Abstract
Arsenic is a well-known element because of its toxicity. Humans as well as plants and animals are negatively affected by its exposure. Some countries suffer from high levels of arsenic in their tap water and soils, which is considered a primary arsenic-linked risk factor for living beings. Humans generally get exposed to arsenic by contaminated drinking waters, resulting in many health problems, ranging from cancer to skin diseases. On the other hand, the FDA-certified drug arsenic trioxide provides solutions for various diseases, including several types of cancers. This issue emphasizes the importance of speciation of the metalloid elements in terms of impacts on health. When species get exposed to arsenic, it affects the cells altering their involvement. It can lead to abnormalities in inflammatory mechanisms and the immune system which contribute to the negative impacts generated on the body. The poisoning originating from arsenic gives rise to various biological signs on the body which can be useful for the diagnosis. It is important to find true biomarkers for the detection of arsenic poisoning. In view of its application in medicine and biology, studies on understanding the biological activity of arsenic have increased. In this review, we aim at summarizing the current state of knowledge of arsenic and the mechanism behind its toxicity including genotoxicity, oxidative insults, epigenomic changes, and alterations in cellular signaling.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Arsenic is a toxic element that ranks 20th in the earth’s crust, 14th in seawater, and 12th in the human body in terms of abundance [1,2,3,4]. This element can easily enter the ecological cycle through factors, such as dust, rainwater, open waters such as rivers and ponds, and groundwater [3, 5,6,7]. In general, its entrance to our environments in the biosphere is through geological and anthropogenic (human activities). It can also be transferred to soil and aquatic ecosystems through various biological resources (biogenic) rich in this element [3, 8, 9]. The volcanoes, hot springs, and geysers are natural sources of arsenic contamination [9, 10]. Mining, ore dressing, and smelting of non-ferrous metals; production of arsenic and its compounds; petroleum and chemical industries; pesticides, beer, table salt, tap water, paints, pigments, cosmetics, glass, and mirror manufacture; fungicides, insecticides, treated wood, and contaminated food; dyestuff and the tanning industry are major anthropogenic sources of its contamination [3, 11].
Initially, this element spreads with air, food chain, and both surface and ground waters, and then it enters the human body. All biodiversity, especially plants and animals, which constitute important structural components of an ecosystem, get exposed to the toxicity of this element. Especially the pollution in groundwater poses a serious risk for humans worldwide [3, 9, 12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. It is also utilized for mining processes. Miners are exposed to this metalloid because of their occupation [19]. People living near mining areas are also at risk due to mining-associated pollution [20, 21].
Some countries suffer from high levels of arsenic (>10 μg/L) in their tap water and soil that is considered a primary arsenic-linked risk factor for various health problems [20]. Approximately 150 million people in more than 70 countries are at risk of arsenic contamination; especially Argentina, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Chile, China, Ghana, Hungary, India, Mexico, Nepal, New Zealand, the Philippines, Taiwan, the USA, and Vietnam [11, 22, 23]. Recently, large amounts of arsenic poisoning have become a major socio-economic and health crisis, especially in South and Southeast Asian countries (affecting over 110 million people) [3, 24, 25]. A famous instance is Bangladesh mass poisoning, where 77 million people are face-to-face with arsenic chronically via highly arsenic polluted drinking waters [26, 27]. Health issues originating from arsenic may not be observed immediately; the consequences may appear 40 years after the exposure stops [28].
There are various paths for humans and animals to face the arsenic pollution; the primary route is heavily arsenic polluted drinking water, which is correlated with diverse health issues (Fig. 1), such as neural, physiological, reproductive, cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, and skin-associated disorders [29]. Exposure to arsenic toxicity in humans can also occur through ingestion, breathing, skin contact, and also genetically, although there is a much smaller source route than normal [30, 31]. It has been reported that the toxicity level on health effects is generally associated with the chemical arsenic type, the time of exposure, and the level of the dose. However, long-term exposure is the cause of many diseases and negative health problems [32, 33].
Arsenic acts on many events inside the human body such as the production of growth factors, the functionality of cell cycle checkpoint elements, apoptosis, DNA repairing, and DNA methylation, immune-related actions, and ROS balance. Changes triggered by arsenic significantly influence the progression of diseases like cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular disorders [34]. The mechanism of arsenic species functioning is complex and several factors affect the function of arsenicals in the cell covering valence state, the extent of arsenic methylation, electrostatic interplays with the active sites of prominent cellular elements, and pharmacokinetics [35]. Methyl ligation is accounted as the primary biotransformation route for inorganic arsenic species [36]. The metalloid is also known for its ability to trigger epigenetic abnormalities via dysregulation of microRNAs, in addition to alteration of global methylation [37] and histone modifications [38].
Arsenic has mutagenic, genotoxic, and carcinogenic characteristics [39, 40]. It affects DNA by creating DNA adducts and cross-links between DNA and proteins, which are then cut out from DNA and therefore translated into breaks on DNA [41]. The genotoxic potential of this metalloid is primarily based on its capability to create ROS [42]. When coupled with the reduction in the capacity of DNA repairs, arsenic triggers ROS formation leading to negative effects on DNA which creates observed genotoxic effects in humans [43, 44]. The carcinogenicity of arsenic originates from its mutagenicity and its ability to give rise to glucogenesis [45, 46].
In high doses, the metalloid can induce apoptosis. Molecular mechanisms behind arsenic-triggered apoptosis include depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane, formation of cytochrome-C, functioning of caspases, and fragmentation of genetic material [47]. On the way going to apoptosis, arsenic mediates activation of p38, JNK, and caspase-3 depending on the dose of arsenic the cell gets exposed to [48].
Arsenic Speciation
It is a naturally occurring element, widely distributed in the earth’s crust, showing metalloid characteristics, and occurs in many minerals either with other elements or as a pure element crystal [3, 11].
Arsenicals consist of two main groups, organic and inorganic arsenic compounds. The organic ones are predisposed to be far more toxic than inorganic ones [49]. Two predominant forms of arsenic are trivalent and pentavalent [50]. As (III) prevents pyruvate dehydrogenase function by connecting to the -SH groups on dihydrolipoamide; as a result, the cellular gain of acetyl coenzyme A (CoA) from pyruvate decreases, which is associated with the reduction in citric acid cycle function and biosynthesis of cellular ATP [51]. As (III) also prevents glucose intake, gluconeogenesis, fatty acid oxidation, following biosynthesis of acetyl CoA [52].
As (V) disrupts phosphorylation reactions [10] by mimicking and taking the places of phosphates in glycolysis and cellular respiration. In the reaction medium, As (V) connects to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) to create ADP-arsenate, which refers to the lack of the high-energy ATP phosphate linkages. Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation happens due to the lack of normal high-energy phosphate linkages [49].
The conversion of arsenates to arsenites is provided via glutathione arsenate reductase, while methylation of arsenates to trivalent arsenicals is succeeded with the help of S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) [36]. Monomethylarsonic acids (MMAs) and dimethylarsinic acids (DMAs) are methyl-ligated derivatives of arsenic. They do not experience a chemical or enzymatic process to be activated but differ from other arsenicals due to their ability to induce unwanted effects on naked DNA [53, 54]. Organic arsenic derivatives produced inside the human body involve monomethylarsonic acid (MMA (V)), monomethylarsonous acid (MMA (III)), dimethylarsinic acid (DMA (V)), dimethylarsinous acid (DMA (III)), and trimethylarsine oxide (TMAO), generated only when an organism is exposed to high doses [55]. Methyl ligation to arsenicals is carried out mainly via arsenic (III) methyltransferase (As3mt) [56]. TMAO is obtained from DMA (V) and MMA (V). DMA (V) is not an attractive target for human As3mt, which explains the rare formation of TMAO in humans. Despite this, DMA (V) and MMA (V) are attractive substrates of rodent As3mt [56]. The consensus about the toxic activity of distinct arsenic species states that arsenite is more toxic than arsenate. Even it is proposed that arsenate toxicity is sourced from translation of arsenate to arsenite [55]. MMA (V), DMA (V), and TMAO are slightly toxic at millimolar doses. As another organoarsenic, arsenobetaine is frequently found in marine products, but it does not show considerable toxicity [57]. Like arsenobetaine, arsenosugars located in foods too are not linked with remarkable toxicity [58]. Methylated thioarsenicals are noted as the arsenicals which exist as bounded with proteins in the form of pentavalent. These are the intermediates responsible for linking methylation and thiolation in arsenic species [59, 60].
Mutageniticity and Genotoxicity
Mutagenicity of this metalloid comes from its ability to interfere with the DNA repairing system [61]. Many genes which are significant for survival, promotion of cancer, apoptosis, signaling events, and growth can be influenced by arsenic-induced chromosomal abnormalities [62]. Arsenic is capable of preventing nucleotide excision as well as base excision repair and mismatch repair [63]. Its mediated blockage of DNA repair is predicted to give rise to a mutation on key tumor suppressor genes like tumor protein P53 (TP53), which increases the risk of bladder cancer [64]. Arsenic-sourced oxidative impacts on enzymes or proteins are also noted due to its high affinity for sulfhydryl groups causing inactivation of vital enzymes [65, 66]. These disrupt the repair system via either inhibition of ligation or decrease in the expression of DNA repair enzymes like DNA polymerase β [67].
