Abstract
Phytophagous insects escape from predators by dropping. However, if they drop to the ground, they must then return to the host plants. Large oval leaves may serve as safety nets when insects drop from overlying leaves. To clarify the effects of leaf shape on the sites to which insects drop, we investigated the dropping behaviour of Phaedon brassicae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on three host plants (daikon, bok choy, and Chinese cabbage). Daikon plants have cleft leaves, whereas bok choy and Chinese cabbage plants have oval leaves. When poked with forceps, larvae dropped less frequently than adults. The proportions of individuals dropping to the ground also differed among host plants. Both larvae and adults on the ventral (abaxial) leaf surfaces of daikon frequently dropped to the ground via clefts in the underlying leaves. However, larvae and adults on the ventral leaf surfaces of bok choy and Chinese cabbage frequently dropped to underlying leaves. Most larvae and adults that dropped to the ground finally returned to host plants. However, the return times were longer for larvae than adults. Therefore, the cost of dropping from daikon leaves was higher than were the costs of dropping from leaves of other crop species.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Escape is a defensive behaviour (Edmunds 1974; Ruxton et al. 2004). Some arthropods escape predators by dropping (Castellanos et al. 2011; Day et al. 2006; Losey and Denno 1998a, b; Sato et al. 2005). Dropping allows rapid departure from sites where predators may be encountered (Francke et al. 2008; Sato et al. 2005). However, arthropods dropping to the ground may encounter ground-dwelling predators such as ants (Losey and Denno 1998c; Loughridge and Luff 1983) and may also suffer desiccation; ground temperatures are higher than plant aerial temperatures (Dill et al. 1990; Roitberg et al. 1979). In addition, departure from a feeding site reduces reproductive capacity and feeding efficiency and increases developmental time (Agabiti et al. 2016; Nelson 2007). Even when dropping to the ground is not lethal, the energy used to return to feeding sites and the prolonged growth period can be considered costs of dropping behaviour (Agabiti et al. 2016; Nelson 2007). Therefore, arthropods seek to avoid dropping to the ground (Brackenbury 1996; Sugiura and Yamazaki 2006; Yanoviak et al. 2005, 2009, 2015).
Host plant architecture (e.g., leaf shape) may modulate the ground-dropping frequency of phytophagous insects. Large oval leaves serve as safety nets for insects dropping from overlying leaves; insects on host plants that have oval leaves drop to the ground less frequently than do insects on plants with small or cleft leaves. Therefore, it is likely that the costs of dropping behaviour vary among host plant species. However, this hypothesis has not been tested. Such work would allow us to understand the evolution of escape behaviour in, and host selection by, phytophagous insects.
To explore the influence of host plant architecture on the costs of dropping in phytophagous insects, we investigated the escape and defensive behaviours of the daikon leaf beetle Phaedon brassicae (Baly) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) living on three host plants differing in terms of leaf shape. Phaedon brassicae is a well-recognised pest of cruciferous crops (Funaki 1958; Kimoto and Takizawa 1994; Miura and Shigeta 1967; Okada 2003). The insect feeds on many species and varieties of cruciferous crops that differ in terms of leaf shape (Kimoto and Takizawa 1994). Both larvae and adults of P. brassicae drop from host plants when they are disturbed (Okada 2003). Thus, P. brassicae is a suitable model to clarify the effects of leaf shape on post-dropping behaviour. The ground mortality risk may be higher for larvae than adults because adults are more mobile than larvae. Thus, the effects of host plant architecture on post-dropping behaviour may differ between larvae and adults. To compare the effects of leaf shape on the dropping behaviour costs of larvae and adults, we performed the following field observations and experiments. First, we observed dropping and other defensive behaviours of P. brassicae larvae and adults living on three host plants. Second, we explored whether larvae and adults dropped to the ground or to host plant leaves. If larvae and adults dropped to the ground, we explored whether they returned to the host plants. If return was successful, the time required for return was recorded. In addition, we investigated the abundance and distributions of P. brassicae larvae and adults on three host plants to explore the relationship between dropping behaviour and host plant use. Finally, we discuss the effects of host plant architecture on the costs of dropping behaviour in P. brassicae.
