Introduction

Minerals fulfil several important functions for the maintenance of animal growth and reproduction as well as health status [1, 2]. A number of trace elements have been shown to be important for adequate functioning of the immune system, among which copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn) play a major role. Cu can effectively maintain the stability of the internal environment and is closely related to growth, health status, haematopoiesis, metabolism, and reproduction [3]. Cu is part of the active sites of many enzymes, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), ceruloplasmin, cytochrome oxidase, L-lysine oxidase, ascorbate oxidase, tyrosinase, and dopamine beta-hydroxylase [4]. Among the principal enzymes, ceruloplasmin (Cp) and Cu–Zn-superoxide dismutase (SOD) are the major Cu-containing antioxidant enzymes. Ceruloplasmin (Cp) may function as an antioxidant in two different ways: by binding to Cu and Cp prevents free Cu ions from catalysing oxidative damage. Involvement of Cu in antioxidant defense protects cell membranes from damage caused by free radicals or oxidative stress. Cu actively participates in immune processes and, by contributing to the transformation of arachidonic acid and prostaglandin synthesis, it plays a vital role in reducing the severity of inflammatory processes. By taking part in the oxidation of membrane thiol groups to disulphides, it stabilizes the permeability of cell membranes [5]. Both deficiency and excessive of Cu have been reported to reduce several aspects of immune response in animal models, including neutrophil numbers and its phagocytic activity, lymphocyte proliferation, and antigen-specific antibody production [6]. Cu added at a higher level than normal requirements has a growth promoting effect because Cu inhibits intestinal harmful microbes, so it has the function to stimulate growth and improve feed efficiency [7].

Similar to Cu, Zn also influences various biological functions and is a cofactor for more than 300 metallo-enzymes [8]. Zn is essential for the body’s proper physiological functions like growth [9], health status, reproduction [10], DNA synthesis, cell division and gene expression [11], wound healing [12], ossification [13], augmenting the immune system of the body [14], lymphocyte replication and proliferation, and protection of cell membranes from bacterial endotoxins and antibody production [15]. There is an increase in the immunoglobulin level in blood serum as well as colostrum by supplementing organic Zn [16]. A significantly higher total IgG concentration was observed in the Zn-supplemented calves than in the control calves [17]. Zn may play a key role in the suppression of free radicals and in the inhibition of NADPH-dependent lipid peroxidation, as well as in the prevention of lipid peroxidation via inhibiting glutathione depletion [18]. Along with Cu, Zn is the primary cytosolic superoxide detoxification enzyme in eukaryotes. It has been assumed that SOD has a central role in the defense against oxidative stress. Zn has been considered an effective anti-inflammatory and anti-diarrheal agent [19]. Optimum dietary Zn supplementation is essential for the growth of the animals, and lower levels of Zn in the diet are associated with a negative effect on growth performance and feed intake [9]. Steers that were deficient in Zn had a decrease in fractional protein degradation and protein accretion when compared to control steers with an adequate Zn status. As a result, decreases in ending body weight, average daily gain (ADG), and gain to feed (G: F) efficiency were observed [17]. Oral Zn supplementation has been used in the prevention and treatment of diarrhoea in infants and children, but also in animals [20], because it improves immune function, reduces the number of pathogenic bacteria, and increases the relative abundance of beneficial gastrointestinal microbes [21].

Nano minerals have unlimited potential as mineral feed supplements in animals, even at very lower doses than the conventional organic and inorganic sources [22]. The use of nanominerals, such as nano Cu or nano Zn, however, may increase the animal production parameters, their healthiness, and the quality of products obtained from them. In addition, the objectives of using nanoparticles in animal feed are to reduce the number of harmful bacteria and stimulate the growth of beneficial bacteria, which may improve the growth performance of animals [23]. So far, numerous studies have been carried out regarding the use of nanominerals in ruminant nutrition. In the past, numerous studies in farm animals have been conducted with organic and inorganic sources of supplementation. Furthermore, studies with nano Cu and nano Zn are restricted until separate use of these minerals. None of the studies has been conducted to see the effect of nano Cu and nano Zn in combination. Studies on the effect of nano Cu and nano Zn on the diarrheal occurrence and other health status attributes in young dairy calves are also lacking. Considering these facts, this study was designed to study the effects of either nano Cu or nano Zn alone or in combination on the biomarkers of immunity and antioxidant status and health conditions. We hypothesized that supplementation of Cu and Zn nanoparticles would improve the health status of young dairy calves by reducing the incidence of diarrhoea and improving the immune response and antioxidant activity.

