Abstract
Background: Psychosocial factors governing the use of postoperative, intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) have received little attention in spite of the fact that PCA is the most common modality for managing pain after surgery. The motivation behind requests for analgesia during lockout periods is not known. Unrelieved pain and need for pain medication are obvious reasons but other factors may be involved. The aim of the present study was to predict PCA lockout interval demands based on preoperative psychosocial factors.
Methods: Approximately one week before major abdominal gynecologic surgery, 117 women completed the impact of events scale (IES) measuring intrusive thoughts and avoidant behaviours. Pain was measured by visual analogue scale at three, six, 12, 24 and 48 hr after surgery. Measures of anxiety and negative affect were obtained 24 and 48 hr after surgery. Cumulative morphine consumption and every PCA demand (drug delivered and not delivered) were downloaded from the PCA pump.
Results: Multiple regression analyses revealed that preoperative intrusive thoughts and avoidant behaviours about the upcoming surgery positively predicted PCA lockout interval demands after controlling for postoperative pain, morphine consumption, anxiety, and negative affect (R2=0.45;P<0.0001). Path analysis showed a direct pathway from preoperative IES scores to lockout interval demands (β=0.23,P=0.002) which was not associated with untreated pain, anxiety, or negative affect.
Conclusions: Excessive demands for postoperative intravenous-PCA morphine during lockout intervals appear to reflect, in part, poor preoperative adaptation to surgery involving intrusive thoughts and avoidant behaviours about the upcoming surgery.
Résumé
Contexte: Les facteurs psychosociaux régissant l’usage d’analgésie postopératoire intraveineuse contrôlée par le patient (ACP) n’ont reçu que peu d’attention, malgré le fait que l’ACP constitue le mode le plus fréquent de prise en charge de la douleur après une chirurgie. Les motivations derrière les demandes d’analgésie durant les intervalles d’interdiction ne sont pas connues. Bien qu’une douleur qui n’est pas soulagée et le besoin de médicaments anti-douleur constituent des raisons évidentes, d’autres facteurs pourraient jouer un rôle. L’objectif de cette étude était de prédire les demandes d’ACP pendant les intervalles d’interdiction sur la base de facteurs psychosociaux préopératoires.
Méthode: Une semaine environ avant une chirurgie gynécologique abdominale importante, 117 femmes ont complété l’Échelle de répercussion des événements (IES — Impact of events scale) mesurant les pensées intrusives et les comportements d’évitement. La douleur a été mesurée à l’aide d’une échelle visuelle analogue à trois, six, 12, 24 et 48 h après la chirurgie. Les mesures de l’anxiété et de l’affect négatif ont été prises 24 et 48 h après la chirurgie. La consommation cumulative de morphine et chaque demande d’ACP (médicament fourni ou non) ont été enregistrées depuis la pompe d’ACP.
Résultats: L’analyse de régression multiple a révélé que les pensées intrusives avant l’opération et les comportements d’évitement au sujet de la chirurgie à venir constituaient des prédicteurs positifs de l’utilisation de l’ACP pendant les intervalles d’interdiction, et ce après avoir contrôlé pour la douleur postopératoire, la consommation de morphine, l’anxiété et l’affect négatif (R2=0,45 ; P<0,0001). L’analyse des pistes causales a montré une piste causale directe des scores IES préopératoires aux demandes d’ACP pendant les intervalles d’interdiction (β=0,23, P=0,002) qui n’étaient pas associées à une douleur non traitée, de l’anxiété, ou un affect négatif.
Conclusion: L’utilisation postopératoire excessive de morphine intraveineuse par ACP durant les intervalles d’interdiction semble refléter, en partie au moins, une mauvaise préparation préopératoire à la chirurgie impliquant des pensées intrusives et des comportements d’évitement quant à la chirurgie à venir.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Lehmann KA. Recent developments in patient-controlled analgesia. J Pain Symptom Manage 2005; 29: S72–89.
Dolin SJ, Cashman JN, Bland JM. Effectiveness of acute postoperative pain management: I. Evidence from published data. Br J Anaesth 2002; 89: 409–23.
Hudcova J, McNicol E, Quah C, Lau J, Carr DB. Patient controlled opioid analgesia versus conventional opioid analgesia for postoperative pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (4): CD003348.
