Abstract
In this paper, we study the dynamic evolution of chaotic and oscillatory waves arising from dissipative dynamical systems of elliptic and parabolic types of partial differential equations. In such a system, the classical second-order partial derivatives are modeled with the Riesz fractional-order operator in one and two dimensions. We employ both finite difference schemes and the Fourier spectral methods for the approximation of fractional derivatives. We examined the accuracy of the schemes by reporting their convergence results. These numerical techniques are applied to solve two practical problems that are of current and recurring interests, namely the fractional multi-wing chaotic system and fractional Helmholtz equation in one and two spatial dimensions. In the computational experiments, it was observed that under certain conditions, nonlinear dynamical system which depends on some variables is able to produce the so-called chaotic patterns. The present example shows a sensitive dependence on the choice of parameters and initial conditions. Some numerical results are presented for different instances of fractional power.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Nonlinear chaotic models are dynamical systems that are widely celebrated in the literature due to their useful applications in many areas of applied sciences and engineering. Based on chaotic system, an increasing number of research papers has been published over the years, for instance, the chaotic circuit based on memristor [63], Chen and Ueta’s system [11], Lorenz’s system [28], simple chaotic flows [52], Rössler’s system [47], memristive chaotic model with bird- and heart-shaped attractors [5, 62], CMOS transistor oscillators [43], digital and circuit realization of chaotic systems [30], analog digital designs [44], chaotic mythical bird system [5], butterfly wings and paradise bird map model [1].
Nowadays, oscillatory and complex chaotic processes have been used for theoretical, practical or experimental purposes in different application areas, which include the pathological image encryption [26], chaotic communication [12], image watermarking [61], chaotic video communication scheme via WAN remote transmission [25] autonomous mobile robots [58], control and synchronization [45], audio and image encryption effects [27, 32] and electromechanical oscillators [10], among several others.
Over the last few decades the concept of fractional calculus (which involves the extension of standard differentiation and integration to fractional cases) has become a strong tool for describing the dynamics of complex scenarios which appear most often in virtually all application field of engineering and sciences. Fractional differentiation and their methods of solution have a lot of applications in the areas of physics, electrochemistry, control theory, finance and economics, electrical circuits, robotics, viscoelasticity, ecology, biology and other physical systems [7, 36, 37, 41]. Majority of the work reported on the dynamics of chaotic systems which attract a great attention of researchers are either based on integer-order or fractional-order ordinary differential equations.
Recently, the study of fractional differential equations such as the fractional wave and diffusion equations [41], control systems [49], biological systems, ecological and chemical systems, chaotic systems [36, 39, 40], subdiffusion and superdiffusion processes [35], finance, electrical problems, viscoelasticity theory [49] and bioengineering [29] has been arisen in many applications of the applied sciences, engineering and technology. Over the years, the concept of fractional calculus which is the generalization of the classical integration and differentiation to fractional-order derivatives and integrals has been applied and used to model many physical and real-life phenomena in physics, biology, groundwater and economics [23].
In real sense, partial differential equations (PDEs) have been used to describe a wide variety of phenomena such as diffusion, electrostatics, sound, fluid dynamics, heat, electrodynamics, elasticity, gravitation and quantum mechanics. Most of these models that are governed by PDE combine low-order nonlinear with higher-order linear terms. For instance, the time-dependent models such as Allen–Cahn, Fisher–KPP, Gray–Scott, KdV, Navier–Stokes, Schroödinger, Bugers, Burger–Huxley, Hodgkin–Huxley, Cahn–Hilliard, FitzHugh–Nagumo and nonlinear KiSS equations, among several others. It is desirable to utilize higher-order approximations in both time and space, in order to obtain accurate numerical results. Due to some computational challenges imposed as by the combination of nonlinearity and stiffness which lead many authors to restrict their computational to second-order schemes in time, we are motivated in this work with the formulation of higher-order numerical schemes which are capable of handling both elliptic and parabolic types of fractional partial differential equations (FPDEs).
In this work, we shall consider the solution of a time-dependent reaction–diffusion equation of the form
where \(\varvec{w}\) is the species concentrations or densities, \({\mathcal {L}}\) is the linear or nonlinear (stiff) fractional operator of order \(\alpha \in (1,2]\), which requires a fast solver to formulate into higher dimensions, and \(\mathcal {N}\) denotes nonlinear (nonstiff or mildly stiff) operator which accounts for all the local kinetics in the equation. Equations of the form (1.1) have been solved using different numerical methods, such as the implicit–explicit (IMEX) schemes [3, 4, 24, 48], finite difference methods [31, 53, 56], finite element [9, 46] and spectral algorithms [8, 38].
