Abstract
By solving driver’s optimal handling input, this paper presents a novel Lane Changing Assistance System (LCAS) which can provide guidance for driver’s lane changing behavior. In addition, vehicle handling inverse dynamics method is proposed to solve driver’s optimal handling input. Firstly, to recognize driver’s lane changing intention and decrease the false alarm rate of LCAS, a lane changing intention recognition model is established. Secondly, the handling inverse dynamics model is established; and then the inverse dynamics problem is converted into the optimal control problem. Finally, the optimal control problem is converted into a nonlinear programming problem based on GPM; then sequential quadratic programming (SQP) is applied to get the solution. The direct collocation method (DCM) is used as the contrast verification of GPM. The simulation results show that the driver’s optimal handling input can be obtained according to driver’s lane changing intention in the proposed LCAS; and GPM has higher computational accuracy compared with DCM. This method may provide a reference for the research of LCAS and unmanned vehicles.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- c :
-
penalty coefficient
- g :
-
kernel function parameter
- ωr :
-
yaw rate, deg−1
- v :
-
lateral velocity, m·s−1
- u :
-
longitudinal velocity, m·s−1
- m :
-
vehicle total mass, kg
- F yf :
-
cornering force of the front wheel, N
- δ:
-
steering angle of the front wheel, deg
- δsw :
-
steering wheel angle, deg
- δr :
-
steering wheel angle rate, deg−1
- F yr :
-
cornering force of the rear wheel, N
- I z :
-
rotational inertia around vertical axis, kg·m2
- F xr :
-
braking force, N
- F xf :
-
driving / braking force of the front wheel, N
- θ:
-
course angle, deg
- a :
-
distance from mass center to front axle, m
- b :
-
distance from mass center to rear axle, m
- F f :
-
rolling resistance, N
- F w :
-
air resistance, N
- C D :
-
air resistance coefficient
- A:
-
frontal area, m2
- φ:
-
road adhesion coefficient
- F zf :
-
vertical force of the front wheel, N
- F zr :
-
vertical force of the rear wheel, N
- g 0 :
-
gravity acceleration, m·s−2
- k 1 :
-
synthesized stiffness of front wheel, N·rad−1
- k 2 :
-
synthesized stiffness of rear wheel, N·rad−1
- h g :
-
centroid height, m
- i :
-
steering gear ratio
- t 0 :
-
initial time, s
- t e :
-
terminal time, s
- a y :
-
lateral acceleration, m·s−2
References
Andreasson, J. and Bunte, T. (2006). Global chassis control based on inverse vehicle dynamics models. Vehicle System Dynamics: Int. J. Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility 44, Supplement 1, 321–328.
Bernard, J. and Pickelmann, M. (1986). An inverse linear model of a vehicle. Vehicle System Dynamics: Int. J. Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility 15, 4, 179–186.
Berndt, H. and Dietmayer, K. (2009). Driver intention inference with vehicle onboard sensors. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES), Pune, India.
Boyer, F. and Ali, S. (2011). Recursive inverse dynamics of mobile multibody systems with joints and wheels. IEEE Trans. Robotics 27, 2, 215–228.
Casanova, D., Sharp, R. S. and Symonds, P. (2000). Minimum time maneuvering: the significance of yaw inertia. Vehicle System Dynamics: Int. J. Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility 34, 2, 77–115.
Chovan, J. D., Tijerina, L., Alexander, G. and Hendricks, D. L. (1994). Examination of Lane Change Crashes and Potential IVHS Countermeasures. NHTSA Technical Report. DOT -VNTSC-NHTSA-93-2.
Cole, D. J. (2012). A path-following driver-vehicle model with neuromuscular dynamics, including measured and simulated responses to a step in steering angle overlay. Vehicle System Dynamics: Int. J. Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility 50, 4, 573–596.
Dang, R. N., Zhang, F., Wang, J. Q., Yi, S. C. and Li, K. Q. (2013). Analysis of Chinese driver’s lane change characteristic based on real vehicle tests in highway. Proc. 16th Int. IEEE Conf. Intelligent Transportation Systems, Hague, Netherlands.
Doga, U., Edelbrunner, J. and Iossifidis, I. (2011). Autonomous driving: A comparison of machine learning techniques by means of the prediction of lane change behavior. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Biomimetics, Karon Beach, Phuket, Thailand.
Eidehall, A., Pohl, J. and Gustafsson, F. (2005). A new approach to lane guidance systems. Proc. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vienna, Austria.
Fujioka, T. and Kimura, T. (1992). Numerical simulation of minimum-time cornering behavior. JSAE Review 13, 1, 44–51.
Gadepally, V., Krishnamurthy, A. and Ozguner, U. (2014). A framework for estimating driver decisions near intersections. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 15, 2, 637–646.
Garg, D., Hager, W. W. and Rao, A. V. (2011). Pseudospectral methods for solving infinite-horizon optimal control problems. Automatica 47, 4, 829–837.
Gipps, P. G. (1986). A model for the structure of lanechanging decisions. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 20, 5, 403–414.
Guo, J. H., Hu, P. and Wang, R. B. (2016). Nonlinear coordinated steering and braking control of vision-based autonomous vehicles in emergency obstacle avoidance. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 17, 11, 3230–3240.
Guo, J. H., Hu, P., Li, L. H. and Wang, R. B. (2012). Design of automatic steering controller for trajectory tracking of unmanned vehicles using genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technology 61, 7, 2913–2924.
Guo, J. H., Luo, Y. G. and Li, K. Q. (2018a). Adaptive coordinated collision avoidance control of autonomous ground vehicles. Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: J. Systems and Control Engineering, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959651818774991.
