Abstract
Summary
Bisphosphonates are a first-line treatment for osteoporosis but require adequate renal function. We estimated the prevalence of renal impairment among osteoporotic women in Israeli. Approximately 2.3 % of women had renal impairment at a level that makes them inappropriate for bisphosphonate use, demonstrating the need for alternative therapies for osteoporosis treatment.
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to estimate the prevalence of renal impairment among postmenopausal osteoporotic women within a large Israeli health plan.
Methods
This was a retrospective analysis of Maccabi electronic medical records, including Israeli women aged ≥55 with either an osteoporosis diagnosis or osteoporosis-related fracture between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2011. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), which was calculated from the lowest serum creatinine levels reported during the study period, was used to classify stage 1–5 renal impairment: normal ≥90, mild 60–89, moderate 30–59, severe 15–29, and failure <15 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Outcomes were distributions of renal impairment across the study population and stratified by age and osteoporosis-defining event.
Results
A total of 15,608 patients met all eligibility criteria. Patients with stage 1–5 renal function accounted for 25.2, 54.9, 18.5, 1.2, and 0.3 %, respectively, of all patients. Of osteoporotic patients, 2.3 % had eGFR levels (<35 mL/min/1.73 m2) that make them inappropriate for bisphosphonate use. This rate was 1.6 % among patients with an osteoporosis diagnosis and 3.8 % among patients with osteoporosis-related fracture. Within the group of renally impaired patients, older patients were overrepresented. Of the fracture group, patients with hip fractures had a higher prevalence of renal dysfunction (9.3 %) than those having vertebral fractures (3.2 %) or other fractures (2.0 %).
Conclusions
Among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, 2.3 % had renal impairment which makes them inappropriate for bisphosphonate use in Israel.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Osteoporosis is estimated to affect 200 million women worldwide [1, 2]. In one 2003 study of osteoporosis in Israel, approximately 25 % of women 60 years or older self-reported having osteoporosis [3]. The prevalence of osteoporosis increases after menopause because estrogen withdrawal accelerates the rate of bone remodeling, during which more bone is resorbed than replaced [4]. The major clinical manifestation of osteoporosis is fracture, particularly of the hip, which has a considerable negative impact on both the quality of life and the economics of osteoporotic individuals [5].
A number of pharmacologic therapies are available to treat osteoporosis, including bisphosphonates, estrogen, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), and denosumab [6]. Bisphosphonates, which inhibit bone resorption, are the most commonly used agents for the treatment of osteoporosis [7]. However, because bisphosphonates are cleared by the kidneys, their use requires adequate renal function [8]. Treatment options for osteoporotic patients with severe renal impairment are limited, since all bisphosphonates are not recommended in this population; however, there are variations in the lower limit of creatinine clearance below which a therapy is not recommended: alendronate and zoledronic acid <35 mL/min, ibandronate and risedronate <30 mL/min, and zoledronic acid <40 mL/min. Renal function is typically assessed by estimating glomerular filtration rate, which can be accomplished using different equations, such as the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation, the Cockcroft-Gault equation, and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula. Regardless of the equation used, renal dysfunction is generally defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 [9]. Renal dysfunction of any severity occurs in 23 to 36 % of the general elderly population (age ≥64 years) [9], with increased prevalence among women compared with men, regardless of age [9].
Not only is the prevalence of renal impairment high among older women, but osteoporosis is also a well-known complication of chronic kidney disease [10], a condition common to the aging population. This association between kidney disease and osteoporosis is due to an imbalance between bone formation and resorption in patients with renal impairment [10]. Thus, it is not surprising that renal impairment is a significant issue for a substantial proportion of women with osteoporosis. Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2008 study, which was conducted in the USA, demonstrated that 25 % of the 9914 women surveyed had moderate to severe osteoporosis and 4.3 % of the 693 women with osteoporosis would be inappropriate for bisphosphonate therapy (i.e., glomerular filtration rate <35 mL/min) [11]. These data can be extrapolated to 12.7 million American women with moderate to severe osteoporosis and 439,000 osteoporotic women who would be contraindicated for bisphosphonate therapy [11]. Limited data have been published demonstrating the prevalence of renal impairment among women with osteoporosis in Israel.
