Abstract
The Crop protection system is dominated by the use of synthetic insecticides however incorporation of fungal biocontrol agents (FBA) at lower doses is considered to consolidate the integrated pest management (IPM) program. The success of IPM is delimited and relies on the understanding of how its performance is affected by adverse effects on FBA by agrochemicals deployed for its management as well as of other pests and diseases. In this study, laboratory grade actives of three different insecticides used for the control of Tetranychus urticae were tested at different concentrations to determine their effects on germination, mycelial growth and sporulation of eight entomopathogenic fungal isolates under in vitro conditions. The fungal isolate with the most adverse effects on the biological index was further studied for underlying reasons of antagonism. This paper reports for the first time changes in conidial surface morphology, its germination and penetration capacity on mite cuticle, post insecticide treatment. Bioassays showed that all insecticide actives at their lowest concentration (12.5% MC) were most toxic to Beauveria bassiana P isolate. Ethion and chlorpyriphos were compatible with Hirsutella thompsonii PDBC-1 at 12.5% MC while propargite showed compatibility with B. bassiana MTCC 6097, Metarhizium anisopliae MTCC 4104 and Cordyceps fumosorosea MTCC 4636 at the same concentration. Further, SEM studies showed that post-insecticide treatments, there were structural deformations on the conidial surface with a decrease in its germination and germ tube penetration capacity on the cuticle of T. urticae. Future studies in this area will help in improving IPM along with overcoming insecticide resistance problems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In India, a large proportion of the population (56.7%) is associated with agriculture and is under exposure to insecticides at large (Banerjee et al. 2014; Gupta 2004). Harmful effects of insecticides are not unprecedented and include residue problems in food products and water sources, deleterious effects on livestock and microbial control agents (MCA), resistance in pest insects (Johnsen et al. 2001; Aktar et al. 2009; Widenfalk et al. 2008; Saxena et al. 2002). Among pest insects, Tetranychus urticae has been reported as ‘most resistant’ with > 500 cases of insecticide resistance and against 94 active substances (Michigan State University 2017; IRAC 2017). T. urticae is a polyphagous mite which infects > 900 different plant types (Mondal and Ara 2006) and the injudicious use of synthetic insecticides for its control has led to the development of uncontrolled resistance (Yucel 2021). Nevertheless, pest management operations rely largely on the extensive use of insecticides as other practices might not lead to instant results as desired by farmers (Sharma et al. 2019; Koli and Bhardwaj 2018; Tawfiq and Isra 2013; Kumral et al. 2010).
Entomopathogenic fungi have shown immense potential over the years in controlling many economically crucial insect pests of the agro-ecosystem (Dolinski and Lacey 2007; Lacey and Shapiro-Ilan 2008; Lacey et al. 2015; Qasim et al. 2018, 2021b). Previous studies have recommended higher inoculation rates of fungal biocontrol agents (FBA) for the control to be efficacious (> 90%) (Younas et al. 2017; Rivero-Borja et al. 2018; Meyling et al. 2018). However, the use of FBA at lower inoculation rates in combination with low doses of synthetic insecticides (SI) has replaced the sole use of either two to protect the environment as well as conservation of beneficial insects in the agro-ecosystem (Khun et al. 2021). This combinatorial process makes the insect pest more vulnerable for fungal attachment and penetration via various mechanisms viz. incapacitation of target pest mobility by paralysis, weakening of insect cuticle or removal of fungal conidia from pest body surface via grooming behaviour or gustatory and olfactory signals (Yanagawa et al. 2018; Brito et al. 2008). Workers have reported many insecticides as compatible with EPF (Younas et al. 2017; Rivero-Borja et al. 2018; Meyling et al. 2018) while others have been shown to be antagonistic (Alves et al. 2016; Asi et al. 2010; Akbar et al. 2012). To our knowledge, the underlying cause of this antagonism has not been studied or identified so far. However, few studies have demonstrated the role of some components from emulsifiable concentrates (toluene and similar aromatic solvents) as responsible agents for such adverse effects on bacterial (Morris 1977) and fungal entomopathogens (FE) (Anderson and Roberts 1983) while limited preliminary studies on active ingredients (AI) of pesticides as causative agents for antagonism is documented in the literature (Khun et al. 2021; Chakravarty and Sidhu 1987). In this study, we evaluated the impact of the active ingredient of three insecticides (used against T. urticae) on the germination, mycelial growth and sporulation of entomopathogenic fungi and sought to identify the underlying cause of antagonistic effects on fungal growth parameters by identifying changes in conidial structure. Also the effect of insecticide actives on conidial germination and germ tube penetration of the mite cuticle were observed.
