1 Introduction

The extracellular enzymes produced by microorganisms play an important role in the biogeochemical cycles of nutrients in aquatic ecosystems, contributing to the remineralization of organic matter, specifically macromolecular debris (Arnosti et al., 2014; Egli & Janssen, 2018). For the degradation of macromolecular debris into assimilable substrates, heterotrophic microorganisms release enzymes into the environment through active secretion or cell lysis (Arnosti et al., 2011; Sinsabaugh & Shah, 2012). Among the enzymes produced by microorganisms are phosphatases, which release soluble inorganic phosphate from organophosphates, making it available to most organisms (Jackson et al., 2013).

There are three groups of hydrolytic enzymes responsible for the hydrolysis of organic phosphorus, phosphosterases (mono and diesterase), nucleotidases, and nucleases (exo and endonuclease) (Chróst & Siuda, 2002; Torres et al., 2017). Phosphomonoesterases (PMEase) are non-specific enzymes that hydrolyze simple phosphomonoesters and can be produced by different microorganisms. Furthermore, depending on the pH at which they exhibit their maximum activity, they can be divided into two groups: acidic (pH 2.6–6.8) and alkaline (7.6–10) (Torres et al., 2017). Although it is suggested that both enzymes are regulated by the availability of orthophosphate, acid PMEase (hereinafter acid phosphatases) are usually considered constitutive enzymes whose synthesis is related to phosphorus concentration and demand within the cell (Jasson et al., 1988; Siuda, 1984). In freshwater ecosystems, acid phosphatases (AcP) have been less studied compared to alkaline phosphatases, possibly due to the high number of systems with neutral pH where the preservation of AcP enzyme activity could be affected (Siuda, 1984). Due to this, the activity of AcP has hardly been investigated in freshwater ecosystems with different trophic states where the pH is neutral or slightly alkaline. Studies carried out in freshwater lakes with different pH in Japan (Tabata et al., 1988) showed that in systems with neutral pH, the activities of acid and alkaline phosphatases were similar. Therefore, both enzymes show activity in these systems although they do not exhibit their maximum activity (Jasson et al., 1988).

On the other hand, research on the factors that affect phosphatase activity in freshwater ecosystems have focused more on the analysis of the factors that affect the activity of alkaline phosphatase in the water column and sediment and the activity of acid phosphatase (AcPA) in sediments of acidotrophic freshwater ecosystems (Huang & Morris, 2003; Torres et al., 2017) and little attention has been paid to AcPA in the water column of ecosystems with neutral or slightly alkaline pH. Taking these aspects into account, we hypothesize that in contaminated freshwater ecosystems where the pH is neutral or slightly alkaline, AcPA will be more influenced by polluting factors (e.g., phosphate concentration, organic matter) compared to less impacted systems where AcPA will depend on natural conditions (e.g., precipitation, pH, phytoplankton activity).

In the present study, two freshwater ecosystems from western Cuba were analyzed: Almendares River (polluted ecosystem from Havana) and San Juan River (non-polluted ecosystem from Artemisa province). Both rivers present a mineralogy dominated by rock formations rich in calcium, which affects the basicity and the high alkalinity of the river water (Olivares-Rieumont et al., 2005; Peña et al., 2001). However, different polluting sources are discharged into the Almendares River from foundries, landfills, factories that produce paintings, electronics, untreated wastewater, etc. (Cabrera et al., 2012), which could contribute punctually to the decrease of the pH in the places where they are dumped (anthropogenic acidification). Weyhenmeyer et al. (2019) state that with the addition of strongly acidic anions such as sulfates, the carbonate buffer system (i.e., alkalinity) of water bodies is depleted and positive ions begin to leak from the soils into the waters without being compensated due to alkalinity, causing a decrease in pH. Under these contamination conditions that could affect the pH of the medium, the determination of acid phosphatase activity can shed light on how microorganisms present in these ecosystems can adapt to the new conditions and carry out the process of releasing soluble phosphates from organophosphates.

