Abstract
Plant biomass offers a renewable and environmentally favorable source of sugars that can be converted to different chemicals, second-generation ethanol, and other liquid fuels. Cellulose makes up approximately 45 % of the dry weight of lignocellulosic biomass. Prior to the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose, lignin and hemicellulose must be structurally altered or removed, at least in part, by chemical and/or physical pretreatments. However, the high cost and low efficiency of the enzymatic hydrolysis prevent the process from being economically competitive. For this reason, it is necessary to find enzymes suitable for this type of process, with higher specific activities and greater efficiency. Members of the Bacillus and Paenibacillus genera have been traditionally used for the production of many enzymes for industrial applications. Cellulases produced by both genera have shown activity on soluble and crystalline cellulose and high thermostability and/or activity over a wide pH spectrum. In this review, the most recent information about the characterization of cellulolytic enzymes obtained from new strains of the Bacillus and Paenibacillus genera are reviewed. We focused on the variety of isoenzymes produced by these cellulolytic strains, their optimal production and reaction conditions, and their kinetic parameters and biotechnological potential.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
There is a need to diversify energy sources that are sustainable and less environmentally harmful than fossil fuels. One of the most viable options to replace or complement the demand for gasoline is ethanol [1], which is also an attractive product in the chemical and medical-pharmaceutical industries. Ethanol is non-toxic or carcinogenic when used as a fuel. Vehicles can use it without requiring major modifications in engines. Furthermore, ethanol is easy to store, transport, and distribute within the existing infrastructure [2, 3].
There are biotechnological alternatives to producing biofuels from renewable raw materials, e.g., agro-industrial wastes. These are abundant and of low cost (or none) and are not used for human consumption [4, 5]. A few examples include stover, cobs of corn, sorghum stover, barley straw, wheat, sugar cane bagasse, agave leaves, rice bran, and oats, among others. These residues are abundant and have marginal use [4]. The annual worldwide production of lignocellulosic residues from cereals is estimated to be 2802 million Mg year−1 [6]. Lignocellulosic biomass from this agricultural waste constitutes approximately 90 % of the dry weight of plants and is mainly composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. The compositions of the different residues are shown in Table 1 [3].
In Mexico, renewable energy sources have a specific legal framework, i.e., the Law on the Use of Renewable Energy and Energy Transition Financing, published in the Official Diary on 28 November 2008. This regulation establishes the obligation of the Secretary of Energy to develop a special program for the exploitation of renewable energy, a national strategy for energy transition, and a sustainable use of energy. In this context, there are several available renewable energy alternatives based on solar, wind, hydraulics, geothermal, and biological sources [7, 8].
Although Mexico has only started to commercialize first-generation ethanol as a biofuel [9], there is an insufficient production level of corn, other grains, sugar cane, and beet that will generate enough ethanol to complement the national gasoline demand. These products have other purposes, such as human consumption and livestock feed, and should not be considered for use as raw materials for the manufacture of biofuels. However, residues of these crops can be used for the production of second-generation biofuels.
The useful components of agroindustrial residues, i.e., cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin polymers, are strongly intermeshed and chemically bonded by non-covalent forces and cross-linking bonds [10]. Cellulose is approximately 45 % of the dry weight of lignocellulosic material. This linear homopolysaccharide is composed of d-glucose subunits that form cellobiose and is linked by β-1,4-glycosidic bonds. Cellulose is primarily present in crystalline form (i.e., organized chains linked by hydrogen bonds and van der Waals forces and highly resistant to enzymatic hydrolysis) and, to a lesser extent, as amorphous cellulose (i.e., unorganized chains more susceptible to enzymatic degradation) [10, 11].
Prior to the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose, lignin and hemicellulose must be structurally altered or removed, at least in part, by chemical and/or physical pretreatments [12–15]. These treatments also disrupt the crystalline structure of cellulose and increase enzyme accessibility [16, 17]. The enzymatic hydrolysis of agroindustrial waste requires a consortium of enzymes called cellulases (e.g., endocellulases, exocellulases, and β-glucosidase), ligninases (e.g., laccases, oxidases, and peroxidases), and hemicellulases (e.g., xylanase, xylosidase, arabinofuranosidase, feruloyl esterase, acetyl xylan esterase, galactosidase, and glucuronidase) [10, 18, 19]. The degradation of lignocellulosic residues is affected by factors including the source of substrate, enzymatic activity, and reaction conditions (e.g., temperature, pH, and reactant concentrations). Enzymatic treatments can be applied before or after the traditional physicochemical pretreatments of plant biomass to reduce the severity and eventually replace thermochemical processes by simplifying the processing of the raw material [13].
Cellulases consist of the following three types of enzymes: (I) endo-β-1,4-glucanases (EC 3.2.1.4), also called carboxymethylcellulases (named after the substrate used for their detection), randomly attack internal sites in amorphous cellulose to produce binding sites for subsequent attack by cellobiohydrolases; (II) exo-β-1,4-glucanases or cellobiohydrolases (EC 3.2.1.91) hydrolyze crystalline cellulose by removing monomers and dimers from the end of the glucan chain; and (III) β-glucosidases (EC 3.2.1.21) hydrolyze glucose dimers and, in some cases, cellulose oligosaccharides to glucose [18].
In addition to the biofuel industry, cellulases can also be applied in waste water treatment, starch processing, animal food production, grain alcohol fermentation, malting and brewing, the production of lactic acid and single cell proteins, the extraction of fruits and vegetables, the pulp and paper industry, and the textile industry [20, 21].
Cellulose enzymatic treatments tend to be expensive, slow, and relatively inefficient [22–26]. A few of the technical challenges in the use of cellulose at the large-scale for biofuels production include low specific enzymatic activity and high costs of cellulase production. Furthermore, cellulose is resistant to direct enzymatic attack due in part to strong protection by lignin and hemicellulose. Cellulose molecules in crystalline form are compactly packed and are impermeable to enzymes and water [27]. The hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose is considered a limiting step in the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol. For this reason, it is necessary to find new microorganisms producing enzymes suitable for this type of process and with higher specific activities and greater efficiency [28]. The characterization of these enzymes could help to accomplish cellulosic biomass breakdown at the industrial scale.
Endoglucanase activity is the first stage in the enzymatic breakdown of cellulose. A few cellulolytic microorganisms appear to secrete distinct variants of endoglucanases [29–35]. Some of these bacterial endoglucanases, mainly from extremophilic microorganisms, have been cloned, purified, and studied for their catalytic properties (e.g., optimum reaction conditions, thermal stability, variety of isoenzymes, and sometimes kinetic parameters) [20, 28, 36–44].
Because the enzymatic breakdown of cellulose is the result of a set of synergistic activities, the knowledge of the catalytic properties of individual cellulases is insufficient to determine the potential applications of an enzyme complex produced by a particular microorganism [23]. To this degree, studies have characterized cellulolytic enzyme complexes mainly of fungal origin. These works have focused on finding optimal reaction conditions or proper balances of the three cellulolytic activities [45–51]. Other studies have evaluated the behavior of enzyme complex mixtures from different fungi [25, 52–55]. However, scarce information exists on the kinetic behavior of cellulolytic enzyme complexes [35, 46, 56–59], and because enzymes can be inhibited by their own reaction products, this effect will largely determine their potential applicability [17, 22, 23, 35, 60–66].
