Abstract
Electrical activity plays an important role in plant life; in particular, electrical responses can participate in the reception of the action of stressors (local electrical responses and oscillations) and signal transduction into unstimulated parts of the plant (action potential, variation potential and system potential). Understanding the mechanisms of electrical responses and subsequent changes in physiological processes and the prediction of plant responses to stressors requires the elaboration of mathematical models of electrical activity in plant organisms. Our review describes approaches to the simulation of plant electrogenesis and summarizes current models of electrical activity in these organisms. It is shown that there are numerous models of the generation of electrical responses, which are based on various descriptions (from modifications of the classical Hodgkin–Huxley model to detailed models, which consider ion transporters, regulatory processes, buffers, etc.). A moderate number of works simulate the propagation of electrical signals using equivalent electrical circuits, systems of excitable elements with local electrical coupling and descriptions of chemical signal propagation. The transmission of signals from a plasma membrane to intracellular compartments (endoplasmic reticulum, vacuole) during the generation of electrical responses is much less modelled. Finally, only a few works simulate plant physiological changes that are connected with electrical responses or investigate the inverse problem: reconstruction of the type and parameters of stimuli through the analysis of electrical responses. In the conclusion of the review, we discuss future perspectives on the simulation of electrical activity in plants.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The perception of information about environmental factors is a necessary mechanism for a plant adaptation. The plasma membrane plays a key role in this perception, and the generation of electrical responses (changes in the gradient of electrical potential on the plasma membrane) is an important part of a plant’s early response to external stimuli. Changes in the activities of ion channels (Trebacz et al. 2006; Fromm and Lautner 2007; Felle and Zimmermann 2007) and systems of active transport (Hills et al. 2012) are the main mechanisms of the generation of electrical response. Initial shifts in the membrane potential (Opritov et al. 1991, 2005), the activation of signalling cascades in the plasma membrane (Nayyar 2003; Gilroy et al. 2016) and/or modification of their properties (fluidity, surface charge, electrostriction) (Hauser et al. 1976; Opritov et al. 1991; Pyatygin et al. 1992; Murata and Los 1997) can participate in the development of these changes due to external stimuli.
Stimulus-induced electrical responses can cause physiological changes in the stimulated zone (Pyatygin 2004) and the propagation of electrical signals (ESs) through the plant body (Sibaoka 1991; Trebacz et al. 2006; Beilby 2007; Fromm and Lautner 2007; Gallé et al. 2015; Vodeneev et al. 2015; Sukhov 2016). The ESs can induce the movement of organs in some plants including the pulvinus in Mimosa pudica, the trap lobes in Dionaea muscipula and Aldrovanda vesiculosa, and the tentacle in Drosera (Sibaoka 1991). In addition, the ESs, which propagate from stimulated zone to unstimulated parts of the plant, induce numerous physiological changes in these parts (Fromm and Lautner 2007; Gallé et al. 2015; Sukhov 2016). The responses include respiratory activation (Filek and Kościelniak 1997; Lautner et al. 2014), shifts in transpiration rate and stomata opening (Fromm and Fei 1998; Grams et al. 2007), changes in photosynthetic activity (Fromm and Fei 1998; Krupenina and Bulychev 2007; Pavlovič et al. 2011; Grams et al. 2009; Sukhov et al. 2012, 2014a, 2015a, 2016; Sherstneva et al. 2015), increased ATP content in leaves (Surova et al. 2016b), modification of the consumption of mineral compounds by roots (Opritov et al. 1991; Shabala and Knowles 2002), suppression of phloem transport (Fromm 1991; Fromm and Bauer 1994; Furch et al. 2010), stimulation of the expression of defence genes (Graham et al. 1986; Fisahn et al. 2004; Mousavi et al. 2013), the production of phytohormones (Dziubinska et al. 2003; Hlavinka et al. 2012), and the cytoplasmic streaming cessation in the characean algae (Williamson and Ashley 1982). It is probable that the result of these physiological changes led to the evolution of plant adaptation to negative environmental conditions (Retivin et al. 1997, 1999; Sukhov et al. 2014b, 2015b; Surova et al. 2016a; Sukhov 2016).
Investigation of the mechanisms of generation of stimulus-induced electrical responses and ES propagation is necessary to understand the mechanisms of physiological changes and adaptation. The simulation of electrophysiological processes in plant cells is a prospective tool for theoretical investigation of the problem (Beilby 1981, 1982, 2007; Beilby and Al Khazaaly 2016; Mummert and Gradmann 1991; Sukhov and Vodeneev 2009; Hills et al. 2012; Sukhov et al. 2013; Chatterjee et al. 2014). There are a number of benefits of simulation: rapid testing of hypotheses about the mechanisms of investigated processes, prediction of the plant response that can be used to improve the design of future experiments, improvement of the interpretation of experimental results, etc. These benefits are especially important for the investigation of complex processes in plant electrophysiology, including multi-cellular interactions among plant cells (e.g. ES propagation, Sukhov et al. 2011a), the cooperative activity of ion-transport systems in the cells (e.g. electrical oscillations, Gradmann 2001a, b), the development of various physiological changes connected to ion transport and electrical activity (e.g. closing/opening of stomata, Chen et al. 2012), and others.
There are two main ways to simulate electrical activity in plants. (i) Elaboration of detailed mathematical models of the reception of stimuli of plant cells (including responses to salinity in salt tolerant and salt sensitive plants, electrical current, and cooling), generation of electrical responses, propagation of ESs and development of physiological changes (Beilby 1981, 1982, 2007; Mummert and Gradmann 1991; Gradmann 2001a, b; Garkusha et al. 2002; Sukhov and Vodeneev 2009; Sukhov et al. 2011a, 2013; Chen et al. 2012; Beilby and Casanova 2014; Minguet-Parramona et al. 2016; Beilby and Al Khazaaly 2016), considering the mechanisms of the investigated processes. This approach is the basis of theoretical testing of different mechanistic hypotheses about the mechanisms of these processes. (ii) The use of regression equations (or neural networks) to describe the connection between stimulation (‘input’) and the plant electrical response (‘output’) (Chatterjee et al. 2014, 2015; Chen et al. 2016). This approach can be used to predict the plant response to external stimuli and to detect stimulus parameters based on the characteristics of electrical response. The aim of our work is to review the modern mathematical models of both groups.
Electrical Responses of Plants and Their Mechanisms
It is well known that the stimulation of plant cells changes the activities of ion transporters in the plasma membrane and induces electrical responses. There are several types of electrical responses in plants, including local electrical responses (LERs) of cells in the zone of stressors action (Krol and Trebacz 1999; Opritov et al. 2005; Vodeneev et al. 2015), action potential (AP) (Trebacz et al. 2006; Fromm and Lautner 2007; Gallé et al. 2015), variation potential (VP) (Stahlberg et al. 2006; Vodeneev et al. 2015), and system potential (SP) (Zimmermann et al. 2009, 2016). In addition, plants have periodic electrical oscillations that can participate in the reception of stimuli (Shabala et al. 2006).
Local electrical responses are generated by plant cells in the zone of stimulation under the action of various factors (cooling, touch, changes in illumination, and others) (Bulychev and Vredenberg 1995; Trebacz and Sievers 1998; Pikulenko and Bulychev 2005; Opritov et al. 2005; Krol et al. 2003, 2006). Their amplitude is somewhat dependent on the intensity and duration of the stimulus. In some cases, LERs can induce propagating ESs, e.g. action potential (Trebacz and Sievers 1998; Pikulenko and Bulychev 2005; Opritov et al. 2005). It is probable that the transient inactivation of H+-ATPase, which is the main active electrogenic transporter of the plasma membrane, is the important mechanism of LER generation (Opritov et al. 2005). It is known that inactivation of this transporter can be induced by low temperature (Pyatygin 2004; Opritov et al. 2005) and changes in light intensities (Bulychev and Vredenberg 1995; Pikulenko and Bulychev 2005). The recovery of H+-ATPase activity causes repolarization of the plasma membrane (Bulychev and Vredenberg 1995). Another important mechanism of LERs is changes in the activities of ion channels, which were observed after stimulation by cold (Krol et al. 2003, 2004), light (Krol and Trebacz 1999) or osmotic stress (Shepherd et al. 2008).
