Abstract
Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of Bacillus spp. from polluted freshwater has been poorly addressed. The objective of this research was to determine the diversity and enzymatic potentialities of Bacillus spp. strains isolated from the Almendares River. Bacilli strains from a polluted river were characterized by considering the production of extracellular enzymes using API ZYM. 14 strains were selected and identified using 16S rRNA, gyrB and aroE genes. Genotypic diversity of the Bacillus spp. strains was evaluated using pulsed field gel electrophoresis. Furthermore, the presence of genetic determinants of potential virulence toxins of the Bacillus cereus group and proteinaceous crystal inclusions of Bacillus thuringiensis was determined. 10 strains were identified as B. thuringiensis, two as Bacillus megaterium, one as Bacillus pumilus and one as Bacillus subtilis. Most strains produced proteases, amylases, phosphatases, esterases, aminopeptidases and glucanases, which reflect the abundance of biopolymeric matter in Almendares River. Comparison of the typing results revealed a spatio-temporal distribution among B. thuringiensis strains along the river. The results of the present study highlight the genotypic and phenotypic diversity of Bacillus spp. strains from a polluted river, which contributes to the knowledge of genetic diversity of Bacilli from tropical polluted freshwater ecosystems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Microorganisms play important roles in all ecosystems, contributing to almost half of the global primary productivity and driving major biogeochemical cycles (Litchman 2010; García-Armisen et al. 2014; Mandic-Mulec et al. 2015). In aquatic ecosystems, bacteria degrade and mineralize organic compounds, passing the reserves of dissolved organic matter to higher trophic levels (Huang et al. 2011; Peter 2011; Castelo-Branco et al. 2016). In this context, important metabolic functions, including degradation of organic matter and assimilation of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus are catalyzed by enzymes produced by microorganisms (Frossard 2011; Yuan et al. 2015; Fabian et al. 2017).
Among bacteria, Bacillus spp. are producers of specific extracellular enzymes, such as proteases, amylases, phosphatases, lipases or esterases. These enzymes are important in biogeochemical cycles of nutrients and also have potential industrial and biotechnological applications. Indeed, it has been suggested that these endospore forming bacteria can contribute to the self-purification of water and therefore may have greater biotechnological potential compared to other bacterial groups (Bal et al. 2009; Geethanjali and Subash 2011; Mandic-Mulec et al. 2015; Mohammad et al. 2017). In particular, the ability of certain Bacillus spp. to produce extracellular enzymes in aquatic systems plays an important role in the decomposition of biopolymers, including proteins, cellulose and other complex carbohydrates.
Moreover, it has been observed that bacterial communities associated with the roots of aquatic macrophytes are key players in recycling of nutrients in aquatic ecosystems. For instance, heterotrophic and epiphytic bacteria from several macrophytes such as Eichhornia crassipes (water hyacinth), Nymphaea lotus (Egyptian water lily) and Pistia stratiotes (water lettuce) can reduce the rate of eutrophication (Haroon and Daboor 2009; Moyo et al. 2013; Yan et al. 2016; Kumar et al. 2017). Yi et al. (2013) suggested that the cultivation of E. crassipes in eutrophic waters can contribute to increase the diversity and abundance of denitrifying bacteria, resulting in a greater release of nitrogen gas through the denitrification process. For this reason, the study of microorganisms that inhabit the roots of aquatic plants can contribute to the recovery of contaminated aquatic ecosystems.
The Almendares River is a polluted ecosystem located in a densely populated area of La Habana, Cuba. This water body receives large amounts of organic matter in the form of domestic and industrial wastes, which are responsible for its eutrophic state (Arpajón et al. 2011), including high heavy metal levels and other contaminants in its sediments (Olivares-Rieumont et al. 2005; Knapp et al. 2012). This is of local concern because the Almendares watershed provides over 47% of La Habana water supply (via groundwater) and contains one of the largest urban parks in Cuba (Arpajón et al. 2011; Graham et al. 2011). This ecosystem has been previously evaluated taking into account microbial and chemical indicators (Arpajón et al. 2011; Romeu et al. 2015). However, little is known about the Bacillus spp. diversity and their potentiality as depollution agent for freshwater ecosystems like the Almendares River. Therefore the objective of this research was to determine the diversity and enzymatic potentialities of Bacillus spp. strains isolated from the Almendares River.
