Abstract
Light flux and quality are crucial factor for setting endogenous plant circadian rhythms. Evaluating the daily rhythmicity of leaf chlorophyll content is an effective method to monitor the plant physiological endogenous clock in response to environmental signals such as light availability/quality. Here, we used a leaf-clip sensor to monitor diurnal rhythms in the content of chlorophyll and flavonoids such as flavonols and anthocyanins in three green- (Ailanthus altissima, Tilia platyphyllos and Platanus × acerifolia) and two red-leafed (Acer platanoides cv. Crimson King and Prunus cerasifera var. pissardii) tree species, adapted to sun (L) or shade (S). Significant differences in chlorophyll content (Chl) and its variations during the day were observed among treatments in all the analyzed species. S-plants had more Chl than L-plants irrespective of leaf color, and Chl variations were more distinct during the day than in L-plants. In particular, contents were lowest in the morning (9:00) and in the middle of the day (at 12:00 and 15:00), and the highest at dusk (21:00). The less evident trends in Chl variation in L-plants were attributed to a decrease in Chl content in high light, which likely masked any increases in the shaded counterparts during the afternoon. Daily flavonol levels did not vary no notably during the day. In sun-exposed red leaves, anthocyanins partially screened mesophyll cells from incident light, and its levels were similar to the Chl dynamics in the shaded counterparts. This study provides new bases for further work on endogenous rhythms of plant pigments and improves our understanding of plant physiology in the context of day/night rhythmicity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The circadian clock is an endogenous 24-h timer that plays a fundamental role, synchronising physiological, biochemical and developmental processes in plants with the outside world (Barak et al. 2000; Inoue et al. 2018; Lee et al. 2021). Light/dark or temperature fluctuations act as time-keeping signals to a plant oscillator, resetting or extending a biological plant phase (Barak et al. 2000; Soengas et al. 2018). Synchrony of the plant endogenous rhythms to environmental rhythms (e.g., light and temperature) confers photosynthetic advantages, improving plant growth and performances and promoting plant acclimation to external stimuli (Dodd et al. 2005). Light quantity and quality are important factors to mark the endogenous circadian rhythms in plants. The light signal operates primarily by modulating the transcription of numerous genes related to plant physiological processes (Rugnone et al. 2013). In molecular studies of herbaceous species as Arabidopsis thaliana, the core oscillator of the circadian clock was found to comprise evening- and morning-phased transcription factors (Wang and Tobin 1998; Barak et al. 2000; Rugnone et al. 2013; Nakamichi 2020). Furthermore, many of the key genes related to the biosynthesis of light-harvesting complexes, pigments, and pigment-binding proteins fluctuate synchronously with the day/night cycle (Harmer et al. 2000; Covington et al. 2008; Schmid 2008; Khan et al. 2010).
The synthesis/degradation cycle of chlorophyll and of non-covalently bound light-harvesting proteins (Schmid 2008) are markers of the chlorophyll daily rhythmicity in leaves; thus, analysis of the daily rhythmicity of chlorophyll content in leaves is a rapid method to characterize the endogenous clock in plants in response to daily environmental variations (Samsone et al. 2007; Pan et al. 2015; García-Plazaola et al. 2017). In addition, pigment variations can be measured using different non-invasive approaches: (1) delayed fluorescence (Gould et al. 2009), (2) chlorophyll meter (Hoel and Solhaug 1998; Samsone et al. 2007; Mamrutha et al. 2017), and (3) multispectral imaging (Pan et al. 2015). Despite that, only a few species-specific investigations have been done on chlorophyll circadian rhythmicity. For example, Samsone et al. (2007) used a SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter to show that leaf chlorophyll content in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) leaves was lowest in the morning and highest at sunset. Conversely, using the same meter during a natural night-day-night cycle experiment on winter wheat (Triticum aestivum), Hoel and Solhaug (1998) found that chlorophyll contents were highest at dawn and dusk and lowest at midday.