Guo, J. H., Luo, Y. G. and Li, K. Q. (2018b). Adaptive nonlinear trajectory tracking control for lane change of autonomous four wheel independently drive electric vehicles. IET Intelligent Transport Systems 12, 7, 712–720.
Guo, J. H., Luo, Y. G., Li, K. Q. and Dai, Y. F. (2018c). Coordinated path-following and direct yaw-moment control of autonomous electric vehicles with sideslip angle estimation. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 105, 183–199.
Guo, K. H. (1984). Drivers-vehicle close-loop simulation of handling by “preselect optimal curvature method”. Automotive Engineering, 3, 1–17.
Hendrikx, J. P. M., Meijlink, T. J. J. and Kriens, R. F. C. (1996). Application of optimal control theory to inverse simulation of car handling. Vehicle System Dynamics: Int. J. Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility 26, 6, 449–461.
Hidas, P. (2002). Modeling lane changing and merging in microscopic traffic simulation. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 10, 5–6, 351–371.
Hou, Y., Edara, P. and Sun, C. (2014). Modeling mandatory lane changing using Bayes classifier and decision trees. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 15, 2, 647–655.
Jin, Z. L., Weng, J. S. and Hu, H. Y. (2007). Rollover stability of a vehicle during critical driving maneuvers. Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering 221, 9, 1041–1049.
Jula, H., Kosmatopoulos, E. B. and Ioannou, P. (2000). Collision avoidance analysis for lane changing and merging. IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technology 49, 6, 2295–2308.
Lee, S. E., Olsen, E. C. B. and Wierwille, W. W. (2004). A Comprehensive Examination of Naturalistic Lanechanges. NHTSA Technical Report. DOT-HS-809-702.
Li, K. Q., Wang, X., Xu, Y. C. and Wang, J. Q. (2016). Lane changing intention recognition based on speech recognition models. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 69, 497–514.
Liu, Y. J. and Jiang, J. S. (2016). Optimum path tracking control for inverse problem of vehicle handling dynamics. J. Mechanical Science and Technology 30, 8, 3433–3440.
Mccall, J. C., Trivedi, M. M., Wipf, D. and Rao, B. (2007). Lane change intent analysis using robust operators and sparse bayesian learning. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 8, 3, 431–440.
Na, X. X. and Cole, D. J. (2015). Game-theoretic modeling of the steering interaction between a human driver and a vehicle collision avoidance controller. IEEE Trans. Human-Machine Systems 45, 1, 25–38.
NHTSA (2017). Traffic Safety Facts 2015. NHTSA Technical Report. DOT-HS-812-384.
Ruder, M., Enkelmann, W. and Garnitz, R. (2002). Highway Lane Change Assistant. Proc. IEEE Intelligent Vehicle Symp., Versailles, France.
Stein, G. P., Mano, O. and Shashua, A. (2000). A robust method for computing vehicle ego-motion. Proc. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp., Dearborn, Michigan, USA.
Van Dijck, T. and Van Der Heijden, G. A. J. (2005). Vision Sense-an advanced lateral collision avoidance warning system. Proc. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp., Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Wang, J. X., Zhang, G. G., Wang, R. R., Schnelle, S. C. and Wang, J. M. (2017). A gain-scheduling driver assistance trajectory-following algorithm considering different driver steering characteristics. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 18, 5, 1097–1108.
Wang, W., Bei, S. Y., Yang, H. and Zhang, L. C. (2015). Minimum time approach to emergency collision avoidance by vehicle handling inverse dynamics. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015, Article ID 276460, 1–9.
Wang, W., Zhao, Y. Q., Bei, S. Y., Liu, W. T. and Xu, J. X. (2014). Controlling and optimization of vehicle while encountering an emergency collision avoidance. J. Vibroengineering 16, 2, 623–632.
Wu, J., Cheng, S., Liu, B. H. and Liu, C. Z. (2017). A human-machine-cooperative-driving controller based on AFS and DYC for vehicle dynamic stability. Energie 10, 11, 1–18.
Xia, X., Xiong, L., Hou, Y. Y., Teng, G. W. and Yu, Z. P. (2017). Vehicle stability control based on driver’s emergency alignment intention recognition. Int. J. Automotive Technology 18, 6, 993–1006.
Xiong, L., Teng, G. W., Yu, Z. P., Zhang, W. X. and Feng, Y. (2016). Novel stability control strategy for distributed drive electric vehicle based on driver operation intention. Int. J. Automotive Technology 17, 4, 651–663.
Yang, Q. and Koutsopoulos, H. N. (1996). A microscopic traffic simulator for evaluation of dynamic traffic management systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 4, 3, 113–129.
Yang, X. K. and Zhou, H. G. (2004). CORSIM-based simulation approach to evaluation of direct left turn versus right turn plus U-turn from driveways. J. Transportation Engineering 130, 1, 68–75.
Zhang, Y. L., Owen, L. E. and Clark, J. (1998). Multiregime approach for microscopic traffic simulation. Transportation Research Record: J. Transportation Research Board 1644, 1, 103–115.
Zong, C. F., Wang, C., Yang, D. and Yang, H. (2009). Driving intention identification and maneuvering behavior prediction of drivers on cornering. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Mechatronics and Automation, Changchun, China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, X., Zhao, Y., Zhang, W. et al. Minimum Time Lane Changing Problem of Vehicle Handling Inverse Dynamics Considering the Driver’s Intention. Int.J Automot. Technol. 20, 109–118 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-019-0010-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-019-0010-2