Abstract
Reducing energy consumption is an important issue for green manufacturing. In this paper, the specific energy consumption (SEC) of the injection molding process is analyzed. Results showed significant variations depending on the injected thermoplastic material and the type of injection molding machine (IMM) suggesting that IMM selection has a high relevance for the efficiency, cost and environmental impact of the process. The manufacturing of 36 plastic parts has been characterized by measuring the electricity consumption and obtaining the environmental impact, being this consumption its most important factor. A descending tendency for both is observed when high throughputs are obtained because the size of the IMM is more optimized. Conversely, the savings obtained by the all-electric IMMs are significant. This research could help engineers to properly select an IMM by taking into account the part weight, material and environmental criteria. Also, this study will be useful for life cycle assessment (LCA) practitioners. Real consumption data is presented, providing details about the materials, and relationships with the IMM that was used. The high variability suggests that if the injection molding process is relevant in a LCA study, its consumption must be analyzed in depth, preferably by measuring real consumptions in the factory.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- ΔT:
-
Difference between room and injection temperature
- η :
-
Percentage of utilization of the IMM's capacity
- Epart :
-
Energy for the production of a plastic part (kWh)
- Eperiod :
-
Average consumed energy in sampling period (kWh)
- Eplast :
-
Required energy to heat the barrel during plasticizing phase (kWh/kg)
- n:
-
Number of cavities of the mold
- ρ :
-
Raw material density (g/cm3)
- SEC:
-
Specific energy consumption
- sh :
-
Specific heat of thermoplastic (kJ/kg K)
- tc :
-
Cycle time (h)
- τ sampling :
-
Sampling period (h)
- Vmax :
-
Maximum injection volume of the IMM (cm3)
- w:
-
Weight injected per cycle (kg)
- y:
-
Throughput (injected kg/h)
References
Dornfeld, D. A., “Moving towards Green and Sustainable Manufacturing,” Int. J. of Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Tech., Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 63–66, 2014.
Martínez, E., Jiménez, E., Blanco, J., and Sanz, F., “LCA Sensitivity Analysis of a Multi-Megawatt Wind Turbine,” Applied Energy, Vol. 87, No. 7, pp. 2293–2303, 2010.
Ricciardi, P., Belloni, E., and Cotana, F., “Innovative Panels with Recycled Materials: Thermal and Acoustic Performance and Life Cycle Assessment,” Applied Energy, Vol. 134, pp. 150–162, 2014.
Nam, S., Lee, D. K., Jeong, Y.-K., Lee, P., and Shin, J.-G., “Environmental Impact Assessment of Composite Small Craft Manufacturing Using the Generic Work Breakdown Structure,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Tech., Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 261–272, 2016.
Elduque, D., Javierre, C., Pina, C., Martínez, E., and Jiménez, E., “Life Cycle Assessment of a Domestic Induction Hob: Electronic Boards,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 76, pp. 74–84, 2014.
Kabakian, V., McManus, M., and Harajli, H., “Attributional Life Cycle Assessment of Mounted 1.8 kWp Monocrystalline Photovoltaic System with Batteries and Comparison with Fossil Energy Production System,” Applied Energy, Vol. 154, pp. 428–437, 2015.
Chiarini, A., “Sustainable Manufacturing-Greening Processes Using Specific Lean Production Tools: An Empirical Observation from European Motorcycle Component Manufacturers,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 85, pp. 226–233, 2014.
Weinert, N., Chiotellis, S., and Seliger, G., “Methodology for Planning and Operating Energy-Efficient Production Systems,” CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 41–44, 2011.
Luo, H., Du, B., Huang, G. Q., Chen, H., and Li, X., “Hybrid Flow Shop Scheduling Considering Machine Electricity Consumption Cost,” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 146, No. 2, pp. 423–439, 2013.
He, Y., Li, Y., Wu, T., and Sutherland, J. W., “An Energy-Responsive Optimization Method for Machine Tool Selection and Operation Sequence in Flexible Machining Job Shops,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 87, pp. 245–254, 2015.
Mativenga, P. and Rajemi, M., “Calculation of Optimum Cutting Parameters Based on Minimum Energy Footprint,” CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 149–152, 2011.
Lee, W., Lee, C.-Y., and Min, B.-K., “Simulation-Based Energy Usage Profiling of Machine Tool at the Component Level,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Tech., Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 183–189, 2014.
Behrendt, T., Zein, A., and Min, S., “Development of an Energy Consumption Monitoring Procedure for Machine Tools,” CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 43–46, 2012.
Avram, O. I. and Xirouchakis, P., “Evaluating the Use Phase Energy Requirements of a Machine Tool System,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 699–711, 2011.
Kara, S. and Li, W., “Unit Process Energy Consumption Models for Material Removal Processes,” CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 37–40, 2011.
Europe, P., “Plastics-The Facts 2014/2015 an Analysis of European Plastics Production, Demand and Waste Data,” Plastic Europe, 2015.