Materials and methods
Strains and preparation of entomopathogenic fungal strains
The fungal isolates viz. Beauveria bassiana (MTCC 6097, MTCC 6291), Metarhizium anisopliae MTCC 4104, Cordyceps fumosorosea (Paecilomyces fumosoroseus) MTCC 4636, Akanthomyces lecanii (Lecanicillium lecanii) MTCC 956 and Cladosporium cladosporioides MTCC 3872 were obtained from Microbial Type Culture Collection (MTCC), Chandigarh, India. Beauveria bassiana P isolate was isolated from the cadavers of T. urticae while Hirsutella thompsonii PDBC-1 was isolated in the laboratory previously.
B. bassiana isolates were cultured on malt extract agar (MEA) while all other isolates were cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar (Sigma Ltd.) supplemented with yeast extract (1% w/v) [SDAY]. These culture media are routinely used for culturing the entomopathogenic fungi and the isolates used in the present study grew best on them, ensuring appropriate response to the insecticide supplemented media in the in vitro study while taking all precautionary measures to avoid any negative effects due to suboptimal media. All these isolates were incubated at 25 ± 1 ºC in the dark. From 14 days old sporulating cultures, conidia were harvested for experimentation. The viability of conidia was evaluated at > 90% RH, and exceeded 90% for all isolates (Zhang et al. 2014, 2016).
Response of eight fungal isolates to insecticide-supplemented media (ISM)
Among the insecticides used for the control of T. urticae, the tested insecticides in the present study are listed in Table 1. These insecticides were chosen at random among the large number of insecticides used in the pest management operation against the mite. In this study, the protocols were adopted from pre-established methods for determining the effects of insecticides on EPF (Coremans Pelseneer 1994). Commercial formulations of insecticides were not used in order to determine that the effect produced is due to the active ingredient in the insecticide. Analytical standards (Laboratory-grade) of propargite, ethion and chlorpyriphos were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and all these had purity levels in the range of 96.3% to 99.9%. These active ingredients (AI) at 12.5%, 25%, 50% and 100% of their respective mean concentrations (MCs) along with negative control (no insecticide) and vehicle control (0.5% acetone) were analyzed for their response against the eight EPF isolates. Five replications were maintained for the experiment at 24 h interval and from each of the five plates of replication for each isolate, conidial suspensions were prepared independently.
The methods used in the study of Oliveira and Neves (2004) were slightly modified and used in the present study. Acetone (3% v/v) has been reported to have a negative impact on EPF (Anderson and Roberts 1983). So in the present study, acetone at lower concentrations was tested for its impact on EPF in preliminary studies prior to evaluation of laboratory-grade analytical standards. Each of the AI was dissolved in acetone (HPLC grade, ≥ 99.8%, Sigma-Aldrich) to prepare 200X MC stock solution (SS). It was further diluted in sterile distilled water to achieve 50X of its MC. This diluted SS was filter-sterilized and added to the warm media at 1/400, 1/200, 1/100 and 1/50 times of the total media volume in order to obtain AI concentrations of 12.5%, 25%, 50% and 100% of its MC in the ISM. The acetone concentration was only 0.25%, 0.125%, 0.0625% in the ISM with 50%, 25% and 12.5% of its MC respectively, so acetone (25%) was added in each of these to obtain a uniform concentration of acetone (0.5%) in each treatment.
From 14 days old sporulating cultures, conidia were harvested from the plates using a sterile spatula and were dispersed in sterile distilled water containing 0.05% tween 20 (Sigma-Aldrich). It was vortexed for 5 min to obtain a homogenized suspension. The conidial concentration was determined using a haemocytometer (Bright-Line™ Hemacytometer, Sigma-Aldrich) and compound microscope (Olympus BX53, 400X) equipped with a digital camera (DP74, Olympus). The concentration of the conidial suspension was adjusted to 1 × 104 conidia mL−1 using Tween 20 (0.05% v/v).
To determine mycelial growth, conidial suspension (10 µL, 1 × 104 conidia mL−1) was inoculated in the centre of ISM. The petri-plates were doubled sealed with parafilm M (Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated (25 ± 2 °C; 15 days). Vegetative growth in terms of two orthogonal diameters was recorded for 7 days (Neves et al. 2001).
For sporulation, the mycelial mat was harvested from the entire surface of the colony with a sterile spatula. The conidia were dispersed in sterile distilled water with Tween 20 (0.05% v/v) and vortexed (5 min) for homogenisation. Using a haemocytometer, conidial concentration was determined as described previously.
