Abstract
One of the leading causes of wound healing delays is bacterial infection, which limits the process of restoring the histological and functional integrity of the skin. Electrospun nanofibrous materials (ENMs) are biocompatible and biodegradable, and they can provide specific physical, chemical, and biological cues to accelerate wound healing. Based on this fact, a series of multifunctional ENMs for complex clinical applications, particularly infected skin injuries, have been developed. Antibiotics, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), metals and metal oxides (MMOs), and antibacterial polymers have previously been incorporated into ENMs through advanced material processing techniques, endowing ENMs with enhanced and excellent antibacterial activity. This review summarizes wound healing issues and provides recent advances in antibacterial ENMs created by cutting-edge technology. The future of clinical and translational research on ENMs is also discussed.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Skin is the human body’s largest organ, which plays a vital role in regulating the internal physiological environment, such as maintaining body temperature, resisting bacterial infection, reducing the loss of water and electrolytes, and facilitating the growth of hair as well as the sweat gland [1]. The histological components and structures of the skin include the epidermis, dermis, and subcutaneous tissue. Figure 1a shows that the hair follicles, sweat glands, sebaceous glands, and thermoreceptors exist in the dermis [2]. There are abundant arterial–venous interactions between the dermis and adjacent subcutaneous tissue, which are essential for maintaining homeostasis and body temperature [3]. For diabetic patients, persistent hyperglycemia can lead to the destruction of the histological structure and dysfunction of blood vessels, which eventually results in diabetic foot and chronic wounds [4]. The regenerative time as well as the quality of wound healing are highly correlated with wound size. As presented in Fig. 1b, the skin can be irregularly divided into nine areas for primitively measuring the wound size [2]. This model has been widely applied for clinical diagnosis and treatment.
A cutaneous wound is defined as any break in the skin’s structural and functional integrity, and skin injuries occur by a series of factors, such as external force tearing, skin tumors, burning, and endocrine disorders [5, 6]. For instance, force-induced skin injury is characterized by acute bleeding and destruction of tissue integrity (Fig. 1c). Melanomas can be surgically resected. However, it inevitably leads to a large area of full-thickness skin defects. Burning is the most serious type of skin injury, and it is classified into four distinct degrees (Fig. 1d, e) [7]. Septicemia and hypovolemic shock prevention are critical factors in improving the survival rate of severe burn patients [8]. Diabetic foot is characterized by diabetes microangiopathy, persistent bacterial infection, and skin tissue necrosis [9]. As presented in Fig. 1f, the mechanism of the diabetic foot has not been thoroughly discovered [10], and the treatment of diabetic foot is still a great clinical challenge. It is still difficult to realize satisfactory results with standardized, comprehensive, and whole-course interventions. Based on actual technology conditions, tissue engineering wound dressings have emerged as a potential pathway for the treatment of diabetic foot, and a series of multifunctional and stimulus-responsive wound dressings have been developed [11].
To facilitate diagnosis and treatment, a clinical criterion (Fig. 1g) has been proposed to assess the severity of skin injury [12]. The treatments for skin injury include removing the primary causes (sharp tools, hyperglycemia, heat source, and chemical reagents), stopping bleeding, cleaning the wound site, preventing bacterial infection, and eliminating other hazardous factors [8]. Wound dressings (WDs) are commonly used for accelerating wound healing. The traditional view that a dry environment is conducive to wound healing has been overturned by advanced tissue engineering theory and clinical practice [13]. An advanced WD can maintain a moist microenvironment (MME) at the wounded site and thus promote vascularization and re-epithelialization as well as the synthesis of collagen fibers. On the other hand, the WDs can also serve as carriers of other bioactive components, such as seeding cells, exosomes, recombinant proteins, and small molecule inhibitors [14, 15]. Currently, the development of advanced WDs can be divided into electrospinning nanofibrous materials (ENMs), biomolecular hydrogels, porous sponges, 3D printing scaffolds, etc. [16].
ENMs are light and flexible and fit well with wrinkled skin and even sports joints [17]. ENMs with a penetrating network structure can simulate the extracellular matrix (ECM) of natural skin and support the adhesion and growth of host cells. To accelerate wound healing, the biocompatibility, biodegradation, and bioactivity of ENMs can be precisely designed by modulating the chemical compositions and physical structure (diameter, surface roughness, hydrophobicity, orientation degree, etc.) [18,19,20]. Meanwhile, ENMs have a relatively large specific surface area, which is convenient for chemical and functional modifications. As a result, ENMs exhibit great advantages over other types of WDs. Advanced ENMs with desirable antibacterial, antioxidant, angiogenic, and hemostatic properties have recently received considerable attention [21,22,23]. In this review, we focus on antibacterial ENMs and provide a comprehensive summary of the clinical requirements, preparations, modifications, and antibacterial strategies of ENMs. The clinical efficacy, safety, and fundamental mechanisms of various antibacterial strategies are also highlighted to provide a bench-to-bedside perspective on medical device approval. Finally, we discuss the current challenges and future prospects for antibacterial ENMs.
Clinical Requirements of Wound Dressings
An ideal WD should have specific bioactivity that matches the dynamic process of wound healing. As shown in Fig. 2a, the wound healing process can be divided into four complex and overlapping phases, including hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling [24]. In particular, a series of host cells, inflammatory factors, physiochemical cues, and cellular signal transduction pathways may be involved in this complex process, resulting in the orderly and effective progress of wound healing [25]. Some WDs have the ability to stop bleeding and induce the sustained release of various bioactive factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and platelet-derived growth factor (FDGF), thereby accelerating the physiological wound-healing process. [26]. Notably, the types and doses of bioactive factors required for wound healing markedly vary among phases. Thus, researchers have developed an intelligent strategy for the time-dependent release of two or more bioactive factors [27]. WD can also remodel the pathological process caused by hazardous internal/external factors, especially bacterial infection.
External bacteria migrate to the wound site as soon as the injury occurs and rapidly multiply in a moist and warm microenvironment made up of cell debris, blood clots, and tissue exudations [28]. Local bacterial infection is one of the most common causes of suppuration, ulceration, and delayed wound healing. Local bacteria can also spread into the blood and induce systemic sepsis [29]. The skin has an effective self-defense system in which immune cells with chemotaxis play a key role, as shown in Fig. 2b. Immune cells eliminate pathogens by phagocytizing pathogens, presenting antigens to start adaptive immunity, and remodeling the wound microenvironment (WME) by secreting a series of bioactive factors [30]. The biological function of immune cells is phased during the wound healing process [31, 32]. For example, M1 macrophages can promote inflammatory responses, clear necrotic tissue, and remodel the WME in the early stage of wound healing. M2 macrophages replace M1 macrophages in the middle and late stages, promoting host cell proliferation and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling. Currently, it is of increasing interest to accurately regulate the type, quantity, and biological function of immune cells in the wound healing process.
Antibacterial properties are the fundamental clinical requirements for WDs. The history of antibacterial WDs can be traced back to the first linseed oil and phenol-loaded bandage developed by Joseph Lister et al. [33]. The applications of sulfonamides in 1935 were a great success in preventing bacterial infection. However, the extensive application of antibiotics can lead to drug resistance [34]. The appearance of novel drug-resistant bacterial strains has forced researchers to develop new antibiotics, such as vancomycin, thiomycin, tetracycline, and quinolones. Meanwhile, nonantibiotic reagents have also been developed, and metal and metal oxides (MMO), such as Ag, Cu, ZnO, TiO2, and Fe3O4, exhibit excellent antibacterial activity [35]. Synthetic and natural antibacterial polymers have excellent biocompatibility and processability and have potential applicability in fabricating complex WDs. In recent decades, several antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [36]. With the help of cutting-edge technology, researchers can easily screen out bacteria-specific or bacteria-targeted AMPs to address major public health events, such as the prevalence of superbacteria [37, 38].
Currently, the development of antibacterial WDs requires a higher standard, especially for chronic wound management, because the four usual phases of wound healing (hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling) fail to follow this regular procedure to complete coverage (frequently in the inflammatory phase), and the wounds fail to progress toward healing within 4 weeks. All chronic wounds should be treated as if they are contaminated with bacteria, and the degree of wound bioburden is an important element in deciding whether a wound can heal. Reducing the bioburden in all wounds is an important part of wound bed preparation and individualizing treatment for each wound [39, 40]. Not all surface bacteria cause illness or even contribute to the chronicity of a lesion. Planktonic bacteria are not bound together and must adhere to the wound’s surface similar to microorganisms connected as a biofilm. Standard microbiological swabbing for culture and sensitivity of wound bacteria may result in the identification of a species that is not harmful, and hence, treatment may not promote healing. Biofilms contribute to the wound’s bioburden, and the degree of wound bioburden is an important element in deciding whether the wound can heal. Reducing the bioburden in each wound is an important part of wound bed preparation and individualizing therapy for each lesion [41, 42]. The combination of debridement and wound dressing appears to be an effective strategy for treating biofilms. For example, once a specific bacterial species or combination has been identified, debridement is needed, followed by repeated surgical debridement during follow-up visits until contamination in the wound has been reduced to an acceptable level. Debridement dissolves biofilm structures, exposing constituent microorganisms and increasing the effectiveness of treatment drugs when the biofilm regrows [42]. Antibacterial ENMs are applied to the wound sites after debridement and can significantly improve wound healing efficiency.
Prevention and control of bacterial drug resistance remain arduous tasks. Topical antimicrobials can minimize contamination in a wound, but are ineffective against invasive infections; in general, they should not be used for more than 2 weeks. As an anti-infective, several dressings contain antimicrobials, and most demonstrate efficacy in laboratory tests; however, clinical efficacy is proven to be less evident. Because of their low cytotoxicity at high concentrations, topical antibiotics are appealing. Topical administration can deliver extremely high concentrations with minimal systemic absorption and potential toxicity. However, due to concerns about antibiotic resistance, treatments should be limited to two weeks [43]. In recent years, the inflammatory response induced by dead bacteria has attracted considerable attention. As shown in Fig. 2c, the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) released by dead gram-negative bacteria can act on the TLR4/MD receptor complex to upregulate the inflammatory response and reactive oxygen species (ROS) [44, 45]. As a result, there is an urgent need for WD with antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activity. To meet the requirements of a clinically complex application, antibacterial WDs should also incorporate additional biological functions, such as immunity regulation, ROS scavenging, angiogenesis promotion, and induction of hair follicle and sweat gland regeneration [46]. A hypertrophic scar inevitably easily forms after wound healing, which seriously affects wound regeneration. The absence of hair follicles and sweat glands in large scar tissue also leads to the dysfunction of thermoregulation. Mascharak et al. revealed the molecular mechanism of the Engrailed-1 gene in scar formation and screened out a selective anti-scar antagonist (Verteporfin) [47]. Kim et al. inversely differentiated precursor cells into hair follicle stem cells and successfully realized hair follicle regeneration [48]. Fu et al., the academician from the Chinese Academy of Engineering (CAE), proposed the concept of inducing sweat gland regeneration worldwide [49]. In the future, more fundamental research achievements are expected to improve the prognosis of wound healing.
