Abstract
Heterologous expression of biosynthetic pathways is an important way to research and discover microbial natural products. Bacillus subtilis is a suitable host for the heterologous production of natural products from bacilli and related Firmicutes. Existing technologies for heterologous expression of large biosynthetic gene clusters in B. subtilis are complicated. Herein, we present a simple and rapid strategy for direct cloning based heterologous expression of biosynthetic pathways in B. subtilis via Red/ET recombineering, using a 5.2 kb specific direct cloning vector carrying homologous sequences to the amyE gene in B. subtilis and CcdB counterselection marker. Using a two-step procedure, two large biosynthetic pathways for edeine (48.3 kb) and bacillomycin (37.2 kb) from Brevibacillus brevis X23 and B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42, respectively, were directly cloned and subsequently integrated into the chromosome of B. subtilis within one week. The gene cluster for bacillomycin was successfully expressed in the heterologous host, although edeine production was not detectable. Compared with similar technologies, this method offers a simpler and more feasible system for the discovery of natural products from bacilli and related genera.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Microorganisms produce a large number of secondary metabolites, the main resource for pharmaceuticals and bio-pesticides1,2,3,4. Many of these natural products belong to the polyketide and nonribosomal peptide families synthesized by large multienzyme megasynthetases, known as polyketide synthases (PKSs) and nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs), respectively5,6,7. Occasionally, the transfer of a secondary metabolite pathway from the original producing microorganism into a suitable heterologous host, that is, heterologous expression, is warranted for the following purposes: to demonstrate the gene cluster required for the biosynthesis of a compound; to increase the yield of a compound; to discover microbial natural products, which are difficult to culture or not genetically amenable; or to generate natural product derivatives or unnatural products by modification of biosynthetic pathways in a genetically amenable host8,9.
Bacilli is one of the largest resources of natural products, from which numerous secondary metabolite biosynthetic pathways have been detected10,11,12. The increasing number of published genome sequences of bacilli strains has revealed that a large number of biosynthetic pathways are cryptic in bacilli, particularly for strains not belonging to Bacillus genera12. These bacteria are generally difficult to genetically manipulate, thereby impeding the discovery of novel natural products from these microbes by genome mining13. However, the cloning and heterologous expression of these cryptic gene clusters in an amenable host has been proven to be a feasible approach to uncover natural products from genetically hard-to-handle bacteria8,9,14. The selection of a suitable heterologous host as well as efficient cloning and transferring large gene clusters is the key issue for successful heterologous expression8. Bacillus subtilis is the best host for the heterologous expression of the secondary metabolite biosynthetic pathways from Bacillus and related genera. First, B. subtilis is a well-studied non-pathogenic bacteria with excellent fermentation characteristics15,16. Second, B. subtilis possesses functional and genetic background similar to its related species and genera for the biosynthesis of natural products and their required precursors. Third, B. subtilis has sophisticated and simple genetic operation approaches and tools, particularly for the integration of large foreign DNA fragments into the chromosome by natural transformation, with a capacity of more than 3 Mb17,18. Several secondary metabolite biosynthetic pathways have been successfully expressed in B. subtilis, for example, bacitracin biosynthetic gene cluster from B. licheniformis19, nisin biosynthetic gene cluster from Lactococcus lactis20, polymyxin biosynthetic gene cluster from Paenibacillus polymyxa21, enniatin biosynthetic gene cluster from Fusarium.sp22, amicoumacin biosynthetic gene cluster from B. subtilis14, and 6 -deoxyerythronolide B biosynthetic gene cluster from Saccharopolyspora erythraea23.
However, obtaining secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters is challenging, as these gene clusters are typically large, ranging from10 to 100 kb. Conventionally, fosmid or cosmid genomic libraries have been constructed to obtain the gene clusters of interest; however screening the correct clones is an extremely time-consuming and laborious task24,25. Recently, simple technologies have been developed to directly clone large biosynthetic gene clusters from genomic DNA, such as Gibson assembly26, transformation-associated recombination (TAR)27, φ BT1 integrase-mediated direct cloning28, oriT-directed capture29, Cas9-Assisted Targeting of Chromosome segments (CATCH)30, and Red/ET recombineering31. Direct cloning via Red/ET recombineering32,33 is based on in vivo linear plus linear homologous recombination (LLHR) in E. coli mediated by the prophage recombinases RecE and RecT, representing a powerful method for the cloning and genetic engineering of natural product biosynthetic pathways. To date, several gene clusters have been cloned and heterologously expressed using this method, including the luminmycin31,34, luminmide31, syringolin35, glidobactin34, colibactin36, sevadicin37, and salinomycin38 gene clusters.
