Abstract
Here, we report a fluorescent probe based on a macrocyclic peptide scaffold that specifically stains EpCAM-expressing MCF7 cells. The 14-mer macrocyclic peptide binding to the extracellular domain of EpCAM with a dissociation constant in the low nM range (1.7 nM) was discovered using the random non-standard peptide-integrated discovery system. Notably, this probe containing a fluorescence tag is less than 3000 Da in total and able to visualize nearly every live cell under high cell-density conditions, which was not achieved by the conventional mAb staining method. This suggests that the molecular probe based on the compact macrocyclic scaffold has great potentials as an imaging tool for the EpCAM biomarker as well as a delivery vehicle for drug conjugates.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Epithelial cell adhesion molecule, so-called EpCAM, is a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed exclusively in epithelia and epithelial-derived neoplasms (Armstrong and Eck 2003). Extensive studies on EpCAM have led to the knowledge of its roles in not only the original function of cell adhesion (Ladwein et al. 2005; Litvinov et al. 1997; Nochi et al. 2004; Trzpis et al. 2007) but also signaling (Guillemot et al. 2001; Maetzel et al. 2009; Munz et al. 2004), cell migration (Guillemot et al. 2001; Osta et al. 2004), proliferation (Munz et al. 2004; Osta et al. 2004), and differentiation (Cirulli et al. 1998; Osta et al. 2004). Most importantly, immunohistochemical studies revealed that EpCAM is overexpressed on various carcinoma cells isolated from patients with breast, prostate, ovarian, lung, colon, renal, and gastric cancer (Baeuerle and Gires 2007; Patriarca et al. 2012; Spizzo et al. 2004, 2006; Went et al. 2005, 2006), implying the importance of EpCAM as a diagnostic biomarker for various cancers. Moreover, EpCAM is recently recognized as a critical biomarker of cancer stem cells, which makes it more exciting to develop specific probes for not only in vitro/vivo imaging but also in drug-conjugate carriers.
Specific probes to cancer biomarkers are often made of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (Chaudry et al. 2007; Deonarain et al. 2009; Kwiatkowska-Borowczyk et al. 2015; Linke et al. 2010). Specific mAbs against EpCAM have been generated and even commercially available from various venders for laboratory use. To make fluorescently active probes, the mAb can be directly tagged with a fluorescent molecule, such as fluorescein or rhodamine, often involving random modification(s) to the exterior lysine residues available on the mAb by the chemistry of amide bond formation. Alternatively, partial or full reduction of disulfide bond(s) liberates thiol groups, which can be covalently modified with the thiol-selective fluorescent molecules using maleimide chemistry, for instance (Kratz et al. 2012; Shaunak et al. 2006). Despite the high specificity and affinity of mAb to EpCAM in the complex of 1:1 or 1:2 stoichiometry, a drawback of the above method is that neither of these methods produces a homogeneously modified probe. Instead, a secondary mAb conjugated with a fluorescent molecule is often used for non-labeled anti-EpCAM mAbs. Because of convenience of this method due to a single kind of the secondary mAbs against a constant region of mAbs is applicable to a variety of different mAbs against antigens of interest, this method is more generally utilized particularly in vitro experiments. However, for the application of human in vivo imaging or drug-conjugate, the former method involving a humanized mAb directly modified with such molecules is the only choice.
More recently, probes based on non-full-length antibodies or alternative molecules have been developed. Single chain antibody fragment (scFv) often generated by phage-display is a typical example of the former alternative (Hristodorov et al. 2014; Huls et al. 1999; Hussain et al. 2006). Other protein scaffolds such as designed ankyrin repeat proteins (DARPins) (Martin-Killias et al. 2011; Stefan et al. 2011) or antigen-specific shark vNAR domains (Zielonka et al. 2014) have been also used to generate EpCAM-specific and high affinity molecules. More distinct alternatives are nucleotide aptamers, which have been successfully generated by the in vitro selection (or SELEX) method (Jung et al. 2014; Song et al. 2013; Subramanian et al. 2014). All these molecules can be conjugated with an appropriate fluorescent tag for the use of tumor imaging. Although these alternatives have smaller molecular sizes than mAb, they are yet in a size of over 10,000 Da. Thus, it still remains a challenge to obtain specific probes for EpCAM with less than 10,000 Da, which gives us better synthetic accessibility as well as chemical amenability.