Processing of Antibacterial ENMs
As presented in Fig. 3a, electrospun nanofibrous materials (ENMs) have a long history of research and development (R&D) [50]. Since 2020, the production capacity of ENMs, one of the important raw materials for medical masks, has rapidly grown [51]. Figure 3b shows an optical picture of a desktop high-voltage electrospinning device (HVED). Research grade HVED has been fully localized in China, greatly reducing the purchase and maintenance costs. As presented in Fig. 3c, the basic HVED is composed of a high-voltage power supply, peristaltic pump, sample chamber and needle, negatively charged receiver, and conductive wire [52, 53]. Advanced HVED will also be equipped with a light source, motion module, temperature and humidity controller, etc. The HVED can be conveniently modified by the demand. For example, the core/shell structure of ENMs can be fabricated using a multichannel needle instead of a traditional single-channel needle [54]. The flat plate receiver is replaced by the roller receiver device to prepare nanofibers with different orientations [55].
The principle of electrospinning technology is explained as follows. The high-voltage power supply forms a strong electric field environment between the anode and cathode, driving the electrospinning solution to spray from the needle to the receiver. In this process, the electrospinning solvent rapidly volatilizes, and the solute solidifies to form nanofibers. The diameter and orientation of ENMs are deeply affected by the types of raw materials and parameters of solvents, voltage, electrode distance, temperature and humidity, the rotation rate of the receiver, and other factors [56]. As shown in Table 1, the raw materials of ENMs are mainly synthetic polymers, including polycaprolactone (PCL), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), polylactic acid (PLA), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), etc. PCL and PLGA have relatively good biosafety and biodegradability in vivo and are the favorite electrospun synthetic polymers. Natural polymers are generally not spinnable and can be blended with synthetic polymers to be effectively electrospun. Representative natural polymers include chitosan (CS), silk fibroin (SF), and soybean protein isolate (SPI); however, most natural polymers do not have antibacterial activity except for CS. Fortunately, natural polymers are rich in chemically modifiable groups, and their antibacterial activity can be effectively tuned by chemical modifications [53, 57].
The solvents of ENMs can be distilled water, hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP), dichloromethane, N,N-dimethylformamide, chloroform, dimethyl sulfoxide, and their mixtures [71]. HFIP is a strong polar organic solvent with strong solubility and easy volatilization; thus, it has relatively low requirements for ambient temperature and humidity [72]. Because HFIP has a strong corrosivity to the eyes, skin, and respiratory mucosa, it should be handled with caution. Appropriate high voltage and electrode distance parameters are critical for the successful preparation of ENMs. In general, with a higher voltage and a smaller electrode distance, a greater electric field and a smaller average ENM diameter can be achieved. Increasing the electric field strength will shorten the flight time of liquid flow, and the solvent may not be fully volatilized and sprayed over the receiver.
The structures and properties of neat ENMs are relatively simple, making it difficult to fully meet the clinical needs of wound healing. As shown in Fig. 3d, researchers have designed and developed a series of physical and chemical methods to endow ENMs with specific biological functions [73]. Coaxial electrospinning is used to fabricate ENMs with shell–core structures, realizing inner and outer materials with different components. The shell and core layers can be also loaded with different bioactive factors as well as the faster release dynamics of the shell layer. Therefore, coaxial electrospinning is widely used to prepare intelligent drug-release materials. Chemical immobilization is used to immobilize active components, such as antibacterial peptides (AMPs), enzymes, and bioactive factors, onto the surface of nanofibers through a chemical cross-linking strategy [74]. The chemical cross-linking reaction is always performed under physiological conditions to avoid damaging the structure and function of the bioactive component. For the layer-by-layer (LBL) assembly technique driven by electrostatic attractions, the ENM is immersed alternately in polymer solutions with opposite charges [75]. Polyelectrolyte complexes form via electrostatic interactions and are then deposited on the surface of the ENMs.
Advanced ENMs feature complex microstructures and components. In general, a scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) is used to observe the morphology and elementary compositions of the surface of ENMs. However, SEM is not suitable for in-deep analysis. Zhou et al. applied a transmission electron microscope (TEM) to identify coaxial ENMs [76]. The shell or core layers of coaxial ENMs can be loaded with uranium acetate and phosphotungstic acid to improve the contrast ratio of TEM. The infrared spectrum (IR) and X-ray diffraction spectrum (XRD) can be used to characterize the chemical composition. Tensile strength and hydrophobicity are also vital physical properties of ENMs and can be tested by a universal material testing machine and a dynamic video capture system, respectively. The biocompatibility of ENMs is strictly supervised. In the scope of wound healing, several model cells, including mouse lung fibroblasts (L929), mouse embryonic fibroblasts (NIH/3T3), human dermal fibroblasts (HDF), and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), are widely used for biocompatibility and bioactivity evaluations in vitro. Meanwhile, Wang et al. also constructed an abdominal transplantation model for comprehensive evaluations in vivo [77].
As shown in Fig. 3e, the applications of functional ENMs include heart patches, artificial tendons, bone repair membranes, and wound dressings [73]. Of note, the antibacterial ENMs have achieved good efficacy in various complex applications such as full-thickness skin defects, infectious skin defects, and even diabetic foot. The number of published papers in the field of antibacterial ENMs has significantly increased since 2014, as shown in Fig. 3f, and the global volume of wound dressings will reach US $20.4 billion by 2021 [78]. Based on the clinical need, we assume that high-performance antibacterial ENMs will have great commercial value.
Antibacterial Strategies of the ENMs
Antibiotics
Antibiotics, produced by microorganisms, are divided into seven groups, including β-lactam, macrolide, aminoglycoside, tetracycline, lincomycin, chloramphenicol, and antimicrobial peptide [79]. Antibiotics eliminate bacteria by inhibiting the biosynthesis of biomass, such as cell walls, protein, DNA, and RNA, increasing the permeability of cell membranes, and intervening in bacterial folate metabolism [80]. Due to the abuse of antibiotics, some specific bacteria have evolved inactivating enzymes for antibiotics. Under strong selection pressure, mutant bacteria proliferate in large numbers, leading to the failure of anti-infection treatment [81]. In this context, the medical community has suggested a call for the rational use of antibiotics and strictly supervising the prescription authority. The formation of biofilms is also one of the critical factors for drug resistance. A series of tissue engineering wound dressings (TEWDs) can eliminate bacterial biofilms and thus significantly improve their antibacterial effect [82, 83]. In the clinic, appropriate antibiotics are selected based on the results of drug susceptibility tests.
As shown in Table 2, extensive antibiotic-loaded ENMs have been developed to address the challenges brought by bacterial drug resistance. These antibacterial ENMs are sufficient to kill most drug-resistant bacteria. They have the advantages of local administration, reduced dosage, and avoiding systemic toxicity. Nevertheless, new antibiotics and composited ENMs are still being developed to kill emerging drug-resistant bacteria. Skin tissue engineering (STE) focuses on loading antibiotics onto nanofibers through advanced material processing technology and the application effect of the products. Currently, dozens of types of antibiotic-loaded ENMs, such as ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, erythromycin, doxycycline, and vancomycin, have been reported. Vancomycin is a powerful glycopeptide antibiotic that is used alone or in combination with other antibiotics to treat severe infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [84]. Vancomycin is considered the last line of defense against bacterial infection. Vancomycin is also listed as a special antibacterial drug in the “Notice of the General Office of the Ministry of Health on Further Strengthening the Management of Clinical Application of Antibiotics”, and its clinical application is strictly supervised.
The key to the fabrication of antibiotic-loaded ENMs is to accurately regulate the sustained-release performance of antibiotics. To solve this problem, researchers have extensively attempted to optimize the substrates of ENMs and the encapsulation of antibiotics. Hydrophilic substrates, such as gelatin, chitosan, and silk fibroin, are conducive to the rapid release of antibiotics, while hydrophobic substrates, such as PCL, PLGA, and PLA, are conducive to the long-term sustained release of antibiotics. The drug-release performance of the antibiotic-loaded ENMs can be facilely manipulated by adjusting the type, weight ratio, and physical state of hydrophilic and hydrophobic substrates. Antibiotics are mainly loaded onto ENMs by the blending electrospinning technique and then released via a simple diffusion process. Thus, the inhibition zone test is widely used to evaluate the antibacterial activity of antibiotic-loaded ENMs [85]. Antibiotic-loaded ENMs have different degrees of burst release in the early stage, which may lead to excessive local drug concentrations and potential side effects. To reduce burst release, a feasible method is to increase the proportion of hydrophobic substrate, which will greatly prolong the overall release time. Another method is to prepare ENMs with a shell–core structure by coaxial electrospinning technology. The antibiotics in the core layer are shielded by the outer shell structure to delay the release dynamics [67].
Antimicrobial Peptides
In 1980, Boman et al. discovered the first antimicrobial peptide (AMP) and named it cecropin [36]. In the following decades, more than 3000 AMPs have been reported. AMPs are a special type of antibiotic that are usually composed of 6–50 amino acid residues. [105]. The structures of several types of AMP are shown in Fig. 4a. The secondary structure of AMP includes α-helical and β-sheet, which forms the functional basis of antibacterial activity. As shown in Fig. 4b, AMPs are diverse. Classical α-helical AMPs are common in nature, and their hydrophilic and hydrophobic amino acids are distributed at both ends of the molecular chain. A few α-helical AMPs, whose hydrophilic and hydrophobic amino acids are located on both sides of the a-spiral wall, have also been found [106]. Of note, a small number of AMPs, such as nisin, do not have secondary structure [107]. AMPs can be isolated from bacteria, fungi, insects, mammalian cells, and even human-derived cells. AMPs can be easily prepared and purified by solid-phase organic synthesis if the primary sequence of the AMP is discovered. In recent decades, library-based screening technology for high-throughput screening of potential AMPs has been developed. For example, Peter’t Hart et al. used the phage display library to screen a series of phages targeting lipid II and then used gene sequencing to obtain a series of AMPs on Gram-positive bacteria. [108]. The diversity of the library is sufficient to identify all potential pathogens. Therefore, library-based screening technology is expected to be one of the most powerful weapons to deal with superbacterial infection.
