Introduction

The most important pathophysiological characteristics of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are the senile plaques and the neurofibrillary tangles. The major component of plaques is the amyloid-β peptide (Aβ). The Aβ is a highly hydrophobic peptide of 39–43 amino acids, released by the proteolitic cleavage of amyloid precursor protein (APP), and aggregates to form oligomers. These oligomers further aggregate into fibers, which deposit in the cerebral parenchyma, and originate the senile plaques through the amyloid cascade (Haass 2004). The neurotoxic effects of Aβ also involves changes in the neuronal membrane composition and structure, affecting its physicochemical properties.

APP is an integral membrane protein expressed in various cell types. Three isoforms (APP695, APP751, and APP770) are derived from the alternative splicing of same mRNA. It is a transmembrane protein of type I, with a long N-terminal extracellular portion, one single passage through the membrane, and a small intracellular C-terminal portion (Daly et al. 1998). It is one of the most abundant proteins in the central nervous system and is also expressed in peripheral tissues, such as muscular, epithelial, and blood cells (Di Luca et al. 2000; Skovronsky et al. 2001; Racchi and Govoni 2003).

Among the different peripheral cells that express APP, platelets represent an important source, as they contain more than 95% of the circulating APP. Both the secreted (soluble) fragment (sAPP) and the Aβ peptide are stored in the α-granules and released through platelet activation. Accordingly, Davies et al. (1997) demonstrated that platelets release the content of their granules under physiological stimuli secreting fragments of sAPP. Li et al. (1998) proposed that platelets contain all the enzymatic machinery to produce the by-products of the APP breakdown by the activity of the α-secretase (ADAM10) and β-secretase (BACE1). More recently, Tang et al. (2006) found in platelets of AD increased levels of Aβ, increased immunoreactivity of BACE1, and decreased immunoreactivity of ADAM10, indicating that the amyloidogenic pathway of the APP metabolism is activated in platelets of AD patients, paralleling the intracerebral APP processing in AD.

The first attempts to determine APP changes in platelets of AD patients, as a peripheral correlate of the biochemical abnormalities of the disease process, have addressed the ratio between two carboxyl-truncated fragments of sAPP (Di Luca et al. 1996). Western blots with the monoclonal antibody 22C11, which is raised to bind to the N-terminal portion of APP, have shown that the molecular weights of these platelet APP fragments are 120–130 and 110 kDa. Rosenberg et al. (1997) found that the ratio between 120-to-130- and 110-kDa APP was reduced in patients with AD as compared to controls. These findings were in accordance with those by Di Luca et al. (1996, 1998). Both groups have further implicated the reduced APP ratio with other biological and clinical features of the disease, namely, a greater effect in the presence of the apolipoprotein E4 allele (Rosenberg et al. 1997) and positive correlations between APP ratio and cognitive performance both in clinical (Baskin et al. 2000) and preclinical AD (Padovani et al. 2002). These data support the putative role of platelet APP as peripheral marker for AD.

Among other neurotoxic effects, Aβ disturbs several aspects of membrane metabolism. Aβ impacts on cholesterol homeostasis, modifying its distribution within the lipid bilayer and, thus, affecting membrane fluidity (reviewed by Wood et al. 2003). Such abnormality has been estimated by 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene (DPH) anisotropy (see “Materials and methods” for details), which is inversely correlated with membrane fluidity. A reduction in membrane fluidity has been consistently described in several regions of the AD brain (Müller et al. 1997), including hippocampal membranes (Eckert et al. 2000), and in animal models of AD (Müller et al. 1995). Conversely, anisotropy data in platelets of AD patients have so far proven inconsistent, with reports of increased membrane fluidity in familial (Zubenko et al. 1987a,b, 1999) but not in sporadic AD (Kukull et al. 1992; Fernandes et al. 1999).

