in six patients in our study. Some retrospective studies have confirmed that cytoreductive nephrectomy is associated with significantly improved overall survival in de novo metastatic RCC. The incremental survival benefit associated with cytoreductive nephrectomy was seen irrespective of neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio [25]. Treatment with molecular-targeted agents following cytoreductive nephrectomy may improve survival of patients with metastatic RCC compared with immunotherapy alone, and it may be important to use aggressive systemic treatment for patients with increased preoperative C-reactive protein [26]. According to the 2018 European Association of Urology guidelines, cytoreductive nephrectomy has been an option in low-risk patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cancer who present with the tumor in place [27].
Intraoperative TEE provides real-time accurate delineation of thrombus and, thus, has the potential to alter surgical decision-making and management. This benefit has been previously described in smaller case series and case reports [28, 29], but a review in robotic-assisted radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy for RCC has been lacking. In the present study, the use of TEE changed robotic-assisted surgical management in three patients. CPB was avoided in one patient who had preoperative documentation of Level IV thrombus. The ability to avoid CPB is important because it prevents exposure of the patient to the inherent physiological and mechanical risks of CPB. Two patients (downstaged from Level III to II) avoided height-proximal control of the suprahepatic IVC and mobilization of both lobes of the liver during robotic surgery, thus reducing surgical risk. We focused on the possible causes of intraoperative degradation: (1) preoperative renal artery embolism, decreased blood supply and volume of thrombus; (2) change from supine to lateral position increased the distance between the renal vein and atrium; (3) pneumoperitoneal pressure elevated the diaphragm and increased the length of the subphrenic IVC; (4) squeezed atrium, increased pressure in the right atrium, blocked venous reflux, increased pressure in the IVC and increased volume; (5) influence of anesthesia on circulation, decrease in returned blood volume, and decrease in the pushing force of the thrombus; and (6) the thrombus did not invade the IVC wall, and the above factors may lead to relative displacement of the thrombus. As illustrated by our recent study, since the information obtained from intraoperative TEE frequently influenced the surgical decision-making, particularly in patients with intracardiac tumor extension, we recommend that intraoperative TEE should be considered in all patients with Level II–IV tumor thrombi.
Intraoperative ultrasound probes are recommended in patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy. The robotic ultrasound probe angle can be adjusted with the robotic instrument [30]. The robotic ultrasound probe also eliminates the issue of instrument clashing in the operating field [28]. RCC tumor progression may be rapid, and from the time of initial imaging to the time of surgery, the tumor extent can change significantly [31]. Intraoperative ultrasound not only provides the tumor extent on the day of surgery but also enables simultaneous re-evaluation of tumor mobility or immobility. In cases in which the thrombus fills the VC lumen and when there is excellent collateral circulation, the surgeon simply ligates the IVC above and below the thrombus-bearing IVC and renal vein using an Endo GIA stapler. As soon as adequate hemostasis is achieved, the thrombus is transected at the level of the renal vein, which we reported in 2018 [8, 9]. In the present study, five cases were in this situation, and flexible intraoperative ultrasonography identified the thrombus extent before stapling the IVC, and protected the established collateral circulation as much as possible. The venous drainage of the remaining kidney was restored, which was confirmed by pre- and postoperative IVC cavography.
Embolization of bland and tumor thrombi to the pulmonary circulation is potentially a fatal complication in patients undergoing radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy for the surgical management of RCC [32]. Pulmonary embolism is a rare complication, but it has been described [33] and mortality is high. Tumor thrombus behaves differently from bland thrombus because it contains organized tumor cells and is more stable. Bland thrombus and extension into the VC may increase the likelihood of thrombus embolization. According to a new report, the presence of bland thrombus is associated with adverse survival outcomes in patients treated surgically for renal tumors with venous tumor thrombi [34]. Therefore, it is essential to judge the coexistence of bland thrombus; however, the echogenicity between these thrombi is poorly discriminated. The superior performance of CEUS in the present study is a result of its ability to detect and demonstrate tiny vessels in tumor thrombi and no enhancement in bland thrombi. In contrast to CT and MRI contrast agents, microbubbles used in CEUS remain in the intravascular space, thus displaying thrombus vascularization rather than extravascular diffusion of the contrast agent. The greatest advantage of CEUS is that it allows for real-time observation. This is a limitation of CT and MRI; enhancement of tumor thrombus can be missed when phase scans are not optimally timed or when patient respiration is poorly controlled. To our knowledge, we present the first report to evaluate the utility and impact of intraoperative CEUS on robotic-assisted surgical management on this unique patient population.