Leaf shading treatments can also strongly influence the leaf chlorophyll contents (Lichtenthaler et al. 1981; Dai et al. 2009) and may affect circadian rhythms. Plants grown in the shade can optimize light absorption by increasing chlorophyll density per unit leaf mass (Boardman 1977; Lichtenthaler et al. 1981; Wittmann et al. 2001; Dai et al. 2009). However, previous studies have focused on chlorophyll rhythmicity only in light-exposed leaves (Hoel and Solhaug 1998; Samsone et al. 2007), and to the best of our knowledge, no studies have investigated circadian rhythms in pigment levels in shade-adapted versus sun-exposed plants.
Circadian rhythms and light conditions can also affect other non-photosynthetic leaf pigments such as flavonoids (e.g., flavonols and anthocyanins) (Thain et al. 2002). In leaves, flavonoids, and in particular flavonols (e.g., quercetin), can play a key role as antioxidants for photoprotection (Agati et al. 2020). Anthocyanins differ from other flavonoids for their particular reddish/purplish colouration (Gould et al. 2008; Landi et al. 2015). Anthocyanins absorb mainly in the visible green spectrum (520–560 nm) but also a considerable amount in blue range (450–490 nm) (Landi et al. 2021). This particular feature can induce physiological adjustments in cyanic leaves similar to those in shaded leaves, causing the so-called “shade avoidance syndrome” (Manetas et al. 2003; Landi et al. 2021). Therefore, the presence of anthocyanins may indirectly influence the chlorophyll circadian rhythms due to their photoprotective functions.
Trees, more than herbaceous species, can provide a record of plant rhythmicity through the production of annual woody rings. Usually, young trees grow in the understory, which receives only 0.5%–5% of the sunlight (Chazdon and Pearcy 1991), and their leaves acclimate to the shade (Cao 2000). Moreover, some tree species have red leaves, either constitutively (e.g., in ornamental species) or transiently (i.e., in young or senescing leaves), due to the presence of anthocyanins (Manetas et al. 2003; Hughes et al. 2014; Lo Piccolo et al. 2020, 2021). Therefore, circadian leaf rhythms could be potentially set to maximize light harvesting in different environmental and physiological conditions. Elucidating the pigment dynamics as daily light and light availability (sun versus shade) vary has increase our understanding of the rhythmicity of leaf physiology and more generally of tree performance.
Therefore, here we used an optical leaf-clip sensor to monitor the circadian rhythmicity in the leaf chlorophyll, flavonol and anthocyanin contents in three green-leafed tree species (Platanus × acerifolia, Tilia platyphyllos and Ailanthus altissima) and two red-leafed (Prunus cerasifera var. pissardii and Acer platanoides cv. Crimson King) in full sun and in shade. We also explored whether red leaves, rich in anthocyanins in the adaxial epidermis (shading the subjacent mesophyll cells) can screen part of the incident light that reaches the leaf lamina, as shaded leaves do.
Materials and methods
Plant material and experimental conditions
Experiments were conducted in June 2021 at the Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment (DAFE), University of Pisa (43.704672° N, 10.427292° E). Ten 4-year-old trees each of A. altissima (Mill.) Swingle (AI), P. × acerifolia (Aiton) Willd. (PL) and T. platyphyllos Scop. (TI) with green leaves, and P. cerasifera Ehrh. var. pissardii (PR) and A. platanoides L. cv. Crimson King (AC) with red leaves were selected and divided into two groups: one group was kept in direct sun (L); the other group was kept in the shade (~ 10 μmol m–2 s–1; S) to adapt for 1 week before analyses. Trees were kept well-watered throughout the trials. For each tree, a mature leaf was selected, marked and its pigment levels were monitored throughout a 24-h period. The experiment was done twice, with similar results, and a representative data set is reported herein.
Pigment detection
Leaf chlorophyll content was measured, and flavonol and anthocyanin indexes were developed using the leaf-clip sensor DUALEX® (Force-A, Orsay, FR). On 30 June, the content in each leaf (n = 5) was measured between dawn (5:41 GMT) and dusk (21:02 GMT) (i.e. 6:30, 9:00, 10:30, 12:00, 13:30, 15:00, 16:30, 18:00, 19:30 and 21:00). The 50 values (5 measurements/time × 10 times) obtained for each pigment were averaged.