Here, we report that macrocyclic peptides strongly bind to the extracellular domain of EpCAM (ex-EpCAM) with a dissociation constant in the low nM range (1.7 nM), and a fluorescently labeled probe derived from one of the macrocyclic peptides is able to specifically stain MCF7 cells expressing EpCAM. This 14-mer thioether-linked macrocyclic peptide containing a single d-tryptophan was discovered by means of the random non-standard peptide-integrated discovery (RaPID) system (Morioka et al. 2015; Passioura et al. 2014; Yamagishi et al. 2011). The probe derived from this peptide consists of a triple-repeat of glycine-serine linker followed by a lysine residue of which ε-amino group in the sidechain was tagged with fluorescein, of which the molecular mass was less than 3000 Da. Notably, this small probe was able to visualize nearly every live cell under high cell-density conditions, which was not achieved by the conventional mAb staining method. This suggests that the molecular probe based on the compact macrocyclic peptide scaffold has great potentials as an imaging tool for the EpCAM biomarker as well as a delivery vehicle for drug conjugates.
Results and Discussion
The RaPID Selection of Anti-EpCAM Macrocyclic Peptides
To discover macrocyclic peptide ligands against ex-EpCAM, we have utilized the RaPID system (Morioka et al. 2015; Passioura et al. 2014) that enables us to ribosomally express a macrocyclic peptide library from the corresponding mRNA library under the reprogrammed genetic code; and then the individual peptides are fused to the cognate mRNA via a puromycin (Pu) linker (Nemoto et al. 1997; Roberts and Szostak 1997) which is ligated to the 3′-end of mRNA by the catalysis of ribosome (Fig. 1). Since the details of the technology have been discussed elsewhere (Hayashi et al. 2012; Ito et al. 2015; Kodan et al. 2014; Morimoto et al. 2012; Tanaka et al. 2013; Yamagishi et al. 2011), we here focused on describing the design of the library used in this study. The initiator codon (AUG) was reprogrammed to encode N-ClAc-d-tryptophan (ClAc-DW), where ClAc-DW-\({\text{tRNA}}^{\text{fMet}}_{\text{CAU}}\) prepared by a flexizyme (eFx) was added to the Met/RF1-deficient translation (FIT, flexible in vitro translation) system (Goto et al. 2011). Following the initiator ClAc-DW, elongator amino acid sequences were encoded by (NNK) n (K = U or G, n = 4–12) on the mRNA library. Subsequently, a cysteine residue was encoded by UGC, (GS)3 linker encoded by (GGCAGC)3, followed by a terminator encoded by UAG that would not result in release of the peptide chain due to the lack of RF1; instead, the Pu linker, which was annealed and ligated to the constant region of the 3′-end region of the individual mRNAs, would be efficiently fused with the C-terminus of the (GS)3 linker via an amide bond. The thiol sidechain in a Cys residue encoded by UGU appeared in the random region (except for the 2nd position, see Iwasaki et al. 2012) or the designated downstream linker region would selectively react with the N-terminal ClAc group (Goto et al. 2008; Iwasaki et al. 2012). This intramolecular SN2 substitution displayed the thioether-macrocyclic peptides on the cognate mRNAs, which would allow us to perform in vitro selection of active species for binding to the ex-EpCAM immobilized on magnetic beads.
We thus performed selection against the ex-EpCAM according to the standard procedure (Hayashi et al. 2012; Yamagishi et al. 2011). At the 4th round of selection, the recovery of binding species significantly increased over the background (i.e., species binding to magnetic beads), and we have decided to clone the enriched peptide species after 5 rounds of selection and carry out sequencing of 19 clones (Fig. 2a). Sequence alignment of the 19 peptides revealed three classes of macrocyclic peptides, Class I–III (Supplementary Fig. 1). Among them, Class I peptide (Epi-1) with a 14-mer macrocyclic structure was the most abundant single species (5/19), where the Cys residue used for thioether macrocyclization came from the designated UGC Cys codon. The third abundant single species (3/19), Class II peptide (Epi-2), has a small macrocycle with a linear tail peptide. It should be noted that both Class I and II peptides were expressed “in-frame” from the respective mRNA templates, which were apparent from the triplet repeat of the GS linker (Supplementary Fig. 1).