The objective of this study is to determine the acid phosphatase activity (AcPA) in the Almendares and San Juan rivers (western Cuba) and its relationship with physicochemical and microbiological indicators.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study area and sampling

To analyze the AcPA at Almendares and San Juan rivers, sampling was done on February, April, June, and October during the year 2017 at three sampling stations in each river. The sampling stations in the Almendares River were Río Cristal (RC) (23° 01′ 59.99″ N, 82° 24′ 03.77″ E), Paila (P) (23° 03′ 23.94″ N, 82° 24′ 09.75″ E), and Puente de Hierro (PH) (23° 07′ 36.55″ N, 82° 24′ 40.22″ E) (Online Resource 1)(Larrea et al., 2014). In the San Juan River, the sampling stations were Presa El Palmar (S-1) (22° 50′ 42.35″ N, 82° 56′ 23.33″ E), Presa San Juan (S-2) (22° 50′ 46.01″ N, 82° 56′ 27.09″ E), and Baños del San Juan (S-3) (22° 49′ 24.02″ N, 82° 55′ 35.08″ E) (Online Resource 2)(Romeu et al., 2015a). The samples were taken in the morning at a distance of one meter from the shore and 15 cm deep. The samples were transferred to the laboratory in sterile plastic bottles of 500 mL in a refrigerator (4 °C) and were processed in a period of less than 12 h (AFNOR, 2009).

2.2 Determination of physicochemical and microbiological indicators

Determination of temperature, pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids (TDS), dissolved oxygen, nutrients (PO43−-P, NH4+-N, NO2-N, NO3-N), chemical oxygen demand (COD), and bacterial indicators (Escherichia coli, enterococci, and thermotolerant coliforms) are described in Izquierdo et al. (2020).

2.3 Calculation of the nutrient pollution index

The nutrient pollution index (NPI) was calculated according to Isiuku and Enyoh (2020), using the formula:

$$NPI=\frac{{C}_{N}}{{MAC}_{N}}+\frac{{C}_{P}}{{MAC}_{P}}$$

where CN/P is the average concentration of nitrate and phosphate in the water body, MACN/P is the maximum allowable concentration taken from W.H.O. (2003) which is 10 mg.L−1 and 0.1 mg.L−1 for nitrate and phosphate in recreational waters respectively. According to the NPI values, the waters can be classified as NPI < 1 (no pollution), NPI de 1 ≤ 3 (moderated polluted), NPI > 3 ≤ 6 (considerable polluted), and NPI > 6 (very high polluted).

2.4 Calculation of N:P ratio

The nitrate-to-phosphate ratio was used to determine the limiting nutrient pattern in the water bodies evaluated according to Wemedo et al. (2021). It was determined by dividing the nitrate concentration by the phosphate concentration. The results were interpreted based on the Redfield ratio (Redfield, 1958), as N:P ratio < 16 = nitrate limitation, while N:P ratio > 16 = phosphate limitation.

2.5 Determination of acid phosphatase activity

Total acid phosphatase activity was determined colorimetrically using p-nitrophenyl phosphate as substrate according to the methodology of Asaduzzaman et al. (2011) with modifications. Assays were performed in triplicate and a negative control was used for each sample to assess the development of enzymatic non-color. The reaction mixture was prepared in 15 mL corning tubes and consisted of 1.5 mL of citrate buffer (0.05 M pH 4.8), 1.5 mL of 1 mM p-nitrophenyl phosphate (final concentration 0.3 mM), and 1.5 mL of water sample. The reaction mixture was incubated at 37° C for 10 min. To stop the reaction, 0.5 mL of reaction mixture was added to a tube containing 4.5 mL of NaOH (0.02 M) and the absorbance at 410 nm was read in a spectrophotometer. The units of AcPA were expressed as μmol of p-nitrophenol produced per milliliters of sample per minute.

2.6 Statistical analysis

To determine the existence of significant differences among sampling stations and sampling months in each river related to AcPA, the normal distribution and homogeneity of variance of the data were verified using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Cochran-Bartlett tests, respectively. Non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test (p < 0.05) was subsequently applied. To evaluate the correlation among the physicochemical indicators, the indicators of faecal contamination and AcPA, the Spearman non-parametric linear correlation test was performed. Statistical analyses were carried out in the Statistica version 8.0 program (StatSoft, 2007).