Materials and methods
Sites and sample collection
The samples were collected from three sampling stations in the Almendares River (Río Cristal, Paila and Puente de Hierro) on February, April, June and October 2009. This river located in western part of Cuba, is approximately 45 km in surface area and serves as one of the primary drinking water resource to the Havana metropolitan area. All the sampling stations showed a high degree of eutrophication (Arpajón et al. 2011). Río Cristal (RC) is an upstream station with abundant macrophytes such as E. crassipes (water lilies) and P. stratiotes (water lettuce). The drainage area is characterized by a high proportion of agricultural and cattle lands, which results in a high-nutrient load to the system. Paila (P) is an affluent of the Almendares River and is the most contaminated station with the highest values of thermotolerant coliforms and inorganic nutrients like ammonium, nitrate, nitrite and phosphate (Arpajón et al. 2011; Romeu et al. 2015). The drainage area is characterized by a high proportion of urban areas and the presence of a pharmaceutical laboratory. Puente de Hierro (PH) is located at the river mouth and presents high salinity values; this estuary is also heavily contaminated.
Water samples were collected in 2L sterile plastic bottles placed in a chilled cooler. Plant samples were selected according to the most abundant species at each location. One quadrant of 10 × 10 m at the left riverbank was measured, and the plants located in the corner and in the center of the quadrant were collected (five plants for each species). The selected plants were E. crassipes (RC and PH), P. stratiotes (RC), Cabomba sp. (RC), Commelina sp. (RC and P), Bidens pilosa L. (RC, P and PH) and Hydrocotyle sp. (RC and P). All samples were collected in the morning and processed within 4 h. During the sampling period, the river flow remained low and some of the plants were growing in places originally occupied by river flows.
Isolation from water and rhizosediment
Samples from water were serially diluted from 10−1 to 10−6 in saline solution (NaCl, 0.8%) and spread in Nutrient Agar; 0.1 mL of each dilution was plated in triplicates. Plates were incubated at 30 °C, for 48–72 h. After incubation, representative colony forming units (CFU) displaying different morphologies were isolated and re-streaked on Nutrient Agar plates until purification.
For rhizosediment samples, five plants from the same species in each sampling station were collected and homogenized. The roots with the adhered sediment (rhizosediment) were cut and one gram was diluted in 100 mL of saline solution. Serial dilutions were performed from 10−1 to 10−6 in saline solution and spread in Nutrient Agar. The rhizosediment samples followed the same protocol as the water samples.
To determine the presence of extracellular enzymes, the most frequent bacterial groups from the three sampling stations and the different Almendares River plants, were selected based on their morphological and staining (Gram test) characterization.
Determination of protease and amylase activities
For each isolate, a bacterial suspension of ca. 1 × 108 CFU mL−1 (0.5 Mc Farland unit) was prepared. To determine the proteolytic potential, bacteria were grown in Tryptone Soy Agar (TSA) containing gelatin 1% and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. The plates were then covered with 8–10 mL of Frazier reagent. The non-hydrolyzed gelatin forms a white precipitate with the reagent while hydrolyzed gelatin appears as a clear zone. The enzyme production was assessed as the difference between the diameter (in mm) of the colony and the diameter of the halo (Gorlach-Lira and Coutinho 2007).
To evaluate their amylolytic potential, bacteria were grown in TSA containing 1% of soluble starch and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. 5 mL of iodine solution (1%) was added to the plate and the presence of a colorless halo around the colony indicated amylase secretion. The enzyme production was assessed as the difference between the diameter (in mm) of the colony and the diameter of the halo (Khan et al. 2011).
APY ZYM system assay for enzymatic activity determination
The evaluation of extracellular enzymes production with API ZYM (Biomérieux, France) was carried out with the best isolates in proteases and amylases production. The strips were inoculated following the manufacturer’s instructions and incubated for 4 h and 30 min at 37 °C. After incubation, one drop of ZYM A reagent and one drop of ZYM B reagent were added to each microcupule. Color development was scored as positive and no color development as negative. For microcupule that showed positive results, a value ranging from 1 to 5 (1 = 5 nM; 2 = 10 nM; 3 = 20 nM; 4 = 30 nM; 5 = 40 nM) was assigned according to the color chart provided by the manufacturer.
DNA extraction, PCR amplification and gene sequencing
Bacterial DNA was extracted using the SDS-phenol-chloroform method (Eichner et al. 1999). The PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene was performed using 50 µL of the reaction mixture, containing 25 µL of PCR Master (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Germany), a finale concentration of 0.5 µM of each universal primer 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-GTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) (Zhou et al. 2009), 5 µL of template DNA and 15 µL of Milli Q water. After an initial 5-min denaturation step at 94 °C, samples were amplified during 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 55 °C and 90 s at 72 °C. The last cycle was followed by a final 5 min elongation at 72 °C.