Materials and Methods

Animals, Diets, and Experimental Design

A total of 24 young dairy calves were randomly assigned to four dietary treatments on a body weight (27.52 ± 3.43 kg) and age (25.33 ± 8 days) basis for a period of 120 days. The experimental calves either received a basal diet devoid of supplemental nano Cu and nano Zn (control group) or were supplemented with 10 ppm of nano Cu (nanoCu10) as cupric oxide nanopowder (CuO, molecular weight 79.54, minimum assay purity 99%, Sisco Research Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. India), 32 ppm of nano Zn (nanoZn32) as zinc oxide nanopowder type 1 (ZnO, molecular weight 81.38, minimum assay purity 99.9%, Sisco Research Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. India), or a combination of nano Cu and nano Zn, i.e. 10 ppm nano Cu + 32 ppm nano Zn (nanoCu10 + nanoZn32). The nutrient requirements of calves were met by feeding milk, calf starter, available green fodder, and wheat straw NRC [24]. Milk and calf starter were offered at the rates of 10% and 1% of the body weight, respectively. Berseem fodder and wheat straw were available ad libitum. Calves were housed in a well-ventilated shed having the proper arrangement for feeding and watering. Deworming of all the experimental animals was done before the start of the experiment by the oral administration of Fentas bolus (Intas Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., India) at a dose level of 10 mg/kg body weight. The nutrient composition of feedstuffs and milk fed during the experimental period is presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Nutrient composition (%) of diet fed during the experimental period

Observation Recorded and Analytical Procedures

The body weight of the experimental calves was recorded at the start of experiment and then at a fortnightly interval by using a computerized weighing machine (Leotronic Scales Pvt. Ltd., India). Calves were weighed for 2 consecutive days in the morning at 06:00 h before offering feeds, fodders, and water. The average of consecutive 2 days was considered BW for that fortnight and was considered for average daily gain (ADG). Samples of feeds and fodders offered and leftover residue were dried in a hot air oven at 60 °C until a constant weight was achieved and then ground to pass through a 1-mm sieve in a Wiley mill. The samples were analysed for DM (method 973.18c), CP (method 4.2.08), ether extract (EE; method 920.85), and total ash (TA; method 923.03) [25]. Neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and acid detergent fibre (ADF) were determined according to the procedures described by Van Soest et al. [26]. Mineral content in feeds and fodders and milk was determined by using ICP-OES (5800 ICP-OES, Agilent, CA, USA).

Peripheral blood samples were collected before feeding and watering of heifers at 07:00 h in heparinised vacuutainer tubes (BD Franklin, USA) at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 days post-nano Cu and nano Zn supplementation. Collected blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 30 min to remove the plasma from packed erythrocytes. Samples of plasma were stored at − 20 °C until further analysis. IgG, IgM, IgA, IgE, INF-γ, TNF-α, cortisol, SOD, CAT, Cp, and GSH-Px were estimated in plasma by using bovine specific ELISA Test Kits (Bioassay Technologies, China). The minimum detectable levels was 1.03 µg/mL for IgG, 0.054 µg/mL for IgM, 0.045 µg/mL for IgA, 14.96 ng/mL for IgE, 2.35 pg/mL for IFN-γ, 5.56 ng/L for TNF-α, 0.20 ng/mL for cortisol, 0.26 ng/Ml for SOD, 0.28 ng/mL for CAT, 0.24 IU/L for Cp, and 0.31 ng/mL for GSH-Px. TAS is measured as the ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay procedure described by Benzie and Strain [27]. The ZST unit was estimated by the zinc turbidity method [28]. The MDA was estimated by the method of Shafiq-Ur-Rehman [29]. TIg was determined by the addition of IgG, IgM, IgA, and IgE.