Cellulolytic Bacteria
A wide variety of bacteria and fungi produce enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of cellulose. Bacterial enzymes that degrade vegetal biomass primarily include anaerobes, facultative anaerobes, and extremophiles (e.g., thermophiles, alkaliphiles, and halophiles). These bacterial cellulases have relatively high activity on crystalline cellulose, such as Avicel or cotton fibers [67]. However, the enzymatic degradation of cellulose remains an expensive, slow, and inefficient task. Interest in the application of these enzymes for the degradation of lignocellulose has motivated the search and isolation of these cellulolytic bacteria in different environments [22]. A few of the most studied environments have been soil samples obtained from mesophilic and extremophilic environments, where species of the order Bacillales thrive. For example, Bacillus sp. and Paenibacillus sp. have been found to produce enzymes (either as cellulosomes or secreted proteins) that hydrolyze lignocellulose to assimilate released sugars, i.e., hexoses and pentoses, as carbon sources [22, 28, 35, 42–44, 46, 68–71].
As catalysts for commercial applications, high tolerance and high temperature stability are desirable properties for enzymes. Compared with fungal cellulases, bacterial cellulases typically have better thermostability. Additionally, bacteria have shorter generation times and can easily grow to reach high cell densities using inexpensive sources of carbon and nitrogen. This provides the ability to efficiently produce great amounts of enzymes. Additionally, the expression systems and bacteria cultures are easier to handle. As such, high expression levels of endogenous cellulases in bacteria are more easily achieved than with fungal cellulases [40]. The Bacillus and Paenibacillus genera currently have a large number of applications as producers of different types of enzymes and metabolites at the industrial level [20, 72, 73]. Their commercial applications as producers of cellulases and hemicellulases need to be seriously explored. Herein, we discussed the most recent studies on the cellulolytic strains of these bacterial genera.
Bacillus and Paenibacillus Genera as Sources of Novel Cellulases
Cellulosome Producer Strains
Cellulases and hemicellulases can be secreted by cells as free enzymes or as extracellular cellulosomes. The collective action of multi-enzymatic systems can be more efficient than the activity of individual enzymes [3, 74]. Cellulosomes are supramolecular extracellular machines produced by anaerobic microorganisms belonging mainly to class Clostridia [22] and are able to degrade crystalline cellulose and other polysaccharides of the plant cell wall. Cellulosomes have also been identified in the mesophilic anaerobic species of Acetivibrio, Bacteroides, Butyrivibrio, and Ruminococcus [75–77]. However, there is evidence of the existence of cellulosomes in a facultative anaerobic bacteria of the genus Bacillus [69, 78–80] and in fungi, such as Neocallimastix, Piromyces, and Orpinomyces [81, 82]. Other cellulolytic bacteria are also speculated to produce cellulosomes [39].
Cellulosomes were first identified in 1983 by Lamed et al. [83] in Clostridium thermocellum, an anaerobic, thermophilic, and spore-forming microorganism. Cellulosomes have high activity for crystalline cellulose [67] and have also been reported in Clostridium cellulolyticum and Clostridium cellulovorans [22].
Each cellulosome contains many different and complementary types of enzymes that act on carbohydrates, including cellulases, hemicellulases, and carbohydrate esterases. Furthermore, carbohydrate-binding module (CBM) domains bind tightly to cellulose. These enzymes are held together by carrier proteins (scaffoldins) to form a multi-enzyme complex. This cellulosome arrangement improves plant cell wall degradation; the close interaction of the different enzymes exploit enzymatically accessible regions of cellulose. Intermediary products of enzymatic subunits can be quickly transferred to other subunits for their subsequent hydrolysis [74, 76, 84–87]. One advantage from a biotechnological point of view is that cellulosomes do not need to be attached to cells to function. Furthermore, cellulosomes can function in aerobic and anaerobic conditions [3]. The existence of the cellulosomes reduces energy waste in microorganisms that continuously produce and release cellulases.
Available information about mesophilic, facultative anaerobic, and cellulosome producers remains insufficient. B. megaterium has been reported to produce celluloxylanosomes (with cellulase and xylanase activities) [69]. Similarly, Paenibacillus curdlanolyticus B-6 produces two multi-enzyme cellulosome complexes (400 and 1450 kDa) with cellulolytic and xylanolytic activities. Although this bacterium was isolated from an anaerobic environment, the multi-enzyme production occurs during aerobic and mesophilic conditions [88, 89]. The facultative anaerobe Bacillus licheniformis SVD1 also produces a 2000-kDa multi-enzyme complex under aerobic mesophilic conditions [80]. For thermophilic aerobic bacteria, there are few reports about the presence of cellulosomes. The thermophilic strain belonging to the family Paenibacillaceae, Brevibacillus sp. JXL (closely related to the Bacillus and Paenibacillus genera), is one of the few examples observed by scanning electron microscopy showing protuberances, which indicated cellulosome production on the cell surface [39]. More recently, transmission electron microscopy revealed the presence of cellulosome structures in Paenibacillus polymyxa EG2 and EG14 [90, 91].
Secreted Cellulase Producer Strains
Members of the Paenibacillus and Bacillus genera are facultative anaerobes and can produce many different enzymes for industrial applications [20, 72, 73]. Table 2 shows general characteristics of cellulolytic enzymes reported for these bacterial genera. In cellulase production, a few members of Bacillus sp. have been reported to produce up to 0.26 U/mL of secreted endoglucanase in liquid culture [40], which represents a 19 times higher production with shorter culture times (between 0.03- and 0.016-fold) compared with those of fungi traditionally used for commercial production [92]. Cellulases from these two genera have shown activity on soluble and crystalline cellulose, high thermostability, and/or high activity over a wide pH spectrum [22, 35].
In 2000, Chu et al. [93] identified five extracellular proteins of Bacillus subtilis K-1, which are specifically induced when cultured in media with xylan, i.e., a polymer of xylose that constitutes most hemicelluloses. Three of these proteins were related to the metabolism of xylan and were identified as xylose isomerase produced from Clostridium thermosacchrolyticum, endo-β-1,4-xylanase from Bacillus sp. C-125, and endo-β-1,4-xylanase from Bacillus stearothermophilus. The other two identified proteins were similar to 3-dehydroquinate dehydratase produced from B. subtilis (related to quinic acid catabolism) and GltC, a regulatory protein of B. subtilis (related to the synthesis of glutamate). Furthermore, three other proteins were detected; however, these proteins showed no similarities to other proteins in available databases. The isolation of the Bacillus strains with cellulolytic activity has also been reported in semi-arid soils of Brazil and in forest soils [94, 95]. Additionally, Kim et al. [96] reported three strains (SL9-9, C5-16, and S52-2) of Bacillus isolated from soil and composts of South Korea that produced CMCase (0.2 to 0.9 U/mL), Avicelase (0.1 to 0.34 U/mL), β-glucosidase (up to 1.2 U/mL), and xylanase (2 to 12 U/mL) in submerged culture, which suggested synergic cellulolytic systems in B. subtilis. CMCase, Avicelase, and xylanase activities were observed in cell-free culture supernatants, and β-glucosidase activity was detected in cell debris. This suggested that the three enzymes were extracellular, and β-glucosidase was cell membrane bound.
