Abstract
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is the spectroscopic technique of choice for determining molecular conformations in solution at atomic resolution. As solution NMR spectra are rich in structural and dynamic information, the way in which the data should be acquired and handled to deliver accurate ensembles is not trivial. This Review provides a guide to the NMR experiment selection and parametrization process, the generation of viable theoretical conformer pools and the deconvolution of time-averaged NMR data into a conformer ensemble that accurately represents a flexible molecule in solution. In addition to reviewing the key elements of solution ensemble determination of flexible mid-sized molecules, the feasibility and pitfalls of data deconvolution are discussed with a comparison of the performance of representative algorithms.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
The original NMR spectroscopic (FIDs) and computational data (structure files); input and output files for NAMFIS, NMR_FIT, DISCON and StereoFitter; the simulated and experimental data for validation of the deconvolution algorithms; and the installation files, along with instructions for the installation of NAMFIS, are available at Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6866837.
References
Huang, Z. H., Grape, E. S., Li, J., Inge, A. K. & Zou, X. D. 3D electron diffraction as an important technique for structure elucidation of metal–organic frameworks and covalent organic frameworks. Coord. Chem. Rev. 427, 213583 (2021).
Kuntz, I. D. Structure-based strategies for drug design and discovery. Science 257, 1078–1082 (1992).
Miller, R. J. D. Femtosecond crystallography with ultrabright electrons and X-rays: capturing chemistry in action. Science 343, 1108–1116 (2014).
Danelius, E. et al. Solution conformations explain the chameleonic behaviour of macrocyclic drugs. Chem. Eur. J. 26, 5231–5244 (2020).
Ermondi, G. et al. Managing experimental 3D structures in the beyond-rule-of-5 chemical space: the case of rifampicin. Chem. Eur. J. 27, 10394–10404 (2021).
Haubrich, K., Spiteri, V. A., Farnaby, W., Sobott, F. & Ciulli, A. Breaking free from the crystal lattice: structural biology in solution to study protein degraders. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 79, 102534 (2023).
Pradeilles, J. A. et al. Odd–even alternations in helical propensity of a homologous series of hydrocarbons. Nat. Chem. 12, 475–480 (2020).
Bohle, F. & Grimme, S. Hydrocarbon macrocycle conformer ensembles and 13C-NMR spectra. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202113905 (2022).
Dickman, R. et al. A chemical biology approach to understanding molecular recognition of lipid II by Nisin(1–12): synthesis and NMR ensemble analysis of Nisin(1–12) and analogues. Chem. Eur. J. 25, 14572–14582 (2019).
Hagele, G. NMR controlled titrations characterizing organophosphorus compounds. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 194, 361–363 (2019).
Kolmer, A., Edwards, L. J., Kuprov, I. & Thiele, C. M. Conformational analysis of small organic molecules using NOE and RDC data: a discussion of strychnine and α-methylene-γ-butyrolactone. J. Magn. Res. 261, 101–109 (2015).
Navarro-Vázquez, A., Gil, R. R. & Blinov, K. Computer-assisted 3D structure elucidation (CASE-3D) of natural products combining isotropic and anisotropic NMR parameters. J. Nat. Prod. 81, 203–210 (2018).
Peintner, S. & Erdélyi, M. Pushing the limits of characterising a weak halogen bond in solution. Chem. Eur. J. 28, e202103559 (2022).
Slabber, C. A., Grimmer, C. D. & Robinson, R. S. Solution conformations of curcumin in DMSO. J. Nat. Prod. 79, 2726–2730 (2016).
Teilum, K., Kunze, M. B., Erlendsson, S. & Kragelund, B. B. (S)Pinning down protein interactions by NMR. Protein Sci. 26, 436–451 (2017).
Wu, J. et al. Synergy of synthesis, computation and NMR reveals correct baulamycin structures. Nature 547, 436–440 (2017).
Kwan, E. E. & Huang, S. G. Structural elucidation with NMR spectroscopy: practical strategies for organic chemists. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 2671–2688 (2008).