Diarrhoea frequency, time until resolution of diarrhoea, incidence of diarrhoea, faecal consistency score (FCS), attitude score, no calves affected with pneumonia, no calves affected with joint ill, and no calves affected with navel ill and calf mortality attributes were used to access the health status of experimental calves. The incidence of diarrhoea in each group was calculated using the following formula:

$$\mathrm{Incidence}\;\mathrm{of}\;\mathrm{diarrhoea}(\%)=\frac{\mathrm{Diarrhoeal}\;\mathrm{calves}\;\mathrm{in}\;\mathrm{each}\;\mathrm{group}\times\mathrm{diarrhoea}\;\mathrm{days}}{\mathrm{Total}\;\mathrm{calves}\;\mathrm{in}\;\mathrm{each}\;\mathrm{group}\times\mathrm{experimental}\;\mathrm{days}}\times100$$

FCS was given according to Pazoki et al. [30] as (1) firm and well-formed, (2) soft and pudding-like, (3) runny and pancake batter, and (4) liquid and splatters. A calf with an attitude score of 1 was bright, alert, and readily stood with stimulation; a calf with a score of 2 was quiet, alert, and stood only with moderate stimulation; a calf with a score of 3 exhibited a dull mentation and remained recumbent in response to stimulation. Apart from these health attributes, the faeces of diarrheal calves were also observed for causative bacteria by using Mac Conkey Lactose agar (MLA). Biochemical characterization of E. coli was done by using different biochemical tests such as oxidase test, catalase test, indole production, Voges–Proskauer (VP) test, methyl-red test, and citrate test.

Statistical Analysis

The generated data was analysed by using theMIXED procedure of SPSS (Version 20.0, Inc., Chicago, IL) [31], using repeated measures. The model used was as follows:

$$Yijk = \mu + Ti + Dj + (T\times D) ij + eijk$$

where, Yijk is the dependent variable, μ is the overall mean of the population, Ti is the mean effect of the treatment (0, 10 ppm Cu, 32 ppm Zn, and 10 ppm Cu + 32 ppm Zn), Dj is the mean effect of period of blood sampling (0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 days post-treatment), (T × D)ij is the effect of the interaction between the effect of treatment and the period of blood sampling, and eijk is the unexplained residual element assumed to be independent and normally distributed. The effects of treatment, period, and treatment by period interaction were considered fixed and calf as a random effect. If the analysis revealed a significant effect, the differences between treatment, period, and treatment by period interaction were then determined by Duncan’s post hoc test at p ≤ 0.05. Results are presented as least squares means and pooled standard errors of the means (SEMs).

Results

Biomarkers of Immunity

In this study, plasma IgG, IgM, IgA, IgE, TIg, INF-γ, TNF-α, cortisol, ZST units, and WBCs count were used as the biomarkers of immunity. The plasma concentrations of these biomarkers in different groups are depicted in Table 2. Treatment showed a significant (p < 0.05) effect on plasma IgG concentration, and IgG levels were reported the highest in the combination group (Fig. 1). As similar to the trend of IgG, the nanoCu10 + nanoZn32 group showed a greater (p < 0.05) IgM (Fig. 2) and IgA (Fig. 3) concentration in comparison to the calves in other groups. The feeding of a diet supplemented with either nano Cu or nano Zn alone or in combination did not exert any significant effect on the plasma IgE concentrations. TIg showed a significant (p < 0.05) effect of nano Cu and nano Zn supplementation, with the highest values being observed in the nanoCu10 + nanoZn32 group. There was no effect of treatment on plasma IFN-γ concentration. However, TNF-α concentrations were observed significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the calves fed on the diet supplemented with both nano Cu as well as nano Zn. The experimental calves in nanoCu10 + nanoZn32 group showed a significant (p < 0.05) lower plasma cortisol (Fig. 4) and higher ZST units, whereas no effect of either Cu or Zn alone or in combination was observed on WBC counts. There were no effects of period and treatment × period interaction on studied immunity biomarkers.

Table 2 Effect of nano Cu nano Zn supplementation on immune response and antioxidant activity
Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of nano Cu and nano Zn supplementation on plasma IgG concentration (where single asterisk “*” denotes significant as p < 0.05 and double asterisk “**” denotes highly significant as p < 0.001)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of nano Cu and nano Zn supplementation on plasma IgM concentration (where single asterisk “*” denotes significant as p < 0.05)

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of nano Cu and nano Zn supplementation on plasma IgA concentration (where single asterisk “*” denotes significant as p < 0.05 and double asterisk “**” denotes highly significant as p < 0.001)

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of nano Cu and nano Zn supplementation on plasma cortisol concentration here single asterisk “*” denotes significant as p < 0.05 and double asterisk “**” denotes highly significant as p < 0.001)