Materials and methods
Study site and species
Field observations and experiments were conducted at a farm located in Sannan-cho, Tamba, Hyogo Prefecture, Japan (35°05′N, 135°05′E; 128 m above sea level; Matsubara and Sugiura 2017). Various crops (cruciferous, leguminous, and solanaceous plants) are cultivated on the farm. Many pests, including P. brassicae and its natural enemies, live on the farm; neither pesticides nor herbicides are used.
We studied larvae and adults of the leaf beetle species P. brassicae to explore defensive behaviours and associated costs; the beetle serves as a model phytophagous insect. Phaedon brassicae growth proceeds through three larval instars before pupation; each instar is identifiable by body colour and the number of body hairs (Funaki 1958). When larvae and adults were disturbed, they folded their legs and antennae (a tonic immobilising behaviour) and consequently dropped to the ground (Fig. 1a), underlying leaves (Fig. 1b), or the same leaves (Fig. 1c). Both larvae and adults were abundant at our field site from October to November. Third-instar larvae and adults were used in the following experiments because first- and second-instar larvae were too small to allow investigations to be made under field conditions. The body length of third instars was 3.4–5.9 mm and that of adults 3.3–4.9 mm. To explore the effects of host plant architecture on the costs of dropping behaviour, we used three host plants (two species but of three varieties: Brassicales: Brassicaceae): daikon (Japanese white radish; Raphanus sativus L. var. longipinnatus); bok choy (Brassica rapa var. chinensis); and Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa var. pekinensis L.). During our experimental period, 66 daikon, 51 bok choy, and 62 Chinese cabbage plants were under cultivation at the study site. Daikon plants have cleft leaves, whereas bok choy and Chinese cabbage plants have oval leaves (Fig. 2). The leaf widths and lengths were respectively 58–84 and 97–297 mm for daikon, 82–138 and 75–187 mm for bok choy, and 122–228 and 53–231 mm for Chinese cabbage. Because of their leaf shapes, bok choy and Chinese cabbage leaves are more likely to overlap than are daikon leaves (Fig. 2). We hypothesised that the difference in leaf shape would predict the ground-dropping frequency of P. brassicae (Fig. 1).
Dropping and other defensive behaviours
To explore the influence of host plant type on the defensive behaviours of P. brassicae larvae and adults, we observed the responses of third-instar larvae and adults to simulated attacks. We poked larval abdomens and adult elytrons with forceps to simulate attacks by predacious insects, such as ants. Twenty larvae and 20 adults randomly selected from leaves of each host plant (i.e., 60 larvae and 60 adults in all) were used for the experiments. In control experiments, we held the forceps 100 mm away from larvae and adults. Similarly, 20 larvae and 20 adults randomly selected from leaves of each host plant were used for the control experiments (i.e., 60 larvae and 60 adults in all).
The leaf positions [dorsal (adaxial) or ventral (abaxial)] of all larvae and adults were recorded. In a preliminary experiment, we found that both larvae and adults exhibited escape or defensive behaviour in response to poking, but not to other stimuli (e.g., air blowing). After poking with forceps, we observed whether larvae or adults exhibited dropping behaviour, and whether they dropped to the ground or to the same or other leaves (Fig. 1). If such behaviour was lacking, any alternative behaviour was observed. Larvae mobilise chemical defences as alternatives to dropping (Kimoto and Takizawa 1994; Sugawara et al. 1979). When the larvae secreted liquids from their bodies, we considered that a chemical defence was in play. We performed our experiments from early October to early November 2016 (09:30–18:00; temperature 17.3–23.2 °C at the Kaibara Meteorological Station, 35°08′N, 135°04′E, 98 m above sea level).
Post-dropping behaviours
To explore the influence of plant architecture on the post-dropping behaviour of P. brassicae, we performed the following experiment. Insects were more likely to drop from outer leaves to the ground, but more likely to drop from inner leaves to other leaves of the same host plant. Therefore, we did not use insects found on either the outermost or innermost leaves. To evoke dropping behaviour, we poked randomly selected larvae and adults on each host plant. When they exhibited dropping behaviour, we determined whether they dropped to the ground or to leaves of the host plant. Individuals that did not exhibit dropping behaviour were removed from the experiments. Therefore, we investigated the sites to which 11 larvae and 11 adults dropped from the dorsal leaf surfaces of each host plant type. Similarly, we investigated the sites to which 11 larvae and 11 adults dropped from the ventral leaf surfaces of each host plant type. When larvae and adults dropped to the ground, we explored whether they returned to host plants, and recorded the return times to the nearest second using a stopwatch. When larvae and adults became inactive in the soil, we considered that they had failed to return to the host plants. Experiments were conducted from early October to early November 2016 (09:30–17:00; temperature 10.6–25.5 °C).