Bell, R. A. & Saunders, J. K. Correlation of intramolecular nuclear Overhauser effect with internuclear distance. Can. J. Chem. 48, 1114–1122 (1970).
Overhauser, A. W. Polarization of nuclei in metals. Phys. Rev. 92, 411–415 (1953).
Schirmer, R. E., Noggle, J. H., Davis, J. P. & Hart, P. A. Determination of molecular geometry by quantitative application of nuclear overhauser effect. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 92, 3266–3273 (1970).
Slichter, C. P. The discovery and demonstration of dynamic nuclear polarization — a personal and historical account. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12, 5741–5751 (2010).
Karplus, M. Contact electron–spin coupling of nuclear magnetic moments. J. Chem. Phys. 30, 11–15 (1959).
Haasnoot, C. A. G., De Leeuw, F. A. A. M. & Altona, C. The relationship between proton–proton NMR coupling-constants and substituent electronegativities — an empirical generalization of the Karplus equation. Tetrahedron 36, 2783–2792 (1980).
Liu, Y. Z. et al. Application of anisotropic NMR parameters to the confirmation of molecular structure. Nat. Protoc. 14, 217–247 (2019).
Müntener, T., Joss, D., Häussinger, D. & Hiller, S. Pseudocontact shifts in biomolecular NMR spectroscopy. Chem. Rev. 122, 9422–9467 (2022).
Nitsche, C. & Otting, G. Pseudocontact shifts in biomolecular NMR using paramagnetic metal tags. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 98–99, 20–49 (2017).
Pons, M. & Millet, O. Dynamic NMR studies of supramolecular complexes. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 38, 267–324 (2001).
Bryant, R. G. The NMR time scale. J. Chem. Educ. 60, 933–935 (1983).
Pearlman, D. A. FINGAR: a new genetic algorithm-based method for fitting NMR data. J. Biomol. NMR 8, 49–66 (1996).
Wang, J. J., Hodges, R. S. & Sykes, B. D. Generating multiple conformations of flexible peptides in solution based on NMR nuclear Overhauser effect data — application to desmopressin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 8627–8634 (1995).
Wang, S. et al. Incorporating NOE-derived distances in conformer generation of cyclic peptides with distance geometry. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 62, 472–485 (2022).
Güntert, P., Braun, W. & Wüthrich, K. Efficient computation of three-dimensional protein structures in solution from nuclear magnetic resonance data using the program DIANA and the supporting programs CALIBA, HABAS and GLOMSA. J. Mol. Biol. 217, 517–530 (1991).
Wüthrich, K. NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids: 3 (Baker Lecture Series) Vol. 32 (John Wiley & Sons, 1986).
Sattler, M. & Fesik, S. W. Resolving resonance overlap in the NMR spectra of proteins from differential lanthanide-induced shifts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 7885–7886 (1997).
Speciale, I. et al. Liquid-state NMR spectroscopy for complex carbohydrate structural analysis: a Hitchhiker’s guide. Carbohyd. Polym. 277, 118885 (2022).
Varani, G., Aboulela, F. & Allain, F. H. T. NMR investigation of RNA structure. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 29, 51–127 (1996).
Atilaw, Y. et al. Solution conformations shed light on PROTAC cell permeability. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 12, 107–114 (2021).
Poongavanam, V. et al. Linker-dependent folding rationalizes PROTAC cell permeability. J. Med. Chem. 65, 13029–13040 (2022).
Hussain, A., Paukovich, N., Henen, M. A. & Vögeli, B. Advances in the exact nuclear Overhauser effect 2018–2022. Methods 206, 87–98 (2022).
Vögeli, B. The nuclear Overhauser effect from a quantitative perspective. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 78, 1–46 (2014).
Vögeli, B., Olsson, S., Guntert, P. & Riek, R. The exact NOE as an alternative in ensemble structure determination. Biophys. J. 110, 113–126 (2016). This paper discusses ensemble determination in the context of proteins.
Keepers, J. W. & James, T. L. A theoretical study of distance determinations from NMR. Two-dimensional nuclear Overhauser effect spectra. J. Magn. Res. 57, 404–426 (1984).