The objective of the current study was to estimate the prevalence of renal impairment among osteoporotic women from a large health plan in Israel overall and by patient characteristics (i.e., age group, fracture occurrence, and body mass index [BMI]).
Methods
Data source
Data for this analysis were obtained from the Maccabi Healthcare Services (MHS) database, which comprises the electronic medical records (EMRs) of all patients from the MHS health maintenance organization (HMO), a large health plan in Israel that currently covers 2.0 million lives (i.e., approximately 25 % of the Israeli population) [12].
Study design
This was a retrospective analysis of the Maccabi EMR database of claims from January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2011. The study population was defined using the following eligibility criteria: (1) any physician diagnosis of osteoporosis (International Classification of Diseases code 9 (ICD-9): 733.0X) or any osteoporosis-related fracture (see Appendix A), (2) female gender, (3) ≥55 years of age at osteoporosis-defining event (osteoporosis diagnosis or fracture), and (4) continuous enrollment in MHS health plan beginning at least 1 year before and continuing at least 1 year after the osteoporosis-defining event. The ICD-9 codes used to identify osteoporosis-related fractures are supported by an algorithm for identifying fractures attributable to osteoporosis in claims databases [13]. To exclude patients with cancer-related pathologic fractures, otherwise-eligible patients who had a fracture but no osteoporosis diagnosis were excluded if they were also present in the Maccabi cancer registry.
The following data were extracted from the records of all eligible patients: the osteoporosis-defining event, age and date of the osteoporosis-defining event, and the minimum serum creatinine level (Scr), assessed as the lowest Scr at any point from 1 year before through 1 year after the osteoporosis-defining event. If there were more than one medical record with osteoporosis diagnosis during the study period, the first event was used, and if an osteoporosis diagnosis and osteoporosis-related fracture occurred on the same date, the event was classified as a diagnosis.
The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the CKD-EPI formula [14]:
Renal impairment stage was classified using the CKD-EPI renal impairment staging system [14], as shown below:
-
Stage 1 (normal) = eGFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2
-
Stage 2 (mild) = eGFR 60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2
-
Stage 3 (moderate) = eGFR 30–59 mL/min/1.73 m2
-
Stage 4 (severe) = eGFR 15–29 mL/min/1.73 m2
-
Stage 5 (failure) = eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 or dialysis
Outcomes and statistics
The outcomes analyzed were the distributions of renal impairment across the entire study population and by age, osteoporosis-defining event (osteoporosis diagnosis or fracture), and BMI. Confidence intervals were computed for the estimates of the age and event-specific percent prevalence, using WINPEPI software [15].
Results
Patient sample and baseline characteristics
Of the 20,747 female patients aged ≥55 years with an osteoporosis-defining event between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2011, a total of 15,608 patients met all the eligibility criteria (Fig. 1). Approximately one third (31.9 %) of patients had a fracture as their osteoporosis-defining event. The mean age (± standard deviation [SD]) of those patients with fracture as their osteoporosis-defining event was 66.9 ± 9.5 and 65.7 ± 7.9 years for those with an osteoporosis diagnosis as their osteoporosis-defining event; approximately one third of the patients in both categories were at least 70 years old (Table 1). Over one third (37.8 %) of the patients with fracture were obese, compared with 28.4 % of the patients with an osteoporosis diagnosis.
Overall renal impairment
Within the entire study population with eGFR levels or on dialysis, most patients (80.1 %) had either normal (stage 1) eGFR levels or mild (stage 2) renal impairment (Fig. 2). Within the 18.5 % of patients with stage 3 (moderate) disease, most had eGFR levels that are considered appropriate for bisphosphonate use (40–59 mL/min/1.73 m2) [6], whereas 1.3 % of the total population had borderline levels that may not be considered acceptable for bisphosphonate use (35–39 mL/min/1.73 m2) and 0.8 % had levels that contraindicated bisphosphonate use (Table 2). An additional 1.5 % of patients had stage 4 (severe) renal impairment, had stage 5 renal failure, or were already on dialysis. Taken together, 2.3 % of osteoporotic patients who had eGFR levels recorded in their EMRs were contraindicated from taking bisphosphonates (Fig. 2).