Linear cloning vector for direct cloning in Red/ET recombineering comprises only two elements, the plasmid replication origin and antibiotic selection marker maintained in E. coli29, lacking maintenance or transfer elements for other heterologous hosts. Thus, several steps for further modifications were required to add heterologous expression elements, such as a suitable promoter, appropriate antibiotic selection marker and chromosomal integration elements, to the cloned gene cluster38. Therefore, in the present study, we constructed a specific cloning vector for direct cloning carrying homologous sequence to B. subtilis and established a simple and rapid strategy for the direct cloning of natural product biosynthesis gene clusters and expression in B. subtilis via Red/ET recombineering. The recombinant plasmid that contains the cloned gene cluster can be directly integrated into the chromosome of B. subtilis without further modification. For proof of principal, two NPRS gene clusters, the edeine39 biosynthetic pathway (48.9 kb) from a biocontrol bacteria Brevibacillus brevis X2340 and the bacillomycin41 biosynthetic pathway (37.2 kb) from B. amyloliquefaciens FZB4242 were directly cloned using this vector and each one was integrated into chromosome of B. subtilis within one week. The results showed bacillomycin has been successfully produced in the heterologous host. This work will further facilitate the heterologous expression of natural product biosynthetic pathways in B. subtilis.
Results
Repair of the sfp gene in B. subtilis 1A751 to construct a functional host for NRPS and PKS
B. subtilis 1A75143, a two protease-deficient derivative of B. subtilis16818, has a clear genetic background, sophisticated genetic manipulation method and lower protease activity, making this bacterium to be a good candidate as a heterologous host. Although B. subtilis 168 and its derivative, B. subtilis 1A751, have several biosynthetic gene clusters for PKSs and NRPSs in the chromosome44, such as surfactin and fengycin44, these strains cannot produce these secondary metabolites, as the sfp gene encoding for 4′phosphopantetheinyl transferase (PPTase), an essential enzyme for the production of both PKS and NRPS45, is mutated and dysfuntional45. Sequence alignment with the functional sfp genes from other B. subtilis strains, including B. subtilis LM4-2(gb: CP011101.1), B. subtilis KCTC1028 (gb: CP011115.1), B. subtilis D12-5 (gb: CP014858.1), B. subtilis UD1022 (gb: CP011534.1), B. subtilis 6051HGW (gb: CP003329.1), and B. subtilis CU1050 (gb: CP014166.1), showed a single-DNA-base T insertional mutation resulting in a frameshift at 105 bp downstream from the ATG start codon in the sfp gene of B. subtilis 168 (Fig. 1A). To demonstrate whether this insertional mutation was solely responsible for sfp gene inactivation in B. subtilis 1A751, we deleted this base-pair insertion using in situ integration of a repaired sfp gene via the repair vector pBR322-Amp-HAF-sfp-lox-cm-HAR and subsequently excised the chloramphenicol resistance gene (Cm) using the Cre-lox system46, as illustrated in Fig. S1 and Fig. 1B. After verification by sequencing, the correct transformants, B. subtilis 1A751 + sfp, were subjected to haemolytic activity analyses by blood agar methods47. After a 2-day incubation at 37 °C, a colourless, transparent ring around the colony of the sfp gene repaired strain, B. subtilis 1A751 + sfp, was detected as a qualitative indicator of the production of surfactin47, while no transparent ring was detected around the colony of B. subtilis 1A751 (Fig. 1C). Subsequently, LC-MS detection was conducted to further verify the production of surfactin and other secondary metabolites in B. subtilis 1A751 + sfp. Subsequently, a differential analysis of the metabolite profiles between B. subtilis 1A751 and B. subtilis 1A751 + sfp were performed using HPLC-MS. Three major surfactin analogues, C13-surfactin (m/z 1008.6 [M + H]+), C14-surfactin (m/z 1022.7 [M + H]+), and C15-surfactin (m/z 1036.7 [M + H]+) (Fig. 1Da/Db) and two major fengycin analogues, Ala-6-C17 fengycin (m/z 1477.8 [M + H]+) and Val-6-C17 fengycin (m/z 1505.8 [M + H]+) (Fig. 1Da/Db) were detected in B. subtilis 1A751 + sfp. Instead of transferring a foreign sfp gene14,21, this study is the first to report the in situ repair of a point mutation in the sfp gene of the B. subtilis 168 derivative, generating a PKS/NPRS producer strain. Furthermore, this strain could also serve as a heterologous host for the expression of PKS/NRPS gene clusters from bacilli.