Conclusions
Intraoperative TEE, robotic-assisted ultrasound, and CEUS are useful tools that can accurately assess the precise extent and characteristics of thrombi to plan an optimal surgical approach. Real-time monitoring of IVC thrombus and the cardiopulmonary system during robotic-assisted radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy for RCC is an area in need of further investigation. Larger randomized studies are required to determine the true benefits of intraoperative ultrasound monitoring in this patient population.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- RCC:
-
Renal cell carcinoma
- IVC:
-
Inferior vena cava
- CEUS:
-
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound
- TT:
-
Tumor thrombus
- BT:
-
Bland thrombus
- RA:
-
Right atrium
- RHV:
-
Right hepatic vein
- MHV:
-
Middle hepatic vein
- LHV:
-
Left hepatic vein
References
Blute ML, Leibovich BC, Lohse CM, Cheville JC, Zincke H (2004) The Mayo Clinic experience with surgical management, complications and outcome for patients with renal cell carcinoma and venous tumour thrombus. BJU Int 94:33–41
Romero FR, Muntener M, Bagga HS, Brito FAR, Sulman A, Jarrett TW (2006) Pure laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with level II vena caval thrombectomy. Urology 68:1112–1114
Martin GL, Castle EP, Martin AD, Desai PJ, Lallas CD, Ferrigni RG et al (2008) Outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in the setting of vena caval and renal vein thrombus: seven-year experience. J Endourol 22:1681–1685
Wang W, Wang L, Xu J, Tian Y, Lv W (2014) Pure retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for right renal masses with renal vein and inferior vena cava thrombus. J Endourol 28:819–824
Wang W, Xu J, Adams TS, Tian Y, Lv W (2014) Pure retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for left renal call carcinoma with differential extensions of level I renal vein rumor thrombus. J Endourol 28:312–317
Hoang AN, Vaporcyian AA, Matin SF (2010) Laparoscopy-assisted radical nephrectomy with inferior vena caval thrombectomy for level II to III tumor thrombus: a single-institution experience and review of the literature. J Endourol 24:1005–1012
Wang B, Li H, Ma X, Zhang X, Gu L, Li X et al (2016) Robot-assisted laparoscopic inferior vena cava thrombectomy: different sides require different techniques. Eur Urol 69:1112–1119
Wang B, Li H, Huang Q, Liu K, Fan Y, Peng C et al (2018) Robot-assisted retrohepatic inferior vena cava thombectomy: first or second porta hepatis as an important boundary landmark. Eur Urol 74:512–520
Wang B, Huang Q, Liu K et al (2019) Robot-assisted Level III–IV inferior vena cava thrombectomy: initial series with step-by-step procedures and 1-yr outcomes. Eur Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.019
Gu L, Ma X, Gao Y, Li H, Li X, Chen L et al (2017) Robot-versus open level I–II inferior Vena Cava thrombectomy: a matched group comparative analysis. J Urol 198:1241–1246
Adams LC, Ralla B, Bender YY et al (2018) Renal cell carcinoma with venous extension: prediction of inferior vena wall invasion by MRI. Cancer Imaging 18(1):17
Aslam Sohaib SA, The J, Nargund VH et al (2002) Assessment of tumor invasion of the vena caval wall in renal cell carcinoma cases by magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 167:1271–1275
Stern PR, Perkov D, Smiljanic R et al (2007) Venous spread of renal cell carcinoma: MDCT. Abdom Imading 32(4):530–537
Hutchinson R, Rew C, Chen G et al (2018) The adverse survival implications of bland thrombus in renal cell carcinoma with venous tumor thrombus. Urology 115:119–124
Matin SF, Gill IS (2001) Laparoscopic ultrasonography. J Endourol 15:87–92
O,Neal D, Cohen T, Peterson C, Barr RG. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors. J Kidney Cancer VHL 2018;5:7–14
Alenezi AN, Karim O (2015) Role of intra-operative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in robotic-assisted nephron-sparing surgery. J Robot Surg 9:1–10
Alenezi A, Motiwala A, Eves S, Gray R, Thomas A, Meiers I et al (2017) Robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using contrast-enhanced ultrasound scan to map renal bold flow. Int J Med Robot 13:e1738
Liu B, Zhan Y, Chen X, Xie Q, Wu B (2018) Laparoscopic ultrasonography: the wave of the future in renal cell carcinoma? Endosc Ultrsound 7:161–167
