Abstract
In-vitro mechanical indentation experimentation is performed on bulk liver tissue of lamb to characterize its nonlinear material behaviour. The material response is characterized by a visco-hyperelastic material model by the use of 2-dimensional inverse finite element (FE) analysis. The time-dependent behaviour is characterized by the viscoelastic model represented by a 4-parameter Prony series, whereas the large deformations are modelled using the hyperelastic Neo-Hookean model. The shear response described by the initial and final shear moduli and the corresponding Prony series parameters are optimized using ANSYS with the Root Mean Square (RMS) error being the objective function. Optimized material properties are validated using experimental results obtained under different loading histories. To study the efficacy of a 2D model, a three dimensional (3D) model of the specimen is developed using Micro-CT of the specimen. The initial elastic modulus of the lamb liver obtained was found to 13.5 kPa for 5% indentation depth at a loading rate of 1 mm/sec for 1-cycle. These properties are able to predict the response at 8.33% depth and a loading rate of 5 mm/sec at multiple cycles with reasonable accuracy.
Article highlights
-
The visco-hyperelastic model accurately models the large displacement as well as the time-dependent behaviour of the bulk liver tissue.
-
Mapped meshing of the 3D FE model saves computational time and captures localized displacement in an accurate manner.
-
The 2D axisymmetric model while predicting the force response of the bulk tissue, cannot predict the localized deformations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Many biological tissues exhibit time dependent material response and undergo large deformations which need be characterized by viscoelastic and hyperelastic material models respectively. Tensile testing requires standalone specimens and cannot predict localized response [1]. Indentation offers a non-destructive way of testing in-situ and in-vivo specimens and is particularly advantageous for testing tissues. Many studies on biological tissues are performed on animal organs due to the lack of availability of human tissues. However, certain researchers did perform experiments on human tissues. Basdogan [2] used in-vitro dynamic testing on human liver, Liu et al. [3] used static indentation in human breast tissue and Lim et al. [4] performed in-situ experiments on human liver in both static and dyamic mode. The main objective is to distinguish between health and diseased organs. Mazza et al. [5, 6] compared diseased and healthy human livers using invivo aspiration experiments while Reiter et al. [7] used various experimental techniques to study hepatic fibrosis in human livers.
Compared to human tissues, the work on animal tissues is much more widespread. Samur et al. [8] have reported that the data obtained from the tests performed on live animals contain heavy noise due to breathing and other internal processes of the body. Hence, data obtained on corpses provide much stable data. Both dynamic [9, 10] using mechanical stimulators and static loading were used by researchers. Indenters of spherical [11] and cylindrical [12] shape are commonly used on account of their symmetry while damage studies are usually done using mechanical graspers [13]. Among soft tissues, brain tissue characterization is relevant for studying regions of cognitive development [14], diseases such as tumors [15] and response to various types of injury [16, 17]. However, the liver is highly affected by toxicity and hence has the highest number of mechanical studies. Fu et al. [18] performed tension and compression studies on porcine livers while Jordan et al. [19] used indentation. To prevent damage to tissues, tissue constructs and other artificial materials such as soft gels and rubbers which show a similar type of mechanical response as that of tissues are studied [20, 21]. The advantage with these materials is that they can be tailored to any shape for testing.
When it comes to material models describing the response of soft tissues, hyperelastic and viscoelastic time dependent models are commonly used. Martins et al. [22] provided a comparative study of various hyperelastic models applied to biological tissues. The hyperelastic models generally used are Blatz model [23], Arruda Boyce model [24], logarithmic and polynomial models [25], exponential model [26], Ogden model [27] etc. The applicability of a material model depends upon the amount of deformation that the tissue undergoes during mechanical testing. Liu et al. [28] developed properties for large deformation studies using a nonlinear viscoelastic model. Valtorta et al. [29] proposes that the assumption of homogeneity and isotropy holds good for bulky organs like liver and kidney, which have limited or no reinforcement by muscular fibres. The use of finite element (FE) analysis has been prevalent as of late, with inverse FE analysis being a tool for optimization. Some of the studies using this method were done by Hu et al. [30] on pig liver and Schwartz et al. [31] on deer liver. 3D modelling using imaging techniques such as CT scans [32] and 3D ultrasound imaging [19] are generally used for specimen that are of non-standard shape.