Construction of a cloning vector for direct cloning and heterologous expression in B. subtilis
To construct a specific cloning vector for direct cloning containing elements for gene cluster horizontal transfer to B. subtilis, five fragments (backbone of p15A, amyEF, Amp-ccdB, Spect, and amyER) with 50-bp overlapping sequences in both terminal were co-transformed into E. coli GB05dir-gyrA46248, a CcdB-resistant E. coli strain containing RecE and RecT recombinases, to generate the cloning vector p15A-amyEF-Amp-ccdB-Spect-amyER by Red/ET quintuple LLHR, as illustrated in Fig. S2. The resulting direct cloning vector comprised four elements, a p15A origin for plasmid propagation in E. coli, a versatile spectinomycin resistance gene for selection in both E. coli and B. subtilis, two homologous arms (HA) upstream and downstream of the amyE gene (amyEF and amyER) of B. subtilis for the specific integration of cloned gene clusters into the chromosome of B. subtilis 1A751 + sfp in the amyE gene loci, and a counterselection marker gene ccdB48 to reduce the background of the original vector during PCR generation of the linear cloning vector. After restriction endonuclease digestion analysis and sequencing, we validated the function of the toxic protein CcdB as previously described44. To this end, we transformed the vector p15A-amyEF-Amp-ccdB-Spect-amyER into E. coli GB-dir, a CcdB-sensitive strain, and E. coli GB05dir-gyrA46248, a CcdB-resistant E. coli strain. After recovery, 10 μl of culture were plated onto LB plates supplemented with spectinomycin. No transformants were detected on the plates containing the vector transformed into the CcdB-sensitive strain, while numerous of transformants were detected on plates containing the vector transformed into the CcdB-resistant E. coli strain. These results suggested that the ccdB gene in the vector p15A-amyEF-Amp-ccdB-Spect-amyER is functional to reduce the background of the original vector.
Direct cloning of biosynthesis gene clusters of natural products
To demonstrate the feasibility of the improved cloning vector, we cloned and heterologously expressed two desired NPRS gene clusters: the biosynthetic pathway for edeine (ede, 48.9 kb), an atypical cationic peptide with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity37 from the biocontrol bacteria Brevibacillus brevis X2338, and the biosynthetic pathway for bacillomycin (bmy, 37.2 kb), an antifungal lipopeptide from B. amyloliquefaciens FZB4240, according to the two-step procedure described in Fig. 2. Using the cloning vector p15A-amyEF-Amp-ccdB-Spect-amyER as the template, we designed two pairs of primers to generate linear cloning vectors (p15A-amyEF-Spect-amyER) carrying the terminal 70-bp homology arms of ede and bmy gene clusters, respectively, using PCR. The 5′ and 3′ homology arms were selected at the location of suitable restriction enzyme sites flanking the gene clusters. Using one step LLHR, these two biosynthetic gene clusters were successfully cloned into the cloning vectors, with the efficiency of 2/24 and 3/24, respectively. The resulting recombinant plasmids containing the ede or bmy gene clusters were designed as p15A-amyEF-Spect-amyER-ede and p15A-amyEF-Spect-amyER-bmy. The correct clones were verified by restriction enzyme analysis (Fig. S3A/B). Consistent with the close genetic relationship between the producer strain and heterologous host stain, all of the cloned gene clusters were under the control of their original promoters. The ede gene cluster of the recombinant plasmid p15A-amyEF-Spect-amyER-ede can be directly used to transfer into B. subtilis without further modification. Another gene cluster-containing plasmid, p15A-amyEF-Spect-amyER-bmy, contains a 1.5 kb redundant region downstream from the bacillomycin gene cluster, which was highly homologous to the host strain B. subtilis 1A751 + sfp. We knocked out this region by linear plus circular homologous recombination (LCHR) mediated by the λ phage recombinase Redαβγ using a lox71-cm-lox66 cassette and excised the antibiotic marker by a Cre-loxP systems to ensure the specific integration of the cloned gene cluster into the amyE gene locus of B. subtilis 1A751 + sfp, generating the recombinant plasmid p15A-amyEF-Spect-amyER-bmy2, followed by verification by restriction enzyme analysis (Fig. S3B).
Heterologous expression of the bacillomycin biosynthetic gene cluster
The recombinant plasmids p15A-amyEF-Spect-amyER-ede and p15A-amyEF-Spect-amyER-bmy2 were transferred into B. subtilis 1A751 + sfp by natural competence transformation49. The cloned gene clusters were integrated into the amyE gene loci of B. subtilis 1A751 + sfp by double crossover to obtain the final heterologous expression strains B. subtilis 1A751 + sfp + ede and B. subtilis 1A751 + sfp + bmy. To verify that the correct transformant resulting from double crossover, we selected 10 spectinomycin-resistant colonies from each transformation to conduct 5′ and 3′ junction colony PCR, as illustrated in Fig. 3A. According to the predicted size of the PCR products of both 5′ and 3′ junction PCR, all ten colonies from the transformation of plasmids p15A-amyEF-Spect-amyER-ede with both 5′ junction PCR fragments and 3′ junction PCR fragments showed the correct insertion resulting from double crossover event (Fig. 3B). Two colonies in the transformation of plasmid p15A-amyEF-Spect-amyER-bmy2 with both 5′ junction PCR fragments and 3′ junction PCR fragments showed the correct insertion resulting from double crossover, and other five colonies with only 3′ junction PCR fragments might have resulted from a single crossover event (Fig. 3C). The correct transformants were subsequently analysed using HPLC-MS to detect the products (Fig. 3D). Comparative analysis of the metabolite profiles between B. subtilis 1A751 + sfp and B. subtilis 1A751 + sfp + ede/bmy were performed using HPLC-MS. No obvious difference was detected between the metabolite profiles of B. subtilis 1A751 + sfp and B. subtilis 1A751 + sfp + ede (data not shown). However, three additional peaks were detected in B. subtilis 1A751 + sfp + bmy and were identified as bacillomycin D analogues, C14-bacillomycin D (m/z 1031.5), C15-bacillomycin D (m/z 1045.6) and C16-bacillomycin D (m/z 1059.6) (Fig. 3D/E). This result indicated that the bmy gene cluster from B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 was successfully expressed in heterologous host B. subtilis 1A751 + sfp, which demonstrated that this two-step procedure of direct cloning and heterologous expression is effective and efficient. To examine the stability of the bmy gene clusters in the heterologous host, we monitored bacillomycin production and performed PCR to detect several different regions in the gene cluster after several rounds of culture in LB medium containing antibiotics. The results showed that the bmy gene cluster were stably maintained in the host(data not shown).