Speciation of this element plays an important role in elucidating its genotoxic ability [68]. When compared to As (III), trivalent mono- and di-methylated forms are more aggressive in terms of genotoxicity and are able to block functions of enzymes [69] as As (III) does [49]. The trivalent methylated arsenic species are reported to be more active compared to the pentavalent forms, contributing mainly to the arsenic genotoxicity [70]. MMA (III) can also lead to electron leaks from the electron transport chain. As a result, activities of mitochondrial complexes I and III are disrupted and ROS, RNS, and some free radicals are generated [71].
Arsenic is capable of creating an oxidative environment inside the cell. Promotion of this oxidative status originates from arsenic-based Fenton type reaction or arsenic-related cellular antioxidative depletion capacity [72,73,74]. -SH groups on proteins are attractive elements for the binding of trivalent arsenic [75]. This element supports lipid peroxidation by negatively affecting the antioxidant system and amount of -SH groups [76]. ROS sourced from arsenic exposure is proposed to support carcinogenesis, followed by propagation [77]. In a study conducted on human hepatocellular carcinoma cells, it has been reported that there is an ability of arsenic trioxide to induce oxidative stress, caspase-3 activity, and breaks in DNA strands, thus inducing genotoxic DNA damage [78].
Carbonyl derivatives occur among products of protein oxidation. These derivatives are accepted as one of the general biomarkers of protein oxidation [79]. Due to arsenic-induced decrease in antioxidant enzymatic functions and arsenic-triggered increment in free radical formation, there is a rise in the number of protein carbonyls [80, 81]. As an adaptive response to arsenic-induced oxidative stress, a significant rise in activities of glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and catalase (CAT) is exhibited by exposed cells. However, in long-term exposures, cells display a reduction in GPx and CAT functions [82]. The reason being arsenic-mediated depletion of GSH, glutathione reductase (GR), and GPx, which cannot display their activities, ending up with a rise in the level of free radicals and thus oxidative stress [83].
Epigenomic Impacts
Arsenic is capable of acting on some cellular elements at the gene or RNA level during any addition to the protein level and the way the metalloid achieves this can include DNA methylation, microRNAs (miRNA), and histone modifications. It triggers transcriptional repression of hTERT which is the gene that encodes for a subunit of human reverse transcriptase [84, 85]. Consequently, the chromosomal impacts happen due to reduced telomerase function which occurs on chromosomes and can drive cells to genomic instability and cancer or cellular death [85, 86].
DNA Methylation
As3mt uses SAM as a methyl donor and its related reaction gives rise to ROS which contributes to cancer in several organs and some other pathologies [40]. SAM pool becomes smaller due to methylation reactions of arsenic; as such, its depletion can contribute to an altered gene methylation pattern [87]. Any utilization of SAM by arsenic methylator enzymes influences the epigenome [40]. DNA methyltransferase 3 (DNMT3A and B) and DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) are the main components of DNA methylation. When applied at low concentrations, the metalloid reduces the expression of the DNMTs, which again means a decrease in methylation capacity [38]. Among genes influenced by arsenic-induced epigenetic changes, p16, death-associated protein kinase (DAPK), and excision repair cross-complementation group 2 (ERCC2) are found. p16 and DAPK are two cellular tumor suppressor elements. They get exposed to the promoter hypermethylation, which “turns off” these two genes, while ERCC2 experiences promoter hypomethylation, via arsenic. By the arsenic-mediated hypomethylation of ERCC2, the interaction of ERCC2/Cdk-activating kinase complex (CAK) with transcription factor IIH (TFIIH) is blocked. Consequently, p53 phosphorylation is disrupted, which ends up with impairment of DNA damage recognition [43, 88].
MicroRNAs
In addition to protein level control, p53 is also controlled at the level of the gene. It is known that p53 expression is affected by the presence of miR200b. Arsenic induces downregulation of miR200b, blocking p53, and causes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition [10], thereby stimulating the suppression of p53 at a transcriptional level resulting in the transformation and discharge of growth factors, GM-CSF, TGF-alpha, TNF-alpha [29].
As opposite to miR200b, miR190 is dose-dependently upregulated via As (III). Overexpression of miR190 ultimately results in the constitutive activation of AKT and its downstream elements. miRNAs seem to be key elements of arsenic-sourced tumor progression [10]. Several studies have been conducted on arsenic-induced dysregulation of miRNAs at the cellular level. In the case of human lymphoblast, TK6 cells treated with 2 μmol/l of Na3AsO3 a downregulation of miR-210 and upregulation of miR-22, miR-34a, miR-221, miR-222 have been recorded. It has also been observed that by reversing the arsenic stress on the cells, the miRNA expression is reverted to normal [89]. Similarly, Ling et al. [90] have found an upregulation of miR-21, with subsequent activation of ERK/NF-κB signal pathway in arsenic-induced transformed human embryo lung fibroblast cells. They have also noted that treating the cells with anti-miR-21 reduced the miR-21 expression thus preventing the activation of the ERK/NF-κB pathway via the increase in the target protein of miR-21, Spryl. Arsenic-induced ERK/NF-κB pathway activation is mediated by miR-21, indicating its role in regulating the signaling pathways.
miRNAs are essential players regulating gene expression affecting cellular processes contributing to the disease development. Dysregulated miRNA expression has been observed in many diseases [91]. In cardiovascular diseases, several miRNAs function as mediators of pathogenic stress-related signaling pathways possibly leading to excessive extracellular matrix production and collagen deposition causing cardiac stress resulting in fibrosis. In cancers, many miRNAs function as oncogenes or tumor suppressors facilitating tumor growth, invasion, and angiogenesis. Moreover, an association between distinct miRNA profile and tumor development, progression, and treatment response has identified miRNAs as potential biomarkers for disease diagnosis and prognosis [91].
The study undertaken by Zeng and Zhag [92] gives an evidence that miR-155e5p regulates the NF-AT1-mediated immunological dysfunction involved in the pathogenesis and carcinogenesis of arsenic. A major finding of these researchers was Krt1 and Krt10, both being markers of hyperkeratosis caused by arsenic, and Krt6c is a potential biomarker that reflects the carcinogenesis of arsenic [92]. Hyperkeratosis is one of the most common skin lesions associated with chronic arsenic poisoning [93, 94]. It is considered a sign of aberrant cell proliferation and is likely a precursor skin lesion for squamous cell carcinoma [95]. In view of this, especially Krt6c can be used as a potential biomarker to reflect the carcinogenesis of arsenic [92].
Although miRNAs’ roles in carcinogenesis have been studied, there are several significant areas which should be investigated to understand the full range of influence. Specifically, while examining miRNA expression profiles in different cell lines and tissue types, similarities and differences are found in the expression levels of the miRNAs examined. Keeping in view the diversity of cancer genomes and phenotypes, analysis of genome-wide miRNA expression signatures aids in identifying key miRNAs and networks which have a significant impact on the progression of the disease [91]. According to Sun et al. [96] analysis of nearly 754 miRNAs has revealed that 56 are upregulated and 18 downregulated in the arsenic-exposed group compared to the control. In a West Bengal study conducted on the miRNA profiles on 12 arsenic-exposed individuals, 199 miRNAs were upregulated and 3 downregulated compared to the controls [97]. Both these epidemiological studies stress that the use of the whole genome profiling approach allows for the identification of large numbers of miRNAs which are potentially involved in disease pathogenesis [91]. Even with in vitro and especially in vivo studies, enough experiments have not been carried out on examining the effects of arsenic in the whole genome [98,99,100,101,102,103,104]. Shifting the focus from only a few miRNAs to a more thorough miRNA analysis is necessary, as miRNA expression profiles might enlighten mechanisms of action and improve our understanding of the complex biology of cancers and other diseases [91].
Histone Modifications
As (III) application can result in differential impacts on the methylation of H3 lysine [105]. It induces a rise in H3 lysine 9-dimethylation (H3K9me2) by increasing the level of histone-methyltransferase-G9a protein. In cancer, this rise is associated with the silencing of tumor suppressors at the transcription level. H3K9me2 is not the only histone modification affected by arsenic; an increase in H3 lysine 4-trimethylation (H3K4me3) and a reduction in H3 lysine 27-trimethylation (H3K27me3) are like this [38].
In vitro, altered histone H3 acetylation was reported in As (III) and MMA (III) transformed human urothelial malignancies. The changes observed were specific to arsenic, supporting the idea that arsenicals may contribute to tumor initiation via changes on the epigenome [106]. Another study conducted on human bladder epithelial cells has revealed that Monomethylarsonous acid (MMA III) and chronic As3 exposure reduce H4K16 acetylation leading to bladder carcinogenesis [107].
Although there are several reports for arsenic-associated changes in histone acetylation and methylation, only a few reports are connecting histone phosphorylation to arsenic-mediated carcinogenesis [38]. It has been suggested that phosphorylation at H3 is induced by exposure to arsenic and is potentially responsible for the increased expression of oncogenes c-Fos and c-Jun with subsequent activation of a proto-apoptotic factor CASPASE 10 [108, 109].
Cancer and Signaling Pathways
In light of the accumulated scientific data, it is proposed that arsenic-mediated carcinogenesis also originates from the imbalance of significant cellular signaling systems [77]. Exposure of human cells to arsenic induces the activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, ERK, JAK/STAT, and NRF2 pathway as shown in Fig. 2.