Here, in one dimension, we define the Riesz fractional derivative of order \(\alpha \in (1,2]\), as
where
The terms \(_0D_x^\alpha \) and \(_xD_L^\alpha \) are expressed as the left- and right-hand side of the Riemann–Liouville fractional derivatives. The fractional reaction–diffusion model described in (1.1) has a lot of physical meaning and applications; see [41, 65] for details. The aim of the present work is to explore the dynamic richness in chaotic and oscillatory fractional diffusive models of either parabolic or elliptic type of PDEs, and to seek appropriate numerical techniques of arriving at solution.
The remainder part of this paper is organized into sections as follows. In Sect. 2, we give detailed definitions, theorems and some useful results for subdifussive and superdiffusive cases of the fractional operator. In Sect. 3, we introduced some numerical schemes based on the finite difference and spectral methods for the approximation of the Riesz fractional derivatives. The accuracy, applicability and suitability of the proposed schemes are tested on some practical problems taken from the literature in Sect. 4. We conclude with the last section.
2 Preliminaries on Riesz fractional operator
We begin this section with a quick tour of some useful definitions and theorem used for subdiffusion \((0<\alpha \le 1)\) and superdiffusion \((1<\alpha \le 2)\) cases in one component [35].
Definition 2.1
[41, 51, 64] The Riesz fractional derivative for \(\alpha \in (n-1, n]\) defined on interval \(x\in (0,L]\) is given by
where
Theorem 2.2
For a continuous function w(x) defined on \(-\infty< x<\infty \), the following inequality is satisfied.
Proof
By following [35, 51], the fractional Laplacian operator is defined as
where \(\mathscr {F}\) represents the Fourier transform, and \(\mathscr {F}^{-1}\) denotes the inverse Fourier transform of function w(x), so that
In the function, w(x) vanishes at \(x=\pm \infty \), by applying integration by parts
which implies that
For simplicity, we denote
so that
Bear in mind that
and for case \(0<\alpha <1\), we get
By applying the known result \(\Gamma (\alpha )\Gamma (1-\alpha )=\pi /\sin \pi \alpha \) and \(i^{\alpha -1}+(-i)^{\alpha -1}=2\sin \left( \frac{\pi \alpha }{2}\right) \), we get
Therefore, for subdiffusion interval \(0<\alpha <1\),
According to Podlubny [41], the Grünwald–Letnikov fractional operator of order \(\alpha \in (0,1]\) in [a, x] is defined by
If \(a\rightarrow -\infty \), we have
In the same manner, if \(u(x)\rightarrow 0\) for \(b\rightarrow \infty \), we obtain
Therefore, since w(x) is integrable and continuous for \(x\ge a\) for all \(\alpha \in (0,1)\), then the Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative is the same as the Grünwald–Letnikov fractional operator. Hence, for all \(\alpha \in (0,1)\), we say
where
Again, we consider the superdiffusive case we follow a similar derivation in the interval \(\alpha \in (1,2]\). We assume that the function w(x) and its derivative \(w'(x)\) both vanish as \(x\rightarrow \pm \infty \). And by integration by parts, we have
so that
We assume
then
Also bear in mind that
we obtain
By applying \(\Gamma (\alpha -1)\Gamma (2-\alpha )=\pi /\sin \pi (\alpha -1) =-\pi /\sin (\pi \alpha )\) and \(i^{\alpha -1}+(-i)^{\alpha -1}=2\sin \left( \frac{\pi \alpha }{2}\right) \), we get
Hence, for superdiffusion case \(1<\alpha <2\),
According to Podlubny [41], the Grünwald–Letnikov fractional operator for superdiffusive order \(\alpha \in (1,2]\) in [a, x] is defined by
So, if w(x) and \(w'(x)\) both tend to zero as \(a\rightarrow -\infty \), we have
Also, if \(w(x),w'(x)\rightarrow 0\) for \(b\rightarrow \infty \), we obtain
If both w(x) and \(w'(x)\) are integrable and continuous for \(x\ge a\), then Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative coincides with the Grünwald–Letnikov operator. Hence, for superdiffusive process we have
where
Finally, if \(n-1<\alpha <n\) then
where
3 Approximation techniques
In this segment, we use results of definition2.1 and Theorem 2.2 and give numerical approximation to the following Riesz fractional diffusion equation [19, 20, 55, 64, 66]
subject to initial and boundary conditions
where \(\delta >0\) is the diffusion coefficient, and both functions w(x, t) are real-valued.