Discussion
Red/ET recombineering has been widely applied for direct cloning and modification of natural product biosynthetic pathways31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38. Herein, we specially facilitate the application of Red/ET recombineering for direct cloning and heterologous expression of natural product biosynthesis gene clusters in B. subtilis. To clone and express a desired gene cluster in B. subtilis, we just need to synthesize a pair of primers containing 70-bp homologous arms to generate a linear cloning vector flanked with the homologous arms using PCR based on a specific cloning vector. After direct cloning by LLHR, the cloned gene clusters can be directly integrated into the chromosome of B. subtilis without any further modification. All of the procedures can be completed within one week if the gene cluster is intact and has no homologous region with the host strain.
Li et al. reported a similar strategy of rapid “plug-and-play” genomic capture and expression of bacilli-based natural products in B. subtilis via TAR22, which also uses a specific capture vector that contains elements for gene cluster horizontal transfer to B. subtilis. In contrast to this approach, there are three major advantages to the method present herein. First, it is based on Red/ET recombineering in E. coli, is simpler and more convenient for using short homologous arms (70 bp), omitting several steps of inserting two 1-kb capture arms corresponding to gene clusters into the cloning vector and of reintroducing vectors contain cloned gene cluster from Saccharomyces cerevisiae into E. coli. Second, the use of a shorter linear cloning vector (4.2 kb) coupled with a CcdB toxin protein gene dramatically decreases the rate of negative clones, reducing the likelihood of vector self-cyclization and decreasing the background of the original vector31,48. Third, compared with the unregulated yeast homologous recombinase in TAR, the recombinase system in Red/ET recombineering is strictly regulated by an arabinose-inducible promoter PBAD31, which reduced the occurrence of unintended recombination in the gene cluster after it has been cloned29.
The failure to achieve heterologous expression of the gene cluster for edeine in B. subtilis, likely reflects a mutation in the cloned gene cluster of edeine, as edeine shows strong antibiotic activity to both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria39. Subsequently, the entire plasmid p15A-amyEF-Spect-amyER-ede (52.9 kb) which was selected to transform into B.subtilis was completely sequenced. However, the sequencing result showed that no mutation was detected in the gene cluster. Therefore, there might be other reasons that lack heterologous edeine expression. First, B. subtilis might not produce all of the necessary precursors required for edeine, such as spermidine and 1,3-Diaminopropane39. Second, the promoter of ede gene clusters from Brevibacillus brevis might be incompatible with B. subtilis, reflecting the comparatively distant phylogenetic relationship between these species. Further studies of edeine heterologous expression are underway to elucidate these hypothetical reasons.
In summary, we constructed a specific cloning vector for the direct cloning of biosynthetic gene clusters of natural products from bacilli and simplify further modifications after direct cloning. In addition, we successfully cloned two gene clusters using this vector and detected products of bacillimycin. These results demonstrate the significant potential use of Red/ET recombineering-mediated direct cloning and heterologous expression for genome mining of novel natural products or improving the yield of compounds from bacilli.
Methods
Strains, plasmids and culture conditions
The bacterial strains and plasmids used in the present study are shown in Table S1. All primers were synthesized at Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China) Co., Ltd. (Table S2). All restriction enzymes and DNA markers were purchased from New England Biolabs (UK) Ltd.(Hertfordshire, UK). Taq polymerase was purchased from TaKaRa Bio Inc. (Dalian, China). DNA sequencing was performed at Hunan Tsingke Biotech Co., Ltd. (Changsha, China). E. coli and B. subtilis cells were cultured in Luria-Bertani (LB) liquid media or on LB agar (1.2% agar). For E. coli, chloramphenicol (15 μg mL−1), ampicillin (100 μg mL−1) or spectinomycin (60 μg mL−1) were added to the media as required. B. subtilis recombinants were selected on LB medium containing chloramphenicol (5 μg mL−1) and spectinomycin (80 μg mL−1).
