Introduction

Although parasites represent an important component of nature parasitizing several groups of animals, including threatened vertebrates, e.g. Pisces, Amphibia, Reptilia, Aves, and Mammalia (Muniz-Pereira et al. 2009), the parasites have historically been underrepresented in ecological studies (Bower et al. 2019). The frequent description of new species (Araujo-Filho et al. 2015; Larrat et al. 2018; Felix-Nascimento et al. 2020; Matias et al. 2020; Morais et al. 2020), records of new hosts (Müller et al. 2018; Oliveira et al. 2019; Araujo-Filho et al. 2020; Silva-Neta et al. 2020) and the high prevalence of helminth infection in certain animal populations (Anjos et al. 2013; Lins et al. 2017; Amorim et al. 2019a; Souza et al. 2019; Dib et al. 2020; Madelaire et al. 2020) reinforce the need for greater effort in studies including parasites and it is essential to understand the diversity and distribution of these parasites in megadiverse regions such as the Neotropical region.

In Brazil, about 1,188 amphibian species are registered (Segalla et al. 2021). In the northeast region, about 226 species of amphibians are recorded (Freitas 2015) and at least 20 species are endemic (Garda et al. 2017). Despite this high species richness and the growing number of studies on amphibian helminth fauna in this region (Lins et al. 2017; Alcantara et al. 2018; Silva et al. 2018, 2019; Oliveira et al. 2019; Silva-Neta et al. 2020), there are still extensive knowledge gaps concerning their associated helminth fauna, including gaps for entire regions. For example, there are few studies on the diversity of parasites associated with amphibians in the state of Piauí. So far, only three helminths taxa (acanthocephalan cysthacanth, Rhabdias breviensis Nascimento et al., 2013, and Rhabdias pseudosphaerocephala Kuzmin et al., 2007) are reported parasitizing four species of amphibians: Rhinella diptycha (Cope, 1862), Rhinella granulosa (Spix, 1824), Leptodactylus macrosternum Miranda-Ribeiro, 1926, and Proceratophrys cristiceps (Müller, 1883) in the state of Piauí (Müller et al. 2018; Silva et al. 2019; Vieira et al. 2021) and only three other studies regarding helminths parasitizing reptile species in the state were published (Ávila and Silva 2010; Ávila et al. 2012; Matias et al. 2018).

Therefore, the present study was undertaken to study the diversity of parasitic helminths in amphibians in the state of Piauí, northeastern Brazil. We also present an update of all helminth species in South America associated with the four host species here studied. This is the first study on the diversity of parasitic helminths associated with amphibians in the state of Piauí, northeastern Brazil.

Materials and methods

The hosts were examined from three locations in the state of Piauí: (i) Sete Cidades National Park (4°05’32” S, 41°40’48” W), municipalities of Brasileira and Piracuruca; (ii) Nazareth Eco Resort (4°48’1” S, 42°36’43” W), municipality of José de Freitas; and (iii) the campus of the Universidade Federal do Piauí (7°4’56.03” S, 41°26’11.25” W), municipality of Picos, northeastern Brazil. The hosts are deposited in the Scientific Collection of Herpetology of the Universidade Federal do Piauí, Picos campus.