In the Class IIIa–c peptides (Epi-3–9), the Cys residue that formed thioether bond to the N-terminus was flanked by two consensus regions (Supplementary Fig. 1). The Class IIIa peptides, including the second abundant single species of Epi-3, have a consensus sequence of LGLI, while the Class IIIb and IIIc peptides have a single mutation from G to H and L to H, respectively. The C-terminal sequence appeared following the Cys residue contained seven consecutive alanine residues followed by RTGGG, which are fully conserved in the Class IIIa–c peptides. This conserved sequence was originated from a “frame-shift” occurred in the random sequence region likely caused by deletion of a base in the mRNA library, i.e., one-nucleotide deletion in the random region resulted in the frame-shift of the originally designed UGC-(GGC-AGC)3 region encoding a single Cys residue and (GS)3 linker to GCG-(GCA-GCG)3 yielding seven consecutive alanine residues.
Characterization of the Macrocyclic Peptides in the Display Format
To verify the binding activities of the selected peptides, Epi-1 and Epi-3 were chosen for further studies (Fig. 2b). We first performed binding assay using the display format, where the recovery of Epi-1-mRNA or Epi-3-mRNA to the ex-EpCAM-immobilized beads versus the free beads was determined by real-time PCR (Fig. 2c). Moreover, to verify importance of the macrocyclic scaffold, we prepared their liner versions, LinEpi-1-mRNA and LinEpi-3-mRNA (Fig. 2b), to monitor the recovery rates (Fig. 2c). The data showed that both Epi-1-mRNA and Epi-3-mRNA had three orders of magnitude higher recovery rates over the background, indicating that these macrocyclic peptides bound ex-EpCAM. Linearization in both peptides resulted in complete loss of their binding ability, indicating that the macrocyclic scaffold is critical in both peptides.
Since Epi-3 has a tail peptide of hepta-alanine followed by RTGGG, we wondered how important these residues are for the binding. We thus prepared four constructs of deletion mutants of Epi-3 (Supplementary Fig. 2), in which the tail peptide was completely replaced with a (GS)3-linker peptide (Epi-3-GS), partly with the GS-linker peptide (Epi-3-A1 and A3), and with hexa-alanine only as the tail peptide (Epi-3-A6). To our surprise, only Epi-3-A6 was able to bind to ex-EpCAM with a slight loss of wildtype activity, suggesting that the poly-A tail peptide plays some roles in the binding.
Synthesis of a Fluorescent Probe for Cellular EpCAM
Prior to the synthesis of a fluorescent probe based on the macrocyclic peptides, we chemically synthesized the Epi-1 and Epi-3 with C-terminal carboxyamide and determined their kinetic constants to ex-EpCAM on an SPR sensor chip (Supplementary Fig. 3). The association rate constant (k a) and the dissociation rate constant (k d) of Epi-1 were 5.1 × 106 M−1 s−1 and 8.5 × 10−3 s−1, respectively. These values have led to the dissociation constant (K D) of 1.7 nM (Table 1). Similar values were also observed for Epi-3 (Table 1). These results indicated that both macrocyclic peptides have remarkable binding ability to ex-EpCAM, as expected from the qualitative results using the display format. However, we concerned that the hydrophobicity of the hepta-alanine tail peptide might cause non-specific interactions with other transmembrane proteins on cells. Therefore, we decided to focus on the Epi-1 macrocyclic peptide for the development of fluorescent probe for cellular EpCAM.
We designed two fluorescent probes based on the Epi-1 peptide sequence. One probe was the macrocyclic Epi-1, and its C-terminus was modified with a lysine-carboxyamide residue where the ε-amino group on the sidechain was tagged with fluorescein (Epi-1-F, Fig. 3a). The other probe was the liner Epi-1 with the same fluorescein modification (LinEpi-1-F, Fig. 3a). These molecules were readily synthesized and purified by means of the standard solid-phase chemical synthesis and preparative HPLC.
Fluorescent Imaging of EpCAM-Expressing Cells Using the Macrocyclic Peptide Probes
We first tested Epi-1-F to fluorescently stain EpCAM-expressing MCF7, breast cancer cells. Incubation of Epi-1-F with MCF7 cells for 5 min, followed by gentle wash with media, allowed us to clearly visualize the membrane region of individual live cells using a fluorescent confocal microscope (Fig. 3b). Simultaneously, the cells were also stained by a conventional immunostaining method using anti-EpCAM antibody, giving nearly the same staining pattern as the Epi-1-F staining. In contrast, LinEpi-1-F, which should lack of binding ability to EpCAM based on our previous study (Fig. 2c), was unable to fluorescently stain MCF7 cells at all, whereas the antibody control could do (Fig. 3c). This indicates that the binding ability of Epi-1 to EpCAM is critical for the staining of cells. As an additional negative control, we examined staining of the EpCAM-deficient cells, HuO-3N1, using Epi-1-F. Neither Epi-1-F nor antibody was able to stain HuO-3N1 cells, as expected, clearly showing the high specificity of Epi-1-F as an EpCAM probe.
