Abstract
Purpose of Review
Pediatric interventional radiology (IR) is a growing subspecialty. Here, we review the current role of IR in children with cancer, which uses imaging such as ultrasound, fluoroscopy, and computed tomography to perform minimally invasive procedures. These include biopsy, needle localization, central venous access, thermal ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90, non-tunneled/tunneled drainage catheter placement, and lymphatic interventions.
Recent Findings
Although locoregional therapies for the treatment of cancer in adults are common, they are less common in children, perhaps due to the relative rarity of cancer in children, their typically better performance status, and paucity of comorbidities. Preliminary results from small-scale studies for ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, and transarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 used in the front-line armamentarium of curative therapy are encouraging.
Summary
Pediatric IR offers an array of minimally invasive procedures intended to diagnose and treat pediatric cancer patients. However, more research is required to determine the efficacy of locoregional therapy in children and to define the clinical scenarios where benefit is likely to be optimized.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Interventional radiology (IR) uses imaging such as ultrasound, fluoroscopy, and computed tomography to perform minimally invasive procedures to decrease the morbidity and mortality of traditional surgery. Pediatric IR is a growing subspecialty, and over the last 40 years, it has become part of standard medical care [1, 2]. Approximately 15,000 children in the USA are diagnosed with cancer each year [3]; the subspecialty of pediatric interventional radiology offers an array of procedures intended to diagnose, treat, and provide supportive care.
Radiation Safety
As children are more sensitive to radiation and have longer lifetimes to express changes, a concentrated effort is being made to reduce medical radiation in children [4•, 5•]. The Image Gently, Step Lightly campaign recommends a checklist of goals, including using sonography, “step lightly” by minimizing fluoroscopy time, collimating, lowering the frame rate, using last image hold, and using digital zoom whenever possible. Patient shielding is not routinely recommended as collimation is the best method of reducing extraneous dose; there is some evidence that shielding may actually increase internal backscatter [6].
Often, the smaller body habitus of pediatric patients lends itself to ultrasound guidance. Ultrasound allows real-time imaging guidance without radiation exposure, decreasing the risk of these procedures in the pediatric population.
Sedation
Compared with the majority of adult IR practices, pediatric IR requires deep sedation or general anesthesia for most procedures both to limit motion and for patient comfort [7, 8]. Our institution utilizes an independent anesthesia or sedation team for these services. Whenever possible, multiple procedures are combined to decrease the number of anesthesia occurrences.
Diagnosis
Biopsy
For the initial diagnosis of a tumor, percutaneous needle biopsy (PNB) is often requested. The safety and efficacy of PNB in both adult and pediatric patients has been confirmed and demonstrates excellent results with few complications. With the advent of precision medicine, PNB is often also utilized for molecular studies, for both standard of care and research purposes, and therefore the tissue sample needs to be of sufficient quality/quantity for both histologic diagnosis and any additional molecular studies. Percutaneous needle biopsy is also used for staging to identify the residual or recurrent disease and to obtain microbiologic analysis in patients with known or suspected infection [9].
Prior to biopsy, a review of cross-sectional imaging including ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or positron emission tomography is reviewed to identify a safe pathway and to determine the best area to target within the lesion for the greatest diagnostic yield (i.e., most enhancing or fluorodeoxyglucose-avid region). A multidisciplinary conversation with the referring physician and pathologist may be useful to guide the approximate amount of tissue that will be needed for diagnosis and any additional molecular studies. In addition, real-time touch prep or frozen specimen evaluation can be used to increase the adequacy of the tissue.
When ultrasound is utilized (Fig. 1), a thorough ultrasound scanning immediately prior to the biopsy should be performed to identify a safe approach to the lesion, identify vascular structures, as well as determine more viable portions of the mass. At our institution, the targeted biopsy is always performed with a coaxial system to obtain more than one sample and/or to avoid tract seeding [10]. Post biopsy embolization with Gelfoam (Pfizer, New York, NY) pledgets and/or slurry is routinely performed to minimize blood loss.
Needle Localization
Computed tomography-guided localization of pulmonary nodules prior to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical resection can be performed in children to distinguish malignant and benign etiologies. In children who have had prior chemotherapy and are immunocompromised, infection is a top differential in these patients. Often, imaging findings are not specific to a diagnosis.