Kumar, A., Wagner, G., Ernst, R. R. & Wuthrich, K. Buildup rates of the nuclear Overhauser effect measured by two-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy: implications for studies of protein conformation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 103, 3654–3658 (1981).
Macura, S. & Ernst, R. R. Elucidation of cross relaxation in liquids by two-dimensional N.M.R. spectroscopy. Mol. Phys. 41, 95–117 (1980).
Andersen, N. H., Chen, C. P., Marschner, T. M., Krystek, S. R. & Bassolino, D. A. Conformational isomerism of endothelin in acidic aqueous-media — a quantitative NOESY analysis. Biochemistry 31, 1280–1295 (1992).
Blackledge, M. J. et al. Conformational backbone dynamics of the cyclic decapeptide antamanide — application of a new multiconformational search algorithm based on NMR data. Biochemistry 32, 10960–10974 (1993).
Cicero, D. O., Barbato, G. & Bazzo, R. NMR analysis of molecular flexibility in solution: a new method for the study of complex distributions of rapidly exchanging conformations. Application to a 13-residue peptide with an 8-residue loop. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 1027–1033 (1995).
Landis, C. & Allured, V. S. Elucidation of solution structures by conformer population analysis of NOE data. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113, 9493–9499 (1991).
Meissner, A., Duus, J. Ø. & Sørensen, O. W. Spin-state-selective excitation. Application for E.COSY-type measurement of JHH coupling constants. J. Magn. Res. 128, 92–97 (1997).
Kiraly, P. et al. Single-scan selective excitation of individual NMR signals in overlapping multiplets. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 666–669 (2021).
Rabenstein, D. L. & Kaerner, A. Simulating NMR spectra — gNMR. Anal. Chem. 69, A302–A303 (1997).
Cobas, C. NMR signal processing, prediction, and structure verification with machine learning techniques. Magn. Reson. Chem. 58, 512–519 (2020).
Ruddigkeit, L., van Deursen, R., Blum, L. C. & Reymond, J.-L. Enumeration of 166 billion organic small molecules in the chemical universe database GDB-17. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52, 2864–2875 (2012).
Butts, C. P. et al. Interproton distance determinations by NOE — surprising accuracy and precision in a rigid organic molecule. Org. Biomol. Chem. 9, 177–184 (2011). This paper discusses the accuracy of NOE measurements.
Krishna, N. R., Agresti, D. G., Glickson, J. D. & Walter, R. Solution conformation of peptides by intra-molecular nuclear Overhauser effect experiment — study of valinomycin-K+. Biophys. J. 24, 791–814 (1978).
Noggle, J. H. & Schirmer, R. E. in The Nuclear Overhauser Effect (eds Noggle, J. H. & Schirmer, R. E.) 113–124 (Academic, 1971).
Noggle, J. H. & Schirmer, R. E. in The Nuclear Overhauser Effect (eds Noggle, J. H. & Schirmer, R. E.) 76–95 (Academic, 1971).
Wieske, L. H. E. & Erdélyi, M. Non-uniform sampling for NOESY? A case study on spiramycin. Magn. Reson. Chem. 59, 723–737 (2021). The paper discusses the detrimental effects of non-uniform sampling on NOESY spectra.
Jones, C. R., Butts, C. P. & Harvey, J. N. Accuracy in determining interproton distances using nuclear Overhauser effect data from a flexible molecule. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 7, 145–150 (2011).
Macura, S., Farmer, B. T. & Brown, L. R. An improved method for the determination of cross-relaxation rates from NOE data. J. Magn. Res. 70, 493–499 (1986).
Macura, S., Huang, Y., Suter, D. & Ernst, R. R. Two-dimensional chemical exchange and cross-relaxation spectroscopy of coupled nuclear spins. J. Magn. Res. 43, 259–281 (1981).
Claridge, T. D. W. High Resolution NMR Techniques in Organic Chemistry 3rd edn, 327 (Elsevier, 2016).
Claridge, T. D. W. High Resolution NMR Techniques in Organic Chemistry 3rd edn, 315–380 (Elsevier, 2016).