To determine conidial germination, a uniform spread of conidial suspension (20 µL, 1 × 104 conidia mL−1) on a SDAY or MEA block (4 cm2) on a sterile glass slide was made. The slides of each treatment and replication were placed in separate moistened filter paper-lined sterile petri plates and incubated (25 ± 2 °C) for 18 h under dark conditions. With 100–200 conidial counts on each slide, conidial germination (%) was determined. If the germ tubes were 2X the diameter of the propagule, the conidia were regarded as germinated.
Rearing of red spider mite, Tetranychus urticae
Brinjal (Solanum melongena) nursery was established and French beans (Phaseolous vulgaris Linn.) seeds were sown in earthen pots and maintained at 25 ± 2 °C, 60 ± 10% RH, and 16 h light photoperiod in screen house at the Department of Entomology, PAU. The leaves (5–6 leaf stage onwards) of these crops were used for rearing Tetranychus urticae adults, collected from various P. vulgaris fields. The mite culture obtained after the second generation was used for experimentation.
Treatment of Tetranychus urticae with Beauveria bassiana P isolate
Under laboratory conditions, petri dishes containing mulberry leaves were sprayed with 2.5 mL of conidial suspension (1 × 106 conidia mL−1) of B. bassiana P isolate (obtained from ISM plates) in a laminar airflow cabinet. Control leaves were treated with Tween 20 (0.3% v/v). The adult mites were released on mulberry leaves damped underneath with moist cotton wool and the petiole of the leaf remained immersed in damped cotton to remain hydrated. The leaf disc was surrounded by a Tanglefoot® barrier to prevent mites from escaping to the lower side of the leaf. The petri dishes were incubated at 25 ± 2 °C, 70 ± 5% RH and observed daily for seven days for mite mortality. All the treatments were replicated thrice, with 20 mites in each replication. In preliminary experiments (data not shown), the infectivity of B. bassiana P isolate (obtained from untreated media plates) at the same conidial concentration against T. urticae was determined and showed high mortality (Dash et al. 2018).
Effect of insecticides
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
SEM studies were used to observe the morphological changes in the conidia and also to determine the tendency of the conidia to germinate and penetrate the cuticle of T. urticae, post insecticide treatment.
Conidial surface morphology of Beauveria bassiana P isolate
Dried conidial samples from control (untreated) and all the treatments were covered with evaporated platinum. Possible morphological changes on the conidial surface were observed under SEM (SEM; Hitachi S4800, Ibaraki, Hitachi) (Shan et al. 2010).
Germination and penetration capacity of Beauveria bassiana P isolate conidia
Adult mites were treated with B. bassiana P isolate suspension (2 mL; 1 × 106 conidia mL−1) for 5 s and each replication was reared separately by the method described above. After 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 h, the treated mites were removed and fixed with glutaraldehyde (10%) and dehydrated using gradient series of ethanol and hexamethyldisilazane. Under a high vacuum evaporator, dried samples were sputter-coated with gold and observed under SEM (Zhang et al. 2018).
Statistical Analysis
The compatibility study between EPF and laboratory-grade analytical standards of insecticides was determined using the biological index (BI), as proposed by Rossi-Zalaf et al. (2008) and used by Ribeiro et al. (2012), da Silva et al. (2013), Alves et al. (2016) and Khun et al. (2021) in their studies, calculated as:
where VG, SP and GER represent radial growth of fungal colony (%), colony sporulation (%) and conidia germination (%), respectively. Compatibility level is indicated by the value of BI, where the value of 0–41, 42–66 and > 66 indicates toxic, moderately toxic and compatible, respectively. All subsequent analyses were performed in Minitab version 19.2020.2.0.
Analysis of the biological indices for the entomopathogenic fungal isolates
For the determination of normality and homogeneity of variance, the Anderson–Darling test (Anderson 2011) and Levene’s test (Erjavec 2011) using Minitab version 19.2020.2.0 were applied, respectively. As the data observed conformation to the assumption of normality, two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using a general linear model from Minitab version 19.2020.2.0 was used. Significant differences between treatments were determined with Tukey adjustment for multiple comparisons using the Lsmeans (Least-Squares means) (Lenth 2016) using Minitab 19.2020.2.0.