Spectral light quality
At the same time that pigments were measured, spectral quality, light intensity and colour were measured with a portable spectrophotometer (SpectraPen mini, PSI, Drásov, CZ) calibrated for visible light (340 to 850 nm).
Statistical analysis
The 10 means for a pigment were analysed for significant differences over time using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the daily sampling time as a source of variation. When a significant difference was found, the means were separated by a post hoc Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test (p = 0.05). Homoscedasticity of data was tested using Bartlett’s test. The normality of data was tested using D’Agostino & Pearson test. Differences between values for sun and shade were analyzed using an unpaired t-test. Linear regressions between photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) values and DUALEX® chlorophyll contents (Chl) were performed; then, R2 and the p-value were established. All statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA).
Results
Chlorophyll variations
Differences in leaf color between sun- (L) and shade-adapted (S) plants were evident (Fig. 1). Chl content was always significantly higher in the S-plants regardless of species or the species leaf color (+ 23.5, + 24.4, + 84.3, + 42.5 and + 101.5% in AI, AC, TI, PR and PL, respectively; Table 1).
Circadian variations in chlorophyll from 6:30 to 21:00 in L- and S-plants are reported in Fig. 2. Although Chl levels in L-plants generally yielded a flatter curve than that for Chl in shade-adapted leaves, no general trend was observed among L-plants. Red-leafed AC-L and PR-L and the green-leafed PL-L had a significant increase in Chl content at dusk, but levels in green-leafed AI-L and TI-L did not differ significantly across the 10 sampling times. Moreover, in PR-L leaves, Chl values at 9:00 and at 15:00 were significantly lower than at dawn, similar to the trend in S-plants. In the shade, Chl levels had a similar pattern among plants species (Fig. 2). In comparison to values obtained at dawn, Chl values in S-leaves were lowest in the early morning (9:00) and at midday (2:00 and 15:00), and highest at dusk (21:00) (Fig. 2b, d, f, h). This trend was found in each S-plant species (except for PL-S, Fig. 2j).
Flavonol variations
The differences in the flavonol index (Flv) values in the S-plants compared to the L-plants were species-dependent (Table 1). In AI-S and TI-S plants, the Flv index increased by ~ 10%, whereas in AC-S, TI-S and PL-S plants, the Flv index decreased with relative to that for the L-plants (–10.1, 4.3 and 18.6%, respectively).
Circadian Flv trends differed in plant species in relation to L and S treatments (Fig. 3). In AC-L leaves, Flv values varied significantly during the day, showing a decrease at 15:00 and then rose until dusk (Fig. 3c). A similar trend was observed also for PL-L leaves, with the lowest values at 9:00, 12:00 and 15:00 with respect to those at dawn and dusk (Fig. 3i). The Flv values in AI-L, TI-L and PR-L leaves did not vary during the day (Fig. 3a, e, g). In each S-species analyzed, the Flv index did not vary during the day (Figs. 3b, d, f, h, j).
Anthocyanin variations
Anthocyanin index (Anth) was undetectable in acyanic leaves, and significant differences emerged between the two red-leafed species in the L and S treatments (Table 1). Anth values were much lower in S- than in L-plants (–43.7 in AC, -62.1% in PR). In both red-leafed species, regardless of treatment, the Anth values did not show any significant rhythmicity throughout the day (Fig. 4).
Diurnal light variations
During the day, the light intensity varied among L and S treatments (Table 2). The PAR values were highest from 12:00 to 15:00 in L conditions (~ 1630 μmol m–2 s–1) and from 10:30 to 18:00 (~ 10 μmol m–2 s–1) in S conditions (Table 2).