The Riesz fractional derivative of order \(1<\alpha \le 2\) is given by the left- and right-hand Grünwald-Letnikov (GL) fractional operator on finite interval [0, L] as
It should be noted that the infinite space domain \((-\infty ,\infty )\) as discussed in the above section is now truncated with the finite case [0, L]. The space \(L>0\) should be adjusted in the computation to ensure that there is enough space for waves to propagate. By following [19, 41, 64], the mesh is N equal intervals of \(h=L/N\), \(x_s=sh\) for \(0\le s\le N\). Next we approximate (3.9) term by term. Beginning with the right-hand side, we approximate the second term by
Also, we approximate the third term by
By adding Eqs. (3.10) and (3.11), we obtain the numerical approximation for the left-hand side of fractional operator in (3.9) as follows
In a similar fashion, we formulate an approximation for the right-hand operator in (3.9) as
Finally, by using the GL definitions in (3.9) in conjunction with left- and right- approximations (3.12) and (3.13), the time fractional-in-space diffusion Eq. (3.7) is transformed to system of fractional ODEs
We denote (3.14) as finite difference (FD) scheme.
The second method we utilize in this work is based on the Fourier spectral method. According to Illć et al. [19, 20], the power \((-\Delta )^{\alpha /2}\) of the Laplacian operator \((-\Delta )\), in a domain \(\Omega \) with zero Neumann or Dirichlet boundary conditions, is defined via the spectral decomposition of the eigenvalues of the original operator. Denote \((\varphi _{j} , \lambda _{j})\) as respective eigenfunctions and eigenvectors of operator \((-\Delta )\) in \(\Omega \) with zero Neumann or Dirichlet boundary conditions. It implies that \((\varphi _{j} , \lambda _{j}^{\alpha /2})\) are the eigenfunctions and eigenvectors of \((-\Delta )^{\alpha /2}\), subject to the Neumann or Dirichlet boundary conditions.
Obviously, the fractional Laplacian operator \((-\Delta )^{\alpha /2}\) is well defined in the space of functions
where
Hence, for any \(w\in H_{0}^{\alpha /2}\), the Laplacian \((-\Delta )^{\alpha /2}\) is defined by
where \(\varphi _{j}\) and \(\lambda _{j}\) depend on any boundary condition as specified.
The homogeneous Neumann and Dirichlet boundary condition are given as
and
respectively. The approach illustrated the above results in a full diagonal representation of the fractional operator, and it achieves spectral convergence regardless of the chosen value of fractional power \(\alpha \). Another advantage of the spectral method is that it is easy to adapt and extend to high dimensions.
In practice, we use the MATLAB fast Fourier transform (fft) to transform the general fractional-in-space reaction–diffusion equation of the form
which leads to two-dimensional representation in the Fourier space as
where W is the double Fourier transform of w(x, y, t), that is,
We let
so as to explicitly remove the linear pieces of the transformed equations, and set
so that we now obtain
At this junction, in practice, we have discretized the spatial domain, using the equispaced points in the directions of x and y. Apply the discrete fft so that (3.23) becomes a system of ODEs represented by the Fourier modes
where \(w_{i,j}=w(x_i,y_j)\) and \(\Omega ^{\alpha /2}_{i,j}=\left( \chi _x^2(i)\right) ^{\alpha /2}+\left( \chi _y^2(j)\right) ^{\alpha /2}\). In the computation, the boundary conditions are now mounted at extremes of the domain. Since the PDE has been transformed to an ODEs, any explicit solver can be employed to integrate in time. Specifically here, we utilize the improved version of the fourth-order exponential time differencing Runge–Kutta (ETD4RK) [22] given by
with the stages \(\chi _i\) given as
with functions \(\zeta _{1,2,3}\) defined as
which coincide with the terms in the Munthe-Kaas [34] Lie group methods; see [22] for details.
In what follows, we demonstrate the applicability and accuracy of the numerical schemes by considering the one-dimensional fractional-in-space diffusion Eq. (3.7) on \(0<x<\pi \) subject to initial and boundary conditions \(w(x,0)=\beta (x)=x^2(\pi -x)\) and \(w(0,t)=w(\pi ,t)=0\), respectively. Talking of the classical case, when \(\alpha =2\), \(\delta =0.25\) and \(_0\mathcal {D}_x^\alpha =-(-\Delta )^{\alpha /2}\), the exact solution is calculated as
With \(\alpha \ne 2\), the exact equation is given as
It should be mentioned that we obtain the classical result when \(\alpha =2\). We illustrate the convergence of the schemes as shown in Figs. 1 and 2 for some instances of \(\alpha \). It is obvious that the spectral method has better accuracy.