The Paenibacillus genus has been reported in recent years as a producer of lignocellulose-degrading enzymes [88, 97–100]. The Paenibacillus sp. B39 strain was isolated from compost made with poultry manure. This strain produced a high molecular weight (148-kDa) cellulase having the activities of Avicelase and carboxymethylcellulase, showing the highest activity at 60 °C at pH 6.5 [38]. The Paenibacillus campinasensis BL11 strain was isolated from strongly alkaline black liquor resulting from the washing step of the Kraft process during paper pulp treatment. This strain is thermophilic and spore-forming and produces extracellular enzymes, such as xylanases, two cellulases, pectinase, and cyclodextrin glucanotransferase [37]. Most recently, Ghio et al. [101] reported the isolation of Paenibacillus sp. VG-4-A-2 and VG-4-A-3 with cellulolytic activity from soil samples of Argentine forests; these strains were closely related to Paenibacillus alvei strains. Subsequently, Ghio et al. [102] identified Paenibacillus sp. A59, which showed a broad range of hydrolytic activities, being capable of degrading carboxymethylcellulose (endoglucanase 0.45 U/mL), xylan (xylanase 3.6 U/mL), starch, pectin, casein, and chitin. Fathallh et al. [103] reported the isolation and identification of Paenibacillus woosongensis SDCB10 and SDCB11, which have the capacity to produce cellulase, xylanase, β-glucanases, and mannanases on Dubose solid medium. Shi et al. [104] reported on Paenibacillus sp. E18, which produces a bifunctional xylanase-glucanase. A wide variety of extracellular cellulases was observed in the P. polymyxa BEb-40 strain, which was isolated from decomposing sorghum straw on farmland in El Bajio, Mexico. A thermophilic strain Brevibacillus sp. JXL (belonging to the Paenibacillaceae family) was isolated from swine manure and can use crystalline cellulose, carboxymethylcellulose, xylan, cellobiose, glucose, and xylose as carbon sources [39].
Basic information on the production of cellulases by these microorganisms is scarce. The few reports that exist have only described isolating enzymes from culture broths. These enzymes have mainly been endoglucanases produced by thermophilic species of the Bacillus genus. These reports have described a few enzymatic properties, such as Michaelis-Menten constants (K m), maximum reaction rates (V max), and stabilities at extreme temperatures and pH values [28, 40–44, 68, 71]. As mentioned earlier, enzymes obtained from these extremophile microorganisms usually show optimum performance under extreme pH or temperature. The maintenance of this type of hydrolytic condition for production scale operations can be costly. Furthermore, these conditions do not facilitate the application of these enzymes in processes such as simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF), where the fermentative microorganism culture is not adapted for extreme conditions (the optimal temperature for enzymatic hydrolysis is typically close to 55 °C, while that of yeast fermentation is typically at 30 °C) [105, 106]. Herein, we show the most recent information on the qualitative and quantitative characterization of cellulolytic enzymes produced by the strains of the Bacillus and Paenibacillus genera (Table 2).
Production of Cellulases in Submerged Culture
The production of bacterial cellulolytic enzymes is preferably performed with submerged cultures due to advantages in scaling, optimization, and control. A prior study [40] reported that a maximum cellulase activity (0.26 U/mL) was reached in cultures of thermophilic B. subtilis DR grown during 24 h in a CMC-supplemented Luria broth. Other studies have reported high levels of activity in other cellulolytic bacteria of the same order of magnitude. Another study [59] isolated extremophilic strains, Bhargavaea cecembensis IARI-M-75 and Bacillus sp. IARI-AN-27, which produced 0.79 and 0.89 U/mL of endoglucanase activity, respectively, in 96 h cultures with carboxymethylcellulose-supplemented Reese’s minimal medium. Other strains from the same work produced activity levels between 0.1 and 0.8 U/mL. In contrast, a commercial enzyme complex NS50013 (Novozymes) was reported to have a specific CMCase activity of 3.1 U/mgtotal protein at pH 4.8 [107]. In comparison, purified 58-kDa cellulases from Paenibacillus spp. were reported to have activities ranging from 3.2 to 72.1 U/mg, for Avicel and CMC as substrates, respectively [108]. A recombinant endoglucanase (Endo5A) from Paenibacillus sp. MTCC 5639 and a purified enzyme from Paenibacillus barcinonensis MG7 had specific activities of 14.6–24.2 and 16.88 U/mg, respectively [20, 100, 107]. The endoglucanase complexes from P. polymyxa BEb-40 showed specific activities between 14.3 and 33.3 U/mgtotal protein (depending on reaction conditions) [35]. Interestingly, these bacterial enzymes showed higher specific activity than the fungal enzyme complexes mentioned above (Table 2).
Detection of Secreted Isoenzymes with Endoglucanase Activity
Electrophoretic and zymographic one- and two-dimensional methods were used to detect cellulolytic enzymes in culture broth samples. These methods have enabled the study of a variety of isoenzymes, the characterization of their molecular weights and isoelectric points, and their isolation and identification by mass spectrometry. Van Dyk et al. [80] described (using zymography) the presence of three endoglucanase active bands in crude supernatants obtained from cultures of B. licheniformis. Other studies have reported the existence of similar numbers of enzymes having endoglucanase activity in the Bacillus genus: one of 24.4 kDa produced by B. licheniformis [43], two secreted by B. subtilis 168 grown in LB broth, separated by 2D PAGE and identified by N-terminal sequencing [109], one of 54 kDa secreted by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens DL-3 [28], one of 55 kDa produced by B. subtilis DR [40], one of 65 kDa from Bacillus sp. [41], two of 27 and 54 kDa found in B. subtilis LN [44], and one of 52 kDa produced by B. subtilis I15 [42]. Ko et al. [37] reported the presence of three cellulases (42, 57, and 86 kDa) in the culture broths of the thermophilic bacterium P. campinasensis BL11. Another strain from the genus Paenibacillus, named B39, was observed to secrete a 148-kDa endoglucanase [38]. The strain P. polymyxa MTCC10056 was observed to produce two endoglucanases of 26.5 and 34 kDa [110]. More recently, zymograms obtained after the electrophoretic separation of crude enzymes (SDS-PAGE) enabled the detection of the activity of three cellulolytic enzymes with approximate molecular masses of 220, 200, and 130 kDa in P. polymyxa EG2 and EG14 strains; these strains were identified as cellulosome producers [91].
