Abstract
A research project carried out in Santa Giusta lagoon, Sardinia, since 2005 has revealed the presence of Phoenician and Punic waterlogged archaeological contexts of exceptional importance. Several transport amphorae, together with Punic coarse pottery and materials typical of funerary and votive contexts have been recovered. Two principal deposition phases have been distinguished, the first one dated to the 6th–5th century bc and the second dated to the 3rd−2nd century bc. The waterlogged conditions favoured the preservation of plant remains such as Citrullus lanatus, Corylus avellana, Juglans regia, Juniperus oxycedrus, Lagenaria siceraria, Olea europaea, Pinus pinea, P. halepensis, Prunus dulcis, P. domestica, P. spinosa and Vitis vinifera. Many amphorae contained ovine/caprine bones with slaughter or butchering marks, associated with grapes and other juicy fruits that have been interpreted as possible ingredients used as meat preservatives. This study provides information on the management of plants of economic importance for the Phoenician and Punic communities in Sardinia.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Agricultural issues have occupied an important position in the development of Phoenician and Punic (Carthaginian) archaeology in recent years. In modern historiography, Punic agricultural prosperity has often been highlighted, and a significant place has been given to Mago and his 28 volume agricultural treatise which was translated into Latin by the Roman Senate as a proof of his renowned agrarian excellence (Domínguez Petit 2004). Leaving aside whether the fame of Punic agriculture is really mirrored in Mago’s work or, as has been suggested, its purpose enters into more philosophical and political realms (Krings 2007, 2008), it is remarkable that over the years so little attention has been paid to the analysis of plant remains as direct evidence of plant cultivation and the large amount of information that can be drawn from this.
Phoenician and Punic archaeobotany is still in its infancy. Apart from the seminal works of Van Zeist et al. (2001) and Kroll (2007) in Carthage and recent research still unpublished by López and Cantero (personal communication), work in Tunisia at the site of Althiburos (López and Cantero 2016) and some preliminary reports from the Iberian Peninsula (Chamorro 1994; Catalá 1999; Iborra et al. 2003; Pérez Jordà 2007; Pérez Jordà et al. 2017), research into the role of plants in Phoenician and Punic subsistence has been limited.
In Sardinia, plant remains are also scarce due to the lack of systematic recovery there. Except for a few cases (Wetterstrom 1987; Bakels 2002), proper sampling and the application of suitable recovery techniques have started to be applied only recently (Del Vais and Sanna 2009, 2012; Pérez Jordà et al. 2010; Buosi et al. 2014; Sabato et al. 2015; Ucchesu et al. 2015a, 2017a), producing results that can inform on the use of plants there in the past. Although the datasets are reduced, plant remains from the Phoenician and Punic periods in Sardinia have been studied from sites such as Ortu Comidu (Wetterstrom 1986), Pinn’e Maiolu (Bakels 2002), Nora (Marinval and Cassien 2001; Miola et al. 2009) and Truncu’e Molas (Pérez Jordà et al. 2010), demonstrating the presence of cereals (free-threshing wheats and barley), legumes (broad beans and lentils) and fruits (grapes).
The main objective of this work is to explore the range of plants used during the Phoenician and Punic periods and to contribute to the development of archaeobotany in Sardinia.
Archaeological context
The lagoon of Santa Giusta is located in central-west Sardinia, on the Gulf of Oristano (39°521′57546″N, 8°35′21798″E). It has a circular shape, with a maximum area of 900 ha and a depth ranging from 0.4 to 1.5 m (Fig. 1). The waterlogged site there has been excavated since 2005 by the archaeological authorities, Soprintendenza Archeologia belle arti e paesaggio per la città metropolitana di Cagliari e per le province di Oristano e Sud Sardegna, and the University of Cagliari (Del Vais and Sanna 2009, 2012). This area is close to the ancient city of Othoca, located on the north-east side of the lagoon (Del Vais 2010).