AP is an electrical signal consisting of a short-term spike of electrical potential on the plasma membrane (Fig. 1a). AP operates under an all-or-none law, i.e. subthreshold stimuli do not induce AP, and overthreshold stimuli cause a signal with constant amplitude (Trebacz et al. 2006). The classical scheme of AP generation (Trebacz et al. 1989, 2006; Beilby 2007; Felle and Zimmermann 2007; Fromm and Lautner 2007) in plants (Charophyceae, liverworts, higher plants) is based on the following chain of events: stimuli—initial depolarization—activation of potential-dependent Ca2+ channels in plasma membrane and, possibly, inositol-3-phosphate (IP3)-dependent Ca2+ channels in intracellular compartments (endoplasmic reticulum, vacuole)—increase in concentration of calcium ions in cytoplasm—activation of Cl− channels—depolarization of electrical potential on plasma membrane—activation of outward K+ channels—repolarization. Higher plants have an additional mechanism of AP generation (Vodeneev et al. 2006, 2015; Sukhov 2016), namely a transient inactivation of H+-ATPase caused by the transient increase in calcium concentration. An alternative mechanism of AP generation has been shown in the green algae Acetabularia (Gradmann 1976), which are in a very different branch of plant lineage; the mechanism is connected with a transient inactivation of the chloride electrogenic pump. AP is a self-propagating ES (Trebacz et al. 2006; Beilby 2007; Krol et al. 2010). In lower plants, AP propagates through a homogeneous symplast of cells of the plant body (Trebacz et al. 2006); in higher plants, action potential propagates through a symplast of sieve elements and (or) a symplast of parenchyma cells (Opritov et al. 1991; Fromm and Lautner 2007; Zhao et al. 2015; Vodeneev et al. 2016) in vascular bundles.
VP is a long-term electrical signal induced by various types of damage (burning, heating, mechanical wounding, etc.); it has an irregular shape (Fig. 1b), including long-term depolarization and short-term ‘AP-like’ spikes (Stahlberg et al. 2006; Vodeneev et al. 2015; Sukhov 2016). It is possible that variation potential is a local electric response to the propagation of a non-electrical signal (Vodeneev et al. 2015) because VP amplitude is dependent on the parameters of damage, and the signal propagation is not electrotonic. The probable routes of VP propagation include transmission of a chemical signal (Rhodes et al. 1999; León et al. 2001), a hydraulic wave (Mancuso 1999; Stahlberg et al. 2006) or their combination (Malone 1994; Vodeneev et al. 2015), activating mechanosensitive and/or ligand-dependent Ca2+ channels (Vodeneev et al. 2015; Sukhov 2016). Ca2+ influx induces the inactivation of H+-ATPase and the activation of Cl− channels that cause the depolarization of the plasma membrane (Stahlberg and Cosgrove 1997; Vodeneev et al. 2011, 2015; Katicheva et al. 2014). The inactivation of H+-ATPase is the main mechanism of long-term depolarization (Katicheva et al. 2014; Vodeneev et al. 2015); the inactivation may be caused by a long-term activation of Ca2+ channels (Katicheva et al. 2015). However, a short-term activation of Cl− channels is a possible mechanism of ‘AP-like’ spikes (Katicheva et al. 2014; Vodeneev et al. 2015).
SP is a propagating electrical signal that represents a transitory hyperpolarization (Zimmermann et al. 2009, 2016) (Fig. 1c). System potential is caused by the activation of H+-ATPase (Zimmermann et al. 2009). It is also probable that the signal is connected to K+ channels because preliminary blocking of these channels suppresses the propagation of the hyperpolarization signal (Lautner et al. 2005), and the inactivation of K+ channels induces the activation of H+-ATPase (Sokolik et al. 2001).
Oscillations of membrane potential and ion fluxes can be induced in plants by the action of light (Shabala and Newman 1999), root nutrition (Shabala and Knowles 2002), salt stress (Shabala 2000), the development of turgor pressure in the stomata (Gradmann et al. 1993), changes in the diver depth of algae (Gradmann and Boyd 1995), etc. The mechanism of electrical oscillations is connected to changes in the activities of H+-ATPase, 2H+/Cl− symporter, K+, Cl− and Ca2+ channels as well as interactions of these transporters (Shabala 2000, 2003; Shabala and Knowles 2002; Shabala et al. 2006).
Thus, electrical responses (LERs, ESs, electrical oscillations) have complex mechanisms that require detailed investigations. The simulation of different processes in plant electrogenesis is an important method in these investigations (Gradmann 2001a; Sukhov and Vodeneev 2009; Minguet-Parramona et al. 2016). The elaboration of mathematical models of electrical responses and their analysis can be used to investigate the mechanisms of electrical activity and their physiological effects.
Basic Approaches to Description of Electrical Response Generation in Plants
Describing the dynamics of membrane potential is the first step in the detailed simulation of the generation of electrical responses. In most works (Beilby 1981, 1982; Mummert and Gradmann 1991; Gradmann et al. 1993; Gradmann 2001a, b; Sukhov and Vodeneev 2009; Beilby and Al Khazaaly 2016; Novikova et al. 2017), Eq. (1) from the Hodgkin–Huxley model (Hodgkin and Huxley 1952) was used:
where E m is the membrane potential, C is the specific capacity of the biological membrane, F is the Faraday constant, N is the number of electrogenic transporters that participate in the electrical response, j r is the specific flux from the transporter r, and z r is the charge that the transporter r transfers per catalytic cycle. In some works (Sukhov et al. 2011a, 2013; Sherstneva et al. 2016b), the membrane potential was described based on the stationary solution of Eq. (1) because the generation of electrical responses in higher plants is a relatively slow process in most cases. Simplification accelerates the calculation in the analysis of complex models of electrical activity in plants.
Electrogenic transporters include ion channels, the primary active transport system (mainly, ion-transporting ATPases) and the secondary active transport system (mainly, ion symporters and antiporters). The Goldman–Hodgkin–Katz flux equation is widely used to describe fluxes through ion channels and the secondary active transport system (Gradmann and Hoffstadt 1998a, b; Gradmann 2001a, b; Sukhov and Vodeneev 2009; Sukhov et al. 2011a, 2013; Hills et al. 2012; Beilby and Al Khazaaly 2016; Novikova et al. 2017) because it can describe the dependence of the flux on the membrane potential and ion concentrations. An alternative approach is based on the Hodgkin–Huxley model: electrical currents (fluxes) are described on the basis of modified ohmic equations and are dependent on the membrane potential, ion equilibrium potentials and conductance of transporters (Beilby 1982; Mummert and Gradmann 1991; Gradmann et al. 1993). This approach describes the influence of the membrane potential on ion fluxes, but it does not consider the dependence of transporter conductance on ion concentrations. A parameterization of models of electrogenic transporters is often based on analysis of the current–voltage characteristics (Hills et al. 2012), which can be also used for the investigation of properties of ions transporters under different environmental conditions (Beilby and Casanova 2014; Beilby and Al Khazaaly 2016).
Ion-transporting ATPases can also be described on the basis of a modified ohmic equation (Mummert and Gradmann 1991; Gradmann et al. 1993; Gradmann and Hoffstadt 1998a, b; Gradmann 2001a, b); however, the equation cannot simulate the dependence of flux through the ATPase on ion concentrations. In particular, the effect of flux saturation cannot be described. Kinetic models describing two, four or more states of the enzyme (Hansen et al. 1981, 1983) are another tool for the simulation of ion-transporting ATPases. In ‘two-state’ models (Fig. 2a), ion transport includes two stages, each of which includes the bonding and decay of ions (Sukhov and Vodeneev 2009; Sukhov et al. 2013; Beilby and Al Khazaaly 2016). The first stage is connected to ATP hydrolysis and is not dependent on the membrane potential; the second stage is dependent on the membrane potential. The current–voltage characteristics can be used for the parameterization of the model (Hansen et al. 1981, 1983). Models of ion-transporting ATPases can also include more than two states. ‘Four-state’ models (Fig. 2b) separately describe the ATP-dependent bonding and decay of ions on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane, the bonding and decay on the opposite side, and translocations of the enzyme and the complex of enzyme and ion(s) through the membrane (Hills et al. 2012). The translocations can be potential dependent (charge transfer) or potential independent (transfer of neutral molecule). ‘Multi-state’ models describe ion-transporting ATPases in details (Fisahn et al. 1992); however, they are complicated and have far too many parameters. The equation of Läuger and Stark (1970) or the Goldman–Hodgkin–Katz flux equation (Sukhov and Vodeneev 2009) can be used to describe the dependence of ion transfer on the membrane potential in the different models of ion-transporting ATPases.
