Abstract
Aluminium metal matrix composites are lightweight high-performance materials mostly applicable in aerospace, automobile and marine applications. In this study, the morphological, mechanical and corrosion behaviour of Al7075 metal matrix composites were investigated to find the effect of reinforcement of TiB2 particles for various weight percentage. Al7075-TiB2 composites were developed by reinforcing the 3–5 µm size TiB2 ceramic particles using stir casting process. The particles with different weight percentage of 2, 4, 6 and 8 were uniformly reinforced with the help of the mechanical stirrer. The energy dispersive X-ray diffraction (EDAX) pattern confirms the presence of TiB2 particles in the composites. SEM and optical microstructures clearly revealed the uniform distribution of TiB2 particles in the aluminium matrix. The additions of TiB2 particles enhance the tensile strength and micro hardness due to the strong interface and load sharing between the matrix and the reinforcement particles. Dry sliding wear test was conducted by varying the applied load and sliding distance. SEM microstructure of worn surfaces shows that addition of TiB2 particles decreases the wear rate due to the presence of stiffer and stronger reinforcement particles. The electrochemical potentiodynamic polarization and salt spray test were also conducted to study the corrosion behaviour of the Al-TiB2 composites. SEM microstructures confirm the occurrence of pitting corrosion and shows that addition of TiB2 particles improves the corrosion resistance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Aluminium metal matrix composites have emerged as an important class of materials due to its wide application in aerospace, automobile, structural and marine engineering. In recent decades the particle reinforced metal matrix composites have been considered as a high-performance material and shows outstanding physical and mechanical properties. Nowadays these composites are replacing the applications of conventional aluminium alloys due to its superior properties such as high strength to weight ratio, high wear resistance and low thermal expansion.1,2 Aluminium alloys are most commonly used metallic materials as a matrix for the production of composites. When compared with lightweight alloys such as magnesium and titanium, aluminium alloys are cheap and can be easily processed. The important properties of aluminium alloys are high strength, good ductility and high corrosion resistance in conjunction the properties can be tailor made to satisfy various requirements.3,4 Considering the various aluminium alloys, age hardening grades (2xxx, 6xxx and 7xxx) are preferred as matrix material because it allows further improvement in mechanical properties by various age hardening treatment.5,6
The mechanical and tribological properties can be enhanced by reinforcing the ceramic particles.7 The various manufacturing techniques available for producing metal matrix composites are stir casting; powder metallurgy; squeeze casting and friction stir process, etc. Among the various available techniques stir casting is the most widely used manufacturing process because of its uniqueness in homogeneous mixing and also it can be produced economically in large scale.8 Reinforcing the ceramic particles in aluminium alloys activates the strengthening mechanisms such as grain refinement; increase in dislocation density caused by thermal incompatibilities between the matrix and reinforcement particles; facilitate load sharing from matrix to reinforcement particles.9,10 The commonly reinforced ceramic particles in aluminium matrix composites are SiC, Al2O3, B4C, TiC, TiB2, etc.11,12,13,14,15,16 These ceramic particles increase the mechanical properties (tensile, hardness and wear resistance) but there arises incompatible in processing the composites. So it is difficult to produce the morphologically defect-free composites to harvest the maximum increase in properties. When SiC is reinforced with aluminium matrix it reacts with aluminium to form a reaction layer at the particle matrix interface. This reaction layer is intermetallic Al4C3 that weakens the mechanical properties of the composites.17 When Al2O3 is reinforced with aluminium matrix, the magnesium present in the form of solid solution in the aluminium matrix reacts with reinforcement particles to form Al2MgO4.18,19
TiB2 is an attractive ceramic material that can be used to reinforce the aluminium matrix to improve the mechanical, wear and corrosion characteristics.20,21,22,23 TiB2 is thermodynamically stable in molten aluminium thus it facilitate the liquid state processing of Al-TiB2 composites production. So TiB2 will not react with molten aluminium to form any brittle products that impairs the mechanical properties of the composites.24 When compared with other common reinforcement particles TiB2 is captured by the molten aluminium thereby activates the dispersion strengthening mechanism.25 Aluminium TiB2 composites have excellent properties and most commonly used in cutting tools, crucibles, wear and impact resistant applications. However it is mainly used for structural and functional applications in aerospace, defence, marine and automotive industries.26 Recently the tensile, hardness, wear and corrosion characteristics of aluminium metal matrix composites have been emerged as an important research fields due to its wide applications in various industries. So, in this study the different weight percentage of micron size TiB2 particles were reinforced in Al7075 by stir casting process. The effects of addition of TiB2 particles in the tensile properties, hardness, wear and corrosion characteristics of Al7075-TiB2 composites were investigated.
