Abstract
To assess the effects of global change on peatland vegetation and biogeochemistry we used a long term (21 years) in-situ plot scale manipulation experiment comprising nitrogen (N; ambient and 30 kg ha−1 yr−1), temperature (T; ambient and + 3.6 °C during growing season) and sulfur (S; ambient and 20 kg ha−1 yr−1) treatments in an oligotrophic boreal peatland. Vegetation was assessed by plant species cover estimates, while biogeochemical processes were characterized by measuring potential extracellular enzyme activity (EEA) of glucosidase, cellulase, aminopeptidase, phosphatase, and sulfatase in the peat matrix. We hypothesized that the plant communities would change in response to the N and T manipulations, and that belowground EEA would respond distinctively to the applied treatments as well as to changes in plant community. We found vascular plant cover to have strongly increased in the T treatment, whereas the Sphagnum cover collapsed in the high N treatment. Belowground we found enhanced enzymatic C and N acquisition activity in response to the N treatment, but EEA showed no response to the T treatment. No S effects were found, neither aboveground nor belowground. Contrary to our expectations, our data reveal a mismatch between above-ground vegetation patterns and belowground decomposition processes. In particular, the large increase in vascular plant cover in the warming treatment found no reflection in belowground EEA.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Two global change factors with strong potential to alter peatland ecosystems are enhanced nitrogen (N) deposition and climate change (Limpens et al. 2008; Dise and Phoenix 2011). Over the last few decades, anthropogenic reactive nitrogen (Nr) production has been greater than production from all natural terrestrial systems combined (Galloway et al. 2008). The highest N deposition rates are measured in the northern hemisphere (Dentener et al. 2006; Reay et al. 2008; Bobbink et al. 2010), where peatlands form a dominant landscape element in boreal and sub-arctic areas. In these northern latitudes 95% of the global peat reserves are found, storing about 25% of the global soil carbon (C) pool (Gorham 1991; Smith et al. 2004; Loisel et al. 2014). Most peatlands are located at latitudes that have already seen substantial changes in climate (IPCC 2014) and are currently undergoing changes that could have severe implications for atmospheric C feedback processes. Thus, northern peatlands are under pressure from both N deposition and climate change, and may be impacted by either driver individually or in combination.
The reason why peat-forming, Sphagnum-dominated, oligotrophic wetlands are among the most sensitive ecosystems to enhanced N input, is that these strongly nutrient limited ecosystems rely heavily on atmospheric deposition for their N supply (Rydin and Jeglum 2006). Oligotrophic peatlands are usually dominated by Sphagnum moss building the bottom layer and by sparsely interspersed ericaceous shrubs and graminoid sedges (Rydin and Jeglum 2006). Sphagnum species are regarded as “ecosystem engineers” (Vanbreemen 1995), monopolizing sparse nutrients (Malmer et al. 2003; Turetsky 2003) and creating and maintaining an acidic, nutrient poor, wet, and anoxic environment (Rydin and Jeglum 2006) — environmental conditions unfavorable for many vascular plants. Sphagnum litter is by far the most recalcitrant plant component in peatlands (Turetsky 2003; Dorrepaal et al. 2005) and thus slows decomposition processes (Hájek et al. 2011) and fosters C sequestration. As long as N deposition does not exceed the uptake rate by Sphagnum, the genus will maintain its role as ecosystem engineer, and peatland vegetation will remain relatively stable (Lamers et al. 2000; Nordbakken et al. 2003). However, with elevated N deposition, peatland ecosystems typically respond with decreased Sphagnum cover and increased vascular plant abundance (Gunnarsson and Rydin 2000; Wiedermann et al. 2007; Limpens et al. 2011), with cascading effects on the entire peatland ecosystems (Limpens et al. 2008; Eriksson et al. 2010).
Despite the dominant role of Sphagna as ecosystem engineers, vascular plants substantially influence biogeochemistry, ecosystem function and response to global change in peatlands. Peatland plants differ in growth forms, root distribution and architecture, as well as leaf longevity and levels of resistance to decay – so the relative proportion and productivity of each plant functional type (PFT) has consequences for the rates of key ecosystem processes impacting C cycling (Belyea and Malmer 2004). For instance, the evergreen leaves of the ericaceous shrubs are relatively recalcitrant compared to the sedge leaf litter, which degrades easily (Dorrepaal et al. 2005). As a special adaptation to the anoxic conditions in peatlands, sedges have an aerenchymal tissue structure which provides the sedge roots with oxygen and allows for nutrient mining in the deep peat, altering biogeochemical cycles in the deep peat (Ström et al. 2003). Peatland sedge roots are typically non-mycorrhizal (Miller et al. 1999; Thormann et al. 1999). The co-occurring woody ericaceous shrubs lack aerenchymal tissue, resulting in superficial root distribution. Also, the ericaceous shrubs grow with associated mycorrhizal symbionts, which produce the most diverse assemblage of extracellular enzymes of any mycorrhizal fungi, and hence have the potential to assimilate nutrients from complex polymers via high extracellular activity of key enzymes, including proteases, phosphatases, phenol oxidases, chitinases, and cellulases (Cairney and Burke 1998; Martino et al. 2018). In contrast, peatland sedge roots are typically non-mycorrhizal (Miller et al. 1999; Thormann et al. 1999). Both the additional oxygen evading from the aerenchymal sedge roots as well as the diverse extracellular enzyme production by the ericaceous roots in conjunction with the ericaceous mycorrhizae alter biogeochemical processes in peat (Robroek et al. 2015; Ward et al. 2015; Wiedermann et al. 2017). The abundance and composition of vascular plants in peatlands are thus expected to influence belowground biogeochemical processes.
Only by linking aboveground and belowground patterns and processes (Wardle et al. 2004; Van der Putten et al. 2013) it is possible to draw a more comprehensive picture of ecosystem response to altered global change factors. Aboveground effects in peatlands are commonly assessed using vegetation surveys. Belowground activity is more difficult to assess, but measurements of potential extracellular enzyme activity (EEA) can provide information about important belowground processes (Sinsabaugh 1994). Extracellular enzymes are produced by plant roots, mycorrhizae and free living soil microorganisms, and catalyze reactions of N, phosphorus and C depolymerization in soil and peat (e.g., Allison and Vitousek 2005; Wallenstein and Weintraub 2008; Moorhead et al. 2012). Thus, environmental change-induced effects on vegetation communities and associated nutrient and C processing rates are expected to be reflected in changing EEA (Caldwell 2005; Bardgett et al. 2014) and enzyme stoichiometry (Moorhead et al. 2016).
To assess the effects of global change on peatland biogeochemistry and vegetation, a long term (21 years) plot scale manipulation experiment in an oligotrophic boreal peatland was used. The factorial design of the experiment comprises enhanced reactive N, T and S treatments. Early results from the long-term experiment showed an increase in vascular plant cover both in the N and the T treatments along with a sharp decline of the Sphagnum carpet in response to the N treatment, at 8 and 12 years after establishment (Eriksson et al. 2010; Wiedermann et al. 2007). Sulfur effects on the peat vegetation were negligible (Wiedermann et al. 2007). However, long term vegetation responses are not known, nor have belowground processes as described by EEA been assessed in such an experiment.