Results
Response of entomopathogenic fungal isolates to ISM
The biological index of the tested insecticides was found to vary in all the fungal treatments (P < 0.05, Table 2). These differences were primarily due to the species/strain of EPF, chemical nature of the insecticide and concentration of the insecticide tested. Propargite at 12.5% of its MC was compatible with B. bassiana MTCC 6097, M. anisopliae MTCC 4104 and C. fumosorosea MTCC 4636. Ethion was compatible with H. thompsonii PDBC-1 at 12.5% and 25% of its MCs. Similar to ethion, chlorpyriphos recorded compatibility with H. thompsonii PDBC-1 at 12.5% and 25% of its MCs. An increase in the concentration of insecticides in the media from 12.5% to 100% of their respective MCs showed a resultant decrease in their biological index and it was true for all the tested insecticides (P < 0.05). Propargite, ethion and chlorpyriphos even at their lowest concentration were very toxic to B. bassiana P isolate, A. lecanii MTCC 956 and C. cladosporioides MTCC 3872; B. bassiana P isolate and A. lecanii MTCC 956; B. bassiana MTCC 6097, B. bassiana P isolate and C. cladosporioides MTCC 3872, respectively (Table 2). This signifies differential antagonistic behaviour of fungal strains in response to the same chemical stress. The maximum was recorded by B. bassiana P isolate among all the insecticides at their minimal concentration tested (12.5% MC).
Effect of insecticides on the structure and infectivity of fungal conidia
The surface morphology of EPF conidia and its penetration into the mite cuticle after exposure to insecticides was measured as a function of the mortality of the exposed mites. Intriguingly, SEM observations showed that insecticide-treated conidia of B. bassiana P isolate were deformed or having structural aberrations (Fig. 1B–D) in comparison to the control conidia (Fig. 1A). In all the treatments, most of the conidia shrivel and shed from the surface of conidia within 48 h. This might be due to the reason that following insecticide treatment, and their cell walls become more fragile and vulnerable. Further in control, the conidia germinated on the cuticle of T. urticae and germ tube penetration of the cuticle was also observed (Fig. 1E). However, compared to control, propargite pre-treated conidia showed germination on the conidial surface but didn’t penetrate the cuticle after 24–36 h (Fig. 1F). Ethion pre-treatment led to larger conidia formation in comparison to control and non-penetration of the cuticle was also observed by these larger conidia (Fig. 1G), while hollow tubular structures were observed in chlorpyriphos pre-treated conidia. Also, miniature germ tubes erupted in the latter, which did not show cuticle penetration after 48 h (Fig. 1H).
Discussion
The present study emphasises the importance of interaction between agrochemicals and fungal biocontrol agents (FBA) as well as its impact on the latter, for their use in the soil ecosystem. The fungi are ubiquitous, and most of them are largely studied as biocontrol agents and are imperative components of integrated pest management (IPM) programs (Yadav et al. 2019). The agro-chemicals in the agro-ecosystem, either used in integration with FBA or elsewhere, greatly influence fungi and their functions (Meena et al. 2020; Aktar et al. 2009). This signifies to determine the most suitable FBA to be used in combination with synthetic agro-chemical(s) against insect pest(s) in Integrated Pest Management (IPM). Also, the underlying reasons for fungal antagonism when used with these chemical pest control agents becomes imperative to understand the better protection and sustainability of the environment as a whole.
The agrochemicals, which tend to either have a positive or least effect on the growth parameters of entomopathogenic fungi, should be adopted for their use in IPM (Oliveira et al. 2003; Qasim et al. 2021a). The use of azadirachtin inhibited the growth of Glomus etunicatum strain while carbendazim, hampered colonization as well as community structure of indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Ipsilantis et al. 2012). The application of organophosphate insecticides has been reported to impact various soil fungal populations and nitrogen mineralization rates (Pandey and Singh 2004). These findings suggest that these chemicals depreciated fungal growth efficacy and functions and resulted in structural aberrations in the EPF. There might be a possibility that if their use remained uncontrolled and injudicious, the deformations in the fungal structure might become inherent with generations and affect its pest infectivity rate over time.