4 Applications to models in physics and engineering
The methods we described above are capable of solving higher-dimensional problems and further coupled reaction–diffusion systems; however, we shall restrict our study to consider one and two space dimensions of two different PDEs that abound in mathematical physics, biology, chemistry and ecology, and many intriguing mathematical phenomena and patterns that may naturally arise.
4.1 Fractional chaotic model
Chaos theory is an aspect of mathematics that focuses on the study of chaos states of dynamical problems which have some irregular behaviors that are highly sensitive to initial conditions. Chaotic phenomena occurs in many natural and physical systems, such as fluid flow, weather and climate, heartbeat irregularities, road traffic and stock market, among several others [21, 28, 50]. Chaotic behavior can be studied via the analysis of a chaotic mathematical model. Chaos theory has many applications in various disciplines, like physics, engineering, meteorology, sociology, anthropology, environmental science, computer science, economics and finance, biology, pandemic crisis management, medicine, ecology and security in communication technology.
Over the years, a reasonable number of research work has been published based on the study and application of chaotic systems, for instance, the Lorenz system [28], Rössler system [47], Chen and Ueta system [11], and other applications such as simple chaotic flows [52], MOS transistor-based oscillators, heart-shaped memristive and memristor chaotic attractors [62, 63], digital realization of chaotic system, transition to turbulence in incompressible fluid flows [14, 15] and electromechanical oscillator [68]. Complexity of chaotic systems has been applied in different engineering applications ranging from asymmetric color pathological image encryption [26], to control and synchronization [45] and so many others that are classified in [6].
Standing on the success and useful applications of chaotic processes as widely reported, we consider a three-species chaotic fractional-in-space system
subject to initial and boundary conditions
where \(u, v,w\mathbf {R}^n\) represent a group of physical or biological species, \(\delta _i\in \mathbf {R}^{n\times n},\;i=1,2,3\) is the diffusion coefficient matrix, \(\Delta ^\alpha \) is the fractional Laplacian operator of order \(\alpha \in (1, 2]\) associated with the diffusion of the species u, v and w, \(\Omega =\{0<x\le L, 0<y\le L \}\) for \(L\gg 0\), and \(\varvec{n}\) is the outward unit normal of vector of the boundary \(\partial \Omega \). Then, \(f_i(u,v,w)\) for \(i=1,2,3\) are nonlinear functions of u, v and w which describe the chemical or biological reactions, given here as
The system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs), that is, the spatially homogeneous form of system (4.27) with kinetic (4.29), has been investigated [59, 60]. The corresponding ODE system is sometimes referred to as the three-dimensional four-wing chaotic model
where u(t), v(t) and w(t) are state variables given as functions of time only, \(\phi _1,\phi _2\), \(\varphi _2\) and \(\psi _2\in {\mathbb {R}}\), \(\varphi _1>0\) and \(\psi _1<0\) are real all real numbers. If model (4.30) is dissipative, then the sum \(\left( \frac{\partial u'}{u}+\frac{\partial v'}{v}+\frac{\partial w'}{w}=\phi _1+\varphi _2+\psi _2=\mathfrak {V}\right) <0\). This means that \(\mathfrak {V}_0\) which represent the volume element is contracted into \(\mathfrak {V}_0\exp (\phi _1+\varphi _2+\psi _2)\) by the flow at time t. In what follows, we give a quick tour of the local dynamics of the reaction–diffusion system. This gives conditions on the choice of parameters necessary for the solution to have physically or biologically meaningful equilibria, and it will also help in making the choice of parameters when numerically dealing with the solutions of the full fractional reaction–diffusion model.
To derive the equilibrium points of the autonomous model (4.30), we require to set \(f_i(u,v,w)=0\), which implies that \(u'(t)=0, v'(t)=0\) and \(w'(t)=0\). The points \(E_0=(0,0,0)\) is trivial which corresponds to the washout of the species. We are only interested in the coexistence of the three components.