In the current study, new measurements of vegetation cover from the long-term global change experiment were made to assess whether the vegetation responses after 8–12 years of experimental treatment represented a new stable state, or whether those patterns were transient. Additionally, the EEA were assayed to examine how belowground processes responded to the experimental treatments and concomitant vegetation responses. The specific enzyme assays were primarily chosen to gain insights into the acquisition of the main structural components of peatland biota (C, N, P). Our hypotheses focus on the T and N treatment effects since previous results from this experiment had shown no S effects on the vegetation (Wiedermann et al. 2007).
Central Questions & Hypotheses
Q1: Will projections of vegetation responses to increased T and N fertilization treatments based upon results from short term experiments hold true in the long term? Q2: How do long-term enhanced T and N availability alone and in combination modify (A) the abundance and composition of peatland vegetation, and (B) belowground decomposition processes exemplified by extracellular enzymes responses?
Based on previous results from short term (8–12 years) experiments we expected that vascular plant species cover will increase in response to the T and N fertilization treatment, whereas Sphagnum cover was shown to decline in response to the N treatments (Limpens et al. 2008; Wiedermann et al. 2007). In terms of belowground responses we hypothesized that C (glucosidase (BG) and cellulase (CBH)) and phosphorus mining enzymes (phosphatase (PHOS)) would be up-regulated in response to the N treatment due to an anticipated shift of microbial demands from being N limited to C (Koyama et al. 2013; Cenini et al. 2016) and P limited (Olander and Vitousek 2000; Saiya-Cork et al. 2002). We hypothesized that the N mining enzymes (aminopeptidase (LAP) c.f. (Sinsabaugh 1994) and chitinase (NAG) c.f. (Kang et al. 2005)) would be down-regulated due to an excess of mineral N (Olander and Vitousek 2000; Saiya-Cork et al. 2002). In the T treatment plots we expected that the elevated T would directly increase microbial activity and enzyme process rates (Bell et al. 2013; Steinweg et al. 2013), and additionally that changes in the abundance and composition of vascular plants would strongly modify the responses of extracellular enzymes.
Materials and Methods
Site Description
The study was conducted in a Sphagnum-dominated boreal peatland, Degerö Stormyr, located within the Kulbäcksliden Research Park of the Vindeln Experimental Forests (64°11’ N, 19°33′ E; 270 m a.s.l.), about 70 km from the Gulf of Bothnia in the province of Västerbotten, Sweden. The experimental site is a poor fen (pH 4.5) with a peat depth of about 5 m (Malmström 1923), and is part of a 6.5 km2 mixotrophic peatland system. At the experimental site the bottom vegetation layer is a closed Sphagnum carpet dominated by S. balticum (Russ.). The vascular plant cover is sparse, and dominated by the graminoid Eriophorum vaginatum L. and the two ericoid dwarf-shrubs Andromeda polifolia L. and Vaccinium oxycoccos L.
Experimental Design
The experiment was set up in the central part of the peatland in 1994. Treatments were first applied in 1995. The experiment was set up according to a full factorial design with three experimental factors. The experimental plots used in this study encompassed two levels of temperature (T) (ambient and + 3.6 °C), two levels of nitrogen (N) (ambient (2 kg N ha−1 yr−1), and (30 kg ha−1 yr−1)), and two levels of sulfur (S) (ambient (3 kg S ha−1 yr−1), and (20 kg ha−1 yr−1)) respectively (Granberg et al. 2001). Each experimental combination was duplicated resulting in a total of 16 plots.
Plots measure 2 m × 2 m, and each plot is separated by 1 m buffer zones. To prevent horizontal movement of the added elements, all plots are surrounded by a polyvinyl chloride frame which extends to 0.4 m deep in the peat. Monthly additions of NH4NO3 and Na2SO4 during the growing season have been carried out regularly for 21 years to achieve the respective annual N and S loads. To simulate climate change, warming chambers were used to raise mean air temperature by +3.6 °C, as measured 0.25 m above the bottom layer. These warming chambers consist of 0.5 m high and 2 mm thick transparent polycarbonate side plates. During the snow-free period of the year the plots are covered with a perforated clear plastic film roof at 0.5 m height above the field layer. To allow precipitation to enter the plots and to reduce unintentional effects on humidity, the plastic film is perforated with holes (diameter 20 mm), spaced 100 mm apart. For a more detailed site description and for more information about the field experiment see Granberg et al. (2001).
Sampling of Peat and Plant Material for Chemical Analyses
In early July 2016, 21 years after the onset of the global change experiment, two surface peat cores were taken from each plot. One core was extracted from an Eriophorum dominated tussock area and the other from a mostly Sphagnum dominated inter-tussock. The cores measured 5 cm × 5 cm at the surface and were cut to 10 cm below the WT level using a sharp knife. For each core, the distance from the peat surface to the water table level was recorded individually. Water table levels were in a typical range for the time of year and ranged from 5 cm to 17 cm in the tussock areas and from -2 cm (submerged) to 12 cm in the inter-tussock areas. At the time of sampling the plots did not show any signs of drought. Following extraction from the peat matrix, each core was immediately transferred into individually labeled plastic bags and stored in a cooler in the dark until used for analyses within the next few days.
The depth of the water Table (WT) relative to the peat surface varies between and within plots, with N treatment plots having particularly shallow, and heterogeneous, depth to WT (Eriksson et al. 2010), see Plate 1). We decided to use the average growing season WT (mean growing season water table level is 13.1 cm; Eriksson et al. (2010) as a reference, and utilized the peat material from the cores above this WT level for subsequent analyses. This approach resulted in an average 11 cm tall core for the tussock samples, and an average 5 cm tall core for the inter-tussock samples. The rationale for this sampling approach was to compare peat samples that are similar in age and WT regime. All aboveground green plant material was removed, then each core was homogenized by first cutting the core into ~1 cm depth increments and then mixing these together by hand to create one homogeneous sample of the entire core. Thereafter the homogenized peat cores were subsampled (15–20 pinches per core), and about 6 g of peat was weighed out for the enzyme slurry, and 20 g for dry weight and elemental analyses.
In addition to the peat cores, plant material from the three dominant vascular plants and from S. balticum, the dominant Sphagnum species, was sampled in mid July 2016 from the same experiment. At ten locations within each plot the green parts (including the capitula) of S. balticum were sampled together with ten current annual shoots of V. oxycoccos and A. polifolia, as well as green leaves from ten E. vaginatum individuals. Samples were placed in labeled paper bags separated by species and transported to the lab. The same day all dead and foreign plant material was removed from the samples, which were then dried at 50 °C for 48 h for later chemical characterization.
Vegetation Cover Analyses
In order to be consistent with the annual vegetation recordings throughout the 21-year experimental period, cover estimates by eye in percent cover of the entire plots were recorded for each plant species in October 2016. The autumn colors make it easier to distinguish the vascular and Sphagnum species and thus provide for more accurate cover estimates.