3 Results

3.1 Physicochemical and microbiological characteristics of the Almendares and San Juan rivers

The physicochemical and microbiological water quality of the Almendares and San Juan rivers in February–October 2017 can be seen in Izquierdo et al. (2020) and Online Resource 3. In general, the temperature in Almendares River and San Juan River was 24.3–30.9 °C and 22.7–28.4 °C, respectively. The pH was slightly basic in both ecosystems (6.58–7.97, Almendares River and 6.98–8.52, San Juan River). The concentrations of nitrate, nitrite, ammonium, phosphate, total dissolved solid, E. coli, thermotolerant coliforms, and enterococci were always higher in the Almendares River compared with the San Juan River (p < 0.01). The Paila station in the Almendares watershed was the most polluted according to the results of bacterial indicators of fecal contamination, ammonium, and dissolved oxygen concentrations. The PH station is under the influence of the tide, which induces water movement that is probably responsible for the oxygen concentration increase at the PH station compared to the upstream stations. In the San Juan River, the Baños del San Juan station was the most impacted station, from the anthropogenic point of view, compared with the other two sampling stations on the river.

3.2 NPI in Almendares and San Juan rivers

The nutrient pollution index for each sampling station of the Almendares and San Juan rivers, as well as the annual mean in each river, is presented in Table 1. All the sampling stations of the Almendares River are considered very high polluted. The Paila station presented the highest pollution values followed by Puente de Río and Río Cristal.

Table 1 Nutrient pollution indices (NPI) in the sampling stations of the Almendares and San Juan rivers in the period February–October 2017

In the case of the San Juan River, the Presa El San Juan and Baños del San Juan sampling stations only in the month of April were considered very high polluted and considerable polluted, respectively. Presa El Palmar station in June, Presa San Juan in February, June, and October, and the Baños del San Juan station in June were considered no polluted. The rest of the time, the Presa El Palmar and Baños del San Juan stations were considered moderately polluted. In a general sense, the Almendares River is classified as a very high polluted ecosystem and the San Juan River as a moderately polluted ecosystem.

3.3 N:P ratio in Almendares and San Juan rivers

Table 2 shows the nitrate-to-phosphate ratios in the Almendares and San Juan rivers stations, as well as the annual mean in each ecosystem. In the Almendares River, with the exception of the Río Cristal station in February, which presented a phosphate limitation (N:P ratio > 16); all stations were limited by nitrate (N:P ratio < 16). The lowest values were obtained at the Paila station, followed by Puente de Hierro and Río Cristal. In the San Juan River, with the exception of the Presa El San Juan station in April, which presented a limitation due to nitrate (N:P ratio < 16); all stations were limited by phosphate (N:P > 16). The highest values were obtained at the Presa El San Juan station in February (9444) and Presa El Palmar station in October (1062). In general, the Almendares River presented a nitrate limitation during the study period and the San Juan River presented a phosphate limitation.

Table 2 N:P ratio in the sampling stations of the Almendares and San Juan rivers in the period February–October 2017

3.4 Acid phosphatase activity and its relationship with physicochemical and microbiological indicators of water quality

In Almendares River, potential acid phosphatase activity (AcPA) showed significant differences between the sampling months in each sampling station and between the river sampling stations in each of the sampled months (Fig. 1). AcPA values were found between 0 and 0.025 μmol.mL-1 min-1. Enzyme activity was detected in all the sampling stations with the exception of the Río Cristal station in April. In the month of October, the highest AcPA values were presented in the three sampling stations (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, in June, the lowest values were obtained in all stations (p < 0.05). The Puente de Hierro sampling station showed the highest enzyme activity values in the month of October (p = 0.043) and February (p = 0.037) compared to the rest of the sampling stations.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Acid phosphatase activity in the sampling stations of the Almendares River during the period February–October 2017. Capital letters indicate significant differences between the sampling months in the same sampling station. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences between the sampling stations in the same sampling month according to the Mann–Whitney U test (p < 0.05)

Potential AcPA positively correlated with the COD (p < 0.01) and with the concentration of nitrates (p < 0.05) in the Almendares River, but it did not significantly correlate with the rest of the physicochemical and microbiological indicators of water quality, the NPI, and the N:P ratio (Table 3).