In this work, in-vitro indentation is performed using a spherical tip indenter on lamb liver specimens under static loading using a Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer (DMA). Inverse FE analysis is performed using a visco-hyperelastic 2D model in ANSYS software. Optimization of material parameters is done by minimizing the RMS error of the material response force between experimental and FE results. 3D models of the tissue samples are developed using an imaging technique on 2D scans obtained by Micro-CT imaging of the samples. FE analysis is performed on the 3D models using the optimized material properties to compare the shear response of the 2D and 3D models.
In this article, the sample preparation, experimentation and development of 3D models from the Micro-CT scans is explained in detail in the Sect. 2: ‘Method’ and the material models describing the material response, the development of 2D and 3D FE models and the optimization technique used are described under Sect. 3: ‘Theory’. The ‘Results’ are explained in Sect. 4, followed by ‘Discussion’ and ‘Conclusion’ in Sects. 5 and 6 respectively.
2 Method
The in-vitro indentation experimental procedure begins with the preparation of the specimen for the test. After the specimen is prepared, displacement control tests, where in a displacement is applied and the resultant force is measured are performed.
2.1 Specimen preparation
Whole liver of a Katahdin lamb is procured within an hour of slaughter and removal from the local grocery and stored in salt solution to maintain its moisture and prevent it from drying out. Then a circular piece of specimen is cut from the whole liver using a circular cutter whose diameter is almost the same as that of the glass beaker used to hold the specimen (80 mm). The cut specimen exactly fits the beaker as shown in Fig. 1. This sample is stored in salt water solution before and in between tests.
2.2 Experimental setup for displacement control testing using DMA
The setup of the liver indentation on the DMA is shown in Fig. 2. The liver is placed in a transparent glass beaker with markings along its circumference to identify the location tested. The indenter is programmed to indent the material at a specified indentation rate up to a certain depth and hold its position at that depth for a certain amount of time. When the displacement is held constant, stress relaxation occurs in the material. The corresponding reaction force exerted by the specimen is measured by the DMA. A number of indentation rates and depths are tried out on various specimens.
2.3 Development of 3-dimensional model
The specimen tested along with the beaker and indenter is placed in an acrylic chamber and placed in a Micro-CT chamber for scanning. The specimen is rotated 360° about its vertical axis; as such, the X-rays are projected from every direction through its thickness and a scan of a layer of the specimen (slice) is obtained. The slice thickness was set at 0.24 mm. The slices thus obtained using Micro-CT are stacked up over one another using Medical Imaging software developed at CVIP Laboratory, University of Louisville to obtain the actual shape of the specimen. A detailed explanation for the development of a 3D model is beyond the scope of this paper. The completed specimen is shown in Fig. 3.
3 Theory
3.1 Viscoelastic and Hyperelastic material models
A linear viscoelastic constitutive material model can be specified in ANSYS using two time-dependent material functions—the shear modulus G(t) and the bulk modulus K(t). It is typically observed for most time dependent materials that the bulk modulus is not very time-dependent [33]. As such, this study assumes that the bulk modulus is constant (i.e. K(t) = K0). The elastic shear modulus at time t = 0 (G0) is then used to evaluate K0 via the elastic relationship
Poisson’s ratio is equal 0.5 for incompressible materials. For this study, the Poisson’s ratio \(\vartheta\) is assumed to be 0.485. This is a pretty decent assumption given that most tissues are closer to the incompressible region. It has to be pointed out here that a value of 0.5 would lead to convergence issues of FE model.