The gyrB gene was amplified with the primer pair gyrB-F2 (5′-ACWCGTATGCGTGARYTRGC-3′) and gyrB-R2 (5′-CCTTGYTTTGCWGAWCCDCC-3′) (Soufiane and Côté 2009) and the primer pair gyrF (5′-AATAATAACTTTATGATAGCGT-3′) and gyrR (5′-CGGTGGCGGTTACAAAGTTTC-3′) (Swiecicka et al. 2008) for the strains belonging to the Bacillus cereus group. After an initial 5-min denaturation step at 94 °C, DNA was amplified for 30 cycles at a denaturing temperature of 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 51 °C for 30 s, extension at 68 °C for 30 s and a final extension at 68 °C for 7 min. The aroE gene was amplified with primer pair aroE F1/R1: aroE F1 (5′-ATCGGAAATCCAATTGGACA-3′) and aroE R1 (5′-CCTGTCCACATTTCAAAYGC-3′) (Soufiane and Côté 2009) for the strains belonging to the B. cereus group. DNA was amplified for 30 cycles at denaturing temperature of 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 47 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 60 s.
The amplified PCR fragments of the 16S rRNA, gyrB and aroE genes were sequenced, aligned and analyzed using both NCBI GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) (Altschul et al. 1990) and Ribosomal Database Project (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu) (Cole et al. 2009). The bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 1000 replicates was used to construct the dendrogram of similarity. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted in MEGA5 (Tamura et al. 2011). Sequence data from this study were deposited in GenBank under the accession number KF910733, KF910744, KF910745, KF910748, KF910755–KF910764, KY113140–KY113149 and KY283086–KY283095.
Evaluation of proteinaceous crystal production
To discriminate Bacillus thuringiensis among members of the B. cereus group, the presence of proteinaceous crystalline inclusions were determined using the method described by Santana et al. (2008).
Pulse field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of chromosomal DNA of Bacillus sp.
The low-melting-point agarose (Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO) embedded chromosomal DNA was prepared from 6 h cultures according to Gaviria-Riviera and Priest (2003). The plugs were digested with 30 U of NotI (MBI Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania) in 250 µL of the buffer following the manufacturer’s protocol for 16 h at 37 °C. PFGE was performed with the CHEF-DR II System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) at 14 °C and 5.6 V cm−1, using 1.0% (w/v) agarose gel in 0.5× TBE (100 mM Tris, 100 mM borate, 200 mM EDTA). The electrophoresis was carried out for 26 h, with a pulse from 3 to 90 s. After staining with ethidium bromide solution (1 µg mL−1) the gels were analyzed with the BioCaptMW version 99.05 s system (Vilber Lourmat, Marine-La-Vallee, France). Yeast Chromosome PFG Marker and Lambda Ladder PFG Marker (New England BioLabs, Massachusetts, USA) were used as mass markers according to Swiecicka and Mahillon (2006). The PFGE pattern was analyzed using Gel Compare II version 6.0 (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium).
Presence of virulence genetic determinants of B. cereus group
The detection of virulence genetic determinants was performed by PCR using the primers and thermocycling parameters described in Online Resource 1. PCR amplifications were carried out using a C1000 Thermal Cycler (Biorad, Winninglaan, Temse). Final reaction mixtures (20 µL) contained approximately 70 ng total DNA template, 1× PCR buffer (Promega 5× Green GoTaq Reaction Buffer), 200 µM of each dNTP, 1.5 µM of MgCl2, 1 µM each of forward and reverse primers and 0.02 units GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel. B. cereus strain Kinrooi 5975c (Dierick et al. 2005) was included as a reference in the PCR assays to detect the virulence genetic determinants nheA, clo, hbl, em1, ces and cer. The genetic determinants nheA, clo, hbl, correspond to the subunit A of non-hemolytic enterotoxin, cerolysin O and hemolysin BL, respectively. The last three virulence genetic determinants (em1, ces and cer) correspond to emetic toxin synthesis-related genes. In the case of cytK1 and cytK2, coding for the two variants of cytolysin K (CytK), Bacillus cytotoxicus LMG 26718T was used as a reference strain for cytK1, while strain B. cereus strain Kinrooi 5975c was used as control for cytK2. SmartLadder (Eurogentec, Liège, Belgium) was used as a molecular mass marker. Gels were analyzed with the BioCaptMW version 99.05 s system (Vilber Lourmat, Marine-La-Vallee, France).
Results
Morphological characterization of bacterial isolates
Based on morphological and staining characteristics, bacterial isolates of the Almendares River were classified into four groups as shown in Table 1. Gram-positive rod-shaped endospore-forming bacteria predominated in both water and rizhosediment samples. From the total of Gram-positive rod-shape endospore-forming bacteria, 64 isolates (42 from rizhosediment and 22 from water samples) were selected for the evaluation of their extracellular enzyme activities.