Chemical Analyses
The dried leaf material from the three vascular plants and S. balticum as well as the two dried peat samples (tussock, inter-tussock) from each plot were ground using a ball mill. Thereafter, all samples were analyzed for mass fraction of C and N using an elemental analyzer (Flash EA 2000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany).
Rationale for Selection of Specific Extracellular Enzyme Assays
The measured enzymes in this study except sulfatase (SULF) are assumed to be representative indicators of overall C, N, and P acquisition (Sinsabaugh 1994). Glucosidase (BG) and cellulase (CBH) are the primary enzymes that catalyze cellulose and hemicellulose degradation (Sinsabaugh 1994). Aminopeptidase (LAP) represents a key protease/peptidase enzyme that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from proteins or other peptide substrates (Sinsabaugh 1994), and chitinase (NAG) - frequently used to represent N cleaving enzymes (e.g.: Kang et al. 2005; Bell et al. 2013; Li et al. 2019) - hydrolyzes oligomers of N-acetyl glucosamine in chitin, found in fungal cell walls and invertebrate exoskeletons, and peptidoglycan, the principal component of bacterial cell walls. Phosphatase (PHOS) hydrolyzes phosphomonoesters, liberating phosphate from common organic molecules such as phospholipids and nucleic acids (Sinsabaugh 1994). Sulfatase activity is known to increase in anoxic conditions (Wiedermann et al. 2017), which is a crucial driver of biochemical processes in peatlands (Bergman et al. 1999; Klüpfel et al. 2014).
Assay for Measuring Potential Extracellular Enzyme Activity (EEA) and Enzyme Stoichiometry
To quantify potential extracellular hydrolytic enzyme activity in the peat matrix we closely followed the protocol by Bell et al. (2013) using deep well incubations. To create the peat slurry we used a 0.05 M sodium acetate buffer at pH 4.2 (ambient pH), added 6 g wet peat and used a hand blender for 30 s to create a homogeneous suspension. Separate enzyme assays were run with each of the following six substrates added at a concentration of 200 μM, which is enough to avoid substrate limitation: 4-Methylumbelliferyl β-D-cellobioside (Sigma M6018) for potential cellulase activity (CBH), 4-Methylumbelliferyl β-D-glucopyranoside (Sigma M3633) for potential glucosidase activity (BG), 4-Methylumbelliferyl N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminide (Sigma M2133) for potential chitinase activity (NAG), 4-Methylumbelliferyl phosphate (Sigma M888) for potential phosphatase activity (PHOS) and 4-Methylumbelliferyl-sulfate (Sigma M7133) for potential sulfatase activity (SULF), and L-Leucine-7-amido-4-methylcoumarin hydrochloride (Sigma L2145) for potential aminopeptidase activity (LAP).
We used eight analytical replicates for each enzyme assay and incubated 1000 μl of the peat-substrate slurry in the 2 ml deep well trays at 25 °C in the dark for three hours. The peat slurries were then centrifuged at 41 RCF for 3 min, and 250 μl of the supernatant was transferred into opaque microplates and read for fluorescence with excitation and emission wavelengths of 365 and 460 nm respectively (BioTek Synergy H4 plate reader). To convert the fluorescence readings (output from the software program Gen 5 2.01) into EEA we followed the protocol by Bell et al. (2013), which utilizes a 4-Methylumbelliferone Sigma (M1381) standard curve for each methylumbelliferone sample and a 7-Amino-4-methylcoumarin Sigma (A9891) standard curve for the methylcoumarin substrate (LAP).
Following the acquisition of the EEA, we used stoichiometric equations (c.f., Moorhead et al. 2016) with the measured EEA to assess how changes in N availability and T translate into altered resource limitations.
Statistical Analyses and Data Visualization
Mixed effects models (Bolker et al. 2009) were used on the peat core data to account for the nesting of the two microsites (tussock, inter-tussock = “topography”) within each plot. For data visualization and statistical analysis, R version 3.6.1 for linux-gnu (R-Core Team 2019) and the following packages: “lme4” (Bates et al. 2015), “car” (Fox and Weisberg 2011), “MASS” (Venables and Ripley 2002), and “ggplot2” (Wickham 2009), were used. The applied treatments (N- and S addition and T treatment) were analyzed as fixed factors, while the plot identity was analyzed as a random term.
For data from the peat cores with a normal distribution (tested for with Shapiro test), linear mixed model fits using REML (restricted maximum likelihood – preferred for small sample sizes) were applied. The statistical results were extracted from ANOVA tables using the “car” package in “R”: Analysis of Deviance Table (Type III Wald F tests with Kenward-Roger df). In the case of non-significant interaction terms, the models were reduced to the main factors (N, S, T or topography) only and the statistical results were extracted from ANOVA tables using the “car” package: Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II Wald F tests with Kenward-Roger df). Following Bolker et al. (2009), results were extracted from linear mixed-effects model fits by maximum likelihood using Wald t-tests.
Vegetation cover data, which consisted of a single value per plot rather than having a nested data structure, were analyzed via multiple regression models using the “lm” function in R (p-values are based on Type III t-tests). In case of non-significant interaction terms the models were reduced to the main factors only. Model assumptions were tested with qq-plots to assess model residuals.
Results
Vegetation Response
The most unexpected result was that, unlike after eight years of experimental treatment (Wiedermann et al. 2007), the total vascular plant cover did not show a significant positive response to the applied N treatment after twenty-one years (Table 1). Twenty-one years of experimental warming (T) have though led to a large increase in total vascular plant cover, from an average of 20% in the control plots to an average of 62% in the warmed plots (Fig. 1). Concurrently, vascular plant litter inputs have increased in the warmed plots (Table 1, Fig. 1). No effects on the Sphagnum cover were detected as a function of T (Table 1, Fig. 1), while Sphagnum cover declined drastically in response to the N treatment (Table 1, Fig. 1). The two ericaceous dwarf shrubs responded differently to the applied experimental treatments. V. oxycoccos cover increased in response to the T treatment and declined in response to the TxN treatment (Table 1), whereas A. polifolia did not show any significant responses to the applied N treatments (Table 1). E. vaginatum cover increased in response to the N treatment and the T treatment and declined with the SxN interaction (Table 1). All three vascular plants individually responded with increased cover to the T treatment (Table 1, Fig. 1), while the sulfur (S) treatment alone had no effect on the vegetation cover (Table 1, Fig. 1).
Plant Chemistry
Mass percent N content increased in the annual leaves of E. vaginatum and Sphagnum in the N addition plots (Table 1, and supplemental material). Most drastically, for Sphagnum the tissue N content tripled from an average of 0.53 (± 0.03) mg g−1 DM across the ambient N treatments to an average of 1.54 (± 0.05) mg g−1 DM across the high N treatments (for individual plot data see supplemental material). The T treatment led to lower foliar N concentrations for E. vaginatum and A. polifolia. The T treatment also had a negative effect on the foliar N concentrations of V. oxycoccos, but only in combination with the S treatment (SxT) (Table 1, supplemental material). There were no significant changes in mass percent C content in the leaf tissue for any of the study species.