Abundance and distribution on host plants
To explore the host plant use of P. brassicae, we investigated the abundance and distribution. Ten daikon plants, 10 bok choy plants, and 10 Chinese cabbage plants were randomly selected on 24 October 2016. The numbers of third-instar larvae and adults were counted on each plant (08:30–12:30; temperature 15.0–18.1 °C). Their positions (dorsal or ventral leaf side) were also recorded. The plant heights of daikon, bok choy, and Chinese cabbage were 285–439, 199–277, and 172–291 mm, respectively.
Data analyses
Generalised linear mixed models (GLMMs) with binomial error distributions and logit links were used to determine (1) factors affecting defensive behaviours of P. brassicae; (2) factors determining the places to which P. brassicae dropped; and (3) factors affecting the return rates of P. brassicae to host plants. (1) Whether P. brassicae exhibited dropping or other behaviour (1/0) served as the response variable; host plant types (daikon, bok choy, or Chinese cabbage), the developmental stage of P. brassicae (larva or adult), and the position of P. brassicae (the ventral or dorsal leaf side) were fixed factors; and individual host plants were treated as random factors. (2) Whether P. brassicae dropped to the ground or onto leaves of the same host plant (1/0) served as the response variable; host plant types, the developmental stage of P. brassicae, and the position of P. brassicae were fixed factors; and individual host plants were treated as random factors. (3) Whether P. brassicae could successfully return to the host plant or not (1/0) served as the response variable; host plant types and P. brassicae stages as fixed factors; and host plant individuals as random effects. In addition, a GLMM with a Gaussian error distribution and an identity link was used to define factors affecting the time required for insects to return to host plants from the ground. This time was the response variable; the host plant types and P. brassicae stages were fixed factors, and host plant individuals were treated as random effects. To define factors affecting the abundance of P. brassicae larvae or adults, we also ran GLMMs with Poisson error distributions and log links. The numbers of P. brassicae larvae or adults per plant served as the response variables, host plant types were fixed factors, and host plant individuals were treated as random effects. Furthermore, GLMMs with binomial error distributions and logit links were used to clarify the effects of host plant type on the distribution of P. brassicae larvae or adults on leaves on each plant. The presence of P. brassicae on the dorsal or ventral side of leaves (1/0) was the response variable, the host plant types were fixed factors, and host plant individuals were considered random effects.
All analyses were performed using R software version 3.4.1 (R Development Core Team 2015). GLMMs were run using the lme4 package 1.1.13 (Bates et al. 2017) and the lmerTest package 2.2.33 (Kuznetsova et al. 2016).
Results
Dropping behaviour
When poked by forceps, P. brassicae adults dropped more frequently than did larvae (Fig. 3). Almost all adults dropped on all three host plants (Fig. 3). Less than half of all larvae dropped (Fig. 3). Therefore, the rates differed significantly between adults and larvae, but not among host plants (Table S1 in the electronic supplementary material). Two adults that did not drop walked for 5–20 mm and sat still. All larvae that did not drop mounted a chemical defence, secreting liquid from their bodies. No larva or adult responded to control stimuli.
Post-dropping behaviour
Larvae and adults dropped to the ground or to the same host plant (Fig. 1). Both larvae and adults more frequently dropped to the ground from the ventral leaf surfaces of daikon plants than from the ventral leaf surfaces of bok choy and Chinese cabbage plants (Fig. 4a; Table S2 in the electronic supplementary material). Larvae and adults on the ventral leaf surfaces of bok choy and Chinese cabbage plants frequently dropped to underlying leaves of the same host plants (Fig. 4a; Table S2). Therefore, the frequency of dropping to the ground differed significantly among host plants, but not between P. brassicae larvae and adults (Table S2). In addition, an effect of feeding position (i.e., on the ventral or dorsal leaf side) was evident (Fig. 4a, b; Table S2). Therefore, P. brassicae more frequently dropped to the ground from ventral than dorsal leaf surfaces (Table S2).
