Abstract
Recently, different carbon nanomaterials were introduced for construction of electrochemical sensors. In this study, the influence of carbon nanomaterial on performance of carbon paste potentiometric electrode was investigated. In this manner, different kinds of carbon nanomaterial, i.e., graphene, graphene oxide and carbon nanotube (CNT) were used as a conduction phase in carbon paste electrode. Then, potentiometric characteristics of the corresponding paste electrodes such as calibration slope, linear range, detection limit, response time and stability were compared with each other. The results appeared comprehensive findings about the role of electrode’s content in electrochemical performance.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Švancara, I., Vytřas, K., Barek, J., and Zima, J., Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem., 2001, vol. 31, p. 311.
Švancara, I., Vytřas, K., Kalcher, K., Walcarius, A., and Wang, J., Electroanalysis, 2009, vol. 21, p. 7.
Lindquist, J., J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem., 1974, vol. 52, p. 37.
Kalcher, K., Kauffmann, J.-M., and Wang, J., Electroanalysis, 1995, vol. 7, p. 5.
Stanic, Z. and Girousi, S., Sens. Electroanal., 2011, vol. 6, p. 89.
Safavi, A., Maleki, N., Honarasa, F., Tajabadi, F., and Sedaghatpour, F., Electroanalysis, 2007, vol. 19, p. 582.
Švancara, I. and Schachl, K., Chem. List., 1999, vol. 499, p. 490.
Lowinsohn, D., Gan, P., Tschulik, K., Foord, J.S., and Compton, R.G., Electroanalysis, 2013, vol. 25, p. 2435.
Maleki, N., Safavi, A., and Tajabadi, F., Anal. Chem., 2006, vol. 78, p. 3820.
Safavi, A., Maleki, N., Aghakhani Mahyari, F., and Doroodmand, M.M., Fullerenes, Nanotub. Carbon Nanostructures, 2013, vol. 21, p. 472.
Wang, J., Electroanalysis, 2005, vol. 17, p. 7.
Shao, Y., Wang, J., Wu, H., Liu, J., Aksay, I., and Lin, Y., Electroanalysis, 2010, vol. 22, p. 1027.
Mordkovich, V.Z. and Karaeva, A.R., Fullerenes, Nanotub. Carbon Nanostructures, 2010, vol. 18, p. 516.
Goze, C., Vaccarini, L., Henrard, L., Bernier, P., Hemandez, E., and Rubio, A., Synth. Met., 1999, vol. 103, p. 2500.
Kaneto, K., Tsuruta, M., Sakai, G., Cho, W. Y., and Ando, Y., Synth. Met., 1999, vol. 103, p. 2543.
Valentini, F., Amine, A., Orlanducci, S., Terranova, M.L., and Palleschi, G., Anal. Chem., 2003, vol. 75, p. 5413.
Rivas, G., Rubianes, M.D., Pedano, M.L., Ferreyra, N.F., Luque, G.L., Rodríguez, M.C., and Miscoria, S., Electroanalysis, 2007, vol. 19, p. 823.
Yang, W., Ratinac, K.R., Ringer, S.P., Thordarson, P., Gooding, J.J., and Braet, F., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 2010, vol. 49, p. 2114.
Chen, M.L., Park, C.Y., Meng, Z.D., Zhu, L., Choi, J.G., Ghosh, T., Kim, I.J., Yang, S., Bae, M.K., Zhang, F.J., and Oh, W.C., Fullerenes Nanotub. Carbon Nanostructures, 2013, vol. 21, p. 525.
Alwarappan, S., Erdem, A., Liu, C., and Li, C., J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, vol. 113, p. 8853.
Wang, Y., Li, Y., Tang, L., Lu, J., and Li, J., Electrochem. Commun., 2009, vol. 11, p. 889.
Kovtyukhova, N.I., Ollivier, P.J., Martin, B.R., Mallouk, T.E., Chizhik, S., Buzaneva, E.V., and Gorchinskiy, A.D., Chem. Mater., 1999, vol. 11, p. 771.
Wang, Y., Li, Y., Tang, L., Lu, J., and Li, J., Electrochem. Commun., 2009, vol. 11, p. 889.
Shamsipur, M., Tashkhourian, J., Hemmateenejad, B., and Sharghi, H., Talanta, 2004, vol. 64, p. 590.
Ceresa, A., Sokalski, T., and Pretsch, E., J. Electroanal. Chem., 2001, vol. 501, p. 70.
Marinho, B., Ghislandi, M., Tkalya, E., Koning, C.E., and With, G., Powder Technol., 2012, vol. 221, p. 351.
Dreyer, D.R., Park, S., Bielawski, C.W., and Ruoff, R.S., Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, vol. 39, p. 228.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Published in Russian in Elektrokhimiya, 2016, Vol. 52, No. 10, pp. 1073–1078.
The article is published in the original.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Honarasa, F., Zare, M. & Yousefinejad, S. Comparison of different carbon nanostructures influence on potentiometric performance of carbon paste electrode. Russ J Electrochem 52, 955–959 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1023193516100050
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1023193516100050