The objective of the present study is to determine the proportion of 130- and 110-kDa fragments of APP in platelets from subjects with AD, with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and healthy elderly individuals and to investigate the association of this abnormality with membrane anisotropy, which has been consistently described in platelet membranes of AD patients as a consequence of abnormal membrane metabolism.

Materials and methods

Characteristics of the subjects

There were 23 patients with DA, 25 subjects with MCI, and 30 age-matched healthy controls enrolled to the study. All patients were recruited at the Memory Clinic of the Laboratory of Neuroscience (LIM 27), Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Brazil. Written informed consent was obtained after the procedures had been fully explained to all patients. The study was approved by the local ethics committee. Exclusion criteria were illiteracy, visual and hearing disabilities, and other relevant health conditions that could either affect cognition or limit the administration of neuropsychological tests. Patients with severe dementia, concomitant psychiatric diseases, and clinical evidence of cerebrovascular disease (as the main cause of cognitive decline) were also excluded.

Mental state examination was performed using the Cambridge examination for mental disorders in the elderly semi-structured interview (Roth et al. 1986), which comprises the following subtests in the Cambridge cognitive test (CAMCOG) schedule, the Blessed dementia scale (Blessed et al. 1968), the ten-item information, memory and concentration test (abbreviated mental test; Roth and Hopkins 1953), the mini-mental state examination (MMSE; Folstein et al. 1975), and the Hachinski ischemic score (Hachinski et al. 1975). The clock drawing test according to Sunderland et al. (1989) and the informant questionnaire on cognitive decline in the elderly (Jorm and Jacomb 1989) were also administered as screening test for cognitive impairment, and the 21-item Hamilton depression scale (Hamilton 1960) was used to evaluate depressive symptoms. Laboratorial exams were carried out for every patient, encompassing thyroid function, complete blood count, blood chemistry serum levels, folic acid and vitamin B12, blood lipid profile, and syphilis tests to rule out potentially reversible causes of cognitive impairment. Neuroimaging studies (computed tomography scans or magnetic resonance imaging) were completed in patients with suspected dementing disorders.

The neuropsychological battery included the Rivermead behavioral memory test (Wilson et al. 1985; Oliveira and Schmidt 1999), the Fuld object-memory evaluation (Fuld 1980), the trail making test A and B (Army Individual Test Battery 1944), the short cognitive test (Erzigkeit 1991; Flaks et al. 2006), and the Wechsler adult intelligence scale—revised vocabulary and block design tests (Wechsler 1981).

Diagnoses of dementia and AD were, respectively, made according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersIV (American Psychiatric Association 1994) and the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke–Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorder Association criteria (Mc Khann et al. 1984). Diagnosis of MCI was established according to Petersen et al. (1999) criteria.

Demographic and cognitive data of AD, MCI, and control subjects are presented in Table 1. In the AD group, 56.5% had mild or very mild dementia and 45.5% had moderate dementia, most of which (87%) were currently medicated with cholinesterase inhibitors. The MCI group was further subdivided into amnestic MCI (seven individuals, 28%), non-amnestic MCI (seven individuals, 28%), and multiple domain MCI (11 individuals, 44%).

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of cases and control subjects

Platelet collection and preparation

Peripheral blood (15 ml) was collected in 0.1 M sodium-citrate-coated tubes (S-Monovett, Sarsted). Blood samples were homogenized with 300 μl of 0.09 M ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid and centrifuged at 200 × g (1,300 rpm) for 10 min and at room temperature. Platelet-rich plasma was separated from blood cells, and platelets were collected by centrifugation at 1,159 × g (2,400 rpm) for 10 min at room temperature. Pellets were washed with 5 ml of 10 mM Tris, pH = 7.4, and resuspended in lysis buffer containing 10 mM Tris–HCl, pH = 7.4, 1 mM ethylne glycol tetraacetic acid, 100 mM phenylmethanesulphonyl fluoride, and protease inhibitors (M222, Amresco). Platelet aliquots were stored at −70°C. Protein concentrations were determined in each sample by a modified Lowry method (Bio-Rad DC Protein Assay) before the Western blot assay.