Renal impairment by age and osteoporosis-defining event
Among the 10,628 patients with osteoporosis diagnosis as their defining event, 1.6 % were contraindicated for bisphosphonate use. Within that group of 173 renally impaired patients, older patients outnumbered younger patients by more than 4:1 (139 vs 34 patients) (Table 2). Among the 4980 patients with fracture as their osteoporosis-defining event, 3.8 % were contraindicated for bisphosphonate use. Within that group of 187 renally impaired patients, older patients outnumbered younger patients by more than 3:1 (144 vs 43 patients). Of the fracture group, 15.1 % had hip fractures, 8.7 % had vertebral fractures, and the remaining 76.3 % had other fractures. Among those with hip fractures, 9.3 % were contraindicated for bisphosphonates, as were 3.2 % of those with vertebral fractures and 2.0 % of those with other fractures.
Renal impairment by BMI
A total of 1.7 % of patients in the normal weight range had renal impairment severe enough to contraindicate them for bisphosphonate use, followed by those who were overweight (1.9 %), those who were obese (2.9 %), and those who were underweight (3.1 %) (Fig. 3). The most severe renal impairment (stage 5 or dialysis) occurred in 0.2 to 0.5 % of patients across weight categories.
Discussion
These results demonstrated that nearly 75 % of the postmenopausal, Israeli women in the study had some level of renal dysfunction; moreover, 2.3 % of the women with recorded eGFR levels were inappropriate for bisphosphonate use based on renal impairment (<35 mL/min/1.73 m2) and another 1.3 % of osteoporotic women had borderline levels that may contraindicate them for bisphosphonates (35–39 mL/min/1.73 m2). When these patients were divided by type of osteoporosis-defining event, it was revealed that the fracture group had more than double the proportion of patients with renal impairment contraindicating bisphosphonate use than the diagnosis group (3.8 vs 1.6 %). This is consistent with the characterization of patients with fractures as having a poorer health-related quality of life than those with a diagnosis of osteoporosis in the absence of a fracture [16]. Moreover, patients with hip fractures had a threefold to fourfold greater proportion of patients who were contraindicated for bisphosphonates due to renal impairment compared with patients with vertebral or other fractures. This serves to illustrate the need for an alternative for bisphosphonate therapy among this patient group.
In the current study, age was correlated with renal impairment; in both the diagnosis group and the fracture group, patients ≥70 years of age had more than triple the patients contraindicated for bisphosphonates than did the younger patients. This is consistent with a known decline in renal function with age [17]. In comparison of the percentage of patients who were contraindicated for bisphosphonates among the different BMI categories, the normal weight range had the lowest percentage (1.7 %), whereas those categories at the extremes (obese and underweight) had the highest percentages (2.9 and 3.1 %, respectively). This is consistent with previous studies reporting that obesity is associated with increased renal dysfunction [18, 19]. Although obesity has long been believed to provide protection against osteoporosis, recent evidence shows that obesity is associated with an increased fracture risk at certain skeletal sites [20]. Thus, there may be an interaction among obesity, renal function, and osteoporosis that could not be fully examined in this descriptive study.
The NHANES 2005–2008 study, a representative sample of the US population, assessed renal impairment based on 693 women with osteoporosis [21]; the estimates in the current study are based on a sample of 15,608 Israeli women with osteoporosis from an EMR database representing approximately 25 % of the Israeli population. In the NHANES study, women aged ≥50 were classified by both bone mineral density and eGFR, and it was reported that 4.3 % of osteoporotic women had eGFR levels <35 mL/min. This is somewhat higher than the 2.3 % rate reported in the current study, a difference that may be explained by study design differences. Whereas the current study measured age at diagnosis (mean age = 66.7 years), the NHANES study reported on women who currently had osteoporosis, who would be expected to have a higher mean age. In fact, the NHANES study included 52 % (363/693) of osteoporotic women who were at least 70 years old, compared with only 32 % (5043/15,608) of these women in the current study. Furthermore, the NHANES study measured bone mineral density as part of the study in order to determine which patients had osteoporosis, and it undoubtedly categorized women as osteoporotic who had been previously undiagnosed. In contrast, the current study included only women who had a record of an osteoporotic fracture or osteoporosis diagnosis during routine medical care, a more stringent requirement for defining osteoporosis. Moreover, the NHANES study used the older MDRD equation to determine eGFR, which modestly overestimates renal impairment compared with the CKD-EPI formula used in the current study. Finally, the current study excluded patients with <1 year of follow-up, which would exclude patients who died less than 1 year after diagnosis or fracture. Regardless of the details, both studies identified a modest percentage of osteoporotic women who are contraindicated for bisphosphonate use due to renal impairment, which translates into millions of women in need of non-bisphosphonate treatment for their osteoporosis.