With conditions \(\frac{\phi _1\psi _2}{\varphi _1\psi _1}>0\), the discriminant \(\phi _2^2\varphi _1^2-4\phi _1\varphi _1\varphi _2>0\) and \(\varphi _1\ne 0\), we obtain the following nontrivial states
where
where \(\text {sign}(\cdot )\) denotes a sign function. So, by linearizing (4.30) at point \(E_0\), we have the Jacobian
Obviously, the eigenvalues of matrix \(A({E_0})\) correspond to
With these findings, we can remark that since \(\phi _1,\varphi _2,\psi _2\) are all real numbers, then there is no imaginary eigenvalue arising from matrix \(A(E_0)\), and near the state \(E_0=(0,0,0)\), there is no Hopf bifurcation. It is important to note that the states \(E_1^*\) and \(E_2^*\) are symmetric in nature with respect to the w direction and same is applicable to the points \(E_3^*\) and \(E_4^*\). The corresponding Jacobian at points \(E_i^*,i=1,\dots ,4\), as
and
Since the pairs of matrices are symmetric, and from the Jacobian matrices in (4.34) and (4.35), we have the transformation \(\mathbf{B}\), in such that
where \(\mathbf{B}=\text {diag}(-1, -1,1)\) and \(\mathbf{B}\) represents the orthogonal matrix for \(\mathbf{B}^{-1}=\mathbf{B}^T=\mathbf{B}\). If we set \(Z_i=[z_{i1},z_{i2},z_{i3}]\) be matrix which consists the eigenvectors of \(E_i^*,\) for \(i=1,2,3,4\), we obtain
Therefore, it is obvious that \(E_1^*,E_2^*\) and \(E_3^*,E_4^*\) are two distinct states, and each pair of the equilibrium state is locally stable, unstable and center manifolds. When \(\phi _1=0.2, \phi _2=-0.01,\varphi _1=1,\varphi _2=-0.4,\psi _1=-1\) and \(\psi _2=-1\). The equilibrium states are calculated as \(E_1=(-0.62,0.45,0.28), E_2=(0.62,-0.45,0.28), E_3=(0.64,0.45,-0.29)\) and \(E_4=(0.62,-0.45,-0.29)\).
Since the sum \(\frac{\partial u'}{u}+\frac{\partial v'}{v}+\frac{\partial w'}{w}=\phi _1+\varphi _2+\psi _2=-1.2<0\), it implies that system (4.30) is dissipative. To examine the stability of the equilibrium states \(E_0,E_1,\ldots ,E_4\), we require to consider the Jacobian matrix at all the equilibrium points and find all their eigenvalues. These results are calculated as
We can deduce based on the above eigenvalues that the equilibria of model (4.30) are saddle and unstable.
The Lyapunov exponent measures the degree of sensitivity to initial conditions that is, local instability in a state space. Such local instability can evolve for a variety of reasons in different types of systems [17]. Lyapunov exponents have proved useful in various contexts. For instance, within the dynamical system, it gives a detailed characterization of chaotic dynamics and can assist to achieve various forms of synchronization. With parameters \(\phi _1=0.25, \phi _2=0.05,\varphi _1=1.2,\varphi _2=-0.2,\psi _1=-1\), \(\psi _2=-1\) and \((u_0,v_0,w_0)=(2,1,2)\), the Lyapunov exponents (LEs) for different time levels are calculated as
and the corresponding graphical representation of the Lyapunov exponents for \(t=200\) and \(t=1000\) is shown in Fig. 3. Since the sum of the Lyapunov exponents at any time t here is negative, it implies that system (4.30) is dissipative, and the fractional dimension for \(t=200\) is 2.05, which leads the dynamical system with attractors as shown in Figs. 4 and 5. Figure 6 shows time series results for different instances of \(\phi _1\) as given in the figure caption. With \(\phi _2=0\), it should be noted that model (4.30) cannot leads to a desired chaotic attractor, causing the number of scroll wings to reduce from four to two. Also, if at any point we have at least two of the Lyapunov exponents to be positive maybe due to the perturbation of the initial data, then the system is hyper-chaotic.
In one dimension, we experiment fractional model (4.27) with kinetics (4.29) using the zero-flux boundary conditions and random initial data emanating from small perturbation of the steady state, which we compute as
for \(N=200\), The parameters are taken as
Figures 7 and 8 show one-dimensional chaotic oscillations for \(\alpha =1.55\) and \(\alpha =1.92\), respectively.