The areas of highest concentration of the archaeological material were identified by systematic exploration of vast tracts of the north-eastern part of the lagoon. Under the mud, Del Vais and Sanna (2009) detected two main contexts dating from the 6th and the 2nd century bc called Area A and Area B. In Area A which is discussed here (Fig. 1), a large amount of pottery was discovered, especially transport amphorae containing animal remains and seeds, mixed with branches, wood fragments and wooden objects. The majority of transport amphorae were found almost intact and contained animal bones with traces of slaughter (Del Vais and Sanna 2009, 2012; Portas et al. 2015). The amphorae from the most ancient context appear to be related to either type T-1.2.1.2. (Ramon Torres 1995), dating to the first two-thirds of the 6th century bc, or type T-1.4.4.1., dated to the 5th century bc (Del Vais and Sanna 2009, 2012). Among the late Punic amphorae, there is a prevalence of those with an elongated cylindrical body of type T-5.2.2.1., with a sloping shoulder and indistinct edge externally, and of type T-5.2.1.3., with a more pronounced shoulder and distinct edge, both dating to the 3rd–2nd century bc (Del Vais and Sanna 2009, 2012).
Most of the transport amphorae seem to have been locally produced as proved by the archaeometric analysis conducted in collaboration with the University of Urbino (Amadori et al. 2016). Much of this pottery was still intact and preserved the original content, which is an important indicator of the economic activity that took place during the Phoenician and Punic periods in the territory of the city of Othoca. Food processing activities carried out at the site included the use of food preservatives needed to transport perishable foodstuffs in ships.
Almost all the amphorae were used for transporting meat, from domestic species: Ovis aries (sheep), Capra hircus (goat) and Bos taurus (cattle) (Portas et al. 2015).
Materials and methods
During the excavation, the use of a large submerged metal fence for the protection of the excavation area and the sieving of the sediments using filters of different sizes allowed recovery of a total of 31 sediment samples that were collected from inside the amphorae and another 51 samples from the deposition layers using a sub-aquatic pump (Del Vais and Sanna 2009, 2012).
Among the amphorae, 13 were dated to the 6th–5th centuries bc and 18 to the 3rd–2nd centuries bc. Regarding the samples collected from the deposition layers, 11 were attributed to the 3rd–2nd centuries bc. Due to the difficulty of ascribing the soft silt layers to specific chronologies, the other 40 deposition layers were not classified into a specific period. It is likely we are dealing with part of the amphorae contents which were spread around due to breakage in antiquity.
The samples were water sieved during the excavation with a coarse mesh of 2 mm, according to the excavation methods being used then. The waterlogged material was kept in distilled water and stored in a fridge at + 5 °C at the Sardinian Germplasm Bank (BG-SAR) of the Hortus Botanicus Karalitanus. Identifications were carried out using a Leica M165C binocular microscope and a magnification range of 73× to 120× and with the reference collection of the BG-SAR.
Results
The samples provided more than 3,512 macro-remains that were found to be in an excellent state of preservation (Table 1). A wide range of plant taxa was identified (Figs. 2, 3) including Olea europaea (olive), Prunus domestica (plum), Prunus dulcis (almond), Prunus spinosa (sloe), Vitis vinifera (grape), Juniperus oxycedrus (prickly juniper), Corylus avellana (hazelnut), Juglans regia (walnut) and Pinus pinea (pine nut). The latter specimen was found also as a complete pine cone together with cones of P. halepensis (Aleppo pine) (Fig. 3). Furthermore, two seeds of Citrullus lanatus (watermelon) and a single seed of Lagenaria siceraria (bottle gourd) were identified. The majority of the taxa were found in the amphorae and in deposition layers dated to the 3rd–2nd century bc, and most of them were identified in both types of deposit. A large number of seeds of the aquatic Potamogeton sp. (pondweed) were also recorded in all samples.
Discussion
The biological remains analysed in this paper are mainly composed of plants of economic importance, of which fruits are the dominant category. The absence of small wild or cultivated seed or fruit remains is probably related to the use of a 2 mm mesh during the sieving process. A new protocol has been agreed with the archaeologists for future analyses.
There are no significant differences between the samples from amphorae and depositional layers. Cereals and legumes are probably absent as waterlogging does not favour their preservation. The most abundant taxon is Vitis (grape), which has been recovered from all contexts and periods. Due to the high concentration of remains in some of the vessels, particularly in the oldest material, some of the amphorae might have contained grapes or dried raisins.