Simulation of the non-stationary electrical activity (LERs, ESs, oscillations) requires description of the regulatory mechanisms for ion transporters. This mechanism is a gating in different ion channels that participate in the generation of electrical responses in plants. There are two main approaches to the description of the gating in a plant ion channel. First, the gating can be described by a model of several independent gating particles that activate or inactivate the channel (Hodgkin and Huxley 1952). This model was used to simulate the dynamics of the activities of calcium and chloride ion channels in algae (Beilby 1982, 2007). However, the activation/inactivation of ions channels is instead connected with the translocation of charged segments of the channel and changes in its conformation (Fig. 3a) (Dreyer and Blatt 2009), i.e. being constructed of independent gating particles is unlikely. An alternative approach has been proposed in the works of Gradmann (Mummert and Gradmann 1991; Gradmann et al. 1993; Gradmann and Hoffstadt 1998a, b; Gradmann 2001a, b). This approach (Fig. 3b) considers closed and open states (inward and outward K+ channels, Cl− channels in some models) or closed, open and inactivated states (Ca2+ channels, Cl− channels in some models) (Gradmann 2001a, b; Sukhov and Vodeneev 2009; Beilby and Al Khazaaly 2016). In this case, the probabilities of these states are variables in the model of electrical activity; the dependence of the probabilities on the membrane potential can be described based on the equations of Läuger and Stark (Läuger and Stark 1970; Gradmann 2001a, b). It should be noted that this approach can be also used to describe the potential-dependent regulation of transport ATPases (Mummert and Gradmann 1991; Gradmann 2001a, b).
The regulation of the activities of transporters by ligands is possible in models that consider changes in the concentrations of regulatory agents in cell compartments (e.g. the cytoplasm). In particular, inositol-3-phosphate (Wacke and Thiel 2001; Wacke et al. 2003; Beilby and Al Khazaaly 2016; Novikova et al. 2017), Ca2+ (Sukhov and Vodeneev 2009; Hills et al. 2012; Sukhov et al. 2012; Novikova et al. 2017) and H+ (Hills et al. 2012) have been described as such agents in different models. The Hill equation is widely used to describe the regulation of the activities of ion transporters by different ligands in models of electrical activity in plants (Sukhov and Vodeneev 2009; Hills et al. 2012; Novikova et al. 2017) and can also be used for the regulation of transporter activities by physical factors (e.g. light) (Hills et al. 2012). It should be noted that simulation of the regulation of certain transport processes (e.g. the regulation of Ca2+ channels affecting internal stores by inositol-3-phosphate) requires the description of several states of ion transporters and the solution of differential equations (Wacke and Thiel 2001; Wacke et al. 2003; Beilby and Al Khazaaly 2016).
In addition to descriptions of the membrane potential, ion transporters and their regulation, the models of electrical activity in plants can consider changes in the concentrations of ions and the buffer capacities of the apoplast, cytoplasm, vacuole, etc. (Gradmann 2001a, b; Shabala et al. 2006; Sukhov and Vodeneev 2009; Hills et al. 2012; Novikova et al. 2017). The buffer capacities can be described using the chemical equations of the interaction of the buffer and ions (Gradmann 2001a, b; Sukhov and Vodeneev 2009; Novikova et al. 2017) or based on empirical equations (Hills et al. 2012; Novikova et al. 2017). In addition, some models of electrical responses in plants (Sukhov and Vodeneev 2009; Vodeneev et al. 2012; Sukhov et al. 2013; Novikova et al. 2017) describe the reception of the action of environmental factors and/or the action of regulatory agents on plant cells (e.g. changes in temperature using Q10).
Thus, there are a number of approaches to the detailed simulation of the electrical activity in plants. However, there are other ways to describe plant electrical responses. One approach is based on equivalent electrical circuits, which include only standard electrical elements (batteries, resistors, capacitors, diodes, switches, etc.) without an additional description of regulatory processes. The elements qualitatively reflect general properties of the biological membrane and the main groups of ion transporters in this membrane (Volkov et al. 2009, 2010, 2017). In some works, these equivalent electrical circuits were used for the theoretical prediction of the electrical properties of plants (Volkov et al. 2009, 2010) and to analyse the results of experimental measurements (Volkov et al. 2017).
Another approach is based on the application of regression equations that connect parameters the stimulation (‘input’) and parameters of the electrical response (‘output’); both linear and nonlinear systems of estimators can be used (Chatterjee et al. 2014, 2015). Neural networks can also be used to describe the connections between ‘input’ and ‘output’ (Chen et al. 2016). The main advantage of this approach is the possibility of predicting the electrical activity under a given stimulation (or detecting stimulation parameters based on the properties of electrical responses) without information about the mechanisms of generation of the electrical responses. However, these models cannot be used to investigate the mechanisms of electrical responses and cannot predict the responses of the plant cell to novel, unknown conditions.
Basic Mathematical Models of Generation of Electrical Responses in Plants
The first mathematical model of the generation of electrical responses in plants was proposed in the works of (Beilby and Coster 1979; Beilby 1981, 1982), which adapted the Hodgkin–Huxley model to describe the action potential in Chara (Fig. 4a). The model included the activities of Ca2+ and Cl− channels and a reductive description of the dynamics of gating particles in these channels (gating particles relax to new stationary states); the activity of Na+ channels was not described in the model, because the channels seems to be unique to animal kingdom and that part of the Hodgkin–Huxley model is unsuitable for plants. The model of Beilby described the experimental AP in Chara well and showed that the Hodgkin–Huxley model can be used to simulate plant electrical activity. However, a number of fundamental properties of plant electrogenesis (the active transport of ions, changes in ion concentrations and buffer capacities, the regulation of transporters by ligands, etc.) were not considered in the model.
Despite these restrictions, the Hodgkin–Huxley model was used in some models of ESs in higher plants. In particular, the model of Zhao et al. (2013) described a multicellular system in which each cell is a point source of electrical current, and this current was simulated based on the modified Hodgkin–Huxley equation. The Laplace equation described changes in the electrical potential in extracellular space. The model was used to investigate the quantitative relationship between the intracellular and extracellular potentials of plant cells. It was shown that the results of extracellular measurements were a spatiotemporal superposition of signals induced by the simultaneous electrical activities of numerous cells in plants.
The next model of plant electrical activity simulated AP in the green algae Acetabularia (Mummert and Gradmann 1991). This model described a system of passive and active ion transporters (Cl−-ATPase, K+ and Cl− channels) and their regulation by membrane potential, based on a calculation of the probability of the open state of the transporter. The model quantitatively described the depolarization-induced AP in Acetabularia. However, it was not used to analyse the electrical activity of higher plants, liverworts, and Characeae, because the mechanism of AP generation in Acetabularia (a transient inactivation of Cl−-ATPase) is unique (Gradmann 1976).
The later models of Gradmann and co-workers (Gradmann et al. 1993; Gradmann and Buschmann 1997; Gradmann and Hoffstadt 1998a, b; Gradmann 2001a, b) described electrical oscillations in higher plants (Fig. 4b). All models were based on the kinetic description of regulation of systems of ions transport, including active transporters of ions (Gradmann and Boyd 2005) and ion channels (Gradmann et al. 1993; Gradmann and Buschmann 1997). The description took into account two or three states of transporters, the states had different activities, and the transitions between states were dependent on the membrane potential. All models described Cl−, inward and outward K+ channels, H+-ATPase and 2H+/Cl− symporter. The descriptions of transporters were based on the modified ohmic equations in early models (Gradmann et al. 1993) and on the Goldman–Hodgkin–Katz flux equation in the later models (Gradmann and Hoffstadt 1998a, b; Gradmann 2001a, b). Changes in ion concentrations in the cytoplasm and apoplast and their buffer capacities were also described in the models (Gradmann 2001a, b).
Analysis of Gradmann’s models (Gradmann et al. 1993; Gradmann and Hoffstadt 1998a, b; Gradmann 2001a, b) of the electrical activity in plants showed that the models described a periodic generation of electrical impulses, and the dynamics of the membrane potential during these oscillations was similar to the dynamics during the generation of AP in plants. The parameters of the oscillations were dependent on apoplast volume (Gradmann 2001a) and ion concentrations (Gradmann and Hoffstadt 1998a, b). In addition, it has been shown (Shabala et al. 2006) that Gradmann’s model of electrical oscillations imitated periodic changes in ions fluxes. These periodic changes were observed in certain ranges of external temperatures and ionic concentrations; the activity of H+-ATPase and cell size also influenced the parameters of the simulated oscillations (Shabala et al. 2006).