Microtopography and Peat Chemistry
Mass percent C content of the peat was higher in the tussock area than in the inter-tussock area (Table 2, supplemental material). Regardless of microtopographic position, both mass percent C content and mass percent N content in the peat increased in response to the N treatments (Table 1, supplemental material).
Potential Extracellular Enzyme Activity (EEA)
The T and S treatments had no effect on the EEA of any of the six measured enzymes (Table 2, Fig. 2). Nitrogen addition was the only experimental factor leading to significantly altered extracellular enzyme activity (Table 2, Fig. 2). In response to the N treatments, potential cellulase activity (CBH), potential glucosidase activity (BG), potential chitinase activity (NAG), and potential sulfatase activity (SULF) all increased (Table 2, Fig. 2). We also found different EEA activity depending on the microtopographic position within the plots (Table 2, Fig. 2). Potential chitinase activity (NAG) was significantly higher in elevated tussock areas (Table 2, Fig. 2), whereas potential phosphatase activity (PHOS) was significantly lower in the elevated tussock areas (Table 2, Fig. 2). Overall, potential aminopeptidase activity (LAP) was very low compared to the rest of the measured enzyme assays (Fig. 2). There was significantly lower potential LAP activity in elevated tussock areas (Table 2, Fig. 2). The statistical results of the measured LAP are highly driven by two inter-tussock samples with particularly high activity in response to the high N treatment. The LAP data thus needs to be interpreted with caution.
Enzyme Stoichiometry
The total enzyme N acquisition activity (NAG+LAP) rose in response to the N treatment, and also had significantly higher values in the elevated tussock areas. In contrast, the per unit N acquisition ratio (NAG+LAP normalized to peat N content) declined in response to the N treatment, again differing depending on microtopography with overall higher values in the tussock areas (Table 2, Fig. 3). Both the total enzyme C acquisition activity (CBH + BG) and the per unit C acquisition ratio (CBH + BG normalized to peat C content) increased in response to the N treatment (Table 2, Fig. 3). The enzyme N:P acquisition ratio (NAG+LAP)/PHOS and the enzyme C:P acquisition ratio (CBH + BG)/PHOS both responded positively to N addition in the tussock areas (Table 2, Fig. 3). The enzyme C:N acquisition ratio (CBH + BG)/(NAG+LAP) was unchanged in response to the N treatment but differed between the two microtopographic areas, with higher values in the inter-tussock areas (Table 2, Fig. 3).
Discussion
Short term (8–12 years) experiments in peatlands often show an increase in vascular plant abundance in response to enhanced N conditions (Wiedermann et al. 2007; Kool and Heijmans 2009). However, in this experiment after 21 years of treatment the net effect of N addition on vascular plant cover was relatively minor or neutral. Hence, the observed complete crash of the Sphagnum layer due to N addition left substantial patches of bare peat uncovered by vegetation (see Plate 1). Further, we observed an intriguing mismatch between effects on aboveground vegetation patterns and belowground processes. Whereas the total vascular plant cover and the total vascular plant leaf litter production responded with a pronounced increase in abundance to the T treatment, EEA in the peat matrix responded solely to the N treatments and not to T. The effects of S addition were negligible both aboveground and belowground.
Vegetation Response
Sphagnum
The sharp decline in Sphagnum cover from the N treatment coincided with a substantial increase in N tissue concentration of the Sphagnum species as a function of the added N, which has also been reported by similar studies (Berendse et al. 2001; Wiedermann et al. 2009b) and hints toward a direct negative effect of high N availability on Sphagna (Table 1, Fig. 1, and supplemental material). The unicellular leaf structure of the mosses and the absence of a cuticle permits Sphagna to very effectively intercept and absorb airborne nutrients, in particular N sources, which leads to a competitive advantage of the mosses over vascular plants in oligotrophic conditions (Malmer et al. 2003; Vanbreemen 1995). However, in eutrophic conditions the apparent lack of a mechanism to regulate N uptake, especially under high NH4+ conditions (Wiedermann et al. 2009a; Chiwa et al. 2016) potentially leads to toxic N levels accumulating in the Sphagnum tissue (Van Der Heijden et al. 2000).
Surprisingly, Sphagnum abundance remained unchanged in the T treatments (Table 1, Fig. 1) despite the dense vascular plant cover, on average 62%, which suggests that light levels were not limiting to the Sphagnum species. In support of our results, it has previously been reported by for instance Hayward and Clymo (1983) and Malmer et al. (2003) that Sphagnum can tolerate shading up to a vascular plant cover of about 60%. Another possible indirect negative effect of the T treatment on Sphagnum cover could be through drought effects. In our study negative drought effects can likely be ruled out due to the year-round comparatively high water table at the experimental site (c.f. Peichl et al. 2014; Nijp et al. 2015).
Vascular Plants
For the cover of ericaceous dwarf shrubs, the earlier observed positive responses after 8 years of experimental N addition (Wiedermann et al. 2007) had mostly disappeared after 21 years, which highlights the value of long term experiments. Numerous studies report positive vascular plant species responses to elevated N conditions (e.g., Kool and Heijmans 2009; Limpens et al. 2011). The absence of a positive vascular plant response to the applied N treatment in this study might in part be explained by the collapse of the matrix species (Sphagnum), thereby reducing structural support for some of the species and increasing flooding stress. The collapse of the decaying moss brings the water table closer to the peat surface (Eriksson et al. 2010) thus reduces the aerated rooting space for the ericaceous dwarf shrubs, whereas at the same time providing aerenchymal graminoids with a competitive advantage, which is supported by our data in this study (Table 1, Fig. 1). These hydrological impacts of N addition in peatlands might not only result in a vegetation shift towards eutrophic, aerenchymal graminoids but also shift biogeochemistry toward predominantly anaerobic processes. In this study, we found support for this trend toward a dominance of anaerobic processes from the measured potential sulfatase activity (SULF) where we find highest SULF in response to the N treatment particularly in the inter-tussock areas (Table 2, Fig. 2).
Our findings showed dissimilar responses of the two ericaceous dwarf shrubs (Table 1, Fig. 1), challenging the utility of the concept of trait based plant functional types in this context (Cornelissen et al. 2003; Pérez-Harguindeguy et al. 2013). For practical reasons, ecosystem modelers tend to operate with species groups based on the concept of plant functional types (Lavorel et al. 1997). However, our study demonstrates that caution must be taken when generalizing individual species responses to global change. The central role of Sphagnum spp. (Turetsky 2003; Vanbreemen 1995) might have contributed to the dissimilar response of the two ericaceous species, which present different growth forms. Whereas A. polifolia is an erect woody dwarf shrub, which at the experimental site typically grows up to a height of ~20 cm, V. oxycoccos with its prostrate growth creeps on the Sphagnum surface. We attribute the significant reduction of V. oxycoccos abundance in response to the NT treatment in part to the complete collapse of the Sphagnum matrix, which when intact provides structural support for V. oxycoccos growth. Greater tolerance toward flooding stress shown by Andromeda spp. as compared to Vaccinium spp. was also reported from a mesocosm experiment where water table level manipulations were part of the experimental setup (Potvin et al. 2015). Our findings are in line with previous results (e.g., Reich et al. 2001; Bret-Harte et al. 2008) who also demonstrated that individual species responses to global change can deviate greatly from expected trait based plant functional type responses.