The shear modulus is specified using a Prony series given by:
where G∞ is the shear modulus at t = ∞, N is the number of Prony series terms and Gi and τi are the Prony series coefficients and relaxation times, respectively. The value of ‘N’ is set as 4 for all the analyses. The relaxation times τi are evenly spaced in log time according to the equation:
where τ0 is the base relaxation time (equivalent to that of the first Prony series term τ1) and ‘a’ is a relaxation time multiplier. For any given model solution, these values are provided by the user; a discussion of the effect of these parameters is available elsewhere [34]. The initial value of G0 is assumed from a similar work [35] and G∞ is initially estimated using the equation:
where Fend is the maximum force, i.e. at the end of loading and Fend is the force at the end of relaxation (i.e. at the end of the experiment). In ANSYS, the Prony series coefficients are provided in terms of normalized values \(\gamma_{i}\) as:
where \(\gamma_{1}\), \(\gamma_{2}\) and \(\gamma_{3}\) and \(\gamma_{4}\) are Prony series coefficients which follow the relationship, \(\gamma_{i}\) values sum to 1. The initial elastic modulus can be determined from the shear modulus and Poisson’s ratio as:
Neo-Hookean hyperelastic model is chosen to model large displacements which describes the strain energy density function as:
where µ is initial shear modulus (same as G0), d is material incompressibility parameter defined as d = 2/K0, J is the ratio of the deformed elastic volume to the reference volume of the materials defined as J = det (Fij), \(\overline{I}_{1}\) is the modified invariant of the first invariant I1 of the deformation tensor Cij defined as: \(\overline{I}_{1} = J^{ - 2/3} I_{1} .\)
3.2 2-dimensional axisymmetric modelling and optimization
In 2D modelling, the specimen is assumed to be flat. The 2D model used for the FE analysis is shown in Fig. 4. The specimen is assumed to be perfectly flat at the top and bottom surfaces and axisymmetric about the vertical axis. The model is built with a thickness of 60 mm to approximate the actual liver specimen (maximum thickness of 80 mm and a minimum thickness of 40 mm). The width of the model is the radius of the beaker used to hold the specimen (42.25 mm). The rigid indenter is modelled as a rigid curve (circular arc with radius of the indenter as 4.76 mm (3/16th inch)) that is translated by displacements specified on a pilot node which is constrained to move vertically only. A progressive mesh with finer elements under the indenter region is used. Contact elements are placed between the indenter and the top surface. The bottom surface of the specimen is constrained in the vertical direction (UY = 0) and the right edge is constrained in the horizontal direction. PLANE183 elements are used with Visco-hyperelastic properties. The total number of substeps used for the solution is 90, 30 for the loading region and 60 for the unloading region. The initial shear modulus (G0 = 4.040 kPa) is calculated from the initial elastic modulus (12 kPa) calculated in a previous study using the DMA [36] and the final shear modulus (G∞) is calculated using Eq. (4). \(\gamma_{1}\), \(\gamma_{2}\) and \(\gamma_{3}\) are initially assumed to be 0.50, 0.25 and 0.125, respectively, which sets \(\gamma_{4}\) = 0.125 and the parameters τ0, a were set at 0.3, 3.2183 respectively [37]. Least squares optimization procedure is adapted here wherein the root mean square (RMS) error between the experimental force response and finite element reaction force response is minimized. The technique was developed by the authors during a previous study and is mentioned in detail in a previously published work [34].
3.3 3-dimensional model in ANSYS
The 3D model developed from the Micro-CT images is then imported into ANSYS software and the irregularities further smoothened out. The loading and boundary conditions remain similar to the axisymmetric model – bottom layer is constrained in the vertical direction and the displacement is applied through a rigid indenter controlled by a pilot node. Additionally, the displacement around the edges is constrained to mimic the effect of the glass beaker. The 3D model obtained is mapped meshed to ensure faster convergence of the solution. The smoothened and meshed 3D model of a liver specimen is shown in Fig. 5. The indenter is made to be rigid and SOLID95 elements are used for the body of the tissue.
4 Results
The test chosen for initial analysis is shown in Fig. 6. The displacement is ramped to a value of 3 mm (5% of thickness) at a rate of 1 mm/sec and held constant for a period of 10 s before removal. The response during removal of displacement is not considered.
After optimization, the properties obtained are shown in Table 1. The best set of material properties obtained is listed in Table 1. The fit of the FE results with the experimental results is shown in Fig. 7.
Given the goodness of the fit (RMS Error of 0.012 N), the optimized properties (Table 1) are then used to predict the response of the specimen tested at 2 different loading protocols (Fig. 8). One test was performed for 2 cycles at loading and unloading rates of 1 mm/sec with total test duration of 20 s and a maximum indentation depth of 5 mm (8.33% of thickness). The 2nd test had slower loading and unloading rates (0.5 mm/sec) for both cycles with partial unloading. The duration of this test is 25 s with a maximum indentation depth of 5 mm (8.33% of thickness).