Many of the amphorae contained remains of ovine/caprine bones suggesting the trading of pieces of meat from sheep or goat. Meat was preserved using an unknown method, but probably using various additives; this could explain the presence of grape pips.
In addition, textual evidence points to the role of wine as an ingredient in many foods such as meat marinades, fish sauces, cheeses and desserts (McGovern 1999). Grapes as well as other fruit such as plums and perhaps sloes (identified among the archaeobotanical remains) may have played a role in meat preservation. Sampels (2013) emphasized the antioxidant capacity of many fruits, spices and berries such as plums and grapes due to their content of phenols, anthocyanins and ascorbic acid. Furthermore, the modern food industry uses plum products and grape seed extracts in food processing for improving the colour of finished meat (Karre et al. 2013). Other plant parts such as the strong-scented berries of Juniperus oxycedrus (prickly juniper), which have been found at the site and grow widely in Sardinia, were used as additives to improve wine flavour (Atzei 2003). Similar examples of grape pips associated with ovine/caprine bones are also known from amphorae from Nora (Poplin 1980; Marinval and Cassien 2001). Furthermore, a 10th century ad recipe reported from Didimo in Geoponica Book 19th 9.5 suggests the use of grape pressing residues without separating the skin from the berry, to preserve salted meat of sheep, goat and deer (Meana et al. 1998). The remains found at Nora were interpreted this way (André 1981). For Santa Giusta, this could be also the case, at least for some of the grape pips found. Such a practice would have found a use for the grape pressing waste produced in the numerous wineries active in the area (Pérez Jordà et al. 2010). Grape pollen was recorded in the 5th century bc levels and later in Tharros (Acquaro et al. 2001) and again at the transition from the Middle Bronze Age to the Punic period (approx. from 3,500 to 2,500 cal bp) in Lago de Mistras (Di Rita and Melis 2013). Grape pollen and pips have been found in huge amounts in the same area since the Bronze Age (Lovicu et al. 2011; Orrù et al. 2013; Ucchesu et al. 2015b).
Grape pips may also have come from amphorae, which contained wine as, in antiquity, wine could include grape residues such as pedicels, skins and pips. It remains unclear whether their variable presence in the archaeological record represented different grades of wine quality. Apart from grape pips, none of these remains have been reported from Santa Giusta.
In some of the amphorae, there is evidence of a coating with pitch to reduce their permeability (Del Vais and Sanna 2009, 2012). One of the commonest materials used for vessel coating was pine resin, which as well as waterproofing the pottery also added a pleasant flavour to the wine. It also helped to preserve the wine by preventing oxygen from entering through the pores of the clay and therefore avoiding the bacterial activity responsible for the conversion of wine into vinegar. It has been suggested that it also contributed to lessen unpleasant taste or odour (McGovern et al. 1996). Pliny, in his Natural History (Rackham and Jones 1975), described the use of pine pitch for lining storage jars. Pine resin from Aleppo pine has been traditionally used in Greece to produce retsina, a popular resinated wine (McGovern at al. 1996).
Several pine cones were found, from two different species, P. halepensis and P. pinea from which seeds have also been identified. Their presence in the samples is difficult to interpret. In antiquity, pine cones sealed with clay were used as stoppers in amphorae (Twede 2002), while being steeped in the wine they helped to avoid the wine becoming vinegar. However, to enhance the flavour and aroma of wine, additives other than resin were also used, from fruits, berries, spices, herbs, honey, etc.
The presence of walnuts, hazelnuts, almonds and pine nuts amongst the remains suggests that nuts were also part of the traded items. Although hazelnut and walnut are considered to be introduced plants in Sardinia (Podda et al. 2012), pollen of Corylus and Juglans is present in the same area from at least 5,300 bp (Di Rita and Melis 2013) and evident in the 5th century bc (Acquaro et al. 2001). Juglans is considered to be an indicator of human activities (Di Rita and Melis 2013). In northern Italy Corylus is recorded from the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition (Biagi et al. 2008; Boccacci and Botta 2009; Rottoli and Castiglioni 2009). As for the pine cones, P. halepensis (Aleppo pine) and P. pinea (stone pine) could have grown locally, although nowadays pines only thrive naturally in two restricted areas in the southwest, Porto Pino and Portixeddu-Buggerru (Mossa 1990). Walnuts, hazelnuts and pine nuts identified in Punic Carthage have been interpreted as exotic foods, since these plants do not grow naturally in that area (van Zeist et al. 2001). Thus, it is yet unclear whether these taxa were present in Sardinia before the Phoenician colonization or if the colonists introduced them.