To the best of our knowledge, no literature is found on the direct effect of insecticide active ingredients on the structure and infectivity of insecticide-treated conidia against T. urticae. However, preliminary compatibility studies of different insecticides against several pests have been reported (Wari et al. 2020; Abidin et al. 2017; da Silva et al. 2013; Mikunthan and Manjunatha 2010; Oliveira et al. 2003). Our results found agreement with Khun et al. (2021), who reported high toxicity of diazinon active ingredient to germination and growth of M. anisopliae QS155 and B. bassiana B50 at all tested concentrations, except 25% of full-field concentration for later. Yadav et al. (2019) also found that tolfenpyrad, spirotetramat, fipronil were highly toxic to B. bassiana (Bals.) and significantly reduced its vegetative growth and conidia production while emamectin benzoate (@ 0.5, 1 and 1.5FR [field recommendation] dose), imidacloprid (@ 0.5FR and 1FR dose), clothianidin (@ 0.5FR and 1FR dose) and buprofezin (@ 0.5FR and 1FR dose) showed high compatibility. Pelizza et al. (2018) reported that B. bassiana LPSC 1067 grown in the presence of gamma-cyhalothrin (52 ppm), showed 83.13% reduction in conidia production. In contrast, a study by Rashid et al. (2010) reported that tested insecticides inhibited conidial germination of M. anisopliae DEMI 001 independent of their concentrations. At the concentration of 50 ppm, 100%, 28.2% and 3.31% conidial germination reduction were found with hexaflumuron, fipronil and pyriproxyfen. Contrary, the work of Niassy et al. (2012) showed that there was no deleterious effect of imidacloprid on vegetative growth and conidia production of M. anisopliae ICIPE 69. Imidacloprid used with M. brunneum showed similar results during the studies of Paula et al. (2011). This synergistic growth effect is due to the potential of certain fungi to metabolize specific compounds and use them as secondary nutrients (Moino and Alves 1998).
Limited studies have reported adverse effects of chemicals besides pesticides on the structure of EPF. Shan et al. (2010) observed that rodlet layers on the conidial surface of B. bassiana Bb2860 and M. anisopliae Ma456 were removed after treatment with formic acid (FA) and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). They reported that hydrophobins, the proteins associated with adhesion, antigenicity and morphogenesis of the conidial surface, got dissociated after exposure to FA and TFA. These chemicals tend to neutralize hydrophobicity and thus binding of conidia to insect cuticle (Boucias et al. 1988). Exposure to detergents and other chemicals which alters pH sensitize the process of conidial attachment to insect cuticle and inhibits adhesion by 80–90% and 30%, respectively (Holder and Keyhani 2005). The biochemical basis of insecticides killing fungi has been documented by certain workers. NADH oxido-reductase complex-I has been reported to be inhibited by the action of Tolfenpyrad (List FC 2018). Toxicity of Spirotetramat to M. brunneum (Petch) and B. bassiana (Bals.) (Yadav et al. 2019) is attributed to its potential to inhibit acetyl CoA carboxylase, which affects lipid synthesis in fungi (IRAC 2018).
Conclusions
Obtained results showed that propargite, ethion and chlorpyriphos all significantly altered the infectivity potential of Beauveria bassiana P isolate towards Tetranychus urticae. So, there is an urgent need to monitor the potential antagonistic effects of agrochemicals on microbial control agents (MCA), especially in the industries where crop protection programs are reformed by the integration of entomopathogens with synthetic agrochemicals. The development of crop protection calendars will further consolidate these programs, which will not only provide data on interactions between different agrochemicals and MCA but timely profile of chemicals usage in the fields also. More detailed studies need to be conducted concerning the mortality response of T. urticae to the combination treatment of EPF and insecticides that have the potential for efficient mite control together with the reduction in adverse effects on EPF and amounts of insecticide usage as well as prevention or delay in the development of insecticide resistance. Future studies can be explored to advance formulation engineering of insecticide active ingredients to obtain more compatibility with EPF.
References
Abidin AF, Ekowati N, Ratnaningtyas N (2017) Insecticide compatibility to the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae. Scr Biol 4:273–279
Akbar S, Freed S, Hameed A, Gul HT, Akmal M, Malik MN, Naeem M, Khan MB (2012) Compatibility of Metarhizium anisopliae with different insecticides and fungicides. Afr J Microbiol Res 6(17):3956–3962. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR12.417
Aktar MW, Sengupta D, Chowdhury A (2009) Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: their benefits and hazards. Interdiscip Toxicol 2(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10102-009-0001-7
Alves LF, Mamprim AP, Formentini MA, Martins CC, Pinto FG (2016) Effect of disinfectants and pesticides used in poultry houses on Beauveria Bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. fungus. Rev Bras Cienc Avic 18:283–290. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2015-0055