Steinnerd LE, Vardi IY, Bhayani SB (2007) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal carcinoma with known level I renal vein tumor thrombus. Uroloy 69:662–665
Hekma MC, Rijpkema M, Langenhuijsen JF, Boerman OC, Oosterwijk E, Mulders PFA. Intraoperative imaging techniques to support complete tumor resection in partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol Focus 2017. Pii:S2405-4569(17):30114-1
Wang M, Ping H, Niu Y, Zhang J, Xing N (2014) Pure conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with level vena cava tumor thrombectomy. Int Br J Urol 40:266–273
Yang R, Lian H, Zhang G, Wang W, Gan W, Li X et al (2014) Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation with intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for T1bN0M0 renal tumors: initial functional and oncologic outcomes. J Endourol 28:4–9
Badger WJ, de Araujo HA, Kuehn DM, Angresen KJ, Winfield HN (2009) Laparoscopic renal tumor cryoablation: appropriate application of real-time ultrasonographic monitoring. J Endourol 23:427–430
Day D, Kanjanapan Y, Kwan E et al (2016) Benefit from cytoreductive nephrectomy and the prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Int Med J 46(11):1291–1297
Sakai I, Miyake H, Hinata N et al (2014) Improved survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy in the era of targeted therapy. Int J Chin Oncol 19(4):674–678
Bex A, Albiges L, Ljungberg B et al (2018) Updated European Association of urology guidelines for cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 74(6):805–809
Oikawa T, Shimazui T, Johraku A, Kihara S, Tsukamoto S, Miyanaga N et al (2004) Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography for inferior vena caval tumor thrombus in renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol 11:189–192
Kostibas MP, Arora V, Gorin MA, Ball MW, Pierorazion PM, Allaf ME et al (2017) Defining the role of intraoperative transesohpageal echocardiography during radical nephrectomy with inferior Vena Cava tumor thrombectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Urology 107:161–165
Kaczmarek BF, Sukumar S, Kumar RK, Desa N, Jost K, Diaz M et al (2013) Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic ultrasound probes for robotic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 27:1137–1140
Kaczmarek BF, Sukumar S, Petros F, Trinh QD, Mander N, Chen R et al (2013) Robotic ultrasound probe for tumor identification in robotic partial nephrectomy: Initial series and outcomes. Int J Urol 20:172–176
Lee A (2008) VTE in patients with cancer-diagnosis, prevention and treatment. Thromb Res 123(Suppl. 1):S50–S54
Lambert EH, Pierorazio PM, Shabsigh A, Olsson CA, Benson MC, McKiernan JM (2007) Prognostic risk stratification and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing surgical treatment for renal cell carcinoma with vascular tumor thrombus. Urology 69:1054
Hutchinson R, Rew C, Chen G, Wodu S, Krabbe LM, Meissner M et al (2018) The adverse survival implications of bland thrombus in renal cell carcinoma with venous tumor thrombus. Urology 115:119–124
Acknowledgements
We would like to extend our gratitude to our head of department for support. We also thank our engineers, nurses, and other staff of the department.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 81801698).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LQY and LYK conceived of the present study. TJ and ZX supervised the project. LN and YHK acquired, analyzed and interpreted the patient data regarding ultrasound imaging and surgical findings. LQY was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. MX gave technical support and conceptual advice. All author read and revised the manuscript critically, approving the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this study and any accompanying images.
Ethical approval
This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Chinese PLA General Hospital (No. S2017-100-01).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, Q., Li, N., Luo, Y. et al. Role of intraoperative ultrasound in robotic-assisted radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy in renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 38, 3191–3198 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03141-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03141-y