Materials and Methodology
Materials
Al7075 was used as the matrix material due to its excellent mechanical properties, wear and corrosion resistance applications. The major alloying elements are zinc, magnesium and copper with chemical composition shown in Table 1.
TiB2 is a ceramic material with high strength used as a reinforcement material with chemical composition shown in Table 2. The physical and mechanical properties are shown in Table 3.27 The SEM micrograph and EDS (Energy dispersive spectroscopy) of TiB2 particles are shown in Figures 1 and 2.
Stir Casting Process
TiB2 particles were reinforced with Al7075 matrix materials with the help of the stir casting process. Al7075 were placed in the graphite crucible and heated up to 800°C to get the molten metal using electric resistance furnace.24 TiB2 particles with average size of 3–5 µm were preheated at 850°C. Laser scattering analyses were used to find the average size of TiB2 particles as shown in Figure 3. The stir casting facility consist of various parts such as powder injection system, agitator made of titanium, resistant furnace, thermocouples and graphite crucible as shown in Figure 4. TiB2 particles with different weight percentage of 2, 4, 6 and 8% were added to get the different composites. Stirrer with speed of 350 rpm is used to mix the reinforcement particles with molten metal for about 30 minutes to obtain the homogeneous mixture. The mixture has been poured into the mould cavity with cavity dimensions 100 × 100 × 12 mm as shown in Figure 5. Then it is allowed to cool by keeping the mould at room temperature. A sample specimen is shown in Figure 6 after solidification.
Material Characterization
The properties of new materials can be characterized by conducting microstructural analysis. The specimens were prepared for Al7075 and Al7075-TiB2 composites as per the standard metallographic procedure. The specimen surfaces were prepared by polishing with different grades of emery sheet with grit size ranging from 400 to 1200. Fine polishing was carried out by polishing machine using velvet cloth. Finally, the specimens were etched by Keller’s reagent (95 mL H2O, 2.5 mL HNO3, 1.5 mL HCl, 1.0 mL HF). The effects of reinforcement particles on porosity content of the composites were studied. The SEM analyses were carried out to find the dispersion of the TiB2 particles. The optical microstructures were observed to reveal the TiB2 particle distribution and grain size. The mechanical properties were characterized to evaluate the tensile, hardness and wear characteristics of the composites. In addition to that corrosion test were also conducted to find the effect of addition of TiB2 particles in corrosion rate.
Results and Discussion
Density Characteristics
The density is an important physical property that may influence the mechanical properties of materials. The density gets affected by casting process and reinforcement particles. Thus, the porosity of composites is comparatively more with respect to non-reinforced alloy. The experimental density is measured using the densitometer apparatus as shown in Figure 7. The theoretical density of composites is calculated by rule of mixture using the Eqn. (1)
where ρt, theoretical density of composite; ρm, theoretical density of matrix material; ρr, theoretical density of reinforcement particle.
The theoretical vs experimental density for pure aluminium and various TiB2 reinforced composites is shown in Figure 8. The experimental density of aluminium gets affected due to the manufacturing defects associated with casting approach even though the degassing process was carried out by adding the wetting agents like borax, magnesium and TiK2F6 to the melt. The high temperature for making the molten metal introduces porosity, shrinkages and slag inclusion in the aluminium. The porosity in the composites increased due to various sources. The stirring process is used to distribute the reinforcement particle homogeneously in the aluminium matrix. This process also controls the agglomeration of particles during the increase in reinforcement contents. But this stirring process introduces gas inside the molten metal. This entrapped gas during solidification is the main reason for the porosity.14 The other reasons are increase in the contact surface area due to the presence of reinforcement particle in the molten metal, creation of pore nucleation near the ceramic particle locations.
Microstructure of Al7075-TiB2 Composites
The SEM micrograph of as-cast base material (Al7075) is shown in Figure 9. In general there has been no indication of casting defects like porosity, shrinkages or slag inclusion in the SEM micrograph.