Relationship between PAR and Chl content
The linear regression analyses between Chl values and relative daily PAR for the L- and S-plants indicated that there was no linear relation for almost all the plants analyzed (Figs. 5a–c, f, h–j). Only for PR-L, PL-L and AC-S was a significant relation found (R2: 0.59, 0.69 and 0.51, respectively; p = 0.009, 0.003, 0.02, respectively; Figs. 5d, e, g).
Discussion
Light quantity and quality influenced the leaf pigment content
Light is well known to have a pivotal role in plant development and rhythmicity. Light signals are perceived by photoreceptors and transduced to the regulatory network, affecting multiple plant physiological traits (Rugnone et al. 2013). Leaf chlorophyll content is a well-accepted reference system to investigate the physiological response of plants to different environmental constraints (Sharma et al. 2020).
Low light conditions induce leaves to optimize their light absorption effectiveness by increasing chlorophyll content per surface unit (Lichtenthaler et al. 1981; Wittmann et al. 2001; Tang et al. 2015). In these experiments, the increase in Chl contents detected in all the shaded species demonstrated the dynamic ability of plants to maximize the light-harvesting capacity in low light. On the other hand, the lower Chl contents detected in the sun-adapted tree leaves is likely aimed to prevent possible photoinhibition of photosynthesis under excessive light, especially around midday (Jason et al. 2004; Dai et al. 2009; Hu et al. 2021).
The synthesis of flavonoids, and in particular, flavonols (e.g., quercetin), in response to increased light radiation (mainly UV-B and blue light) can increase strongly (Agati et al. 2020). Flavonoids, in particular flavonols, are located in different cellular organelles and structures (e.g., vacuoles, cytosol, nucleus, cell wall), and recent pieces of evidence suggest the primary role of these compounds as ROS scavengers instead of a mere light filter (Agati et al. 2007, 2020). In most of the sun-adapted trees analyzed in these experiments (AC, PR and PL), flavonol content was higher than in the shaded counterparts of the same species. However, there was no consistency or dependency between leaf color and flavonol production in the sun, given that two species have red leaves (AC and PR) and one had green (PL). Conceivably, the lack of increase in flavonol content in the sun in the green-leafed AI and TI might be attributable to other biochemical or morphoanatomical features such as the biosynthesis of alternative UV-absorbing/ROS scavenging compounds (Karabourniotis et al. 2020).
Anthocyanins are localized in cell vacuoles and synthesized in different plant organs and tissues (Gould et al. 2008). In the analyzed species (A. platanoides cv. Crimson King and P. cerasifera var. pissardii), anthocyanins are localized in leaf epidermal (adaxial and abaxial epidermis) and mesophyll cells (data not shown). Light (quality and quantity) is one of the key regulators for inducing anthocyanin synthesis in plant organs and tissues (Das et al. 2012). For example, in purple pak-choi plants subjected to low light conditions, enzymes involved in the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway (chalcone synthase, chalcone isomerase and flavanone 3 hydroxylase) are inhibited, causing the purple leaves to turn green (Zhu et al. 2017). Our results are consistent with this decrease in foliar anthocyanins in pak-choi in low light (Zhu et al. 2017). However, since there is a strong link between anthocyanins and leaf sugar content (Das et al. 2012; Lo Piccolo et al. 2020; Ichimura et al. 2021), we cannot exclude that, the very low light conditions in our experiments (Table 2) affected leaf photosynthesis, reducing the available carbon skeletons to synthesize secondary metabolites such as flavonoids involved in plant–environment interactions.
Pigment circadian rhythms in sun and shade
Nondestructive analyses that use spectral wavebands are an effective tool for plant monitoring (including circadian rhythmicity) and provide a broad range of physiological information on plant status (Hoel and Solhaug 1998; Samsone et al. 2007; Pan et al. 2015; Mamrutha et al. 2017). However, Hoel and Solhaug (1998) raised doubts about the efficacy of chlorophyll meters to measure diurnal chlorophyll variations since natural irradiance may affect chlorophyll meter readings. Indeed, Kasahara et al. (2002) increased the light irradiance and observed light-dependent chloroplast movements, which were likely induced to reduce photodamage. These movements, in turn, change the leaf absorbance, and therefore could also affect Chl values obtained from the chlorophyll meter (Hoel and Solhaug 1998). However, our data indicated either no significance or very low significance (only in PR and PL) in the relation between PAR and Chl content measured with the leaf-clip sensor in sun-adapted leaves (Fig. 5).
