Introduction

In recent decades, considerable progress has been made in imaging science, and this has led to substantial improvements in the field of medical and dental care. In this context, radiography plays an important role in diagnosis in medical and dental practice. However, it is well known that X-rays can induce cytotoxic effects and DNA damage [1]. Considering the strong evidence for a relationship between genetic damage and carcinogenesis [2], the elucidation of the genotoxic effects induced by X-rays is relevant to the identification of the degree of cancer risk and to the minimization of the potential risks to patients and clinicians.

Relevant genetic parameters for human biomonitoring studies include whether the exposure results in the induction of DNA damage, accumulation of damage with repeated exposure, and persistence of damage after exposure to elucidate the kinetics of the recovery process, which includes DNA repair and tissue regeneration [3]. Cytogenetic methods have been used longest and most extensively for the biological monitoring of populations exposed to known mutagens and carcinogens [4]. A great deal of enthusiasm was raised by the application for this purpose of the micronucleus test to uncultured exfoliated cells [5]. A micronucleus arises from acentric fragments or whole chromosomes that are not included in the main nuclei of the daughter cells. Therefore, the formation of micronuclei can be induced by substances that cause chromosome breakage (clastogens) as well as by agents that affect the spindle apparatus (aneugens) [6]. Recently, by means of the micronucleus assay we have encountered cytogenetic damage in buccal mucosa cells of patients with head-and-neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy [7]. In order to contribute to a better understanding of the effects of X-rays upon the cellular system in developing children, in the present study we investigated the frequencies of micronucleated cells in the oral mucosa cells of children who had undergone panoramic dental radiography. To monitor the cytotoxic effects, pyknosis, karyolysis and karyorrhexis were also evaluated in this setting.

Material and methods

Subjects

The subjects of this study comprised 17 healthy children (8 boys and 9 girls) with a mean age of 7.70 ± 1.50 years who had undergone panoramic dental radiography as outpatients at the Department of Pediatrics, São Paulo Metodista University, UMESP, SP, Brazil. Information gathered on the subjects included gender, age, and exposure to genotoxic agents. All panoramic dental radiography examinations were requested by the dentist and were performed using Siemens Orthophos equipment (Erlangen, Germany) with the following settings: 250–71 kV, 15 mA 14 s, 110 mGycm2. The entrance dose was 0.08 R. The study was approved by the Human Ethics Committee of UMESP. Informed consent was obtained from the individuals included in the study or from their parents.

Micronucleus test in oral mucosa cells

Exfoliated oral mucosa cells were collected immediately before the X-ray exposure and after 10 days. After the children had rinsed their mouths with tap water, cells were obtained by scraping the right/left cheek mucosa with a moist wooden spatula. Cells were transferred to a tube containing saline solution, centrifuged (800 rpm) for 5 min, fixed in 3:1 methanol/acetic acid, and dropped onto precleaned slides. Later, the air-dried slides were stained using the Feulgen/Fast-Green method and examined under a light microscope at ×400 magnification to determine the frequency of micronucleated cells. For each sampling time (before and after X-ray exposure), 2,000 cells were scored from each patient.

Data analysis

Micronuclei were scored according to the criteria described by Sarto et al. [8] as a measure of DNA damage (mutagenicity). For cytotoxicity, the following nuclear alterations were considered as described elsewhere [9]: pyknosis, karyolysis and karyorrhexis. The results are expressed as percentages.

Statistical methods

The Wilcoxon rank sum test for dependent samples was used to compare the frequencies of micronuclei and other cellular alterations among the samples before and after X-ray exposure. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Table 1 shows the frequency of micronucleated cells in children undergoing panoramic dental radiography. Before X-ray exposure, the mean frequency of micronucleated cells was 0.04%. No statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) were noted after X-ray exposure. On the other hand, we observed an increase in other nuclear alterations after dental radiography, specifically karyorrhexis, pyknosis and karyolysis (Fig. 1). These data are summarized in Table 1. None of the children evaluated was exposed to other known genotoxic agents.