The SEM micrograph of composites (Al7075-TiB2) with different amount of TiB2 reinforcements (2%, 4%, 6% and 8%) is shown in Figure 10. The reinforcement particles are homogeneously distributed in Al7075-TiB2 composites without showing any sign of particle clusters. The wettability of the matrix material and reinforcement particles hinders the dislocation of the TiB2 particles. This makes the particles to stay on suspended for long time during solidification to get homogeneous distribution.28,29 This particle also prevents the dislocation movement of matrix material by dispersion strengthening mechanism which in turn increases the mechanical properties of Al7075-TiB2 composites.
The optical micrograph of as-cast base material Al7075 alloy used as matrix material is shown in Figure 11. The micrograph consists of dendritic structure as formed due to the high rate of cooling (super cooling) during solidification. The dendritic structure consists of elongated α-Al dendritic arms and average spacing between the arms is 40–50 µm. The presence of major alloying elements of Al7075 such as Zn, Mg and Cu is found to be higher than their solubility limit which results in formation of intermetallic phases.
The optical micrographs of stir casted composites with different amount of TiB2 reinforcement are shown in Figure 12. The contents of reinforcement particles increases in accordance with the addition of TiB2 particles in molten aluminium during stir casting process. Average grain size is measured using the intercept technique. A random straight line is drawn though the micrograph. The numbers of grain boundaries intersecting the line are counted. The average grain size is found by dividing the number of intersections by the actual line length.
where actual line length = measured length divided by magnification
It is also clear that the reduction in grain size is observed for increase in weight percentage of reinforcement particles. The average grain size for 2%, 4%, 6% and 8% TiB2 particles reinforced is 45, 36, 26 and 20 µm. This could be due to the resistance offered to the growth of α-Al by TiB2 particles during solidification process. This leads to grain refinement in dendritic structure of as-cast Al7075-TiB2 particles. The TiB2 particles act as a nucleus surrounded by α-Al grains on solidification. The entire micrograph consists of larger region of soft α-al and the presence of few hard TiB2 particles. When the TiB2 particles content is increased more nucleation sites are created during solidification. This creates enhanced resistance to grain growth of α-Al resulting in very fine grains28 (Figure 12).
Tensile Properties
Aluminium materials possess lower tensile strength and very good ductility. When aluminium matrix is reinforced with TiB2 particles the tensile properties like yield strength and ultimate tensile strength gets enhanced without significant drop in elongation percentage. The tensile test has been conducted using Instron universal testing machine with load capacity of 50 kN. The dog bone-shaped specimens were prepared for Al7075 and various TiB2 reinforced composites as per ASTM Standard E8.30 Load vs deflection curve has been recorded for the cross head deflection of 2 mm/min. For each composites five specimens were tested and the average values of tensile properties are listed in Table 4.
The tensile properties of the Al7075-TiB2 composites enhances in accordance with the addition of reinforcement particles.15 The yield strength, ultimate tensile strength increases linearly for all the compositions as shown in Figure 13. But the percentage elongation gets affected with minimum degradation for 2% TiB2 and then it increases marginally for 4%, 6% and 8% as shown in Figure 14.
The increase in tensile properties is due to the reinforcement of TiB2 particles. The TiB2 particles in the aluminium matrix refine the grains during solidification based on the Hall–Petch relation.31 This refined grain is the main cause for the improvement in strength, percentage elongation and toughness of the composites. These grain boundaries act as obstacles for dislocation movement. The other reasons are orowan strengthening mechanism. The residual stresses caused by the difference in thermal expansion co-efficient of reinforcement particles and aluminium matrix creates high dislocation densities in the interface region.32
Micro Hardness
The micro Vickers hardness test was conducted by making indentation in the composites. A dead weight of 300 gram with diamond shape indenter was used to make the indentation for about 30 seconds. The hardness value was calculated by measuring the diagonals of the impression made on the composites by the indenter as shown in Figure 15. For each composite five values were taken for reliability in the measured values.