Repair of a point mutation in the sfp gene of B. subtilis
The dot mutation of the sfp gene was corrected using overlapping-extension PCR (fusion PCR), as illustrated in Fig. S1A. The correct sfp gene was introduced into the B. subtilis 1A751 chromosome via the integration vector pBR322-Amp-HAF-sfp-lox-cm-HAR. The integration vector was constructed from four gene fragments, pBR322-Amp, HAF-sfp, lox71-cm-lox66, and HAR, via Red/ET multiple recombination (Fig. S1B). The pBR322-Amp was PCR amplified from vector pBR322-Amp-U6-ccdB-cm using primers pBR322-Amp-F/R. HAF was amplified from the genomic DNA of B. subtilis 1A751 using primers yczE-R(P1)/sfp-correct-F(P2), and the sfp-R was amplified using primers sfp-correct-R(P3)/sfp-F(P4). The HAF-sfp was amplified from OE-PCR of HAF, and sfp-back was amplified using primers yczE-R(P1)/sfp-F(P4). The lox71-cm-lox66 was amplified from vector pAD123 using primers lox71-cm-F/lox66-cm-R. HAR was amplified from genomic DNA. Red/ET multiple recombineering was conducted according to a previous approach38. The correct recombinant vector was confirmed by restriction enzyme digestion and sequencing. The vector pBR322-Amp-HAF-sfp-lox-cm-HAR, containing 1.0-kb homology regions corresponding to the upstream and downstream adjacent regions of the gene sfp, were linearized and subsequently transferred into B. subtilis 1A751 by natural competence transformation. The correct sfp-repaired strains B. subtilis 1A751-sfp-lox-cm were screened by PCR, followed by sequencing and haemolysis testing47. After transformation and induction of the Cre-expression vector pDG148-Cre, the chloramphenicol resistance gene (Cm) was excised from the chromosome of B. subtilis 1A751-sfp-lox-cm, resulting in the host strain B. subtilis 1A751 + sfp (Fig. 1B). Natural competence transformation of B. subtilis was conducted according to Cutting and Vander49.
Construction of the cloning vector for direct cloning of gene clusters
The cloning vector p15A-amyEF-Amp-ccdB-Spect-amyER, was constructed from the following five gene fragments, p15A-origin, amyEF, Amp-ccdB, Spect, and amyER via Red/ET multiple recombination, as illustrated in Fig. S2. The p15A-origin was PCR amplified from vector p15A-amp-ccdB using primers p15A-F/R. The 1-kb upstream and 1-kb downstream homologous arms of the B. subtilis amyE gene, namely amyEF and amyER, required for gene cluster integration in B. subtilis, were PCR amplified from B. subtilis 168 genomic DNA using primers amyEF F/R and amyER F/R, respectively. The Amp-ccdB fragment, comprising the Amp resistance gene and toxic protein CcdB gene, was PCR amplified from vector p15A-amp-ccdB using primers Amp-ccdB F/R. Spect, the spectinomycin resistance gene, was amplified from vector p7S6 using primers Spect-F/R. Five fragments with 50-bp overlapping sequences with the adjacent fragment at both terminal, were co-transformed into GB05dir-gyrA46248, a CcdB-resistant E. coli strain containing the mutation GyrA R462M mutation and LLHR-proficient recombinases (RecET, Redγ, and RecA). Red/ET multiple recombineering was conducted as previously described38. The correct recombinant vector was confirmed by restriction enzyme digestion and sequencing.
Bacterial genomic DNA isolation
Bacterial genomic DNA isolation was performed as previously described with slight modifications31. B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 or Brevibacillus brevis X23 was cultured overnight in 50 mL of LB medium at 30 °C. After centrifugation of 1.8 mL culture in a 2 ml centrifuge tube, and the cells were washed once with 1 mL of sterile water, and subsequently resuspended in 450 μL of 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. After adding 22.5 μL of lysozyme (20 mg mL−1) at a final concentration of 1 mg mL−1 followed by incubation at 37 °C for 1 h, 30 μL of proteinase K (20 mg mL−1) and 40 μL of 10% SDS were added and mixed well by inverting the tubes several times. The mixture was incubated at 50 °C for 1~2 h with occasional inversion until the solution became clear. The solution was combined with 500 μL phenol: chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) and the tubes were inverted more than 30 times until the mixture was completely white. After centrifugation at 13500 rpm for 15 min, 300 μL of aqueous phase solution was transferred to a fresh 1.5 mL tube using a 1 mL pipette tip (the little end of tip was cut to create a larger opening), and the DNA was precipitated after adding 35 μL of 3 M NaOAc (pH7.5) and one volume of isopropanol, with gentle inverting. The DNA was transferred to a new 2-mL centrifuge tube, rinsed with 1 mL of 75% ethanol. The mixture was centrifuged for 1 min at 1,000 rpm, the supernatant was discarded, and the DNA pellet was dried on the bench for 15-25 min, and dissolved in 200 μL of ddH2O.