In some forms of childhood cancer, such as osteosarcoma, there is a survival benefit when pulmonary metastases are resected. In addition, the chemotherapy regimen may be modified based on the histopathologic findings.
We use a combination method, which utilizes methylene blue mixed with autologous blood and hook wire localization (Kopans breast localization needle, Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN) [11]. If the nodule is subpleural, both the methylene blue/autologous blood patch and hook needle are applied approximately 1–2 cm deep to the nodule (Fig. 2). This avoids methylene blue in the pleural space as well as dislodgement of the hook wire with respirations.
Central Venous Access
Port Placement
Central venous access is required for most pediatric cancer patients. There is a reduced complication rate of image-guided percutaneous port placement compared with the landmark technique [12,13,14].
Compared with tunneled central lines, implantable venous ports are associated with lower rates of central line-associated bloodstream infection and a lower likelihood of requiring revision or replacement over the course of therapy [15]. Although each patient is evaluated individually, our suggested weight for placement of a 5F single lumen venous port is approximately 10 kg, and for placement of a 9.5F dual lumen venous port is approximately 30 kg. The most common indications for dual lumen ports are non-Hodgkin lymphoma and sarcomas (Fig. 3). These patients often require intense chemotherapy with the need for pain medications and total parenteral nutrition, which are not compatible with other medications.
The use of prophylactic antibiotics is controversial; however, we do not use prophylactic antibiotics unless the patient is neutropenic with an absolute neutrophil count of < 1000.
The right internal jugular vein is the preferred vein of interventional radiologists with a short, straight route to the superior vena cava/heart. Access to the internal jugular vein with image guidance avoids pneumothorax and reduces the rate of symptomatic central venous stenoses [16]. To obtain a smooth curve of the catheter, a lateral venous access approach (Fig. 4) is used as close to the clavicle as possible which also minimizes catheter tip movement with neck motion.
Locoregional Therapy
Thermal Ablation
Thermal ablation uses an applicator that is inserted percutaneously into a tumor with image guidance to deliver heat or cold energy and includes radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, and cryoablation. The term “tumor ablation” is defined as the direct application of thermal therapies to a specific focal tumor(s) in an attempt to achieve eradication or substantial tumor reduction [17]. These techniques may also have an impact on the immune system of patients by activating a tumor-associated antigen-specific T-cell response [18•, 19, 20]. Thermal ablation has been widely used in adults as a minimally invasive tumor treatment for both control of tumor and pain management (Fig. 5). It can be performed in almost every organ including the liver, kidney, lung, musculoskeletal system, and pancreas [18•].
These procedures tend to be offered to patients who are poor surgical candidates with comorbidities. However, data are limited in children, perhaps due to the overall rarity of cancer and typically higher performance status with less comorbidities compared with adults. Of note, liver ablation is more effective in cirrhotic livers; however, most pediatric liver malignancy is in the setting of normal liver tissue [21].
Small studies have reported that ablation is feasible in children with primary, recurrent, or metastatic tumors in organs throughout the body, but larger multi-center studies are needed to establish efficacy [18•, 22].
Transarterial Locoregional Arterial Therapies for Pediatric Liver Tumors
Primary liver malignancies account for 1 to 2% of childhood cancers and include hepatoblastoma (HB), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver (UESL), and rhabdoid tumor of the liver (RTL) [23]. Surgical resection is the foundation of cure and is the most important factor for the long-term survival of children with primary liver tumors [24]; however, only one-third of patients have resectable lesions at diagnosis. Effective standard-of-care chemotherapy regimens that decrease tumor size and facilitate conventional resection have only been established for HB [25] and have not been described for HCC, UESL, or RTL. The outcome for patients with unresectable tumor after chemotherapy and for those with recurrent disease continues to be dismal with limited options and guarded outcomes [26••, 27••]. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been established as efficacious in children with HB and in adults with HCC [28]. However, OLT patients will require life-long medical therapy with potential episodes of rejection and occurrence of the post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. “Novel” therapies are needed to downstage/bridge patients to surgery or OLT [27••]. Liver tumors receive blood predominantly from the hepatic artery, in contrast to the normal liver which derives most of its blood supply from the portal circulation. This is the basis of transarterial therapy via the hepatic artery.