Aluminium matrix is soft but TiB2 particles are harder. Due to the reinforcement of the hard TiB2 particles into ductile matrix and strong interface between the matrix and reinforcement particles strengthen the composite. During the hardness test the indenter load gets shared between the matrix and the hard reinforcement particles is the cause for the increases the hardness. The average micro hardness values of five samples for each different composite are shown in Figure 16. The hardness of the Al7075-TiB2 composites increases in accordance with the addition of TiB2 particles. There is a significant increase in hardness for Al7075-8% TiB2 composites and it shows hardness can be drastically improved for the higher weight percentage of TiB2 particles.
Wear Characteristics
Wear test was carried out using computerized wear testing pin on disc machine. Dry sliding wear test was conducted for as-cast Al7075 and Al7075-TiB2 composites with various wt% (2, 4, 6 and 8) of TiB2 reinforcement particles. The test samples with 8mm diameter and 32mm length cylindrical pins were prepared by machining from the cast blank. Prior to testing, the pin and disc surface were cleaned with acetone. Wear tests were carried out in the load range of 5, 10 and 15 N at a constant speed of 415 rpm, sliding speed 1 m/s and by varying (1000 m, 1500 m and 2000 m) the sliding distance. During testing the pin is kept stationary and perpendicular to the circular rotating disc The specimen were supposed to rub against the EN31 steel disc of hardness 70HRC (attached to the pin on disc wear test machine) by applying the load that acts as a counter weight and balances the pin as shown in Figure 17.33 The pin was weighted before and after testing to find the wear loss. For each composite three specimens were tested for reliability in the measured values.
The wear test results for different loading conditions like 5 N, 10 N and 15 N for Al7075 and various Al7075-TiB2 composites is obtained. The wear vs time for Al7075 and Al7075-TiB2 composites is shown in Figure 18 to compare the wear due to reinforcement particles. The higher wear rate is observed during the initial stage of wear test due to the absence of roughness projections. After some time the wear rate decreases due to the worn of matrix materials and expose of reinforcement particles. The wear rate keep on reduces due to the formation of protective layer in between the pin and counter surface after crushing of reinforcement particles. Fe3O4, Fe and minute fractured particles of the TiB2 form a layer between the work hardened pin and the counter face and reduces the wear.34 From the graph it is clear wear increases with increase in applied load. In addition to that, the wear decreases with increase in reinforcement particles. It also confirmed that composites are better in wear resistance.
The SEM micrograph of worn surfaces of Al7075 for the applied load of 15 N is shown in Figure 19. The wear pattern is clearly exposed with the deformation and presence of grooves parallel to the sliding direction.35 These grooves are formed due to the ploughing action of hard asperities present on the steel counter face in-between the pin and disc. The Al7075 shows deep grooves and maximum deformation compared to the composites.
The SEM micrograph of worn surfaces of aluminium composites for the applied load of 15 N is shown in Figure 20. The worn surface of the composites possesses smoother and shallow grooves. This shows that the composites are very good in wear resistance.
Corrosion Characteristics
The corrosion characteristics of Al7075-TiB2 composites were studied by conducting two different corrosion test methods namely potentiodynamic polarization resistance and salt spray corrosion test. The potentiodynamic polarization resistance measurements were carried out for as-cast Al7075 and Al7075-TiB2 composites with various wt% (2, 4, 6 and 8) of TiB2 reinforcement particles. The test was performed in 3.5 wt.% NaCl mixed with distilled water medium. It is polished with different emery sheets with grit size ranges from 400 to 1200. Fine polishing was also performed with polishing machine. For each composite three specimens were tested for reliability in the measured values.
The polarization plot for Al7075 and Al7075-TiB2 composites is shown in Figures 21 and 22 respectively. The corrosion parameters like corrosion potential, current density for the samples are listed in Table 5. Faraday’s law was used to calculate the corrosion rate using the current density as shown in Table 5. From the table it is clear that corrosion rate were decreased for increase in the weight percentage of TiB2 particles.
Corrosion test was also conducted using salt spray corrosion test for Al7075 and Al7075-TiB2 composites. The samples with dimensions 50 × 20 × 10 mm were prepared as per ASTM Standard B117M.36 Similarly the specimens were polished with different emery sheets with grit size ranges from 400 to 1200. Fine polishing was also performed with polishing machine. The specimens were cleaned by dipping in 70% nitric acid and 30% water in room temperature. Then the specimens were degreased with acetone and then rinsed in distilled water before it gets immersed in the solution. For each composite three specimens were tested for reliability in the measured values. Salt spray test was performed by 3.5% NaCl mixed with distilled water. The specimens were tied using nylon wire and then immersed in the closed salt spray chamber as shown in Figure 23. The salt water is sprayed continuously for 48 h and the fog developed inside the chamber.