For parasitological examination, the hosts were necropsied and the mouth, esophagus, stomach, small and large intestines, lungs, heart, liver, gallbladder, kidneys, bladder, and celomic cavity were examined under a stereomicroscope. The helminths found were prepared on temporary slides, following the classic methodology for each taxonomic group. The nematodes were cleared with lactic acid (Andrade 2000) and for the species identification, the morphology and morphometry of the following characters were analyzed: body length and width, esophagus, tail length, the arrangement of the male caudal papillae, gubernaculum, the distance of vulva to anterior end, and egg size). For digeneans, the specimens were stained using the hydrochloric carmine technique (Amato et al. 1991) and for species identification, the body length and width, length and width of oral and ventral suckers, esophagus, pharynx, intestinal caeca, ovary, testes, and eggs were analyzed. All morphological analyses were performed in a digital image analysis system (Leica Application Suite, V3.8, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) coupled to a DM 5000B microscope with differential interference contrast (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Helminths were identified based on Yamaguti (1961), Vicente et al. (1991), Anderson (2000), Gibbons (2010), and Fernandes and Kohn (2014). Then, the helminths were deposited in the Helminthological Collection of the Institute of Biosciences (CHIBB), Universidade Estadual Paulista, municipality of Botucatu, São Paulo state, Brazil. We analyzed the richness, prevalence, abundance, and mean intensity of infection according to Bush et al. (1997). We used descriptive analysis to correlate the parasite richness and abundance with the number of hosts examined. The effects of abundance and sampling effort (or more precisely, the number of hosts examined) were selected as good determinants of helminth diversity (e.g. Walther et al. 1995; Poulin et al. 2003; Campião et al. 2015a). Moreover, we present an update of all helminth species associated with Dermatonotus muelleri (Boettger, 1885), Leptodactylus vastus Lutz, 1930, Rhinella diptycha (Cope, 1862), and Trachycephalus typhonius (Linnaeus, 1758) in South America. For this, we analyzed all studies from the literature, and the references cited in these same articles, through the search on the topic in the main databases (e.g. Google Scholar, Scielo, Scopus, and Web of Science).

The research related to animals complied with all the relevant national regulations and institutional policies for the care and use of animals. The samples were collected with the following licenses: Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade – ICMBio (SISBIO, #22,508).

Results

We examined 75 specimens of four amphibian species, 33 D. muelleri, 17 L. vastus, 22 R. diptycha, and three T. typhonius. The overall prevalence of infection with helminths observed in the 75 host specimens examined was 86.7%, i.e. 65 anurans were infected with at least one helminth taxon. All parasitized hosts presented high values for the analyzed parameters of infection. In total, we found 2,024 helminth parasite specimens. The prevalence of infection in hosts ranged from 64.7 to 100%; the mean intensity of infection ranged from 6.1 to 69.3; the mean abundance ranged from 5.5 to 69.3. The number of parasites per host ranged from 122 to 1,468 (Table 1).

Table 1 Parameters of infection of the amphibian species analyzed from northeastern Brazil

We found 13 taxa of parasitic helminths: the nematodes Aplectana crucifer Travassos, 1925, Aplectana vellardi Travassos, 1926, Cosmocerca podicipinus Baker and Vaucher, 1984, Cosmocercidae gen. sp., nematode cysts, nematode larvae, Ochoterenella digiticauda Caballero, 1944, Ochoterenella sp., Oswaldocruzia lopesi Freitas and Lent, 1938, Oswaldocruzia sp., Oxyascaris oxyascaris Travassos, 1920, Raillietnema spectans Gomes, 1964, and the digenean Rauschiella linguatula (Rudolphi, 1819). The most abundant parasite species were Raillietnema spectans (n = 961) and Aplectana vellardi (n = 364). Helminth parasites were found at eight infection sites and the small and large intestines were the most parasitized (Table 2).

Table 2 Hosts examined and their associated parasites in northeastern Brazil

In our compilation, we recorded 18 taxa of helminths associated with D. muelleri. Aplectana crucifer and A. vellardi represent new records of parasites associated with D. muelleri. For Leptodactylus vastus, 23 species of associated helminths were recorded and five taxa (C. podicipinus, O. digiticauda, ​​O. lopesi, O. oxyascaris, and R. linguatula) represent new records of parasites. For Rhinella diptycha, we recorded 24 species of associated helminths and A. vellardi and R. linguatula represent new records of parasites associated with this bufonid. Finally, for T. typhonius, we recorded 23 species of associated helminths and A. vellardi is a new parasite record for T. typhonius. Overall, we found ten new records of parasitic helminths for the four amphibian species examined (Table 3).