Moreover, in the present experiment, the results from S-plants grown at a maximum PAR of ~ 10 μmol m–2 s–1 and those from those shaded individuals disentangled this potential problem. Therefore, we can reasonably assume that the instrument used in the analyzed species was not influenced by diurnal variation in light irradiance in the current study. Our findings are in accordance with Mamrutha et al. (2017), reported that the chlorophyll meter used in the present study provided reliable chlorophyll values for monitoring leaf chlorophyll. The use of the nondestructive DUALEX® meter allowed us, for the first time, to “live” monitoring of simultaneous changes in chlorophyll, flavonol and anthocyanin circadian rhythms.
Molecular studies in A. thaliana have shown that multiple levels of regulation modulate the biosynthesis of chlorophylls. Transcriptome profiles showed that chlorophyll biosynthetic genes could be grouped into different gene clusters based on their response to light and circadian clock rhythms (Matsumoto et al. 2004; Kobayashi and Masuda 2019). Molecular regulation of the genes leads to the rhythms of chlorophyll biosynthesis, downregulating synthesis at night and upregulating synthesis during the day (Kobayashi and Masuda 2019). Our results agree with previous molecular analyses that suggest chlorophyll is not synthesized at night because no increase in chlorophyll was detected at dawn in any analyzed species. Moreover, chlorophylls undergo a continuous daily breakdown/biosynthesis turnover, which can be adjusted to accommodate external light conditions and fluctuations (Matile et al. 1999; Hu et al. 2021). When chlorophyll turnover is at a steady-state, no changes in chlorophyll content are detected due an equilibrium between chlorophyll anabolism and catabolism (Matile et al. 1999). Therefore, we hypothesize that the trends in leaf chlorophyll content, detected especially in shade-adapted leaves, can be explained by a different rate in chlorophyll biosynthesis and degradation during the whole day. These trends were less visible in sun-exposed leaves, probably because the higher light conditions compared to the shading of the S-leaves, reduced the chlorophyll content, masking the increased values registered for the shaded counterparts during the late afternoon.
The circadian regulation of primary metabolism has been extensively studied, but work on the circadian regulation of secondary metabolism, such as flavonoid metabolism, is still limited (Thain et al. 2002; Soengas et al. 2018). Working with different plant species, Gori et al. (2020) and Veit et al. (1996) reported that the total flavonoid content increased during the central hours of the day, probably to reduce the potential oxidative stress due to excessive light. However, our experiments unveiled very few changes in daily flavonol levels, with the flavonol indices at dawn similar to those at dusk (Fig. 3). The almost unchanging daily trend in the flavonol index in all the analyzed tree species suggests that light conditions during the day were not so excessive that antioxidants were transiently induced in the plants.
Although anthocyanins showed no significant daily trends in levels in red-leafed plants in both L and S, their presence indirectly influenced the content and daily variation in chlorophylls. In our study, in both red-leafed species species, sun-exposed leaves had higher Chl values than those in all the green-leafed species (Table 1; P < 0.0001, Student’s t-test). The daily trend in chlorophyll levels in sun-exposed leaves of PR was very similar to that obtained for the shaded counterpart; they were significantly lower at 9:00 and 15:00 than those at dawn (Fig. 2). Not by chance, among the red-leafed species, PR-L had highest values for the Anth index (Table 1; P < 0.0001, Student’s t-test). Indeed, anthocyanins absorb mostly in the visible green spectrum (520–560 nm) with an appreciable absorbance in blue wavebands (450–490) (Landi et al. 2021). Furthermore red-leafed species usually have several shade-like traits (e.g., reduced leaf thickness, higher chlorophyll content and lower chlorophyll a/b ratio), suggesting that the presence of epidermal anthocyanins can induce the so-called “shade syndrome” (Manetas et al. 2003; Hughes et al. 2014; Tattini et al. 2014; Landi et al. 2021). Therefore, in our experiment, the sunscreen effect exerted by anthocyanins, partially “shadowing” mesophyll cells, has likely induced the behavior of shaded leaves in sun-exposed red leaves to, at least in terms of Chl daily rhythmicity.