The corrosion results were evaluated by weight loss and the corrosion rate was calculated by the following Eqns. (2) and (3). The corrosion rate with respect to the addition of TiB2 particles is shown in Figure 24. This clearly shows the corrosion resistance gets increased by increase in TiB2 particles.
Corrosion resistance of composites increases with increase in TiB2 particles Even though there are various corrosion mechanisms available but these composites are largely affected by pitting corrosion. Pitting corrosion occurs when the cathode (damaged layer) is large and the anode (exposed metal) is small. Typically the surface protection layer or film becomes the cathode when it is damaged and cracked. A small area of metal is then exposed and becomes the anodic. The SEM micrograph of Al7075 corroded surface is shown in Figure 25.
SEM micrograph of corroded surface of aluminium composites is shown in Figure 26. The NaCl reacts with aluminium metal and the white rust forms on the surfaces.37,38,39 The material surfaces undergo localized attack by chloride and at the same time show signs of nucleation and growth of a new layer of Al(OH)3. Aluminium hydroxide is not soluble and precipitates as a white gelatinous mass, normally called alumina although it is generally bayerite (α- Al(OH)3 β-Al(OH)3).40
The formation of the oxide film on the alloy surface occurs gradually resulting in the initial increase in corrosion rate with respect to time. With the formation of the protective film, increase in corrosion rate ceases. At a certain stage the protective oxide film undergoes rupture, when the film breakage is faster than the rate of repassivation which leads to relatively constant corrosion rate with respect to time. This rupture phenomenon is assumed to have occurred due to residual tension created between the oxide film layer and aluminium matrix.
Conclusion
Al7075-TiB2 composites were synthesized by reinforcing the different weight percentage of TiB2 particles by using stir casting process. The following conclusions were made
-
1.
The porosity of the composites increases due to the addition of TiB2 particles. This is due to the stirring action which introduce the gas during the casting process; increase in the contact surface area due to the presence of reinforcement particle in the molten metal and creation of pore nucleation near the ceramic particle locations.
-
2.
Optical microstructure of Al7075-TiB2 composites shows the uniform distribution of reinforced TiB2 particles within the matrix material without any particles agglomeration. The reduction in grain size is observed for increase in weight percentage of TiB2 reinforcement particles.
-
3.
The tensile properties like yield strength and ultimate tensile strength gets increased without any significant drop in the percentage elongation. This is due to the grain size reduction; increase in dislocation density makes the interaction between the matrix and reinforcement particle is the cause for increase in tensile properties.
-
4.
The hardness increases due to the reinforcement of the hard TiB2 particles into ductile matrix and strong interface between the matrix and reinforcement particles strengthen the composite. During the hardness test the indenter load gets shared between the matrix and the hard reinforcement particles is the cause for the increases the hardness.
-
5.
The wear decreases with increase in reinforcement particles. The wear rate keep on reduces due to the formation of protective layer in between the pin and counter surface after crushing of reinforcement particles. It is also confirmed that composites are better in resistance to wear.
-
6.
From the corrosion test it is observed that the corrosion resistance of the composites gets improved by the formation of protective film avoids pitting formation in the surface of the Al7075-TiB2 composites.
Data Availability
The raw processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also forms part of an ongoing study.