The mechanism of AMPs includes membrane translocation and membrane perturbation [36]. As shown in Fig. 4c, some AMPs can be transported into the cell membrane and interfere with the biosynthesis of bacterial DNA, RNA, and protein, as well as protein folding. Another AMP can destroy the integrity of the cell membrane, including three typical approaches: barrel stave, carpet, and toroidal pore. As shown in Fig. 4d, the AMPs may also have complex physiological functions in the wound healing process, such as promotion of NETs, recruitment and polarization of T cells, neutralization of LPS, differentiation of dendritic cells, induction of chemokines, and so on. Currently, loading AMPs onto ENMs without damaging their secondary structure and bioactivities remains a difficult task. Blending electrospinning, coaxial electrospinning, and LBL self-assembly technology can be used to solve this problem. Notably, strong polar solvents such as HFIP should not be used during the processing to prevent the denaturation and inactivation of the AMPs. There is an inevitable burst of AMPs loaded by physical methods. Song et al. successfully grafted Cys-KR12 AMP onto silk fibroin nanofibers using the EDC/NHS reaction [109]. The EDC–NHS reaction is widely used in crosslinking among natural and synthetic proteins. The reaction conditions are relatively mild to avoid the destruction of the structure and function of AMPs [110]. Immobilization of AMPs on ENMs can not only inhibit burst release but also reduce the dosage of AMPs as well as the nonspecific side effects caused by the diffusion of AMPs.
Compared with traditional antibiotics, the molecular weight of AMP is relatively large. Thus, the ability of AMP to penetrate the barrier structure of the skin is significantly blocked. To solve this problem, Yajuan Su combined the microneedle patch and ENM to create a transdermal drug delivery system [111]. Janus-type dressings are depicted in Fig. 5a, b, which consist of an AMP-loaded nanofiber and a microneedle patch, with the AMP released after the microneedle pierces the skin tissue. The authors also investigated and calculated the sustained-release dynamics of AMP using computer simulation, as shown in Fig. 4c. Compared with percutaneous absorption, the efficiency of transdermal drug delivery was significantly enhanced. Polymeric pseudopeptides (PPPs) are a new class of antibacterial molecules constructed from polymer skeletons and antibacterial peptide functional groups [112]. Compared with AMPs, PPPs have lower immunogenicity and are not easily cleared by the host immune system. Minseong Kim designed a modular PPP based on polyethylene glycol (PEG), which successfully simulated the lysine/serine/leucine residues of AMP, and the obtained products showed good antibacterial properties against various bacteria [113]. Because AMPs and PPPs are not only antibacterial but also potentially toxic to hosts, improving their biocompatibility remains a significant challenge. Jianhao Wang described a pH-converted AMP-loaded wound dressing [114]. The researchers created an octapeptide (IKFQFHFD) that is biocompatible under neutral conditions, but only has antibacterial activity in the acidic environment of infected wounds.
Metal and Metal Oxides
Metal-based antibacterial reagents have a long history, dating back to the use of silverware to store food in ancient China. Over a century ago, researchers first used AgNO3 solution to treat infectious wounds. AgNO3 is a highly toxic reagent that rapidly oxidizes. When exposed to light or organics, it quickly decomposes. Ag nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) have lower toxicity, are easier to store, and have a wide range of applications [115]. Ag-NPs dissociate a small amount of Ag ions on wound sites, effectively sterilizing and avoiding the toxic effect of Ag ion expulsion. The antibacterial effect of Ag NPs is significantly affected by the topological morphology. This phenomenon can be attributed to the specific surface area and stability of Ag NPs [116]. Michał Moritz summarized the synthetic methods of Ag NPs, including chemical, physical, and biological reduction methods [35]. In recent decades, the chemical reduction of Ag NPs using dopamine or plant extracts as raw materials has been widely reported [117,118,119,120]. These renewable and nontoxic reducing agents will strongly promote the development of green chemistry.
Metal oxides derived from early transition metals demonstrated unique physicochemical properties, including selective oxidation, dehydration, photocatalysis, and electrocatalysis. Surface area and quantum effects are two important aspects that contribute to the unique features of metal oxides. Metal oxide nanoparticles have a higher surface area per unit mass than their bulk-sized counterparts. The characteristics of metal oxides change as the surface area grows. Quantum effects are caused by the continuous movement of atoms within metal oxides. An increase in surface area will result in an increase in the number of surface atoms in continual motion, which will eventually alter the optical, electrical, and magnetic properties of metal oxide NPs [121, 122].
Metal oxides can be generated in various forms and sizes ranging from 1 to 100 nm in size. Thus, metal oxide NPs have various properties as well as broad biomedical uses, including the ability to permeate the cell membrane and interior cellular organelles and even traverse the blood‒brain barrier. Magnetic metal oxide nanoparticles (NPs) are of particular interest in biomedical research due to their ability to be manipulated by an external magnetic field [123], and the physicochemical properties of these metal oxide NPs are highly related to their size and shape [124]. Some of them exhibit biocompatibility and chemical stability and can eliminate cancer cells at low doses while remaining nontoxic toward normal cells; thus, an increasing number of advances have been made in retinopathy, biological sensors, and cancer treatment [125,126,127].
Except for Ag-NPs, Au, Cu, ZnO, TiO2, Fe3O4 and other metal and metal oxides (MMOs) also have good antibacterial effects [128,129,130,131], because small NPs can enter bacterial cells and dissolve, releasing harmful metal ions. As shown in Fig. 6, the antibacterial mechanisms of MMOs include the destruction of the bacterial cell wall and plasma membrane, the inactivity of biochemical processes, and DNA damage [78, 132]. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) plays key roles in the process of bacterial death. MMOs also have some additional eye-catching functions. For example, TiO2 NPs can shield from ultraviolet rays and reduce DNA damage [133]. Zn2+ is an essential cofactor of more than 300 enzymes, such as alkaline phosphatase (ALP), dopachrome tautomerase, metallothionein and metalloproteinase [134, 135]. Jiang Chang reported promoting hair follicle regeneration in burns by the synergistic release of Zn2+ and SiO32− [135]. Yuanjin Zhao fabricated a ZIF-8 metal organic framework (MOF)-loaded microneedle patch, which can release Zn2+ to promote wound healing [136]. Exploring the characteristics of MMOs is a feasible way to construct composite bioactive wound dressings.
The blending electrospinning technique is commonly used to prepare MMO-loaded antibacterial ENMs. However, the size distribution of MMO-NPs is uneven, and their dispersion is very poor. It is easy to block the pipeline in the process of electrospinning. Thus, researchers should choose MMOs with smaller particle sizes, increase the viscosity of the spinning solution, fully disperse the particles, and shorten the time of electrospinning. In situ synthesis technology can also be used to prepare MMO-loaded antibacterial ENMs. For example, Alippilakkotte Shebi reduced AgNO3 into Ag NPs on a polylactic acid (PLA) nanofiber membrane using extracts of Momordica charantia [137]. In situ synthesized MMO-NPs are distributed on the outside of the ENM and directly contact the bacteria, so the antibacterial effect is better. Lee believes that MMO-NPs can not only release antibacterial ions but also be directly swallowed by bacteria to cooperate with antibacterials [138]. On the other hand, Marius and others believe that the formation of aggregates and anchoring of MMO-NPs on the surface of bacterial cells is the main reason for the enhancement of their antibacterial properties [139]. Host cells can also devour refractory nanoparticles, leaving long-term pigmentation. Thus, the in vivo application of MMO-NPs should be given special attention.
Toxicity is a significant consideration for the safe and successful use of metal oxides in biomedical applications. In several studies, metal nanoparticles have been confirmed to be hazardous to humans, while the toxicity of metal nanoparticles is determined by their size and surface load. Thus, it is necessary to identify any potential health risks associated with these metal oxide NPs. For biomedical applications, metal oxide NPs and their complex ENMs should ideally have the following characteristics: (1) chemically stable, (2) resistance to wear and scratching, (3) biocompatible, and (4) nontoxic [140]. Today, the usage of metal oxides has attained an internationally recognized standard; these international standards outline the requirements and accompanying test techniques for biocompatible metal oxide materials for medical applications.
Antibacterial Polymers
Antibacterial polymers are of increasing interest. A series of natural polymers, such as chitosan, cellulose, silk fibroin (SF), collagen, and hyaluronic acid (HA), and synthetic polymers, such as polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polycaprolactone (PCL), and polyethylene glycol (PEG), have been widely reported in the field of skin tissue engineering (STE) [141, 142]. Except for chitosan, the antibacterial properties of most natural and synthetic polymers cannot meet the clinical requirements. Thus, those polymers are commonly used as the substrate of ENM to load antibacterial agents such as antibiotics, Ag NPs and AMPs. Polymers with functional chemical groups can be endowed with unprecedented antibacterial activity through chemical modifications. Currently, cationic quaternary ammonium salt (CQAS) is the main antibacterial polymer under research.
In recent years, great progress has been made in the preparation and medical application of CQAS. As shown in Fig. 7a, b, Zhang’s group applied KOH/urea solution to dissolve chitin at low temperature and then reacted it with epoxy propyl trimethyl ammonium chloride (EPTAC) under alkaline conditions to prepare a series of quaternized chitin (QC) with different degrees of substitution [143]. QC exhibited good biocompatibility and antibacterial effects toward four different pathogens. Other CQASs, such as quaternized chitosan, quaternized agarose, and quaternized cellulose, have also been synthesized [144,145,146] and could serve as the ideal molecular frameworks of wound dressing materials via various crosslinking strategies [147]. As shown in Fig. 7c, our group has previously fabricated a series of QC-based composite ENMs via layer-by-layer (LBL) self-assembly [17]. As one of the important upstream raw materials, the emergence of CQAS has strongly promoted the development of a series of polymer-based antibacterial wound dressings. Baolin Guo’s group designed a series of hydrogel wound dressings with quaternized chitosan as the antibacterial component, realizing an organic combination of multiple physical, chemical and biological activities, such as antibacterial activity, tissue adhesion, conductivity, antioxidation, hemostasis, self-healing, and shape memory [148,149,150,151].
The mechanism of CQAS and the composited antibacterial ENM is shown in Fig. 8a. The negatively charged bacteria are drawn to the positively charged groups on the molecular chain of CQAS. The hydrophobic molecular chain inserts into the bacterial cell membrane, while the hydrophilic part remains outside, destroying the cell membrane’s integrity and eventually resulting in bacterial lysis and death [26]. Compared with antibiotics, the use of CAQS will not lead to drug resistance. Our group has also synthetized an antibacterial polymer with completely independent intellectual property rights (IPR) [152]. As shown in Fig. 8b, melamine-modified silk fibroin (SF-Mel) with antibacterial activity was obtained by a chemical crosslinking method. Furthermore, SF-Mel was dissolved in HFIP and blended with polycaprolactone (PCL) to obtain a series of PCL/SF-Mel composite ENMs. These products exhibit broad-spectrum antibacterial activity, promoting epithelial cell proliferation and revascularization, and have been successfully used in the wound healing of full-thickness skin defects in rats.