When larvae and adults dropped to the ground, the sites to which they dropped were 0.1–0.2 m from the bases of the host plants. Dropping larvae and adults folded their legs and antennae (a tonic immobilising behaviour). Larvae and adults revived in 133.3 ± 74.8 s [mean ± standard error (SE), n = 16] and 52.4 ± 33.4 s (n = 17), respectively, after dropping to the ground. In total, 67–80% and 92–100% of larvae and adults successfully returned to host plants (Table 1). Of 16 larvae, one was observed to repel an ant of a Formica species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) by secreting a chemical. The return rate did not differ significantly among P. brassicae stages or host plants (Table S3 in the electronic supplementary material). However, the time required to return to host plants differed significantly between larvae and adults (Fig. 5; Table S4 in the electronic supplementary material). Therefore, the larvae required more time than adults to return.
Abundance and distribution on host plants
The numbers of P. brassicae larvae per plant differed significantly between daikon and bok choy, but not daikon and Chinese cabbage (Table 2; Table S5 in the electronic supplementary material). The numbers of P. brassicae adults per plant differed between daikon and bok choy and daikon and Chinese cabbage (Table 2; Table S6 in the electronic supplementary material). Both larvae and adults were more frequent on ventral than the dorsal leaf surfaces (Table 2); the proportions did not differ significantly among host plants (Tables S7 and S8 in the electronic supplementary material).
Discussion
Some phytophagous insects escape predators by dropping from host plants (Castellanos et al. 2011; Losey and Denno 1998a; Sato et al. 2005), but few studies have focused on the sites to which phytophagous insects drop (Castellanos and Barbosa 2011). We found that the leaf shapes of the host plants affected the sites to which P. brassicae dropped (Fig. 4) and that the host plant effects differed between larvae and adults (Fig. 5). However, the findings reflect limited aspects of P. brassicae dropping behaviour because factors other than leaf shape (e.g., leaf hairs, hardness, and chemicals) may influence the behaviour. Ideally, P. brassicae behaviour should be compared among different leaf shapes (i.e., cleft vs. oval) of the same plant species to investigate the effects of leaf shape. Considering this limitation, we examined the dropping behaviour of P. brassicae in terms of defensive strategies and energy costs.
Defensive strategies
Some insects change defensive strategies during development (e.g., Cornell et al. 1987; Grant 2007; Watanabe and Yano 2010). However, few studies have explored whether the relative significance of dropping and other defensive behaviours changes during the development of phytophagous insects (Lucas et al. 1997). The differences in dropping behaviour between adults and larvae (Fig. 3) indicate that P. brassicae changes its defensive strategy during development from the larval stages to adulthood. The time required to return to the host plants was longer for larvae than adults (Fig. 5; Table 1); thus, the costs associated with dropping to the ground were higher for larvae than adults. Therefore, larvae exhibited dropping behaviour in response to simulated attacks less frequently than did adults (Fig. 3). The relative significance of dropping behaviour was lower for larvae than adults.
Phaedon brassicae larvae mainly mounted a chemical defence to simulated attacks. This can repel predators such as ants (Sugawara et al. 1979). Indeed, one larva that dropped to the ground was observed to repel an ant using chemical defence. However, some larvae exhibited dropping behaviour (Fig. 3), which suggests that such behaviour is more effective against some predators than chemical defence. For example, crab spiders and frogs feed on P. brassicae larvae on crop leaves (Matsubara 2017).
Phaedon brassicae adults mainly exhibited dropping behaviour in response to simulated attacks (Fig. 3). As adults cannot fly, they walk on the ground to move among host plants. Therefore, the costs of dropping behaviour are not considered high for adults. Although adults do not secrete defensive chemicals, the hard exoskeleton (i.e., the elytra) of adults may function as a physical defence against predators. Indeed, we observed that ground-dwelling wolf spiders failed to kill adults (Matsubara and Sugiura personal observations).