Extracellular enzyme activity
The production diameters of proteases and amylases obtained from plant rhizosediment and water isolates respectively, are shown in Online Resource 2 and Online Resource 3. From the 64 isolates, 60 displayed protease activity and 48 showed amylase activity. The 36 best protease and amylase producers (24 from rhizosediment and 12 from water samples) were retained for the determination of others enzymes production by API ZYM.
Distinct profiles of extracellular enzyme activity were observed in water isolates. Alkaline phosphatase, esterase (C 4), esterase lipase (C 8), naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, acid phosphatase, α-glucosidase, leucine aminopeptidase, valine aminopeptidase α-chymotrypsin and β-glucosidase were the enzymes more frequently detected (Fig. 1). None of the water bacteria showed evidence of activity of β-glucuronidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-mannosidase or α-fucosidase. Enzymatic activity profiles of water isolates are shown in Online Resource 4.
In rhizosediment isolates, esterase (C 4), esterase lipase (C 8), naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, alkaline phosphatase, acid phosphatase, valine aminopeptidase, leucine aminopeptidase, β-glucosidase and α-glucosidase were the enzymes more frequently detected (Fig. 2), and none of the rhizosediment isolates showed evidence of β-glucuronidase, α-mannosidase or α-fucosidase activity. Enzymatic activity profiles of rhizosediment isolates are shown in Online Resource 5.
Based on the production of extracellular enzymes (Online Resource 6), the representation of the different sampling stations and collected plants of the Almendares River and their different micro-morphological and cultural characteristics, 14 isolates (9 from rhizosediment and 5 from water samples) were selected for further analysis.
Identification of Bacillus spp. strains
The molecular identification of the strains is shown in Online Resource 7. BLAST analysis of the 16S rRNA sequences indicated that 10 strains belong to the B. cereus group, two to B. megaterium, one to B. pumilus and one to B. subtilis.
Further discrimination between the ten B. cereus s.l. strains was obtained by sequencing and comparing their gyrB and aroE genes. Bootstrapped neighbor-joining trees were constructed based on the aligned sequences. The best discrimination among the strains was obtained with the aroE gene, as shown in Fig. 3. In this case, the analysis showed two groups at 95% nucleotide sequence identities, where the 10 B. cereus sensu lato strains clustered with B. thuringiensis serovar kurstaki strain HD1, as compared to a group of reference strains.
As shown in Fig. 4, the presence of crystalline inclusions in sporulated cultures of the 10 B. cereus sensu lato strains identified them as B. thuringiensis.
Analysis of the diversity of Bacillus spp. strains by PFGE
The diversity of the 14 Bacillus spp. strains was also characterized by PFGE analysis. The genomic DNA of the Bacillus spp. strains was analyzed with NotI restriction enzyme, which yielded three to five fragments within the B. thuringiensis strains, nine different fragments for B. subtilis, 11 for B. pumilus and 12 for B. megaterium PailaP1c (Fig. 5). Using a similarity threshold of 70%, a total of eight distinct pulsotypes were observed. Particularly, within the B. thuringiensis strains, four pulsotypes were observed (clusters A to C, and the singleton PH52). Moreover, all the strains of cluster A and cluster C, as well as the strains PH2 and RC9 from cluster B, could not be differentiated, which suggests the possible clonality of the corresponding strains. Interestingly, the strains pertaining to the same clusters were obtained during the same sampling dates (with the exception of 4PaP18 in cluster C); clusters B and C included strains isolated from different sampling stations.
Detection of genetic determinants of potential virulence toxins
Determination of genetic determinants of potential virulence toxins is important to analyze the pathogenicity of the strains isolated from a polluted river. As shown in Table 2, detection of the genetic determinants of cytotoxin K, cereolysin O, non-hemolytic enterotoxin, the emetic toxin (cereulide) and hemolysin BL using PCR, demonstrated that all the strains identified as B. thuringiensis were positive for cytK2, eight for clo and five for nheA. None were positive for cytK1, hbl or the cereulide genetic determinants. The strains of B. megaterium, B. pumilus and B. subtilis did not display any positive PCR reaction suggesting the absence of the corresponding virulence factors. The occurrence patterns of the potential virulence factors matched well with particular pulsotypes (Fig. 5). The only difference among the 4 strains of cluster C was the presence of nheA gene in the 3PHP76 and 4PaP18 strains, while it was absent in the other 2 strains.