The responses of both the tests are predicted using the optimized properties in Table 1 and compared with the experimental values. The predicted force response is shown in Fig. 9.
However, for the 2D model to suffice, the load–displacement relationship at any point on the tissue surface should be identical. The positional dependence is studied by running simulations at 3 different locations on the 3D model (with different local surfaces and thicknesses). The material properties used are obtained from the optimization of the 2D model (Table 1). The results are shown in Fig. 10.
In the next step, the response of the 3D model is studied with the indentation performed at the exact location as in the experiment and the shape of the indentation is visually compared. The indented model along with the scan of the original specimen is shown in Fig. 11.
5 Discussion
The optimization technique with the 2D axisymmetric visco-hyperelastic model consisting of the Prony series and Neo-Hookean model provided a reasonable fit of experimental data with FE data and is able to predict loading at unloading at different loading and unloading rates as well as different indentation depths. When a pure viscoelastic model was used, convergence issues had crept in during the FE analysis at higher deformations. This work is aimed at identifying whether the effort to develop a 3D model for FE analysis can be justified. Given that a 2D model is required for a preliminary analysis, the need for a 3D model is moot given the computational effort required. This study details the complexities, assumptions and limitations involved in the development of a 3D model. Based on the results where the deformation and stresses are localized, it can be concluded that if the object of the study is material property determination, a 3D model for an isotropic homogeneous material is unnecessary. However, for positional dependency of the material response, especially for identification of abnormalities, non-homogeneous materials with anisotropic properties, a 3D model can be justified. The visco-hyperelastic model is able to predict the peak loads with consistency which depends upon the peak elastic modulus is (13.5 kPa), but the fit in the loading and unloading regions had considerable variation especially at different loading rates and indentation depths. This variation can be attributed to the number of Prony series coefficients or a higher order hyperelastic model. The calculated initial elastic modulus (13.5 kPa) with this method compared favourably with some of the other studies in literature (10–15 kPa [2] and 12.88 ± 2.53 kPa [10]). However, given the choice of material model, the amount of strain and displacement used and the parameter reported, it is not uncommon to find the reported elastic modulus values over a wide range of values both under and over the values obtained in this study. For porcine liver, very low values of elastic modulus were predicted by Maettei et al. [38] (2.04 to 2.65 kPa), Orescanin et al. [39] (1.8- 2.4 kPa), Dosaev [40] et al. (1.1 kPa) and Hudnot et al. [37] (0.1 to 0.5 kPa). However, Estermann et al. [36] (29.77 ± 14.79 kPa) and Samur et al. [8] (25 to 37 kPa) predicted higher values. The effect of a mapped mesh in the 3D model considerably reduced the simulation time and convergence issues which where hindering the analysis with a free mesh. The effect of location of the test did have a minor variation, which could become important in case of critical analyses. Thus, it can be stated that the effort required in the development of a functional 3D model of the tissue is worth the effort. When the analyses need to be extended to include anisotropy, the development of a 3D model is of utmost importance.
6 Conclusion
The major purpose of this study is to predict the material behaviour of bulk soft tissues of large deformation using a generalized visco-hyperelastic material model. By using an inverse FE model with an optimization routine, the material parameters of a 4-term prony series and a Neo-Hookean model were identified. It was hypothesized that the data from a single load-hold experiment can be optimized to predict the response for complex loading histories such as load-unload, varying strain rate and multiple loading cycles. The study on a 2D axisymmetric model has proved that it can be predicted with a reasonable amount of accuracy. The study then proceeded towards establishing a relationship between the 2D and 3D FE models for soft tissue study. The 3D model was developed using Micro-CT imaging and analysed using the material properties developed from 2D analysis. It has been observed that the 2D model under-predicted the response of the material when compared with the 3D FE model with the same properties. The deformed surface in the FE model visually compared well with the actual specimen and both show highly localized displacements and stresses (in the case of FE simulation). The development of 3D model is relevant to studying the localized response for abnormality study, but an optimization process on a 3D model can be computationally impractical. One of the major limitations of this study has been the aging of the tissue specimens during experimentation. Achieving the same amount of hydration for the specimen between and during tests has been a challenge and might have contributed to some variation in results. The same could be attributed to variation of elastic modulus values of porcine liver when compared to published works. The liver surface is highly wavy and estimating an average thickness value for the 2D axisymmetric model could be a point of further study. A more accurate study would be to identify the abnormalities in the 3D images and model them as separate entities for FE studies. It would be interesting work to separate the abnormal regions and analyse them as standalone specimens and also in the context of the total specimen while understanding the contact mechanics between them.