Table 3 Spearman’s correlations among acid phosphatase activity, the physicochemical and microbiological indicators, the NPI and the N:P ratio determined in Almendares and San Juan rivers in the period February–October 2017

In San Juan River, potential AcPA showed significant differences between the sampling months in each sampling station and between the river sampling stations in the months of February, June, and October (Fig. 2). AcPA values were found between 0 and 0.018 μmol.mL-1 min-1. In a general sense, enzymatic activity was detected in all sampling stations with the exception of the Presa San Juan and Baños del San Juan stations in the month of February and in the month of April for the three stations. In the month of February, the highest AcPA value was obtained at the Presa El Palmar station (p = 0.037), followed by the Presa San Juan station in the month of October (p = 0.034) and the Baños del San Juan station in the months of June and October (p = 0.043). Meanwhile, in April, the lowest values were obtained in all stations (p < 0.05).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Acid phosphatase activity in the San Juan River sampling stations during the period February–October 2017. Capital letters indicate significant differences between the sampling months in the same sampling station. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences between the sampling stations in the same sampling month according to the Mann–Whitney U test (p < 0.05)

Potential AcPA positively correlated with chlorophyll a (p < 0.05), the N:P ratio (p < 0.05), the concentration of E. coli (p < 0.05), and the concentration of total heterotrophs (p < 0.01) and negatively correlated with the pH (p < 0.01) and the NPI (p < 0.05) (Table 3).

When the AcPA values obtained in the Almendares and San Juan rivers during the dry and rainy periods were compared (Fig. 3), it was observed that the highest values were obtained in the Almendares River in both periods (p < 0.05). However, the existence of significant differences between the dry period and the rainy period was only evidenced in the San Juan River (p = 0.000329).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Acid phosphatase activity in the Almendares and San Juan rivers during the dry and rainy seasons in 2017. Capital letters indicate significant differences between the rivers in the dry period (A and B). Greek letters indicate significant differences between rivers in the rainy season (α and β). Lowercase prime letters indicate significant differences between dry and rainy seasons in the San Juan River. The same lowercase letters indicate the non-existence of significant differences in Almendares River according to the Mann–Whitney U test (p < 0.05)

4 Discussion

4.1 NPI and N:P ratio in Almendares and San Juan rivers

The nutrient pollution index (NPI) takes into account the possible summative effects of nitrate and phosphate concentration on environmental health, allowing the estimation of water quality (Isiuku & Enyoh, 2020). According to the NPI values obtained in the present study, the Almendares River is ratified as a very high polluted ecosystem (Table 1), which is in accordance with previous research carried out in this ecosystem using different physicochemical and microbiological indicators and the water quality index (Arpajón et al., 2011; Izquierdo et al., 2020; Romeu et al., 2015b) (Online Resource 3). The values obtained in this ecosystem are higher than those obtained by Isiuku and Enyoh (2020) in water bodies of southeastern Nigeria. The Almendares River is located in the province of Havana and receives little or no treatment wastewater of domestic and industrial origin from the city that contributes to the pollution of the ecosystem (Romeu et al., 2015b). The high phosphate concentrations determined in the Almendares River (see Izquierdo et al. (2020) and Online Resource 3 for values of physicochemical and microbiological indicators) contributed to the high NPI values obtained in this study.

In the case of the San Juan River, the NPI indicated that this is a moderately polluted ecosystem (Table 1), which is in correspondence with previous studies carried out in this river (Izquierdo et al., 2020; Larrea et al., 2021). The San Juan River is located in the province Artemisa, in the “Sierra del Rosario” Biosphere Reserve, where it does not receive the same anthropogenic impact as the Almendares River because it is in a rural area where there is no presence of industries. In April, the highest NPI values were obtained at the Presa el San Juan and Baños del San Juan stations, classifying them as very high polluted and considerably polluted respectively. This result is in correspondence with the water quality index values reported by Izquierdo et al. (2020) for these two stations. The month of April constitutes one of the months that are within the dry season in Cuba. In particular, the province Artemisa (western Cuba) was one of the most affected areas with the greatest deficit in accumulated rainfall according to the spatial analysis carried out by the Institute of Meteorology (INSMET, 2018) in the dry season. Drought and increased temperature are factors that can cause the concentration of nutrients in water bodies (Roy et al., 2014) and thus affect water quality.