Direct cloning of the bmy and ede gene clusters using Red/ET recombination
Direct cloning was performed as previously described with slight modifications31. To clone the bmy gene cluster, linear cloning vector p15A- amyEF-Spect-amyER, flanked with 70 bp homology arms to target the gene cluster was PCR amplified from vector p15A-amyEF-Amp-ccdB-Spect-amyER using primers bmy-F/R. Approximately 20 μg of the genomic DNA of B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 was digested with CspCI, for 4~6 h and subsequently extracted with phenol: chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (25: 24: 1) to remove the residual restriction enzyme. After precipitation and washing, the digested genomic DNA (10 μg) was mixed with 200 ng of the linear cloning vector and co-transformed into E. coli GB05-dir, in which araC-PBAD-redγRecET was integrated into the chromosome by electroporation31. After plasmid extraction, the correct transformant containing the bmy gene cluster was confirmed by restriction analysis, resulting in p15A-amyEF-Spect-amyER-bmy. Using the same procedure, the genomic DNA of Brevibacillus brevis X23 was digested using SwaI and EagI, and the ede gene cluster was cloned using primers ede-F/R, resulting in an recombinant plasmid p15A-amyEF-Spect-amyER-ede containing ede gene cluster.
Deletion of a redundant homologous region in p15A-amyEF-Spect-amyER-bmy
The plasmid p15A-amyEF-Spect-amyER-bmy was transferred into E. coli GB05-Red, in which araC-PBAD-redγβα was integrated into the chromosome31. The lox71-cm-lox66 fragment was PCR amplified from vector p15A-cm-ccdB48 using primers lox-cm-F/R, and subsequently was introduced into E. coli GB05-Red harboring p15A-amyEF-Spect-amyER-bmy. After recombination, lox71-cm-lox66 replaced the redundant genomic region of p15A-amyEF-Spect-amyER-bmy. The resulting plasmid p15A-amyEF-Spect-amyER-bmy-lox-cm was confirmed by restriction enzyme digestion analysis. After introducing and inducing the expression of a Cre plasmid pSC101-BAD-Cre-tet, the chloramphenicol resistance gene (Cm) was excised from p15A-amyEF-Spect-amyER-bmy-lox-cm to obtain p15A-amyEF-Spect-amyER-bmy2.
Heterologous expression of the bmy gene cluster
The plasmid p15A-amyEF-Spect-amyER-bmy2 or p15A-amyEF-Spect-amyER-ede, flanked by two 1-kb homologous regions corresponding to the upstream and downstream regions of the gene amyE in B. subtilis 1A751 + sfp, were transferred into B. subtilis 1A751 + sfp by natural competence transformation to obtain B. subtilis 1A751 + sfp + bmy or B. subtilis 1A751 + sfp + ede. To detect the correct transformants of the ede gene cluster, spectinomycin-resistant clones were identified by 5′ and 3′ junction colony PCR using primers amyE-T-5/ede-T-5 and amyE-T-3/ede-T-3, respectively (Fig. 3A/B). To detect the correct transformant of the ede gene cluster, spectinomycin-resistant clones were identified by 5′ and 3′ junction colony PCR using primers amyE-T-5/bmy-T-5 and amyE-T-3/bmy-T-3, respectively (Fig. 3A/C). PCR-positive clones were routinely grown in LB broth containing spectinomycin (60 μg mL−1) at 30 °C overnight. 2% (1.0 mL) of the preculture was inoculated into 50 mL of BPY media containing spectinomycin (60 μg mL−1) and grown at 30 °C in a 250-mL flask with constant agitation at 180 rpm. After culture for 24 h, 2% sterilized resin Amberlite XAD-16 was added and the incubation was continued for two more days. After harvesting by centrifugation at 8,000 rpm for 8 min, the pellets and resins were extracted with 30 mL of methanol. The extracts were evaporated and dissolved in 1 mL of methanol and used for HPLC-MS analysis. The HPLC-MS measurement was performed on a Thermo Scientific Dionex Ultimate 3000 LC system coupled with a Bruker impact HD Q-TOF mass spectrometer. The MS data were acquired in the positive ion mode with a range of 200–2,000 m/z scans with auto MS2 fragmentation. Reversed-phase chromatography of UPLC was conducted with 250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size columns (YMC, C18, Japan) at a solvent gradient (with solvents A (water and 0.1% formic acid) and B (CH3CN and 0.1% formic acid): 5% B from 0 to 5 min, 5% B–95% B within 40 min, followed by 15 min with 95% B at a flow rate of 0.75 mL/min). The MS measurement was conducted on a Q-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) using a standard ESI source.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Liu, Q. et al. Simple and rapid direct cloning and heterologous expression of natural product biosynthetic gene cluster in Bacillus subtilis via Red/ET recombineering. Sci. Rep. 6, 34623; doi: 10.1038/srep34623 (2016).