Potential Extracellular Enzyme Activity (EEA)
Despite the many factors that were anticipated to result in altered EEA in response to the T treatment, our results showed no responses of EEA to the T treatment. Instead the only experimental factor that strongly influenced EEA was N addition (Table 2, Fig. 2). Unlike in other ecosystems where enhanced temperature itself coupled with sufficient soil moisture often leads to enhanced extracellular enzyme activity (EEA) (Bell et al. 2013; Steinweg et al. 2013), in oligotrophic peatlands the anticipated positive T effect on EEA seems to be missing. In line with our results a similar lack of T response of EEA was also reported from nutrient poor arctic peatlands (Weedon et al. 2013, 2014). Enzymes are protein structures, thus requiring N for their syntheses. The sparse N resources in oligotrophic peatlands, although creating a high demand for decomposition processes to provide the much-needed nutrient, may also limit extracellular enzyme production. Nitrogen limitation for enzyme production has also been found in arctic tussock soils (Sistla et al. 2012) and has been discussed earlier by Allison and Vitousek (2005).
Contrary to our expectation, elevated N conditions did not induce higher potential phosphatase activity (Table 2, Fig. 2). These results find support in another peatland study by Li et al. (2019), who found a decline in phosphatase activity in response to N addition. Phosphatases are produced by plants and microbes alike and despite higher demand for labile C in response to N addition, no such limitation was seen for P in our study. The lack of apparent P limitation in this minerotrophic portion of the peatland is in line with results from Olid et al. (2017) and from previous results from the experiment in 2003, where no differences in P concentrations of Sphagnum tissue were found in response to the applied treatments (Wiedermann, unpublished data). Alternatively, there might be less of a demand for P and consequently for phosphatases since the ericaceous dwarf shrub density ultimately declined in response to the N treatment, and the rooting depth of the sedges is primarily in the deeper peat zones below our peat core sampling depth.
Enzyme Stoichiometry
The long term experimental N addition might have resulted in a shift in microbial demands from being N limited to increased belowground C limitation as indicated by the applied stoichiometric equations on the measured EEA (Moorhead et al. 2016). In accordance with our expectations, the total enzyme C acquisition activity (glucosidase (BG) + cellulase (CBH)) per unit C (mass percent) increased with N addition, whereas the total enzyme N acquisition activity (chitinase (NAG) + aminopeptidase (LAP)) per unit N (mass percent) decreased with N addition (Table 2, Fig. 3). This suggests that in the N treatments N availability now exceeds demand, thus N may no longer limit decomposition processes, and resources are exceedingly placed toward provision of C, which might promote C loss from peatlands as described by for instance Bragazza et al. (2006).
Discrepancy between the Aboveground and Belowground Responses
The most striking outcome of this long term global change experiment was the apparent discrepancy between the aboveground vegetation response and the belowground decomposition processes, which seem at first glance largely decoupled. We had anticipated that in the T plots the substantial increase in vascular plant species abundance of both the mycorrhizal ericaceous shrubs as well as E. vaginatum, an aerenchymal graminoid, would be reflected in increases in EEA (Bragazza et al. 2013; Wiedermann et al. 2017). In terms of specific effects of the increased vascular plant cover following the T treatment, we expected additional root exudates from the vascular plants to provide for additional labile C (Ström et al. 2003; Crow and Wieder 2005; Drake et al. 2013) which might enhance glucosidase (BG) and cellulase (CBH) activity. With higher ericoid species abundance in the T treatment (thus increased ericoid mycorrhizal abundance), we expected to measure higher potential phosphatase activity (PHOS) due to a strong enzymatic capacity for P mining by the ericoid mycorrhiza (Leake and Miles 1996). In addition, we anticipated the higher mycorrhizal fungal biomass accompanied by higher chitin inputs to lead to elevated chitinase (NAG) activity. Given the increased vascular plant cover in the long term T treatment, we had also anticipated that the higher leaf litter inputs would provide for enhanced resource availability to belowground decomposers and thus overall higher EEA.
The observed responses to the N addition treatment and experimental temperature enhancement differing between aboveground and belowground patterns invites several plausible explanations: 1) The hydrological effects from N addition overrides any positive N effects on the vascular plants. The N treatment led to a collapse of the peat matrix which resulted in relatively higher water table levels that could induce flooding stress on the ericaceous dwarf shrubs. 2) Contrary to the belowground microbial communities, the vascular plants are possibly less N limited. In response to the T treatment, both Eriophorum and Andromeda increased in cover at the expense of tissue N concentration, which dropped. The lower tissue N concentrations in the T treatments indicate that despite the universal low N availability in oligotrophic peatlands and the already high C/N ratios of 47 for Andromeda and 35 for Eriophorum, both species seem to be more temperature limited. 3) N might have negative effects on mycorrhizal colonization as shown for Ecto-mycorrhizal mutualists (Yesmin et al. 1996; Lilleskov et al. 2002, 2011). Negative N effects on belowground processes can result from a complex web of interactions, about which relatively little is known. It is however known that N addition leads to shifts in microbial community composition (e.g., (Wallenstein et al. 2006; Dean et al. 2014) and has particularly negative effects on mycorrhizal fungi (Lilleskov et al. 2011). Mycorrhizal fungi provide many benefits to the host plant, such as enhanced nutrient uptake, additional water supply, and protection from root pathogens (Allen et al. 2003; Albornoz et al. 2016). It is thus possible that altered plant mycorrhizal interactions have led to additional negative effects on the dwarf shrub abundance.
Conclusions
Our long term study in an oligotrophic boreal peatland found an interesting contrast with aboveground vascular plants cover strongly increasing in the T treatments, and belowground enzymatic processes only responding to the N treatment. The large increase in vascular plant cover in the warming treatment finding no reflection in belowground extracellular activity remains a mystery awaiting to be explored in follow-up studies. The initial response of the ericaceous dwarf shrubs to the experimental N addition were found to be positive after 8 years of treatment (Wiedermann et al. 2007), but after 21 years of experimental treatment the initial effect was lost. An important mechanism explaining the lack of positive responses of the ericaceous draft shrubs to the applied N treatment in the long term might be that the high N treatment led to the collapse of the peat matrix, which resulted in relatively higher water table levels that could induce flooding stress on the ericaceous dwarf shrubs. We thus emphasize that such indirect effects of chronic high N levels far exceeding the demands of the Sphagnum species can only be elucidated by long term experiments. Another interesting facet of our study are the negligible effects of S addition on both aboveground vegetation as well as belowground enzymatic processes. Our study, by integrating effects of long term exposure to both elevated N, S and T on peatland vegetation and biogeochemistry, provides critical new insights contributing to a more coherent understanding of peatland ecosystem responses to global change.