Anderson TE, Roberts DW (1983) Compatibility of Beauveria bassiana isolates with insecticide formulations used in Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) control. J Econ Entomol 76(6):1437–1441. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/76.6.1437
Anderson TW (2011) Anderson-Darling Tests of Goodness-of-Fit. In: Lovric M. (eds) International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 52–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_118
Asi MR, Bashir MH, Afzal M, Ashfaq M, Sahi ST (2010) Compatibility of entomopathogenic fungi, Metarhizium anisopliae and Paecilomyces fumosoroseus with selective insecticides. Pak J Bot 42(6):4207–4214
Banerjee I, Tripathi SK, Roy AS, Sengupta P (2014) Pesticide use pattern among farmers in a rural district of West Bengal, India. J Nat Sci Biol Med 5(2):313–316. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.136173
Boucias DG, Pendland JC, Latge JP (1988) Nonspecific factors involved in attachment of entomopathogenic deuteromycetes to host insect cuticle. Appl Environ Microbiol 54(7):1795–1805. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.54.7.1795-1805.1988
Brito ES, de Paula AR, Vieira LP, Dolinski C, Samuels RI (2008) Combining vegetable oil and sub-lethal concentrations of Imidacloprid with Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae against adult guava weevil Conotrachelus psidii (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Biocontrol Sci Technol 18(7):665–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583150802195965
Chakravarty P, Sidhu SS (1987) Effect of glyphosate, hexazinone and triclopyr on in vitro growth of five species of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Eur J Forest Pathol 17(4–5):204–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.1987.tb01017.x
Coremans Pelseneer J (1994) Laboratory tests on the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria. Laboratoire de Parasitologie (Mycologie), B-1070 Bruxelles, Bulletin OILB SROP (France) 17(10):147–155
da Silva RA, Quintela ED, Mascarin GM, Barrigossi JA, Lião LM (2013) Compatibility of conventional agrochemicals used in rice crops with the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae. Sci Agric 70:152–160. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162013000300003
Dash CK, Bamisile BS, Keppanan R, Qasim M, Lin Y, Islam SU, Hussain M, Wang L (2018) Endophytic entomopathogenic fungi enhance the growth of Phaseolus vulgaris L. (Fabaceae) and negatively affect the development and reproduction of Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). Microb Pathog 125:385–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.09.044
Dolinski C, Lacey LA (2007) Microbial control of arthropod pests of tropical tree fruits. Neotrop Entomol 36:161–179. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1519-566x2007000200001
Erjavec N (2011) Tests for Homogeneity of Variance. In: Lovric M (ed) International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 1595–1596
Gupta PK (2004) Pesticide exposure—Indian scene. Toxicology 198(1–3):83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2004.01.021
Holder DJ, Keyhani NO (2005) Adhesion of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria (Cordyceps) bassiana to substrata. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(9):5260–5266. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.9.5260-5266.2005
Ipsilantis I, Samourelis C, Karpouzas DG (2012) The impact of biological pesticides on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biol Biochem 45:147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.08.007
IRAC (2017) IRAC MoA Classification Scheme. Version 8.3. http://www.irac-online.org/documents/moa-classification/?ext=pdf Accessed 14 June 2019
IRAC (2018) IRAC mode of action classification scheme version 8.4. Insecticide Resistance Action Committee (IRAC) International MoA Working Group. https://www.irac-online.org/modes-of-action/ Accessed 14 June 2019
Johnsen K, Jacobsen CS, Torsvik V, Sørensen J (2001) Pesticide effects on bacterial diversity in agricultural soils–a review. Biol Fertil Soils 33(6):443–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740100351
Khun KK, Ash GJ, Stevens MM, Huwer RK, Wilson BA (2021) Compatibility of Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana with insecticides and fungicides used in macadamia production in Australia. Pest Manag Sci 77(2):709–718. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6065
Koli P, Bhardwaj NR (2018) Status and use of pesticides in forage crops in India. J Pestic Sci 43(4):225–232. https://doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.D18-004
Kumral NA, Çobanoğlu S, Yalcin C (2010) Acaricidal, repellent and oviposition deterrent activities of Datura stramonium L. against adult Tetranychus urticae (Koch). J Pest Sci 83(2):173–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-009-0284-7
Lacey LA, Grzywacz D, Shapiro-Ilan DI, Frutos R, Brownbridge M, Goettel MS (2015) Insect pathogens as biological control agents: back to the future. J Invertebr Pathol 132:1–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2015.07.009
Lacey LA, Shapiro-Ilan DI (2008) Microbial control of insect pests in temperate orchard systems: potential for incorporation into IPM. Annu Rev Entomol 53:121–144. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093419
Lenth RV (2016) Least-squares means: the R package lsmeans. J Stat Softw 69(1):1–33. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v069.i01