Effects of host plant architecture
Previous studies explored the roles played by host plants on insect development, behaviour, and host selection (Awmack and Leather 2002; Müller and Müller 2017), but not the costs of dropping behaviour in phytophagous insects. In this study, we found that the costs of dropping behaviour differed among host plant types in the leaf beetle P. brassicae. The beetles frequently dropped to the same leaves from the dorsal sides of leaves (Fig. 1c), while they were physically unable to drop from the ventral side of leaves to the same leaves. Accordingly, P. brassicae dropped more frequently to the ground from ventral than dorsal leaf surfaces on the three host plant types (Table S2). In addition, we found that P. brassicae more frequently dropped to the ground from the ventral leaf surfaces of daikon than from those of other host plants (Fig. 4), which suggests that the costs of dropping from the ventral sides of daikon leaves were higher than those associated with dropping from bok choy and Chinese cabbage leaves. Therefore, different costs of dropping behaviour from distinct host plants might induce the following responses: P. brassicae changes its behaviour from dropping to other defences when on daikon, and avoids the ventral leaf surfaces of daikon. However, such responses were not observed in this study (Fig. 3, Tables 2 and S5–S8).
Some phytophagous insect species feed on several plant species that differ in terms of architecture (Strong et al. 1984). Predation pressures imposed by natural enemies differ among host plants (Barbosa et al. 2001; Lill et al. 2002; Sugiura 2007), which suggests that both enemies and host plant architecture impose selective evolutionary pressures on defensive behaviour and host plant selection. Further studies are needed to clarify the effects of host plants on the success of various defences mounted by phytophagous insects.
References
Agabiti B, Wassenaar RJ, Winder L (2016) Dropping behaviour of pea aphid nymphs increases their development time and reduces their reproductive capacity as adults. PeerJ 4:e2236
Awmack CS, Leather SR (2002) Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 47:817–844
Barbosa P, Segarra AE, Gross P, Caldas A, Ahlstrom K, Carlson RW, Ferguson DC, Grissell EE, Hodges RW, Marsh PM, Poole RW, Schauff ME, Shaw SR, Whitfield JB, Woodley NE (2001) Differential parasitism of macrolepidopteran herbivores on two deciduous tree species. Ecology 82:698–704
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S, Christensen RHB, Singmann H, Dai B, Grothendieck G, Green P (2017) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Linear Mixed-Effects Models using ‘Eigen’ and S4. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/. Accessed 16 Jun 2017
Brackenbury J (1996) Novel locomotory mechanisms in caterpillars: life-line climbing in Epinotia abbreviana (Tortricidae) and Yponomeuta padella (Yponomeutidae). Physiol Entomol 21:7–14
Castellanos I, Barbosa P (2011) Dropping from host plants in response to predators by a polyphagous caterpillar. J Lepid Soc 65:270–272
Castellanos I, Barbosa P, Zuria I, Tammaru T, Christman MC (2011) Contact with caterpillar hairs triggers predator-specific defensive responses. Behav Ecol 22:1020–1025
Cornell JC, Stamp NE, Bowers MD (1987) Developmental change in aggregation, defense and escape behavior of buckmoth caterpillars, Hemileuca Iucina (Saturniidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:383–388
Day KR, Docherty M, Leather SR, Kidd NAC (2006) The role of generalist insect predators and pathogens in suppressing green spruce aphid populations through direct mortality and mediation of aphid dropping behavior. Biol Control 38:233–246
Dill LM, Fraser AHG, Roitberg BD (1990) The economics of escape behaviour in the pea aphid. Oecologia 83:473–478
Edmunds M (1974) Defence in animals. Longman, Harlow
Francke DL, Harmon JP, Harvey CT, Ives AR (2008) Pea aphid dropping behavior diminishes foraging efficiency of a predatory ladybeetle. Entomol Exp Appl 127:118–124
Funaki S (1958) Determination of the larval instar in Phaedon brassicae Baly. Jpn J appl Entomol Z 2(2):144–146 (in Japanese)
Grant JB (2007) Ontogenetic colour change and the evolution of aposematism: a case study in panic moth caterpillars. J Anim Ecol 76:439–447
Kimoto S, Takizawa H (1994) Leaf beetles (Chrysomelidae) of Japan. Tokaidai University Press, Kanagawa (in Japanese)
Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2016) lmerTest: tests in linear mixed effects models. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/. Accessed 16 Jun 2017
Lill JT, Marquis RJ, Ricklefs RE (2002) Host plants influence parasitism of forest caterpillars. Nature 417:170–173