The models of electrical oscillations by Gradmann and co-workers (Gradmann et al. 1993; Gradmann and Hoffstadt 1998a, b; Gradmann 2001a, b) simulated periodic electrical responses in plants well; however, there were several problems that required subsequent works. (i) Gradmann’s models were not used for the simulation of stimulus-induced electrical responses (LERs and ESs). (ii) These models did not consider certain non-electrogenic systems of ion transport (e.g. H+/K+-antiporter), and the absence of these transporters can influence the simulated stationary ion concentrations. (iii) The models did not describe the regulation of ion transporters by Ca2+ and other chemical ligands. As a result, other models of the plant’s electrical activity were developed.
The problems were partly solved in our models of electrical responses in plants (Sukhov and Vodeneev 2009; Sukhov et al. 2013; Sherstneva et al. 2016b). The first was the model of the generation of action potential in higher plants (Sukhov and Vodeneev 2009). This model was based on Gradmann’s detailed description of electrical activity in plants (Gradmann 2001a, b); however, it had a number of new elements. First, the model described the regulation of H+-ATPase and Cl− channel activities by Ca2+; Ca2+ channels and Ca2+-ATPase were included in the model (Sukhov and Vodeneev 2009). Second, the model described the K+/H+-antiporter, which participated in establishing the stationary K+ and H+ concentrations. The proposed model imitated electrical- and cooling-induced LERs, which included APs, were similar to experimental electrical responses and were suppressed at a low concentration of external Ca2+ (Sukhov and Vodeneev 2009). Analysis of the model theoretically showed that H+-ATPase played the main role in the resting electrical potential of the plasma membrane and in the repolarization during AP. This result is in a good accordance with the literature data about the important role of the H+-ATPase in the formation of the resting membrane potential in Characeae (Beilby 1984) and guard cells of higher plants (Blatt 1987). It has also been shown that the Ca2+-dependent transient inactivation of the H+-ATPase weakly participated in the development of the AP depolarization; however, it played the key role in the development of pH changes during the generation of the action potential (Sukhov and Vodeneev 2009).
The work of Sukhov and Vodeneev (2009) was based on modelling the variation potential (Sukhov et al. 2013) (Fig. 4c). The VP model additionally described the production and propagation of the specific chemical signal (wound substance, WS) that was likely to participate in the propagation of the variation potential (Vodeneev et al. 2012, 2015) and the subsequent activation of the WS-dependent Ca2+ channels, which caused the development of the electrical response (Sukhov et al. 2013). The simulation showed that the parameters of VP (amplitude, number of ‘AP-like’ spikes, shape, etc.) were dependent on the amount of WS (i.e. the intensity of damage) (Sukhov et al. 2013). Later, this VP model was used for the theoretical analysis of the influence of the variation potential on photosynthetic parameters (Sherstneva et al. 2016b). Based on previous experimental results (Sherstneva et al. 2016a), empirical linear dependences of the photosynthetic parameters on changes in intra- and extracellular pH were used. It was shown (Sherstneva et al. 2016b) that the VP model simulated the dependence of the photosynthetic response on the intensity of damage and distance from the damaged zone.
It should be noted that the described models of electrical activity in plants did not take into account the participation of intracellular compartments (endoplasmic reticulum, vacuole, chloroplast, mitochondria, etc.) in the generation of electrical responses and/or the development of physiological changes. The mathematical models of the next group considered the transmission of signals from the plasma membrane and cytoplasm to intracellular compartments. The imitation of this transmission can be used for detailed descriptions of the generation of electrical response as well as for simulation of the development of changes in physiological processes.
A number of models in this group simulated the participation of intracellular sources of Ca2+ in the generation of electrical responses. The model of Biskup et al. (1999), which simulated excitation in Chara, considered an intracellular source of Ca2+ and described the additional increase in the concentration of calcium ions during the generation of the electrical response. Later, other investigators (Wacke and Thiel 2001; Wacke et al. 2003) adapted Othmer’s model (Othmer 1997) to describe the AP generation in Chara. The model of (Wacke and Thiel 2001; Wacke et al. 2003) included IP3-dependent Ca2+ channels in intracellular compartments, which were also Ca2+ dependent, and described the processes of synthesis and utilization of inositol-3-phosphate. This model simulated an electrical current-induced transient increase in Ca2+ concentration (Ca2+ spikes) and showed the participation of the endoplasmic reticulum in the excitation of Chara (Wacke and Thiel 2001; Wacke et al. 2003); however, the dynamics of the membrane potentials were absent in these works.
The Wacke and Thiel model has been used in some later models that simulated the action potential in plants. A model by Beilby and Al Khazaaly (2016) simulated the action potential in Chara. This model described IP3 and Ca2+ dynamics using the Wacke and Thiel model; the Ca2+ influx through TRP (transient receptor potential)-like channels was also assumed in the model. Ion transporters were described using modified ohmic equations, the Goldman–Hodgkin–Katz flux equations and ‘two-state’ models of transporting ATPase. Analysis of the model showed that it simulated experimental APs in Chara under controlled conditions and at high concentrations of NaCl (Beilby and Al Khazaaly 2016). The Wacke and Thiel model was also used in our previous model of AP in the cells of higher plants (Novikova et al. 2017) to describe the dynamics of the concentration of IP3, which activated Ca2+ channels in the tonoplast (Fig. 4d). The model also described the K+ and Cl− channels of the vacuolar membranes. Descriptions of other transport and regulatory processes were based on the model of Sukhov and Vodeneev (2009) with modifications. Analysis of the model showed (Novikova et al. 2017) that growths of the volume and area of the vacuole increased the threshold for AP generation; however, the activation of calcium channels in the tonoplast was able to participate weakly in the generation of action potential in higher plants.
The next model addressed the activity of stomatal guard cells (Hills et al. 2012, computational platform ‘OnGuard’) and also described the generation of electrical responses in signals to intracellular compartments (vacuole) and the development of the physiological response (opening/closing stomata). This model described numerous ion transporters in the plasma membrane and tonoplast, buffers, different regulatory processes (including the regulation of ion transport by Ca2+, H+ and light), the metabolism of sucrose and malate, etc. It should be separately noted that this model described the pressure in compartments of the cell and its influence on stomatal aperture. This model by Hills et al. (2012) was in good accordance with experimental results and was used for the theoretical analysis of stomatal activities under different conditions, including electrical activities. Chen et al. (2012) used the model ‘OnGuard’ to investigate ion fluxes during the diurnal cycle; Minguet-Parramona et al. (2016) studied the participation of ion-transporting systems in the generation of Ca2+ oscillations and the role of these oscillations in the closing of stomatal guard cells. It should be noted that theoretical analysis in the previous work showed the mechanism of periodic opening of stomata, which was based on the interaction between active and passive ion transporters, oscillations of the membrane potential and changes in ion concentrations. Thus, the model by Hills et al. (2012) is the unique example of a model of electrical activity that describes electrical responses, signals to intracellular compartments and the development of the physiological response. However, this model describes only one (very important) physiological process, and the simulation of other electrical response-induced physiological changes (changes in photosynthesis, respiration, transpiration, resistance to stressors, etc.) is an important future task.
A review of ‘mechanistic’ models of the generation of electrical responses shows the following tendency: early models describe ion transporters in the plasma membrane, whereas contemporary models simulate signal transduction to intracellular compartments and the development of physiological changes. It is possible that future perspectives on the detailed simulation of electrical responses will be connected to the elaboration of models of the physiological responses of the plant cell to stressors, which will be based on descriptions of the electrical activity. These models (similar to ‘OnGuard’ by Hills et al. 2012) can be used to predict the response of plant cells under various environmental conditions.
However, the solution to the problem of predicting plant responses can be based on other approaches. First, regression equations (or neural networks) that connect the stimulation parameters (‘input’) and electrical response parameters (‘output’). This approach was used in the work of Chatterjee et al. (2014), which tested the efficiency of various linear (ARX, ARMAX, BJ and OE) and nonlinear (Nonlinear Hammerstein–Wiener and NLARX) estimators for the forward modelling of the electrical response induced by light in plant leaves, and the inverse modelling of the parameters of light stimuli based on experimental electrical responses. In the next work by Chatterjee et al. (2015), this approach was used to identify different stimuli (sodium chloride, sulphuric acid and ozone), based on the parameters of experimental electrical responses. An interesting example of inverse modelling was the work of Aditya et al. (2011), which used the inverse fast Fourier transform of parameters of the light-induced electrical activity in plants for control of the biomachine. The work of Chen et al. (2016), which used neural networks for classification of ESs, should also be noted. Thus, ‘non-mechanistic’ models are also being developed; it is possible that in future work, the models will be used for monitoring environmental conditions and plant physiological states.
Another approach is based on equivalent electrical circuits composed of standard electrical elements that imitate the electrical properties of plants. These circuits were developed for Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula) (Volkov et al. 2009), sensitive plant (Mimosa pudica) (Volkov et al. 2010, 2014), and aloe (Aloe vera L.) (Volkov et al. 2017).
