Abstract
Borrelia theileri is a tick-borne spirochete causative agent of fever, apathy and reduced food consumption in cattle. Molecular diagnosis has expanded the understanding of Borrelia theileri with new hosts and geographical locations being described. The present study aimed to describe the first molecular detection of B. theileri in wild tapirs (Tapirus terrestris) from South America. Blood DNA samples obtained from 99 tapirs sampled in Pantanal (n = 61) and Cerrado (n = 38) biomes were screened using a qPCR assay based on the 16 S rRNA gene of Borrelia sp. Positive samples in the qPCR assay were subjected to PCR assays to allow characterization of fragments from 16 S rRNA and flaB genes. Two (2/99; 2.0%) animals from Pantanal biome were positive in the qPCR and one sample presented bands of expected size for the flaB protocol. Amplicons from this sample were successfully cloned and sequenced. In the phylogenetic analysis, Borrelia sp. from T. terrestris grouped together with B. theileri sequences previously detected in Rhipicephalus microplus ticks and cattle from Minas Gerais State in Brazil, Rhipicephalus geigyi from Mali, and R. microplus and Haemaphysalis sulcata from Pakistan. This finding contributes to our knowledge regarding susceptible hosts species for B. theileri. More studies are necessary to understand the potential effects of B. theileri on tapir’s health.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Bacteria from the genus Borrelia are vector-borne spirochetes that can cause disease in animals and humans. Since the first borrelial description in the early 20th century, different species and strains, with distinct epidemiological and clinical aspects, have been reported. Currently, these organisms are divided into three main groups: (1) The Lyme group (LG): represented by the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and transmitted exclusively by Ixodes ticks; (2) Relapsing fever group (RFG): represented by species mostly vectored by Argasidae ticks, with some species being transmitted by Ixodidae ticks or Pediculus humanus louse; and (3) Echidna-Reptile group (ERG): a recently described group, phylogenetically distinct from the former two, and transmitted by Ixodidae ticks (Margos et al. 2018; Trevisan et al. 2021a, b).
Some Borrelia species within the RFG group are known to be transmitted by hard ticks. Borrelia theileri is transmitted by Rhipicephalus sp. ticks and initially reported in Africa, Australia and South America (Theiler 1905; Callow 1967). Although this pathogen was first described in 1904 as a causative of fever, apathy and anorexia in cattle (Theiler 1904), it has been also reported in horses (Theiler 1904; Van Heerden and Reyers 1984) and small ruminants (Theiler 1904, 1905; Auoadi et al. 2017).
Molecular diagnosis has expanded the understanding of the epidemiology of B. theileri infections, allowing the description of new hosts and geographical locations for this agent. Up to now, this agent has been molecularly detected in raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoide) in Korea (Kang et al. 2018), impalas (Aepyceros melampus) in Zambia (Qiu et al. 2021) and rodents (Rattus rattus) in Thailand (Takhampunya et al. 2021). Additionally, genotypes closely related to B. theileri were detected in sika deer (Cervus nippon), wild boars (Sus scrofa), and one raccoon (Procyon lotor) in Japan (Furuno et al. 2017). Regarding tick vectors, DNA from B. theileri was detected in a pool of Amblyomma and Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) ticks in Ethiopia (Cutler et al. 2012) and in Rhipicephalus spp. ticks from Pakistan (Khan et al. 2023).
In South America, reports of B. theileri are restricted to ticks and cattle (Faccini-Martínez et al. 2022). Occurrence of this agent was molecularly confirmed in Rhipicephalus microplus collected from horses and cattle from southeastern Brazil (Yparraguirre et al. 2007; Cordeiro et al. 2018). Moreover, detection is also reported in cattle blood samples from southeastern, midwest and northern Brazil (Paula et al. 2023; Figueiroa et al. 2023), Argentina (Morel et al. 2019) and Colombia (Ramires-Hernández et al. 2022). To date, there are no reports of B. theileri in wildlife in South America. The present study aimed to describe the molecular detection of B. theileri in wild tapirs (Tapirus terrestris) from Pantanal region (Mato Grosso do Sul State) in Brazil.