Although the variety of isoenzymes detected by zymography has generally been low (between 1 and 3 isoenzymes per strain), a number of endoglucanases have been described for Paenibacillus strains. Nine non-secreted endoglucanases over a wide range of molecular weights (from 63 to 216 kDa) were detected in P. curdlanolyticus B-6 [88]. Furthermore, at least 14 secreted endoglucanases with molecular weights between 38 and 220 kDa were detected in P. polymyxa BEb-40 [35] (Table 2).
Further improvements to zymographic detection techniques will surely help in detecting a growing variety of cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic isoenzymes. The environmental conditions to which cellulolytic microorganisms are subjected have fostered the evolution of isozyme complexes suitable for a wide range of environments. These different environments are favorable for the development of enzymes suitable for industrial applications.
Optimization of Enzymatic Hydrolysis
The primary environmental factors that have been studied for eliciting maximum cellulolytic activity are pH and temperature and, to a lesser extent, substrate concentration and reaction times. Herein, we list optimum temperature and pH values that have been reported for recombinant cellulases and also those that have been purified from culture broths. Lee et al. [28] described a purified cellulase (54 kDa) produced by B. amyloliquefaciens DL-3 with optimal conditions at 50 °C and pH 7.0. A 55-kDa endoglucanase from B. subtilis DR was reported to have maximum activity at 50 °C and pH 6.5 [40]. Another 65-kDa endoglucanase from Bacillus sp. achieved maximum activity at 60 °C and pH 7.0 [41]. The recombinant 52-kDa endoglucanase obtained from B. subtilis I15 showed optimal behavior at 65 °C and pH 6.0 [45]. Three endoglucanases secreted by P. campinasensis BL11 showed maximum activity at pH 7.5 and 37 °C, and a recombinant 38-kDa enzyme from the same strain was optimized at 60 °C and pH 7.0 [37, 111]. A purified 148-kDa endoglucanase secreted by Paenibacillus sp. B39 and a 58.6-kDa enzyme obtained from P. barcinonensis had optimal conditions at 60 °C and pH 6.5 and 65 °C and pH 6.0, respectively [20, 38]. Ogawa et al. [108] reported Paenibacillus spp. strains that expressed endoglucanases (approximately 58 kDa) that hydrolyzed CMC under alkaline conditions (pH 8.5) at approximately 55–60 °C. A recombinant endoglucanase, Endo5A, from Paenibacillus sp. MTCC 5639 and an enzyme, Cel5A (64 kDa), from Paenibacillus xylanilyticus were reported to have optimal hydrolysis conditions at pH 7.0 and 50 °C and pH 6.0 and 40 °C, respectively [107, 112]. CMCase activity produced by Paenibacillus terrae ME27-1 (2.08 U/mL) was optimized at a pH and temperature of 5.5 and 50 °C, respectively. The CMCase produced by this strain was stable from pH 4.0 to 11.0 at more than 60 % activity levels [113]. Interestingly, most of the reported optimal conditions occurred at pH values close to neutrality or slightly alkaline and at thermophilic temperatures. Thus, these endoglucanases have possible applications under alkaline and high-temperature conditions.
P. polymyxa BEb-40 has recently been reported to produce endoglucanases at optimal reaction conditions of 48 °C and pH 3.4. This enzyme complex showed high levels of activity of at least 70 % of the maximum activity for a wide pH range between 2 and 9 from 40 to 60 °C. These wide ranges enable the application of these enzymes in a wide variety of hydrolytic processes, including those wherein biomasses have been subjected to acidic or alkaline pretreatment over mesophilic to thermophilic temperatures. Furthermore, these enzymes can even be used in SSF processes [35]. Relatively wide pH and temperature ranges have been reported for cellulolytic complexes from other microorganisms from these genera. The enzyme complex produced by the acidophilic bacterium Bacillus sp. IARI-AN-27 can reach ≥80 % of its maximum endoglucanase activity from pH 4 to 6 and between 40 and 60 °C (with optimum conditions at pH 5 and 50 °C). The thermophilic bacterium B. cecembensis IARI-M-75 was reported to reach the same levels of activity at a pH range of 4.5 to 6.5 and from 50 to 70 °C (with optimum conditions at pH 5 and 60 °C) [59]. The endoglucanase complex produced by P. campinasensis BL11 was stable at pH between 4.5 and 9.5 [37]. Other purified endoglucanases have shown narrower ranges of stability, such as those described by Afzal et al. [41] with activities of at least 80 % of respective maximums at pH levels between 6 and 8. A 148-kDa endoglucanase purified from Paenibacillus sp. B39 retained at least 80 % of its maximum activity at a pH range from 7.0 to 8.0 [38]. A recombinant endoglucanase Endo5A from Paenibacillus sp. MTCC 5639 retained at least 80 % of its maximum activity at a pH range between 5 and 7.5 and from 40 to 70 °C [107]. As can be seen, for these two bacterial genera are enzymes with wide pH and temperature values which show high enzyme activity (Table 2).
Cellulose Hydrolysis in Long-Term Reactions
Enzymatic cellulose hydrolyses are typically carried out over prolonged reaction times due to low rates of reactions. Substrate levels affect the yield and initial rates of enzymatic reactions, and the extent of this effect is dependent on the ratio of total substrate to total enzyme [114]. For this reason, the performance of newly discovered enzymes should be evaluated under operating conditions that allow for their analysis in potential industrial applications. A number of factors should be varied, including the substrate to total protein ratio (S/TP), the reaction time, and the presence of reaction inhibitors, to determine the maximum yield of fermentable sugars. For example, for fungal purified exoglucanase Cel7A from Trichoderma reesei, Bezerra and Dias [115] reported the production of cellobiose using Avicel as a substrate. They found that the maximum cellobiose concentration after 47 h (approximately 8 g/L) was not affected for substrate/enzyme ratios between 37 and 92 (for enzyme concentrations between 600 and 1000 μg/mL and for substrate concentrations between 36,758 and 55,000 μg/mL). Similarly, Gastelum-Arellanez et al. [35], using an endoglucanase complex from P. polymyxa BEb-40, recorded CMC hydrolysis data for long-term reactions. After a 10–12-h reaction period, they found that the S/TP ratio increased up to a value of 76 had no significant effects on the CMC hydrolysis level (approximately 40 % of the theoretical maximum). The effects of the S/TP ratio are technically and economically important when considering the potential applications of enzyme complexes because high ratios allow for reduced enzyme loads and therefore, reduced costs. However, few studies have investigated the effects of this ratio for cellulolytic enzymes from Bacillus and Paenibacillus.