Deng, J., Li, K., Harkin-Jones, E., Price, M., Karnachi, N., et al., “Energy Monitoring and Quality Control of a Single Screw Extruder,” Applied Energy, Vol. 113, pp. 1775–1785, 2014.
Spiering, T., Kohlitz, S., Sundmaeker, H., and Herrmann, C., “Energy Efficiency Benchmarking for Injection Moulding Processes,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 36, pp. 45–59, 2015.
Elduque, A., Javierre, C., Elduque, D., and Fernández, Á., “LCI Databases Sensitivity Analysis of the Environmental Impact of the Injection Molding Process,” Sustainability, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 3792–3800, 2015.
Elduque, A., Elduque, D., Javierre, C., Fernández, Á., and Santolaria, J., “Environmental Impact Analysis of the Injection Molding Process: Analysis of the Processing of High-Density Polyethylene Parts,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 108, pp. 80–89, 2015.
Uluer, M. U., Unver, H. O., Gok, G., Fescioglu-Unver, N., and Kilic, S. E., “A framework for Energy Reduction in Manufacturing Process Chains (E-MPC) and a Case Study from the Turkish Household Appliance Industry,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 112, pp. 3342–3360, 2016.
Thiriez, A. and Gutowski, T., “An Environmental Analysis of Injection Molding,” Proc. of in IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, pp. 195–200, 2006.
Kitayama, S. and Natsume, S., “Multi-Objective Optimization of Volume Shrinkage and Clamping Force for Plastic Injection Molding via Sequential Approximate Optimization,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, Vol. 48, pp. 35–44, 2014.
Wang, Y., Yu, K.-M., and Wang, C. C., “Spiral and Conformal Cooling in Plastic Injection Molding,” Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 63, pp. 1–11, 2015.
Nian, S.-C., Tsai, S.-W., Huang, M.-S., Huang, R.-C., and Chen, C.-H., “Key Parameters and Optimal Design of a Single-Layered Induction Coil for External Rapid Mold Surface Heating,” International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 57, pp. 109–117, 2014.
Wang, G., Zhao, G., and Wang, X., “Development and Evaluation of a New Rapid Mold Heating and Cooling Method for Rapid Heat Cycle Molding,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 78, pp. 99–111, 2014.
Lu, N.-Y., Gong, G.-X., Yang, Y., and Lu, J.-H., “Multi-Objective Process Parameter Optimization for Energy Saving in Injection Molding Process,” Journal of Zhejiang University-Science A, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 382–394, 2012.
Park, H. S. and Nguyen, T. T., “Optimization of Injection Molding Process for Car Fender in Consideration of Energy Efficiency and Product Quality,” Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 256–265, 2014.
Plastics Technology, “Electric, Hydraulic, or Hybrid? What’s the Right Injection Press for You?” https://www.ptonline.com/articles/ electric-hydraulic-or-hybrid-what's-the-rightinjection-press-for-you (Accessed 22 DEC 2017)
Plastics Technology, “Advantages of Servo-Driven Hydraulics For Large Injection Machines,” https://www.ptonline.com/articles/ advantages-of-servo-driven-hydraulics-for-large-injection-machines (Accessed 22 DEC 2017)
Hischier, R., “Part II Plastics. Life Cycle Inventories of Packaging and Graphical Papers. Ecoinvent-Report No. 11,” Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, 2007.
Goedkoop, M., Oele, M., Leijting, J., Ponsioen, T., and Meijer, E., “Introduction to LCA with SimaPro,” PRé, Amersfoort, 2016.
Dong, Y. H. and Ng, S. T., “Comparing the Midpoint and Endpoint Approaches Based on Recipe-A Study of Commercial Buildings in Hong Kong,” International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 1409–1423, 2014.
Tan, Y. S., Tjandra, T. B., and Song, B., “Energy Efficiency Benchmarking Methodology for Mass and High-Mix Low-Volume Productions,” Procedia CIRP, Vol. 29, pp. 120–125, 2015.
Franck, A., “Understanding Rheology of Thermoplastic Polymers,” TA Instruments, 2004.
Klein, R., “Laser Welding of Plastics,” John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
Ribeiro, I., Peças, P., and Henriques, E., “A Life Cycle Framework to Support Materials Selection for Ecodesign: A Case Study on Biodegradable Polymers,” Materials & Design, Vol. 51, pp. 300–308, 2013.
Goodship, V. and Love, J., “Multi-Material Injection Moulding,” iSmithers Rapra Publishing, 2002.
Uluer, O., “The Effect of the Processing Parameters on Frozen Layer Formation in Injection Molding,” Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 249–255, 2008.
U-MHI PLATECH Co., Ltd., http://www.u-mhipt.co.jp/injec_e/ products/em1050-1600/index.htm (Accessed 22 DEC 2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elduque, A., Elduque, D., Clavería, I. et al. Influence of material and injection molding machine’s selection on the electricity consumption and environmental impact of the injection molding process: An experimental approach. Int. J. of Precis. Eng. and Manuf.-Green Tech. 5, 13–28 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-018-0002-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-018-0002-0