In two dimensions, we solve system (4.27) using the zero-flux boundary conditions with two different initial functions. We employ both the MATLAB random data
and smooth initial functions
where \((u^*,v^*,w^*)=(0.5,0.25,0.25)\), \(\gamma =0.8\) and \(\nu =0.05\) to obtain the distributions in Figs. 9 and 10, respectively. The effect of initial functions is justified here for some \(\alpha \).
4.2 Fractional Helmholtz equation
Helmholtz equation is known to be the variation of the Poisson equation. Helmholtz equation or reduced wave equation belongs to a family of an elliptic type of partial differential equation with broad utility in mechanical engineering and theoretical physics, whose derivation can be drawn directly from the known wave equation. It arises, for instance, to describe the potential field caused by a given charge or mass density distribution; with the potential field known, one can then calculate gravitational or electrostatic field. It is a generalization of Laplace’s equation, which is also frequently seen in physics.
In this work, we consider on Cartesian coordinate the two- or three-dimensional nonhomogeneous isotropic medium whose wave speed is denoted by c. The corresponding wave solution to harmonic source f(x, y) is u(x, y), vibrating at frequency \(\omega >0\) satisfying the scalar fractional Helmholtz equation defined on region \(\mathbf {R}\) by
where u is a sufficiently differentiable function on the boundary \(\partial \Omega \), n is the outward unit normal to the boundary, \(\kappa >0\) is a wave number, and \(\sqrt{\kappa }=\omega /c \) denotes the wave number with wavelength \(2\pi /\sqrt{\kappa }\). \(\Delta ^\alpha \) is usual fractional Laplacian operator of order \(1<\alpha \le 2\) in two \(\Delta ^\alpha u=\left( \frac{\partial ^\alpha u}{\partial x^\alpha }+\frac{\partial ^\alpha u}{\partial y^\alpha }\right) \) or three dimensions \(\Delta ^\alpha u=\left( \frac{\partial ^\alpha u}{\partial x^\alpha }+\frac{\partial ^\alpha u}{\partial y^\alpha }+\frac{\partial ^\alpha u}{\partial z^\alpha }\right) \).
Helmholtz equation has application in Physics problem-solving concepts like seismology, acoustics and electromagnetic radiation. Seismology: The scientific study of earthquake and its propagating elastic waves is known as seismology, electrodynamics, most especially in optics and acoustics involving time harmonic wave distribution. Other study areas are the volcanic eruptions due to seismic source and tsunamis as a result of environmental effects. If the plus (+) sign before the term \(\kappa \) is changed to minus (−) sign, then the Helmholtz equation can be used to describe the mass transfer processes with volume chemical reactions of first order [42]. It should be mentioned that whenever the wave number \(\kappa \gg 1\), the solution of (4.40) becomes highly oscillatory which makes it very challenging to design an effective numerical algorithm to solve the Helmholtz equation in higher dimensions. A lot of numerical methods based on the finite difference approximations [13, 67], Adomian decomposition method [16], reduced differential transform method [2], homotopy perturbation method [18] and finite elements and Galerkin methods [33, 57] have been reported in the literature.
To experiment (4.40) in two dimensions, we set \(f(x,y)=\exp (-10(y-1)^2+(x-0.5)^2)\) and utilize a square domain size \(x,y\in [-L,L]\times [-L,L]\) for \(L=1\). The wave evolution showing chaotic oscillations is displayed in Figs. 11 and 12 for different values of fractional-order \(\alpha \in (1,2]\) and \(\kappa \gg 1\). It should be noted that when \(\kappa =0\), the Helmholtz equation (4.40) reduces to the Poisson. When \(\kappa <4\), we get a stationary (pattern) solution.
5 Conclusion
Numerical solution of fractional-in-space advection or reaction equations in two and higher dimensions has been the major setback some researchers are facing, most simulations that are based on conventional ideas are time consuming. As a result, the majority of work reported is restricted to one-dimensional case problems of PDEs. The aim of the present work is to report a good, clear, working versatile technique based on both finite difference and spectral methods to explore the dynamic richness of chaotic and oscillatory waves models. We realized that the spectral scheme avoids the issue of stiffness, and they can be applied and built upon by other scientists and engineers. This technique is used to explore the dynamic richness of chaotic systems and the Helmholtz equation in one and two dimensions. The methods reported in this work can be extended higher dimensions and more coupled practical problems in physics and engineering.