Kinetic Characterization of Cellulase Activity
Cellulolytic enzymes are frequently subjected to competing inhibition effects involving the product of the enzyme reactions, free sugars, and oligosaccharides. The potential applications of an enzyme complex will depend largely on its maximum reaction rate (V max), Michaelis-Menten constant (K m), and inhibition constants (K ic and K iu). Michaelis-Menten constants were reported for endoglucanases produced by Bacillus sp. IARI-AN-27 and B. cecembensis IARI-M-75 (0.11 and 0.31 % CMC, respectively) with V max values of 0.635 and 0.056 U/mg [59]. A few purified endoglucanases have shown K m values comparable with those mentioned above. A 65-kDa endoglucanase produced by Bacillus sp. had a K m value of 0.41 % CMC [41]. Likewise, a 52-kDa endoglucanase from B. subtilis I15 presented a K m of 0.36 % CMC [110]. Recombinant endoglucanases, Endo5a from Paenibacillus sp. MTCC 5639 and a 58.6-kDa enzyme from P. barcinonensis, were reported to have K m values of 0.097 and 0.05 % CMC, respectively [20, 107]. Another endoglucanase produced by P. polymyxa MTCC10056 showed a K m value of 0.87 % CMC [113].
An endoglucanase complex of P. polymyxa BEb-40 was reported to have a V max = 33.3 U/mgtotal protein, which was approximately 52 and 595 times higher than the maximum reaction rates of a few of the above-described enzymes. The K m value was 0.14 % CMC, and the inhibition constants K ic and K iu were 0.03 and 0.35 mM, respectively, i.e., up to two orders of magnitude lower than the K m, indicating an important end-product-inhibition effect [35]. The higher maximum specific activities reported for enzymes produced from these two bacterial genera would allow for decreased total enzyme loads (and decreased costs) for cellulose hydrolysis processes. However, for significant inhibitory effects, these enzymes could be used primarily in SSF processes, where the consumption of reducing sugars by the cultured microorganism would reduce the effects of end-product-inhibition. However, data on such processes have not been reported in studies of cellulolytic complexes from Bacillus and Paenibacillus. Most studies have only focused on determining the apparent values of K m and V max and have not considered the inhibitory reactions (Table 2).
Conclusion
The Bacillus and Paenibacillus genera have strains that have produced various commercially applied enzymes and metabolites. Regarding cellulases, the strains have produced enzymes with very interesting catalytic properties in industrial applications. A few of these strains are capable of producing a wide variety of isoenzymes and have high production yields in submerged cultures. These bacterial enzyme complexes have generally shown high levels of specific activity on lignocellulosic substrates, with competitive hydrolysis yields (and at times, even higher yields) comparable with most cellulolytic fungal enzymes. Furthermore, these complexes have high activity and yields over wide ranges of pH and temperatures, making them attractive and worthwhile to further explore to identify new strains for use in industrial processes for obtaining biofuels and other value-added products. The study and characterization of cellulases present in the secretomes of these cellulolytic strains will help improve the basic understanding of their behavior and generate the information and tools necessary for the development of possible commercial applications.
References
Ingram LO, Aldrich HC, Borges ACC, Cause TB, Martínez A, Morales F, Sal A, Underwood SA, Yomano LP, York SW, Zaldivar J, Zhou S (1999) Enteric bacterial catalysts for fuel ethanol production. Biotechnol Prog 15:855–866. doi:10.1021/bp9901062
Greene N (2004) Growing energy. How biofuels can help end America’s oil dependence. Natural Resources Defense Council.
U.S. DOE (2006). Breaking the biological barriers to cellulosic ethanol: a joint research agenda, DOE/SC-0095. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science and Office of Energy Effciency and Renewable Energy.
Martínez A, Bolívar F & Gosset G (2002) Biotecnología energética sustentable: Etanol carburante para el transporte. Revista Universidad de México, 617: páginas centrales. (in Spanish).
Martínez A, ME R, López-Munguía A, Gosset G (2006) ¿Etanol carburante a partir de bagazo de caña? Revista Claridades Agropecuarias 155:33–39 in Spanish
Lal R (2005) World crop residues production and implications of its use as a biofuel. Environ Int 31:571–584
Programa de Introducción de Bioenergéticos. Secretaría de Energía (2008) http://www.bioenergeticos.gob.mx/bio/descargas/Programa-Introduccion-de-Bioenergeticos.pdf. (in Spanish)
Alatorre-Frenk C (2009) Energías Renovables para el Desarrollo Sustentable en México. Secretaría de Energía (SENER), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH. Ed. por Valle-Pereña JA, Eckermann A y Barzalobre V. Forever Print S.A. de C.V., México, D.F. 70 págs. url: http://www.energia.gob.mx/. (in Spanish).
Instituto Veracruzano de Bioenergéticos (2016) Gobierno del Estado de Veracruz, México. http://www.inverbio.gob.mx/(in Spanish).
Pérez J, Muñoz-Dorado J, De la Rubia T, Martínez J (2002) Biodegradation and biological treatments of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin: an overview. Int Microbiol 5(2):53–63
Béguin P, Aubert JP (1994) The biological degradation of cellulose. FEMS Microbiol Rev 13(1):25–58
Gírio FM, Fonseca C, Carvalheiro F, Duarte LC, Marques S, Bogel-Łukasik R (2010) Hemicelluloses for fuel ethanol: a review. Bioresour Technol 101(13):4775–4800
Alvira P, Tomás-Pejó E, Ballesteros M, Negro MJ (2010) Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresour Technol 101(13):4851–4861
Li X, Clarke K, Li K, Chen A (2012) The pattern of cell wall deterioration in lignocellulose fibers throughout enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Prog 28(6):1389–1399
Vargas-Tah A, Moss-Acosta C, Trujillo-Martinez B, Tiessen A, Lozoya-Gloria E, Orencio-Trejo M, Gosset G, Martinez A (2015) Non-severe thermochemical hydrolysis of stover from white corn and sequential enzymatic saccharification and fermentation to ethanol. Bioresource Technol 198:611–618
Mosier N, Hendrickson R, Ho N, Sedlak M, Ladisch MR (2005) Optimization of pH controlled liquid hot water pretreatment of corn stover. Bioresour Technol 96(18):1986–1993
Jørgensen H, Kristensen JB, Felby C (2007) Enzymatic conversion of lignocellulose into fermentable sugars: challenges and opportunities. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 1(2):119–134
Sánchez C (2009) Lignocellulosic residues: biodegradation and bioconversion by fungi. Biotechnol Adv 27(2):185–194
Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, Van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS (2002) Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66(3):506–577
Asha BM, Revathi M, Yadav A, Sakthivel N (2012) Purification and characterization of a thermophilic cellulase from a novel cellulolytic strain, Paenibacillus barcinonensis. J Microbiol Biotechnol 22(11):1501–1509
Kumar R, Singh S, Singh OV (2008) Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass: biochemical and molecular perspectives. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 35(5):377–391
Maki M, Leung KT, Qin W (2009) The prospects of cellulase-producing bacteria for the bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass. Int J Biol Sci 5(5):500–516
Banerjee G, Scott-Craig JS, Walton JD (2010) Improving enzymes for biomass conversion: a basic research perspective. Bioenergy Res 3(1):82–92
Igarashi K, Uchihashi T, Koivula A, Wada M, Kimura S, Okamoto T, Penttilä M, Ando T, Samejima M (2011) Traffic jams reduce hydrolytic efficiency of cellulase on cellulose surface 33:1279–1282.