PI3K/AKT/mTOR
Several studies have revealed that, under chronic arsenic conditions, there is cellular proliferation, migration, invasion, and anchorage-independency. These endpoints are highly associated with AKT and PI3K functions [110, 111]. PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is commonly disrupted in cancers. This pathway is critical for cellular survival, physiology, and pathology [77]; it can be influenced by mutations in DNA, hepatitis C virus, toxic chemicals involving some non-essential metals/metalloids, and some cellular molecules like interleukin-6 and free fatty acids [112].
As non-essential metals/metalloids, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury trigger malignancy through the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling [77]. There is much evidence available proposing that arsenic can do this because of activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway to promote proliferation in normal cells, but it shows opposite impacts on cancerous cells. The metalloid drives diverse cancer cells to apoptotic cell death where the efficiency of the operation changes with changing cancer types [77]. As (III) can lead to activation of PI3K/AKT pathway via JNK/ STAT3 signaling induced AKT and via suppression PTEN, a protein blocking PI3K/AKT signaling [10]. During the malignant transformation of stem cells, arsenite has also been shown to suppress the expression of PTEN [113]. In human bronchial epithelial (HBE) cells, As (III) can cause a release of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by activating AKT. VEGF is known for its ability to stimulate cell migration following distinct procedures [114]. However, differently from the aforementioned arsenicals, arsenic disulfide has been found to block AKT/mTOR signaling, in addition to autophagy and apoptotic cell death, in several osteosarcoma cell lines [115].
EGFR
A probable scenario for arsenic-triggered activation of PI3K/AKT pathway involves stimulation of upstream molecules like epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which is demonstrated to trigger abnormal epithelial cell proliferation [77]. Under normal conditions, EGFR activity is dependent on epidermal growth factor (EGF) binding. Activated EGRF ultimately targets activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, which are known for their importance in stress responses, inflammatory events, and growth. Arsenic can render c-Src functional, and activated c-Src renders EGFR functional in a ligand-independent manner; consequently, EGFR becomes constitutively active [116]. Later, it activates Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling. Functioning of Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling ends up with cellular proliferation, migration, and survival [10]. In the case of hepatocellular carcinoma, cells face arsenic overexpress EGFR [117]. Furthermore, the metalloid can render elements of the EGFR pathway functional in lung epithelial cells through ROS. These elements include Ras, Raf, MEK, and ERK [118, 119]. A very recent study has shown how PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy is implicated in arsenic-induced apoptosis of human hepatic cells via activation of ERK signaling cascade [120].
Nrf2
Nrf2 is a transcription factor that guards the cell against oxidative and electrophilic insults. Nrf2 does its job by connecting with small Maf proteins, together with giving rise to transcription of genes having antioxidant response element (ARE) as their regulatory element [121, 122]. NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), heme oxygenase 1 (HMOX1), glutamate-cysteine ligase (GCL), and glutathione S transferases (GSTs) are listed under the category of Nrf2-mediated genes [123]. One of how the cell controls the availability of Nrf2 is immobilization via means of Keap1 followed by ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis [121]. In normal cells and cells not fully transformed to malignant form, Nrf2 plays the protective role [124]. Despite this, the constitutive activity of Nrf2 is displayed by diverse cancer cells, providing a growth advantage to fully malignant cells [123, 125]. The growth advantage originates from chemoresistance and augmented cell growth. Chemoresistance sourced from Nrf2 is based on an Nrf2-induced rise in the level of drug-processing elements [124]. Constitutively functional Nrf2 results in cell proliferation via driving glucose and glutamine to biosynthesis and by acting on Pentose Phosphate Pathway [126].
Keap1, as a part of a Cullin-3 E3 ligase, holds Nrf2 for ubiquitination, under non-oxidative and non-electrophilic conditions. Ubiquitin-ligated Nrf2 is destined to get degraded via the 26S proteasome system. Under oxidative and electrophilic conditions, Keap1 detects oxidative factors with the help of its cysteine residues. Once these factors are detected, the interaction between Nrf2 and Keap1 is affected, ubiquitin ligation to Nrf2 fails, the non-ubiquitylated Nrf2 gets stabilized as well as activated, and Nrf2 complexes with small Maf proteins function as a transcription machine for various genes [127].
Both Nrf2 and autophagy display contradictory functions in cancer when compared to normal cells. Cross talk between these two cellular systems occurs by an interaction of p62 with Keap1 [128]. p62 is one of the proteins of autophagic membrane providing substrate specificity to autophagic degradation by clasping ubiquitin-ligated proteins, fated to experience autophagic degradation. The p62 provides stability to the autophagic membrane and assists in surrounding the surface of incoming material [129]. However, when p62 recognizes Keap1, it can sequester it into aggregates of p62 or an autophagic vesicle; but Keap1 can get exposed to autophagic proteolysis inside the autophagosome. This way p62 indirectly renders Nrf2 free, by prevention of Keap1-modulated ubiquitin ligation, to enter the nucleus and causes transcription of ARE genes [128]. The p62 is critically significant for Keap1 turnover because of its role in the degradation of Keap1 [130]. By promoting Keap1 turnover, p62 also protects the integrity of the Nrf2/Keap1 mechanism [131]. Disruption of autophagic function ends up with long-term functional Nrf2, in a p62-related mean [128]. It is important to note that p62 is one of the downstream target genes of Nrf2, and by this downstream relation a positive feedback loop is generated [132].
Trivalent arsenic and trivalent monomethyl arsenic are capable of activating Nrf2. They achieve this by enhancing the connection of Keap1 and Cullin-3 (Cul-3) which impairs dynamic association/dissociation operation happening between Keap1-Cul3. Impairment of Keap1-Cul3 dynamics results in a reduction in ubiquitin ligation to Nrf2, meaning stabilization and activation of Nrf2 [133].
Arsenite-triggered stress-activated p300/CB has been found to provide acetyl ligation to Nrf2. This acetylation positively modulates the binding of Nrf2 to its target region on the DNA [134]. Sodium arsenite triggers activation of Nrf2, independently from cysteines of Keap1, in a way that leads to a decrease in ubiquitin ligation to Nrf2 [135], while arsenic makes Nrf2 functional in p62 by prevention of autophagic flux. After exposure to arsenic, autophagic vesicles arise in amount, and p62, LC3, and Keap1 co-localize to promote constitutive activation of Nrf2 [125, 136]. Sodium arsenite can transform HBE cells by decreasing the amount of Nrf2 and thus its transcriptional targets, NQO1, and HO-1 proteins. In the absence of these proteins, cells are driven into malignant proliferation [137].
Others
Arsenic severely affects some of the signaling molecules such as NO, S-nitrosothiols, AP-1, NFkappaB, and p53. Its mediated damages on these molecules originate from their redox-sensitive character. Additionally, p21 ras is also affected by arsenic via metal-triggered signaling events. Cellular stress induced by the metalloid is sensed with the help of MAPK, JNK, and p38. These three are known to activate a group of genes, called immediate early genes, c-fos, c-jun, and EGR-1, which provide biosynthesis of the heat shock proteins (HSP) and cell transformation [29].
Inflammation and Immune System
Arsenic-related immune issues include weakened immune surveillance system and increased level of infection, autoimmune problems, cancer, and other immune-controlled problems [138]. The recent findings have revealed that this metalloid hinders macrophage activity and aggravates lipopolysaccharide-triggered inflammation, managed by macrophages and monocytes [139]. Inflammation is a famous hallmark for cancer progression. It protects tissues after injury. However, it also gives rise to several diseases involving cancers [140]. As urothelial cells face arsenic, there is a release of inflammatory markers like IL-8, TNF-α, and TGF-β [141]. Chronic low-level arsenic (11–50 μg/L) is demonstrated to promote systemic inflammation. The underlying mechanism is based on the upregulation of pro-inflammatory mediators such as TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, and CRP [142]. Long-term arsenic exposure can impair immune responses against inflammation [143].
There is evidence that inorganic arsenic can repress the immune system to some degree, but tumors related to arsenic, especially the skin, lung, and bladder, do not appear in individuals who are immune-suppressed [38]. Immuno-suppressive features of the metalloid are characterized by a decrease in CD4+ level in epidermal keratinocytes [36]. Recently, the role of peptidyl arginine deiminase (PAD2)–induced inflammasome signaling in sodium arsenic–exposed lungs has been investigated showing increased reactivity upon exposure to the metals in mice [144].
Symptoms of As Poisoning
Arsenic can be absorbed by ingestion, inhalation, and penetration via skin, as well as contact with mucous membranes and toxicokinetics depends on the type as well as time of exposure, the physicochemical characteristics of the compound (pKa and solubility), the pathway, and the affected biological species. Nearly 70–90% of the inorganic arsenic is easily absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract after its ingestion, followed by its distribution through the bloodstream to different organs such as the liver, kidneys, lungs, bladder, and secondarily to muscle/nerve tissue. During the absorption and distribution phase, the greatest accumulation of inorganic arsenic is found in the liver and subsequent excretion takes place mainly through urination [145, 146].