APP Western blotting

For each sample, 24 μg of protein (prepared in Laemmli sample buffer) was separated by electrophoresis in 8% polyacrylamide gels (120 V, 2 h) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (200 mA, 90 min). Unspecific bindings was blocked with nonfat milk, and membranes were subsequently incubated for 2 h with the primary antibody m22C11 (Chemicon International, dilution 1:1,500). Membranes were then incubated for 1 h with goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies labeled with horseradish peroxidase (Sigma, dilution 1:10,000), after which the enhanced chemoluminescence (ECL; GE) reagent was poured. Imaging was performed in a Chemiimager™ 4,000 equipment (Alpha Innotech), which captures the chemiluminescent light emission from the reaction of the peroxidase-conjugated antibody with the ECL reagent (GE). Light emission was continuously captured for 15 min, and the densitometry of distinct bands was performed with specific software tools. All measurements were registered as the proportion of the 130- to 110-kDa band densities (130- to 110-kDa ratio). An internal control (IC) consisting of a standard suspension of platelets (prepared in-house from a pool of platelets from young healthy volunteers) was added to each gel to control for analytical differences between blots performed in different days (inter-assay variation). The IC reading in proportion to the 130- to 110-kDa ratio was then calculated, yielding the normalized estimate of the 130- to 110-kDa ratio (APPr). Each sample was analyzed in triplicates, and additional blots of the same samples were performed whenever the reading between replicates displayed a variation >15%.

Membrane fluidity measurements

For anisotropy measurements, platelet isolation and platelet membrane homogenate preparation were performed according to a minor modification of the method of Zubenko et al. (1987a). Membrane fluidity of the individual platelet homogenates was determined using DPH as a fluorescence probe incorporated in the inner lipid bilayer. Samples were diluted with 5 mM Tris–HCl buffer, pH 7.4, to attain approximately 300 μg protein/ml. Anisotropy measurements were then performed in 5× replicate aliquots comprising 100 μl of working membrane samples incubated with 900 μl of Tris–HCl buffer and 1,000 μl of 33 μM DPH solution (prepared from a stock solution of 5 mM DPH in tetrahydrofuran) for 60 min at 37°C. The steady-state anisotropy was measured in a PTI spectrofluorometer (Photon Technology International, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA), using excitation and emission wavelengths of 360 and 450 nm, respectively. The maximum and minimum readings for each sample were systematically discarded, so that the statistical analysis was based on triplicates of each sample.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed with the aid of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 13.0 for Windows). Analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction for post hoc multiple comparisons was used to compare group means. Parametric correlations (Pearson correlations coefficients) were obtained for normal/small subsample data.

Results

The mean APPr was significantly reduced in the AD group as compared to controls (AD, 1.01 ± 0.21; controls, 1.24 ± 0.21, p = 0.001). In the MCI group, the mean APPr was 1.18 ± 0.21, with no significant difference as compared to controls (p = 0.904), but significantly reduced as compared to AD patients (p = 0.027; Table 2; Fig. 1). The mean DPH anisotropy values in the three diagnostic groups are presented in Table 2, but no significant differences were observed between the three groups. On the other hand, DPH anisotropy values were significantly correlated with 130- to 110-kDa APP ratio (r = 0.30, p = 0.01). Figure 2 illustrates the 130- and 110-kDa bands in a representative blot.