Conclusions
Our results support the use of non-destructive analyses to measure trends in chlorophyll, flavonol and anthocyanin pigment content. The DUALEX® provides a rapid, non-invasive, robust and reliable assessment of pigment indexes, which can be applied in various branches of plant science. Chlorophyll contents and daily variations were influenced by light conditions and anthocyanin presence. Conversely, flavonol daily rhythms did not change significantly. This study provides the basis for further investigations related to pigment rhythmicity in plants, a hot topic in plant physiology, ecology and applied plant sciences such as plant breeding to improve plant fitness in sunny and shady environments.
References
Agati G, Matteini P, Goti A, Tattini M (2007) Chloroplast-located flavonoids can scavenge singlet oxygen. New Phytol 174:77–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.01986.x
Agati G, Brunetti C, Fini A, Gori A, Guidi L, Landi M, Sebastiani F, Tattini M (2020) Are flavonoids effective antioxidants in plants? twenty years of our investigation. Antioxidants 9:1098. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9111098
Barak S, Tobin EM, Green RM, Andronis C, Sugano S (2000) All in good time: the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Trends Plant Sci 5(12):517–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01785-4
Boardman NK (1977) Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 28:355–377. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.28.060177.002035
Cao KF (2000) Leaf anatomy and chlorophyll content of 12 woody species in contrasting light conditions in a Bornean heath forest. Can J Bot 78(10):1245–1253
Chazdon RL, Pearcy RW (1991) The importance of sunflecks for forest understory plants. Bioscience 41(11):760–766
Covington MF, Maloof JN, Straume M, Kay SA, Harmer SL (2008) Global transcriptome analysis reveals circadian regulation of key pathways in plant growth and development. Genome Biol 9(8):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2008-9-8-r130
Dai YJ, Shen ZG, Liu Y, Wang LL, Hannaway D, Lu HF (2009) Effects of shade treatments on the photosynthetic capacity, chlorophyll fluorescence, and chlorophyll content of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg. Environ Exp Bot 65(2–3):177–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.12.008
Das PK, Shin DH, Choi SB, Park YI (2012) Sugar-hormone cross-talk in anthocyanin biosynthesis. Mol Cells 34:501–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10059-012-0151-x
Dodd AN, Salathia N, Hall A, Kévei E, Tóth R, Nagy F, Hibberd JM, Millar AJ, Webb ARR (2005) Plant circadian clocks increase photosynthesis, growth, survival, and competitive advantage. Science 309:630–633. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1115581
García-Plazaola JI, Fernández-Marín B, Ferrio JP, Alday JG, Hoch G, Landais D, Milcu A, Tissue DT, Voltas J, Gessler A, Roy J, Resco de Dios V (2017) Endogenous circadian rhythms in pigment composition induce changes in photochemical efficiency in plant canopies. Plant Cell Environ 40:1153–1162. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12909
Gori A, Nascimento LB, Ferrini F, Centritto M, Brunetti C (2020) Seasonal and diurnal variation in leaf phenolics of three medicinal mediterranean wild species: what is the best harvesting moment to obtain the richest and the most antioxidant extracts? Molecules 25:956. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040956
Gould PD, Diaz P, Hogben C, Kusakina J, Salem R, Hartwell J, Hall A (2009) Delayed fluorescence as a universal tool for the measurement of circadian rhythms in higher plants. Plant J 58:893–901. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03819.x
Gould K, Davies KM, Winefield C (2008) Anthocyanins: biosynthesis, functions, and applications. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, NY
Harmer SL, Hogenesch JB, Straume M, Chang HS, Han B, Zhu T, Wang X, Kreps JA, Kay SA (2000) Orchestrated transcription of key pathways in Arabidopsis by the circadian clock. Science 290(5499):2110–2113. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5499.2110