Mathematical Models of Propagation of Electrical Signals in Plants
Simulating the propagation of long-distance signals through the plant is another important direction of modelling electrical activity. Simulation is an effective tool for the theoretical investigation of the connection between local electrical responses in the stimulated zone and physiological changes in unstimulated parts of the plant. There are various approaches to the description of ES propagation: a solitonic model (Maśka and Pietruszka 1995; Pietruszka et al. 1997), systems of electrically coupled excitable elements (Garkusha et al. 2002; Sukhov et al. 2011a, b), equivalent electrical circuits (Volkov et al. 2017), the transmission of ‘wound substance’ by a mass flow (Malone 1994) or turbulent diffusion (Vodeneev et al. 2012; Sukhov et al. 2013).
The model of AP propagation in plants by Pietruszka et al. (1997) was based on the similarity between the propagation of AP and the transmission of solitons (Maśka and Pietruszka 1995; Pietruszka et al. 1997). According to the Frenkel–Kontorova–Tomlinson model (Weiss and Elmer 1997), the transmission of soliton in a one-dimensional mechanical system can be described as the transduction of motion from the moving particle to the immobile one. This transmission is similar to AP propagation in the live organism: excited (depolarized) parts of the plasma membrane correspond to moving particles, while unexcited parts correspond to immobile particles. The model of AP propagation in plants (Pietruszka et al. 1997) described the electrical fields of K+, Ca2+ and Cl− using the full Lagrangian density function. The numerical solutions of the model’s equations included solutions (travelling waves) that preserve the shape and move without dissipation. The solutions were interpreted as propagating AP in plants. However, the model of Pietruszka et al. (1997) was not based on a detailed description of mechanisms of AP generation and propagation; therefore, its application to the analysis of the AP propagation is very limited.
The propagation of electrical signals can also be described by equivalent electrical circuits (Tsaplev and Zatsepina 1980; Opritov et al. 1991; Vodeneev et al. 2016; Volkov et al. 2017). First, the equivalent electrical circuits can be used to describe the passive propagation of electrotonic potentials in higher plants (Volkov et al. 2017). Second, the active propagation of ESs can be described based on the cable equation (Tsaplev and Zatsepina 1980; Opritov et al. 1991; Beilby 2007; Vodeneev et al. 2016). In this case, the ES-conducting excitable medium is simplistically described as a one-dimensional long cell or a chain of electrically coupled excitable cells (as in Chara algae, Sibaoka and Tabata 1981). The models imitated some properties of ESs, including the constant velocity of propagation (Tsaplev and Zatsepina 1980; Opritov et al. 1991; Beilby 2007). However, the ESs propagation is likely to be connected with three-dimensional excitable medium in higher plants, e.g. the symplast of parenchyma cells (Opritov et al. 1991; Vodeneev et al. 2016) or the symplast of parenchyma cells and sieve elements (Fromm and Lautner 2007).
The analysis of ES propagation in two-dimensional systems of excitable cells is another approach to the investigation of the transmission of electrical signals in plants. In the simplest variant, the analysis can be based on cellular automation models (Gerhardt et al. 1990). Garkusha et al. (2002) used the cellular automation model to describe the propagation of the light-induced ES (Fig. 5a). A two-dimensional system of cells was used, the electrical current during generation of ES in each cell was described as two meanders, and the probabilities of activation of neighbouring cells were used to describe the transmission of the electrical signal. This model (Garkusha et al. 2002) shows the effect of ES-simulated dependence of the signal’s velocity on the duration of depolarization and the probabilities of activation of neighbouring cells.
Models of the next group (Sukhov et al. 2011a, b) use the detailed description of the generation of the electrical response. Both models were based on the two-dimensional system of excitable elements (cells) with local electrical connections (Fig. 5b). The first model (Sukhov et al. 2011a) used previous descriptions of AP generation (Sukhov and Vodeneev 2009), which took into account ions transporters, Ca2+ regulation, cytoplasmic and apoplastic buffers, etc.; the ion fluxes between apoplasts of neighbouring cells were also described. Analysis of the model of AP propagation showed that it imitated the passive (electrotonic) and active propagation of the action potential; the parameters of this propagation were similar to the experimental values (Sukhov et al. 2011a). The model also showed that increasing the electrical conductance between cells accelerated the propagation of AP; however, this increase raised the threshold for generation of action potential. It should be noted that the model (Sukhov et al. 2011a) described a system of homogeneous elements, i.e. a symplast of excitable parenchyma in the vascular bundles, but sieve elements are the possible way of the action potential propagation, too (Fromm and Lautner 2007). Another model (Sukhov et al. 2011b) described the AP propagation through the heterogeneous system of elements: the two-dimensional system of high-excitable cells (symplast) included lines of cells with the high intercellular conductance and low excitability (sieve elements). The FitzHugh–Nagumo model was used to describe AP generation in each of the cells. Analysis of this heterogeneous model showed that a combination of the symplast of parenchyma cells and sieve elements contributed to more effective generation and propagation of electrical signals than the homogeneous system, including high-excitability elements with low intercellular electrical conductance or low-excitable elements with high intercellular electrical conductance (Sukhov et al. 2011b).
Thus, the application of two-dimensional systems of excitable elements (in future work, three-dimensional ones) is an effective tool for analysis of the propagation of the action potential in plants. However, the propagation of other important ESs in plants, namely, VP, can be connected to the transmission of hydraulic and/or chemical signals (Vodeneev et al. 2016); as a result, other methods of description of the signal propagation are necessary. There are only a few models of VP propagation (Malone 1994; Vodeneev et al. 2012, 2015, 2017; Sukhov et al. 2013) based on the description of a chemical signal (transmission of wound substance, WS). First, Malone (1994) proposed the model of wound-induced mass flow, which induced the propagation of WS. This model was based on the Hagen–Poiseuille law. It was theoretically shown that the velocity of WS transmission can be on the order of tens of cm s−1, and this mechanism can participate in VP propagation (Malone 1994; Vodeneev et al. 2015). Second, our early works (Vodeneev et al. 2012; Sukhov et al. 2013) showed that WS transmission can be described by the one-dimensional diffusion equation. This description was correct for the diffusion of WS in turbulent flow (Vodeneev et al. 2012), which can be the result of water flow through xylem (Roth 1996) and changes in a hydraulic pressure after local damages (Vodeneev et al., 2012). The elaborated model imitated changes in VP parameters with the increasing distance from the damaged zone (Sukhov et al. 2013). This model was modified in a subsequent work (Vodeneev et al. 2017); a new variant of the model additionally included the secondary production of WS in the undamaged parts of the plant (Fig. 5c). The modified model accurately described the dependence of the velocity of VP propagation on the type of damage (mechanical wounding, heat, and burn).
Conclusion and Future Perspective
A review of current works on the simulation of plant electrical activity (Fig. 6) shows that there are numerous models simulating the generation of electrical responses on the plasma membrane. Various descriptions are used in these models, from modifications of the classical Hodgkin–Huxley model to detailed models, including numerous ions transporters, regulatory processes, buffers, etc. These models are widely used in theoretical investigations of the mechanisms of electrical responses. A moderate number of works has simulated the processes of ES propagation. Simulation of the AP propagation and the electrotonic transmission of electrical signals are usually based on the equivalent electrical circuit or the system of electrically connected excitable elements. There are few models of VP propagation; they are based on descriptions of the propagation of chemical signals. The transmission of signals to intracellular compartments (endoplasmic reticulum, vacuole) is also described in a moderate quantity of works. There are only a few works that describe the connection of the electrical activity and physiological processes; in particular, the ES influence on the functional state is weakly investigated. There are no models simulating the influence of electrical responses on the resistance of these organisms to adverse factors; however, there are a few works (Beilby and Casanova 2014; Beilby and Al Khazaaly 2016) which investigate the mechanisms of the salt tolerance of the Chara algae analysing the mathematical model of its electrical activity. The problem of inverse modelling (the identification of stimuli based on electrical response analysis) is also weakly investigated. In addition, it should be noted that the described models solve particular problems of plant electrogenesis, and the integration of these models into general models is a separate task.
Thus, the first problem of simulating plant electrical activity is the elaboration and development of models that simulate AP and VP propagations, the transmission of signals to intracellular compartments, the influence of ES on physiological processes and, especially, plant resistance to stressors. In particular, an interesting and important task is the elaboration of a model that simulates the reception of various external stressors by means of changes in electrical activity and imitates the development of physiological responses (modifications of photosynthesis, respiration, transpiration, resistance, etc.) to these stressors. With such elaboration, the model will be an effective tool for the theoretical prediction of plant responses to various factors.