Transarterial Chemoembolization
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the most common standard of care for the treatment of locally advanced HCC in adults. Transarterial chemoembolization is a minimally invasive local treatment option that capitalizes on the combined antitumor effects of prolonged dwell time cytotoxic chemotherapy and the ischemia caused by occlusion of the supplying hepatic arteries. In adults with unresectable HCC, TACE offers a significant survival benefit compared with best supportive care. Approximately 80 to 90% of eligible adult patients are successfully bridged to OLT by local tumor control with TACE [29, 30]. It has been reported that TACE is safe and effective for both HB and HCC patients who were bridged to surgical resection or OLT with a low incidence of severe complications [24, 26••, 31, 32••]. A landmark study by Malogolowkin et al. describes 11 patients with HB, HCC, and UESL who were treated with TACE where five of the 11 patients were downstaged to surgery; three of the 11 patients were alive with no evidence of disease at 31–73 months [26••]. Another study describes eight patients with HCC who were treated with TACE where six of the eight patients were bridged to transplant; five of the six patients were alive at 3.4–11 years after the first TACE [32••].
Transarterial Radioembolization with yttrium-90
Transarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 (TARE-Y90) is commonly used in adults with liver tumors and demonstrates durable local control, good long-term outcomes, and equivalent if not superior tumor responses and tolerability when compared with TACE [33]. Transarterial radioembolization uses radioembolic microspheres to carry yttrium-90 to liver tumors via the hepatic artery, where they lodge in the capillary network to deliver cytotoxic radiation via beta decay. Rather than occluding the hepatic artery, in contradistinction to TACE, there is the preservation of blood flow which promotes radiation injury [34]. In children with unresectable liver tumors, TARE-Y90 may offer an alternative therapy to decrease tumor size and allow for surgical resection, as a bridge to liver transplant (Fig. 6), or as a less toxic palliative treatment. Limited data in children demonstrate that TARE-Y90 is both feasible and safe for both palliation or as part of primary pediatric liver tumor curative therapy [27••, 35••, 36••]. Two small studies describe TARE-Y90 used successfully in children as part of therapy with curative intent, which led to hepatic resection in two patients with HB [27••] and two patients with HCC [36••].
In addition to tumor control, preliminary data support future liver remnant hypertrophy, which was seen in five patients treated with intent to cure with a mean percent increase in future liver remnant of 49% (range 16–76%) (Fig. 7); five of five patients went on to hepatic resection [27••, Aguado A unpublished data].
Supportive Care
Drainage Catheter Placement
Percutaneous image-guided drainage catheters can be placed for postoperative collections as well as for organs such as the liver or kidneys (Fig. 8) requiring drainage from outlet obstruction. Interventional radiology-placed drains are often the first-line treatment for infected or symptomatic fluid collections in the absence of indications for immediate surgery. If infected collections are complex, adjuvant intracavitary thrombolytic therapy can be used to facilitate drainage [37].
Tunneled Drainage Catheter Placement
Malignant ascites and pleural effusion are common manifestations of advanced malignancy and are typically refractive to conservative treatment and portend a poor prognosis. They can significantly impact the quality of life, and symptomatic control is often required. Improvement of symptoms can improve performance status and overall sense of well-being. While treatment options include aspiration, recurrence rates are high. Although pleurodesis is an effective treatment for malignant effusion, it is painful, requires hospitalization, and concerns have been raised about the risk of acute respiratory distress, respiratory failure, and death following talc administration [38]. Studies show that tunneled catheter placement supports patient convenience and comfort. Patients and families can be taught to drain ascitic or pleural fluid on their own, reducing the number of trips to the hospital for repeated paracentesis or thoracentesis and allowing more autonomy. A small subset of patients with malignant pleural effusion will also undergo autopleurodesis with a durable resolution of symptoms [39, 40].