Biomarkers of Antioxidant Status

The plasma MDA, SOD, CAT, GSH-Px, Cp, and TAS concentrations were used as the biomarkers of antioxidant status (Table 2). Treatment showed a significant (p < 0.05) effect on the plasma concentration of MDA, SOD, GSH-Px, Cp, and TAS. The effect on plasma MDA concentration began on day 60 of the experiment, and lowest concentration of MDA was observed in the nanoCu10 + nanoZn32 groups in comparison to other groups (Fig. 5). However, the activity of SOD (Fig. 6) and GSH-Px (Fig. 7) was observed to be greater (p < 0.05) in the calves of the combination group where they are fed on the diet supplemented with both nano Cu and nano Zn. The treatment effect on SOD activity began on the day 90 of the experiment and continued till the end of the study. The feeding of a diet supplemented with 10 ppm of nano Cu, or 32 ppm of nano Zn or their combination did not exert any significant effect on plasma CAT activity. Treatment showed a significant (p < 0.05) effect on plasma Cp concentration, with higher Cp concentrations which were observed in nano Cu-supplemented groups, i.e. nanoCu10 and nanoCu10 + nanoZn32 groups than in other groups (Fig. 8). Better (p < 0.05) TAS activity was observed in nanoCu10 + nanoZn32 group (Fig. 9). There was no significant effect of period and treatment × period interaction on the biomarkers of antioxidant status.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effect of nano Cu and nano Zn supplementation on plasma MDA concentration (where single asterisk “*” denotes significant as p < 0.05 and double asterisk “**” denotes highly significant as p < 0.001)

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effect of nano Cu and nano Zn supplementation on SOD activity (where single asterisk “*” denotes significant as p < 0.05 and double asterisk “**” denotes highly significant as p < 0.001)

Fig. 7
figure 7

Effect of nano Cu and nano Zn supplementation on GSH-Px activity (where single asterisk “*” denotes significant as p < 0.05 and double asterisk “**” denotes highly significant as p < 0.001)

Fig. 8
figure 8

Effect of nano Cu and nano Zn supplementation on plasma Cp concentration (where single asterisk “*” denotes significant as P < 0.05 and double asterisk “**” denotes highly significant as p < 0.001)

Fig. 9
figure 9

Effect of nano Cu and nano Zn supplementation on plasma TAS concentration (where single asterisk “*” denotes significant as p < 0.05 and double asterisk “**” denotes highly significant as p < 0.001)

Growth Performance and Health Status

Table 3 shows the findings regarding the effect of nano Cu and nano Zn supplementation on the growth performance and health status attributes. Although the mean ADG in treatment groups was numerically high but statistical analysis of the data revealed a non-significant effect of treatment. The number of calves affected by diarrhoea was lower in the nano Zn and combination groups than in the nano Cu and control groups. However, the frequency of diarrhoea, time until resolution of diarrhoea, and incidence of diarrhoea were lower (p < 0.05) in the nano Zn and nanoCu10 + nanoZn32 group. The FCS and attitude score were also better (p < 0.05) in the nano Zn and combination groups. One calf was found affected with joint ill and two calves were found affected with navel ill in control group. No cases of calf mortality or pneumonia were reported in all four groups. Calves affected by diarrhoea were also analysed for the causative agent. After Gram’s staining and bio-chemical examination, the following IMViC patterns were presented: + , + , -, -. This IMViC pattern is suggestive of E. coli.

Table 3 Effect of nano Cu and nano Zn supplementation on growth performance and health status

Discussion

Biomarkers of Immunity

In the present study, the experimental calves fed on the diet supplemented with the combination of nano Cu and nano Zn had better immunity which was evidenced from higher plasma concentrations of IgG, IgM, IgA, and TIg and lower plasma TNF-α and cortisol concentrations in nanoCu10 + nanoZn32 group. The concentrations of circulating immunoglobulins, especially IgG, IgM, and IgA, are important indicators of immune function. No work has been conducted to see the combined effect of nano Cu and nano Zn on immune response in animals. Therefore, the findings of the present study have been discussed with those of the others who used any source of Cu and Zn separately or in combination. Kushwaha et al. [32] observed a significant (p < 0.05) improvement in immune response in nano Cu-supplemented Sahiwal heifers. He indicated that nano Cu does not have pro-inflammatory properties and does not interact with humoral responses in growing heifers. Pineda et al. [33] found the same results that the expression of immune-related genes (TNF-α) was not affected, indicating the absence of the pro-inflammatory property of nano CuO. Gonzales-Eguia et al. [34] showed significant improvements in the IgG and γ-globulin levels of the nano Cu group of piglets. Ognik et al. [35] also reported increased immune defense of chickens by supplementing their diets with nano-Cu. Compared with the control group, the dietary supplementation with 100 mg/kg of nano-Cu significantly increased the concentrations of IgA, IgG, IgM, and lysozyme in the serum of broilers [36]. It could be explained by the fact that the immunoglobulin’s enhancement may be the result of the activation of phagocytes, which indicates an improved immune status of broilers after nano Cu treatment [35]. Another study reported that nano Cu-loaded chitosan improved immune status, enhanced protein synthesis, and was beneficial to the caecal microbiota of broiler chickens [36].