The human body contains approximately 0.08–0.02 mg As/kg, mainly concentrated in the liver, kidneys, lungs, bones, and hair. The excessive or prolonged exposure to its compounds results in severe acute or chronic toxicity leading to a range of medical complications termed “Arsenicosis” [147, 148]. In acute As exposures, a metallic taste occurs in the mouth with a slight odor of garlic in the breath and dysphasia, followed by nausea, vomiting, burning in the stomach and esophagus, abdominal pain, and diarrhea. In addition to these, cyanosis, hypoxic encephalopathy, convulsions, acute tubular necrosis, cardiovascular, and respiratory symptoms such as hypotension, pulmonary edema, and heart failure can occur. Death follows in the first few hours from shock or some days later from acute renal or liver failure [148, 149]. Prolonged As poisoning has wide range of clinical features and leads to multisystemic diseases. In chronic As poisoning, the element accumulates in the liver, kidneys, heart, and lungs, muscle tissues, nervous system, gastrointestinal tract, spleen, and other tissues containing keratin. Nearly 2 weeks following As ingestion, deposition starts in the hair and nails, and the highest concentration is observed in the kidneys and liver [148, 149]. It causes myocardial injury, cardiac arrhythmias, and cardiomyopathy by reducing the activity of antioxidant enzymes of the heart, namely superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione S-transferase, glutathione reductase, and glutathione peroxidase [148, 150]. Toxic polyneuropathy and peripheral neuropathy often occur. Tetraplegia or paresis develops with the prevalence of lesions of peroneal muscles. In rare cases, injuries of the individual cranial nerves: facial, trigeminal, vagus, and sublingual ones have also been reported. Toxic polyneuropathy is usually accompanied by pronounced vegetative trophic disorders: hyperkeratosis, over-exfoliation of the skin on the extremities, hair loss, ulcerative processes on the gums, and vasomotor disorders [148]. The development of clinical symptoms of toxic polyneuropathy initially occurs with symptoms of irritation of the nerve trunks. This leads to sharp pains in the extremities, accompanied by the phenomena of hyperpathia, ataxia, and a marked decrease in vibrational sensitivity. The behavioral changes, obfuscation, and memory loss have also been reported, together with psychoses due to As poisoning [49, 148, 151].
Both inorganic and organic As compounds pass the human placenta in late pregnancy, and accumulate in the fetus. The published work on the effects of As in high doses indicate a risk for pregnancy [148], but the effects in small doses have also been recorded [152]. As-containing compounds cause an abnormal pregnancy outcome in experimental animals at sufficiently high levels, including miscarriages, stillbirths, and infant deaths in communities using drinking water with As concentrations above 50 ppb (μg/L) [148, 153]. Epidemiological studies of areas with high levels of As in drinking waters indicate an association between in utero As exposure and the development of adult diseases cited above together with diabetes [148, 154,155,156,157].
Urinary As concentration is used to quantify and monitor its recent poisoning [148]. Analyses of blood, hair, and fingernails samples are also good indicators of exposure. Because of the short half-life of As in blood, hematological estimation is useful in particular in the diagnosis of acute intoxication [148]. Inorganic As incorporates into hair and fingernails due to its affinity to the sulfhydryl groups in keratin. The metal deposition requires nearly 2 weeks after exposition to appear. In chronic poisonings, As levels found in hair samples are in the range of 0.1–0.5 mg/kg, but in acute poisonings, concentrations reach values between 1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg [148]. Another common clinical manifestation of chronic As exposure is the appearance of Mee’s lines in the nails. Hair and nail tests are particularly useful to determine the level of As exposure in the previous 6–12 months; but long hair is needed to define the history associated with exposure [148]. Other key characteristic features are skin lesions, melanosis, keratosis, and pigmentation, often used for diagnosing chronic As poisoning since they usually develop from 5 to 10 years after initial exposure [148].
Arsenic concentration in the blood is not taken into consideration as a trustable biomarker of its exposure whilst urinary concentration is commonly accepted as highly dependable because arsenic is predominantly excreted as a part of urine [49]. It changes heme metabolism; as a result, large amounts of both total porphyrin and coproporphyrin III isomer occur in the urine [158], as the amount of urinary methylated arsenic increases, the risk of skin and bladder cancer increases in parallel [159, 160].
Skin alterations are counted as major indicators of chronic arsenic toxicity [161, 162]. Among the organs, kidneys are most sensitive towards arsenic toxicity [163], and capillaries, tubules, and glomeruli are the major sites associated with renal toxicity [36]. The scope of arsenic poisoning alters with factors like exposed concentration, age, and individual susceptibility [49]. In males, the conversion of MMA to DMA is lower in rate as compared to the females. It is therefore proposed that “male individuals may be more susceptible to arsenic toxicity” [36]. Metallothioneins (MTs) are short polypeptides having a high binding affinity towards heavy metals because of their -SH-rich nature. MTs buffer heavy metals in the serum [75, 164]. Production of MTs can be stimulated in response to trivalent arsenic [75], and HSP production is also stimulated because of arsenic exposure [165, 166].
Conclusions
As is a toxic heavy metal, interrupting in numerous signal pathways. It is renowned for its toxicity, with varying effects on the body and cells in people who are exposed to it, usually through contaminated drinking waters. The mechanism behind the toxicity includes many events like genotoxicity, oxidative attacks, epigenomic changes, and changes in cellular signals [167,168,169]. It also leads to the abnormalities in the inflammatory mechanisms and the immune system, with further adverse effects in the body. As poisoning causes a variety of biological symptoms in the body, these can be useful for diagnosis. Although the extent of arsenic toxicity varies with various factors such as exposure, age, and individual sensitivity, its concentration in urine is generally accepted as the most reliable biomarker. It was emphasized that as the amount of methylated arsenic in urine increases, the risk of skin and bladder cancer may increase. In addition to these, the skin changes are also counted as major indicators of chronic arsenic toxicity. This review presents an overview of the latest information from the contributions towards the facilitation of detection of reliable biological markers in the treatment of diseases, especially cancer, during arsenic exposure and with a note on the fact related to the understanding of the mechanisms of its toxicity.
References
Mandal BK, Suzuki KT (2002) Arsenic round the world: a review. Talanta 58:201e235
Flora SJS (2015) Arsenic: chemistry, occurrence, and exposure. In: Flora SJS (ed) Handbook of arsenic toxicology. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 1–49
Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Hakeem KR, Ozturk M, Fujita M (2015) Arsenic toxicity in plants and possible remediation. In: Hakeem KR, Sabir M, Ozturk M, Mermut A (eds) Soil remediation and plants: prospects and challenges. Academic Press, Elsevier, New York, pp 433–501
Huq ME, Fahad S, Shao Z, Sarven MS, Khan IA, Alam M, Saeed M, Ullah H, Adnan M, Saud S, Cheng Q, Ali S, Wahid F, Zamin M, Raza MA, Saeed B, Riaz M, Khan WU (2020) Arsenic in a groundwater environment in Bangladesh: occurrence and mobilization. J Environ Manag 262:110318
Chowdhury MTA, Deacon CM, Steel E, Huq SI, Paton GI, Price AH, Williams PN, Meharg AA, Norton GJ (2018) Physiographical variability in arsenic dynamics in Bangladeshi soils. Sci Total Environ 612:1365–1372
Cui JL, Zhao YP, Li JS, Beiyuan JZ, Tsang DC, Poon CS, Chan T-S, Wang W-X, Li XD (2018) Speciation, mobilization, and bioaccessibility of arsenic in geogenic soil profile from Hong Kong. Environ Pollut 232:375–384
Minatel BC, Sage AP, Anderson C, Hubaux R, Marshall EA, Lam WL, Martinez VD (2018) Environmental arsenic exposure: from genetic susceptibility to pathogenesis. Environ Int 112:183–197
Mahimairaja S, Bolan NS, Adriano DC, Robinson B (2005) Arsenic contamination and its risk management in complex environmental settings. Adv Agron 86:1–82
Hussain MM, Wang J, Bibi I, Shahid M, Niazi NK, Iqbal J, Mian IA, Shaheen SS, Bashir S, Shah NS, Hina K, Rinklebe J (2020) Arsenic speciation and biotransformation pathways in the aquatic ecosystem: the significance of algae. J Hazard Mater 403:124027
Soza-Ried C, Bustamante E, Caglevic C, Rolfo C, Sirera R, Marsiglia H (2019) Oncogenic role of arsenic exposure in lung cancer: a forgotten risk factor. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 139:128–133
Hasanuzzaman M, Fujita M (2012) Heavy metals in the environment: current status, toxic effects on plants and possible phytoremediation. In: Anjum NA, Pereira MA, Ahmad I, Duarte AC, Umar S, Khan NA (eds) Phytotechnologies: remediation of environmental contaminants. Taylor and Francis/CRC Press, USA, pp 7–73