Availability of data and material
The experimental data as text is made available as supplementary material.
Code availability
No code is custom built for this work.
References
McKee CT, Last JA, Russell P, Murphy CJ (2011) Indentation versus tensile measurements of young’s modulus for soft biological tissues. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 17(3):155–164
Basdogan C (2012) Dynamic material properties of human and animal livers. In: Payan Y (ed) Soft tissue biomechanical modeling for computer assisted surgery. Studies in mechanobiology, tissue engineering and biomaterials, vol 11. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 229–241
Liu Y, Kerdok AE, Howe RD A nonlinear finite element model of soft tissue indentation. In: Proceedings of medical simulation: international symposium Cambridge, MA, 2004. pp 67–76
Lim Y-J, Deo D, Singh TP, Jones DB, De S (2009) In situ measurement and modeling of biomechanical response of human cadaveric soft tissues for physics-based surgical simulation. Surg Endosc 23:1298–1307
Mazza E, Grau P, Hollenstein M, Bajka M (2008) Constitutive modeling of human liver based on in vivo measurements. Med Image ComputComput Assist Interv 11(2):726–733
Nava A, Mazza E, Furrer M, Villiger P, Reinhart WH (2008) In vivo mechanical characterization of human liver. Med Image Anal 12(2):203–216
Reiter R, Freise C, Johrens K, Kamphues C, Seehofer D, Stockmann M, Somasundaram R, Asbach P, Braun J, Samani A, Sack I (2014) Wideband MRE and static mechanical indentation of human liver specimen: sensitivity of viscoelastic constants to the alteration of tissue structure in hepatic fibrosis. J Biomech 47(7):1665–1674
Samur E, Sedef M, Basdogan C, Avtan L, Duzgun O (2007) A robotic indenter for minimally invasive measurement and characterization of soft tissue response. Med Image Anal 11:361–373
Tay BK, Stylopoulos N, De S, Rattner DW, Srinivasan MA (2002) Measurement of in-vivo force response of intra-abdominal soft tissues for surgical simulation. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 85:514–519
Tay BK, Kim J, Srinivasan MA (2006) In vivo mechanical behavior of intra-abdominal organs. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53(11):2129–2138
Ottensmeyer MP (2001) Minimally invasive instrument for in vivo measurement of solid organ mechanical impedance. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Ahn B, Kim J (2007) An efficient soft tissue characterization method for haptic rendering of soft tissue deformation in medical simulation. IEEE FBIT 11:549–553
Cheng L, Hannaford B (2016) Evaluation of liver tissue damage and grasp stability using finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 19(1):31–40
MacManus DB, Pierrat B, Murphy JG, Gilchrist MD (2017) Region and species dependent mechanical properties of adolescent and young adult brain tissue. Sci Rep 7(1):13729
Stewart DC, Rubiano A, Dyson K, Simmons CS (2017) Mechanical characterization of human brain tumors from patients and comparison to potential surgical phantoms. PLoS ONE 12(6):e0177561
Budday S, Nay R, de Rooij R, Steinmann P, Wyrobek T, Ovaert TC, Kuhl E (2015) Mechanical properties of gray and white matter brain tissue by indentation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 46:318–330
Samadi-Dooki A, Voyiadjis GZ, Stout RW (2017) An indirect indentation method for evaluating the linear viscoelastic properties of the brain tissue. J Biomech Eng 139(6)
Fu YB, Chui CK (2014) Modelling and simulation of porcine liver tissue indentation using finite element method and uniaxial stress strain data. J Biomech 47(10):2430–2435
Jordan P, Socrate S, Zickler TE, Howe RD (2009) Constitutive modeling of porcine liver in indentation using 3D ultrasound imaging. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2(2):192–201
Cox MAJ, Gawlitta D, Driessen NJB, Oomens CWJ, Baaijens FPT (2008) The non-linear mechanical properties of soft engineered biological tissues determined by finite spherical indentation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 11(5):585–592