References
Albornoz FE, Burgess TI, Lambers H, Etchells H, Laliberté E (2016) Native soilborne pathogens equalize differences in competitive ability between plants of contrasting nutrient-acquisition strategies. Journal of Ecology 105:549–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12638
Allen MF, Swenson W, Querejeta JI, Egerton-Warburton LM, Treseder KK (2003) Ecology of mycorrhizae: a conceptual framework for complex interactions among plants and fungi. Annual Review of Phytopathology 41:271–303. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095518
Allison SD, Vitousek PM (2005) Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 37:937–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.09.014
Bardgett RD, Mommer L, De Vries FT (2014) Going underground: root traits as drivers of ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29:692–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.10.006
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Bell CW, Fricks BE, Rocca JD, Steinweg JM, McMahon SK, Wallenstein MD (2013) High-throughput Fluorometric measurement of potential soil extracellular enzyme activities. Jove-Journal Vis Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/50961
Belyea LR, Malmer N (2004) Carbon sequestration in peatland: patterns and mechanisms of response to climate change. Global Change Biology 10:1043–1052. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00783.x
Berendse F, van Breemen N, Rydin HA, Buttler A, Heijmans M, Hoosbeek MR, Lee JA, Mitchell E, Saarinen T, Vasander H, Wallen B (2001) Raised atmospheric CO2 levels and increased N deposition cause shifts in plants species composition and production in Sphagnum bogs. Global Change Biology 7:571–598. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00433.x
Bergman I, Lundberg P, Nilsson M (1999) Microbial carbon mineralisation in an acid surface peat: effects of environmental factors in laboratory incubations. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 31:1867–1877. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00117-0
Bobbink R, Hicks K, Galloway J, Spranger T, Alkemade R, Ashmore M, Bustamante M, Cinderby S, Davidson E, Dentener F, Emmett B, Erisman JW, Fenn M, Gilliam F, Nordin A, Pardo L, de Vries W (2010) Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: a synthesis. Ecological Applications 20:30–59. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1140.1
Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White JSS (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24:127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008
Bragazza L, Freeman C, Jones T, Rydin H, Limpens J, Fenner N, Ellis T, Gerdol R, Hajek M, Hajek T, Iacumin P, Kutnar L, Tahvanainen T, Toberman H (2006) Atmospheric nitrogen deposition promotes carbon loss from peat bogs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103:19386–19389. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606629104
Bragazza L, Parisod J, Buttler A, Bardgett RD (2013) Biogeochemical plant-soil microbe feedback in response to climate warming in peatlands. Nature Climate Change 3:273–277. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1781
Bret-Harte MS, Mack MC, Goldsmith GR, Sloan DB, DeMarco J, Shaver GR, Ray PM, Biesinger Z, Chapin FS III (2008) Plant functional types do not predict biomass responses to removal and fertilization in Alaskan tussock tundra. Journal of Ecology 96:713–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01378.x
Cairney JWG, Burke RM (1998) Extracellular enzyme activities of the ericoid mycorrhizal endophyte Hymenoscyphus ericae (Read) Korf & Kernan: their likely roles in decomposition of dead plant tissue in soil. Plant and Soil 205:181–192. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004376731209
Caldwell BA (2005) Enzyme activities as a component of soil biodiversity: a review. Pedobiologia (Jena) 49:637–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2005.06.003
Cenini VL, Fornara DA, McMullan G, Ternan N, Carolan R, Crawley MJ, Clément JC, Lavorel S (2016) Linkages between extracellular enzyme activities and the carbon and nitrogen content of grassland soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 96:198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.02.015
Chiwa M, Sheppard LJ, Leith ID, Leeson SR, Tang YS, Cape JN (2016) Sphagnum can ‘filter’ N deposition, but effects on the plant and pore water depend on the N form. Science of The Total Environment 559:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.130
Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Díaz S, Buchmann N, Gurvich DE, Reich PB, Steege H, Morgan HD, Heijden MGA, Pausas JG, Poorter H (2003) A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany 51:335–380. https://doi.org/10.1071/bt02124
Crow SE, Wieder RK (2005) Sources of CO2 emission from a northern peatland: root respiration, exudation, and decomposition. Ecology 86:1825–1834. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1575
Dean SL, Farrer EC, Taylor DL, Porras-Alfaro A, Suding KN, Sinsabaugh RL (2014) Nitrogen deposition alters plant-fungal relationships: linking belowground dynamics to aboveground vegetation change. Molecular Ecology 23:1364–1378. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12541
Dentener F, Drevet J, Lamarque JF et al (2006) Nitrogen and sulfur deposition on regional and global scales: a multimodel evaluation. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002672
Dise NB, Phoenix GK (2011) Peatlands in a changing world: commentary. The New Phytologist 191:309–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03801.x
Dorrepaal E, Cornelissen JHC, Aerts R et al (2005) Are growth forms consistent predictors of leaf litter quality and decomposability across peatlands along a latitudinal gradient? Journal of Ecology 93:817–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01024.x
Drake JE, Darby BA, Giasson MA, Kramer MA, Phillips RP, Finzi AC (2013) Stoichiometry constrains microbial response to root exudation-insights from a model and a field experiment in a temperate forest. Biogeosciences 10:821–838. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-821-2013
Eriksson T, Öquist MG, Nilsson MB (2010) Effects of decadal deposition of nitrogen and sulfur, and increased temperature, on methane emissions from a boreal peatland. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JG001285
Fox S, Weisberg J (2011) An {R} companion to applied regression, second Edi. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Galloway JN, Townsend AR, Erisman JW et al (2008) Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science 320(80):889–892. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136674
Gorham E (1991) Northern peatlands – role in the carbon-cycle and probable responses to climatic warming. Ecological Applications 1:182–195. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941811
Granberg G, Sundh I, Svensson BH, Nilsson M (2001) Effects of temperature, and nitrogen and sulfur deposition, on methane emission from a boreal mire. Ecology 82:1982–1998
Gunnarsson U, Rydin H (2000) Nitrogen fertilization reduces Sphagnum production in bog communities. The New Phytologist 147:527–537. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00717.x
Hájek T, Ballance S, Limpens J, Zijlstra M, Verhoeven JTA (2011) Cell-wall polysaccharides play an important role in decay resistance of Sphagnum and actively depressed decomposition in vitro. Biogeochemistry 103:45–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-010-9444-3
Hayward PM, Clymo RS (1983) The growth of sphagnum: experiments on, and simulation of, some effects of light flux and water-table depth. Journal of Ecology 71:845–863. https://doi.org/10.2307/2259597, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2259597
IPCC (2014) Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change (2014) Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, p 1–32
Kang H, Freeman C, Park SS, Chun J (2005) N -Acetylglucosaminidase activities in wetlands: a global survey. Hydrobiologia 532:103–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-004-9450-3