Zn plays a role in molecular and membrane stability. One of the first lines of defense the body has against an immunological attack is the skin. The most direct connection between Zn and immune function is its role in cell replication and proliferation, which is of great importance for maintaining the normal activity and integrity of immune cells and systems (Wang et al.) [37]. Sharish et al. [38] reported that plasma total immunoglobulin concentration was found higher in the nano Zn-supplemented group than the control group at 30, 60, and 90 days, and total immunoglobulin concentration was found higher in the inorganic Zn-supplemented group than the control group. He concluded that nano Zn supplementation at 25 and 50 ppm has better immunogenic effects and thus may replace inorganic Zn sources at a lower level of Zn, i.e. 25 ppm. Nagalakshmi et al. [39] demonstrated that administration of a low level of organic Zn improves growth performance and the immune response of calves. Consistent with these findings, they found that ZnO supplementation increased serum IgG and IgM concentrations above those of the control by 3.85 and 2.86 mg/mL, respectively, compared with Zn-methionine supplementation, indicating that the administration of a low level of ZnO is superior to Zn-methionine with respect to the immune function of dairy calves. Serum IgG, IgM, and IgA can protect the extra vascular compartment against pathogenic viruses and microorganisms [40], so the increase in the levels of serum IgG and IgM indicates that weaned piglets fed on diets supplemented with nano ZnO may undergo improvements in immune function. Feng et al. [41] reported an improvement in IgA, IgM, and IgG levels with the dietary replacement of 120 mg/kg of inorganic Zn with 90 or 120 mg/kg of organic Zn. In the study of Chang et al. [42], total serum IgG and IgM concentrations in the ZnO group were significantly higher than in the control group. Similarly, Nagalakshmi et al. [43] and Wang et al. [37] observed better immune responses with organic Zn supplementation compared to inorganic Zn supplementation in lambs and dairy cows, respectively. Engle et al. [44] implied that when cattle are in a Zn deficient state, cell-mediated immune responses are decreased, making calves more susceptible to infectious disease.

Biomarkers of Antioxidant Status

Antioxidant status is known to be a significant predictor of disease and mortality in infants, especially premature infants. In present study, plasma MDA level was used as biomarker of oxidative stress, whereas SOD, CAT, GSH-Px, Cp, and TAS were used as the biomarkers of antioxidant status. Similar to the immune response, the calves supplemented with a combination of nano Cu and nano Zn showed better antioxidant status than calves in control, nano Cu, or nano Zn alone groups. Better antioxidant status in the nanoCu10 + nanoZn32 group is evidenced by lower MDA concentrations and higher SOD, GSH-Px, Cp, and TAS activity in this group. Pineda et al. [45] found that the nano Cu injection reduced lipid oxidation, which could be associated with the lower O2 consumption in broiler chicks. SOD is one of the main antioxidants (Cu–Zn linked metallo-enzymes), which can remove excess free radicals in the body and reduce the degree of nucleic acid damage [46]; Zhao et al. [47]. There was a significant (p < 0.05) improvement in antioxidant status in nano Cu-supplemented groups in Sahiwal heifers, and nano Cu supplementation improves mRNA expression of SOD and CAT genes [32]. Shen et al. [48] showed that when compared with the Cu-deprived goats, serum SOD, GSH-Px, CAT, and total antioxidant capacity in the nano Cu and CuSO4 groups were significantly higher, while serum MDA content was significantly lower. Likewise, Vaswani et al. [49] found that antioxidant activity (TAS) was higher in heifers receiving Cu-supplemented diets. Dezfoulian et al. [50] also reported that Cu source had a significant effect on Cp concentration (p < 0.05) in lambs. Total antioxidant capacity, SOD, and GSH-Px were more in the birds fed diet inclusion of 60 and 90 mg nano CuO than other treatments and lowest MDA level was observed [51]. The antioxidant mechanisms of the blood, reflected by elevated catalase and plasma FRAP, became more intensive during nano-Cu supplementation in wistar rats [52]. The replacement of inorganic Cu with nano Cu differentially modulated the redox status of selected tissues, i.e. enhanced SOD activity in small intestinal tissue and decreased total glutathione levels in the bursa of fabricius of turkeys [53]. The nano-Cu supplementation in the rabbit significantly increased the activity of the SOD enzyme compared with the control group, but catalase activity was unaffected [54]. On the contrary, Dezfoulian et al. [50] observed that Cu supplementation (regardless of source and level) had no significant effect on SOD activity in lambs.