During the course of the above study, we noticed that a certain area of cells could be stained only by Epi-1-F, not antibody (see the bottom part of the merged image of Fig. 3b). It turned out that this area of cells was denser than other areas of cells. We therefore wondered if Epi-1-F could fully stain MCF7 cells under high cell-density conditions. In fact, Epi-1-F was able to stain nearly every live cell not only the surface area of dense cells (Fig. 4a) but also the middle area of cell–cell interfaces (Fig. 4b). In contrast, the antibody could stain the surface area better than the middle area.
Although the above qualitative analysis under the conditions where MCF7 cells are adherent on the plate has indicated that Epi-1-F effectively binds EpCAM on the cells, we have also preformed quantitative analysis of the peptide staining for suspended (floating) MCF7 cells by means of flow cytometry. The EpCAM-positive MCF7 cells and EpCAM-negative HLF cells were treated with trypsin independently, and then the respective cells were resuspended in Hank’s balanced salt (HBS) solution. These cells were then stained with both Epi-1-F and an allophycocyanin (APC, which has a 670 nm fluorescent emission profile, distinct from that of fluorescein at 520 nm) conjugated anti-EpCAM monoclonal antibody simultaneously and subjected to flow cytometry (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b). Epi-1-F effectively stained 81.7 % of MCF7 cells whereas it stained only 1.1 % of HLF cells. The antibody was able to stain 99.3 % of MCF7 cells compared with a negligible population of HLF cells. The results clearly indicate that despite its small size compared with the antibody, Epi-1-F can effectively distinguish the EpCAM-positive cells over the negative cells.
Conclusion
Here, we have reported the RaPID selection of thioether macrocyclic peptides that strongly bind to ex-EpCAM. The most abundant macrocyclic peptide among the clones identified in this study, referred to as Epi-1, exhibits remarkably high affinity to the EpCAM with K D of a single-digit nM. The fluorescent probe derived from Epi-1 with 2904 Da is able to specifically stain EpCAM-expressing cells. Even though Epi-1 was selected against the extracellular domain of EpCAM in vitro, it is capable of binding to the full-length cellular EpCAM in the highly specific manner, allowing us to utilize it as an excellent fluorescent imaging probe. Particularly, our study on the Epi-1-F staining of MCF7 under high cell-density conditions showed its greater advantage of effective staining of every cell interfaces than the conventional antibody staining. This result encourages us to develop not only an imaging probe for EpCAM-expressing cancer stem cells but also a drug-delivery vehicle with the format of a peptide-drug conjugate. Moreover, the RaPID system would enable us to discover potent macrocyclic peptide ligands against a wide array of tumor-associated transmembrane proteins, which opens a new opportunity for the next generation of small non-protein drugs.