Neuhaus, D. & Williamson, M. The Nuclear Overhauser Effect in Structural and Conformational Analysis 2nd edn, 111–117 (Wiley-VCH, 2000).
Kessler, H., Oschkinat, H., Griesinger, C. & Bermel, W. Transformation of homonuclear two-dimensional NMR techniques into one-dimensional techniques using Gaussian pulses. J. Magn. Reson. 70, 106–133 (1986).
Kumar, A., Wagner, G., Ernst, R. R. & Wuthrich, K. Buildup rates of the nuclear Overhauser effect measured by two-dimensional proton magnetic-resonance spectroscopy — implications for studies of protein conformation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 103, 3654–3658 (1981).
Hu, H. T. & Krishnamurthy, K. Revisiting the initial rate approximation in kinetic NOE measurements. J. Magn. Res. 182, 173–177 (2006).
Esposito, G. & Pastore, A. An alternative method for distance evaluation from NOESY spectra. J. Magn. Res. 76, 331–336 (1988).
Farmer, B. T., Macura, S. & Brown, L. R. The effect of molecular motion on cross relaxation in the laboratory and rotating frames. J. Magn. Res. 80, 1–22 (1988).
Bax, A. & Davis, D. G. Practical aspects of two-dimensional transverse NOE spectroscopy. J. Magn. Res. 63, 207–213 (1985).
Claridge, T. D. W. High Resolution NMR Techniques in Organic Chemistry 3rd edn, 354–355 (Elsevier, 2016).
Ammalahti, E., Bardet, M., Molko, D. & Cadet, J. Evaluation of distances from ROESY experiments with the intensity-ratio method. J. Magn. Reson. Ser. A 122, 230–232 (1996).
Thiele, C. M., Petzold, K. & Schleucher, J. EASY ROESY: reliable cross-peak integration in adiabatic symmetrized ROESY. Chem. Eur. J. 15, 585–588 (2009).
Ilgen, J., Nowag, J., Kaltschnee, L., Schmidts, V. & Thiele, C. M. Gradient selected pure shift EASY-ROESY techniques facilitate the quantitative measurement of H-1,H-1-distance restraints in congested spectral regions. J. Magn. Reson. 324, 1069000 (2021).
Prochazkova, E. et al. Uncovering key structural features of an enantioselective peptide-catalyzed acylation utilizing advanced NMR techniques. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 15754–15759 (2016).
Adams, R. W. Pure shift NMR spectroscopy. eMagRes 3, 1–15 (2014).
Chini, M. G. et al. Quantitative NMR-derived interproton distances combined with quantum mechanical calculations of C-13 chemical shifts in the stereochemical determination of conicasterol F, a nuclear receptor ligand from Theonella swinhoei. J. Org. Chem. 77, 1489–1496 (2012).
Imtiaz, S. & Ali, S. M. Atom accurate structure determination of alprazolam/cyclodextrin inclusion complexes by ROESY and computational approaches. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 99, 100299 (2022).
Levy, R. M., Karplus, M. & McCammon, J. A. Increase of carbon-13 NMR relaxation times in proteins due to picosecond motional averaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 103, 994–996 (1981).
Levy, R. M., Karplus, M. & Wolynes, P. G. NMR relaxation parameters in molecules with internal motion: exact langevin trajectory results compared with simplified relaxation models. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 103, 5998–6011 (1981).
McCain, D. C. & Markley, J. L. Rotational spectral density functions for aqueous sucrose: experimental determination using carbon-13 NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 108, 4259–4264 (1986).
McCain, D. C. & Markley, J. L. Internal motions of the three hydroxymethyl groups in aqueous sucrose. J. Magn. Res. 73, 244–251 (1987).
McKay, R. T. Annual Rep. NMR Spectr. Vol. 66, 33–76 (Academic, 2009).
Howe, P. W. A. Suppression of protonated organic solvents in NMR spectroscopy using a perfect echo low-pass filtration pulse sequence. Anal. Chem. 90, 4316–4319 (2018).