Suwannarangsee S, Bunterngsook B, Arnthong J, Paemanee A, Thamchaipenet A, Eurwilaichitr L et al (2012) Optimisation of synergistic biomass degrading enzyme systems for efficient rice straw hydrolysis using an experimental mixture design. Bioresour Technol 119:252–261
Greene ER, Himmel ME, Beckham GT, Tan Z (2015) Chapter three—glycosylation of cellulases: engineering better enzymes for biofuels, In: Baker DC, Horton D, (ed), Advances in carbohydrate chemistry and biochemistry 72: 63–112.
Himmel ME, Ding SY, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, Brady JW et al (2007) Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 315(5813):804–807
Lee YJ, Kim BK, Lee BH, Jo KI, Lee NK, Chung CH et al (2008) Purification and characterization of cellulase produced by Bacillus amyoliquefaciens DL-3 utilizing rice hull. Bioresour Technol 99(2):378–386
Beldman G, Voragen AGJ, Rombouts FM, Searle-van Leeuwen MF, Pilnik W (1987) Adsorption and kinetic behaviour of purified endoglucanases and exoglucanases from Trichoderma viride. Biotechnol Bioeng 30(2):251–257
Shen H, Gilkes NR, Kilburn DG, Miller RC, Warren RAJ (1995) Cellobiohydrolase B, a second exo-cellobiohydrolase from the cellulolytic bacterium Cellulomonas fimi. Biochem J 311(Pt 1):67–74
LE T II, Henrissat B, Coutinho PM, Ekborg NA, Hutcheson SW, Weiner RM (2006) Complete cellulase system in the marine bacterium Saccharophagus degradans strain 2–40. J Bacteriol 188(11):3849–3861
Badhan AK, Chadha BS, Kaur J, Saini HS, Bhat MK (2007) Production of multiple xylanolytic and cellulolytic enzymes by thermophilic fungus Myceliophthora sp. IMI 387099. Bioresour Technol 98(3):504–510
Gilbert M, Breuil C, Saddler JN (1992) Characterization of the enzymes present in the cellulase system of Thielavia terrestris 255B. Bioresour Technol 39(2):147–154
Herpöel-Gimbert I, Margeot A, Dolla A, Jan G, Mollé D, Lignon S et al (2008) Comparative secretome analyses of two Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 and CL847 hypersecretory strains. Biotechnol Biofuels 1(1):18
Gastelum-Arellanez A, Paredes-López O, Olalde-Portugal V (2014) Extracellular endoglucanase activity from Paenibacillus polymyxa BEb-40: production, optimization and enzymatic characterization. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 30(11):2953–2965
Ekborg NA, Morrill W, Burgoyne AM, Li L, Distel DL (2007) CelAB, a multifunctional cellulase encoded by Teredinibacter turnerae T7902T, a culturable symbiont isolated from the wood-boring marine bivalve Lyrodus pedicellatus. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(23):7785–7788
Ko CH, Chen WL, Tsai CH, Jane WN, Liu CC, Tu J (2007) Paenibacillus campinasensis BL11: a wood material-utilizing bacterial strain isolated from black liquor. Bioresour Technol 98(14):2727–2733
Wang CM, Shyu CL, Ho SP, Chiou SH (2008) Characterization of a novel thermophilic, cellulose-degrading bacterium Paenibacillus sp. strain B39. Lett Appl Microbiol 47(1):46–53
Liang Y, Yesuf J, Schmitt S, Bender K, Bozzola J (2009) Study of cellulases from a newly isolated thermophilic and cellulolytic Brevibacillus sp. strain JXL. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 36(7):961–970
Li W, Zhang WW, Yang MM, Chen YL (2008) Cloning of the thermostable cellulase gene from newly isolated Bacillus subtilis and its expression in Escherichia coli. Mol Biotechnol 40(2):195–201
Afzal S, Saleem M, Yasmin R, Naz M, Imran M (2009) Pre and post cloning characterization of a β-1,4-endoglucanase from Bacillus sp. Mol Biol Rep 37(4):1717–1723
Yang D, Weng H, Wang M, Xu W, Li Y, Yang H (2010) Cloning and expression of a novel thermostable cellulase from newly isolated Bacillus subtilis strain I15. Mol Biol Rep 37(4):1923–1929
Lloberas J, Perez-Pons JA, Querol E (1991) Molecular cloning, expression and nucleotide sequence of the endo-β-1,3-1,4-D-glucanase gene from Bacillus licheniformis. Predictive structural analyses of the encoded polypeptide. Eur J Biochem 197(2):337–343
Li W, Huan X, Zhou Y, Ma Q, Chen Y (2009) Simultaneous cloning and expression of two cellulase genes from Bacillus subtilis newly isolated from golden takin (Budorcas taxicolor Bedfordi. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 383(4):397–400
Falkoski DL, Guimarães VM, de Almeida MN, Alfenas AC, Colodette JL, de Rezende ST (2012) Characterization of cellulolytic extract from Pycnoporus sanguineus PF-2 and its application in biomass saccharification. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 166(6):1586–1603
Castro AM, Pedro KCNR, Cruz JC, Ferreira MC, Leite SGF, Pereira N Jr (2010) Trichoderma harzianum IOC-4038: a promising strain for the production of a cellulolytic complex with significant β-glucosidase activity from sugarcane bagasse cellulignin. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 162(7):2111–2122
AM C, de Carvalho ML d A, SG FL, Pereira N (2010) Cellulases from Penicillium funiculosum: production, properties and application to cellulose hydrolysis. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 37(2):151–158
Karboune S, Geraert PA, Kermasha S (2008) Characterization of selected cellulolytic activities of multi-enzymatic complex system from Penicillum funiculosum. J Agric Food Chem 56(3):903–909
Zhou J, Wang YH, Chu J, Luo LZ, Zhuang YP, Zhang SL (2009) Optimization of cellulase mixture for efficient hydrolysis of steam-exploded corn stover by statistically designed experiments. Bioresour Technol 100(2):819–825
Rosgaard L, Pedersen S, Langston J, Akerhielm D, Cherry JR, Meyer AS (2007) Evaluation of minimal Trichoderma reesei cellulase mixtures on differently pretreated barley straw substrates. Biotechnol Prog 23(6):1270–1276
Hill C, BR S, Tomashek J (2011) Process for enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated lignocellulosic feedstocks. Patent US 8,017,373 B2 (United States). Iogen Energy Corporation, Ontario (CA)
Viikari L, Alapuranen M, Puranen T, Vehmaanperä J, Siika-aho M (2007) Thermostable enzymes in lignocellulose hydrolysis. In: Olsson L (ed) Biofuels vol. 108 of advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 121–145
Walker LP, Belair CD, Wilson DB, Irwin DC (1993) Engineering cellulase mixtures by varying the mole fraction of Thermomonospora fusca E5 and E3, Trichoderma reesei CBHI, and Caldocellum saccharolyticum β-glucosidase. Biotechnol Bioeng 42(9):1019–1028
Irwin DC, Spezio M, Walker LP, Wilson DB (1993) Activity studies of eight purified cellulases: specificity, synergism, and binding domain effects. Biotechnol Bioeng 42(8):1002–1013
Kim E, Irwin DC, Walker LP, Wilson DB (1998) Factorial optimization of a six-cellulase mixture. Biotechnol Bioeng 58(5):494–501
Harchand RK, Singh S (1997) Characterization of cellulase complex of Streptomyces albaduncus. J Basic Microbiol 37(2):93–103
Ekperigin MM (2007) Preliminary studies of cellulase production by Acinetobacter anitratus and Branhamella sp. Afr J Biotechnol 6(1):28–33
Rastogi G, Bhalla A, Adhikari A, Bischoff KM, Hughes SR, Christopher LP et al (2010) Characterization of thermostable cellulases produced by Bacillus and Geobacillus strains. Bioresour Technol 101(22):8798–8806