The second important problem of simulation of electrical activity in plants is the analysis of interaction of ESs propagation with the Ca2+ and ROS signals (Gilroy et al. 2016). It is probable that solution of the problem requires a description of activation of TPC channels and ROS cascades in the model, because this activation has recently been shown in plants (Hedrich et al. 2016).
The third general problem is the elaboration of a tool to integrate several specific models of different aspects of the plant electrical activity (specific models of the generation of electrical responses, their propagation, the transmission of signals to intracellular compartments, the development of various physiological responses, etc.) into the common model for the solution of the specific problem; different combinations of specific models can be used for solution of different specific problems in field of the plant electrogenesis. The tool will be a ‘comprehensive model space’ (this term was proposed for photosynthetic models, Nedbal et al. 2009), which will include a database of specific models of the electrical activity. The comprehensive model space will be used to choose a group of specific models for the analysis of the investigated problem, to hierarchically organize these models and to support the data communication between them.
References
Aditya K, Udupa G, Lee Y (2011) Development of bio-machine based on the plant response to external stimuli. J Robot. doi:10.1155/2011/124314
Beilby MJ (1981) Excitation-revealed changes in cytoplasmic Cl- concentration in “Cl–starved” Chara cells. J Membr Biol 62:207–218
Beilby MJ (1982) C1- channels in Chara. R Soc Lond B 299:435–445
Beilby MJ (1984) Current-voltage characteristics of the proton pump at Chara plasmalemma: I. pH dependence. J Membr Biol 81:113–125
Beilby MJ (2007) Action potential in Charophytes. Int Rev Cytol 257:43–82
Beilby MJ, Al Khazaaly SA (2016) Re-modeling Chara action potential: I. from Thiel model of Ca2+ transient to action potential form. AIMS. Biophysics 3(3):431–449
Beilby MJ, Casanova MT (2014) The physiology of characean cells. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg
Beilby MJ, Coster HGL (1979) The action potential in Chara coralline: III. The Hodgkin-Huxley parameters for the plasmalemma. Aust J Plant Physiol 6:355–365
Biskup B, Gradmann D, Thiel G (1999) Calcium release from InsP3-sensitive internal stores initiates action potential in Chara. FEBS Lett 453:72–76
Blatt MR (1987) Electrical characteristics of stomatal guard cells: The contribution of ATP-dependent, “electrogenic” transport revealed by current-voltage and difference-current-voltage analysis. J Membr Biol 98:257–274
Bulychev AA, Vredenberg WJ (1995) Enchancement of the light-triggered electrical response in plant cells following their de-energisation witch uncouplers. Physiol Plant 94:64–70
Chatterjee SK, Ghosh S, Das S, Manzella V, Vitaletti A, Masi E, Santopolo L, Mancuso S, Maharatna K (2014) Forward and inverse modelling approaches for prediction of light stimulus from electrophysiological response in plants. Measurement 53:101–116
Chatterjee SK, Das S, Maharatna K, Masi E, Santopolo L, Mancuso S, Vitaletti A (2015) Exploring strategies for classification of external stimuli using statistical features of the plant electrical response. J R Soc Interface 12:20141225
Chen Z-H, Hills A, Bätz U, Amtmann A, Lew VL, Blatt MR (2012) Systems dynamic modeling of the stomatal guard cell. Predicts emergent behaviors in transport, signaling, and volume control. Plant Physiol 159:1235–1251
Chen Y, Zhao D-J, Wang Z-Y, Wang Z-Y, Tang G, Huang L (2016) Plant electrical signal classification based on waveform similarity. Algorithms 9:70
Dreyer I, Blatt MR (2009) What makes a gate? The ins and outs of Kv-like K+ channels in plants. Trends Plant Sci 14:383–390
Dziubinska H, Filek M, Koscielniak J, Trebacz K (2003) Variation and action potentials evoked by thermal stimuli accompany enhancement of ethylene emission in distant nonstimulated leaves of Vicia faba minor seedlings. J Plant Physiol 160:1203–1210
Felle HH, Zimmermann MR (2007) Systemic signaling in barley through action potentials. Planta 226:203–214
Filek M, Kościelniak J (1997) The effect of wounding the roots by high temperature on the respiration rate of the shoot and propagation of electric signal in horse bean seedlings (Vicia faba L. minor). Plant Sci 123:39–46
Fisahn J, Hansen UP, Lucas WJ (1992) Reaction kinetic model of a proposed plasma membrane two-cycle H+-transport system of Chara corallina. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:3261–3265
Fisahn J, Herde O, Willmitzer L, Peña-Cortés H (2004) Analysis of the transient increase in cytosolic Ca2+ during the action potential of higher plants with high temporal resolution: requirement of Ca2+ transients for induction of jasmonic acid biosynthesis and PINII gene expression. Plant Cell Physiol 45:456–459
Fromm J (1991) Control of phloem unloading by action potentials in Mimosa. Physiol Plant 83:529–533
Fromm J, Bauer T (1994) Action potentials in maize sieve tubes change phloem translocation. J Exp Bot 45:463–469
Fromm J, Fei H (1998) Electrical signaling and gas exchange in maize plants of drying soil. Plant Sci 132:203–213
Fromm J, Lautner S (2007) Electrical signals and their physiological significance in plants. Plant, Cell Environ 30:249–257
Furch ACU, Zimmermann MR, Will T, Hafke JB, van Bel AJE (2010) Remote-controlled stop of phloem mass flow by biphasic occlusion in Cucurbita maxima. J Exp Bot 61:3697–3708
Gallé A, Lautner S, Flexas J, Fromm J (2015) Environmental stimuli and physiological responses: the current view on electrical signalling. Environ Exp Bot 114:15–21
Garkusha IV, Petrov VA, Vasiliev VA, Romanovsky YuM (2002) Propagating of bioelectric potentials in green plants’ conducting system. Mathematical modeling and experiment. Proc SPIE 4707:384–394
Gerhardt M, Schuster H, Tyson JJ (1990) A cellular automation model of excitable media including curvature and dispersion. Science 247:1563–1566
Gilroy S, Białasek M, Suzuki N, Górecka M, Devireddy AR, Karpiński S, Mittler R (2016) ROS, calcium, and electric signals: key mediators of rapid systemic signaling in plants. Plant Physiol 171:1606–1615
Gradmann D (1976) “Metabolic” action potentials in Acetabularia. J Membr Biol 29:23–45
Gradmann D (2001a) Impact of apoplast volume on ionic relations in plant cells. J Membr Biol 184:61–69
Gradmann D (2001b) Models for oscillations in plants. Aust J Plant Physiol 28:577–590
Gradmann D, Boyd M (1995) Membrane voltage of marine phytoplankton, measured in the diatom Coscinodiscus radiatus. Mar Biol 123:645–650
Gradmann D, Boyd CM (2005) Apparent charge of binding site in ion-translocating enzymes: kinetic impact. Eur Biophys J 34:353–357
Gradmann D, Buschmann P (1997) Oscillatory interactions between voltage gated electroenzymes. J Exp Bot 48:399–404
Gradmann D, Hoffstadt J (1998) Electrocoupling of ion transporters in plants: interaction with internal ion concentrations. J Membr Biol 166:51–59
Gradmann D, Blatt MR, Thiel G (1993) Electrocoupling of ion transporters in plants. J Membr Biol 136:327–332
Graham JS, Hall G, Pearce G, Ryan CA (1986) Regulation of proteinase inhibitors I and II mRNAs in leaves of wounded tomato plants. Planta 169:399–405
Grams TEE, Koziolek C, Lautner S, Matyssek R, Fromm J (2007) Distinct roles of electric and hydraulic signals on the reaction of leaf gas exchange upon re-irrigation in Zea mays L. Plant, Cell Environ 30:79–84
Grams TE, Lautner S, Felle HH, Matyssek R, Fromm J (2009) Heat-induced electrical signals affect cytoplasmic and apoplastic pH as well as photosynthesis during propagation through the maize leaf. Plant, Cell Environ 32:319–326
Hansen U-P, Gradmann D, Sanders D, Slayman CL (1981) Interpretation of current-voltage relationships for “active” ion transport systems: I. Steady-state reaction-kinetic analysis of class-I mechanisms. J Membr Biol 63:165–190