Table 2 The 130- to 110-kDa APP ratio (APPr) in AD, MCI, and control subjects
Fig. 1
figure 1

Quantitative analysis of the ratio between 130- and 110-kDa fragments of platelet amyloid precursor protein (APP) in control subjects and in MCI and AD patients

Fig. 2
figure 2

Representative Western blot analysis performed with the monoclonal antibody 22C11 in platelet homogenates showing 130- and 110-kDa fragments of amyloid precursor protein. MCI, mild cognitive impairment; AD, Alzheimer disease; IC, internal control

As the mean values of the APPr in each group were distributed in a normal curve, parametric tests were performed to assess the correlations between mean APPr values and the respective cognitive scores for each diagnostic group. We found positive correlations between APPr and the MMSE score (r = 0.33, p = 0.003), APPr and total CAMCOG (r = 0.37, p = 0.001), and APPr and the score on the memory of the CAMCOG (r = 0.38, p = 0.001; Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Pearson’s correlations between APP ratio and the raw numeric values of three cognitive measurements, irrespective of diagnostic classification. The ratio between 130- and 110-kDa APP fragments in platelets was positively correlated with total MMSE scores (r = 0.33, p = 0.003), total CAMCOG scores (r = 0.37, p = 0.001), and the memory sub-score of the CAMCOG schedule (r = 0.38, p = 0.001)

Discussion

Platelets contain more than 95% of the total circulating APP, 10% of which corresponds to the full-length protein. The remaining 90% of platelet APP corresponds to carboxyl-truncated secreted (soluble) APP residues (APPs) of 751 or 770 amino acids, which bear the Kunitz proteinase inhibitor domain, and are stored in the α-granules. These granules also contain amounts of Aβ. The simultaneous presence of both APPs and Aβ suggests that platelets contain the enzymatic machinery necessary for APP processing (Li et al. 1998). Thus, the abnormal regulation of APP processing, which leads to the accumulation of Aβ in the AD brain, may be also represented in platelets. Should this hypothesis prove correct, then the determination of APP metabolites in platelets might yield an insight into this seminal process in the pathophysiology of AD, reinforcing its role in the search of peripheral markers of the disease. The measurement of 130- to 110-kDa APP ratio in platelets fulfills some critical requirements for the selection of a candidate biomarker of AD, as platelets can be easily obtained in samples of peripheral blood, albeit requiring careful manipulation and processing.

Our results are in agreement with the previous finding of Di Luca et al. (1998) and Rosenberg et al. (1997). With regard to the ratio between 130- to 110-kDa APP in platelets (APPr), we found significant differences between AD patients and elderly controls (p = 0.001) and, to a lesser extent, between AD and MCI (p = 0.027). However, no significant differences were detected between controls and MCI (p = 0.904), although the latter group displayed intermediate values of APPr as compared to AD patients and controls. We further addressed the correlations between three cognitive variables (MMSE, total CAMCOG score, and memory subscore of the CAMCOG) and the APP ratios of patients (AD and MCI) and controls irrespective of their diagnostic categories. The same procedure was repeated for each diagnostic group separately, but no significant correlations were detected (data not shown). We understand that this may be due to the small intragroup variance of both measurements (i.e., APP ratios and cognitive scores) in addition to the reduced statistical power as a consequence of the numeric limitation of the subsamples. Thus, we argue that, in addition to the significant intergroup differences of mean APP ratio values (AD vs controls and AD vs MCI), this abnormality of APP metabolism is also positively correlated with the cognitive performance itself.