Pandey S, Singh S, Yadav AN, Nain L, Saxena AK (2013) Phylogenetic diversity and characterization of novel and efficient cellulase producing bacterial isolates from various extreme environments. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 77(7):1474–1480
Holtzapple M, Cognata M, Shu Y, Hendrickson C (1990) Inhibition of Trichoderma reesei cellulase by sugars and solvents. Biotechnol Bioeng 36(3):275–287
Zhang J, Viikari L (2012) Xylo-oligosaccharides are competitive inhibitors of cellobiohydrolase I from Thermoascus aurantiacus. Bioresour Technol 117(0):286–291
Ximenes E, Kim Y, Mosier N, Dien B, Ladisch M (2010) Inhibition of cellulases by phenols. Enzym Microb Technol 46(3–4):170–176
Qing Q, Yang B, Wyman CE (2010) Xylooligomers are strong inhibitors of cellulose hydrolysis by enzymes. Bioresour Technol 101(24):9624–9630
Berlin A, Balakshin M, Gilkes N, Kadla J, Maximenko V, Kubo S et al (2006) Inhibition of cellulase, xylanase and β-glucosidase activities by softwood lignin preparations. J Biotechnol 125(2):198–209
Xiao Z, Zhang X, Gregg DJ, Saddler JN (2004) Effects of sugar inhibition on cellulases and β-glucosidase during enzymatic hydrolysis of softwood substrates. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 115(1–3):1115–1126
Tengborg C, Galbe M, Zacchi G (2001) Reduced inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated softwood. Enzym Microb Technol 28(9–10):835–844
Johnson EA, Madia A, Demain AC (1981) Chemically defined minimal medium for growth of the anaerobic cellulolytic thermophile Clostridium thermocellum. Appl Environ Microbiol 41(4):1060–1062
Ariffin H, Hassan MA, Shah UKM, Abdullah N, Ghazali FM, Shirai Y (2008) Production of bacterial endoglucanase from pretreated oil palm empty fruit bunch by Bacillus pumilus EB3. J Biosci Bioeng 106(3):231–236
Beukes N, BI P (2006) Effect of sulfur-containing compounds on Bacillus cellulosome-associated ‘CMCase’ and ‘Avicelase’ activities. FEMS Microbiol Lett 264(2):226–231
Kim CH, Kim DS (1995) Purification and specificity of a specific endo-β-1,4-D-glucanse (Avicelase II) resembling exo-cellobiohydrolase from Bacillus circulans. Enzym Microb Technol 17(3):248–254
MS O, Mohammed N, Ingram LO, Shanmugam KT (2009) Thermophilic Bacillus coagulans requires less cellulases for simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of cellulose to products than mesophilic microbial biocatalysts. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 155(1–3):379–385
Ash C, Priest FG, Collins MD (1993) Molecular identification of rRNA group 3 bacilli (Ash, Farrow, Wallbanks and Collins) using a PCR probe test. Proposal for the creation of a new genus Paenibacillus. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 64(3–4):253–260
Kim SB, Timmusk S (2013) A simplified method for gene knockout and direct screening of recombinant clones for application in Paenibacillus polymyxa. PLoS One 8(6):e68092
Bayer EA, Chancy H, Lamed R, Shoham Y (1998) Cellulose, cellulases and cellulosomes. Curr Opin Struct Biol 8(5):548–557
RH D (2008) Cellulases of mesophilic microorganisms: cellulosome and noncellulosome producers. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1125:267–279
RH D, Kosugi A (2004) Cellulosomes: plant-cell-wall degrading enzyme complexes. Nat Rev Microbiol 2(7):541–551
RH D, Kosugi A, Murashima K, Tamaru Y, SO H (2003) Cellulosomes from mesophilic bacteria. J Bacteriol 185(20):5907–5914
Waeonukul R, KL K, Sakka K, Ratanakhanokchai K (2008) Effect of carbon sources on the induction of xylanolytic-cellulolytic multienzyme complexes in Paenibacillus curdlanolyticus strain B-6. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 72(2):321–328
Kim CH, Kim DS (1993) Extracellular cellulolytic enzymes of Bacillus circulans are present as two multiple-protein complexes. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 42:83–94
Van Dyk JS, van Sakka M, Sakka K, BI P (2009) The cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic system of Bacillus licheniformis SVD1 and the evidence for production of a large multi-enzyme complex. Enzym Microb Technol 45(5):372–378
Fanutti C, Ponyi T, Black GW, Hazlewood GP, Gilbert HJ (1995) The conserved noncatalytic 40-residue sequence in cellulases and hemicellulases from anaerobic fungi functions as a protein docking domain. J Biol Chem 270(49):29314–29322
Li XL, Chen H, Ljungdahl LG (1997) Two cellulases, CelA and CelC, from the polycentric anaerobic fungus Orpinomyces strain PC-2 contain N-terminal docking domains for a cellulase-hemicellulase complex. Appl Environ Microbiol 63(12):4721–4728
Lamed R, Setter E, Kenig R, Bayer EA (1983) Cellulosome: a discrete cell surface organelle of Clostridium thermocellum which exhibits separate antigenic, cellulose-binding and various cellulolytic activities. Biotechnology and Bioengineering Symposium 13:163–181
Bayer EA, Morag E, Lamed R (1994) The cellulosome—a treasure-trove for biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 12(9):379–386
Bayer EA, Belaich JP, Shoham Y, Lamed R (2004) The cellulosomes: multienzyme machines for degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides. Annu Rev Microbiol 58:521–554
Demain AL, Newcomb M, JHD W (2005) Cellulase, clostridia and ethanol. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 69(1):124–154
Shoham Y, Lamed R, Bayer EA (1999) The cellulosome concept as an efficient microbial strategy for the degradation of insoluble polysaccharides. Trends Microbiol 7(7):275–281
Pason P, Kyu KL, Ratanakhanokchai K (2006) Paenibacillus curdlanolyticus strain B-6 xylanolytic-cellulolytic enzyme system that degrades insoluble polysaccharides. Appl Environ Microbiol 72(4):2483–2490
Waeonukul R, Kyu KL, Sakka Ky, Ratanakhanokchai K (2009) Isolation and characterization of a multienzyme complex (cellulosome) of the Paenibacillus curdlanolyticus B-6 grown on Avicel under aerobic conditions. J Biosci Bioeng 107(6):610–614
Górska E, Tudek B, Russel S (2001) Degradation of cellulose by nitrogen-fixing strain of Bacillus polymyxa. Acta Microbiol Pol 50(2):129–137
Górska EB, Jankiewicz U, Dobrzynski J, Russel S, Pietkiewicz S, Kalaji H et al (2015) Degradation and colonization of cellulose by diazotrophic strains of Paenibacillus polymyxa isolated from soil. J Biorem Biodegrad 6:271
Dinis NJ, Bezerra RMF, Nunes F, Dias AA, Guedes CV, Ferreira LMM et al (2009) Modification of wheat straw lignin by solid state fermentation with white-rot fungi. Bioresour Technol 100(20):4829–4835
Chu PW, Yap MN, CY W, Huang CM, Pan FM, Tseng MJ et al (2000) A proteomic analysis of secreted proteins from xylan-induced Bacillus sp. strain K-1. Electrophoresis 21(9):1740–1745
FL S Jr, Melo IS, Dias AC, Andreote FD (2012) Cellulolytic bacteria from soils in harsh environments. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28:2195–2203
Sudiana IM, Rahayu RD, Imanuddin H, Rahmansyah M (2001) Cellulolytic bacteria of soil of Gunung Halimun National Park. Edisi Khusus Biodiversitas Taman Nasional Gunung Halimun Berita Biologi 25:703–709
Kim JK, Lee SC, Cho YY, Oh HJ, Ko YH (2012) Isolation of cellulolytic Bacillus subtilis strains from agricultural environments. ISRN Microbiology.