Compared with traditional polymers, the cytotoxicity of modified antibacterial polymers (MAPs) is relatively high. To reduce the cytotoxicity, the water solubility of MAPs should be inhibited to reduce the local diffusion among the wound sites. Jiahui He used the molecular cage effect of PCL to immobilize quaternized chitosan [153]. The antibacterial CQAS can also form a polyelectrolyte complex with another polymer with opposite charge and then be loaded on the ENMs. This physical immobilization method is expected to achieve the coordination and unity of antibacterial and biocompatibility of ENMs.
Translational Research from Bench to Bedsides
Wound dressings are classified as Class 2 or Class 3 medical equipment. Since June 1, 2021, the revised regulations on the Supervision and Administration of Medical Devices have been officially implemented by the State Council, which put forward more comprehensive requirements for the clinical evaluation of medical devices. Preclinical research and clinical trials according to national standards are necessary for wound dressing transformation [154]. Despite the publication of several studies, only a handful have been effectively translated and clinically applied. One of the main concerns is that research finding derived from cells and animal models is insufficient to fulfill the criteria of medical devices. Currently, research achievements on wound dressings are mainly created by scientists and technical workers from the fields of materials science, chemistry, and biomedical engineering. In the context of translational medicine, clinicians, with their superior etiology, clinical thinking and surgical skills, have joined the research and development of medical devices in an unprecedented role. Of note, most high-quality clinical trials are performed by foreign institutions, while the number of domestic high level clinical trials is significantly lower. The State Council has announced and issued the “Opinions on Deepening the Reform of the Review and Approval System and Encouraging the Innovation of Drugs and Medical Devices”, which aims to promote the supervision and sustainable development of the medical device industry in China. The Chinese Society for Biomaterials (CSBM) is committed to promoting medical device evaluation and clinical translation and is looking forward to achieving good results.
The authors searched and gathered information on wound dressings registered with the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), including 1040 domestic products and 223 imported products. These commercial wound dressings can be divided into hydrocolloid dressings, foam dressings, silver ion dressings, alginate dressings, chitosan dressings, cellulose dressings, silicone dressings, etc. ENM-based wound dressings are rarely found, because ENM-based wound dressings exhibit varied size-dependent physical and chemical properties, and evaluation criteria from regulatory authorities for ENM-based wound dressings are deficient. In addition, the authors also surveyed the current status of clinical application of wound dressings, and some clinicians reported that the curative effect of wound dressings was not fully satisfactory, and there are some flaws, such as tissue adhesion and difficulties changing wound dressings. Thus, the establishment of a systematic evaluation system for medical devices is urgent. As shown in Fig. 9a, Do et al. established a skin defect model in pigs to evaluate the clinical efficiency of wound dressings [155]. Compared with other small animal models, the skin of pigs is closer to the human body. Affected by body size, pigs also have significant advantages in constructing a large-area full thickness skin injury model. In addition, skin defect models based on nonhuman primates have rarely been reported. As shown in Fig. 9b, Seungkuk Ahn et al. constructed a humanized research model that simulates the whole process of wound healing by culturing donor skin tissue in vitro [156]. The humanized model retains the pathophysiological characteristics of wound healing to the greatest extent, and its research is much more significant than that of the traditional models. In the future, more humanized models (organoids, patient-derived xenografts) and large animal models (pig, cynomolgus monkey) will be developed. In terms of biosafety evaluation, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued “select updates for biocompatibility of certain devices in contact with intact skin” in 2020. This draft guidance will further improve the review efficiency and reduce the waste of resources on the premise of ensuring the biosafety of medical devices.
An important issue in the translation of medical devices is the unannounced inspection of products, and its core demand is to increase output and reduce energy consumption. Researchers have made extensive attempts and have successively developed array electrospinning, needle-free electrospinning, and other advanced technologies. As shown in Fig. 9c, Cui et al. designed a microfluidic wind-spinning device that successfully realized the large-scale production (40 × 140 cm2) of PCL/SF-fibrinogen nanofiber films with a shell–core structure [157]. Microfluidic wind-spinning technology greatly improves the output of nanofibers and can be used to load various antibacterial reagents, which will have further potential applications. Portable electrospinning devices are another landmark achievement in engineering. Different from traditional electrospinning technology, portable electrospinning technology can conduct in situ electrospinning by coating conductive materials on the surface of living tissues and using them as negative electrodes [158]. Jun Zhang et al. designed a long needle electrospun device and prepared electrospun nanofibers in situ under the assistance of laparoscopy for the first time, which was used to stop bleeding of the liver (Fig. 9d) [159]. The combination of portable electrospinning technology and endoscopic technology has formed a new breakthrough in minimally invasive surgery.
Conclusions and Future Perspectives
In this paper, we summarize the clinical characteristics and requirements of STE, as well as the preparation and modification methods of ENMs. We updated the research advances of antibacterial ENMs, focusing on their antibacterial components, antibacterial mechanisms, biocompatibility and bioactivity evaluations, and material processing techniques. We also collected information from preclinical and clinical research and revealed the promising translational prospects of wound dressings. In the future, the field of antibacterial ENMs will usher in a stage of rapid development to fully fill the higher clinical needs. Several frontier directions should be emphasized.
Antibacterial ENMs can be upgraded by other advanced antibacterial methods and materials. In recent years, photothermal therapy (PTT), photodynamic therapy (PDT), antibacterial traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), and antibacterial metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have made significant progress [160]. PTT can efficiently kill bacteria and inhibit the formation of biofilms. Extensive photothermal raw materials, such as polydopamine (PDA), black phosphorus (BP), methylene blue (MB), and composite products, have been developed for potential clinical applications [161]. However, local high temperature induced by PTT may cause damage to normal tissues and cells. Yuanjin Zhao’s group reported that ZIF-8, a zinc-doped MOF, exhibited excellent broad-spectrum antibacterial activity by the sustained release of Zn2+ [162]. Another inorganic nanomaterial, named BP nanosheets, exhibits antibacterial properties by a nanoknife effect [163]. These antibacterial methods and materials can be introduced into ENMs by potential material processing techniques. For example, PDA was self-polymerized on the surface of curcumin nanocrystals to endow them with enhanced photothermal activity [164]. BP nanosheets and ZIF-8 can be loaded onto ENMs by blend or coaxial electrospinning and LBL self-assembly techniques [165, 166]. It is strongly recommended that two or more antibacterial methods and materials should be combined to improve the clinical effectiveness and safety.
Antibacterial ENMs can integrate with other specific bioactivities and functions. Based on clinical experiences, it was concluded that multifunctional and stimulus-responsive WDs are more competitive. Several regeneration-related bioactivities, including hemostasis, antioxidant, follicle regeneration, ECM remodeling, stem cell and macrophage regulation, and improvement of the harsh wound microenvironment, are of increasing interest [167, 168]. Notably, a brand-new strategy of photobiomodulation has been recently developed to provide a noninvasive and real-time intervention for wound healing [169]. ENMs offer a high potential for incorporating antibacterial activity and other bioactivities due to their unique structural characteristics. In recent years, flexible electronics with diagnostic functions have been gradually introduced into the field of STE. Dachao Li’s group developed a thermally activated epidermal biomicrofluidic device for accurate monitoring of blood glucose, which is the most important prognostic index of diabetic feet [170]. Novel flexible electronics have also been reported for monitoring somatic movement, pH value and sweat [171, 172]. The currently available flexible electronics typically have poor biodegradability and biocompatibility in vivo. There are great challenges and opportunities to integrate the advantages and disadvantages of antibacterial ENMs and flexible electronics for the collaborative diagnosis and treatment of skin injury.
Uncovering the molecular mechanism of antibacterial ENMs by means of biology is of high interest. For biomaterials science, one of the problems is the lack of an in-depth understanding of the intrinsic links between chemical compositions, physical structures, and biological applications. Researchers have performed many experiments, such as fluorescence quantitative polymeric chain reaction, Western blot, and flow cytometry [173]. However, these experimental methodologies have certain limitations. High-throughput technologies, such as transcriptome sequencing, proteome sequencing, and single-cell sequencing, have been steadily expanded to the field of biomaterials science [174]. Ouyang Hongwei and his collaborators uncovered the mechanism of bone regeneration by transcriptome sequencing combined with Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology (GO) analysis [175]. Compared to traditional methodologies, high-throughput technologies are more competitive in reflecting the real world. In recent years, biology has made great progress in disease development, such as copper death, ubiquitination, and autophagy. Below are some crucial problems to be solved. (1) Will biomaterials work through these specific biological mechanisms? (2) Can biomaterials be designed to regulate specific biological mechanisms? Yihang Pan’s group has just published the first article on the use of copper-based biomaterials to induce copper death and antitumor therapy [176]. More interdisciplinary works in biomaterials science and biology are emerging and accelerating the clinical translation process.
References
Martin P. Wound healing–aiming for perfect skin regeneration. Science. 1997;276(5309):75.
Kalantari K, Mostafavi E, Afifi AM, Izadiyan Z, Jahangirian H, Rafiee-Moghaddam R, Webster TJ. Wound dressings functionalized with silver nanoparticles: promises and pitfalls. Nanoscale. 2020;12(4):2268.
Jahromi MAM, Zangabad PS, Basri SMM, Zangabad KS, Ghamarypour A, Aref AR, Karimi M, Hamblin MR. Nanomedicine and advanced technologies for burns: preventing infection and facilitating wound healing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;123:33.
Liu Y, Zhang YF, Mei TX, Cao H, Hu YH, Jia WW, Wang J, Zhang ZL, Wang Z, Le WJ, et al. hESCs-derived early vascular cell spheroids for cardiac tissue vascular engineering and myocardial infarction treatment. Adv Sci. 2022;9(9):13.
Farahani M, Shafiee A. Wound healing: from passive to smart dressings. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;10(16):32.
Li T, Sun MC, Wu SH. State-of-the-art review of electrospun gelatin-based nanofiber dressings for wound healing applications. Nanomaterials. 2022;12(5):24.
Farokhi M, Mottaghitalab F, Fatahi Y, Khademhosseini A, Kaplan DL. Overview of silk fibroin use in wound dressings. Trends Biotechnol. 2018;36(9):907.