According to Redfield (1958), during phytoplankton growth, the N:P ratio should be equal to 16: 1. The N:P values obtained in the present study in the Almendares and San Juan rivers are not in correspondence with that observed by Redfield. In the Almendares River, phosphate concentrations are higher than nitrate concentrations, with a limitation due to nitrate. In the San Juan River, the opposite occurs, detecting a phosphate limitation (Table 2). The nitrate limitation conditions found in the Almendares River are associated with the anthropogenic activities carried out in this ecosystem, the low concentrations of dissolved oxygen and high concentrations of phosphate (Izquierdo et al., 2020) and possibly due to denitrification (Isiuku & Enyoh, 2020; Wemedo et al., 2021). All of which leads to the eutrophication conditions that this river presents (Arpajón et al., 2011). In the San Juan River, the limitation by phosphate implies higher concentrations of nitrate, less addition of phosphates from polluting sources, and therefore, less risk of eutrophication and better water quality (Izquierdo et al., 2020; Larrea et al., 2021).

These results show the usefulness of the NPI and the N:P ratio in evaluating water quality in aquatic ecosystems and should be used in conjunction with the water quality index to provide more complete information on the characteristics of the surface waters.

4.2 Acid phosphatase activity detected in the waters of Almendares and San Juan rivers

Potential acid phosphatase activity (AcPA) during the study period in the Almendares and San Juan rivers showed significant differences between the sampling sites and the sampling months (Figs. 1 and 2), showing spatial–temporal variability in both ecosystems. These results are in agreement with studies carried out in different aquatic systems, such as lakes (Patel et al., 2018; Tabata et al., 1988), rivers (Pandey & Yadav, 2017; Patel et al., 2018), estuaries (Labry et al., 2016), mangroves (Luo et al., 2017), and seas (Ivancic et al., 2009), where the phosphatases activity (acid and/or alkaline) in the water column or sediment has been analyzed. In Cuba, there are two marked seasons, which are the dry season (November to April) and the rainy season (May to October). Because Cuba is a tropical country and due to climate change, the temperatures in both periods (dry and rainy season) are not very different. In particular, the 2011–2020 decade has been the warmest compared to all the preceding decades for which measurements are available (Fonseca et al., 2021). In the present study, two months corresponding to the dry season (February and April 2017) and two months corresponding to the rainy season (June and October 2017) were analyzed, where the temperature values in the Almendares River ranged between 24.3 and 30.9 °C and in the San Juan River between 22.7 and 28.8 °C. In studies carried out by Larrea et al. (2020), it shows that the bacterial communities in the Almendares and San Juan rivers differ among the months of samplings analyzed by these authors (February, April, June, July 2013) and that these variations are related to the high fecal contamination in the Almendares River and with the high concentrations of dissolved oxygen, rainfall, and low fecal contamination in the San Juan River. On the other hand, Arnosti et al. (2014) argued that the magnitude, nature, and distribution of extracellular enzymes activities reflect differences in organic matter composition, quantity, and consumption in relation to microbial community diversity and growth. For all this, even when the incubation conditions for the determination of acid phosphatase activity (AcPA) have been carried out at 37 °C regardless of the sampling month, seasonal changes are reflected.

In both, the Almendares River and the San Juan River, the highest AcPA values were obtained in the month of October in almost all the stations. This month marks the end of the rainy season in Cuba and was characterized by the presence of abundant rainfall (INSMET, 2018). In addition, in the San Juan River, the highest activities were found in the rainy season compared to the dry season (Fig. 3), which is in correspondence with the results reported by Giraldo et al. (2014) who obtained the highest phosphatase values in the rainy period in the Aburra-Medellín River in Colombia. Different researchers have suggested that during the rainy season the extracellular enzymatic activity increases as a result of the dilution of nutrients, which become less available to the microorganisms present in the waters. These microorganisms must synthesize enzymes to obtain nutrients from the organic matter available (Giraldo et al., 2014; Jaramillo et al., 2016; Tiquia, 2011). On the other hand, in dry periods, there is an accumulation of nutrients that can be used by heterotrophic microorganisms, producing a decrease in the enzymatic activity (Cunha et al., 2010; Tiquia, 2011).