Materials and methods
Sampling
Between 2013 and 2018, a total of 122 blood samples from free-living (n = 94) and road-killed (n = 5) wild tapirs were collected for health assessment purposes. Out of these animals, 61.6% (61/99) were sampled in Pantanal biome whereas 38.4% (38/99) were sampled in Cerrado biome (both biomes located in Mato Grosso do Sul State). All road-killed animals were sampled in Cerrado biome. Sampled animals were 49.5% (49/99) femalces and 50.5% (50/99) males, and 53.5% (53/99) adults (> 48 months old) and 46.5% (46/99) sub-adults (< 48 months old).
Sampling of free-living animals was performed during tapir anesthesia for the installation of GPS collars by professionals from the “Iniciativa Nacional para a Conservação da Anta Brasileira (INCAB-IPÊ)” (Lowland Tapir Conservation Initiative (LTCI-IPÊ). Detailed information about sampling procedures and study areas were described elsewhere (Mongruel et al. 2022a).
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation of FCAV/UNESP (Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences of the São Paulo State University) under protocol number 4558/20. The “Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO)” provided the required annual permits for the capture and immobilization of tapirs and collection of biological samples (SISBIO# 14,603). All protocols for the capture, anesthesia, handling, and sampling of tapirs have been reviewed and approved by the Veterinary Advisors of the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) — Tapir Taxon Advisory Group (TAG), and the Veterinary Committee of the IUCN SSC Tapir Specialist Group (TSG).
DNA extraction and amplification of mammals’ endogenous gene
DNA extraction was performed individually on each tapir blood sample, without making pools, using a commercial kit (InstaGene™ Matrix, Biorad®, Hercules, CA, USA), following the manufacturers’ instructions. Conventional PCR (cPCR) assays for the mammalian endogenous genes glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gapdh) (450 bp) (Birkenheuer et al. 2003) and interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (irpb) (227 bp) (Ferreira et al. 2010) were performed to ensure DNA recovery from blood samples. Samples that did not yield amplicons in either of the PCR protocols were excluded from the subsequent analysis.
Molecular assays
Screening of positive samples was performed using a quantitative real-time (qPCR) assay based on the 16 S rRNA gene from Borrelia sp., with a detection limit of approximately 10–20 copies of the fragment (Parola et al. 2011). Each DNA sample was independently evaluated in duplicates and samples that presented differences in Cq values higher than 0.5 were retested in triplicate. For the construction of the standard curve of each reaction, serial dilutions were performed at different concentrations (2.0 × 107 to 2.0 × 101 copies) of a plasmid encoding a conservative fragment of the 16 S rRNA gene from Borrelia sp. (pIDTSMART; Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA). These plasmids were also used as positive controls. The number of plasmid copies was determined by the formula (XG/µL DNA/ [Plasmid Length (BP) × 660]) × 6. 22 × 1023 × plasmid copies/µL. The amplification efficiency (E) was calculated according to the slope of the standard curve using the formula E = 10−1/slope (Bustin et al. 2009). Ultra-purified sterilized water (Nuclease-Free Water, Promega®, Madison, Wisconsin, United States) was used as a negative control for each reaction performed. The qPCR assays were carried out in a C1000-CFX96 thermocycler (BIORAD, Hercules, CA, USA).
Positive samples in the qPCR assay were subjected to cPCR assays to allow characterization of fragments from 16 S rRNA (Marti Ras et al. 1996) and flaB (flagellin) genes (Stromdahl et al. 2003). A positive sample for Borrelia anserina (Ataliba et al. 2007) was used as positive control and ultra-purified sterilized water (Nuclease-Free Water, Promega®, Madison, Wisconsin, United States) was used as a negative control for all reactions. Fragment sizes, primer sequences, qPCR hydrolysis probes and annealing temperature used herein are described in Table 1.
Cloning and sequencing assays
Amplicons obtained in the cPCR assays were cloned using pGEM®-T Easy System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), following the manufacturer’s recommendations. DNA and vector concentrations used in the ligation reaction were determined to obtain an insert: vector ratio of 3:1. The DNA-binding reaction consisted of adding 40 ng of insert (amplicon), 5 µL buffer, 1 µL of pGEM-T Easy vector, 1 µL of T4 Ligase enzyme and sterilized water q.s.p. Solutions were kindly mixed and incubated at 4 °C for 16 h. Then, 50 µL of competent Escherichia coli DH5α cells (109–1010 CFU/ng DNA) was added to the 10 µL ligation reaction. The mix was kept in ice for 30 min, followed by thermal shock, where microtubes were placed into a water bath at 42 °C for 2 min. Then, 100 µL of SOC (Super Optimal broth with Catabolite repression – Tryptone; Yeast Extract; NaCl; KCl; MgCl2; MgSO4; glucose [ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA]) was added, and cells were incubated at 37 °C for 1.5 h, under the agitation of 200 rpm. Subsequently, 250 µL of this medium was added to Petri plates containing agar LB (Luria Bertani medium - Tryptone; Yeast Extract; NaCl; distilled water q.s. [ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA]) medium prepared with 100 µg/mL ampicillin, 40 µl X-gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-Dgalactoside; 0.026%) and 20 µL IPTG (isopropylthio-β-galactoside; 0.82 mM). Plates were incubated at 37 °C for approximately 20 h.