List FC (2018) Fungicides sorted by mode of action (including FRAC Code numbering). Fungicide Resistance Action Committee (FRAC). http://www.phi-base.org/images/fracCodeList.pdf Accessed 14 June 2019
Meena RS, Kumar S, Datta R, Lal R, Vijayakumar V, Brtnicky M, Sharma MP, Yadav GS, Jhariya MK, Jangir CK, Pathan SI (2020) Impact of agrochemicals on soil microbiota and management: A review. Land 9(2):34. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9020034
Meyling NV, Arthur S, Pedersen KE, Dhakal S, Cedergreen N, Fredensborg BL (2018) Implications of sequence and timing of exposure for synergy between the pyrethroid insecticide alpha-cypermethrin and the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana. Pest Manag Sci 74(11):2488–2495. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4926
Michigan State University (2017) https://www.pesticideresistance.org/search.php Accessed 5 January, 2019
Mikunthan G, Manjunatha M (2010) Compatibility of pesticides with the acaropathogenic fungus, Fusarium semitectum. In: Sabelis M., Bruin J. (eds) Trends in Acarology. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 493–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9837-5_82
Moino Jr A, Alves SB (1998) Efeito de imidacloprid e fipronil sobre Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. e Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch.) Sorok. e no comportamento de limpeza de Heterotermes tenuis (Hagen). An Soc Entomol Bras 27(4):611–619. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0301-80591998000400014
Mondal M, Ara N (2006) Biology and fecundity of the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) under laboratory condition. J Life Earth Sci 1(2):43–47
Morris ON (1977) Compatibility of 27 chemical insecticides with Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki. Can Entomol 109(6):855–864. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent109855-6
Neves PM, Hirose E, Tchujo PT, Moino JRAL (2001) Compatibility of entomopathogenic fungi with neonicotinoid insecticides. Neotrop Entomol 30(2):263–268. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2001000200009
Niassy S, Maniania NK, Subramanian S, Gitonga ML, Maranga R, Obonyo AB, Ekesi S (2012) Compatibility of Metarhizium anisopliae isolate ICIPE 69 with agrochemicals used in French bean production. Int J Pest Manag 58(2):131–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2012.669078
Oliveira CN, Neves PM, Kawazoe LS (2003) Compatibility between the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana and insecticides used in coffee plantations. Sci Agric 60(4):663–667. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162003000400009
Oliveira RC, Neves PM (2004) Compatibility of Beauveria bassiana with acaricides. Neotrop Entomol 33(3):353–358. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2004000300013
Pandey S, Singh DK (2004) Total bacterial and fungal population after chlorpyrifos and quinalphos treatments in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) soil. Chemosphere 55(2):197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.10.014
Paula AR, Carolino AT, Paula CO, Samuels RI (2011) The combination of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae with the insecticide Imidacloprid increases virulence against the dengue vector Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Parasit Vectors 4(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-8
Pelizza SA, Schalamuk S, Simón MR, Stenglein SA, Pacheco-Marino SG, Scorsetti AC (2018) Compatibility of chemical insecticides and entomopathogenic fungi for control of soybean defoliating pest. Rachiplusia Nu Rev Argent Microbiol 50(2):189–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2017.06.002
Qasim M, Lin Y, Dash CK, Bamisile BS, Ravindran K, Islam SU, Ali H, Wang F, Wang L (2018) Temperature-dependent development of Asian citrus psyllid on various hosts, and mortality by two strains of Isaria. Microb Pathog 119:109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.04.019
Qasim M, Ronliang J, Islam W, Ali H, Khan KA, Dash CK, Jamal ZA, Wang L (2021a) Comparative pathogenicity of four entomopathogenic fungal species against nymphs and adults of citrus red mite on the citrus plantation. Int J Trop Insect Sci 41(1):737–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-020-00263-z
Qasim M, Xiao H, He K, Omar MA, Hussain D, Noman A, Rizwan M, Khan KA, Al-Zoubi OM, Alharbi SA, Wang L (2021b) Host-pathogen interaction between Asian citrus psyllid and entomopathogenic fungus (Cordyceps fumosorosea) is regulated by modulations in gene expression, enzymatic activity and HLB-bacterial population of the host. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 248:109112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2021.109112
Rashid M, Baghdadi A, Sheikhi A, Pourian HR, Gazavi M (2010) Compatibility of Metarhizium anisopliae (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) with several insecticides. J Plant Prot Res 50(1):22–27. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10045-010-0004-6
Ribeiro LP, Blume E, Bogorni PC, Dequech ST, Brand SC, Junges E (2012) Compatibility of Beauveria bassiana commercial isolate with botanical insecticides utilized in organic crops in southern Brazil. Biol Agric Hortic 28(4):223–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2012.735088