References
T. Dursun, C. Soutis, Recent developments in advanced aircraft aluminium alloys. Mater. Des. (1980–2015) 56, 862–871 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.002
J. Suresh Kumar, K. Kalaichelvan, Taguchi-grey multi-response optimization on structural parameters of honeycomb core sandwich structure for low velocity impact test. SILICON 10, 879–889 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-016-9544-3
R. Gecu, A. Karaaslan, Sliding wear of the Ti-reinforced al matrix Bi-metal composite: a potential replacement to conventional SiC-reinforced composites for automotive application. Int. Metalcast. 13, 641–652 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-018-0281-9
M. Manoj, G.R. Jinu, T. Muthuramalingam, Multi response optimization of AWJM process parameters on machining TiB2 particles reinforced Al7075 composite using Taguchi-DEAR methodology. SILICON 10(5), 2287–2293 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-018-9763-x
M.F. Ibrahim, G.H. Garza-Elizondo, A.M. Samuel, F.H. Samuel, Optimizing the heat treatment of high-strength 7075-type wrought alloys: a metallographic study. Int. Metalcast. 10, 264–275 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-016-0038-2
J. Joseph, B.S. Pillai, J. Jayanandan, J. Jayagopan, S. Nivedh, U.S.S. Balaji, K.V. Shankar, Mechanical behaviour of age hardened A356/TiC metal matrix composite. Pap. Present. Mater. Today Proc. 38, 2127–2132 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.013
V. Anilkumar, K.V. Shankar, M. Balachandran, J. Joseph, S. Nived, J. Jayanandan, J. Jayagopan, U.S. Surya Balaji, Impact of heat treatment analysis on the wear behaviour of Al–14.2Si–0.3Mg–TiC composite using response surface methodology. Tribol. Ind. (2021). https://doi.org/10.24874/ti.988.10.20.04
P. Ajay Kumar, P. Rohatgi, D. Weiss, 50 Years of foundry-produced metal matrix composites and future opportunities. Int. Metalcast. 14, 291–317 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-019-00375-4
C. Wang, M. Wang, B. Yu, D. Chen, P. Qin, M. Feng, Q. Dai, The grain refinement behavior of TiB2 particles prepared with in situ technology. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 459(1–2), 238–243 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.01.013
C. Mallikarjuna, S.M. Shashidhara, U.S. Mallik, K.I. Parashivamurthy, Grain refinement and wear properties evaluation of aluminum alloy 2014 matrix-TiB2 in situ composites. Mater. Des. 32(6), 3554–3559 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.01.036
U. Aybarç, O. Ertuğrul, M.O. Seydibeyoğlu, Effect of Al2O3 particle size on mechanical properties of ultrasonic-assisted stir-casted Al A356 matrix composites. Int. Metalcast. 15, 638–649 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-020-00490-7
M. Manoj, G.R. Jinu, T. Muthuramalingam, R. Leo Bright Singh, Synthetization and investigation on mechanical characteristics of aluminium alloy 7075 with TiB2 composite. J. Ceram. Process. Res 22(4), 475–481 (2021). https://doi.org/10.36410/jcpr.2021.22.4.475
S. Kumar, M. Chakraborty, V.S. Sarma, B.S. Murty, Tensile and wear behaviour of in situ Al–7Si/TiB2 particulate composites. Wear 265, 134–142 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2007.09.007
M. Shayan, B. Eghbali, B. Niroumand, Synthesis and characterization of AA2024–SiO2 nanocomposites through the vortex method. Int. Metalcast. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-021-00574-y
V.S. Ayar, M.P. Sutaria, Development and characterization of In Situ AlSi5Cu3/TiB2 composites. Int. Metalcast. 14, 59–68 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-019-00328-x
D.M. Shinde, P. Sahoo, Influence of speed and sliding distance on the tribological performance of submicron particulate reinforced Al-12Si/15Wt% B4C composite. Int. Metalcast. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-021-00636-1
A. Bhowmik, D. Dey, A. Biswas, Comparative study of microstructure, physical and mechanical characterization of SiC/TiB2 reinforced aluminium matrix composite. SILICON 13(6), 2003–2010 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00591-2
B.F. Schultz, J.B. Ferguson, P.K. Rohatgi, Microstructure and hardness of Al2O3 nanoparticle reinforced Al–Mg composites fabricated by reactive wetting and stir mixing. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 530, 87–97 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.09.042
M. Rahimian, N. Parvin, N. Ehsani, The effect of production parameters on microstructure and wear resistance of powder metallurgy Al–Al2O3 composite. Mater. Des. 32, 1031–1038 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.016
C.S. Ramesh, S. Pramod, R. Keshavamurthy, A study on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al 6061-TiB2 in-situ composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528(12), 4125–4132 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.02.024