Greenhalgh DG, Longo DL. Management of burns. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(24):2349.
Patel S, Srivastava S, Singh MR, Singh D. Mechanistic insight into diabetic wounds: pathogenesis, molecular targets and treatment strategies to pace wound healing. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;112:15.
Barrett EJ, Liu ZQ, Khamaisi M, King GL, Klein R, Klein BEK, Hughes TM, Craft S, Freedman BI, Bowden DW, et al. Diabetic microvascular disease: an endocrine society scientific statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(12):4343.
Liang Y, Li M, Yang Y, Qiao L, Xu H, Guo B. pH/Glucose dual responsive metformin release hydrogel dressings with adhesion and self-healing via dual-dynamic bonding for athletic diabetic foot wound healing. ACS Nano. 2022;16(2):3194.
Patrulea V, Ostafe V, Borchard G, Jordan O. Chitosan as a starting material for wound healing applications. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015;97(Pt B):417.
Yang Y, Zhao X, Yu J, Chen X, Wang R, Zhang M, Zhang Q, Zhang Y, Wang S, Cheng Y. Bioactive skin-mimicking hydrogel band-aids for diabetic wound healing and infectious skin incision treatment. Bioactive Mater. 2021;6(11):3962.
Wang M, Wang CG, Chen M, Xi YW, Cheng W, Mao C, Xu TZ, Zhang XX, Lin C, Gao WY, et al. Efficient angiogenesis-based diabetic wound healing/skin reconstruction through bioactive antibacterial adhesive ultraviolet shielding nanodressing with exosome release. ACS Nano. 2019;13(9):10279.
Zeng Y, Zhu L, Han Q, Liu W, Mao XJ, Li YQ, Yu NZ, Feng SY, Fu QYE, Wang XJ, et al. Preformed gelatin microcryogels as injectable cell carriers for enhanced skin wound healing. Acta Biomater. 2015;25:291.
Yang XP, Li LF, Yang DZ, Nie J, Ma GP. Electrospun core-shell fibrous 2D scaffold with biocompatible poly(glycerol sebacate) and poly-l-lactic acid for woundhealing. Adv Fiber Mater. 2020;2(2):105.
Hu WK, Wang ZJ, Zha Y, Gu X, You WJ, Xiao Y, Wang XH, Zhang SM, Wang JL. High flexible and broad antibacterial nanodressing induces complete skin repair with angiogenic and follicle regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater. 2020;9(23):13.
Zhao JW, Cui WG. Functional electrospun fibers for local therapy of cancer. Adv Fiber Mater. 2020;2(5):229.
Yuan ZC, Sheng DN, Jiang LP, Shafiq M, Khan AUR, Hashim R, Chen YJ, Li BJ, Xie XR, Chen J, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor-capturing aligned electrospun polycaprolactone/gelatin nanofibers promote patellar ligament regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2022;140:233.
Chen RM, Zhao C, Chen ZP, Shi XY, Zhu HX, Bu Q, Wang L, Wang CF, He H. A bionic cellulose nanofiber-based nanocage wound dressing for NIR-triggered multiple synergistic therapy of tumors and infected wounds. Biomaterials. 2022;281:13.
Yu R, Zhang HL, Guo BL. Conductive biomaterials as bioactive wound dressing for wound healing and skin tissue engineering. Nano-Micro Lett. 2022;14(1):46.
Yerra A, Dadala MM. Silk fibroin electrospun nanofiber blends with antibiotics and polyvinyl alcohol for burn wound healing. J Appl Polym Sci. 2022;139(15):10.
Liu XK, Xu HX, Zhang MX, Yu DG. Electrospun medicated nanofibers for wound healing. Rev Membr. 2021;11(10):22.
Koehler J, Brandl FP, Goepferich AM. Hydrogel wound dressings for bioactive treatment of acute and chronic wounds. Eur Polymer J. 2018;100:1.
Rajendran NK, Kumar SSD, Houreld NN, Abrahamse H. A review on nanoparticle based treatment for wound healing. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2018;44:421.
Wang ZJ, Hu WK, You WJ, Huang G, Tian WQ, Huselstein C, Wu CL, Xiao Y, Chen Y, Wang XH. Antibacterial and angiogenic wound dressings for chronic persistent skin injury. Chem Eng J. 2021;404:13.
Cheng G, Yin CC, Tu H, Jiang S, Wang Q, Zhou X, Xing X, Xie CY, Shi XW, Du YM, et al. Controlled co-delivery of growth factors through layer-by-layer assembly of core-shell nanofibers for improving bone regeneration. ACS Nano. 2019;13(6):6372.
Li YJ, Wei SC, Chu HW, Jian HJ, Anand A, Nain A, Huang YF, Chang HT, Huang CC, Lai JY. Poly-quercetin-based nanoVelcro as a multifunctional wound dressing for effective treatment of chronic wound infections. Chem Eng J. 2022;437:10.
Kramer A, Dissemond J, Kim S, Willy C, Mayer D, Papke R, Tuchmann F, Assadian O. Consensus on wound antisepsis: update 2018. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2018;31(1):28.
Las Heras K, Igartua M, Santos-Vizcaino E, Hernandez RM. Chronic wounds: current status, available strategies and emerging therapeutic solutions. J Controlled Release. 2020;328:532.
Brazil JC, Quiros M, Nusrat A, Parkos CA. Innate immune cell-epithelial crosstalk during wound repair. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(8):2983.
Boni BOO, Lamboni L, Souho T, Gauthier M, Yang G. Immunomodulation and cellular response to biomaterials: the overriding role of neutrophils in healing. Mater Horizons. 2019;6(6):1122.
Rutkow I. Joseph lister and his 1876 tour of America. Ann Surg. 2013;257(6):1181.
Mao JY, Chen L, Cai ZW, Qian ST, Liu ZM, Zhao BF, Zhang YG, Sun XM, Cui WG. Advanced biomaterials for regulating polarization of macrophages in wound healing. Adv Funct Mater. 2022;32(12):25.
Moritz M, Geszke-Moritz M. The newest achievements in synthesis, immobilization and practical applications of antibacterial nanoparticles. Chem Eng J. 2013;228:596.
Mookherjee N, Anderson MA, Haagsman HP, Davidson DJ. Antimicrobial host defence peptides: functions and clinical potential. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2020;19(5):311.
Adaligil E, Patil K, Rodenstein M, Kumar K. Discovery of peptide antibiotics composed ofd-amino acids. ACS Chem Biol. 2019;14(7):1498.
Melo-Cristino J, Larpin Y, Oechslin F, Moreillon P, Resch G, Entenza JM, Mancini S. In vitro characterization of PlyE146, a novel phage lysin that targets gram-negative bacteria. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0192507.
Wolcott RD, Hanson JD, Rees EJ, Koenig LD, Phillips CD, Wolcott RA, Cox SB, White JS. Analysis of the chronic wound microbiota of 2,963 patients by 16S rDNA pyrosequencing. Wound Repair Regen. 2016;24(1):163.
Atkin L, Bućko Z, Conde Montero E, Cutting K, Moffatt C, Probst A, Romanelli M, Schultz GS, Tettelbach W. Implementing TIMERS: the race against hard-to-heal wounds. J Wound Care. 2019;23(Sup3a):1.
Dowd SE, Wolcott RD, Kennedy J, Jones C, Cox SB. Molecular diagnostics and personalised medicine in wound care: assessment of outcomes. J Wound Care. 2011;20(5):232.
Wolcott RD, Rumbaugh KP, James G, Schultz G, Phillips P, Yang Q, Watters C, Stewart PS, Dowd SE. Biofilm maturity studies indicate sharp debridement opens a time- dependent therapeutic window. J Wound Care. 2010;19(8):320.
Eriksson E, Liu PY, Schultz GS, Martins-Green MM, Tanaka R, Weir D, Gould LJ, Armstrong DG, Gibbons GW, Wolcott R, et al. Chronic wounds: treatment consensus. Wound Repair Regen. 2022;30(2):156.
Rathinam VAK, Fitzgerald KA. Inflammasome complexes: emerging mechanisms and effector functions. Cell. 2016;165(4):792.
Wang Z, You W, Wang W, Tian W, Chen F, Xiao Y, Chen Y, Wang X. Dihydromyricetin-incorporated multilayer nanofibers accelerate chronic wound healing by remodeling the harsh wound microenvironment. Adv Fiber Mater. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42765-022-00180-5.
Qu J, Zhao X, Liang Y, Xu Y, Ma PX, Guo B. Degradable conductive injectable hydrogels as novel antibacterial, anti-oxidant wound dressings for wound healing. Chem Eng J. 2019;362:548.
Mascharak S, DesJardins-Park HE, Davitt MF, Griffin M, Borrelli MR, Moore AL, Chen K, Duoto B, Chinta M, Foster DS, et al. Preventing Engrailed-1 activation in fibroblasts yields wound regeneration without scarring. Science. 2021;372(6540):362.
Kim CS, Ding XL, Allmeroth K, Biggs LC, Kolenc OI, L’Hoest N, Chacon-Martinez CA, Edlich-Muth C, Giavalisco P, Quinn KP, et al. Glutamine metabolism controls stem cell fate reversibility and long-term maintenance in the hair follicle. Cell Metab. 2020;32(4):629.
Chen RK, Zhu ZY, Ji SF, Geng ZJ, Hou Q, Sun XY, Fu XB. Sweat gland regeneration: current strategies and future opportunities. Biomaterials. 2020;255:19.
Xue J, Wu T, Dai Y, Xia Y. Electrospinning and electrospun nanofibers: methods, materials, and applications. Chem Rev. 2019;119(8):5298.
Tebyetekerwa M, Xu Z, Yang SY, Ramakrishna S. Electrospun nanofibers-based face masks. Adv Fiber Mater. 2020;2(3):161.
Cheng X, Cheng G, Xing X, Yin CC, Cheng Y, Zhou X, Jiang S, Tao FH, Deng HB, Li ZB. Controlled release of adenosine from core-shell nanofibers to promote bone regeneration through STAT3 signaling pathway. J Control Release. 2020;319:234.
Hu WK, Wang ZJ, Xu Y, Wang XH, Xiao Y, Zhang SM, Wang JL. Remodeling of inherent antimicrobial nanofiber dressings with melamine-modified fibroin into neoskin. J Mat Chem B. 2019;7(21):3412.
Cheng X, Cheng G, Xing X, Yin C, Cheng Y, Zhou X, Jiang S, Tao F, Deng H, Li Z. Controlled release of adenosine from core-shell nanofibers to promote bone regeneration through STAT3 signaling pathway. J Controlled Release. 2020;319:234.