In the Almendares River, despite obtaining the highest potential activity values in October, no significant differences were observed between the rainy season and the dry season, which may be due to the high levels of contamination by organic matter that reach the river from the discharges of domestic and industrial origin and from animal husbandry, throughout the year (Arpajón et al., 2011; Romeu et al., 2015b). In addition, AcPA positively correlated with COD (Table 3), which is an indicator of organic matter. This suggests that high levels of contamination could maintain high levels of enzymatic activity, which is in correspondence with the results obtained by Jaramillo et al. (2016) who found that there was a correlation between COD and phosphatase activity in the Aburra-Medellín River in Colombia. Previously, it has been reported that contamination with sewage and sediments can constitute a source of alkaline phosphatase activity (Nedoma et al., 2006; Zhou et al., 2004) and could also constitute a source of AcPA considering that many microorganisms present in wastewater can produce both enzymes, as was demonstrated by Larrea et al. (2018) in isolates from Almendares River. The Puente de Hierro station on the Almedares River showed the highest AcPA values, which correlated with the COD and the nitrate concentration (Table 3). This station is located in the river estuary where a greater arrival of nutrients occurs with the entry of the tides and with the discharge of the freshwater ecosystem. In addition, the mixture of fresh river water with sea water causes the flocculation of fine suspended matter in large particles, and on the other hand, the action of the tides also causes the resuspension of the particles (Sigee, 2005); contributing to the increase of organic matter and therefore to the increase in enzymatic activity. High values of alkaline phosphatase activity in the presence of high concentrations of organic matter and high concentrations of phosphates in estuaries have been fundamentally attributed to the presence of particles associated bacteria according to studies carried out in the Aulne and Elorn estuaries in the Northeast France (Labry et al., 2016); conditions that occurred in all the stations of the Almendares River.

The fact that the highest AcPA values have been obtained in the Almendares River with respect to the San Juan River may be due to the high values of organic matter found in the Almendres River and the slightly alkaline pH observed in the San Juan River (Izquierdo et al., 2020) (Online Resource 3). Particularly, an increase in enzyme activity in the water column has been detected in streams with more intensive human land use (Williams et al., 2012) as is the case of Almendares River. In the San Juan River, pH correlated negatively with the AcPA, where fundamentally, in the months of February and April, values of pH > 8 were obtained (Izquierdo et al., 2020). At these pH values, the activity of acid phosphatases is practically null because their activity occurs at pH 2.6–6.8 (Torres et al., 2017). In the San Juan River, a negative correlation between the AcPA and the nutrient pollution index was also observed. The San Juan River is an ecosystem located in the Sierra del Rosario Biosphere Reserve, which is not exposed to the same pollutant load as the Almendares River because it is in a rural environment. In addition, this Reserve constitutes a mountainous ecosystem where abundant rainfall occurs that tends to dilute the pollutants present in the waters. Thus, the microorganisms present in the river waters, faced with a lower availability of nutrients, must synthesize extracellular enzymes to obtain the nutrients from the available organic matter (Cunha et al., 2010).

Moreover, in the San Juan River, the AcPA positively correlated with chlorophyll a, the concentration of Escherichia coli, the concentration of total heterotrophs and the N:P ratio. This result suggests that both bacteria and phytoplankton present in this ecosystem are responsible for the production of acid phosphatase activity under phosphate-limited conditions, which is in correspondence with previous studies that have been carried out in different aquatic systems where the activity of alkaline or acid phosphatases has been determined (Labry et al., 2016; Li et al., 2019; Nedoma et al., 2006; Yiyong et al., 2002).

5 Conclusions

Our results show that in freshwater ecosystems with neutral or slightly alkaline pH, potential acid phosphatase activity could be present and also plays an important role in recycling organic matter in these environments. Furthermore, in contaminated freshwater systems, this activity is more influenced by polluting factors (e.g., phosphate concentration, organic matter) compared to less impacted systems where it depends on natural conditions (e.g., precipitation, pH, phytoplankton activity), so acid phosphatase activity in water column could be a good indicator of the anthropogenic impacts on microbial functioning in freshwater ecosystems. Future research should be done to assess whether the observations in this article can be generalized to other aquatic systems. In addition, metaproteomics and metagenomics studies could make it possible to analyze the response of the microbial community to the degradation of organic matter and eutrophication in the freshwater ecosystems in western Cuba.