Discussion
Microbiota composition varies as a function of water type and depends mainly on salt and organic compound concentration, turbidity, temperature, and contamination sources (Reche and Fiuza 2005; Herfort et al. 2017). In aquatic ecosystems, the most common bacteria are Gram-negative rods (Ramkumar et al. 2011). However, in polluted ecosystems, endospore-forming bacteria have advantages over others bacteria; when conditions are not optimal, endospore formation is triggered. Spores are resistant structures intended to protect and conserve the genetic material of the organisms until the conditions become suitable for vegetative growth (Bueche et al. 2013). In the present study, endospore-forming bacteria were predominant among water and rhizosediment samples of the Almendares River (a polluted ecosystem with high concentrations of organic matter from domestic and industrial wastewater). These observations confirmed those made by Reche and Fiuza (2005) reporting that in aquatic systems polluted with organic compounds and non-treated domestic effluent, Gram-positive bacteria predominate in water and sediments when a culture-dependent approach is used.
The 36 isolates were selected as representative bacteria of the three sample stations of the Almendares River as well as from the different plants collected. For the rhizosediment isolates, although previous isolations from E. crassipes and P. stratiotes have been made (Haroon and Daboor 2009), no previous isolation from Commelina sp., Hydrocotyle sp., Cabomba sp. and B. pilosa L have been reported in Cuba. Association between these microorganisms and their aquatic macrophytes could favor phytoremediation processes due to the potentialities of microorganisms in nutrients solubilizing and plant growth promoting as was suggested by Li and Wong (2011).
The extracellular enzyme activity of the isolates was assessed using API ZYM. The production of phosphatases, esterases, aminopeptidases and glycosyl hydrolases by endospore-forming rods showed the metabolic capabilities associated with the Almendares River isolates and is indicative of the polymeric composition of the sources of organic matter, as previously suggested by Mudryk and Skórczewski (2006).
Phosphatases are the group of phosphohydrolases that most intensively participate in phosphate release in aquatic environments (Cunha et al. 2010). Phosphatases can be present in two forms: alkaline and acid, both able to hydrolyse phosphoric esters (Mudryk and Skórczewski 2006). In the present work, the majority of the endospore-forming rods, identified as Bacillus species, produced from one to three phosphatases. This observation is in agreement with Mudryk and Podgórska (2006), which reported phosphatase-producing capacity in several heterotrophic bacterial genera like Pseudomonas, Chromobacterium, Bacillus or Flavobacterium.
Esterases were also one of the most active extracellular enzymes detected in Almendares River isolates. The isolates showed higher lipolytic activity against short-chain fatty acids, than against lipids with long-chain fatty acids. Other enzymes such as leucine aminopeptidase and valine aminopeptidase were also frequently found among the freshwater isolates. Leucine aminopeptidase is mainly associated with heterotrophic bacteria and hydrolyses a large number of peptides and aminoacid amide of the l-configuration, with particular affinity to l-leucyl-peptides and l-leucyl-amides (Cunha et al. 2010). It has been suggested that the level of leucine aminopeptidase is a good measure of the proteolytic activity of bacteria (Mudryk and Skórczewski 2006), something that was noticed in this work by the evaluation of proteases production. Finally, glycosyl hydrolase activities were present in some of the rhizosediment and water isolates. Tiquia (2011) suggested that the presence of these enzymes is consistent with degradation of plant, animal and microbial detritus. Therefore, these isolates could contribute to decaying matter degradation in the Almendares River, participating in carbon recycling to the biosphere.
The B. cereus s.l. complex comprises seven closely related species: B. cereus sensu stricto, B. anthracis, B. thuringiensis, B. weihensthephanensis, B. mycoides, B. pseudomycoides and B. cytotoxicus (Guinebretière et al. 2013), all sharing 16S rRNA sequence identity higher than 99% (Guinebretiére et al. 2010; Martínez-Blanch et al. 2011; Maughan and Van der Auwera 2011; Økstad and Kolstø 2011; Guinebretiere et al. 2017). However, since B. thuringiensis can be distinguished from the rest of the group by its ability to produce crystal protein inclusions (crystals) during sporulation (Aronson 2002; Santana et al. 2008), the 10 strains belonging to the group B. cereus s.l. could be identified as B. thuringiensis (Fig. 4, Online Resource 7).
B. thuringiensis is an entomopathogenic bacterium used as biopesticide because its toxins are harmless to humans and other mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles and plants and are biodegradable, thus no residual toxic product accumulates in the environment (Bravo et al. 2011; Schneider et al. 2017). This bacterium has therefore been used worldwide for the selective control of mosquito larvae populations (Despres et al. 2011; Fayolle et al. 2015; Schneider et al. 2017). The diversity of the strains tested by PFGE in the present study showed that B. thuringiensis strains were heterogeneous, as was previously reported for this species (Swiecicka et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2014). Comparison of the PFGE typing and the profile of virulence genetic determinants showed only one difference in cluster C, where nheA gene was present in two of the strains of the group but absent in the other two.