Klüpfel L, Piepenbrock A, Kappler A, Sander M (2014) Humic substances as fully regenerable electron acceptors in recurrently anoxic environments. Nature Geoscience 7:195–200. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2084
Kool A, Heijmans MMPD (2009) Dwarf shrubs are stronger competitors than graminoid species at high nutrient supply in peat bogs. Plant Ecology 204:125–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-009-9574-7
Koyama A, Wallenstein MD, Simpson RT, Moore JC (2013) Carbon-degrading enzyme activities stimulated by increased nutrient availability in Arctic tundra soils. PLoS One 8:e77212. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077212
Lamers LPM, Bobbink R, Roelofs JGM (2000) Natural nitrogen filter fails in polluted raised bogs. Global Change Biology 6:583–586. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00342.x
Lavorel S, McIntyre S, Landsberg J, Forbes TDA (1997) Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 12:474–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01219-6
Leake JR, Miles W (1996) Phosphodiesterase as mycorrhizal P sources: I. Phosphodiesterase production and the utilization of DNA as a phosphorus source by the ericoid mycorrhizal fungus Hymenoscyphus ericae. The New Phytologist 132:435–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01863.x
Li T, Bu Z, Liu W, Zhang M, Peng C, Zhu Q, Shi S, Wang M (2019) Weakening of the ‘ enzymatic latch ’ mechanism following long-term fertilization in a minerotrophic peatland. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 136:107528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107528
Lilleskov EA, Fahey TJ, Horton TR, Lovett GM (2002) Belowground ectomycorrhizal fungal community change over a nitrogen deposition gradient in Alaska. Ecology 83:104–115. https://doi.org/10.2307/2680124
Lilleskov EA, Hobbie EA, Horton TR (2011) Conservation of ectomycorrhizal fungi: exploring the linkages between functional and taxonomic responses to anthropogenic N deposition. Fungal Ecology 4:174–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2010.09.008
Limpens J, Berendse F, Blodau C, Canadell JG, Freeman C, Holden J, Roulet N, Rydin H, Schaepman-Strub G (2008) Peatlands and the carbon cycle: from local processes to global implications - a synthesis. Biogeosciences 5:1475–1491. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-1475-2008
Limpens J, Granath G, Gunnarsson U, Aerts R, Bayley S, Bragazza L, Bubier J, Buttler A, van den Berg LJL, Francez AJ, Gerdol R, Grosvernier P, Heijmans MMPD, Hoosbeek MR, Hotes S, Ilomets M, Leith I, Mitchell EAD, Moore T, Nilsson MB, Nordbakken JF, Rochefort L, Rydin H, Sheppard LJ, Thormann M, Wiedermann MM, Williams BL, Xu B (2011) Climatic modifiers of the response to nitrogen deposition in peat-forming Sphagnum mosses: a meta-analysis. The New Phytologist 191:496–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03680.x
Loisel J, Yu Z, Beilman DW, Camill P, Alm J, Amesbury MJ, Anderson D, Andersson S, Bochicchio C, Barber K, Belyea LR, Bunbury J, Chambers FM, Charman DJ, de Vleeschouwer F, Fiałkiewicz-Kozieł B, Finkelstein SA, Gałka M, Garneau M, Hammarlund D, Hinchcliffe W, Holmquist J, Hughes P, Jones MC, Klein ES, Kokfelt U, Korhola A, Kuhry P, Lamarre A, Lamentowicz M, Large D, Lavoie M, MacDonald G, Magnan G, Mäkilä M, Mallon G, Mathijssen P, Mauquoy D, McCarroll J, Moore TR, Nichols J, O’Reilly B, Oksanen P, Packalen M, Peteet D, Richard PJH, Robinson S, Ronkainen T, Rundgren M, Sannel ABK, Tarnocai C, Thom T, Tuittila ES, Turetsky M, Väliranta M, van der Linden M, van Geel B, van Bellen S, Vitt D, Zhao Y, Zhou W (2014) A database and synthesis of northern peatland soil properties and Holocene carbon and nitrogen accumulation. The Holocene 24:1028–1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683614538073
Malmer N, Albinsson C, Svensson BM, Wallen B (2003) Interferences between Sphagnum and vascular plants: effects on plant community structure and peat formation. Oikos 100:469–482. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12170.x
Malmström C (1923) Degerö Stormyr: En botanisk hydrologisk och utvecklingshistorisk undersökning av ett nordsvenskt myrkomplex. Medd från Statens Skogsförsöksanstalt 20
Martino E, Morin E, Kuo A et al (2018) Comparative genomics and transcriptomics depict ericoid mycorrhizal fungi as versatile saprotrophs and plant mutualists. The New Phytologist 217:1213–1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14974
Miller RM, Smith CI, Jastrow JD, Bever JD (1999) Mycorrhizal status of the genus Carex (Cyperaceae). American Journal of Botany 86:547–553. https://doi.org/10.2307/2656816
Moorhead DL, Lashermes GG, Sinsabaugh RL (2012) A theoretical model of C- and N-acquiring exoenzyme activities, which balances microbial demands during decomposition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 53:133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.05.011
Moorhead DL, Sinsabaugh RL, Hill BH, Weintraub MN (2016) Vector analysis of ecoenzyme activities reveal constraints on coupled C, N and P dynamics. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 93:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.10.019
Nijp JJ, Limpens J, Metselaar K, Peichl M, Nilsson MB, van der Zee Sjoerd E. A. T. M., Berendse F (2015) Rain events decrease boreal peatland net CO2 uptake through reduced light availability. Global Change Biology 21:2309–2320. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12864
Nordbakken JF, Ohlson M, Högberg P (2003) Boreal bog plants: nitrogen sources and uptake of recently deposited nitrogen. Environmental Pollution 126:191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(03)00194-5
Olander LP, Vitousek PM (2000) Regulation of soil phosphatase and chitinase activity by N and P availability. Biogeochemistry 49:175–190. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006316117817
Olid C, Bindler R, Nilsson MB, Eriksson T, Klaminder J (2017) Effects of warming and increased nitrogen and sulfur deposition on boreal mire geochemistry. Applied Geochemistry 78:149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2016.12.015
Peichl M, Öquist M, Ottosson Löfvenius M, Ilstedt U, Sagerfors J, Grelle A, Lindroth A, Nilsson MB (2014) A 12-year record reveals pre-growing season temperature and water table level threshold effects on the net carbon dioxide exchange in a boreal fen. Environmental Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/5/055006
Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Garnier E, Lavorel S, Poorter H, Jaureguiberry P, Bret-Harte MS, Cornwell WK, Craine JM, Gurvich DE, Urcelay C, Veneklaas EJ, Reich PB, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Ray P, Enrico L, Pausas JG, de Vos AC, Buchmann N, Funes G, Quétier F, Hodgson JG, Thompson K, Morgan HD, ter Steege H, Sack L, Blonder B, Poschlod P, Vaieretti MV, Conti G, Staver AC, Aquino S, Cornelissen JHC (2013) New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany 61:167–234. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT12225
Potvin LR, Kane ES, Chimner RA, Kolka RK, Lilleskov EA (2015) Effects of water table position and plant functional group on plant community, aboveground production, and peat properties in a peatland mesocosm experiment (PEATcosm). Plant and Soil 387:277–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2301-8
R Core Team (2019) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria. https://www.Rproject.org/
Reay DS, Dentener F, Smith P, Grace J, Feely RA (2008) Global nitrogen deposition and carbon sinks. Nature Geoscience 1:430–437. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo230
Reich PB, Tilman D, Craine J, Ellsworth D, Tjoelker MG, Knops J, Wedin D, Naeem S, Bahauddin D, Goth J, Bengtson W, Lee TD (2001) Do species and functional groups differ in acquisition and use of C, N and water under varying atmospheric CO2 and N availability regimes? A field test with 16 grassland species. The New Phytologist 150:435–448. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00114.x