Table 1 Frequency of micronucleated cells and other nuclear alterations (karyorrhexis, pyknosis and karyolysis) in children undergoing dental radiography
Fig. 1
figure 1

Nuclear alterations after dental radiography: a pyknosis, b karyolysis, c karyorrhexis (arrow) (Feulgen staining, ×100)

Discussion

Industrialization and urbanization has led to the production of genotoxic chemicals that frequently endanger children’s health. This is because children, who are still developing, express increased susceptibility to environmental hazards because of differences in the uptake, metabolism, distribution and excretion of DNA-damaging agents [10]. For example, some studies have shown an increased risk of tumors in children as a result of exposure to genotoxic carcinogens such as pesticides [11, 12]. It is possible that the occurrence of tumors is associated with a reduced ability to metabolize the pesticides. Furthermore, a higher capacity for DNA damage and a decreased capacity for DNA repair have been found in children suffering from malnutrition, a common problem in developing countries [13]. Because micronuclei are assumed to be expressed in dividing cells that contain chromosome fragments and/or whole chromosomes that are unable to migrate to the spindle poles during mitosis, we considered the micronucleus test appropriate for assessing chromosome damage in children following exposure to X-rays. The micronucleus assay of exfoliated buccal mucosa cells has been systematically used in genetic biomonitoring of populations exposed to genotoxic chemicals such as tobacco products and alcohol [14, 15]. The usefulness of the micronucleus assay for biomonitoring of children has also been confirmed by a growing number of studies [16]. The key advantage of the micronucleus assay is the relative ease of scoring, the limited cost and person-time required, and the precision obtained from scoring larger numbers of cells. However, the approach has not been addressed in the literature because the most common reason for studying micronuclei in children is exposure to ionizing radiation as a consequence of accidents [17, 18].

Damage that leads to the formation of micronuclei takes place in the basal layer of the epithelial tissue, where cells undergo mitosis. Rapid turnover of epithelial tissues brings the cells to the surface where they exfoliate. As a result, the maximal rate of micronuclei formation in exfoliated cells is seen 1–3 weeks after exposure to the genotoxic agent [19, 20]. For this reason, we studied cells 10 days after X-ray exposure.

Micronucleated cell indexes might reflect genomic instability [21, 22]. The detection of an elevated frequency of micronuclei in a given population indicates an increased risk of cancer [23]. We found that the micronucleus frequencies were not significantly different before and after X-ray exposure. Such findings are in line with those of many other studies [24]. There have been some reports of higher rates of cytogenetic damage induced by X-rays [25]. Biomonitoring studies of populations exposed to X-rays are quite difficult and rather specific because each population is exposed to different doses of radiation. This could explain why some studies have shown an increase in genetic damage in populations exposed to X-rays. Taken together, we assumed a lack of clastogenic and/or aneugenic effects related to panoramic dental radiography in children.

To monitor cytotoxic effects, the frequencies of karyorrhexis, karyolysis and pyknosis were evaluated in this experimental design. Despite the lack of cytogenetic damage, our results demonstrated that panoramic dental radiography induced cellular death as indicated by statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) between values before and after X-ray exposure. Similar results have been reported by others [24, 26]. Taken as a whole, such results support the idea that X-rays are a cytotoxic agent. It is important to stress that cytotoxicity interferes with micronucleus induction because some micronucleated cells are inevitably lost after a cytotoxic insult, confirming the lack of a mutagenic effect of X-rays. Nevertheless, it has been postulated that repeated exposure to cytotoxic agents can result in chronic cell injury, compensatory cell proliferation, hyperplasia and ultimately tumor development [27]. In fact, a correlation between cell proliferation and induction of cancer can be assumed [28]. Proliferation likely increases the risk of mutations within target cells and is important in selective clonal expansion of (exogenously or endogenously) initiated cells from preneoplastic foci and eventually tumors [27].

In human cytogenetic studies, some confounding factors must be considered. Viruses, alterations in the immune system, failures in the DNA repair system, and interindividual variations have been associated with increased frequencies of chromosome aberrations [29]. Furthermore, an age-related increase in micronuclei has been postulated [16]. Because of heterogeneity in the casuistics, it was not possible to correlate the frequency of micronucleated cells with the age in this setting. The influence of tobacco smoke and alcohol are usually considered relevant confounding factors [14]. Obviously, biomonitoring studies in children are less affected by confounders such as cigarette smoke and drinking habits, occupational exposure and diet, which are of great concern in adults.

Conclusion

The results of the present study suggest that X-rays can induce cytotoxic effects in oral mucosa cells. Thus, we cannot assert that X-rays did not induce any such effects in the specific group of children included in this study. In this regard, panoramic dental radiography should be used only when necessary because it can induce cellular death. This study also confirms the usefulness of the micronucleus assay in biomonitoring studies conducted in children, emphasizing their great sensitivity even to exposure to low doses of environmental agents. Further studies in children would be beneficial.