According to the spatial distribution of B. thuringiensis clones, all the strains from Río Cristal station harbored the virulence genes cytK2 and clo (3RCP141, 3RCP37b and RC9). These virulence genes were present also in the strains PH2 (clone of RC9) and 4PHP510a (similar to RC9) which came from Puente de Hierro station (10 km downstream from Río Cristal). Hence, this could indicate that some of the strains present in Puente de Hierro station came from the upstream station Río Cristal. Similar results were reported by Rajabi et al. (2011), who analyzed the genetic diversity of Salmonella enterica by PFGE in the Upper Suwannee River, and detected that two genogroups containing 39 and 35 isolates respectively were found in different locations of the river. Casarez et al. (2007) using enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequence polymerase chain reaction (ERIC-PCR) found the same Escherichia coli genotypes in two watersheds separated by 30 km, indicating some level of geographic stability of the E. coli populations from water. The present results suggest a spatial stability of some strains in the main course of the Almendares River.
In the case of the temporal distribution of the B. thuringiensis clones, the clusters showed a separation among the sampling collection date. Cluster A were formed by strains collected on February 2009, cluster B include strains from October 2009 and cluster C was represented by strains isolated on June 2009, with the exception of 4PaP18 collected on October 2009. These observations may be indicative of seasonality in the occurrence of the B. thuringiensis strains. Similar results were reported by Casarez et al. (2007) and Rajabi et al. (2011) who detected a temporal variability of E. coli and Salmonella enterica, respectively, in freshwater sources.
In conclusion, the present study showed the genotypic and phenotypic diversity among Bacillus spp. strains isolated from a polluted river. By the use of microbial source tracking, it was possible to observe the dispersal of the strains across the main stream of the river. However, further analyses to evaluate agricultural input, rainfall, flow rates and other environmental parameters, that may influence microbial diversity of Bacillus spp. strains in polluted freshwater, are needed.
References
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410
Aronson A (2002) Sporulation and δ-endotoxin synthesis by Bacillus thuringiensis CMLS. Cell Mol Life Sci 59:417–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-002-8434-6
Arpajón Y, Romeu B, Rodríguez A, Heydrich M, Rojas N, Lugo D (2011) Impacto de los nutrientes inorgánicos sobre la comunidad bacteriana del río Almendares (Cuba). Higiene y Sanidad Ambiental 11:731–738
Bal S, Mishra RR, Rath B, Sahu HK, Thatoi HN (2009) Characterization and extracellular enzyme activity of predominant marine Bacillus spp. isolated from sea water of Orissa Coast, India Malaysian. J Microbiol 5:87–93
Bravo A, Likitvivatanavong S, Gill SS, Soberón M (2011) Bacillus thuringiensis: a story of a successful bioinsecticide. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 41:423–431
Bueche M et al (2013) Endospore-forming bacteria as an indicator of pollution in sediments of Lake Geneva E3S Web of Conferences 1. https://doi.org/10.1051/.e3sconf/20130133011
Casarez EA, Pillai SD, Di Giovanni GD (2007) Genotype diversity of Escherichia coli isolates in natural waters determined by PFGE and ERIC-PCR. Water Res 41:3643–3648
Castelo-Branco R, Barreiro A, Silva FS, Carvalhal-Gomes SBV, Fontana LF, Mendonça-Filho JG, Vasconcelos V (2016) Bacterial community characterization and biogeochemistry of sediments from a tropical upwelling system (Cabo Frio, Southeastern Brazil). Cont Shelf Res 130:1–13
Chen ML, Chen PH, Pang JC, Lin CW, Hwang CF, Tsen HY (2014) The correlation of the presence and expression levels of cry genes with the insecticidal activities against Plutella xylostella for Bacillus thuringiensis strains. Toxins 6:2453–2470
Cole JR et al (2009) The ribosomal database project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D141-D145. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn879
Cunha A, Almeida A, Coelho FJRC., Gomes NCM, Oliveira V, Santos AL (2010) Bacterial extracellular enzymatic activity in globally changing aquatic ecosystems. Curr Res Technol Educ Top Appl Microbiol Microb Biotechnol 2:124–135
Despres L, Lagneau C, Frutos R (2011) Using the bioinsecticide Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis in mosquito control. In-Tech, Rijeka
Dierick K et al (2005) Fatal family outbreak of Bacillus cereus-associated food poisoning. J Clin Microbiol 43:4277–4279
Eichner CA, Erb RW, Timmis KN, Wagner-Döbler I (1999) Thermal gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of bioprotection from pollutant shocks in the activated sludge microbial community. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:3192–3204