Claridge, T. D. W. High Resolution NMR Techniques in Organic Chemistry 3rd edn, 380–386 (Elsevier, 2016).
Piotto, M., Saudek, V. & Sklenar, V. Gradient-tailored excitation for single-quantum NMR spectroscopy of aqueous solutions. J. Biomol. NMR 2, 661–665 (1992).
Hwang, T. L. & Shaka, A. J. Water suppression that works — excitation sculpting using arbitrary wave-forms and pulsed-field gradients. J. Magn. Reson. Ser. A 112, 275–279 (1995).
Adams, R. W., Holroyd, C. M., Aguilar, J. A., Nilsson, M. & Morris, G. A. ‘Perfecting’ WATERGATE: clean proton NMR spectra from aqueous solution. Chem. Commun. 49, 358–360 (2013).
Simpson, A. J. & Brown, S. A. Purge NMR: effective and easy solvent suppression. J. Magn. Reson. 175, 340–346 (2005).
Nichols, P. J. et al. Reducing the measurement time of exact NOEs by non-uniform sampling. J. Biomol. NMR 74, 717–739 (2020).
Andersen, N. H., Eaton, H. L. & Lai, X. Quantitative small molecule NOESY — a practical guide for derivation of cross-relaxation rates and internuclear distances. Magn. Reson. Chem. 27, 515–528 (1989).
Andersen, N. H., Nguyen, K. T., Hartzell, C. J. & Eaton, H. L. Rapid acquisition of the NOE difference spectra — the relative mertis of transient versus driven experimental protocols. J. Magn. Res. 74, 195–211 (1987).
Cobas, C. Applications of the Whittaker smoother in NMR spectroscopy. Magn. Reson. Chem. 56, 1140–1148 (2018).
Neuhaus, D. & Williamson, M. The Nuclear Overhauser Effect in Structural and Conformational Analysis 1st edn, 294–296 (Wiley-VCH, 1989).
Claridge, T. D. W. High Resolution NMR Techniques in Organic Chemistry 3rd edn, 345 (Elsevier, 2016).
Neuhaus, D. & Williamson, M. The Nuclear Overhauser Effect in Structural and Conformational Analysis 2nd edn, 493–499 (Wiley-VCH, 2000).
Koos, M. R. M., Schulz, K. H. G. & Gil, R. R. Reference-free NOE NMR analysis. Chem. Sci. 11, 9930–9936 (2020).
Hawkins, P. C. D. Conformation generation: the state of the art. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 57, 1747–1756 (2017).
Nevins, N., Cicero, D. & Snyder, J. P. A test of the single-conformation hypothesis in the analysis of NMR data for small polar molecules: a force field comparison. J. Org. Chem. 64, 3979–3986 (1999). This study demonstrates that ensembles cannot be represented by a single conformer and that computed energies are not reliable enough to be used in ensemble determination.
Spellmeyer, D. C., Wong, A. K., Bower, M. J. & Blaney, J. M. Conformational analysis using distance geometry methods. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 15, 18–36 (1997).
Chang, G., Guida, W. C. & Still, W. C. An internal coordinate Monte-Carlo method for searching conformational space. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111, 4379–4386 (1989).
Hawkins, P. C. D. Conformation generation: the state of the art. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 57, 1747–1756 (2017).
Chang, G., Guida, W. C. & Still, W. C. An internal-coordinate Monte Carlo method for searching conformational space. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111, 4379–4386 (1989).
Olanders, G., Alogheli, H., Brandt, P. & Karlen, A. Conformational analysis of macrocycles: comparing general and specialized methods. J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des. 34, 231–252 (2020).
Supady, A., Blum, V. & Baldauf, C. First-principles molecular structure search with a genetic algorithm. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 55, 2338–2348 (2015).
Ämmälahti, E., Bardet, M., Molko, D. & Cadet, J. Evaluation of distances from ROESY experiments with the intensity-ratio method. J. Magn. Res. 122, 230–232 (1996).
Cleves, A. E. & Jain, A. N. ForceGen 3D structure and conformer generation: from small lead-like molecules to macrocyclic drugs. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 31, 419–439 (2017).