Rivero-Borja M, Guzmán-Franco AW, Rodríguez-Leyva E, Santillán-Ortega C, Pérez-Panduro A (2018) Interaction of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae with chlorpyrifos ethyl and spinosad in Spodoptera frugiperda larvae. Pest Manag Sci 74(9):2047–2052. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4884
Rossi-Zalaf LS, Alves SB, Lopes RB, Silveira Neto S, Tanzini MR (2008) Interação de microrganismos com outros agentes de controle de pragas e doenças. In: Alves SB, Lopes RB (eds) Controle microbiano de pragas na América Latina: avanços e desafios, vol 14. FEALQ. Piracicaba, SP, pp 270–302
Saxena P, Shah NK, Hasan N, Pandey KC, Faruqui SA, Bhaskar RB, Padmavati C, Roy S, Azmi MI, Singh JB (2002) Forage plant protection. ICAR-IGFRI, Jhansi. https://www.igfri.res.in/pdf/old_bulletins/forage_crop_protections.pdf Accessed 21 January, 2018
Shan LT, Wang ZL, Ying SH, Feng MG (2010) Hydrophobicity-related protein contents and surface areas of aerial conidia are useful traits for formulation design of fungal biocontrol agents. Mycopathologia 169(6):483–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-010-9283-8
Sharma A, Kumar V, Shahzad B, Tanveer M, Sidhu GP, Handa N, Kohli SK, Yadav P, Bali AS, Parihar RD, Dar OI (2019) Worldwide pesticide usage and its impacts on ecosystem. SN Appl Sci 1(11):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1485-1
Tawfiq MA, Isra WS (2013) The effects of three acaricides on egg hatchability of three populations of the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: tetranychidae). Jordan Agric Sci 9(3):343–350
Wari D, Okada R, Takagi M, Yaguchi M, Kashima T, Ogawara T (2020) Augmentation and compatibility of Beauveria bassiana with pesticides against different growth stages of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius); an in vitro and field approach. Pest Manag Sci 76(9):3236–3252. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5881
Widenfalk A, Bertilsson S, Sundh I, Goedkoop W (2008) Effects of pesticides on community composition and activity of sediment microbes–responses at various levels of microbial community organization. Environ Pollut 152(3):576–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.07.003
Yadav DS, Ranade Y, Mhaske S, Ghule S (2019) Compatibility of insecticides with Metarhizium brunneum (Petch) and Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) for bio-intensive management of pink mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) in grapes. J Biol Control 33(3):253–263. https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2019/22728
Yanagawa A, Chabaud MA, Imai T, Marion-Poll F (2018) Olfactory cues play a significant role in removing fungus from the body surface of Drosophila melanogaster. J Invertebr Pathol 151:144–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2017.11.011
Younas A, Wakil W, Khan Z, Shaaban M, Prager SM (2017) The efficacy of Beauveria bassiana, jasmonic acid and chlorantraniliprole on larval populations of Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea crop ecosystems. Pest Manag Sci 73(2):418–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4297
Yucel C (2021) Effects of local isolates of Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin on the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Koch)(Acari: Tetranychidae). Egypt J Biol Pest Control 31(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-021-00409-2
Zhang X, Jin D, Zou X, Guo J (2016) Laboratory and field evaluation of an entomopathogenic fungus, Isaria cateniannulata strain 08XS-1, against Tetranychus urticae (Koch). Pest Manag Sci 72(5):1059–1066. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4233
Zhang XN, Guo JJ, Zou X, Jin DC (2018) Pathogenic differences of the entomopathogenic fungus Isaria cateniannulata to the spider mite Tetranychus urticae (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) and its predator Euseius nicholsi (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae). Exp Appl Acarol 75(1):69–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-018-0247-x
Zhang XN, Jin DC, Zou X, Guo JJ, Qu JJ (2014) Screening of highly virulent strain of Isaria cateniannulata against Tetranychus urticae and its effect to Euseius nicholsi. J Environ Entomol 36(3):372–380
Acknowledgements
Department of Microbiology and Department of Entomology, PAU are thanked for all the research facilities and funding. Dr. Neelam Joshi and Dr. Manpreet Brar Bhullar are thanked for their expert guidance, assistance and support for the research work regarding Tetranychus urticae. We are also thankful to Dr. B. K. Kang for his assistance with concentrations of insecticide actives. We are grateful to Guru Nanak College, Ferozepur Cantt for timely support and facilities.
Funding
Department of Microbiology and Department of Entomology, PAU are thanked for all the associated funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not Applicable.
Consent to participate
Not Applicable.
Consent for publication
Not Applicable.
Conflicts of interest/Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest/competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, N., Joshi, N. Toxicological behavior of entomopathogenic fungi with insecticides: in vitro growth efficacies and conidial processes on mite cuticle. Int J Trop Insect Sci 42, 1639–1647 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-021-00685-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-021-00685-3