Hansen U-P, Tittor J, Gradmann D (1983) Interpretation of current-voltage relationships for “active” ion transport systems: II. Nonsteady-state reaction kinetic analysis of class-I mechanisms with one slow time-constant. J Membr Biol 75:141–169
Hauser H, Levine BA, Williams RJP (1976) Interactions of ions with membranes. Trends Biochem Sci 1:278–281
Hedrich R, Salvador-Recatalà V, Dreyer I (2016) Electrical wiring and long-distance plant communication. Trends Plant Sci 21:376–387
Hills A, Chen Z-H, Amtmann A, Blatt MR, Lew VL (2012) OnGuard, a computational platform for quantitative kinetic modeling of guard cell physiology. Plant Physiol 159:1026–1042
Hlavinka J, Nožková-Hlaváčková V, Floková K, Novák O, Nauš J (2012) Jasmonic acid accumulation and systemic photosynthetic and electrical changes in locally burned wild type tomato, ABA-deficient sitiens mutants and sitiens pretreated by ABA. Plant Physiol Biochem 54:89–96
Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF (1952) A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol 117:500–544
Katicheva L, Sukhov V, Akinchits E, Vodeneev V (2014) Ionic nature of burn-induced variation potential in wheat leaves. Plant Cell Physiol 55:1511–1519
Katicheva L, Sukhov V, Bushueva A, Vodeneev V (2015) Evaluation of the open time of calcium channels at variation potential generation in wheat leaf cells. Plant Signal Behav 10:e993231
Krol E, Trebacz K (1999) Calcium-dependent voltage transients evoked by illumination in the liverwort Conocephalum conicum. Plant Cell Physiol 40:17–24
Krol E, Dziubinska H, Trebacz K (2003) Low-temperature induced transmembrane potential changes in the liverwort Conocephalum conicum. Plant Cell Physiol 44:527–533
Krol E, Dziubińska H, Trebacz K (2004) Low-temperature-induced transmembrane potential changes in mesophyll cells of Arabidopsis thaliana, Helianthus annuus and Vicia faba. Physiol Plant 120:265–270
Krol E, Dziubinska H, Stolarz M, Trebacz K (2006) Effects of ion channel inhibitors on cold- and electrically-induced action potentials in Dionaea muscipula. Biol Plant 50:411–416
Król E, Dziubińska H, Trebacz K (2010) What do plants need action potentials for? In: Action Potential: DuBois ML (ed.) Biophysical and Cellular Context, Initiation, Phases and Propagation. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 1-26
Krupenina NA, Bulychev AA (2007) Action potential in a plant cell lowers the light requirement for non-photochemical energy-dependent quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim Biophys Acta 1767:781–788
Läuger P, Stark G (1970) Kinetics of carrier-mediated ion transport across lipid bilayer membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta 211:458–466
Lautner S, Grams TEE, Matyssek R, Fromm J (2005) Characteristics of electrical signals in poplar and responses in photosynthesis. Plant Physiol 138:2200–2209
Lautner S, Stummer M, Matyssek R, Fromm J, Grams TEE (2014) Involvement of respiratory processes in the transient knockout of net CO2 uptake in Mimosa pudica upon heat stimulation. Plant, Cell Environ 37:254–260
León J, Rojo E, Sánchez-Serrano JJ (2001) Wound signaling in plant. J Exp Bot 52:1–9
Malone M (1994) Wound-induced hydraulic signals and stimulus transmission in Mimosa pudica L. New Phytol 128:49–56
Mancuso S (1999) Hydraulic and electrical transmission of wound-induced signals in Vitis vinifera. Aust J Plant Physiol 26:55–61
Maśka M, Pietruszka M (1995) On the φ 4 field theoretical model for the action potential. J Biol Phys 21:211–222
Minguet-Parramona C, Wang Y, Hills A, Vialet-Chabrand S, Griffiths H, Rogers S, Lawson T, Lew VL, Blatt MR (2016) An optimal frequency in Ca2+ oscillations for stomatal closure is an emergent property of ion transport in guard cells. Plant Physiol 170:33–42
Mousavi SAR, Chauvin A, Pascaud F, Kellenberger S, Farmer EE (2013) Glutamate receptor-like genes mediate leaf-to-leaf wound signalling. Nature 500:422–426
Mummert H, Gradmann D (1991) Action potentials in Acetabularia: measurement and simulation of voltage-gated fluxes. J Membr Biol 124:265–273
Murata N, Los DA (1997) Membrane fluidity and temperature perception. Plant Physiol 115:875–879
Nayyar H (2003) Calcium as environmental sensor in plants. Curr Sci 84:893–902
Nedbal L, Červený J, Schmidt H (2009) Scaling and integration of kinetic models of photosynthesis: towards comprehensive e-photosynthesis. In: Laisk A, Nedbal L, Govindjee (eds) Photosynthesis in silico. Understanding complexity from molecules to ecosystems. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 17–29
Novikova EM, Vodeneev VA, Sukhov VS (2017) Mathematical model of action potential in higher plants with account for the involvement of vacuole in the electrical signal generation. Biochem Moscow Suppl Ser A 11:151–167
Opritov VA, Pyatygin SS, Retivin VG (1991) Bioelectrogenesis in higher plants. Nauka, Moscow [in Russian]
Opritov VA, Lobov SA, Pyatygin SS, Mysyagin SA (2005) Analysis of possible involvement of local bioelectric responses in chilling perception by higher plants exemplified by Cucurbita pepo Russ. J Plant Physiol 52:801–808
Othmer HG (1997) Signal transduction and second messenger systems. In: Othmer HG, Adler FR, Lewis MA, Dallon J (eds) Case studies in mathematical modeling — ecology, physiology and cell biology. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 99–126
Pavlovič A, Slováková L, Pandolfi C, Mancuso S (2011) On the mechanism underlying photosynthetic limitation upon trigger hair irritation in the carnivorous plant Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula Ellis). J Exp Bot 62:1991–2000
Pietruszka M, Stolarek J, Pazurkiewicz-Kocot K (1997) Time evolution of the action potential in plant cells. J Biol Phys 23:219–232
Pikulenko MM, Bulychev AA (2005) Light-triggered action potentials and changes in quantum efficiency of photosystem II in Anthoceros cells. Russ J Plant Physiol 52:584–590
Pyatygin SS (2004) Role of plasma membrane in cold action perception in plant cells. Biol Membr (Moscow) 21:442–449
Pyatygin SS, Opritov VA, Khudyakov VA (1992) Subthreshold changes in excitable membranes of Cucurbita pepo L. stem cells during cooling-induced action-potential generation. Planta 186:161–165
Retivin VG, Opritov VA, Fedulina SB (1997) Generation of action potential induces preadaptation of Cucurbita pepo L. stem tissues to freezing injury. Russ J Plant Physiol 44:432–442
Retivin VG, Opritov VA, Lobov SA, Tarakanov SA, Khudyakov VA (1999) Changes in the resistance of photosynthesizing cotyledon cells of pumpkin seedlings to cooling and heating, as induced by the stimulation of the root system with KCl solution. Russ J Plant Physiol 46:689–696
Rhodes JD, Thain J, Wildon DC (1999) Evidence for physically distinct systemic signaling pathways in the wounded tomato plant. Ann Bot 84:109–116
Roth A (1996) Water transport in xylem conduits with ring thickenings. Plant, Cell Environ 19:622–629
Shabala S (2000) Ionic and osmotic components of salt stress specifically modulate net ion fluxes from bean leaf mesophyll. Plant, Cell Environ 23:825–837
Shabala S (2003) Physiological implications of ultradian oscillations in plant roots. Plant Soil 255:217–226
Shabala S, Knowles A (2002) Rhythmic patterns of nutrient acquisition by wheat roots. Funct Plant Biol 29:595–605
Shabala S, Newman I (1999) Light-induced changes in hydrogen, calcium, potassium, and chloride ion fluxes and concentrations from the mesophyll and epidermal tissues of bean leaves. Understanding the ionic basis of light-induced bioelectrogenesis. Plant Physiol 119:1115–1124
Shabala S, Shabala L, Gradmann D, Chen Z, Newman I, Mancuso S (2006) Oscillations in plant membrane transport: model predictions, experimental validation, and physiological implications. J Exp Bot 57:171–184
Shepherd VA, Beilby MJ, Al Khazaaly SA, Shimmen T (2008) Mechano-perception in Chara cells: the influence of salinity and calcium on touch-activated receptor potentials, action potentials and ion transport. Plant, Cell Environ 31:1575–1591