Table 3 Update of helminth parasites associated with Dermatonotus muelleri, Leptodactylus vastus, Rhinella diptycha, and Trachycephalus typhonius in South America

The descriptive analysis showed a positive correlation between the number of parasites found and parasite species richness, and also between the number of hosts examined and the parasite species richness. Both correlations showed a strong trend in sampling effort (i.e. number of parasites found vs. parasite species richness, R2 = 0.9502; and the number of hosts examined vs. parasite species richness, R2 = 0.9784) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Relationship between the number of parasites found and parasite species richness (upper panel), and the number of hosts examined and parasite species richness (lower panel) from northeastern Brazil. The dotted line represents the trend

Discussion

In this study, we recorded a high diversity of amphibian helminth parasites. All hosts presented high values ​​for the analyzed parameters of infection (Table 1). Despite this high prevalence of infection and the growing number of studies on amphibian helminth fauna in Brazil (e.g. Campião et al. 2014, 2015a; Martins-Sobrinho et al. 2017), the number of studies still does not match the high richness of amphibian species occurring in the country. Here, we examine the helminth fauna of four amphibian species from northeastern Brazil and, from our literature compilation, report another ten taxa of helminth parasites associated with the examined amphibian species in South America. These results confirm the strong influence of the study effort as a determinant of the richness of parasite species, as found in the study by Campião et al. (2015a), where the most studied hosts had, by far, the richest parasitic fauna. Therefore, it is clear that anurans that apparently have a low richness of helminths are, in fact, species that have been little studied (Campião et al. 2015a). Thus, further studies should increase the number of parasites associated with these host species.

The fossorial species D. muelleri presented the highest prevalence of infection (93.9%) and the highest abundance of parasites (1,468 individuals; 72.5% of the total). Besides, although the helminth fauna of D. muelleri has already been examined in other studies (e.g. Alcantara et al. 2018; González et al. 2020), two of the six parasite species found represent new host records, the total number of parasitic helminths associated with D. muelleri was increased to 18. In general, small anurans have low parasite diversity, despite their habit and taxonomy (Campião et al. 2015b). Apparently, fossorial species tend to have less richness of parasites. For example, Pleurodema diplolister (Peters, 1870) has hosted a more restricted helminth fauna, a result that might be associated with restricting the temporal window available to acquire parasites (Madelaire et al. 2020). On the other hand, other burrowing species (e.g. Rhinella fernandezae (Gallardo, 1957)) have already recorded high parasite richness (n = 22, Hamann et al. 2013). Thus, our results (n = 1,468 of 6 taxa of parasitic helminths, Table 1) and literature review (n = 18 spp., Table 3) reinforce the need for further studies, in particular for species that perform estivation, as D. muelleri (Nomura et al. 2009). These results suggest that, for these species, other factors, in addition to the hosts’ habitat, may influence the parasitism rates. Previous studies indicate that coevolutionary and biological restrictions on the host species may limit or allow infection of parasitic species regardless of the host’s habitat (Campião et al. 2016a). Other host features, such as diet and behavior, might be equally important in determining parasite diversity and composition (Campião et al. 2015b).

The species richness and helminthological composition found in R. diptycha were similar to that found in the same species in other locations, e.g. states of Ceará and Rio Grande do Norte (Amorim et al. 2019b; Madelaire et al. 2020), and with other species of the genus (e.g. R. granulosa, n = 7 spp., Teles et al. 2018R. fernandezae, n = 5 spp., Draghi et al. 2020). On the other hand, previous studies for other species of the genus found a more diverse richness and composition. For example, R. fernandezae (n = 22 spp., Hamann et al. 2013), R. icterica (n = 12 spp., Santos et al. 2013) and Rmajor (n = 15 spp., Hamann and González 2015). Despite the large size and wide geographic distribution of R. diptycha in Brazil (Stevaux 2002; Pereyra et al. 2021), the number of studies related to its helminth fauna is still scarce (i.e. Amorim et al. 2019b; Madelaire et al. 2020). In this study, of the seven parasite taxa found in R. diptycha, two represent new records for this host. Overall, the number of parasitic helminths associated with R. diptycha increased to 24 spp.

Although we analyzed only three individuals of T. typhonius, all of them were infected with helminth parasites, with high values ​​of mean intensity of infection and mean abundance (~ 70 parasites per host). The number of helminths found was also high (n = 208). In this host, we found only two helminth taxa: A. vellardi and non-identified nematode larvae. The first one represents a new host record. On the other hand, with the compilation of the literature, we found that among the hosts analyzed here, T. typhonius (together with L. vastus) was the second species with a greater richness of associated helminths (n = 23 spp., Table 3). Previous studies showed that, among tree frogs, T. typhonius hosted the richest helminth community and the highest taxonomic diversity value (Campião et al. 2015b).