The antioxidant effect of Zn may be mediated through direct action of the Zn ion, its structural role in antioxidant proteins, and modulation of metallothionein induction. The direct antioxidant activity of Zn ions is associated with their binding to thiol groups, thus protecting them from oxidation [55, 56]. Sharish et al. [38] reported that plasma SOD concentration was found higher in the nano Zn-supplemented group than in the control group and inorganic Zn-supplemented group at 30, 60, and 90 days, and TAS concentration increased within all groups over the time, and TAS concentration was higher in all treatment groups than the control group. Wang et al. [57] reported that the serum SOD levels increased and MDA levels decreased with the inclusion of ZnO and 0.4–0.6 mg/kg nano-ZnO in their diets in weaning piglets. These results are similar to the findings of Zhao et al. [12], who observed that dietary supplementation with 0.06 and 0.1 g/kg nano ZnO improved serum Cu–Zn-SOD activity but decreased serum MDA levels in broilers on days 28 and 35. Bakhshizade et al. [58] noticed in cows that the SOD concentration was higher in the nano Zn and Zn-Glycine-supplemented groups than in the inorganic Zn-supplemented group. Zn as Zn oxide nanoparticles in Japanese quails and broiler chickens improved the total antioxidant capacity and reduced the MDA concentrations compared to controls [12, 59]. The activity of GSH-Px increased in high Zn and coated nano ZnO fed pigs compared with the control group. Pigs fed on coated nano ZnO had a higher activity of serum SOD (p < 0.05) compared with the control and high Zn groups [60]. Furthermore, the antioxidant capacity of growing pigs is fundamental for maintaining the normal metabolic state to protect a pig’s health; we hypothesized that the effects of dietary nano ZnO could promote growth by indirectly regulating the antioxidant capacity of pigs. High doses of ZnO (3000 mg/kg) supplementation reduced the serum MDA concentration and increased the SOD activity in piglets [61]. His findings also show that pigs fed a high dose of ZnO had an improved antioxidant capacity by increasing GSH-Px activity. Meanwhile, a low dose of coated nano ZnO could increase the activities of SOD and GSH-Px in the serum. Previous studies have shown that Zn has an antioxidant function [17], and supplementation with Zn methionine reportedly decreases the concentration of MDA but increases that of MT and T-AOC in the serum of ruminants [62].

Growth Performance and Health Status

Dietary supplementation of either nano Cu or nano Zn alone or in combination did not exert any impact on the growth performance of the experimental calves. Kushwaha et al. [32] found no effects of 10 ppm inorganic Cu, 5.0 and 10.0 ppm nano Cu on the growth performance in growing Sahiwal heifers, which was similar to the findings of our study. Vaswani et al. [49] reported a similar observation that supplementing 8.0 mg Cu/kg DM either in the form of Cu-proteinate, Cu-propionate, or Cu sulphate did not affect ADG in growing heifers. Kim et al. [63] also found a similar effect on growth performance in nano Cu-supplemented pigs compared with inorganic and organic Cu. The results of the present study are similar to the observations of Dezfoulian et al. [50] who reported that there was no significant effect of Cu supplementation on ADG in lambs. Waghmare et al. [64] observed that supplementation of Cu as CuSO4 and Cu-methionine did not alter ADG and feed: gain ratio in kids. However, in contrast to the findings of the present study, some studies compared the inorganic forms of Cu with nano Cu and the latter showed an improvement in the growth performance of piglets [34, 65]. Zhang et al. [66] reported that supplementation of the basal diet with 10 mg Cu/kg DM in the basal diet enhanced growth performance in Cashmere goats. Chang et al. [65] reported that dietary supplementation with 25 mg/kg body weight nano Cu improves the performance of weaning piglets.