References
Newman, D. J. & Cragg, G. M. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the 30 years from 1981 to 2010. J Nat Prod. 75, 311–335 (2012).
Demain, A. L. Importance of microbial natural products and the need to revitalize their discovery. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 41, 185–201 (2014).
Genilloud, O. The re-emerging role of microbial natural products in antibiotic discovery. Anton Leeuw Int J G. 106, 173–188 (2014).
Li, J. W. & Vederas, J. C. Drug discovery and natural products: end of an era or an endless frontier? Science 325, 161–165 (2009).
Weissman, K. J. Complex Enzymes in Microbial Natural Product Biosynthesis, Part B: Polyketides, Aminocoumarins and Carbohydrate 459, 3–16 (2009).
Finking, R. & Marahiel M. A. Biosynthesis of nonribosomal peptides. Annu Rev Microbiol. 58, 453–488 (2004).
Fischbach, M. A. & Walsh, C. T. Assembly-line enzymology for polyketide and non-ribosomal peptide antibiotics: logic, machinery, and mechanisms. Chem Rev. 106(8), 3468–3496 (2006).
Silke, C. W. & Rolf, M. Recent developments towards the heterologous expression of complex bacterial natural product biosynthetic pathways. Curr Opin Biotech. 16, 594–606 (2005).
Sarah, E. O. et al. Recent advances in the heterologous expression of microbial natural product biosynthetic pathways. Nat. Prod. Rep. 30, 1121–1138 (2013).
Stein, T. Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: structures, syntheses and specific functions. Mol Microbiol. 56, 845–857 (2005).
Cimermancic, P. et al. Insights into secondary metabolism from a global analysis of prokaryotic biosynthetic gene clusters. Cell 158, 412–421 (2014).
Gajender, A., Angela, S. & Günter, B. Genome mining: Prediction of lipopeptides and polyketides from Bacillus and related Firmicutes. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 13, 192–203 (2015).
Bachmann, B. O., Van Lanen, S. G. & Baltz, R. H. Microbial genome mining for accelerated natural products discovery: Is a renaissance in the making? J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 41, 175–184 (2014).
Li, Y. X. et al. Directed natural product biosynthesis gene cluster capture and expression in the model bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Sci. Rep. 5, 9383 (2015).
Moszer, I. et al. Subtilist: The reference database for the Bacillus subtilis genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 62–65 (2002).
Kunst, F. et al. The complete genome sequence of the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Nature 390, 249–256 (1997).
Tetsuo, I. & Shinya, K. Bacillus subtilis genome vector-based complete manipulation and reconstruction of genomic DNA for mouse transgenesis. BMC Genomics 14, 300 (2013).
Itaya, M., Tsuge, K., Koizumi, M. & Fujita, K. Combining two genomes in one cell: Stable cloning of the Synechocystis PCC6803 genome in the Bacillus subtilis 168 genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15971–15976 (2005).
Eppelmann, K., Doekel, S. & Marahiel, M. A. Engineered biosynthesis of the peptide antibiotic bacitracin in the surrogate host Bacillus subtilis. J Biol Chem. 276, 34824–34831 (2001).
Yuksel, S. & Hansen, J. N. Transfer of nisin gene cluster from Lactococcus lactis ATCC 11454 into the chromosome of Bacillus subtilis 168. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 74, 640–649 (2007).
Choi, S. K. et al. Identification of a polymyxin synthetase gene cluster of Paenibacillus polymyxa and heterologous expression of the gene in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 191, 3350–3358 (2009).
Sophia, Z. et al. Bacillus subtilis as heterologous host for the secretory production of the non-ribosomal cyclodepsipeptide enniatin. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 99, 681–691 (2015).
Jana, K. et al. Production of the polyketide 6-deoxyerythronolide B in the heterologous host Bacillus subtilis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 100, 1209–1220 (2016).
Fu, J. et al. Efficient transfer of two large secondary metabolite pathway gene clusters into heterologous hosts by transposition. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, e113 (2008).
Chai, Y. et al. Heterologous expression and genetic engineering of the tubulysin biosynthetic gene cluster using Red/ET recombineering and inactivation mutagenesis. Chem. Biol. 19, 361–371 (2012).
Gibson, D. G. et al. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat. Methods. 6, 343–345 (2009).
Yamanaka, K. et al. Direct cloning and refactoring of a silent lipopeptide biosynthetic gene cluster yields the antibiotic taromycin A. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 1957–1962 (2014).
Kvitko, B. H., McMillan, I. A. & Schweizer, H. P. An Improved Method for oriT-Directed Cloning and Functionalization of Large Bacterial Genomic Regions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 4869–4878 (2013).
Du, D. et al. Genome engineering and direct cloning of antibiotic gene clusters via phage ϕBT1 integrase-mediated site-specific recombination in Streptomyces. Sci. Rep. 5 (2015).
Jiang W. et al. Cas9-Assisted Targeting of CHromosome segments CATCH enables one-step targeted cloning of large gene clusters. Nat. Commun. 6, 8101 (2015).