Prunus endocarps have been found in small numbers in both amphorae and deposition layers. According to Ucchesu et al. (2017b), P. domestica remains from Santa Giusta match varieties currently cultivated in Sardinia, representing the oldest find in Italy from this period. Plums have also been recorded from Huelva, southern Spain, in Phoenician contexts dated to the late 9th century bc (Pérez Jordà et al. 2017), suggesting a link with Phoenician presence there.
The olive stones were of various shapes and sizes, perhaps representing different varieties belonging to cultivated and/or wild trees. The record of olives in Sardinia goes back to at least the Middle Bronze Age, 1800–1300 bc. Olive stones were identified at the site of Duos Nuraghes (Bakels 2002) and Olea pollen appears in Tharros (Acquaro et al. 2001) and in the Mistras pollen diagram (Di Rita and Melis 2013), where moderate frequencies (up to 5%) are detected between 5,300–1,600 bp, indicating that olive trees were growing in the surroundings of the site. Bearing in mind the enormous importance of the olive in the Mediterranean, it is surprising that olive cultivation was not a common practice in Sardinia (Di Rita and Melis 2013) according to the archaeobotanical data. The association of olive stones with amphorae remains open to various possibilities. On the one hand, olives or olive oil could have been traded, and on the other it is also possible that olives were ingredients of the meat dressing being transported.
Lagenaria (bottle gourd) was recorded in the latest phase, in a deposition layer dated to the 3rd–2nd century bc. It represents the oldest record from this area. Its presence might be related to its traditional use as a water container, a practice still common today in Sardinia and Africa and widespread during Roman times (Schlumbaum and Vandorpe 2012). However, since only a single seed was discovered, any hypothesis on its use is speculative. Similarly, the record of Citrullus (watermelon) is based only on two seeds and it is, at present, the oldest record of this taxon from the western Mediterranean. Recently, Paris (2015) has published a detailed review of ancient watermelon records, pointing out that the origin and domestication of dessert watermelon is probably located in north-eastern Africa and that it reached the Mediterranean basin around 2,000 years ago. Most of the oldest records and representations come from Egypt (Germer 1988; Hepper 1990; Janick et al. 2007), Libya (van der Veen 2011) and Sudan (van Zeist 1983). Wasylikowa and van der Veen (2004) suggested the possibility that some Egyptian seeds may have been erroneously identified as other Citrullus species. Further remains of watermelon seeds dated to the 1st millennium bc have been reported from the site of Raybun, in southern Arabia (Cox and van der Veen 2008; Levkovskaya and Filatenko 1992), Samos, Greece (Kučan 1995) and Israel (Schultze-Motel 1974). For Europe, but also for northern Africa, remains have been retrieved from several sites dated to the Roman period (Castelletti at al. 2001; Rinaldi et al. 2013); for further details see Cox and van der Veen (2008) and Paris (2015). It is likely that watermelon, as well as bottle gourd, were known to the people of Carthage and their colonies in North Africa, although the lack of evidence before the classical period suggests that the spread of this plant probably occurred at a later stage.
Concerning the other wild plants, seeds of pondweed were probably within the sediment that filled the amphorae when they were deposited. This water plant thrives in shallow fresh water, but some species such as Potamogeton pectinatus, which is common in Santa Giusta lagoon, have shown some salinity tolerance (van Wijk et al. 1988).