Sherstneva ON, Vodeneev VA, Katicheva LA, Surova LM, Sukhov VS (2015) Participation of intracellular and extracellular pH changes in photosynthetic response development induced by variation potential in pumpkin seedlings. Biochemistry (Moscow) 80:776–784
Sherstneva ON, Surova LM, Vodeneev VA, Plotnikova YuI, Bushueva AV, Sukhov VS (2016a) The role of the intra- and extracellular protons in the photosynthetic response induced by the variation potential in pea seedlings. Biochem Moscow Suppl Ser A 10:60–67
Sherstneva ON, Vodeneev VA, Surova LM, Novikova EM, Sukhov VS (2016b) Application of a mathematical model of variation potential for analysis of its influence on photosynthesis in higher plants. Biochem Moscow Suppl Ser A 10:269–277
Sibaoka T (1991) Rapid plant movements triggered by action potentials. Bot Mag Tokyo 104:73–95
Sibaoka T, Tabata T (1981) Electrotonic coupling between adjacent internodal cells of Chara braunii: Transmission of action potentials beyond the node. Plant Cell Physiol 22:397–411
Sokolik AI, Visotskaya Zh, Krytynskaya E, Yurin V (2001) Interaction of ion-transport mechanisms at the plasmalemma of plant cells. Plant Nutr 92:200–201
Stahlberg R, Cosgrove DJ (1997) The propagation of slow wave potentials in pea epicotyls. Plant Physiol 113:209–217
Stahlberg R, Cleland RE, van Volkenburgh E (2006) Slow wave potentials – a propagating electrical signal unique to higher plants. In: Baluška F, Mancuso S, Volkmann D (eds) Communication in plants. Neuronal aspects of plant life. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, pp 291–309
Sukhov V (2016) Electrical signals as mechanism of photosynthesis regulation in plants. Photosynth Res 130:373–387
Sukhov V, Vodeneev V (2009) A mathematical model of action potential in cells of vascular plants. J Membr Biol 232:59–67
Sukhov V, Nerush V, Orlova L, Vodeneev V (2011a) Simulation of action potential propagation in plants. J Theor Biol 291:47–55
Sukhov VS, Nerush VN, Vodeneev VA (2011b) An investigation of an action potential propagation in vascular plant using FitzHugh-Nagumo model. Comput Res Model 3:77–84 (in Russian)
Sukhov V, Orlova L, Mysyagin S, Sinitsina J, Vodeneev V (2012) Analysis of the photosynthetic response induced by variation potential in geranium. Planta 235:703–712
Sukhov V, Akinchits E, Katicheva L, Vodeneev V (2013) Simulation of variation potential in higher plant cells. J Membr Biol 246:287–296
Sukhov V, Sherstneva O, Surova L, Katicheva L, Vodeneev V (2014a) Proton cellular influx as a probable mechanism of variation potential influence on photosynthesis in pea. Plant, Cell Environ 37:2532–2541
Sukhov V, Surova L, Sherstneva O, Vodeneev V (2014b) Influence of variation potential on resistance of the photosynthetic machinery to heating in pea. Physiol Plant 152:773–783
Sukhov V, Surova L, Sherstneva O, Bushueva A, Vodeneev V (2015a) Variation potential induces decreased PSI damage and increased PSII damage under high external temperatures in pea. Funct Plant Biol 42:727–736
Sukhov V, Surova L, Sherstneva O, Katicheva L, Vodeneev V (2015b) Variation potential influence on photosynthetic cyclic electron flow in pea. Front Plant Sci 5:766
Sukhov V, Surova L, Morozova E, Sherstneva O, Vodeneev V (2016) Changes in H+-ATP synthase activity, proton electrochemical gradient, and pH in pea chloroplast can be connected with variation potential. Front Plant Sci 7:1092
Surova L, Sherstneva O, Vodeneev V, Katicheva L, Semina M, Sukhov V (2016a) Variation potential-induced photosynthetic and respiratory changes increase ATP content in pea leaves. J Plant Physiol 202:57–64
Surova L, Sherstneva O, Vodeneev V, Sukhov V (2016b) Variation potential propagation decreases heat-related damage of pea photosystem I by 2 different pathways. Plant Sign Behav 11:e1145334
Trebacz K, Sievers A (1998) Action potentials evoked by light in traps of Dionaea muscipula Ellis. Plant Cell Physiol 39:369–372
Trebacz K, Tarnecki R, Zawadzki T (1989) The effect of ionic channel inhibitors and factors modifying metabolism on the excitability of the liverwort Conocephalum conicum. Physiol Plant 75:24–30
Trebacz K, Dziubinska H, Krol E (2006) Electrical signals in long-distance communication in plants. In: Baluška F, Mancuso S, Volkmann D (eds) Communication in plants. Neuronal aspects of plant life. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, pp 277–290
Tsaplev YB, Zatsepina GN (1980) Electric nature of variable potential propagation in tradescantia. Biofizika 25:708–712
Vodeneev VA, Opritov VA, Pyatygin SS (2006) Reversible changes of extracellular ph during action potential generation in a higher plant Cucurbita pepo. Russ J Plant Physiol 53:481–487
Vodeneev VA, Akinchits EK, Orlova LA, Sukhov VS (2011) The role of Ca2+, H+, and Cl– ions in generation of variation potential in pumpkin plants. Russ J Plant Physiol 58:974–981
Vodeneev V, Orlova A, Morozova E, Orlova L, Akinchits E, Orlova O, Sukhov V (2012) The mechanism of propagation of variation potentials in wheat leaves. J Plant Physiol 169:949–954
Vodeneev V, Akinchits E, Sukhov V (2015) Variation potential in higher plants: mechanisms of generation and propagation. Plant Sign Behav 10:e1057365
Vodeneev VA, Katicheva LA, Sukhov VS (2016) Electrical signals in higher plants: mechanisms of generation and propagation. Biophysics 61:505–512
Vodeneev V, Mudrilov M, Akinchits E, Balalaeva I, Sukhov V (2017) Parameters of electrical signals and photosynthetic responses induced by them in pea seedlings depend on the nature of stimulus. Funct Plant Biol. doi:10.1071/FP16342
Volkov AG, Carrell H, Markin VS (2009) Biologically closed electrical circuits in Venus flytrap. Plant Physiol 149:1661–1667
Volkov AG, Foster JC, Markin VS (2010) Signal transduction in Mimosa pudica: biologically closed electrical circuits. Plant, Cell Environ 33:816–827
Volkov AG, Reedus J, Mitchell CM, Tuckett C, Volkova MI, Markin VS, Chua L (2014) Memory elements in the electrical network of Mimosa pudica L. Plant Signal Behav 9:e982029
Volkov AG, Nyasani EK, Tuckett C, Scott JM, Jackson MM, Greeman EA, Greenidge AS, Cohen DO, Volkova MI, Shtessel YB (2017) Electrotonic potentials in Aloe vera L.: effects of intercellular and external electrodes arrangement. Bioelectrochemistry 113:60–68
Wacke M, Thiel G (2001) Electrically triggered all-or-none Ca2+-liberation during action potential in the giant alga Chara. J Gen Physiol 118:11–21
Wacke M, Thiel G, Hütt M-T (2003) Ca2+ dynamics during membrane excitation of green alga Chara: model simulations and experimental data. J Membr Biol 191:179–192
Weiss M, Elmer F-J (1997) Dry friction in the Frenkel-Kontorova-Tomlinson model: dynamical properties. Z Phys B 104:55–69
Williamson RE, Ashley CC (1982) Free Ca2+ and cytoplasmic streaming in the alga Chara. Nature 296:647–651
Zhao DJ, Wanga Z-Y, Li J, Wena X, Liu A, Huanga L, Wangd X-D, Houd R-F, Wang C (2013) Recording extracellular signals in plants: a modeling and experimental study. Math Comput Model 58:556–563
Zhao DJ, Chen Y, Wang ZY, Xue L, Mao TL, Liu YM, Wang ZY, Huang L (2015) High-resolution non-contact measurement of the electrical activity of plants in situ using optical recording. Sci Rep 5:13425
Zimmermann MR, Maischak H, Mithöfer A, Boland W, Felle HH (2009) System potentials, a novel electrical long-distance apoplastic signal in plants, induced by wounding. Plant Physiol 149:1593–1600
Zimmermann MR, Mithöfer A, Will T, Felle HH, Furch ACU (2016) Herbivore-triggered electrophysiological reactions: candidates for systemic signals in higher plants and the challenge of their identification. Plant Physiol 170:2407–2419
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (Contract No. 6.3199.2017/PCh) and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Project No. 16-04-01694 A).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sukhova, E., Akinchits, E. & Sukhov, V. Mathematical Models of Electrical Activity in Plants. J Membrane Biol 250, 407–423 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-017-9969-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-017-9969-7