Zhang RJ, Wang ZJ, You WJ, Zhou FF, Guo ZC, Qian KY, Xiao Y, Wang XH. Suppressive effects of plumbagin on the growth of human bladder cancer cells via PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways and EMT. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20(1):17.
Li K, Clarkson CM, Wang L, Liu Y, Lamm M, Pang Z, Zhou Y, Qian J, Tajvidi M, Gardner DJ, et al. Alignment of cellulose nanofibers: harnessing nanoscale properties to macroscale benefits. ACS Nano. 2021;15(3):3646.
Xu H, Fang ZH, Tian WQ, Wang YF, Ye QF, Zhang LN, Cai J. Green fabrication of amphiphilic quaternized beta-chitin derivatives with excellent biocompatibility and antibacterial activities for wound healing. Adv Mater. 2018;30(29):11.
Agarwal Y, Rajinikanth PS, Ranjan S, Tiwari U, Balasubramnaiam J, Pandey P, Arya DK, Anand S, Deepak P. Curcumin loaded polycaprolactone-/polyvinyl alcohol-silk fibroin based electrospun nanofibrous mat for rapid healing of diabetic wound: an in-vitro and in-vivo studies. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;176:376.
Zhang Q, Tong Z, Chen FX, Wang XM, Ren MX, Zhao YN, Wu P, He XH, Chen P, Chen Y. Aligned soy protein isolate-modified poly(L-lactic acid) nanofibrous conduits enhanced peripheral nerve regeneration. J Neural Eng. 2020;17(3):15.
Ma WD, Zhou MJ, Dong WY, Zhao S, Wang YL, Yao JH, Liu ZW, Han HS, Sun DH, Zhang M. A bi-layered scaffold of a poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanofiber mat and an alginate-gelatin hydrogel for wound healing. J Mat Chem B. 2021;9(36):7492.
Zhang H, Zhang MY, Wang XM, Zhang M, Wang XL, Li YY, Cui ZE, Chen XP, Han YT, Zhao WW. Electrospun multifunctional nanofibrous mats loaded with bioactive anemoside B4 for accelerated wound healing in diabetic mice. Drug Deliv. 2022;29(1):174.
Zhang Q, Du QY, Zhao YA, Chen FX, Wang ZJ, Zhang YX, Ni H, Deng HB, Li YP, Chen Y. Graphene oxide-modified electrospun polyvinyl alcohol nanofibrous scaffolds with potential as skin wound dressings. RSC Adv. 2017;7(46):28826.
Khalek MAA, Gaber SAA, El-Domany RA, El-Kemary MA. Photoactive electrospun cellulose acetate/polyethylene oxide/methylene blue and trilayered cellulose acetate/polyethylene oxide/silk fibroin/ ciprofloxacin nanofibers for chronic wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;193(8):1752.
Yang JK, Wang K, Yu DG, Yang YY, Bligh SWA, Williams GR. Electrospun Janus nanofibers loaded with a drug and inorganic nanoparticles as an effective antibacterial wound dressing. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl. 2020;111:10.
Yin J, Xu L, Ahmed A. Batch preparation and characterization of electrospun porous polylactic acid-based nanofiber membranes for antibacterial wound dressing. Adv Fiber Mater. 2022;4(4):13.
Nanditha CK, Kumar GSV. Bioactive peptides laden nano and micro-sized particles enriched ECM inspired dressing for skin regeneration in diabetic wounds. Mater Today Bio. 2022;14:12.
Ramalingam R, Dhand C, Mayandi V, Leung CM, Ezhilarasu H, Karuppannan SK, Prasannan P, Ong ST, Sunderasan N, Kaliappan I, et al. Core-shell structured antimicrobial nanofiber dressings containing herbal extract and antibiotics combination for the prevention of biofilms and promotion of cutaneous wound healing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(21):24356.
Gwon K, Choi WI, Lee S, Lee JS, Shin JH. Biodegradable hyaluronic acid-based, nitric oxide-releasing nanofibers for potential wound healing applications. Biomater Sci. 2021;9(24):8160.
Kandhasamy S, Arthi N, Arun RP, Verma RS. Synthesis and fabrication of novel quinone-based chromenopyrazole antioxidant-laden silk fibroin nanofibers scaffold for tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl. 2019;102:773.
Ke MF, Wang ZJ, Dong Q, Chen FX, He L, Huselstein C, Wang XH, Chen Y. Facile fabrication of soy protein isolate-functionalized nanofibers with enhanced biocompatibility and hemostatic effect on full-thickness skin injury. Nanoscale. 2021;13(37):15743.
Liu RR, Hou LL, Yue GC, Li HK, Zhang JS, Liu J, Miao BB, Wang N, Bai J, Cui ZM, et al. Progress of fabrication and applications of electrospun hierarchically porous nanofibers. Adv Fiber Mater. 2022;4(4):27.
Colomer I, Chamberlain AER, Haughey MB, Donohoe TJ. Hexafluoroisopropanol as a highly versatile solvent. Nat Rev Chem. 2017;1(11):12.
Miguel SP, Figueira DR, Simões D, Ribeiro MP, Coutinho P, Ferreira P, Correia IJ. Electrospun polymeric nanofibres as wound dressings: a review. Colloids Surf B. 2018;169:60.
Sulaiman S, Cieh NL, Mokhtar MN, Naim MN, Kamal S. M. M. Covalent immobilization of cyclodextrin glucanotransferase on kenaf cellulose nanofiber and its application in ultrafiltration membrane system. Process Biochem. 2017;55:85.
Jeckson TA, Neo YP, Sisinthy SP, Gorain B. Delivery of therapeutics from layer-by-layer electrospun nanofiber matrix for wound healing: an update. J Pharm Sci. 2021;110(2):635.
Zhou F, Cui C, Sun S, Wu S, Chen S, Ma J, Li CM. Electrospun ZnO-loaded chitosan/PCL bilayer membranes with spatially designed structure for accelerated wound healing. Carbohydr Polym. 2022;282:119131.
Ke M, Wang Z, Dong Q, Chen F, He L, Huselstein C, Wang X, Chen Y. Facile fabrication of soy protein isolate-functionalized nanofibers with enhanced biocompatibility and hemostatic effect on full-thickness skin injury. Nanoscale. 2021;13(37):15743.
Homaeigohar S, Boccaccini AR. Antibacterial biohybrid nanofibers for wound dressings. Acta Biomater. 2020;107:25.
Boncu TE, Ozdemir N. Electrospinning of ampicillin trihydrate loaded electrospun PLA nanofibers I: effect of polymer concentration and PCL addition on its morphology, drug delivery and mechanical properties. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater. 2022;71(9):669.
Iqbal H, Khan BA, Khan ZU, Razzaq A, Khan NU, Menaa B, Menaa F. Fabrication, physical characterizations and in vitro antibacterial activity of cefadroxil-loaded chitosan/poly(vinyl alcohol) nanofibers against Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;144:921.
Fazli Y, Shariatinia Z. Controlled release of cefazolin sodium antibiotic drug from electrospun chitosan-polyethylene oxide nanofibrous Mats. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl. 2017;71:641.
Safdari M, Shakiba E, Kiaie SH, Fattahi A. Preparation and characterization of ceftazidime loaded electrospun silk fibroin/gelatin mat for wound dressing. Fibers Polym. 2016;17(5):744.
Razzaq A, Khan ZU, Saeed A, Shah KA, Khan NU, Menaa B, Iqbal H, Menaa F. Development of cephradine-loaded gelatin/polyvinyl alcohol electrospun nanofibers for effective diabetic wound healing: in-vitro and in-vivo assessments. Pharmaceutics. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13030349.
Lanno GM, Ramos C, Preem L, Putrins M, Laidmae I, Tenson T, Kogermann K. Antibacterial porous electrospun fibers as skin scaffolds for wound healing applications. Acs Omega. 2020;5(46):30011.
Hashemikia S, Farhangpazhouh F, Parsa M, Hasan M, Hassanzadeh A, Hamidi M. Fabrication of ciprofloxacin-loaded chitosan/polyethylene oxide/silica nanofibers for wound dressing application: in vitro and in vivo evaluations. Int J Pharm. 2021;597:120313.
Yang JK, Wang K, Yu DG, Yang YY, Bligh SWA, Williams GR. Electrospun Janus nanofibers loaded with a drug and inorganic nanoparticles as an effective antibacterial wound dressing. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.110805.
Dias AM, da Silva FG, Monteiro APD, Pinzon-Garcia AD, Sinisterra RD, Cortes ME. Polycaprolactone nanofibers loaded oxytetracycline hydrochloride and zinc oxide for treatment of periodontal disease. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl. 2019;103:109798.
Song W, Seta J, Chen L, Bergum C, Zhou ZB, Kanneganti P, Kast RE, Auner GW, Shen M, Markel DC, et al. Doxycycline-loaded coaxial nanofiber coating of titanium implants enhances osseointegration and inhibits Staphylococcus aureus infection. Biomed Mater. 2017;12(4):045008.
Wali A, Gorain M, Inamdar S, Kundu G, Badiger M. In vivo wound healing performance of halloysite clay and gentamicin-incorporated cellulose ether-PVA electrospun nanofiber mats. Acs Appl Bio Mater. 2019;2(10):4324.
Barrientos IJH, Paladino E, Brozio S, Passarelli MK, Moug S, Black RA, Wilson CG, Lamprou DA. Fabrication and characterisation of drug-loaded electrospun polymeric nanofibers for controlled release in hernia repair. Int J Pharm. 2017;517(1–2):329.
Fu RQ, Li CW, Yu CP, Xie H, Shi SJ, Li ZH, Wang Q, Lu LC. A novel electrospun membrane based on moxifloxacin hydrochloride/poly(vinyl alcohol)/sodium alginate for antibacterial wound dressings in practical application. Drug Deliv. 2016;23(3):828.
Gong M, Wan PB, Ma D, Zhong MJ, Liao MH, Ye JJ, Shi R, Zhang LQ. Flexible breathable nanomesh electronic devices for on-demand therapy. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29:26.
Tawfik EA, Alshamsan A, Abul Kalam M, Raish M, Alkholief M, Stapleton P, Harvey K, Craig DQM, Barker SA. In vitro and in vivo biological assessment of dual drug-loaded coaxial nanofibers for the treatment of corneal abrasion. Int J Pharm. 2021;604:120732.
Ahmadian S, Ghorbani M, Mahmoodzadeh F. Silver sulfadiazine-loaded electrospun ethyl cellulose/polylactic acid/collagen nanofibrous mats with antibacterial properties for wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;162:1555.