Hoel BO, Solhaug KA (1998) Effect of irradiance on chlorophyll estimation with the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter. Ann Bot 82:389–392. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1998.0683
Hu XY, Gu TY, Khan I, Zada A, Jia T (2021) Research progress in the interconversion, turnover and degradation of chlorophyll. Cells 10:31–34. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10113134
Hughes N, Carpenter KL, Keidel TS, Miller CN, Waters MN, Smith WK (2014) Photosynthetic costs and benefits of abaxial versus adaxial anthocyanins in Colocasia esculenta ‘Mojito.’ Planta 240:971–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-014-2090-6
Ichimura K, Niki T, Matoh M, Nakayama M (2021) High temperature under low light conditions suppresses anthocyanin biosynthesis in snapdragon petals associated with decreased sugar levels. Sci Hort 290:110510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110510
Inoue K, Araki T, Endo M (2018) Circadian clock during plant development. J Plant Res 131:59–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-017-0991-8
Griffin JJ, Ranney TG, Pharr DM (2004) Photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and carbohydrate content of Illicium taxa grown under varied irradiance. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 129(1):46–53
Karabourniotis G, Liakopoulos G, Nikolopoulos D, Bresta P (2020) Protective and defensive roles of non-glandular trichomes against multiple stresses: structure–function coordination. J for Res 31:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-019-01034-4
Kasahara M, Kagawa T, Oikawa K, Suetsugu N, Miyao M, Wada M (2002) Chloroplast avoidance movement reduces photodamage in plants. Nature 420:829–832. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01213
Khan S, Rowe SC, Harmon FG (2010) Coordination of the maize transcriptome by a conserved circadian clock. BMC Plant Biol 10:126. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-126
Kobayashi K, Masuda T (2019) Transcriptional control for the chlorophyll metabolism. Adv Bot Res 91:133–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.abr.2019.03.001
Landi M, Tattini M, Gould KS (2015) Multiple functions of anthocyanins in plant-environment interactions. Environ Exp Bot 119:4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.05.012
Landi M, Agati G, Fini A, Guidi L, Sebastiani F, Tattini M (2021) Unveiling the shade nature of cyanic leaves: a view from the “blue absorbing side” of anthocyanins. Plant Cell Environ 44:1119–1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13818
Lee J, Kang MH, Kim JY, Lim PO (2021) The role of light and circadian clock in regulation of leaf senescence. Front Plant Sci 12:669170. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.669170
Lichtenthaler HK, Buschmann C, Döll M, Fietz HJ, Bach T, Kozel U, Meier D, Rahmsdorf U (1981) Photosynthetic activity, chloroplast ultrastructure, and leaf characteristics of high-light and low-light plants and of sun and shade leaves. Photosynth Res 2:115–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028752
Lo Piccolo E, Landi M, Massai R, Remorini D, Guidi L (2020) Girled-induced anthocyanin accumulation in red-leafed Prunus cerasifera: effect on photosynthesis, photoprotection and sugar metabolism. Plant Sci 294:110456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110456
Mamrutha HM, Sharma D, Kumar KS, Venkatesh K, Tiwari V, Sharma I (2017) Influence of diurnal irradiance variation on chlorophyll values in wheat: A comparative study using different chlorophyll meters. Natl Acad Sci Lett 40(3):221–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-017-0544-7
Lo Piccolo E, Landi M (2021) Red-leafed species for urban “greening” in the age of global climate change. J Forestry Res 32:151–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-020-01154-2
Manetas Y, Petropoulou Y, Psaras GK, Drinia A (2003) Exposed red (anthocyanic) leaves of Quercus coccifera display shade characteristics. Funct Plant Biol 30:265–270. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP02226
Matile P, Hörtensteiner S, Thomas H (1999) Chlorophyll degradation. Annu Rev Plant Biol 50(1):67–95. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.67