Lymphatic Interventions
Different types of surgical procedures, including resection and OLT, can injure the lymphatic ducts and lymph nodes, resulting in postoperative lymphatic leakage (PLL), a difficult to treat and potentially life-threatening complication [41]. Postoperative lymphatic leakage can occur anywhere in the body along the lymphatic chain, leading to pathological accumulation of lymph or chyle (i.e., chylous ascites, chylothorax) [42••]. Refractory PLL can significantly affect postoperative recovery times, wound healing, and quality of life. High-output PLL increases morbidity and mortality among patients due to lymphocytopenia, protein loss, fat loss, malnutrition, respiratory distress, and immune suppression. When conservative management fails, lymphangiography and embolization can provide an alternative therapy to surgery (Fig. 9) [43].
Conclusion
Pediatric interventional oncology offers an array of minimally invasive procedures intended to diagnose and treat pediatric cancer patients. As a growing subspecialty, more research is required to determine the efficacy of locoregional therapy in children and to define the clinical scenarios where benefit is likely to be optimized.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Roebuck DJ, McLaren CA. Pediatric interventional radiology – does it add value? Pediatr Radiol. 2021;51:570–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04935-3.
Donaldson JS. Pediatric interventional radiology: a maturing subspecialty. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47:649–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3797-x.
Shilati FM, Raval MV, Lautz TB. Technical factors and outcomes in pediatric central venous port placement. J Pediatr Surg. 2022;57:450–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.02.055.
• Johnson C, Martin-Carreras T, Rabinowitz D. Pediatric interventional radiology and dose-reduction techniques. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2014;35:409–14. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2014.05.007. This study describes different strategies for dose reduction in pediatric patients.
• Sidhu M, Strauss KJ, Connolly B, Yoshizumi TT, Racadio J, Coley BD. Radiation safety in pediatric interventional radiology. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;13:158–66. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.tvir.2010.03.004. This study describes different strategies and safety checklists for dose reduction in pediatric patients.
The Image Gently Alliance. Image gently. https://www.imagegently.org. Published 2014. Accessed January 20 2022.
Kaufman CS, James CA, Harned RK, Connolly BL, Roebuck DJ, Cahill AM, Dubois J, Morello FP, Morgan RK, Sidhu MK. Pediatric interventional radiology workforce survey: 10-year follow-up. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47:651–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3796-y.
Nelson O, Bailey PD Jr. Pediatric anesthesia considerations for interventional radiology. Anesthesiol Clin. 2017;35:701–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2017.08.003.
Sheth RA, Baerlocher MO, Connolly BL, Dariushnia SR, Shyn PB, Vatsky S, Tam AL, Gupta S. Society of Interventional Radiology quality improvement standards on percutaneous needle biopsy in adult and pediatric patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020;31:1840–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2020.07.012.
Maturen KE, Nghiem HV, Marrero JA, Hussain HK, Higgins EG, Fox GA, Francis IR. Lack of tumor seeding of hepatocellular carcinoma after percutaneous needle biopsy using coaxial cutting needle technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:1184–7. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.1347.
McDaniel JD, Racadio JM, Patel MN, Johnson ND, Kukreja K. CT-guided localization of pulmonary nodules in children prior to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical resection utilizing a combination of two previously described techniques. Pediatr Radiol. 2018;48:626–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4069-0.
Peynircioglu B, Canyigit M, Ergun O, Pamuk GA, Cil BE. Radiologically placed venous ports in children. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007;18:1389–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2007.07.010.
Tseng M, Sadler D, Wong J, Teague KR, Schemmer DC, Saliken JC, So B, Gray RR. Radiologic placement of central venous catheters: rates of success and immediate complications in 3412 cases. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2001;52:379–84.
Chait PG, Temple M, Connolly B, John P, Restrepo R, Amaral JG. Pediatric interventional venous access. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002;5:95–102. https://doi.org/10.1053/tvir.2002.36047.
Rinke ML, Heo M, Saiman L, Bundy DG, Rosenberg RE, DeLaMora P, Rabin B, Zachariah P, Mirhaji P, Ford WJH, Obaro-Best O, Drasher M, Klein E, Peshansky A, Oyeku SO. Pediatric ambulatory central line-associated bloodstream infections. Pediatrics. 2021;147:e20200524. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-0524.
Trerotola SO, Kuhn-Fulton J, Johnson MS, Shah H, Ambrosius WT, Kneebone PH. Tunneled infusion catheters: increased incidence of symptomatic venous thrombosis after subclavian versus internal jugular venous access. Radiology. 2000;217:89–93. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.217.1.r00oc2789.