Conclusions
Waterlogged plant remains from various amphorae used for the transport of goods and dated to two different periods, the 6th–5th and the 3rd–2nd centuries bc, were discovered in the seabed of Santa Giusta lagoon. Plant composition was similar in both assemblages, suggesting some continuity in the use of the plant taxa identified. However, many remains were also retrieved from deposition layers which are not easily attributable to either of the two phases. Taxa such as walnuts, hazelnuts and pine nuts were probably part of trade in specific categories of products with high commercial value. The relatively large size of the fruits suggests a strong selection of the best specimens.
The occurrence of juicy fruits, such as grapes and plums, together with animal bones with clear slaughter marks can be interpreted as evidence of a way of preserving meat as suggested by similar finds from other sites.
The discovery of two cucurbits, watermelon and bottle gourd, represents their oldest records in the western Mediterranean area. It is unlikely that these crops were locally cultivated since their introduction occurred only later, but they were probably known in North Africa.
The analysis of plant remains from Santa Giusta lagoon has allowed exploration of aspects of Phoenician and Punic trade in the Mediterranean basin. This is especially important because archaeobotanical data from these periods is rather scarce, not only in Sardinia but also in the rest of the Mediterranean. The data set discussed in this paper is a small part of the total available, so further research will certainly contribute to clarify many of other issues raised here and to improve our knowledge about Phoenician and Punic agriculture and diet.
References
Acquaro E, Caramiello R, Verga F, Ortu E, Arobba D (2001) Analyses palynologiques et anthracologiques du site phénicien-punique de Tharros (Sardaigne). Revue d’Archéometrie 25:45–51
Amadori ML, Del Vais C, Fermo P, Pallante P (2016) Archaeometric researches on the provenance of Mediterranean Archaic Phoenician and Punic pottery. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:13,921–13,949
André J (1981) L’alimentation et la cuisine à Rome. Les Belles Lettres, Paris
Atzei AD (2003) Le piante nella tradizione popolare della Sardegna: documentazione sugli usi alimentari, aromatizzanti, profumieri, artigianali, cosmetici, medicinali, veterinari, magici, ornamentali, rituali, religiosi, tintori, antiparassitari e vari, delle piante. Delfino Editore, Sassari
Bakels C (2002) Plant remains from Sardinia, Italy, with notes on barley and grape. Veget Hist Archaeobot 11:3–8
Biagi P, Starnini E, Voytek B (2008) The Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in the Trieste karst (north-eastern Italy) as seen from the excavations at the Edera cave. In: Bonsall C, Boroneant V, Radovanovic I (eds) The Iron Gates in prehistory: new perspectives. (BAR International Series 1893) Archaeopress, Oxford, pp 251–260
Boccacci P, Botta R (2009) Investigating the origin of hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) cultivars using chloroplast microsatellites. Genet Resour Crop Evol 56:851–859
Buosi C, Pittau P, Paglietti G, Scanu GG, Serra M, Ucchesu M, Tanda G (2014) A human occupation cave during the Bronze Age: archaeological and palynological applications of a case study in Sardinia (western Mediterranean). Archaeometry 57:212–231
Castelletti L, Castiglioni E, Rottoli M (2001) L’agricoltura dell’Italia settentrionale dal Neolitico al Medioevo. In: Failla O, Forni G (eds) Le piante coltivate e la loro storia. Dalle origini al transgenico in Lombardia nel centenario della riscoperta della genetica di Mendel. Franco Angeli Editore, Milano, pp 33–84