Robroek BJM, Jassey VEJ, Kox MAR, Berendsen RL, Mills RTE, Cécillon L, Puissant J, Meima-Franke M, Bakker PAHM, Bodelier PLE (2015) Peatland vascular plant functional types affect methane dynamics by altering microbial community structure. Journal of Ecology 103:925–934. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12413
Rydin H, Jeglum JK (2006) The biology of Peatlands. Oxford University Press
Saiya-Cork KR, Sinsabaugh RL, Zak DR (2002) The effects of long term nitrogen deposition on extracellular enzyme activity in an Acer saccharum forest soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 34:1309–1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00074-3
Sinsabaugh RL (1994) Enzymic analysis of microbial pattern and process. Biology and Fertility of Soils 17:69–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00418675
Sistla SA, Asao S, Schimel JP (2012) Detecting microbial N-limitation in tussock tundra soil: implications for Arctic soil organic carbon cycling. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 55:78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.06.010
Smith LC, MacDonald GM, Velichko AA et al (2004) Siberian peatlands a net carbon sink and global methane source since the early Holocene. Science (80- ) 303:353–356. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1090553
Steinweg JM, Dukes JS, Paul EA, Wallenstein MD (2013) Microbial responses to multi-factor climate change: effects on soil enzymes. Frontiers in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00146
Ström L, Ekberg A, Mastepanov M et al (2003) The effect of vascular plants on carbon turnover and methane emissions from a tundra wetland methane emissions from a tundra wetland. Global Change Biology 9:1185–1192. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00655.x
Thormann MN, Currah RS, Bayley SE (1999) The mycorrhizal status of the dominant vegetation along a peatland gradient in southern boreal Alberta, Canada. Wetlands 19:438–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161775
Turetsky MR (2003)The role of bryophytes in carbon and nitrogen cycling. The Bryologist 106:395–409. https://doi.org/10.2307/3244721
Van Der Heijden E, Verbeek SK, Kuiper PJC (2000) Elevated atmospheric CO2 and increased nitrogen deposition: effects on C and N metabolism and growth of the peat moss Sphagnum recurvum P. Beauv. var. mucronatum (Russ.) Warnst. Global Change Biology 6:201–212. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00303.x
Van der Putten WH, Bardgett RD, Bever JD et al (2013) Plant-soil feedbacks: the past, the present and future challenges. Journal of Ecology 101:265–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12054
Vanbreemen N (1995) How Sphagnum bogs down other plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10:270–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(95)90007-1
Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Stat. Comput, In http://springerlink.bibliotecabuap.elogim.com/10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2
Wallenstein MD, Weintraub MN (2008) Emerging tools for measuring and modeling the in situ activity of soil extracellular enzymes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 40:2098–2106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.01.024
Wallenstein MD, McNulty S, Fernandez IJ, Boggs J, Schlesinger WH (2006) Nitrogen fertilization decreases forest soil fungal and bacterial biomass in three long-term experiments. Forest Ecology and Management 222:459–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.11.002
Ward SE, Orwin KH, Ostle NJ, Briones MJI, Thomson BC, Griffiths RI, Oakley S, Quirk H, Bardgett RD (2015) Vegetation exerts a greater control on litter decomposition than climate warming in peatlands. Ecology 96:113–123. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-0292.1
Wardle DA, Bardgett RD, Klironomos JN, et al (2004) Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science (80- ) 304:1629–1633. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1094875
Weedon JT, Aerts R, Kowalchuk GA, van Logtestijn R, Andringa D, van Bodegom PM (2013) Temperature sensitivity of peatland C and N cycling: does substrate supply play a role? Soil Biology and Biochemistry 61:109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.02.019
Weedon JT, Aerts R, Kowalchuk GA, van Bodegom PM (2014) No effects of experimental warming but contrasting seasonal patterns for soil peptidase and glycosidase enzymes in a sub-arctic peat bog. Biogeochemistry 117:55–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-013-9870-0
Wickham H (2009) ggplot2. Springer New York, New York, NY
Wiedermann MM, Nordin A, Gunnarsson U, Nilsson MB, Ericson L (2007) Global change shifts vegetation and plant-parasite interactions in a boreal mire. Ecology 88:454–464. https://doi.org/10.1890/05-1823
Wiedermann MM, Gunnarsson U, Ericson L, Nordin A (2009a) Ecophysiological adjustment of two Sphagnum species in response to anthropogenic nitrogen deposition. The New Phytologist 181:208–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02628.x
Wiedermann MM, Gunnarsson U, Nilsson MB, Nordin A, Ericson L (2009b) Can small-scale experiments predict ecosystem responses? An example from peatlands. Oikos 118:449–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17129.x
Wiedermann MM, Kane ES, Potvin LR, Lilleskov EA (2017) Interactive plant functional group and water table effects on decomposition and extracellular enzyme activity in Sphagnum peatlands. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 108:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.01.008
Yesmin L, Gammack SM, Cresser MS (1996) Effects of atmospheric nitrogen deposition on ericoid mycorrhizal infection of Calluna vulgaris growing in peat soils. Applied Soil Ecology 4:49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0929-1393(96)00099-6
Acknowledgements
First of all, we want to thank Caroline Zetterström and the chemistry department at Umeå University for generously providing access to the BioTek Synergy H4 plate reader. We thank the researchers at UPSC especially Sandra Jämtgård and Torgny Näsholm for lab access and space. Lars Ericson is gratefully acknowledged for sharing the 2016 vegetation cover data from his long term vegetation data set. Ishi Buffam helped with the peat coring and contributed to the enzyme analysis with excellent pipetting skills, and gave helpful comments on the manuscript. We also want to thank Erik Lilleskov for helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. Last but not least we want to thank the external reviewers for their time and critical thought, which greatly improved the manuscript. Financial support to MMW was generously provided by the Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Cincinnati, OH. Financial support to MN was provided by the Swedish Integrated Carbon Observation System (ICOS-Sweden) Research Infrastructure and the Swedish Infrastructure for Ecosystem Science (SITES), both funded by the Swedish Research Council and contributing research institutes, which are gratefully acknowledged. This study was also financed by the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (grant no. 2007-666) and the Swedish Research Council (contract no. 2012-2855).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MMW and MBN conceived the study; MBN provided the long-term field experiment; MMW carried out the field sampling, laboratory and statistical analyses and wrote the manuscript; MBN contributed critically to the evaluation and interpretation of the data and to the manuscript writing.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 50 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wiedermann, M.M., Nilsson, M.B. Peatland Vegetation Patterns in a Long Term Global Change Experiment Find no Reflection in Belowground Extracellular Enzyme Activities. Wetlands 40, 2321–2335 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-020-01377-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-020-01377-3