References
Armstrong A, Eck SL (2003) EpCAM: a new therapeutic target for an old cancer antigen. Cancer Biol Ther 2:320–326
Baeuerle PA, Gires O (2007) EpCAM (CD326) finding its role in cancer. Br J Cancer 96:417–423. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603494
Chaudry MA, Sales K, Ruf P, Lindhofer H, Winslet MC (2007) EpCAM an immunotherapeutic target for gastrointestinal malignancy: current experience and future challenges. Br J Cancer 96:1013–1019. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603505
Cirulli V et al (1998) KSA antigen Ep-CAM mediates cell-cell adhesion of pancreatic epithelial cells: morphoregulatory roles in pancreatic islet development. J Cell Biol 140:1519–1534
Deonarain MP, Kousparou CA, Epenetos AA (2009) Antibodies targeting cancer stem cells: a new paradigm in immunotherapy? MAbs 1:12–25
Goto Y, Ohta A, Sako Y, Yamagishi Y, Murakami H, Suga H (2008) Reprogramming the translation initiation for the synthesis of physiologically stable cyclic peptides. ACS Chem Biol 3:120–129. doi:10.1021/cb700233t
Goto Y, Katoh T, Suga H (2011) Flexizymes for genetic code reprogramming. Nat Protoc 6:779–790. doi:10.1038/nprot.2011.331
Guillemot JC, Naspetti M, Malergue F, Montcourrier P, Galland F, Naquet P (2001) Ep-CAM transfection in thymic epithelial cell lines triggers the formation of dynamic actin-rich protrusions involved in the organization of epithelial cell layers. Histochem Cell Biol 116:371–378. doi:10.1007/s004180100329
Hayashi Y, Morimoto J, Suga H (2012) In vitro selection of anti-Akt2 thioether-macrocyclic peptides leading to isoform-selective inhibitors. ACS Chem Biol 7:607–613. doi:10.1021/cb200388k
Hristodorov D et al (2014) EpCAM-selective elimination of carcinoma cells by a novel MAP-based cytolytic fusion protein. Mol Cancer Ther 13:2194–2202. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0781
Huls GA et al (1999) A recombinant, fully human monoclonal antibody with antitumor activity constructed from phage-displayed antibody fragments. Nat Biotechnol 17:276–281. doi:10.1038/7023
Hussain S, Pluckthun A, Allen TM, Zangemeister-Wittke U (2006) Chemosensitization of carcinoma cells using epithelial cell adhesion molecule-targeted liposomal antisense against bcl-2/bcl-xL. Mol Cancer Ther 5:3170–3180. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0412
Ito K et al (2015) Artificial human Met agonists based on macrocycle scaffolds. Nat Commun 6:6373. doi:10.1038/ncomms7373
Iwasaki K, Goto Y, Katoh T, Suga H (2012) Selective thioether macrocyclization of peptides having the N-terminal 2-chloroacetyl group and competing two or three cysteine residues in translation. Org Biomol Chem 10:5783–5786. doi:10.1039/c2ob25306b
Jung YK, Woo MA, Soh HT, Park HG (2014) Aptamer-based cell imaging reagents capable of fluorescence switching. Chem Commun (Camb) 50:12329–12332. doi:10.1039/c4cc03888f
Kodan A et al (2014) Structural basis for gating mechanisms of a eukaryotic P-glycoprotein homolog. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:4049–4054. doi:10.1073/pnas.1321562111
Kratz H, Haeckel A, Michel R, Schonzart L, Hanisch U, Hamm B, Schellenberger E (2012) Straightforward thiol-mediated protein labelling with DTPA: Synthesis of a highly active 111In-annexin A5-DTPA tracer. EJNMMI Res 2:17. doi:10.1186/2191-219X-2-17
Kwiatkowska-Borowczyk EP, Gabka-Buszek A, Jankowski J, Mackiewicz A (2015) Immunotargeting of cancer stem cells. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 19:A52–A59. doi:10.5114/wo.2014.47129
Ladwein M et al (2005) The cell-cell adhesion molecule EpCAM interacts directly with the tight junction protein claudin-7. Exp Cell Res 309:345–357. doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.06.013
Linke R, Klein A, Seimetz D (2010) Catumaxomab: clinical development and future directions. MAbs 2:129–136
Litvinov SV et al (1997) Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (Ep-CAM) modulates cell-cell interactions mediated by classic cadherins. J Cell Biol 139:1337–1348
Maetzel D et al (2009) Nuclear signalling by tumour-associated antigen EpCAM. Nat Cell Biol 11:162–171. doi:10.1038/ncb1824
Martin-Killias P, Stefan N, Rothschild S, Pluckthun A, Zangemeister-Wittke U (2011) A novel fusion toxin derived from an EpCAM-specific designed ankyrin repeat protein has potent antitumor activity. Clin Cancer Res 17:100–110. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1303
Morimoto J, Hayashi Y, Suga H (2012) Discovery of macrocyclic peptides armed with a mechanism-based warhead: isoform-selective inhibition of human deacetylase SIRT2. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 51:3423–3427. doi:10.1002/anie.201108118
Morioka T, Loik ND, Hipolito CJ, Goto Y, Suga H (2015) Selection-based discovery of macrocyclic peptides for the next generation therapeutics. Curr Opin Chem Biol 26:34–41. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.01.023