K. Sivaprasad, S.K. Babu, S. Natarajan, R. Narayanasamy, B.A. Kumar, G. Dinesh, Study on abrasive and erosive wear behaviour of Al 6063/TiB2 in situ composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 498(1–2), 495–500 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.09.003
P. Senthil Kumar, V. Kavimani, K. Soorya Prakash, V.M. Krishna, Effect of TiB2 on the corrosion resistance behavior of in situ Al composites. Int. Metalcast. 14, 84–91 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-019-00330-3
M. Ramesh, D.D. Jafrey, M. Ravichandran, Investigation on mechanical properties and wear behaviour of titanium diboride reinforced composites. FME Trans. 47(4), 873–879 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5937/fmet1904873R
H.M. Rajan, S. Ramabalan, I. Dinaharan, S.J. Vijay, Synthesis and characterization of in situ formed titanium diboride particulate reinforced Al7075 aluminum alloy cast composites. Mater. Des. 44, 438–445 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.008
Y. Pazhouhanfar, B. Eghbali, Microstructural characterization and mechanical properties of TiB2 reinforced Al6061 matrix composites produced using stir casting process. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 710, 172–180 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.10.087
M.K. Akbari, H.R. Baharvandi, K. Shirvanimoghaddam, Tensile and fracture behavior of nano/micro TiB2 particle reinforced casting A356 aluminum alloy composites. Mater. Des. 1980–2015(66), 150–161 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.048
R.G. Munro, Material properties of titanium diboride. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 105(5), 709–720 (2000). https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.105.057
S. Shahriyari, S. Pashmforoosh, O. Mirzaee, Investigation of the effect of Sr on the mechanical properties and microstructure of nano-alumina reinforced aluminum matrix composites by the vortical casting method. Met. Mater. Int. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-020-00715-8
S. Pashmforoosh, S. Shahriyari, O. Mirzaee, Evaluation of mechanical and microstructure properties of Mg-modified aluminum matrix composite by vortical casting method. Met. Mater. Int. 27, 3026–3038 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-020-00639-3
ASTM E8/E8M-21, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2021).
N. Hansen, Hall-Petch relation and boundary strengthening. Scr. Mater. 51(8), 801–806 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.06.002
Z. Zhang, D.L. Chen, Contribution of Orowan strengthening effect in particulate reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 483, 148–152 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.10.184
ASTM G99-95a(2000)e1, Standard Test Method for Wear Testing with a Pin-on-Disk Apparatus (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2000)
S. Liu, Y. Wang, T. Muthuramalingam, G. Anbuchezhiyan, Effect of B4C and MoS2 reinforcement on micro structure and wear properties of aluminum hybrid composite for automotive applications. Comos. B Eng. 176, 107329 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107329
S. Suresh, N. ShenbagaVinayagaMoorthi, S.C. Vettivel, N. Selvakumar, Mechanical behavior and wear prediction of stir cast Al-TiB2 composites using response surface methodology. Mater. Des. 59, 383–396 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.053
ASTM B. Standard Practice for Operating Salt Spray (fog) Apparatus, 1997 edition (ASTM International, 2011)
B. Zaid, D. Saidi, A. Benzaid, S. Hadji, Effects of pH and chloride concentration on pitting corrosion of AA6061 aluminum alloy. Corros. Sci. 50(7), 1841–1847 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2008.03.006
R.T. Loto, A. Adeleke, Corrosion of aluminum alloy metal matrix composites in neutral chloride solutions. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 16(5), 874–885 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-016-0157-3
S. Gopalakrishnan, N. Murugari, Production and wear characterization of AA 6061 matrix titanium diboride particulate reinforced composite by enhanced stir casting method. Compos. B Eng. 43, 302–308 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.049
A. Aballe, M. Bethencourt, F.J. Botana, M.J. Cano, M. Marcos, Localized alkaline corrosion of alloy AA5083 in neutral 3.5% NaCl solution. Corros. Sci. 43(9), 1657–1674 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-938X(00)00166-9
Acknowledgments
The authors express their sincere thanks and gratitude to Department of Production Technology, MIT campus, Anna University, Chennai, India.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Manoj, M., Jinu, G.R., Kumar, J.S. et al. Effect of TiB2 Particles on the Morphological, Mechanical and Corrosion Behaviour of Al7075 Metal Matrix Composite Produced Using Stir Casting Process. Inter Metalcast 16, 1517–1532 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-021-00696-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-021-00696-3