Fabian J, Zlatanovic S, Mutz M, Premke K (2017) Fungal–bacterial dynamics and their contribution to terrigenous carbon turnover in relation to organic matter quality. ISME J 11:415–425
Fayolle S, Bertrand C, Logez M, Franquet É (2015) Does mosquito control by Bti spraying affect the phytoplankton community ? A 5-year study in Camargue temporary wetlands (France) Annales de Limnologie-International. J Limnol 51:189–198
Frossard A (2011) Microbial dynamics during stream ecosystem succession: community structure and enzyme activities. University of Neuchâtel
García-Armisen T, Inceoglu Ö, Ouattara NK, Anzil A, Verbanck MA, Brion N, Servais P (2014) Seasonal variations and resilience of bacterial communities in a sewage polluted urban river. PLoS ONE 9:1–13
Gaviria-Rivera AM, Priest FG (2003) Pulsed field gel electrophoresis of chromosomal DNA reveals a clonal population structure to Bacillus thuringiensis that relates in general to crystal protein gene content. FEMS Microbiol Lett 223:61–66
Geethanjali S, Subash A (2011) Optimization of protease production by Bacillus subtilis isolated from mid gut of freshwater fish Labeo rohita. World J Fish Mar Sci 3:88–95
Gorlach-Lira K, Coutinho HDM (2007) Population dynamics and extracellular enzymes activity of mesophilic and thermophilic bacteria isolated from semi-arid soil of northeastern Brazil. Braz J Microbiol 38:135–141
Graham DW, Olivares - Rieumont S, Knapp CW, Lima L, Werner D, Bowen E (2011) Antibiotic Resistance Gene Abundances Associated with Waste Discharges to the Almendares River near Havana. Cuba Environ Sci Technol 45:418–424
Guinebretiere MH, Loux V, Martin V, Nicolas P, Sanchis V, Broussolle V (2017) Draft genome sequences of 18 psychrotolerant and 2 thermotolerant strains representative of particular ecotypes in the Bacillus cereus group. Genome Announc 5:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01568-16
Guinebretiére MH, Velge P, Couvert O, Carlin F, Debuyser M-L, Nguyen-The C (2010) Ability of Bacillus cereus group strains to cause food poisoning varies according to phylogenetic affiliation (Groups I to VII) rather than species affiliation. J Clin Microbiol 48:3388–3391. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00921-10
Guinebretière M-H et al (2013) Bacillus cytotoxicus sp. nov. is a novel thermotolerant species of the Bacillus cereus Group occasionally associated with food poisoning. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.030627-0
Haroon AH, Daboor SM (2009) The role of different macrophyte group in water quality, sediment chemistry and microbial flora of broth irrigation and drainage canals. World Appl Sci 6:1221–1230
Herfort L et al (2017) Factors affecting the bacterial community composition and heterotrophic production of Columbia River estuarine turbidity maxima. Microbiol Open e.522:1–15 https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.522
Huang S, Chen C, Wu Y, Wu Q, Zhang R (2011) Characterization of depth-related bacterial communities and their relationships with the environmental factors in the river sediments. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:2655–2664
Khan AA, Peiris P, Sharma N, Maddini G, Raghvan V, Corteau C (2011) Effect on alpha-Amylase production by employing polyethylene glycol at different concentrations in medium. Am J Food Technol 6:289–297. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajft.2011.289.297
Knapp CW, Lima L, Olivares-Rieumont S, Bowen E, Werner D, Graham DW (2012) Seasonal variations in antibiotic resistance gene transport in the Almendares River, Havana. Cuba Front Microbiol 3:1–11
Kumar V, Singh J, Pathak VV, Ahmad S, Kothari R (2017) Experimental and kinetics study for phytoremediation of sugar mill effluent using water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes L.) and its end use for biogas production 3. Biotech 7:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0963-7
Li WC, Wong MH (2011) Interaction of Cd/Zn hyperaccumulating plant (Sedum alfredii) and rhizosphere bacteria on metal uptake and removal of phenanthrene. J Hazard Mater 209–210:421–433
Litchman E (2010) Invisible invaders: non-pathogenic invasive microbes in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 13:1560–1572
Mandic-Mulec I, Stefanic P, van Elsas JD (2015) Ecol Bacillaceae Microbiol Spectrum 3:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec
Martínez-Blanch JF, Sánchez G, Garay E, Aznar R (2011) Evaluation of phenotypic and PCR-based approaches for routine analysis of Bacillus cereus group foodborne isolates. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 99:697–709
Maughan H, Van der Auwera G (2011) Bacillus taxonomy in the genomic era finds phenotypes to be essential though often misleading Infection. Genet Evol 11:789–797
Mohammad BT, Al Daghistani HI, Jaouani A, Abdel-Latif S, Kennes C (2017) Isolation and characterization of thermophilic bacteria from Jordanian Hot Springs:Bacillus licheniformis and Thermomonas hydrothermalis isolates as potential producers of thermostable enzymes International. J Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6943952