Matsumoto F, Obayashi T, Sasaki-Sekimoto Y, Ohta H, Takamiya K, Masuda T (2004) Gene expression profiling of the tetrapyrrole metabolic pathway in Arabidopsis with a mini-array system. Plant Physiol 135(4):2379–2391. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.042408
Nakamichi N (2020) The transcriptional network in the Arabidopsis circadian clock system. Genes 11(11):1284. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11111284
Pan WJ, Wang X, Deng YR, Li JH, Chen W, Chiang JY, Yang JB, Zheng L (2015) Nondestructive and intuitive determination of circadian chlorophyll rhythms in soybean leaves using multispectral imaging. Nature 5:11108. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11108
Rugnone ML, Soverna AF, Sanchez SE, Schlaen RG, Hernando CE, Seymour DK, Mancini E, Chernomoretz A, Weigel D, Más P, Yanovsky MJ (2013) LNK genes integrate light and clock signaling networks at the core of the Arabidopsis oscillator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:12120–12125. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302170110
Samsone I, Andersone U, Vikmane M, Ieviņa B, Pakarna G, Ievinsh G (2007) Nondestructive methods in plant biology: an accurate measurement of chlorophyll content by a chlorophyll meter. Acta Univ Latviensis 723:145–154
Schmid VHR (2008) Light-harvesting complexes of vascular plants. Cell Mol Life Sci 65:3619–3639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-008-8333-6
Sharma A, Kumar V, Shahzad B, Ramakrishnan M, Sidhu GPS, Bali AS, Handa N, Kapoor D, Yadav P, Khanna K, Bakshi P, Rehman A, Kohli SK, Khan EA, Parihar RD, Yuan H, Thukra AK, Bhardwaj R, Zheng B (2020) Photosynthetic response of plants under different abiotic stresses: a review. J Plant Growth Regul 39:509–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-019-10018-x
Soengas P, Cartea ME, Velasco P, Francisco M (2018) Endogenous circadian rhythms in polyphenolic composition induce changes in antioxidant properties in Brassica cultivars. J Agric Food Chem 66:5984–5991. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01732
Tang H, Hu YY, Yu WW, Song LL, Wu JS (2015) Growth, photosynthetic and physiological responses of Torreya grandis seedlings to varied light environments. Trees 29:1011–1022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-015-1180-9
Tattini M, Landi M, Brunetti C, Giordano C, Remorini D, Gould KS, Guidi L (2014) Epidermal coumaroyl anthocyanins protect sweet basil against excess light stress: multiple consequences of light attenuation. Physiol Plant 152:585–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12201
Thain SC, Murtas G, Lynn JR, McGrath RB, Millar AJ (2002) The circadian clock that controls gene expression in Arabidopsis is tissue specific. Plant Physiol 130(1):102–110. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.005405
Veit M, Bilger W, Muhlbauer T, Brummet W, Winter K (1996) Diurnal changes in flavonoids. J Plant Physiol 148:478–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(96)80282-3
Wang ZY, Tobin EM (1998) Constitutive expression of the CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) gene disrupts circadian rhythms and suppresses its own expression. Cells 93(7):1207–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81464-6
Wittmann C, Aschan G, Pfanz H (2001) Leaf and twig photosynthesis of young beech (Fagus sylvatica) and aspen (Populus tremula) trees grown under different light regime. Basic Appl Ecol 2(2):145–154
Zhu H, Li X, Zhai W, Liu Y, Gao Q, Liu J, Ren L, Chen H, Zhu Y (2017) Effects of low light on photosynthetic properties, antioxidant enzyme activity, and anthocyanin accumulation in purple pak-choi (Brassica campestris ssp Chinensis Makino). PLoS ONE 12(6):e0179305
Funding
The project cost was not covered by a financed project Original.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.com.
Corresponding editor: Tao Xu.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lo Piccolo, E., Lauria, G., Bongi, G. et al. Differences in pigment circadian rhythmicity in green- and red-leafed tree species in the sun and shade. J. For. Res. 34, 693–704 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-022-01528-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-022-01528-8