References
R. Abraham, Y. Ueda, The Chaos Avant-Garde: Memories of the Early Days of Chaos Theory (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000)
S. Abuasad, K. Moaddy, I. Hashim, J. King Saud. Univ. Sci. 31, 659–666 (2018)
U.M. Ascher, S.J. Ruth, B.T.R. Wetton, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 32, 797–823 (1995)
U.M. Ascher, S.J. Ruth, R.J. Spiteri, Appl. Numer. Math. 25, 151–167 (1997)
L.F. Avalos-Ruiz, J.F. Gomez-Aguilar, A. Atangana, K.M. Owolabi, On the dynamics of fractional maps with power-law, exponential decay and Mittag–Leffler memory. Chaos Solitons Fractals 127, 364–388 (2019)
A.T. Azar et al., Complexity 2017(7871467), 1–11 (2017)
D. Baleanu, K. Diethelm, E. Scalas, J. Trujillo, Fractional Calculus Models and Numerical Methods (World Scientific, Singapore, 2009)
A. Bueno-Orovio, D. Kay, K. Burrage, BIT 54, 937–954 (2014)
K. Burrage, N. Hale, D. Kay, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 34, A2145–A2172 (2012)
A. Buscarino, C. Famoso, L. Fortuna, M. Frasca, A new chaotic electro-mechanical oscillator. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 26, 1650161 (2016)
G. Chen, T. Ueta, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 9, 1465–1466 (1999)
S. Cicek, A. Ferikoglu, I. Pehlivan, A new 3D chaotic system: dynamical analysis, electronic circuit design, active control synchronization and chaotic masking communication application. Optik Int. J. Light Electron. Opt. 127, 4024–4030 (2016)
I. Danaila, P. Joly, S.M. Kaber, M. Postel, An Introduction to Scientific Computing (Springer, New York, 2007)
E.F. Doungmo Goufo, Chaos 26, 084305 (2016)
E.F. Doungmo Goufo, J.J. Nieto, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 339, 329–342 (2018)
S.M. El-Sayed, D. Kaya, Appl. Math. Comput. 150, 763–773 (2004)
F. Ginelli, P. Poggi, A. Turchi, H. Chate, R. Livi, A. Politi, Characterizing dynamics with covariant Lyapunov vectors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 130601 (2007)
P.K. Gupta, A. Yildirim, K. Rai, Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow 22, 424–435 (2012)
M. Ilić, F. Liu, I. Turner, V. Anh, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 8, 323–341 (2005)
M. Ilić, F. Liu, I. Turner, V. Anh, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 9, 333–349 (2006)
V.G. Ivancevic, T.I. Tijana, Complex Nonlinearity: Chaos, Phase Transitions, Topology Change, and Path Integrals (Springer, Berlin, 2008)
A.K. Kassam, L.N. Trefethen, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 26, 1214–1233 (2005)
A.A. Kilbas, H.M. Srivastava, J.J. Trujillo, Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006)
D. Li, C. Zhang, W. Wang, Y. Zhang, Appl. Math. Model. 35, 2711–2722 (2011)
Z. Lin, S. Yu, C. Li, J. Lu, Q. Wang, Design and smartphone-based implementation of a chaotic video communication scheme via WAN remote transmission. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 26, 1650158 (2016)
H. Liu, A. Kadir, Y. Li, Optik 127, 5812–5819 (2016)
H. Liu, A. Kadir, Y. Li, Audio encryption scheme by confusion and diffusion based on multi-scroll chaotic system and one-time keys. Optik 127, 7431–7438 (2016)
E.N. Lorenz, Int. J. Atmos. Sci. 20, 130–141 (1963)
R.L. Magin, Fractional Calculus in Bioengineering (Begell House Publisher Inc, Connecticut, 2006)
A.S. Mansingka, M. Affan Zidan, M.L. Barakat, A.G. Radwan, K.N. Salama, Fully digital jerk-based chaotic oscillators for high throughput pseudo-random number generators up to 8.77 Gbits/s. Microelectron. J. 44, 744–752 (2013)
M.M. Meerschaert, C. Tadjeran, Appl. Numer. Math. 56, 80–90 (2006)
L. Min, X. Yang, G. Chen, D. Wang, Some polynomial chaotic maps without equilibria and an application to image encryption with avalanche effects. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 25, 1550124 (2015)
L. Mu, J. Wang, X. Ye, IMA J. Numer. Anal. 35, 1228–1255 (2015)
H. Munthe-Kaas, Appl. Numer. Math. 29, 115–127 (1999)
K.M. Owolabi, A. Atangana, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 131, 335 (2016)
K.M. Owolabi, A. Atangana, Chaos Solitons Fract. 115, 362–370 (2018)