Çalışkan MB, Pala A (2009) Arsenic contamination in drinking water: an assessment for Turkey. Pamukkale Universitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 15:69–79
Ahmed MK, Baki MA, Kundu GK, Islam MS, Islam MM, Hossain MM (2016) Human health risks from heavy metals in fish of Buriganga river, Bangladesh. SpringerPlus 5(1):1–12
Sönmez O, Turan V, Kaya C (2016) The effects of sulfur, cattle, and poultry manure addition on soil phosphorus. Turk J Agric For 40(4):536–541
Turan V, Khan SA, Iqbal M, Ramzani PMA, Fatima M (2018) Promoting the productivity and quality of brinjal aligned with heavy metals immobilization in a wastewater irrigated heavy metal polluted soil with biochar and chitosan. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 161:409–419
Turan V, Ramzani PMA, Ali Q, Abbas F, Iqbal M, Irum A, Khan WUD (2018) Alleviation of nickel toxicity and an improvement in zinc bioavailability in sunflower seed with chitosan and biochar application in pH adjusted nickel contaminated soil. Arch Agron Soil Sci 64(8):1053–1067
Zia Z, Bakhat HF, Saqib ZA, Shah GM, Fahad S, Ashraf MR, Hammad HM, Naseem W, Shahid M (2017) Effect of water management and silicon on germination, growth, phosphorus and arsenic uptake in rice. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 144:11–18
Zhu N, Qiao J, Yan T (2019) Arsenic immobilization through regulated ferrolysis in paddy field amendment with bismuth impregnated biochar. Sci Total Environ 648:993–1001
Humans IWG on the E of CR to, Organization WH, & Cancer, IA for R on (2004) Some drinking-water disinfectants and contaminants, including arsenic. IARC, 2004
Ferreccio C, Sancha AM (2006) Arsenic exposure and its impact on health in Chile. J Health Popul Nutr:164–175
Queirolo F, Stegen S, Restovic M, Paz M, Ostapczuk P, Schwuger MJ, Munoz L (2000) Total arsenic, lead, and cadmium levels in vegetables cultivated at the Andean villages of northern Chile. Sci Total Environ 255(1-3):75–84
Das HK, Mitra AK, Sengupta PK, Hossain A, Islam F, Rabbani GH (2004) Arsenic concentrations in rice, vegetables, and fish in Bangladesh: a preliminary study. Environ Int 30(3):383–387
Brammer H, Ravenscroft P (2009) Arsenic in groundwater: a threat to sustainable agriculture in South and South-east Asia. Environ Int 35(3):647–654
Garshick M, Wu F, Demmer R, Parvez F, Ahmed A, Eunus M, Hasan R, Nahar J, Shaheen I, Sarwar G, Dasverieux M, Ahsan H, Chen Y (2017) The association between socioeconomic status and subclinical atherosclerosis in a rural Bangladesh population. Prev Med 102:6–11
Bhattacharjee S, Saha B, Saha B, Uddin MS, Panna CH, Bhattacharya P, Saha R (2019) Groundwater governance in Bangladesh: established practices and recent trends. Groundw Sustain Dev 8:69–81
Argos M, Kalra T, Rathouz PJ, Chen Y, Pierce B, Parvez F, Islam T, Ahmed A, Rakibuz-Zaman M, Hasan R, Sarwar G, Slavkovich V, Geen A, Graziano J, Ahsan H (2010) Arsenic exposure from drinking water, and all-cause and chronic-disease mortalities in Bangladesh (HEALS): a prospective cohort study. Lancet 376(9737):252–258
Martinez VD, Vucic EA, Lam S, Lam WL (2012) Arsenic and lung cancer in never-smokers: lessons from Chile. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 185(10):1131–1132
Steinmaus CM, Ferreccio C, Romo JA, Yuan Y, Cortes S, Marshall G, Moore LE, Balmes JR, Liaw J, Golden T, Smith AH (2013) Drinking water arsenic in northern Chile: high cancer risks 40 years after exposure cessation. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers 22(4):623–630
Mandal P (2017) Molecular insight of arsenic-induced carcinogenesis and its prevention. Naunyn Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 390(5):443–455
Khan NI, Owens G, Bruce D, Naidu R (2009) Human arsenic exposure and risk assessment at the landscape level: a review. Environ Geochem Health 31(1):143
Ourshalimian S, Naser AM, Rahman M, Doza S, Stowell J, Narayan KV, Shamsudduha M, Gribble MO (2019) Arsenic and fasting blood glucose in the context of other drinking water chemicals: a cross-sectional study in Bangladesh. Environ Res 172:249–257
Mateen FJ, Grau-Perez M, Pollak JS, Moon KA, Howard BV, Umans JG, Best LG, Francesconi KA, Goessler W, Crainiceanu C, Navas-Acien A (2017) Chronic arsenic exposure and risk of carotid artery disease: the Strong Heart Study. Environ Res 157:127–134
Islam MS, Ahmed MK, Habibullah-Al-Mamun M, Eaton DW (2017) Arsenic in the food chain and assessment of population health risks in Bangladesh. Environment Systems and Decisions 37(3):344–352
Flora SJ (2011) Arsenic-induced oxidative stress and its reversibility. Free Radic Biol Med 51(2):257–281
Sinha D, Biswas J, Bishayee A (2013) Nrf2-mediated redox signaling in arsenic carcinogenesis: a review. Arch Toxicol 87(2):383–396
Tchounwou PB, Yedjou CG, Udensi UK, Pacurari M, Stevens JJ, Patlolla AK, Noubissi F, Kumar S (2019) State of the science review of the health effects of inorganic arsenic: perspectives for future research. Environ Toxicol 34(2):188–202
Bjørklund G, Aaseth J, Chirumbolo S, Urbina MA, Uddin R (2018) Effects of arsenic toxicity beyond epigenetic modifications. Environ Geochem Health 40(3):955–965
Zhou Q, Xi S (2018) A review on arsenic carcinogenesis: epidemiology, metabolism, genotoxicity and epigenetic changes. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 99:78–88
Maiti S, Chattopadhyay S, Deb B, Samanta T, Maji G, Pan B, Ghosh A, Ghosh D (2012) Antioxidant and metabolic impairment result in DNA damage in arsenic-exposed individuals with severe dermatological manifestations in Eastern India. Environ Toxicol 27(6):342–350
Roy JS, Chatterjee D, Das N, Giri AK (2018) Substantial evidences indicate that inorganic arsenic is a genotoxic carcinogen: a review. Toxicological Research 34(4):311–324
Huang HB, Chen GW, Wang CJ, Lin YY, Liou SH, Lai CH, Wang SL (2013) Exposure to heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and DNA damage in taiwanese traffic conductors. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers 22(1):102–108
Hei TK, Liu SX, Waldren C (1998) Mutagenicity of arsenic in mammalian cells: role of reactive oxygen species. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95(14):8103–8107
Paul S, Banerjee N, Chatterjee A, Sau TJ, Das JK, Mishra PK, Chakrabarti P, Bandyopadhyay A, Giri AK (2014) Arsenic-induced promoter hypomethylation and over-expression of ERCC2 reduces DNA repair capacity in humans by non-disjunction of the ERCC2-Cdk7 complex. Metallomics 6(4):864–873
Sun HJ, Rathinasabapathi B, Wu B, Luo J, Pu LP, Ma LQ (2014) Arsenic and selenium toxicity and their interactive effects in humans. Environ Int 69:148–158
Samuel TA, Akande IS, Ebuehi OA (2011) Protective role of the methanolic extract of Icacina trichantha on sodium arsenite induced genotoxicity and hepatotoxicity. Nigerian Quarterly Journal of Hospital Medicine 21(4):262–266
Singh AP, Goel RK, Kaur T (2011) Mechanisms pertaining to arsenic toxicity. Toxicol Int 18(2):87
Kim YJ, Chung JY, Lee SG, Kim JY, Park JE, Kim WR, Joo BS, Han SH, Yoo KS, Yoo YH, Kim JM (2011) Arsenic trioxide-induced apoptosis in TM4 Sertoli cells: the potential involvement of p21 expression and p53 phosphorylation. Toxicology 285(3):142–151
Wang Y, Zhang Y, Yang L, Cai B, Li J, Zhou Y, Yin L, Yang L, Yang B, Lu Y (2011) Arsenic trioxide induces the apoptosis of human breast cancer MCF-7 cells through activation of caspase-3 and inhibition of HERG channels. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 2(3):481–486
Jomova K, Jenisova Z, Feszterova M, Baros S, Liska J, Hudecova D, Rhodes CJ, Valko M (2011) Arsenic: toxicity, oxidative stress and human disease. J Appl Toxicol 31(2):95–107
Wysocki R, Tamás MJ (2011) Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model organism for elucidating arsenic tolerance mechanisms. In: Banfalvi G (ed) Cellular Effects of Heavy Metals. Springer, p 87-112
Bergquist ER, Fischer RJ, Sugden KD, Martin BD (2009) Inhibition by methylated organoarsenicals of the respiratory 2-oxo-acid dehydrogenases. J Organomet Chem 694(6):973–980
Miller WH, Schipper HM, Lee JS, Singer J, Waxman S (2002) Mechanisms of action of arsenic trioxide. Cancer Res 62(14):3893–3903
Pierce BL, Kibriya MG, Tong L, Jasmine F, Argos M, Roy S, Paul-Brutus R, Rahaman R, Rakibuz-Zaman M, Parvez F, Ahmed A, Quasem I, Hore SK, Alam S, Islam T, Slavkovich V, Gamble MV, Yunus MD, Rahman M, Baron JA, Graziano JH, Ahsan H (2012) Genome-wide association study identifies chromosome 10q24. 32 variants associated with arsenic metabolism and toxicity phenotypes in Bangladesh. PLoS Genet 8(2):e1002522
Yager JW, Gentry PR, Thomas RS, Pluta L, Efremenko A, Black M, Arnold LL, McKim JM, Wilga P, Gill G, Choe K-Y, Clewell HJ (2013) Evaluation of gene expression changes in human primary uroepithelial cells following 24-Hr exposures to inorganic arsenic and its methylated metabolites. Environ Mol Mutagen 54(2):82–98
Cohen SM, Chowdhury A, Arnold LL (2016) Inorganic arsenic: a non-genotoxic carcinogen. J Environ Sci 49:28–37
Thomas DJ (2007) Molecular processes in cellular arsenic metabolism. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 222(3):365–373
Dodmane PR, Arnold LL, Kakiuchi-Kiyota S, Qiu F, Liu X, Rennard SI, Cohen SM (2013) Cytotoxicity and gene expression changes induced by inorganic and organic trivalent arsenicals in human cells. Toxicology 312:18–29
Aylward LL, Ramasamy S, Hays SM, Schoeny R, Kirman CR (2014) Evaluation of urinary speciated arsenic in NHANES: issues in interpretation in the context of potential inorganic arsenic exposure. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 69(1):49–54