Oliveira et al. (2019) suggest that leptodactylids from northeastern Brazil (Caatinga biome) might harbor a lower richness of endoparasites compared to leptodactylids from other localities (e.g. 14 spp. in Leptodactylus chaquensis Cei, 1950 from the Brazilian Pantanal, Campião et al. 2016a). However, in the present study, L. vastus presented a high and similar richness of parasite species (n = 10 spp.) compared with several other leptodactylids of moderate-large size (sensu de Sá et al. 2014) from other localities, for example, 8 spp. in Leptodactylus latrans (Steffen, 1815) in the Atlantic Forest (Toledo et al. 2015; Graça et al. 2017); 7 spp. in Leptodactylus ocellatus (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Cerrado / Amazon ecotone (Goldberg et al. 2009); and 7 spp. in L. chaquensis in the Cerrado (Queiroz et al. 2020). Besides, in our extensive compilation, we recorded a high number of parasites associated with L. vastus (n = 23 species in total), including in regions of northeastern Brazil (Caatinga biome). Many of these parasite species, even those commonly found in amphibians, such as O. lopesi (Campião et al. 2014), were considered here as new records of helminths in the studied species.

We also found low parasite species richness for the same species analyzed by Oliveira et al. (2019) or congeneric species in other locations outside of northeastern Brazil (see Graça et al. 2017 and Queiroz et al. 2020). Thus, it is evident that it is not the parasite species richness in leptodactylids from northeastern Brazil or Caatinga biome that is smaller, but that there is a great lack of studies for most amphibian species and several regions with extensive knowledge gaps about parasitic helminths of amphibians. On the other hand, only one digenean species (R. linguatula) was found infecting one of the four species surveyed in the present study. A similar result was found by Alcantara et al. (2018) for D. muelleri from the Ceará state, e.g., hosts were infected only with nematodes. Digeneans have a complex life cycle involving a mollusk as a first intermediate host and also can use a second intermediate or paratenic host. Northeastern Brazil has long dry periods and little rainfall. Low local humidity can make it difficult to establish mollusk populations and thus justify the low diversity of these amphibian parasites in the region. Acanthocephalans and cestodes may be rare for a similar reason. How they depend on intermediate hosts to complete the biological cycle, the environmental variables could difficult the establishment of these parasites. Specifically, for the state of Piauí, this is the first study about the diversity of parasitic helminths associated with amphibians in this state. Our results reinforce the need for further studies in several areas of northeastern Brazil to a better knowledge of the amphibian parasite biodiversity in this region.

Recently, it has been demonstrated that the diversity of infected hosts is determined by biogeographical gradients in pools of species of the hosts. These findings emphasize the need to take into account the diversity of underlying species when assessing the host-parasite specificity (Wells et al. 2019). Studies on the diversity of amphibians in the sampled areas (e.g. Benício et al. 2015; Araújo et al. 2020) have found a high species richness, including species endemic to certain biomes. These areas are inserted in a hotspot for the conservation of the world biodiversity – the Cerrado biome (Klink and Machado 2005) and an exclusively Brazilian biome – the Caatinga biome, considered one of the richest semi-arid regions in the world (Oliveira and Diniz-Filho 2010), with a high rate of endemism (Oliveira et al. 2012). Thus, we recommend future studies on the diversity and distribution of hosts and their associated helminth fauna in these highly diverse, threatened, and under-studied regions.

Our study is the first to address the diversity of amphibian parasites in the state of Piauí, northeastern Brazil. We also present ten new records of parasitic helminths with the four host species studied and an extensive compilation of parasites associated with them in South America. Our findings contribute to the knowledge of the parasite-host relationship, increasing our information on the diversity of parasitic helminths of amphibians in the state of Piauí. However, extensive knowledge gaps about amphibians and their associated helminth fauna are still evident in these semi-arid areas of the Neotropical region.