Catalá M (1999) La agricultura: los recursos vegetales a partir de las semillas y los frutos. In: Aubet ME, Carmona P, Curia E, Delgado A, Fernández A, Párraga M (eds) Cerro del Villar I. El asentamiento fenicio en la desembocadura del río Guadalhorce y su interacción con el hinterland. (Arqueología Monografías 5) Junta de Andalucía, Sevilla, pp 307–312
Chamorro J (1994) Flotation strategy: method and sampling plant dietary resources of Tartessian times at Doña Blanca. In: Roselló E, Morales A (eds) Castillo de Doña Blanca Archaeo-environmental investigations in the Bay of Cádiz (750–500 bc). (BAR International Series 593) Tempus Reparatum, Oxford, pp 21–35
Cox A, Van der Veen M (2008) Changing foodways: watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) consumption in Roman and Islamic Quseir al-Qadim, Egypt. Veget Hist Archaeobot 17:181–189
Del Vais C (2010) L’abitato fenicio-punico e romano. In: Coroneo R (ed) La Cattedrale di Santa Giusta. Architettura e arredi dall’XI al XIX secolo. Scuola Sarda Editrice, Cagliari, pp 35–46
Del Vais C, Sanna I (2009) Ricerche su contesti sommersi di età fenicia e punica nella laguna di Santa Giusta (OR) (campagne 2005–2007). Studi Sardi 34:123–149
Del Vais C, Sanna I (2012) Nuove ricerche subacquee nella laguna di Santa Giusta (OR) (campagna del 2009–2010). Archeo Arte Suppl 1:201–233
Di Rita F, Melis RT (2013) The cultural landscape near the ancient city of Tharros (central west Sardinia): vegetation changes and human impact. J Archaeol Sci 40:4,271–4,282
Domínguez Petit R (2004) Fuentes literarias para la agricultura cartaginesa: el tratado de Magón. Habis 35:179–192
Germer R (1988) Katalog der altägyptischen Pflanzenreste der Berliner Museen. (Ägyptologische Abhandlungen 47). Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden, pp 43–44
Hepper FN (1990) Pharaoh’s flowers: The botanical treasures of Tutankhamun. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
Iborra MP, Grau E, Pérez Jordà G (2003) Recursos agrícolas y ganaderos en el ámbito fenicio occidental: estado de la cuestión. In: Gómez Bellard C (ed) Ecohistoria del paisaje agrario: la agricultura fenicio-púnica en el Mediterráneo. Universitat de València, Valencia, pp 33–56
Janick J, Paris HS, Parrish DC (2007) The cucurbits of Mediterranean antiquity: identification of taxa from ancient images and descriptions. Ann Bot 100:1,441–1,457
Karre L, Lopez K, Getty KJK (2013) Natural antioxidants in meat and poultry products. Meat Sci 94:220–227
Krings V (2007) L’apport des sources littéraires classiques à notre connaissance de l’agriculture punique. In: Arruda AM, Gómez Bellard C, Van Dommelen P (eds) Sítios e paisagens rurais do Mediterrâneo Púnico. Actas do VI Congresso Internacional de Estudos Fenícios e Púnicos. (Cadernos da UNIARQ 3) Centro de Arqueologia de Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, pp 17–34
Krings V (2008) Rereading Punic agriculture: representation, analogy and ideology in the classical sources. In: Van Dommelen P, Gómez Bellard C (eds) Rural landscapes of the Punic world. (Monographs in Mediterranean Archaeology 11) Equinox, London, pp 22–43
Kroll H (2007) Die Pflanzenfunde. In: Niemeyer HG, Docter RF, Schmidt K (eds) Karthago: die Ergebnisse der Hamburger Grabung unter dem Decumanus Maximus. (Hamburger Forschungen zur Archäologie 2) Von Zabern, Mainz, pp 849–853
Kučan D (1995) Zur Ernährung und dem Gebrauch von Pflanzen im Heraion von Samos im 7. Jahrhundert v. Chr Jb DAI 110:1–64
Levkovskaya GM, Filatenko AA (1992) Palaeobotanical and palynological studies in South Arabia. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 73:241–257
López D, Cantero FJ (2016) Agriculture et alimentation à partir de l’étude des restes de graines et de fruits. In: Kallala N, Sanmartí J, Belarte C (eds) Althiburos II. L’aire du capitole et la nécropole meridionale: études. (Documenta 28) Institut. Català d’Arqueologia Clàssica, Tarragona, pp 449–490