Goldberg SN, Grassi CJ, Cardella JF, Charboneau JW, Dodd GD 3rd, Dupuy DE, Gervais DA, Gillams AR, Kane RA, Lee FT Jr, Livraghi T, McGahan J, Phillips DA, Rhim H, Silverman SG, Solbiati L, Vogl TJ, Wood BJ, Vedantham S, Sacks D, Society of Interventional Radiology Technology Assessment Committee and the International Working Group on image-guided tumor ablation. Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20:S377–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2009.04.011.
• Gomez FM, Patel PA, Stuart S, Roebuck DJ. Systematic review of ablation techniques for the treatment of malignant or aggressive benign lesions in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2014;44:1281–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3001-5. This study describes the use of ablation for 28 pediatric patients with liver, lung, bone, soft tissue, kidney, or pancreas malignancies.
Vogl TJ, Wissniowski TT, Naguib NNN, Hammerstingl RM, Mack MG, Munch S, Ocker M, Strobel D, Hahn EG, Hansler J. Activation of tumor-specific T lymphocytes after laser-induced thermotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2009;58:1557–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-009-0663-1.
Rao P, Escudier B, de Baere T. Spontaneous regression of multiple pulmonary metastases after radiofrequency ablation of a single metastasis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011;34:424–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-9896-9.
Hawkins CM, Towbin AJ, Roebuck DJ, Monroe EJ, Gill AE, Thakor AS, Towbin RB, Cahill AM, Lungren MP. Role of interventional radiology in managing pediatric liver tumors: part 2: percutaneous interventions. Pediatr Radiol. 2018;48:565–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4072-5.
Hoffer FA, Daw NC, Xiong X, Anghelescu D, Krasin M, Yan X, Davidoff AM, Furman WL, Rogriguez-Galindo C, Spunt SL. A phase 1/pilot study of radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of recurrent pediatric solid tumors. Cancer. 2009;115:1328–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24158.
Emre S, Umman V, Rodriguez-Davolos M. Current concepts in pediatric liver tumors. Pediatr Transplant. 2012;16:549–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3046.2012.01704.x.
Ohtsuka Y, Matsunaga T, Yoshida H, Kouchi K, Okada T, Ohnuma N. Optimal strategy of preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatoblastoma. Surg Today. 2004;34:127–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-003-2663-7.
Trobaugh-Lotrario AD, Katzenstein HM. Chemotherapeutic approaches for newly diagnosed hepatoblastoma: past, present, and future strategies. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012;59:809–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.24219.
•• Malogolowkin MH, Stanley P, Steele DA, Ortega JA. Feasibility and toxicity of chemoembolization for children with liver tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1279–84. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2000.18.6.1279. Landmark study describing the use of TACE in 11 patients with HB, HCC, and UESL where five of 11 patients were downstaged to hepatic resection with three of 11 alive with no evidence of disease at 31–73 months.
•• Aguado A, Dunn SP, Averill LW, Chikwava KR, Gresh R, Rabinowitz D, Katzenstein HM. Successful use of transarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 (TARE-90) in two children with hepatoblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020;67:e28421. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.28421. The first study describing the use of TARE-Y90 as part of upfront curative therapy in two pediatric patients with HB. Both were downstaged to hepatic resection, with two of two alive with no evidence of disease at 21–31 months post-completion chemotherapy.
Meyers RL, Tiao G, de Ville de Goyet J, Superina R, Aronson DC. Hepatoblastoma state of the art: pre-treatment extent of disease, surgical resection guidelines and the role of liver transplantation. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2014;26:29–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000042.
Llovet JM, Real MI, Montana X, Planas R, Coll S, Aponte J, Ayuso C, Sala M, Muchart J, Sola R, Rodes J, Bruix J, Barcelona Liver Cancer Group. Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1734–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08649-X.
Lo CM, Ngan H, Tso WK, Liu CL, Lam CM, Poon RTP, Fan ST, Wong J. Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2002;35:1164–71. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2002.33156.