Ullah S, Hashmi M, Kharaghani D, Khan MQ, Saito Y, Yamamoto T, Lee J, Kim IS. Antibacterial properties of in situ and surface functionalized impregnation of silver sulfadiazine in polyacrylonitrile nanofiber mats. Int J Nanomed. 2019;14:2693.
Amiri N, Ajami S, Shahroodi A, Jannatabad N, Darban SA, Bazzaz BSF, Pishavar E, Kalalinia F, Movaffagh J. Teicoplanin-loaded chitosan-PEO nanofibers for local antibiotic delivery and wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;162:645.
Alavarse AC, Silva FWD, Colque JT, da Silva VM, Prieto T, Venancio EC, Bonvent JJ. Tetracycline hydrochloride-loaded electrospun nanofibers mats based on PVA and chitosan for wound dressing. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl. 2017;77:271.
Wang JY, Cai N, Chan V, Zeng H, Shi HR, Xue YA, Yu FQ. Antimicrobial hydroxyapatite reinforced-polyelectrolyte complex nanofibers with long-term controlled release activity for potential wound dressing application. Colloids Surf Physicochem Eng Aspects. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126722.
Bakhsheshi-Rad HR, Ismail AF, Aziz M, Akbari M, Hadisi Z, Omidi M, Chen XB. Development of the PVA/CS nanofibers containing silk protein sericin as a wound dressing: In vitro and in vivo assessment. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;149:513.
Kalalinia F, Taherzadeh Z, Jirofti N, Amiri N, Foroghinia N, Beheshti M, Bazzaz BSF, Hashemi M, Shahroodi A, Pishavar E, et al. Evaluation of wound healing efficiency of vancomycin-loaded electrospun chitosan/poly ethylene oxide nanofibers in full thickness wound model of rat. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;177:100.
Dhand C, Venkatesh M, Barathi VA, Harini S, Bairagi S, Leng EGT, Muruganandham N, Low KZW, Fazil M, Loh XJ, et al. Bio-inspired crosslinking and matrix-drug interactions for advanced wound dressings with long-term antimicrobial activity. Biomaterials. 2017;138:153.
Lee CH, Liu KS, Cheng CW, Chan EC, Hung KC, Hsieh MJ, Chang SH, Fu XB, Juang JH, Hsieh IC, et al. Codelivery of sustainable antimicrobial agents and platelet-derived growth factor via biodegradable nanofibers for repair of diabetic infectious wounds. Acs Infect Dis. 2020;6(10):2688.
Davani F, Alishahi M, Sabzi M, Khorram M, Arastehfar A, Zomorodian K. Dual drug delivery of vancomycin and imipenem/cilastatin by coaxial nanofibers for treatment of diabetic foot ulcer infections. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl. 2021;123:111975.
Su YJ, McCarthy A, Wong SL, Hollins RR, Wang GS, Xie JW. Simultaneous delivery of multiple antimicrobial agents by biphasic scaffolds for effective treatment of wound biofilms. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;10(12):e2100135.
Cui Z, Luo Q, Bannon MS, Gray VP, Bloom TG, Clore MF, Hughes MA, Crawford MA, Letteri RA. Molecular engineering of antimicrobial peptide (AMP)–polymer conjugates. Biomater Sci. 2021;9(15):5069.
Su Y, Mainardi VL, Wang H, McCarthy A, Zhang YS, Chen S, John JV, Wong SL, Hollins RR, Wang G, et al. Dissolvable microneedles coupled with nanofiber dressings eradicate biofilms via effectively delivering a database-designed antimicrobial peptide. ACS Nano. 2020;14(9):11775.
Dart A, Bhave M, Kingshott P. Antimicrobial peptide-based electrospun fibers for wound healing applications. Macromol Biosci. 2019;19(9):1800488.
Hart P, Wood TM, Tehrani KHME, van Harten RM, Śleszyńska M, Rentero Rebollo I, Hendrickx APA, Willems RJL, Breukink E, Martin NI. De novo identification of lipid II binding lipopeptides with antibacterial activity against vancomycin-resistant bacteria. Chem Sci. 2017;8(12):7991.
Song DW, Kim SH, Kim HH, Lee KH, Ki CS, Park YH. Multi-biofunction of antimicrobial peptide-immobilized silk fibroin nanofiber membrane: Implications for wound healing. Acta Biomater. 2016;39:146.
Adamiak K, Sionkowska A. Current methods of collagen cross-linking: review. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;161:550.
Su YJ, Mainardi VL, Wang HJ, McCarthy A, Zhang YS, Chen SX, John JV, Wong SL, Hollins RR, Wang GS, et al. Dissolvable microneedles coupled with nanofiber dressings eradicate biofilms via effectively delivering a database-designed antimicrobial peptide. ACS Nano. 2020;14(9):11775.
Umedera K, Morita T, Yoshimori A, Yamada K, Katoh A, Kouji H, Nakamura H. Synthesis of three-dimensional (Di)azatricyclododecene scaffold and its application to peptidomimetics. Chem – Eur J. 2021;27(46):11888.
Kim M, Mun W, Jung WH, Lee J, Cho G, Kwon J, Ahn DJ, Mitchell RJ, Kim B-S. Antimicrobial PEGtides: a modular poly(ethylene glycol)-based peptidomimetic approach to combat bacteria. ACS Nano. 2021;15(5):9143.
Wang J, Chen X-Y, Zhao Y, Yang Y, Wang W, Wu C, Yang B, Zhang Z, Zhang L, Liu Y, et al. pH-switchable antimicrobial nanofiber networks of hydrogel eradicate biofilm and rescue stalled healing in chronic wounds. ACS Nano. 2019;13(10):11686.
Sharma VK, Yngard RA, Lin Y. Silver nanoparticles: green synthesis and their antimicrobial activities. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2009;145(1–2):83.
Sun YG, Xia YN. Shape-controlled synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles. Science. 2002;298(5601):2176.
Cao SJ, Yang YF, Zhang SK, Liu KH, Chen J. D. Multifunctional dopamine modification of green antibacterial hemostatic sponge. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl. 2021;127:10.
Mani M, Pavithra S, Mohanraj K, Kumaresan S, Alotaibi SS, Eraqi MM, Gandhi AD, Babujanarthanam R, Maaza M, Kaviyarasu K. Studies on the spectrometric analysis of metallic silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) using Basella alba leaf for the antibacterial activities. Environ Res. 2021;199:8.
Patra D, El Kurdi R. Curcumin as a novel reducing and stabilizing agent for the green synthesis of metallic nanoparticles. Green Chem Lett Rev. 2021;14(3):474.
Behravan M, Panahi AH, Naghizadeh A, Ziaee M, Mandavi R, Mirzapour A. Facile green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Berberis vulgaris leaf and root aqueous extract and its antibacterial activity. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;124:148.
Grassian VH. When size really matters: size-dependent properties and surface chemistry of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles in gas and liquid phase environments. J Phys Chem C. 2008;112(47):18303.
Falcaro P, Ricco R, Yazdi A, Imaz I, Furukawa S, Maspoch D, Ameloot R, Evans JD, Doonan CJ. Application of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles@MOFs. Coord Chem Rev. 2016;307:237.
Khezerlou A, Alizadeh-Sani M, Azizi-Lalabadi M, Ehsani A. Nanoparticles and their antimicrobial properties against pathogens including bacteria, fungi, parasites and viruses. Microb Pathog. 2018;123:505.
Laurent S, Boutry S, Muller RN. Chapter 1 - metal oxide particles and their prospects for applications. In: Mahmoudi M, Laurent S, editors. Iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Elsevier. 2018; 3–42.
Długosz O, Szostak K, Staroń A, Pulit-Prociak J, Banach M. Methods for reducing the toxicity of metal and metal oxide NPs as biomedicine. Materials. 2020;13(2):279.
Vinardell MP, Mitjans M. Antitumor Activities of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials. 2015;5(2):1004.
Anjum S, Hashim M, Malik SA, Khan M, Lorenzo JM, Abbasi BH, Hano C. Recent advances in zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) for cancer diagnosis, target drug delivery, and treatment. Cancers. 2021;13(18):4570.
Wu YF, Zang Y, Xu L, Wang JJ, Jia HG, Miao FJ. Synthesis of high-performance conjugated microporous polymer/TiO2 photocatalytic antibacterial nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng C-Materials Biol Appl. 2021;126:11.
Li Q, Yin YC, Cao DX, Wang Y, Luan PC, Sun X, Liang WT, Zhu HL. Photocatalytic rejuvenation enabled self-sanitizing, reusable, and biodegradable masks against COVID-19. ACS Nano. 2021;15(7):11992.
Leng J, He Y, Yuan Z, Tao BL, Li K, Lin CC, Xu K, Chen MW, Dai LL, Li XM, et al. Enzymatically-degradable hydrogel coatings on titanium for bacterial infection inhibition and enhanced soft tissue compatibility via a self-adaptive strategy. Bioactive Mater. 2021;6(12):4670.
Guo N, Cang F, Wang Z, Zhao TT, Song XR, Farris S, Li YY, Fu YJ. Magnetism and NIR dual-response polypyrrole-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles for bacteria removal and inactivation. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl. 2021;126:11.
Simoes D, Miguel SP, Ribeiro MP, Coutinho P, Mendonca AG, Correia IJ. Recent advances on antimicrobial wound dressing: a review. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2018;127:130.
Ling ZX, Deng J, Zhang ZR, Sui HY, Shi WX, Yuan B, Lin H, Yang X, Cao J, Zhu XD, et al. Spatiotemporal manipulation of L-arginine release from bioactive hydrogels initiates rapid skin wound healing accompanied with repressed scar formation. Appl Mater Today. 2021;24:16.
Wang CG, Wang M, Xu TZ, Zhang XX, Lin C, Gao WY, Xu HZ, Lei B, Mao C. Engineering bioactive self-healing antibacterial exosomes hydrogel for promoting chronic diabetic wound healing and complete skin regeneration (vol 9, pg 65, 2019). Theranostics. 2021;11(20):10174.
Zhang ZWB, Li WB, Liu Y, Yang ZG, Ma LL, Zhuang H, Wang ED, Wu CT, Huan ZG, Guo F, et al. Design of a biofluid-absorbing bioactive sandwich-structured Zn-Si bioceramic composite wound dressing for hair follicle regeneration and skin burn wound healing. Bioactive Mater. 2021;6(7):1910.
Yao S, Chi JJ, Wang YT, Zhao YJ, Luo Y, Wang YA. Zn-MOF encapsulated antibacterial and degradable microneedles array for promoting wound healing. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;10(12):e2100056.
Alippilakkotte S, Kumar S, Sreejith L. Fabrication of PLA/Ag nanofibers by green synthesis method using Momordica charantia fruit extract for wound dressing applications. Colloids Surf Physicochem Eng Aspects. 2017;529:771.