K.M. Owolabi, A. Atangana, Numerical Methods for Fractional Differentiation (Springer, Singapore, 2019)
K.M. Owolabi, Chaos Solitons Fract. 34, 109723 (2020)
K.M. Owolabi, Numerical approach to chaotic pattern formation in diffusive predator–prey system with Caputo fractional operator 1–21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/num.22522
K.M. Owolabi, J.F. Gómez-Aguilar, G. Fernández-Anaya, J.E. Lavín-Delgado, E. Hernández-Castillo, Modelling of Chaotic processes with Caputo fractional order derivative. Entropy 22, 1027 (2020)
I. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations (Academic press, New York, 1999)
A.D. Polyanin, V.E. Nazaikinskii, Handbook of Linear Partial Differential Equations for Engineers and Scientists (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2015)
A.G. Radwan, A.M. Soliman, A.-L. El-Sedeek, An inductorless CMOS realization of Chua’s circuit. Chaos Solitons Fract. 18, 149–158 (2003)
A.G. Radwan, A.M. Soliman, A.S. Elwakil, 1-D digitally controlled multiscroll chaos generator. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 17, 227–242 (2007)
A.G. Radwan, K. Moaddy, K.N. Salama, S. Momani, I. Hashim, J. Adv. Res. 5, 125–132 (2014)
J. Roop, J. Comput, Appl. Math. 193, 243–268 (2005)
O. Rössler, Phys. Lett. A 57, 397–398 (1976)
S. Ruuth, J. Math. Biol. 34, 148–176 (1995)
J. Sabatier, O.P. Agrawal, J.A.T. Machado, Advances in Fractional Calculus: Theoretical Developments and Applications in Physics and Engineering (Springer, Netherlands, 2007)
L.A. Safonov, E. Tomer, V.V. Strygin, Y. Ashkenazy, S. Havlin, Chaos 12, 1006–1014 (2002)
S.G. Samko, A.A. Kilbas, O.I. Marichev, Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Applications (Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam, 1993)
J.C. Sprott, Elegant Chaos Algebraically Simple Chaotic Flows (World Scientific, Singapore, 2010)
J.C. Strikwerda, Partial Difference Schemes and Partial Differential Equations (SIAM, Philadelphia, 2004)
S.H. Strogatz, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos with Applications to Physics, Chemistry and Engineering (Perseus Books, Massachusetts, USA, 1994)
V.E. Tarasov, Nonlinear Dyn. 86, 1745–1759 (2016)
J.W. Thomas, Numerical Partial Differential Equations Numerical Partial Differential Equations—Finite Difference Methods (Springer, New York, 1995)
L.L. Thompson, P.M. Pinsky, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 38, 371–397 (1995)
C.K. Volos, I.M. Kyprianidis, I.N. Stouboulos, A chaotic path planning generator for autonomous mobile Robots. Robot Auton. Syst. 60, 651–656 (2012)
Z. Wang, Y. Sun, B.J. van Wyk, G. Qi, M.A. van Wyk, Braz. J. Phys. 39, 547–553 (2009)
Z. Wang, G. Qi, Y. Sun, B.J. van Wyk, M.A. van Wyk, Nonlinear Dyn. 60, 443–457 (2010)
B. Wang, S. Zhou, X. Zheng et al., Image watermarking using chaotic map and DNA coding. Optik Int. J. Light Electron. Opt. 126, 4846–4851 (2015)
J. Wu, L. Wang, G. Chen, S. Duan, Chaos Solitons Fract. 92, 20–29 (2016)
R. Wu, C. Wang, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 26(1650145), 1–11 (2016)
Q. Yang, F. Liu, I. Turner, Appl. Math. Model. 34, 200–218 (2010)
G.M. Zaslavsky, Phys. Rep. 371, 461–580 (2002)
F. Zeng, F. Liu, C. Li, K. Burrage, I. Turner, V. Anh, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 52, 2599–2622 (2014)
W. Zhang, Y. Dai, JAMP 1, 18–24 (2013)
M.A. Zidan, A.G. Radwan, K.N. Salama, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 22, 1250143 (2012)
Acknowledgements
We are very grateful to the Managing Editor, Prof. S. Banerjee and anonymous referees for their careful reading and valuable comments, which help to improve this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author has no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Owolabi, K.M. Computational techniques for highly oscillatory and chaotic wave problems with fractional-order operator. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135, 864 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00873-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00873-z