Moyo P, Chapungu L, Mudzengi B (2013) Effectiveness of water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) in remediating polluted water: the case of Shagashe river in Masvingo. Zimbabwe Adv Appl Sci Res 4:55–62
Mudryk ZJ, Podgórska B (2006) Enzymatic activity of bacterial strainsiIsolated from marine beach sediments Polish. J Environ Stud 15:441–448
Mudryk ZJ, Skórczewski P (2006) Enzymatic activity and degradation of organic macromolecules by neustonic and planktonic bacteria in an estuarine lake Polish. J Ecol 54:3–14
Økstad OA, Kolstø A-B (2011) Genomics of Bacillus species genomics of foodborne bacterial pathogens. In: Wiedmann M, Zhang W (eds) Food microbiology and food safety. Springer, New York, pp 29–53
Olivares-Rieumont S et al (2005) Assessment of heavy metal levels in Almendares River sediments-Havana City, Cuba. Water Res 39:3945–3953
Peter H (2011) Diversity and ecosystem functioning: redundancy and resilience in freshwater bacterial communities. Uppsala
Rajabi M, Jones M, Hubbard M, Rodrick G, Wright AC (2011) Distribution and genetic diversity of Salmonella enterica in the Upper Suwannee River. Int J Microbiol 2011:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/461321
Ramkumar VS, Kannapiran E, Palanisamy M (2011) Prevalence and distribution of total heterotrophic bacteria from Kottaipattinam coast, Palk Strait, Southeast coast of India. Arch Appl Sci Res 3:593–598
Reche MH, Fiuza LM (2005) Distribution and density of bacteria in subtropical flooded rice growing areas in Brazil Brazilian. J Biol 65:503–511
Romeu B, Quintero H, Larrea JA, Lugo D, Rojas N, Heydrich M (2015) Experiencias en el monitoreo ambiental: contaminación de ecosistemas dulceacuícolas de La Habana (Cuba). Higiene y Sanidad Ambiental 15:1325–1335
Santana MA, Moccia-V CC, Gillis AE (2008) Bacillus thuringiensis improved isolation methodology from soil samples. J Microbiol Methods 75:357–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2008.06.008
Schneider S, Tajrin T, Lundström JO, Hendriksen NB, Melin P, Sundh I (2017) Do multi-year applications of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis for control of mosquito larvae affect the abundance of B. cereus group populations in riparian wetland soils? Microb Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-017-1004-0
Soufiane B, Côté J-C (2009) Discrimination among Bacillus thuringiensis H serotypes, serovars and strains based on 16S rRNA, gyrB and aroE gene sequence analyses. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 95:33–45
Swiecicka I, Mahillon J (2006) Diversityof commensal Bacillus cereus sensu lato isolated from the commonsowbug (Porcellioscaber, Isopoda) FEMS. Microbiol Ecol 56:132–140
Swiecicka I, Bideshi DK, Federici DA (2008) Novel Isolate of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. thuringiensis that produces a quasicuboidal crystal of Cry1Ab21 toxic to larvae of Trichoplusia ni. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:923–930
Swiecicka I et al (2013) Diversity of thermal ecotypes and potential pathotypes of Bacillus thuringiensis soil isolates FEMS. Microbiol Ecol 85:262–272
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739
Tiquia SM (2011) Extracellular hydrolytic enzyme activities of the heterotrophic microbial communities of the Rouge River: an approach to evaluate ecosystem response to urbanization. Microb Ecol 62:679–689
Yan S-H, Song W, Guo J-Y (2016) Advances in management and utilization of invasive water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) in aquatic ecosystems—a review. Crit Rev Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2015.1132406
Yi N et al (2013) Eichhornia crassipes cleans wetlands by enhancing the nitrogen removal and modulating denitrifying bacteria community. Clean—Soil Air Water 41:1–10
Yuan H, An S, Liu E, Pan W, Zhu Z (2015) Fractionation and bioavailability of phosphorus in sediments of Huaihe River. China J Soil Water Conserv 70:313–321
Zhou MY et al (2009) Diversity of both the cultivable protease-producing bacteria and their extracellular proteases in the sediments of the South China. Sea Microb Ecol 58:582–590
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the international cooperation project “Use of Bacillus genus in the development of sustainable ecosystems of economical and social interest in Cuba”, from the WBI (Wallonie-Bruxelles International) of the Walloon Region of Belgium and the CITMA National Program for Basic Science (Cuba).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Larrea-Murrell, J.A., Rojas-Badia, M.M., García-Soto, I. et al. Diversity and enzymatic potentialities of Bacillus sp. strains isolated from a polluted freshwater ecosystem in Cuba. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 34, 28 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-018-2411-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-018-2411-1