Taylor N, Hall GM, Salmon P. Is patient-controlled analgesia controlled by the patient? Soc Sci Med 1996; 43: 1137–43.
Bainbridge D, Martin JE, Cheng DC. Patient-controlled versus nurse-controlled analgesia after cardiac surgery-a meta-analysis. Can J Anesth 2006; 53: 492–9.
Ginsberg B, Gil KM, Muir M, Sullivan F, Williams DA, Glass PS. The influence of lockout intervals and drug selection on patient-controlled analgesia following gynecological surgery. Pain 1995; 62: 95–100.
Savoia G, Loreto M, Gravino E. Sufentanil: an overview of its use for acute pain management. Minerva Anestesiol 2001; 67: 206–16.
Walder B, Schafer M, Henzi I, Tramer MR. Efficacy and safety of patient-controlled opioid analgesia for acute postoperative pain. A quantitative systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45: 795–804.
Werawatganon T, Charuluxanun S. Patient controlled intravenous opioid analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia for pain after intra-abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; (1): CD004088.
Miaskowski C. Patient-controlled modalities for acute postoperative pain management. J Perianesth Nurs 2005; 20: 255–67.
Badner NH, Doyle JA, Smith MH, Herrick IA. Effect of varying intravenous patient-controlled analgesia dose and lockout interval while maintaining a constant hourly maximum dose. J Clin Anesth 1996; 8: 382–5.
Momeni M, Crucitti M, De Kock M. Patient-controlled analgesia in the management of postoperative pain. Drugs 2006; 66: 2321–37.
Cokefair A, Smith HS, Gries CA. An investigation of the current literature on the effectiveness of patient-controlled analgesia methods. CRNA 1996; 7: 126–34.
Brandner B, Bromley L, Blagrove M. Influence of psychological factors in the use of patient controlled analgesia. Acute Pain 2002; 4: 53–6.
Gil KM, Ginsberg B, Muir M, Sullivan F, Williams DA. Patient controlled analgesia: the relation of psychological factors to pain and analgesic use in adolescents with postoperative pain. Clin J Pain 1992; 8: 215–21.
Gil KM, Ginsberg B, Muir M, Sykes D, Williams DA. Patient-controlled analgesia in postoperative pain: the relation of psychological factors to pain and analgesic use. Clin J Pain 1990; 6: 137–42.
Jamison RN, Taft K, O’Hara JP, Ferrante FM. Psychosocial and pharmacologic predictors of satisfaction with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Anesth Analg 1993; 77: 121–5.
Logan DE, Rose JB. Is postoperative pain a self-fulfilling prophecy? Expectancy effects on postoperative pain and patient-controlled analgesia use among adolescent surgical patients. J Pediatr Psychol 2005; 30: 187–96.
Ozalp G, Sarioglu R, Tuncel G, Aslan K, Kadiogullari N. Preoperative emotional states in patients with breast cancer and postoperative pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003; 47: 26–9.
Perry F, Parker RK, White PF, Clifford PA. Role of psychological factors in postoperative pain control and recovery with patient-controlled analgesia. Clin J Pain 1994; 10: 57–63; discussion 82–5.
Reynaert C, Janne P, Delire V, et al. To control or to be controlled? From health locus of control to morphine control during patient-controlled analgesia. Psychother Psychosom 1995; 64: 74–81.
Thomas V, Heath M, Rose D, Flory P. Psychological characteristics and the effectiveness of patient-controlled analgesia. Br J Anaesth 1995; 74: 271–6.
Yang JC, Clark WC, Tsui SL, Ng KF, Clark SB. Preoperative Multidimensional Affect and Pain Survey (MAPS) scores predict postcolectomy analgesia requirement. Clin J Pain 2000; 16: 314–20.
Katz J, Cohen L, Schmid R, Chan VW, Wowk A. Postoperative morphine use and hyperalgesia are reduced by preoperative but not intraoperative epidural analgesia: implications for preemptive analgesia and the prevention of central sensitization. Anesthesiology 2003; 98: 1449–60.
Ware JE, Johnston SA, Davies-Avery A, Brook RH. Conceptualization and measurement of health for adults in the Health Insurance Study (Mental Health R-1987/3-HEW). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 1994.
Weinstein MC, Berwick DM, Goldman PA, Murphy JM, Barsky AJ. A comparison of three psychiatric screening tests using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. Med Care 1989; 27: 593–607.
Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W. Impact of event scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med 1979; 41: 209–18.
Zakowski SG, McAllister CG, Deal M, Baum A. Stress, reactivity, and immune function in healthy men. Health Psychol 1992; 11: 223–32.
Zakowski SG, Cohen L, Hall MH, Wollman K, Baum A. Differential effects of active and passive laboratory stressors on immune function in healthy men. Int J Behav Med 1994; 1: 163–84.
Bentler PM, Bonnett DG. Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull 1980; 88: 588–606.
Salmon P, Hall GM. PCA: patient-controlled analgesia or politically correct analgesia? Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 815–8.
Griffin MJ, Brennan L, McShane AJ. Preoperative education and outcome of patient controlled analgesia. Can J Anaesth 1998; 45: 943–8.
Leeuw M, Goossens ME, Linton SJ, Crombez G, Boersma K, Vlaeyen JW. The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: current state of scientific evidence. J Behav Med 2007; 30: 77–94.
Turk DC. A diathesis-stress model of chronic pain and disability following traumatic injury. Pain Res Manag 2002; 7: 9–19.
Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders AM, Boeren RG, van Eek H. Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Pain 1995; 62: 363–72.
Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJ. A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain 1993; 52: 157–68.
Roth ML, Tripp DA, Harrison MH, Sullivan M, Carson P. Demographic and psychosocial predictors of acute perioperative pain for total knee arthroplasty. Pain Res Manag 2007; 12: 185–94.
Pavlin DJ, Sullivan MJ, Freund PR, Roesen K. Catastrophizing: a risk factor for postsurgical pain. Clin J Pain 2005; 21: 83–90.
Philips HC. The effects of behavioural treatment on chronic pain. Behav Res Ther 1987; 25: 365–77.
Boersma K, Linton S, Overmeer T, Jansson M, Vlaeyen J, de Jong J. Lowering fear-avoidance and enhancing function through exposure in vivo. A multiple baseline study across six patients with back pain. Pain 2004; 108: 8–16.
Vlaeyen JW, de Jong J, Geilen M, Heuts PH, van Breukelen G. The treatment of fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain: further evidence on the effectiveness of exposure in vivo. Clin J Pain 2002; 18: 251–61.
Woods MP, Asmundson GJ. Evaluating the efficacy of graded in vivo exposure for the treatment of fear in patients with chronic back pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Pain 2007; doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.06.037.
Brennan FX, Beck KD, Servatius RJ. Leverpress escape/avoidance conditioning in rats: safety signal length and avoidance performance. Integr Physiol Behav Sci 2003; 38: 36–44.
Wiertelak EP, Maier SF, Watkins LR. Cholecystokinin antianalgesia: safety cues abolish morphine analgesia. Science 1992; 256: 830–3.
Wiertelak EP, Watkins LR, Maier SF. Conditioned inhibition of analgesia. Anim Learn Behav 1992; 20: 339–49.
Hebb AL, Poulin JF, Roach SP, Zacharko RM, Drolet G. Cholecystokinin and endogenous opioid peptides: interactive influence on pain, cognition, and emotion. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2005; 29: 1225–38.
Benedetti F, Amanzio M, Casadio C, Oliaro A, Maggi G. Blockade of nocebo hyperalgesia by the cholecystokinin antagonist proglumide. Pain 1997; 71: 135–40.
Benedetti F, Lanotte M, Lopiano L, Colloca L. When words are painful: unraveling the mechanisms of the nocebo effect. Neuroscience 2007; 147: 260–71.
Benedetti F, Amanzio M, Vighetti S, Asteggiano G. The biochemical and neuroendocrine bases of the hyperalgesic nocebo effect. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 12014–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Work conducted at the Acute Pain Research Unit, Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Supported by grant NS35480 from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; MOP-37845 from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Ontario, Canada; and a CIHR Canada Research Chair in Health Psychology to Joel Katz. Presented in part at the 2nd Joint Scientific Meeting of the American Pain Society and the Canadian Pain Society, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (May 6–9, 2004) and the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (July 16–20, 2006).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Katz, J., Buis, T. & Cohen, L. Locked out and still knocking: predictors of excessive demands for postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Can J Anesth 55, 88–99 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03016320
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03016320