Sánchez MM, Fritze D, Blanco A, Spröer C, Tindall BJ, Schumann P, Kroppenstedt RM, Diaz P, Pastor FIJ (2005) Paenibacillus barcinonensis sp. nov., a xylanase-producing bacterium isolated from a rice field in the Ebro River delta. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:935–939
Khianngam S, Akaracharanya A, Tanasupawat S, Lee KC, Lee J-S (2009a) Paenibacillus thailandensis sp. nov. and Paenibacillus nanensis sp. nov., xylanase-producing bacteria from Thai soils. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:564–568
Khianngam S, Tanasupawat S, Lee J-S, Lee KC, Akaracharanya A (2009b) Paenibacillus siamensis sp. nov., Paenibacillus septentrionalis sp. nov., and Paenibacillus montaniterrae sp. nov., xylanase-producing bacteria from Thai soils. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:130–134
Adlakha N, Rajagopal R, Kumar S, Reddy VS, Yazdani SS (2011) Synthesis and characterization of chimeric proteins based on cellulase and xylanase from an insect gut bacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol 77(14):4859–4866
Ghio S, Lorenzo GS, Lia V, Talia P, Cataldi A, Grasso D, Campos E (2012) Isolation of Paenibacillus sp. and Variovorax sp. strains from decaying woods and characterization of their potential for cellulose deconstruction. International Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 3(4):352–364
Ghio S, Insani EM, Piccinni FE, Talia PM, Grasso DH, Campos E (2016) GH10 XynA is the main xylanase identified in the crude enzymatic extract of Paenibacillus sp. A59 when grown on xylan or lignocellulosic biomass. Microbiol Res:186–187
Fathallh Eida M, Nagaoka T, Wasaki J, Kouno K (2012) Isolation and characterization of cellulose-decomposing bacteria inhabiting sawdust and coffee residue composts. Microbes Environ 27(3):226–233
Shi P, Tian J, Yuan T, Liu X, Huang H, Bai Y, Yang P, Chen X, Wu N, Yao B (2010) Paenibacillus sp. strain E18 bifunctional xylanase-glucanase with a single catalytic domain. Appl Environ Microbiol 76(11):3620–3624
Farinas CS, Loyo MM, Baraldo A, Tardioli PW, Neto VB, Couri S (2010) Finding stable cellulase and xylanase: evaluation of the synergistic effect of pH and temperature. New Biotechnol 27(6):810–815
Olofsson K, Bertilsson M, Lidén G (2008) A short review on SSF—an interesting process option for ethanol production from lignocellulosic feedstocks. Biotechnology for Biofuels 1(1)
Adlakha N, Sawant S, Anil A, Lali A, Yazdani SS (2012) Specific fusion of β-1,4-endoglucanase and β-1,4-glucosidase enhances cellulolytic activity and helps in channeling of intermediates. Appl Environ Microbiol 78(20):7447–7454
Ogawa A, Suzumatsu A, Takizawa S, Kubota H, Sawada K, Hakamada Y et al (2007) Endoglucanases from Paenibacillus spp. form a new clan in glycoside hydrolase family 5. J Biotechnol 129(3):406–414
Tjalsma H, Antelmann H, Jongbloed JD, Braun PG, Darmon E, Dorenbos R et al (2004) Proteomics of protein secretion by Bacillus subtilis: separating the “secrets” of the secretome. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68(2):207–233
Kumar D, Ashfaque M, Muthukumar M, Singh M, Garg N (2012) Production and characterization of carboxymethyl cellulase from Paenibacillus polymyxa using mango peel as substrate. J Environ Biol 33(1):81–84
Ko CH, Tsai CH, Lin PH, Chang KC, Tu J, Wang YN et al (2010) Characterization and pulp refining activity of a Paenibacillus campinasensis cellulase expressed in Escherichia coli. Bioresour Technol 101(20):7882–7888
Park IH, Chang J, Lee YS, Fang SJ, Choi YL (2012) Gene cloning of endoglucanase Cel5A from cellulose-degrading Paenibacillus xylanilyticus KJ-03 and purification and characterization of the recombinant enzyme. Protein J 31(3):238–245
Liang YL, Zhang Z, Wu M, Wu Y, Feng JX (2014) Isolation, screening, and identification of cellulolytic bacteria from natural reserves in the subtropical region of China and optimization of cellulase production by Paenibacillus terrae ME27-1. Biomed. Res. Int. 512497.
Sun Y, Cheng J (2002) Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour Technol 83(1):1–11
Bezerra RMF, Dias AA (2004) Discrimination among eight modified Michaelis-Menten kinetics models of cellulose hydrolysis with a large range of substrate/enzyme ratios: inhibition by cellobiose. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 112(3):173–184
Lee J (1997) Biological conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol. J Biotechnol 56(1):1–24
Wiselogel A, Tyson S and Jhonson D (1996) Biomass feedstock resources and composition In: Hand-book on bioethanol: production and utilization. Wyman CE (ed), Taylor & Francis. Applied Energy Technology Series, pages 105–118.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Bioenergy Thematic Network (“Red Temática de Bioenergía”) for grant no. 260457.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Orencio-Trejo, M., De la Torre-Zavala, S., Rodriguez-Garcia, A. et al. Assessing the Performance of Bacterial Cellulases: the Use of Bacillus and Paenibacillus Strains as Enzyme Sources for Lignocellulose Saccharification. Bioenerg. Res. 9, 1023–1033 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-016-9797-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-016-9797-0