Lee SM, Song KC, Lee BS. Antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles prepared by a chemical reduction method. Korean J Chem Eng. 2010;27(2):688.
Stefan M, Hritcu L, Mihasan M, Pricop D, Gostin I, Olariu RI, Dunca S, Melnig V. Enhanced antibacterial effect of silver nanoparticles obtained by electrochemical synthesis in poly(amide-hydroxyurethane) media. J Mater Sci-Mater Med. 2011;22(4):789.
Dizaj SM, Lotfipour F, Barzegar-Jalali M, Zarrintan MH, Adibkia K. Antimicrobial activity of the metals and metal oxide nanoparticles. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014;44:278.
Campa-Siqueiros PI, Madera-Santana TJ, Castillo-Ortega MM, Lopez-Cervantes J, Ayala-Zavala JF, Ortiz-Vazquez EL. Electrospun and co-electrospun biopolymer nanofibers for skin wounds on diabetic patients: an overview. RSC Adv. 2021;11(25):15340.
Castro KC, Campos MGN, Mei LH. I. Hyaluronic acid electrospinning: challenges, applications in wound dressings and new perspectives. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;173:251.
Xu H, Fang Z, Tian W, Wang Y, Ye Q, Zhang L, Cai J. Green fabrication of amphiphilic quaternized β-chitin derivatives with excellent biocompatibility and antibacterial activities for wound healing. Adv Mater. 2018;30(29):1801100.
Rahimi M, Ahmadi R, Kafil HS, Shafiei-Irannejad V. A novel bioactive quaternized chitosan and its silver-containing nanocomposites as a potent antimicrobial wound dressing: structural and biological properties. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl. 2019;101:360.
Ding FY, Zhong YY, Wu SP, Liu XH, Zou XB, Li HB. Synthesis and characterization of quaternized agar in KOH/urea aqueous solution. New J Chem. 2020;44(39):17062.
Liang XT, Liang B, Wei JY, Zhong SM, Zhang RR, Yin YZ, Zhang YJ, Hu HY, Huang ZQ. A cellulose-based adsorbent with pendant groups of quaternary ammonium and amino for enhanced capture of aqueous Cr(VI). Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;148:802.
Yu R, Li M, Li Z, Pan G, Liang Y, Guo B. Supramolecular thermo-contracting adhesive hydrogel with self-removability simultaneously enhancing noninvasive wound closure and MRSA-infected wound healing. Adv Healthc Mater. 2022;11(13):2102749.
Zhao X, Wu H, Guo BL, Dong RN, Qiu YS, Ma P. X. Antibacterial anti-oxidant electroactive injectable hydrogel as self-healing wound dressing with hemostasis and adhesiveness for cutaneous wound healing. Biomaterials. 2017;122:34.
Qu J, Zhao X, Liang YP, Zhang TL, Ma PX, Guo BL. Antibacterial adhesive injectable hydrogels with rapid self-healing, extensibility and compressibility as wound dressing for joints skin wound healing. Biomaterials. 2018;183:185.
Zhao X, Guo BL, Wu H, Liang YP, Ma PX. Injectable antibacterial conductive nanocomposite cryogels with rapid shape recovery for noncompressible hemorrhage and wound healing. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):17.
Zhao X, Li P, Guo BL, Ma PX. Antibacterial and conductive injectable hydrogels based on quaternized chitosan-graft-polyaniline/oxidized dextran for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2015;26:236.
Hu W, Wang Z, Xu Y, Wang X, Xiao Y, Zhang S, Wang J. Remodeling of inherent antimicrobial nanofiber dressings with melamine-modified fibroin into neoskin. J Mat Chem B. 2019;7(21):3412.
He JH, Liang YP, Shi MT, Guo BL. Anti-oxidant electroactive and antibacterial nanofibrous wound dressings based on poly(epsilon-caprolactone)/quaternized chitosan-graft-polyaniline for full-thickness skin wound healing. Chem Eng J. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.123464.
Han XJ, Alu A, Liu HM, Shi Y, Wei XW, Cai LL, Wei YQ. Biomaterial-assisted biotherapy: a brief review of biomaterials used in drug delivery, vaccine development, gene therapy, and stem cell therapy. Bioactive Mater. 2022;17:29.
Do TB-T, Nguyen TN-T, Ho MH, Nguyen NT-P, Do TM, Vo DT, Hua HT-N, Phan TB, Tran PA, Nguyen H. The efficacy of silver-based electrospun antimicrobial dressing in accelerating the regeneration of partial thickness burn wounds using a porcine model. Polymers. 2021;13(18):3116.
Ahn S, Chantre CO, Ardona HAM, Gonzalez GM, Campbell PH, Parker KK. Biomimetic and estrogenic fibers promote tissue repair in mice and human skin via estrogen receptor beta. Biomaterials. 2020;255:12.
Cui T, Yu J, Li Q, Wang CF, Chen S, Li W, Wang G. Large-scale fabrication of robust artificial skins from a biodegradable sealant‐loaded nanofiber scaffold to skin tissue via microfluidic blow‐spinning. Adv Mater. 2020;32(32):2000982.
Yue YP, Gong XB, Jiao WL, Li Y, Yin X, Si Y, Yu JY, Ding B. In-situ electrospinning of thymol-loaded polyurethane fibrous membranes for waterproof, breathable, and antibacterial wound dressing application. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2021;592:310.
Zhang J, Zhao Y-T, Hu P-Y, Liu J-J, Liu X-F, Hu M, Cui Z, Wang N, Niu Z, Xiang H-F, et al. Laparoscopic electrospinning for in situ hemostasis in minimally invasive operation. Chem Eng J. 2020;395:125089.
Liang YQ, Liang YP, Zhang HL, Guo BL. Antibacterial biomaterials for skin wound dressing. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2022;17(3):353.
Chen QW, Liu XH, Fan JX, Peng SY, Wang JW, Wang XN, Zhang C, Liu CJ, Zhang XZ. Self-mineralized photothermal bacteria hybridizing with mitochondria-targeted metal-organic frameworks for augmenting photothermal tumor therapy. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30(14):13.
Yao S, Chi J, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Luo Y, Wang Y. Zn-MOF encapsulated antibacterial and degradable microneedles array for promoting wound healing. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;10(12):2100056.
Wu Q, Liang M, Zhang S, Liu X, Wang F. Development of functional black phosphorus nanosheets with remarkable catalytic and antibacterial performance. Nanoscale. 2018;10(22):10428.
Xu Z, Deng B, Wang X, Yu J, Xu Z, Liu P, Liu C, Cai Y, Wang F, Zong R, et al. Nanofiber-mediated sequential photothermal antibacteria and macrophage polarization for healing MRSA-infected diabetic wounds. J Nanobiotechnol. 2021;19(1):404.
Zhou L, Liu N, Feng L, Zhao M, Wu P, Chai Y, Liu J, Zhu P, Guo R. Multifunctional electrospun asymmetric wettable membrane containing black phosphorus/Rg1 for enhancing infected wound healing. Bioeng Trans Med. 2022;7(2):e10274.
Ghaee A, Karimi M, Lotfi-Sarvestani M, Sadatnia B, Hoseinpour V. Preparation of hydrophilic polycaprolactone/modified ZIF-8 nanofibers as a wound dressing using hydrophilic surface modifying macromolecules. Mater Sci Eng C. 2019;103:109767.
Yang YT, Liang YP, Chen JY, Duan XL, Guo BL. Mussel-inspired adhesive antioxidant antibacterial hemostatic composite hydrogel wound dressing via photo-polymerization for infected skin wound healing. Bioact Mater. 2022;8:341.
Dong RN, Guo BL. Smart wound dressings for wound healing. Nano Today. 2021;41:22.
Lee SY, Jeon S, Kwon YW, Kwon M, Kang MS, Seong KY, Park TE, Yang SY, Han DW, Hong SW, et al. Combinatorial wound healing therapy using adhesive nanofibrous membrane equipped with wearable LED patches for photobiomodulation. Sci Adv. 2022;8(15):15.
Pu ZH, Zhang XG, Yu HX, Tu JA, Chen HL, Liu YC, Su X, Wang RD, Zhang L, Li DC. A thermal activated and differential self-calibrated flexible epidermal biomicrofluidic device for wearable accurate blood glucose monitoring. Sci Adv. 2021;7(5):11.
Li H, Chang TR, Gai YS, Liang K, Jiao YL, Li DF, Jiang XR, Wang Y, Huang XC, Wu H, et al. Human joint enabled flexible self-sustainable sweat sensors. Nano Energy. 2022;92:12.
Koh A, Kang D, Xue Y, Lee S, Pielak RM, Kim J, Hwang T, Min S, Banks A, Bastien P, et al. A soft, wearable microfluidic device for the capture, storage, and colorimetric sensing of sweat. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(366):13.
Zhang QL, Hong S, Dong X, Zheng DW, Liang JL, Bai XF, Wang XN, Han ZY, Zhang XZ. Bioinspired nano-vaccine construction by antigen pre-degradation for boosting cancer personalized immunotherapy. Biomaterials. 2022;287:14.
Zhang X, Jiang W, Xie C, Wu X, Ren Q, Wang F, Shen X, Hong Y, Wu H, Liao Y, et al. Msx1 + stem cells recruited by bioactive tissue engineering graft for bone regeneration. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):5211.
Bunpetch V, Zhang XA, Li T, Lin JX, Maswikiti EP, Wu Y, Cai DD, Li J, Zhang SF, Wu CT, et al. Silicate-based bioceramic scaffolds for dual-lineage regeneration of osteochondral defect. Biomaterials. 2019;192:323.
Xu Y, Liu S-Y, Zeng L, Ma H, Zhang Y, Yang H, Liu Y, Fang S, Zhao J, Xu Y, et al. Enzyme-engineered nonporous copper(I) coordination polymer nanoplatform for cuproptosis-based synergistic cancer therapy. Adv Mater (Deerfield Beach, Fla). 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202204733.
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by Fellowship of China National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents (BX20220240), Improvement Project for Theranostic Ability on Difficulty Miscellaneous Disease (Tumor) from National Health Commission of China (ZLYNXM202006), Chinese Central Special Fund for Local Science and Technology Development of Hubei Province (2018ZYYD023), and Science and Technology Department of Hubei Province Key Project (2018ACA159).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing financial interests in this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Z., Hu, W., Wang, W. et al. Antibacterial Electrospun Nanofibrous Materials for Wound Healing. Adv. Fiber Mater. 5, 107–129 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42765-022-00223-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42765-022-00223-x