In a review article examining the relationship between kidney failure and cardiovascular risk, Vanholder and colleagues reported that approximately 335,000 Americans (0.09 % of the total population) have stage 5 renal impairment [22]. This prevalence rate is lower than the 0.3 % stage 5 disease observed in the current study, and it may be a function of population differences, such as the inclusion of both men and women in the American prevalence data and differences in ethnicity and comorbidity.
The current study has a number of limitations, including the fact that contemporaneous creatinine results were not available for 2493 patients who otherwise would have been included in this study. As a retrospective observational analysis, we cannot be sure why some patients did not have creatinine tests performed, although most missing values came from women with fractures, where further inquiry is not obligatory. A total of 5139 patients were excluded because they did not have either sufficient follow-up time and/or a contemporaneous creatinine measurement. These excluded patients tended to be older, have lower BMI, and have a higher rate of prior fractures than patients retained in the study sample. Thus, the patients included in this study may not be fully representative of the overall Maccabi population. The current study also utilized age ≥55 as a cutoff for postmenopausal status; while this is commonly used in osteoporosis studies [23, 24], it is an imperfect surrogate. However, >90 % of women by age 55 are menopausal or postmenopausal, and by age 60, nearly 100 % of women are postmenopausal [25]. Renal function was classified by minimal Scr level over the study period and subsequent conversion to eGFR level, which is simply a surrogate of renal function. However, it is an appropriate measure for this study, since eGFR is used to determine contraindication to bisphosphonates [6]. It is also possible that some patients with vertebral fractures were not included in this study since vertebral fractures are often undiagnosed [26]. While it would have been interesting to assess interactions between age and fractures on renal insufficiency, multivariable analyses were not within the scope of this descriptive study. This study was also not designed to examine osteoporosis as a contributing factor to renal impairment, nor does it account for women with severe renal impairment who may not have been assessed for osteoporosis due to a focus on the clinical management of renal impairment.
Results from this study showed that, among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, approximately 2.3 % had renal impairment at a level that contraindicated them for bisphosphonate use. This proportion increased for those who were older (age ≥70) and for those who had osteoporosis-related fracture, particularly hip fracture. Thus, renal failure is an important factor in therapeutic choice for these patients. In addition, several risk factors for renal impairment are modifiable, including proteinuria, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and hyperuricemia [27], suggesting that, as a population, the prevalence of renal impairment could be reduced by addressing these risk factors. Beyond that, however, patients with impaired renal function that contraindicates them for bisphosphonates need alternate methods to manage their osteoporosis.