Munz M, Kieu C, Mack B, Schmitt B, Zeidler R, Gires O (2004) The carcinoma-associated antigen EpCAM upregulates c-myc and induces cell proliferation. Oncogene 23:5748–5758. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207610
Nemoto N, Miyamoto-Sato E, Husimi Y, Yanagawa H (1997) In vitro virus: bonding of mRNA bearing puromycin at the 3′-terminal end to the C-terminal end of its encoded protein on the ribosome in vitro. FEBS Lett 414:405–408
Nochi T et al (2004) Biological role of Ep-CAM in the physical interaction between epithelial cells and lymphocytes in intestinal epithelium. Clin Immunol 113:326–339. doi:10.1016/j.clim.2004.08.013
Osta WA et al (2004) EpCAM is overexpressed in breast cancer and is a potential target for breast cancer gene therapy. Cancer Res 64:5818–5824. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0754
Passioura T, Katoh T, Goto Y, Suga H (2014) Selection-based discovery of druglike macrocyclic peptides. Annu Rev Biochem 83:727–752. doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060713-035456
Patriarca C, Macchi RM, Marschner AK, Mellstedt H (2012) Epithelial cell adhesion molecule expression (CD326) in cancer: a short review. Cancer Treat Rev 38:68–75. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.04.002
Roberts RW, Szostak JW (1997) RNA-peptide fusions for the in vitro selection of peptides and proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:12297–12302
Shaunak S et al (2006) Site-specific PEGylation of native disulfide bonds in therapeutic proteins. Nat Chem Biol 2:312–313. doi:10.1038/nchembio786
Song Y et al (2013) Selection of DNA aptamers against epithelial cell adhesion molecule for cancer cell imaging and circulating tumor cell capture. Anal Chem 85:4141–4149. doi:10.1021/ac400366b
Spizzo G et al (2004) High Ep-CAM expression is associated with poor prognosis in node-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 86:207–213. doi:10.1023/B:BREA.0000036787.59816.01
Spizzo G et al (2006) Overexpression of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (Ep-CAM) is an independent prognostic marker for reduced survival of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 103:483–488. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.03.035
Stefan N, Martin-Killias P, Wyss-Stoeckle S, Honegger A, Zangemeister-Wittke U, Pluckthun A (2011) DARPins recognizing the tumor-associated antigen EpCAM selected by phage and ribosome display and engineered for multivalency. J Mol Biol 413:826–843. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2011.09.016
Subramanian N, Sreemanthula JB, Balaji B, Kanwar JR, Biswas J, Krishnakumar S (2014) A strain-promoted alkyne-azide cycloaddition (SPAAC) reaction of a novel EpCAM aptamer-fluorescent conjugate for imaging of cancer cells. Chem Commun (Camb) 50:11810–11813. doi:10.1039/c4cc02996h
Tanaka Y et al (2013) Structural basis for the drug extrusion mechanism by a MATE multidrug transporter. Nature 496:247–251. doi:10.1038/nature12014
Trzpis M, McLaughlin PM, de Leij LM, Harmsen MC (2007) Epithelial cell adhesion molecule: more than a carcinoma marker and adhesion molecule. Am J Pathol 171:386–395. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2007.070152
Went P, Dirnhofer S, Salvisberg T, Amin MB, Lim SD, Diener PA, Moch H (2005) Expression of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCam) in renal epithelial tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 29:83–88
Went P et al (2006) Frequent high-level expression of the immunotherapeutic target Ep-CAM in colon, stomach, prostate and lung cancers. Br J Cancer 94:128–135. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602924
Yamagishi Y, Shoji I, Miyagawa S, Kawakami T, Katoh T, Goto Y, Suga H (2011) Natural product-like macrocyclic N-methyl-peptide inhibitors against a ubiquitin ligase uncovered from a ribosome-expressed de novo library. Chem Biol 18:1562–1570. doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.09.013
Zielonka S et al (2014) Shark Attack: high affinity binding proteins derived from shark vNAR domains by stepwise in vitro affinity maturation. J Biotechnol 191:236–245. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.04.023
Acknowledgments
We thank Drs. M. Ohuchi and T. Yoshitomi for supporting in the preparation of the manuscript. This work was supported by Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare Grants-in-aid for Scientific Research programs from 2010 to 2012 to H. S., Y. T., and S. K., Grants-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows (7734) to K. I., and partly grants of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grants-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A) (24681047) to T. K., and Challenging Exploratory Research (15K12739) to Y. G.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Iwasaki, K., Goto, Y., Katoh, T. et al. A Fluorescent Imaging Probe Based on a Macrocyclic Scaffold That Binds to Cellular EpCAM. J Mol Evol 81, 210–217 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-015-9710-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-015-9710-z