Other studies of platelet APP in patients with MCI and different stages of AD have shown statistically significant differences between controls and cognitively impaired subjects (MCI included), with a trend of decline of the mean APPr values along the progression of the disease. Nevertheless, no significant differences were found along the earlier stages of cognitive decline, i.e., between MCI and very mild/mild AD (Padovani et al. 2002). In the study by Di Luca et al. (1998), although platelet APPr was significantly decreased in severe AD as compared to mild AD, only marginally significant differences were detected between mild and moderate forms of the disease. It must be argued that MCI has not yet been established as a distinct clinical entity, given its biological and neuropsychological heterogeneity, which support important prognostic implications. In our sample, the MCI group was composed by amnestic, non-amnestic, and multiple-domain MCI subtypes. The association between MCI and AD is better defined for single- and multiple-domain amnestic types (Petersen 2005). With regard to the scores on cognitive screening tests, but not in the neuropsychological battery used for the diagnosis of MCI (data not shown), the performance of the MCI group was quite similar to the control group. Such result is expected, as the individuals with MCI generally perform well in the evaluation by MMSE and the CAMCOG, due to ceiling effects. Hence, these tests have low discriminatory power, rendering a careful neurophysiologic evaluation necessary. As the APPr values apparently depend on the stage of the underlying pathology in AD, one possible speculation is that our MCI group comprised cases of more subtle cognitive decline (given the mean total CAMCOG scores of 92.7), therefore, with putative, a longer time lag for the conversions to AD. A follow-up study of this MCI cohort is in course in our group, and the prospective evaluation of APPr values will help determine its prognostic value.

Although the numeric magnitude of the 130- to 110-kDa platelet APP ratio widely varied across the studies from Rosenberg et al. (1997), Di Luca et al. (1998), and our study, which results from methodological differences, the same tendencies were detected toward a reduction of the 130- to 110-kDa platelets APP ratio in AD as compared to controls. The analytical differences are probably due to preparation of platelet samples, determination of total protein levels, Western blotting, and radiographic development. Each of these steps yields variations (intra- and inter-testing) and, for this reason, the determination must have an IC (standard sample). In other words, the method is not quantitative.

The monoclonal antibody 22C11 recognizes the N-terminal portion of APP at the 66 and 81 amino acid residues. As this region corresponds to the extracellular portion of APP, it has been suggested that the antibody detects soluble APP (isoforms 770 and 751). The precise meaning of the reduction in platelet APP ratio in AD is not yet clear. If the amount of platelet APP corresponds to the soluble APP generated by the ADAM10 (non-amyloidogenic pathway) and this amount is diminished in AD, it could be hypothesized that the secretory, non-amyloidogenic pathway is reduced in platelets of AD patients, maybe due to a decrement in ADAM10 activity, an increase in BACE1 activity, or both. This speculation is in line with the recent findings of Tang et al. (2006), who determined by Western blot the simultaneous expression of APP specimens, Aβ peptide, BACE1, and ADAM10. Should these hypotheses prove correct, platelet levels of APP would reflect in a peripheral compartment the abnormalities of intracerebral APP metabolism that occur in AD patients.

Our anisotropy data further suggest that abnormal APP processing is associated with membrane fluidity abnormalities. However, this issue requires cautious interpretation. Although there are consistent reports of reduced membrane fluidity within the AD brain, as well as in laboratory models of membrane function after treatment with Aβ specimens, the DPH anisotropy of platelet membranes, as a putative peripheral correlate of such abnormality, is highly controversial. Zubenko et al. (1987a,b, 1999) have demonstrated a decrease in platelet DPH anisotropy (suggestive of increased membrane fluidity) in platelets in familial AD. Nevertheless, Kukull et al. (1992) and Fernandes et al. (1999) failed to demonstrate such differences in platelets of sporadic AD as compared to controls. This discrepancy in platelet anisotropy as compared to neuronal membranes may be attributed to the short life span of platelets, rendering the membranes less vulnerable to long-term modifications.

Longitudinal, neuropathologic, and biological marker studies suggest that diagnosis of MCI is associated with greater risks to the development of dementia. The current most consistent works to establish biological markers for AD or MCI are performed in cerebrospinal fluid (Hansson et al. 2006; Hampel et al. 2004; Maruyama et al. 2001), in which total and phosphorylated protein tau and Aβ42 peptide are measured by different analytical methods. However, this measurement requires a lumbar puncture, which is a more invasive method and not yet approved in many countries for this purpose. Therefore, the identification of an alternative or adjunctive peripheral marker, easily obtainable as in blood samples, would consist in valuable information for the diagnostic workout of AD in the clinical practice.