Lovicu G, Labra M, De Mattia F, Farci M, Bacchetta G, Orrù M (2011) Prime osservazioni sui vinaccioli rinvenuti negli scavi di Sa Osa. In: Mastino A, Spanu PG, Usai A, Zucca R (eds) Tharros Felix 4. Carocci Editore, Roma
Marinval P, Cassien M (2001) Les pépins de raisin (Vitis vinifera L.) des amphores phénico-puniques de l’épave de Coltellazzo, Nora-Pula (Cagliari Sardaigne, Italie). In: Marinval P (ed) Histoires d’hommes, histoires de plantes (hommages au professeur Jean Erroux). Rencontres d’archéobotanique de Toulouse. Centre d’anthropologie, Toulouse, pp 122–130
McGovern PE (1999) Retsina, mixed fermented beverages, and the cuisine of Pre-Classical Greece. In: Tzedakis Y, Martlew H (eds) Minoans and Mycenaeans: flavours of their time. Greek Ministry of Culture and National Archaeological Museum, Athens, pp 206–209
McGovern PE, Glusker D, Exner L, Voigt M (1996) Neolithic resinated wine. Nature 381:480–481
Meana MJ, Cubero JI, Sáez P (1998) Geopónica o extractos de agricultura de Casiano Baso. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación. Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria, Madrid
Miola A, Da Ruos C, Sostizzo I, Uliana M (2009) I resti archeobotanici ed entomologici. In: Bonetto J, Falezza G, Ghiotto A, Nora R (eds) Il foro romano. Storia di un’area urbana dall’età fenicia alla tarda Antichità. I materiali. Italgraf, Padova, pp 909–919
Mossa L (1990) La vegetazione forestale del campo dunale di Buggerru-Portixeddu (Sardegna occidentale). Studi sul territorio. Ann Bot Roma 48:291–306
Orrù M, Grillo O, Lovicu G, Venora G, Bacchetta G (2013) Morphological characterisation of Vitis vinifera L. seeds by image analysis and comparison with archaeological remains. Veget Hist Archaeobot 22:231–242
Paris HS (2015) Origin and emergence of the sweet dessert watermelon, Citrullus lanatus. Ann Bot 116:133–148
Pérez Jordà G (2007) Estudio paleocarpológico. In: Rouillard P, Gailledrat É, Sala Sellés F (eds) Fouilles de la Ràbita de Guardamar II. L’établissement protohistorique de la Fonteta (fin VIII-fin VI siècle av. J.C.) 96. Casa de Velázquez, Madrid, pp 405–416
Pérez Jordà G, Morales Pérez J, Marlasca Martín R, Gómez Bellard C, Van Dommelen P (2010) La alimentación en una granja púnica de Cerdeña. In: Mata Parreño C, Pérez Jordà G, Vives-Ferrándiz Sánchez J (eds) De la Cuina a la Taula. IV Reunió d’Economia en el Primer Mil·lenni a.C. (Saguntum Extra 9) Valencia, pp 295–302
Pérez Jordà G, Peña-Chocarro L, García Fernández M, Vera Rodríguez JC (2017) The beginnings of fruit tree cultivation in the Iberian Peninsula: plant remains from the city of Huelva (southern Spain). Veget Hist Archaeobot 26:527–538
Podda L, Lazzeri V, Mascia F, Mayoral O, Bacchetta G (2012) The checklist of the Sardinian alien flora: an update. Not Bot Horti Agrobo Cluj-Napoca 40:14–21
Poplin F (1980) Les ossements animaux des amphores puniques de Nora I et II. In: Cassien M (ed) Campagne des sauvetages 1980 sur les sites sous-marins de Nora-Pula, Touring club de France, Paris, pp 76–90
Portas L, Farina V, Del Vais C, Carcupino M, Gazza F, Sanna I, Zedda M (2015) Anatomical study of animal remains from Phoenician-Punic amphorae found in the Santa Giusta Pond, Sardinia (Italy). J Biol Res 88:2
Rackham H, Jones WHS (1975) Pliny the Elder. Natural history. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Ramon Torres J (1995) Las ánforas fenicio-púnicas del Mediterráneo central y occidental. (Instrumenta 2) Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona
Rinaldi R, Bandini Mazzanti M, Bosi G (2013) Archaeobotany in urban site: the case of Mutina. Ann Bot 3:217–230
Rottoli M, Castiglioni E (2009) Prehistory of plant growing and collecting in northern Italy, based on seed remains from the early Neolithic to the Chalcolithic (c. 5600–2100 cal bc). Veget Hist Archaeobot 18:91–103