No significant difference in body weight observed on supplementation of different levels and different sources of Zn has been observed in previous research, though overall body weight increases as the age of experimental animal advances. Zn supplementation above NRC (2001) recommended requirements did not consistently affect growth rate in cattle [67]. The results of the present study are similar to the observations of Zaboli et al. [68], who reported that ADG in goat kids was not affected due to the supplementation of Zn from different sources at different levels. However, contrary to the findings of present study, Chang et al. [42] showed that supplementation with Zn-methionine but not ZnO significantly increased the ADG of new-born calves in the first 2 weeks after birth. Anil et al. [69] observed significantly higher body weight gain and ADG in the 20 ppm nano Zn-supplemented calves group, followed by 10 ppm nano Zn, 5 ppm nano Zn-supplemented groups, and the 25 ppm ZnSO4 group. Hongfu et al. [70] observed a significant increase in ADG in the nano-Zn oxide (200, 400, and 600 mg/kg)-supplemented group and higher ZnO (3000 mg/kg)-supplemented piglet groups compared to the no Zn-supplemented group. The discrepancy in growth performance in the findings of different studies may be a consequence of different sources and levels of Cu and Zn used, differing ages of animals used in the study, differences in study period, different genetics in various breeds, etc.

In the present study, the frequency of diarrhoea, incidence of diarrhoea, FCS, attitude score, pneumonia occurrence, joint ill and navel ill, and mortality were used to assess the health status of the experimental calves. The number of calves affected by diarrhoea, frequency of diarrhoea, time until resolution of diarrhoea, and incidence of diarrhoea was lower in the nanoZn32 and nanoCu10 + nanoZn32 groups. FCS and attitude scores were also better in the nano Zn and combination groups. One calf from the control group was found affected with joint ill and two calves from the control group were found affected with navel ill. No any case of calf mortality and pneumonia were reported in all four groups. Calves having diarrhoea were found affected by E. coli. The anti-diarrheal function of Cu and Zn may be associated with their role in immunity [19, 71]. The mechanisms of the anti-diarrheal effect of Zn are thought to involve the regulation of intestinal fluid transport and mucosal integrity, the promotion of immunity, and the modulation of oxidative stress [72, 73]. Wang et al. [74] reported that the incidence of diarrhoea in control calves fluctuated between 20 and 34.29% during the first 2 weeks of life. However, supplementation with ZnO or Zn-Met helped to reduce the incidence of diarrhoea in neonatal dairy calves during their early lives, and no diarrhoea was found in calves in the ZnO group during the first 3 d after birth, which is consistent with previous findings [74, 75]. In addition, supplementation with Zn reduced the incidence of diarrhoea, which is consistent with the results obtained by Feldmann et al. [20], who showed that Zn-Met-treated calves had a 14.7% lower risk of diarrhoea than placebo-treated calves. Hu et al. [76] reported that 0.3 g/kg Zn as nano ZnO inclusion in the diet decreased the incidence of diarrhoea in early weaned piglets (5.7 kg), exhibiting a similar effect to 3.0 g/kg Zn as ZnO administration in a 14-day experiment. Dietary ZnO at therapeutic concentrations of 2000 to 4000 mg/kg could effectively prevent and treat post-weaning diarrhoea [77]. Limited information is available on the role of Cu in controlling calf diarrhoea. Within individual calves, the onset of diarrhoea, incidence of leg abnormalities, and anaemia were correlated with the onset of Cu deficiency and are indicative of relatively severe deficiency [78].

Conclusions

The findings of the present study revealed that supplementation of nano Cu along with nano Zn improves immune response as well as antioxidant status compared to a diet supplemented with either nano Cu or nano Zn alone. Nano Cu and nano Zn supplementation did not influence growth performance. However, supplementation of nano Cu in combination with nano Zn showed a lower frequency of diarrhoea, time until resolution of diarrhoea, and incidence of diarrhoea. FCS and attitude scores were also better in the nano Zn and combination groups. Taking into account the beneficial effects of nano Cu or nano Zn on immunity and antioxidant status and health status attributes, the use of nano Cu in combination with nano Zn should be considered in young dairy calves.