Losey JE, Denno RF (1998a) Interspecific variation in the escape responses of aphids: effect on risk of predation from foliar-foraging and ground-foraging predators. Oecologia 115:245–252
Losey JE, Denno RF (1998b) The escape response of pea aphids to foliar-foraging predators: factors affecting dropping behaviour. Ecol Entomol 23:53–61
Losey JE, Denno RF (1998c) Positive predator-predator interactions: enhanced predation rates and synergistic suppression of aphid populations. Ecology 79:2143–2152
Loughridge AH, Luff ML (1983) Aphid predation by Harpalus rufipes (Degger) (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in the laboratory and field. J Appl Ecol 20:451–462
Lucas E, Coderre D, Brodeur J (1997) Instar-specific defense of Coleomegilla maculata lengi (Col.: Coccinellidae): influence on attack success of the intraguild predator Chrysoperla rufilabris (Neur.: Chrysopidae). Entomophaga 42:3–12
Matsubara S (2017) Predators of leaf beetles on cruciferous plants in a crop field. Kiberihamushi 39(2):74–75 (in Japanese)
Matsubara S, Sugiura S (2017) Chemical defence of turnip sawfly larvae against Japanese tree frogs. J Asia Pac Entomol 20:225–227
Matsubara S, Sugiura S (2018) Images of daikon leaf beetles and their host plants. Figshare Digit Repos. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6791120.v1
Miura T, Shigeta M (1967) Studies on the insect association of group field in san-in district 2. On the insect assosiation in a Japanese radish field. Bull Shimane Agr Coll 15:52–57
Müller T, Müller C (2017) Host plant effects on the behavioural phenotype of a chrysomelid. Ecol Entomol 42:336–344
Nelson EH (2007) Predator avoidance behavior in the pea aphid: costs, frequency, and population consequences. Oecologia 151:22–32
Okada T (2003) Phaedon brassicae Baly. In: Okada T (ed) Umeya K. Agricultural insect pests in Japan. Zenkoku noson kyoiku kyokai, Tokyo (in Japanese)
R Development Core Team (2015) R, a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 16 Jun 2017
Roitberg BD, Myers JH, Frazer BD (1979) The influence of predators on the movement of apterous pea aphids between plants. J Anim Ecol 48:111–122
Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN, Speed MP (2004) Avoiding attack: the evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals and mimicry. Oxford University Press, New York
Sato S, Yasuda H, Evans EW (2005) Dropping behaviour of larvae of aphidophagous ladybirds and its effects on incidence of intraguild predation: interactions between the intraguild prey, Adalia bipunctata (L.) and Coccinella septempunctata (L.), and the intraguild predator. Harmonia axyridis Pallas. Ecol Entomol 30:220–224
Strong DR, Lawton JH, Southwood SR (1984) Insects on plants. Community patterns and mechanisms. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London
Sugawara F, Matsuda K, Kobayashi A, Yamashita K (1979) Defensive secretion of chrysomelid larvae Gastrophysa atrocyanea Motschulsky and Phaedon brassicae Baly. J Chem Ecol 5:635–641
Sugiura S (2007) Structure of a herbivore-parasitoid community: are parasitoids shared by different herbivore guilds? Basic Appl Ecol 8:544–551
Sugiura S, Yamazaki K (2006) The role of silk threads as lifelines for caterpillars: pattern and significance of lifeline-climbing behaviour. Ecol Entomol 31:52–57
Watanabe H, Yano E (2010) Stage-specific defensive strategies of three mantid species, Tenodera aridifolia, Hierodura patellifera, and Statilia maculata, against a natural enemy, Takydromus tachydromoides. Ann Entomol Soc Am 103:293–299
Yanoviak SP, Dudley R, Kaspari M (2005) Directed aerial descent in canopy ants. Nature 433:624–626
Yanoviak SP, Kaspari M, Dudley R (2009) Gliding hexapods and the origins of insect aerial behaviour. Biol Lett 5:510–512
Yanoviak SP, Munk Y, Dudley R (2015) Arachnid aloft: directed aerial descent in neotropical canopy spiders. J R Soc Interf 12:20150534
Acknowledgements
We thank K. Matsubara and H. Matsubara for allowing us to use the study site.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SM and SS conceived and designed experiments. SM conducted field observations and experiments. SM analyzed the data. SM and SS wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The experiments complied with the current laws of Japan.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matsubara, S., Sugiura, S. Host plant architecture affects the costs of dropping behaviour in Phaedon brassicae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Appl Entomol Zool 53, 501–508 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-018-0582-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-018-0582-8