Beckers, M. L. M., Buydens, L. M. C., Pikkemaat, J. A. & Altona, C. Application of a genetic algorithm in the conformational analysis of methylene-acetal-linked thymine dimers in DNA: comparison with distance geometry calculations. J. Biomol. NMR 9, 25–34 (1997).
Harish, B., Swapna, G. V. T., Kornhaber, G. J., Montelione, G. T. & Carey, J. Multiple helical conformations of the helix–turn–helix region revealed by NOE-restrained MD simulations of tryptophan aporepressor, TrpR. Proteins 85, 731–740 (2017).
Immel, S., Kock, M. & Reggelin, M. NMR-based configurational assignments of natural products: Gibbs sampling and Bayesian inference using floating chirality distance geometry calculations. Mar. Drugs 20, 14 (2022).
Nardini, V., Dias, L. G., Palaretti, V. & da Silva, G. V. J. Citronellal assumes a folded conformation in solution due to dispersion interactions: a joint NMR-DFT analysis. J. Mol. Struct. 1157, 401–407 (2018).
Aliev, A. E. & Sinitsyna, A. A. Modified Karplus equations and their stereochemical applications. Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Chem. Sci. 41, 1143–1160 (1992).
Li, F., Lee, J. H., Grishaev, A., Ying, J. F. & Bax, A. High accuracy of Karplus equations for relating three-bond J couplings to protein backbone torsion angles. Chem. Phys. Chem. 16, 572–578 (2015).
Wu, A. A. & Crerner, D. Extension of the Karplus relationship for NMR spin–spin coupling constants to nonplanar ring systems: pseudorotation of tetrahydrofuran. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 4, 158–192 (2003).
Friden-Saxin, M. et al. Proline-mediated formation of novel chroman-4-one tetrahydropyrimidines. Tetrahedron 68, 7035–7040 (2012).
Jogalekar, A. S. et al. Dictyostatin flexibility bridges conformations in solution and in the β-tubulin taxane binding site. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 2427–2436 (2011).
Thepchatri, P. et al. Conformations of laulimalide in DMSO-d6. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 12838–12846 (2005).
Evans, D. A., Bodkin, M. J., Baker, S. R. & Sharman, G. J. Janocchio — a Java applet for viewing 3D structures and calculating NMR couplings and NOEs. Magn. Reson. Chem. 45, 595–600 (2007).
Lai, X. N., Chen, C. P. & Andersen, N. H. The DISCON algorithm, an accurate and robust alternative to an eigenvalue solution for extracting experimental distances from NOESY data. J. Magn. Res. B 101, 271–288 (1993).
Atasoylu, O., Furst, G., Risatti, C. & Smith, A. B. The solution structure of (+)-spongistatin 1 in DMSO. Org. Lett. 12, 1788–1791 (2010).
Ludvigsen, S., Andersen, K. V. & Poulsen, F. M. Accurate measurements of coupling-constants from two-dimensional nucelar magnetic resonance spectra of proteins and determination of φ-angles. J. Mol. Biol. 217, 731–736 (1991).
Schmieder, P. & Kessler, H. Determination of the ϕ angle in a peptide backbone by NMR spectroscopy with a combination of homonuclear and heteronuclear coupling-constants. Biopolymers 32, 435–440 (1992).
Aydin, R. & Günther, H. 13C, 1H spin–spin coupling. X—norbornane: a reinvestigation of the Karplus curve for 3J(13C, 1H). Magn. Reson. Chem. 28, 448–457 (1990).
Tvaroska, I. & Taravel, F. R. in Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry Vol. 51 (ed. Horton, D.) 15–61 (Academic, 1995).
PCMODEL V 8.5 Molecular Modeling Software for Windows Operating System, Apple Macintosh OS, Linux and Unix (Serena Software, 2003).
Vainio, M. J. & Johnson, M. S. Generating conformer ensembles using a multiobjective genetic algorithm. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 47, 2462–2474 (2007).