Sun Y, Liu G, Cai Y (2016) Thiolated arsenicals in arsenic metabolism: occurrence, formation, and biological implications. J Environ Sci 49:59–73
Fan C, Liu G, Long Y, Rosen B, Cai Y (2018) Thiolation in arsenic metabolism: a chemical perspective. Metallomics 10(10):1368–1382
Litwin I, Bocer T, Dziadkowiec D, Wysocki R (2013) Oxidative stress and replication-independent DNA breakage induced by arsenic in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 9(7):e1003640
Adetutu A, Oyewo EB, Adesokan AA (2013) Protective effects of Vernonia amygdalina against sodium arsenite-induced genotoxicity in rat. Pharm Res 5(3):207
Hossain MB, Vahter M, Concha G, Broberg K (2012) Environmental arsenic exposure and DNA methylation of the tumor suppressor gene p16 and the DNA repair gene MLH1: effect of arsenic metabolism and genotype. Metallomics 4(11):1167–1175
Kelsey KT, Hirao T, Hirao S, Devi-Ashok T, Nelson HH, Andrew A, Colt J, Baris D, Morris JS, Schned A, Karagas M (2005) TP53 alterations and patterns of carcinogen exposure in a US population-based study of bladder cancer. Int J Cancer 117(3):370–375
Hughes MF, Beck BD, Chen Y, Lewis AS, Thomas DJ (2011) Arsenic exposure and toxicology: a historical perspective. Toxicol Sci 123(2):305–332
Wang YC, Chaung RH, Tung LC (2004) Comparison of the cytotoxicity induced by different exposure to sodium arsenite in two fish cell lines. Aquat Toxicol 69(1):67–79
Sinha D, Roy M (2011) Antagonistic role of tea against sodium arsenite-induced oxidative DNA damage and inhibition of DNA repair in Swiss albino mice. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 30(4):311–322
Colognato R, Coppede F, Ponti J, Sabbioni E, Migliore L (2007) Genotoxicity induced by arsenic compounds in peripheral human lymphocytes analysed by cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay. Mutagenesis 22(4):255–261
Dopp E, Von Recklinghausen U, Diaz-Bone R, Hirner AV, Rettenmeier AW (2010) Cellular uptake, subcellular distribution and toxicity of arsenic compounds in methylating and non-methylating cells. Environ Res 110(5):435–442
Kligerman AD, Doerr CL, Tennant AH, Harrington-Brock K, Allen JW, Winkfield E, Poorman-Allen P, Kundu B, Funasaka K, Roop BC, Mass MJ, DeMarini DM (2003) Methylated trivalent arsenicals as candidate ultimate genotoxic forms of arsenic: induction of chromosomal mutations but not gene mutations. Environ Mol Mutagen 42(3):192–205
Hubaux R, Becker-Santos DD, Enfield KS, Rowbotham D, Lam S, Lam WL, Martinez VD (2013) Molecular features in arsenic-induced lung tumors. Mol Cancer 12(1):1–11
Gupta DK, Inouhe M, Rodríguez-Serrano M, Romero-Puertas MC, Sandalio LM (2013) Oxidative stress and arsenic toxicity: role of NADPH oxidases. Chemosphere 90(6):1987–1996
Tandon N, Roy M, Roy S, Gupta N (2012) Protective effect of Psidium guajava in arsenic-induced oxidative stress and cytological damage in rats. Toxicol Int 19(3):245
Vattanasit U, Navasumrit P, Khadka MB, Kanitwithayanun J, Promvijit J, Autrup H, Ruchirawat M (2014) Oxidative DNA damage and inflammatory responses in cultured human cells and in humans exposed to traffic-related particles. Int J Hyg Environ Health 217(1):23–33
Ganger R, Garla R, Mohanty BP, Bansal MP, Garg ML (2016) Protective effects of zinc against acute arsenic toxicity by regulating antioxidant defense system and cumulative metallothionein expression. Biol Trace Elem Res 169(2):218–229
Patel HV, Kalia K (2013) Role of hepatic and pancreatic oxidative stress in arsenic induced diabetic condition in Wistar rats. J Environ Biol 34(2):231–236
Chen QY, Costa M (2018) PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway and the biphasic effect of arsenic in carcinogenesis. Mol Pharmacol 94(1):784–792
Saud Alarifi DA, Alkahtani S, Siddiqui MA, Ali BA (2013) Arsenic trioxide-mediated oxidative stress and genotoxicity in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. OncoTargets and Therapy 6:75
Tokar EJ, Kojima C, Waalkes MP (2014) Methylarsonous acid causes oxidative DNA damage in cells independent of the ability to biomethylate inorganic arsenic. Arch Toxicol 88(2):249–261
Rana T, Bera AK, Bhattacharya D, Das S, Pan D, Das SK (2015) Characterization of arsenic-induced cytotoxicity in liver with stress in erythrocytes and its reversibility with Pleurotus florida lectin. Toxicol Ind Health 31(2):108–122
Vélez-Alavez M, Labrada-Martagón V, Méndez-Rodriguez LC, Galván-Magaña F, Zenteno-Savín T (2013) Oxidative stress indicators and trace element concentrations in tissues of mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchus). Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 165(4):508–514
Bhattacharya S, Haldar PK (2013) Trichosanthes dioica root alleviates arsenic induced myocardial toxicity in rats. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 32(3):251–261
Ilyas S, Rehman A (2015) Oxidative stress, glutathione level and antioxidant response to heavy metals in multi-resistant pathogen, Candida tropicalis. Environ Monit Assess 187(1):1–7
Coelho P, García-Lestón J, Costa S, Costa C, Silva S, Dall’Armi V, Zoffoli R, Bonassi S, Lima JP, Gaspar JF, Pásaro E, Laffon B, Teixeira JP (2013) Genotoxic effect of exposure to metal (loid)s. A molecular epidemiology survey of populations living and working in Panasqueira mine area, Portugal. Environ Int 60:163–170
Wnek SM, Kuhlman CL, Camarillo JM, Medeiros MK, Liu KJ, Lau SS, Gandolfi AJ (2011) Interdependent genotoxic mechanisms of monomethylarsonous acid: role of ROS-induced DNA damage and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 inhibition in the malignant transformation of urothelial cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 257(1):1–13
Jiang X, Chen C, Zhao W, Zhang Z (2013) Sodium arsenite and arsenic trioxide differently affect the oxidative stress, genotoxicity and apoptosis in A549 cells: an implication for the paradoxical mechanism. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 36(3):891–902
Paul S, Bhattacharjee P, Giri AK (2017) Arsenic toxicity and epimutagenecity: the new LINEage. Biometals 30(4):505–515
Banerjee M, Banerjee N, Bhattacharjee P, Mondal D, Lythgoe PR, Martínez M, Pan J, Polya DA, Giri AK (2013) High arsenic in rice is associated with elevated genotoxic effects in humans. Sci Rep 3(1):1–8
Marsit CJ, Eddy K, Kelsey KT (2006) MicroRNA responses to cellular stress. Cancer Res 66(22):10843–10848
Ling M, Li Y, Xu Y, Pang Y, Shen L, Jiang R, Zhao Y, Yang X, Zhang J, Zhou J, Wang X, Liu Q (2012) Regulation of miRNA-21 by reactive oxygen species-activated ERK/NF-κB in arsenite-induced cell transformation. Free Radic Biol Med 52(9):1508–1518
Cardoso APF, Udoh KT, States JC (2020) Arsenic-induced changes in miRNA expression in cancer and other diseases. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 115306
Zeng Q, Zhang A (2020) Assessing potential mechanisms of arsenic-induced skin lesions and cancers: Human and in vitro evidence. Environ Pollut 260:113919
Pi J, Kumagai Y, Sun G, Yamauchi H, Yoshida T, Iso H, Endo A et al (2000) Decreased serum concentrations of nitric oxide metabolites among Chinese in an endemic area of chronic arsenic poisoning in inner Mongolia. Free Radic Biol Med 28:1137e1142
Sun Y, Pi J, Wang X, Tokar EJ, Liu J, Waalkes MP (2009) Aberrant cytokeratin expression during arsenic-induced acquired malignant phenotype in human HaCaT keratinocytes consistent with epidermal carcinogenesis. Toxicology 262:162e170
Alain G, Tousignant J, Rozenfarb E (1993) Chronic arsenic toxicity. Int J Dermatol 32:899e901
Sun B, Xue J, Li J, Luo F, Chen X et al (2017) Circulating miRNAs and their target genes associated with arsenism caused by coal-burning. Toxicol Res 6:162–172
Banerjee N, Das S, Tripathy S, Bandyopadhyay AK, Sarma N et al (2019) MicroRNAs play an important role in contributing to arsenic susceptibility in the chronically exposed individuals of West Bengal, India. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:28052–28061
States JC, Singh AV, Knudsen TB, Rouchka EC, Ngalame NO et al (2012) Prenatal arsenic exposure alters gene expression in the adult liver to a proinflammatory state contributing to accelerated atherosclerosis. PLoS One 7:e38713
Ren X, Gaile DP, Gong Z, Qiu W, Ge Y et al (2015) Arsenic responsive microRNAs in vivo and their potential involvement in arsenic-induced oxidative stress. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 283:198–209
Gonzalez H, Lema C, Kirken R, Maldonado R, Varela-Ramirez A, Aguilera R (2015) Arsenic-exposed keratinocytes exhibit differential microRNAs expression profile; potential implication of mir-21, miR-200a and miR-141 in melanoma pathway. CCAND 2:138–147
Al-Eryani L, Jenkins SF, States VA, Pan J, Malone JC et al. (2018) miRNA expression profiles of premalignant and malignant arsenic-induced skin lesions. PLoS One 13:e0202579
Liu J, Gunewardena S, Yue Cui J, Klaassen CD, Chorley BN, Corton JC (2020) Transplacental arsenic exposure produced 5-methylcytosine methylation changes and aberrant microRNA expressions in livers of male fetal mice. Toxicology 435:152409
Mumtaz F, Albeltagy RS, Diab MSM, Abdel Moneim AE, El-Habit OH (2020) Exposure to arsenite and cadmium induces organotoxicity and miRNAs deregulation in male rats. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:17184–17193
Takumi S, Okamura K, Suzuki T, Hano H, Nohara K, Yanagisawa H (2020) Gestational arsenic exposure affects gene expression in the kidney and lung in the F1 and F2 Mice. Presented at the.