Sabato D, Masi A, Ucchesu M et al (2015) Archaeobotanical analysis of a Bronze Age well from Sardinia: a wealth of knowledge. Plant Biosyst 1:205–215
Sampels S (2013) Oxidation and antioxidants in fish and meat from farm to fork. In: Muzzalupo I (ed) Food industry. InTech Publishing, Croatia, pp 114–144
Schlumbaum A, Vandorpe P (2012) A short history of Lagenaria siceraria (bottle gourd) in the Roman provinces: morphotypes and archaeogenetics. Veget Hist Archaeobot 21:499–509
Schultze-Motel J (1974) Literatur über archäologische Kulturpflanzenreste (1972/1973). Kulturpflanze 22:61–76
Twede D (2002) Commercial amphorae: The earliest consumer packages? J Macromark 22:98–108
Ucchesu M, Manunza MR, Sabato D (2017a) Agriculture and exploitation of wild plants at Chalcolithic (4th to 3rd millennium cal bc) sites in Sardinia (Italy). Archaeol Anthropol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-017-0493-6
Ucchesu M, Orrù M, Grillo O, Venora G, Usai A, Serreli PF, Bacchetta G (2015b) Earliest evidence of a primitive cultivar of Vitis vinifera L. during the Bronze Age in Sardinia (Italy). Veget Hist Archaeobot 24:587–600
Ucchesu M, Peña-Chocarro L, Sabato D, Tanda G (2015a) Bronze Age subsistence in Sardinia (Italy): cultivated plants and wild resources. Veget Hist Archaeobot 24:343–355
Ucchesu M, Sarigu M, Del Vais C, Sanna I, D’Hallewin G, Grillo O, Bacchetta G (2017b) First finds of Prunus domestica L. in Italy from the Phoenician and Punic periods (6th–2nd centuries bc). Veget Hist Archaeobot 26:539–549
Van der Veen M (ed) (2011) Consumption, trade and innovation: Exploring the botanical remains from the Roman and Islamic ports at Quseir al-Qadim, Egypt. (Journal of African Archaeology Monograph Series 6). Africa Magna Verlag, Frankfurt
Van Wijk RJ, Van Goor EMJ, Verkley JAC (1988) Ecological studies on Potamogeton pectinatus L. II. Autecological characteristics, with emphasis on salt tolerance, intraspecific variation and isoenzyme patterns. Aquat Bot 32:239–260
Van Zeist W (1983) Fruits in foundation deposits of two temples. J Archaeol Sci 10:351–354
Van Zeist W, Bottema S, Van der Veen M (2001) Diet and vegetation at ancient Carthage: the archaeobotanical evidence. Groningen Institute of Archaeology, Groningen
Wasylikowa K, Van der Veen M (2004) An archaeobotanical contribution to the history of watermelon, Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai (syn. C. vulgaris Schrad.). Veget Hist Archaeobot 13:213–217
Wetterstrom W (1986) Appendix VII. A pilot paleoethnobotanical study at Ortu Comidu. In: Balmuth M et al (eds) Sardara (Cagliari). Preliminary report of excavations 1975–1978 of the Nuraghe Ortu Comidu. Notizie degli Scavi 8:406–409
Wetterstrom W (1987) A preliminary report on the plant remains from Nuraghe Toscono. In: Michels JW, Webster GS (eds) Studies in Nuragic archaeology, village excavations at Nuraghe Urpes and Nuraghe Toscono in west-central Sardinia. (BAR International Series 373) BAR Publishing, Oxford, pp 93–103
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Soprintendenza Archeologia belle arti e paesaggio per la città metropolitana di Cagliari e per le province di Oristano e Sud Sardegna, in particular Marco Edoardo Minoja. Many thanks to James Greig, for improving the English and the anonymous reviewers for theirs critical review of the manuscript. This work was funded by a doctoral grant to Diego Sabato from the Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (MIUR) della Repubblica Italiana.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by C. C. Bakels.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sabato, D., Peña-Chocarro, L., Ucchesu, M. et al. New insights about economic plants during the 6th–2nd centuries bc in Sardinia, Italy. Veget Hist Archaeobot 28, 9–16 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-018-0680-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-018-0680-0