Erdelyi, M. et al. Conformational preferences of natural and C3-modified epothilones in aqueous solution. J. Med. Chem. 51, 1469–1473 (2008).
Umerweneza, D. et al. Macrocyclic pyrrolizidine alkaloids and silphiperfolanol angelate esters from Solanecio mannii. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 26, e202201280 (2022).
Efron, B. The Jackknife, the Bootstrap, and Other Resampling Plans (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1987).
Goodman, J. M. & Still, W. C. An unbounded systematic search of conformational space. J. Comput. Chem. 12, 1110–1117 (1991).
Saunders, M. Stochastic search for the conformations of bicyclic hydrocarbons. J. Comput. Chem. 10, 203–208 (1989).
Danelius, E. et al. Dynamic chirality in the mechanism of action of allosteric CD36 modulators of macrophage-driven inflammation. J. Med. Chem. 62, 11071–11079 (2019).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank S. Wlodek (OpenEye) for giving us early access to NMR_FIT, O. Atasoylu for his help with DISCON, and P. Monje and A. Navarro-Vazquez for their guidance with StereoFitter. The authors are grateful to J. Bogaerts and A. Demkiv for their Linux support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to all aspects of the article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Chemistry thanks Beat Vögeli and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
This Review is dedicated to the memory of Professor Adolf Gogoll (1957–2023).
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Related links
OpenEye Scientific: https://www.eyesopen.com/
Supplementary information
Glossary
- Initial-rate approximation
-
The assumption that the nuclear Overhauser effect observed at short mixing times, in the linear regime of the build-up curve, is proportional to the interproton distance.
- Longitudinal relaxation
-
The time needed for a given spin to fall back to equilibrium. Also known as spin–lattice relaxation.
- Mixing time
-
The time delay in the nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) spectroscopy pulse sequence during which cross-relaxation occurs, giving rise to the NOE. Within the linear build-up regime, the longer the mixing time, the more time is given for the magnetization to transfer between spins, resulting in stronger NOE cross peaks.
- NOE build-up curves
-
Series of nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) experiments with at least four mixing times recorded to determine the NOE build-up rate, which is the rate of NOE signal evolution. At short enough mixing times, the intensity of the NOE cross peaks linearly correlates to the mixing time, and the slope of the signal build-ups provides population-averaged interproton distances.
- Non-uniform sampling
-
A way of recording 2D NMR spectra whereby only a subset of increments (number of points in the f1 dimension) is collected, and the missing increments need to be reconstructed before Fourier transform.
- Nuclear Overhauser effect
-
(NOE). A through-space dipole–dipole interaction between spins; the magnitude of the effect depends on the distance separation of the spins, among other factors.
- Rotating-frame Overhauser effect spectroscopy
-
(ROESY). A variation of the nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy sequence with the difference that the signals of a ROESY are always positive, independent of the correlation time and spectrometer frequency.
- Solution ensembles
-
Collection of different conformations a molecule adopts in solution.
- Solvent suppression
-
A pulse or pulse combination used with the aim of removing a strong solvent signal from a spectrum, to avoid overloading of the analogue-to-digital converter (ADC).
- t 1 noise
-
Noise visible in 2D spectra along the indirect (f1) axis owing to too few increments, resulting in a truncated free induction delay, and after Fourier transformation, manifesting as wiggles in the baseline; most commonly seen at intense singlets within a spectrum. To a certain extent, it can be compensated with weighting functions.
- T 2 relaxation
-
Process by which the transverse components of magnetization dephase, causing the signal intensity to exponentially decay. The time constant T2 is the time required for the transverse magnetization to fall to ~37% (1/e) of its initial value.
- Total correlation spectroscopy
-
(TOCSY). A homonuclear experiment that allows for the detection of covalently connected spins but is not restricted to the closest neighbours.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wieske, L.H.E., Peintner, S. & Erdélyi, M. Ensemble determination by NMR data deconvolution. Nat Rev Chem 7, 511–524 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-023-00494-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-023-00494-x
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
NMR deconvolution in the blink of an AI
Nature Reviews Chemistry (2023)