Zhou X, Sun H, Ellen TP, Chen H, Costa M (2008) Arsenite alters global histone H3 methylation. Carcinogenesis 29(9):1831–1836
Jensen TJ, Novak P, Eblin KE, Gandolfi AJ, Futscher BW (2008) Epigenetic remodeling during arsenical-induced malignant transformation. Carcinogenesis 29(8):1500–1508
Jo WJ, Ren X, Chu F, Aleshin M, Wintz H, Burlingame A, Smith MT, Vulpe CD, Zhang L (2009) Acetylated H4K16 by MYST1 protects UROtsa cells from arsenic toxicity and is decreased following chronic arsenic exposure. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 241(3):294–302
Li J, Chen P, Sinogeeva N, Gorospe M, Wersto RP, Chrest FJ, Barnes J, Liu Y (2002) Arsenic trioxide promotes histone H3 phosphoacetylation at the chromatin of CASPASE-10 in acute promyelocytic leukemia cells. J Biol Chem 277(51):49504–49510
Li J, Gorospe M, Barnes J, Liu Y (2003) Tumor promoter arsenite stimulates histone H3 phosphoacetylation of proto-oncogenes c-fos and c-jun chromatin in human diploid fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 278(15):13183–13191
Carpenter RL, Jiang BH (2013) Roles of EGFR, PI3K, AKT, and mTOR in heavy metal-induced cancer. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 13(3):252–266
Liang C, Feng Z, Manthari RK, Wang C, Han Y, Fu W, Wang J, Zhang J (2020) Arsenic induces dysfunctional autophagy via dual regulation of mTOR pathway and Beclin1-Vps34/PI3K complex in MLTC-1 cells. J Hazard Mater 391:122227
Li T, Wang G (2014) Computer-aided targeting of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway: toxicity reduction and therapeutic opportunities. Int J Mol Sci 15(10):18856–18891
Stueckle TA, Lu Y, Davis ME, Wang L, Jiang BH, Holaskova I, Schafer R, Barnett JB, Rojanasakul Y (2012) Chronic occupational exposure to arsenic induces carcinogenic gene signaling networks and neoplastic transformation in human lung epithelial cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 261(2):204–216
Wang Z, Yang J, Fisher T, Xiao H, Jiang Y, Yang C (2012) Akt activation is responsible for enhanced migratory and invasive behavior of arsenic-transformed human bronchial epithelial cells. Environ Health Perspect 120(1):92–97
Wang G, Zhang T, Sun W, Wang H, Yin F, Wang Z, Zuo D, Sun M, Zhou Z, Lin B, Xu J, Hua Y, Li H, Cai Z (2017) Arsenic sulfide induces apoptosis and autophagy through the activation of ROS/JNK and suppression of Akt/mTOR signaling pathways in osteosarcoma. Free Radic Biol Med 106:24–37
Simeonova PP, Luster MI (2002) Arsenic carcinogenicity: relevance of c-Src activation. Mol Cell Biochem 234(1):277–282
Sung TI, Wang YJ, Chen CY, Hung TL, Guo HR (2012) Increased serum level of epidermal growth factor receptor in liver cancer patients and its association with exposure to arsenic. Sci Total Environ 424:74–78
Miao Z, Wu L, Lu M, Meng X, Gao B, Qiao X, Zhang W, Xue D (2015) Analysis of the transcriptional regulation of cancer-related genes by aberrant DNA methylation of the cis-regulation sites in the promoter region during hepatocyte carcinogenesis caused by arsenic. Oncotarget 6(25):21493
Zhang A, Feng H, Yang G, Pan X, Jiang X, Huang X, Dong X, Yang D, Xie Y, Peng L, Jun L, Hu C, Jian L, Wang X (2007) Unventilated indoor coal-fired stoves in Guizhou province, China: cellular and genetic damage in villagers exposed to arsenic in food and air. Environ Health Perspect 115(4):653–658
Duan T, Hu T, Wu C, Yeh YT, Lu J, Zhang Q, Li X, Jian W, Luo P (2020) PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy is involved in NaAsO2-induced apoptosis of human hepatic cells through activation of ERK signaling. Toxicol in Vitro 66:104857
Kansanen E, Kivelä AM, Levonen AL (2009) Regulation of Nrf2-dependent gene expression by 15-deoxy-Δ12, 14-prostaglandin J2. Free Radic Biol Med 47(9):1310–1317
Kansanen E, Jyrkkänen HK, Levonen AL (2012) Activation of stress signaling pathways by electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids. Free Radic Biol Med 52(6):973–982
Kansanen E, Kuosmanen SM, Leinonen H, Levonen AL (2013) The Keap1-Nrf2 pathway: mechanisms of activation and dysregulation in cancer. Redox Biol 1(1):45–49
Sporn MB, Liby KT (2012) NRF2 and cancer: the good, the bad and the importance of context. Nat Rev Cancer 12(8):564–571
Lau A, Whitman SA, Jaramillo MC, Zhang DD (2013) Arsenic-mediated activation of the Nrf2-Keap1 antioxidant pathway. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 27(2):99–105
Mitsuishi Y, Taguchi K, Kawatani Y, Shibata T, Nukiwa T, Aburatani H, Yamamoto M, Motohashi H (2012) Nrf2 redirects glucose and glutamine into anabolic pathways in metabolic reprogramming. Cancer Cell 22(1):66–79
Katsuragi Y, Ichimura Y, Komatsu M (2016) Regulation of the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway by p62/SQSTM1. Current Opinion in Toxicology 1:54–61
Jiang T, Harder B, De La Vega MR, Wong PK, Chapman E, Zhang DD (2015) p62 links autophagy and Nrf2 signaling. Free Radic Biol Med 88:199–204
Wurzer B, Zaffagnini G, Fracchiolla D, Turco E, Abert C, Romanov J, Martens S (2015) Oligomerization of p62 allows for selection of ubiquitinated cargo and isolation membrane during selective autophagy. Elife 4:e08941
Copple IM, Lister A, Obeng AD, Kitteringham NR, Jenkins RE, Layfield R, Foster BJ, Goldring C, Park BK (2010) Physical and functional interaction of sequestosome 1 with Keap1 regulates the Keap1-Nrf2 cell defense pathway. J Biol Chem 285(22):16782–16788
Taguchi K, Fujikawa N, Komatsu M, Ishii T, Unno M, Akaike T, Motohashi H, Yamamoto M (2012) Keap1 degradation by autophagy for the maintenance of redox homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(34):13561–13566
Jain A, Lamark T, Sjøttem E, Larsen KB, Awuh JA, Øvervatn A, McMahon M, Hayes JD, Johansen T (2010) p62/SQSTM1 is a target gene for transcription factor NRF2 and creates a positive feedback loop by inducing antioxidant response element-driven gene transcription. J Biol Chem 285(29):22576–22591
Wang XJ, Sun Z, Chen W, Li Y, Villeneuve NF, Zhang DD (2008) Activation of Nrf2 by arsenite and monomethylarsonous acid is independent of Keap1-C151: enhanced Keap1-Cul3 interaction. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 230(3):383–389
Sun Z, Chin YE, Zhang DD (2009) Acetylation of Nrf2 by p300/CBP augments promoter-specific DNA binding of Nrf2 during the antioxidant response. Mol Cell Biol 29(10):2658–2672
Wang XJ, Sun Z, Villeneuve NF, Zhang S, Zhao F, Li Y, Chen W, Yi X, Zheng W, Wondrak GT, Wong PK, Zhang DD (2008) Nrf2 enhances resistance of cancer cells to chemotherapeutic drugs, the dark side of Nrf2. Carcinogenesis 29(6):1235–1243
Lau A, Zheng Y, Tao S, Wang H, Whitman SA, White E, Zhang DD (2013) Arsenic inhibits autophagic flux, activating the Nrf2-Keap1 pathway in a p62-dependent manner. Mol Cell Biol 33(12):2436–2446
Gu S, Chen C, Jiang X, Zhang Z (2016) Role of nuclear factor E2 related factor 2 signaling pathway in malignant transformation induced by sodium arsenite. Wei sheng yan jiu= Journal of Hygiene Research 45(3):356–361
Haque R, Chaudhary A, Sadaf N (2017) Immunomodulatory role of arsenic in regulatory T cells. Endocrine, Metabolic & Immune Disorders-Drug Targets (Formerly Current Drug Targets-Immune, Endocrine & Metabolic Disorders) 17(3):176–181