Moerman KM, Holt CA, Evans SL, Simms CK (2009) Digital image correlation and finite element modelling as a method to determine mechanical properties of human soft tissue in vivo. J Biomech 42(8):1150–1153
Martins PALS, Natal Jorge RM, Ferreira AJM (2006) A Comparative study of several material models for prediction of hyperelastic properties: application to silicone-rubber and soft tissues. Strain 42:135–147
Farshad M, Barbezat M, Flueler P, Schmidlin F, Graber P, Niederer P (1999) Material characterization of the pig kidney in relation with the biomechanical analysis of renal trauma. J Biomech 32:417–425
Samani A, Plewes D (2004) A method to measure the hyperelastic parameters of ex vivo breast tissue samples. Phys Med Biol 49:4395–4405
Chui C, Kobayashi E, Chen X, Hisada T, Sakuma I (2004) Combined compression and elongation experiments and non-linear modelling of liver tissue for surgical simulation. Med Biol Eng Compu 42:787–798
Roan E, Vemaganti R (2007) The nonlinear material properties of liver tissue determined from no-slip uniaxial compression experiments. J Biomech Eng 129(3):450–456
Gao Z, Lister, K., Desai, J.P. (2008) constitutive modeling of liver tissue: experiment and theory. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Scottsdale, AZ
Liu Z, Bilston LE (2002) Large deformation shear properties of liver tissue. Biorheology 39:735–742
Valtorta D, Mazza E (2005) Dynamic measurement of soft tissue viscoelastic properties with a torsional resonator device. Med Image Anal 9:481–490
Hu T, Desai, J.P. (2004) Modeling large deformation in soft-tissues: experimental results and analysis. Paper presented at the Proceedings of EuroHaptics, Munich, Germany
Schwartz JM, Denninger M, Rancourt D, Moisan C, Laurendeau D (2005) Modelling liver tissue properties using a non-linear visco-elastic model for surgery simulation. Med Image Anal 9:103–112
Zhiheng J, Zhijiang, D., Monan, W (2006) A novel finite element method based biomechanical model for HIT-robot assisted orthopedic surgery system. In: IEEE Engg. in Medicine & Biology Society, NY
Ferry JD (1980) Viscoelastic properties of polymers. Wiley, New York
Resapu RR, Nagendran KB, Bradshaw RD (2008) A finite element method for the determination of optimal viscoelastic material properties from indentation tests of polymer film and wire with polymer insulation. Exp Mech 48(6):713–729
Shi H, Farag AA, Fahmi R, Chen D (2008) Validation of finite element models of liver tissue using micro-CT. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55(3):978–984
Estermann S-J, Pahr DH, Reisinger A (2020) Hyperelastic and viscoelastic characterization of hepatic tissue under uniaxial tension in time and frequency domain. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 112:104038
Hudnut AW, Babaei B, Liu S, Larson BK, Mumenthaler SM, Armani AM (2017) Characterization of the mechanical properties of resected porcine organ tissue using optical fiber photoelastic polarimetry. Biomed Opt Exp 8(10):4663–4670
Mattei G, Tirella A, Gallone G, Ahluwalia (2014) A Viscoelastic characterisation of pig liver in unconfined compression. J Biomech 47(11):2641–2646
Orescanin M, Qayyum MF, Toohey KS, Insana MF (2010) Dispersion and shear modulus measurements of porcine liver. Ultrason Imaging 32(4):255–266
Dosaev M, Goryacheva I, Martynenko Y, Morozov A, Antonov F, Su FC, Yeh CH, Ju MS (2015) Application of video-assisted tactile sensor and finite element simulation for estimating Young’s modulus of porcine liver. J Med Biol Eng 35(4):510–516
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr. Hongjian Shi & Prof. Aly A. Farag of the CVIP Laboratory at University of Louisville for their help in 3D imaging and Prof. Michael J. Voor of University of Louisville for providing the necessary imaging equipment.
Funding
The work was supported by University of Louisville, Louisville, USA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Resapu, R.R., Bradshaw, R.D. Application of micro-computer tomography and inverse finite element analysis for characterizing the visco-hyperelastic response of bulk liver tissue using indentation. SN Appl. Sci. 3, 574 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04577-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04577-6