References
Kanis JA (2007) WHO Scientific Group Technical Report. Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health care level. Available at: http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/pdfs/WHO_Technical_Report.pdf. Accessed November 11, 2013
Cooper C (1999) Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 9(Suppl 2):S2–S8
Werner P (2003) Self-reported prevalence and correlates of osteoporosis: results from a representative study in Israel. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 37:277–92
Seeman E (2003) Invited review: pathogenesis of osteoporosis. J Appl Physiol (1985) 95:2142–51
Dontas IA, Yiannakopoulos CK (2007) Risk factors and prevention of osteoporosis-related fractures. Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 7:268–72
National Osteoporosis Foundation (2014) Clinician’s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Washington, DC: National Osteoporosis Foundation
Hollick RJ, Reid DM (2011) Role of bisphosphonates in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis: an update on recent safety anxieties. Menopause Int 17:66–72
Miller PD (2011) The kidney and bisphosphonates. Bone 49:77–81
Zhang QL, Rothenbacher D (2008) Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in population-based studies: systematic review. BMC Public Health 8:117
Hruska KA, Mathew S, Lund R (2008) Osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease: lessons from chronic kidney disease. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 5:35–39
Lubwama R, Nguyen A, Modi A, Diana C, Miller PD (2014) Prevalence of renal impairment among osteoporotic women in the USA, NHANES 2005-2008: is treatment with bisphosphonates an option? Osteoporos Int 25:1607–15
Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics. Population statistics. Available at: http://www.cbs.gov.il/publications13/yarhon1113/pdf/b1.pdf. Accessed December 6, 2013
Warriner AH, Patkar NM, Curtis JR, Delzell E, Gary L, Kilgore M, Saag K (2011) Which fractures are most attributable to osteoporosis? J Clin Epidemiol 64:46–53
Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF III, Feldman HI, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van LF, Greene T, Coresh J (2009) A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 150:604–12
Abramson JH (2004) WINPEPI (PEPI-for-Windows): computer programs for epidemiologists. Epidemiol Perspect Innov 1:6
Palacios S, Neyro JL, de Fernandez CS, Chaves J, Rejas J (2014) Impact of osteoporosis and bone fracture on health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women. Climacteric 17:60–70
Glassock RJ, Winearls C (2009) Ageing and the glomerular filtration rate: truths and consequences. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 120:419–28
Bonnet F, Deprele C, Sassolas A, Moulin P, Alamartine E, Berthezene F, Berthoux F (2001) Excessive body weight as a new independent risk factor for clinical and pathological progression in primary IgA nephritis. Am J Kidney Dis 37:720–727
Kambham N, Markowitz GS, Valeri AM, Lin J, D’agati VD (2001) Obesity-related glomerulopathy: an emerging epidemic. Kidney Int 59:1498–509
Gonnelli S, Caffarelli C, Nuti R (2014) Obesity and fracture risk. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 11:9–14
Klawansky S, Komaroff E, Cavanaugh PF Jr, Mitchell DY, Gordon MJ, Connelly JE, Ross SD (2003) Relationship between age, renal function and bone mineral density in the US population. Osteoporos Int 14:570–576
Vanholder R, Massy Z, Argiles A, Spasovski G, Verbeke F, Lameire N (2005) Chronic kidney disease as cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Nephrol Dial Transplant 20:1048–56
Adachi JD, Adami S, Gehlbach S, Anderson FA Jr, Boonen S, Chapurlat RD, Compston JE, Cooper C, Delmas P, Diez-Perez A, Greenspan SL, Hooven FH, LaCroix AZ, Lindsay R, Netelenbos JC, Wu O, Pfeilschifter J, Roux C, Saag KG, Sambrook PN, Silverman S, Siris ES, Nika G, Watts NB (2010) Impact of prevalent fractures on quality of life: baseline results from the global longitudinal study of osteoporosis in women. Mayo Clin Proc 85:806–13
Chiang CH, Huang CC, Chan WL, Huang PH, Chen TJ, Chung CM, Lin SJ, Chen JW, Leu HB (2012) Oral alendronate use and risk of cancer in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a nationwide study. J Bone Miner Res 27:1951–58
Murabito JM, Yang Q, Fox C, Wilson PW, Cupples LA (2005) Heritability of age at natural menopause in the Framingham Heart Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:3427–30
van den Berg M, Verdijk NA, van den Bergh JP, Geusens PP, Talboom-Kamp EP, Leusink GL, Pop VJ (2011) Vertebral fractures in women aged 50 years and older with clinical risk factors for fractures in primary care. Maturitas 70:74–79
Roesli RM (2005) Renal dysfunction and its risk factors. Acta Med Indones 37:59–60
Acknowledgments
This analysis was funded by Merck & Co., Inc. Editorial assistance in the preparation of this manuscript was provided by Jennifer Klem, PhD, Klem Medical Communications, LLC.
Conflicts of interest
Jingbo Yu is an employee of Merck & Co., Inc. Inbal Goldshtein has no disclosures. Varda Shalev has no disclosures. Gabriel Chodick has no disclosures. Sophia-Ish Shalom has received research grants and consulting, advisory board, and lecture fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme Co. Ltd. Ofer Sharon is an employee of Merck Sharp & Dome Co. Ltd. Ankita Modi is an employee of Merck & Co., Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOCX 22 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, J., Goldshtein, I., Shalev, V. et al. Renal impairment among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis from a large health plan in Israel. Arch Osteoporos 10, 8 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-015-0210-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-015-0210-y