Srivastava RK, Li C, Chaudhary SC, Ballestas ME, Elmets CA, Robbins DJ, Matalon S, Deshane JS, Afaq J, Bickers DR, Athar M (2013) Unfolded protein response (UPR) signaling regulates arsenic trioxide-mediated macrophage innate immune function disruption. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 272(3):879–887
Rao CV, Pal S, Mohammed A, Farooqui M, Doescher MP, Asch AS, Yamada HY (2017) Biological effects and epidemiological consequences of arsenic exposure, and reagents that can ameliorate arsenic damage in vivo. Oncotarget 8(34):57605
Liu S, Sun Q, Wang F, Zhang L, Song Y, Xi S, Sun G (2014) Arsenic induced overexpression of inflammatory cytokines based on the human urothelial cell model in vitro and urinary secretion of individuals chronically exposed to arsenic. Chem Res Toxicol 27(11):1934–1942
Prasad P, Sinha D (2017) Low-level arsenic causes chronic inflammation and suppresses expression of phagocytic receptors. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(12):11708–11721
Dutta K, Prasad P, Sinha D (2015) Chronic low level arsenic exposure evokes inflammatory responses and DNA damage. Int J Hyg Environ Health 218(6):564–574
Surolia R, Li FJ, Mattapally S, Wang Z, Guo Y, Thompson PR, Coonrod S, Athar M, Antony VB (2020) Role of PAD2 regulated inflammasome signaling in arsenic induced airway inflammation and remodeling. In: B29. infection and immune interplay in lung injury. American Thoracic Society. pp A2976-A2976)
Watanabe T, Hirano S (2013) Metabolism of arsenic and its toxicological relevance. Arch Toxicol 87:969–979
Palma-Lara I, Martínez-Castillo M, Quintana-Pérez JC, Arellano-Mendoza MG, Tamay-Cach F et al (2020) Arsenic exposure: a public health problem leading to several cancers. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 110:104539
Abdul KS, Jayasinghe SS, Chandana EP, Jayasumana C, De Silva PM (2015) Arsenic and human health effects: a review. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 40(3):828–846
Bjørklund G, Oliinyk P, Lysiuk R, Rahaman MS, Antonyak H et al (2020) Arsenic intoxication: general aspects and chelating agents. Arch Toxicol 94:1879–1897
Fowler BA, Selene CH, Chou RJ, Jones DL, Sullivan W Jr, Chen CJ (2015) Chapter 28-arsenic. In: Nordberg GF, Fowler BA, Nordberg M (eds) Handbook on the toxicology of metals, 4th edn. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 581–624
Manna P, Sinha M, Sil PC (2008) Arsenic-induced oxidative myocardial injury: protective role of arjunolic acid. Arch Toxicol 82(3):137–149
Wu HE, Abdel-Gawad NM, Gharbaoui Y, Teixeira AL, Pigott TA (2017) An unusual case of acute psychosis with obsessive-compulsive features following arsenic poisoning. J Psychiatr Pract 23(5):382–385
Milton AH, Hussain S, Akter S, Rahman M, Mouly TA, Mitchell K (2017) A review of the effects of chronic arsenic exposure on adverse pregnancy outcomes. Int J Environ Res Public Health 10.3390/ijerph1406 0556
Amadi CN, Igweze ZN, Orisakwe OE (2017) Heavy metals in miscarriages and stillbirths in developing nations. Middle East Fertil Soc J 22(2):91–100
Sanchez TR, Perzanowski M, Graziano JH (2016) Inorganic arsenic and respiratory health, from early life exposure to sex-specific effects: a systematic review. Environ Res 147:537–555
Steinmaus C, Ferreccio C, Acevedo J et al (2014) Increased lung and bladder cancer incidence in adults after in utero and early-life arsenic exposure. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 23(8):1529–1538
Vahter M (2008) Health effects of early life exposure to arsenic. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 102(2):204–211
Young JL, Cai L, States JC (2018) Impact of prenatal arsenic exposure on chronic adult diseases. Syst Biol Reprod Med 64(6):469–483
Hernández-Zavala A, Del Razo LM, García-Vargas GG, Aguilar C, Borja VH, Albores A, Cebrián ME (1999) Altered activity of heme biosynthesis pathway enzymes in individuals chronically exposed to arsenic in Mexico. Arch Toxicol 73(2):90–95
Khairul I, Wang QQ, Jiang YH, Wang C, Naranmandura H (2017) Metabolism, toxicity and anticancer activities of arsenic compounds. Oncotarget 8(14):23905
Moe B, Peng H, Lu X, Chen B, Chen LW, Gabos S, Li X-F, Le XC (2016) Comparative cytotoxicity of fourteen trivalent and pentavalent arsenic species determined using real-time cell sensing. J Environ Sci 49:113–124
Chakraborti D, Rahman MM, Ahamed S, Dutta RN, Pati S, Mukherjee SC (2016) Arsenic contamination of groundwater and its induced health effects in Shahpur block, Bhojpur district, Bihar state, India: risk evaluation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(10):9492–9504
Yamaguchi Y, Madhyastha H, Madhyastha R, Choijookhuu N, Hishikawa Y, Pengjam Y, Nakajima Y, Maruyama M (2016) Arsenic acid inhibits proliferation of skin fibroblasts, and increases cellular senescence through ROS mediated MST1-FOXO signaling pathway. J Toxicol Sci 41(1):105–113
Cohen SM, Arnold LL, Eldan M, Lewis AS, Beck BD (2006) Methylated arsenicals: the implications of metabolism and carcinogenicity studies in rodents to human risk assessment. Crit Rev Toxicol 36(2):99–133
Farooq MA, Gill RA, Ali B, Wang J, Islam F, Ali S, Zhou W (2016) Subcellular distribution, modulation of antioxidant and stress-related genes response to arsenic in Brassica napus L. Ecotoxicology 25(2):350–366
Markopoulos G, Noutsopoulos D, Mantziou S, Vartholomatos G, Monokrousos N, Angelidis C, Tzavaras T (2013) Arsenic induces VL30 retrotransposition: the involvement of oxidative stress and heat-shock protein 70. Toxicol Sci 134(2):312–322
Weng CY, Chiou SY, Wang L, Kou MC, Wang YJ, Wu MJ (2014) Arsenic trioxide induces unfolded protein response in vascular endothelial cells. Arch Toxicol 88(2):213–226
Antoniadis V, Levizou E, Shaheen SM, Ok YS, Sebastian A, Baum C, Prasad MNV, Wenzel WW, Rinklebe J (2017) Trace elements in the soil-plant interface: phytoavailability, translocation, and phytoremediation-a review. Earth Sci Rev 171:621–645
Lodeiro C, Capelo JL, Oliveira E, Lodeiro JF (2019) New toxic emerging contaminants: beyond the toxicological effects. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:1–4
Hu B, Deng F, Chen G, Chen X, Gao W, Long L, Xia J, Chen ZH (2020) Evolution of abscisic acid signaling for stress responses to toxic metals and metalloids. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:Article 909
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The conception and design of the study: M.O., M.M., and V.A. Acquisition of data, analysis, and interpretation of data: M.O., M.M., V.A., R.A.B., M.E., A.G., B.T.U., M.H., L.N., K.N., A.B., M.A.D., and T.K. Drafting the article: M.O., M.M., V.A., R.A.B., M.E., A.G., B.T.U., M.H., L.N., K.N., A.B., and T.K. Revising the article critically for important intellectual content: M.O., V.A., M.E., M.H., L.N., and K.N. Final approval of the version to be submitted: M.O. and V.A.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ozturk, M., Metin, M., Altay, V. et al. Arsenic and Human Health: Genotoxicity, Epigenomic Effects, and Cancer Signaling. Biol Trace Elem Res 200, 988–1001 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-021-02719-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-021-02719-w