Li JP, Chu JP, Yang JY, Chen W, Wang Y, Huang YH. Preoperative transcatheter selective arterial chemoembolization in treatment of unresectable hepatoblastoma in infants and children. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008;31:1117–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-008-9373-x.
•• Weiss KE, Sze DY, Rangaswami AA, Esquivel CO, Concepcion W, Lebowitz EA, Kothary N, Lungren MP. Transarterial chemoembolization in children to treat unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Pediatr Transplant. 2018;22:e13187. https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.13187. This study describes the use of TACE in eight pediatric patients with HCC where six of eight were bridged to transplant, with five of six alive at 3.4–11 years post first TACE.
Saini A, Wallace A, Alzubaidl S, Knuttinen MG, Naidu S, Sheth R, Albadawi H, Oklu R. History and evolution of yttrium-90 radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Med. 2019;8:55. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8010055.
Miller FH, Vendrami CL, Gabr A, Horowitz JM, Kelahan LC, Riaz A, Salem R, Lewandowski RJ. Evolution of radioembolization in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a pictorial review. Radiographics. 2021;41:1802–18. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2021210014.
•• Aguado A, Ristagno R, Towbin AJ, Gupta A, Haberle S, Qi Z, Patel MN, Kukreja KU, Tiao GM, Geller JI. Transarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 of unresectable primary hepatic malignancy in children. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019;66:e27510. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.27510. The first larger-scale study describing the palliative use of TARE-Y90 in heavily pretreated children with HB, HCC, and transitional liver tumors, which showed that it was feasible and demonstrated anticancer effects by imaging and decreased tumor markers.
•• Whitlock RS, Loo C, Patel K, Bista R, Goss JA, Heczey A, Khan O, Lopez-Terrada D, Masand P, Nguyen H, Mahvash A, Vasudevan SA, Kukreja K. Transarterial radioembolization treatment as a bridge to surgical resection in pediatric hepatocellular carcinoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2021;43:e1181–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPH.0000000000002089. The first study describing the use of TARE-Y90 as part of curative therapy in two pediatric patients with HCC. Both were downstaged to hepatic resection, with one alive with no evidence of disease 18 months post-completion chemotherapy and one alive with evidence of disease 13 months post-resection.
Gervais DA, Brown SD, Connolly SA, Brec SL, Harisinghani MG, Mueller PR. Percutaneous imaging-guided abdominal and pelvic abscess drainage in children. Radiographics. 2004;24:737–54. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.243035107.
Dresler CM, Olak J, Herndon JE 2nd, Richards WG, Scalzetti E, Fleishman SB, Kernstine KH, Demmy T, Jablons DM, Kohman L, Daniel TM, Haasler GB, Sugarbaker DJ, Cooperative Groups Cancer and Leukemia Group B; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; North Central Cooperative Oncology Group; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Phase III intergroup study of talc poudrage vs talc slurry sclerosis for malignant pleural effusion. Chest. 2005;127:909–15. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.127.3.909.
Adams J, Auger J, Schiff D. Outcome of indwelling tunneled PleurX® catheter placement in pediatric and young adult patients with malignant effusions. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61:1118–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.24919.
Li D, Hussaini S, Kang J, Madoff DC. The role of interventional oncology in the palliative care of cancer patients. Expert Rev Qual Life Cancer Care. 2016;1:73–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/23809000.2016.1142358.
Lv S, Wang Q, Zhao W, Han L, Wang L, Batchu N, et al. A review of the postoperative lymphatic leakage. Oncotarget. 2017;8:69062–75. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17297.
•• Kim J, Won JH. Percutaneous treatment of chylous ascites. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;19:291–8. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.tvir.2016.10.006. This study describes the use of lymphatic embolization for the treatment of postoperative lymphatic leakage.
Sommer CM, Pieper CC, Itkin M, Nadolski GJ, Hur S, Kim J, Maleux G, Kauczor HU, Richter GM. Conventional lymphangiography (CL) in the management of postoperative lymphatic leakage (PLL): a systematic review. Rofo. 2020;192:1025–35. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1131-7889.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Allison Aguado, MD, declares she has no competing interests.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Interventional Oncology
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Aguado, A. Role of Interventional Radiology in Pediatric Cancer Patients. Curr Oncol Rep 24, 1731–1740 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-022-01320-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-022-01320-1