Fu, J. et al. Full-length RecE enhances linear-linear homologous recombination and facilitates direct cloning for bioprospecting. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 440–446 (2012).
Zhang, Y., Buchholz, F., Muyrers, J. P. & Stewart, A. F. A new logic for DNA engineering using recombination in Escherichia coli. Nat. Genet. 20, 123–128 (1998).
Zhang, Y., Muyrers, J. P., Testa, G. & Stewart, A. F. DNA cloning by homologous recombination in Escherichia coli. Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 1314–1317 (2000).
Bian, X. et al. Heterologous production of glidobactins/luminmycins in Escherichia coli Nissle containing the glidobactin biosynthetic gene cluster from Burkholderia DSM7029. Chembiochem 15, 2221–2224 (2014).
Bian, X. et al. Direct cloning, genetic engineering, and heterologous expression of the syringolin biosynthetic gene cluster in E. coli through Red/ET recombineering. Chembiochem 13, 1946–1952 (2012).
Bian, X. et al. In vivo evidence for a prodrug activation mechanism during colibactin maturation. Chembiochem 14, 1194–1197 (2013).
Tang, Y. et al. Heterologous expression of an orphan NRPS gene cluster from Paenibacillus larvae in Escherichia coli revealed production of sevadicin. J. Biotechnol. 194, 112–114 (2015).
Yin, J. et al. Direct cloning and heterologous expression of the salinomycin biosynthetic gene cluster from Streptomyces albus DSM41398 in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Scientific Reports 5, 9383 (2015).
Erin, L. et al. Self Resistance to the Atypical Cationic Antimicrobial Peptide Edeine of Brevibacillus brevis Vm4 by the N-Acetyltransferase EdeQ. Chem. Biol. 20, 983–990 (2013).
Chen, W. et al. Draft genome sequence of Brevibacillus brevis strain X23, a biocontrol agent against bacterial wilt. J Bacteriol. 194, 6634–6635 (2012).
Moyne, A. L. et al. Bacillomycin D: an iturin with antifungal activity against Aspergillus flavus. J Appl Microbiol, 90, 622–629 (2001).
Chen, X. H. et al. Comparative analysis of the complete genome sequence of the plant growth-promoting bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Nat. Biotechnol, 25, 1007–1014 (2007).
Kawamura, F. & Doi, R. H. Construction of a Bacillus subtilis double mutant deficient in extracellular alkaline and neutral proteases. J Bacteriol. 160, 442–444 (1984).
Alexandra K. et al. Structural and Functional Characterization of Gene Clusters Directing Nonribosomal Synthesis of Bioactive Cyclic Lipopeptides in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Strain FZB42. J. Bacteriol. 186, 1084–1096 (2004).
Mootz, H. D., Finking, R. & Marahiel, M. A. 4′-phosphopantetheine transfer in primary and secondary metabolism of Bacillus subtilis. J Biol Chem. 276, 37289–37298 (2001).
Yan X. et al. Cre/lox System and PCR-Based Genome Engineering in Bacillus subtilis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 74, 5556–5562 (2008).
Dufour, S. et al. Hemolytic activity of new linear surfactin analogs in relation to their physico-chemical properties. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1726, 87–95 (2005).
Wang, H. et al. Improved seamless mutagenesis by recombineering using ccdB for counterselection. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e37, (2014).
C. R. Harwood & S. M. Cutting . Molecular Biological Methods for Bacillus (ed. C. R. Harwood, S. M. Cutting ) 125–130 (John Wiley & Sons, 1990).
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by Grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31501698), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31101482), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31570094), Science and Technology Projects of State Tobacco Monopoly Bureau (110201302014) and the Recruitment Program of Global Experts in Shandong University. The authors are grateful to the Bacillus Genetic Stock Center for providing bacterial strains and vectors. We appreciate Xin Yan for offering the Cre-lox vectors. The authors acknowledge Carla Roberts’s help in proofreading this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Q.L., Q.S., X.B., W.C., D.L. and Y.Z. designed this study, Q.L., Q.S., H.C. and H.W. executed the experiments, Q.L., Q.S., X.B., J.F., Z.G., P.L. and W.C. performed data collection and analysis, Q.L. and Q.S. drafted the manuscript, X.B., J.F., D.L. and Y.Z. helped with the revision of the final manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Q., Shen, Q., Bian, X. et al. Simple and rapid direct cloning and heterologous expression of natural product biosynthetic gene cluster in Bacillus subtilis via Red/ET recombineering. Sci Rep 6, 34623 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34623
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34623
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Bacteria as genetically programmable producers of bioactive natural products
Nature Reviews Chemistry (2020)
-
Engineering Heterologous Hosts for the Enhanced Production of Non-ribosomal Peptides
Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering (2020)
-
Engineering of a Bacillus subtilis Strain Deficient in Cellulase: Application in Degumming of Ramie
Fibers and Polymers (2019)