Colonies of bacteria containing the inserts (white colonies) were transferred to tubes containing 5 mL of broth LB medium and incubated at 37 °C for 20 h, followed by plasmid DNA extraction using Wizard® Plus SV Minipreps DNA (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Purified plasmids were sequenced using the BigDye™ Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific™, Waltham, MA, USA) and ABI PRISM 3730 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems™, Foster City, CA, USA) (Sanger et al. 1977), at the “Centro de Recursos Biológicos e Biologia Genômica - CREBIO” (Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias/FCAV, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil). For sequencing, primers GTAAAACGACGGCCAG-3′) and M13-R(5′-CAGGAAACAGCTATGAC-3′) flanking the multiple cloning site (M13) of the pGEM®-T Easy plasmid (Promega), which includes the target gene inserts, were used (Lau et al. 2010).
Phylogenetic reconstruction
Obtained sequences were first submitted to a screening test using Geneious 11.1.3 software (hhtp://www.geneious.com) to evaluate the electropherogram quality and generate the consensus sequences. The BLASTn online program (National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD, USA (Altschul et al. 1990) was used to analyze the nucleotide sequences aiming to browse and compare with sequences from GenBank international database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/). Consensus sequences obtained in the current study and those retrieved from GenBank were aligned using a MAFFT online software (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/) (accessed on 3 March 2024). Phylogenetic inferences were based on Maximum Likelihood (ML) which was carried out using the IQ-TREE on ACCESS tool via CIPRES portal (https://www.phylo.org, accessed on 3 March 2024) (Miller et al. 2010) and for both best-fit model (following Bayesian Inference Criteria) determination and tree reconstruction. Clades’ support was evaluated using bootstrap analysis of 1000 repetitions. Trees were recovered and edited using FigTree v1.3.1. software (Rambaut 2010).
Results
All DNA blood samples successfully amplified at least one of the tested endogenous genes and were considered suitable for the further analysis. Two (2/99; 2.0%) animals from Pantanal biome were positive in the qPCR for Borrelia spp. The Efficiency, R2, Y-intercept and Slope values of the qPCR assays ranged from 92.3 to 99.8%, 0.997 to 1.000, 36.612 to 38.896 and − 3.349 to -3.520, respectively. Quantification values obtained for positive samples were described in Table 2.
The two positive samples in the qPCR assay were negative for the cPCR 16 S rRNA assay tested herein. Regarding the flab assay, only one sample (animal ID WE-P-1) amplified bands of expected size. Amplicons from this sample were successfully cloned and sequenced. A sequence of 593 bp from Borrelia spp. flaB gene was obtained and compared with sequences deposited in the GenBank database using the BLASTn software. The tapir-related sequence showed identity values of 99.66% (query cover: 99%; E-value: 0.0) with a sequence from B. theileri detected in R. microplus collected from a horse in Brazil (EF141022), 99.65% (Query cover: 96%; E-value: 0.0) with B. theileri from R. microplus collected from cattle in Colombia (PP262609) and 98.65% (Query cover: 100%; E-value: 0.0) with B. theileria from cattle in Goiás State, Brazil (ON191583). The sequence identified in the present study was deposited in the GenBank database under access number PP259188. Results from the molecular assays conducted here were summarized in Table 2.
A ML tree was constructed based on a total alignment of 615 bp containing 37 homologue flaB sequences and TPM3 + F + G4 as an evolutionary model. Sequences of representatives from LG (B. burgdorferi – DQ016625) and REG (Borrelia turcica - AB109246; Borrelia tachyglossi - KY586966) were used as outgroups. Sequence obtained from T. terrestris grouped with B. theileri sequences detected in R. microplus ticks in Brazil (MG601737, EF141022), cattle from Brazil (OQ344270, OQ344269, OQ344268, ON191583), R. geigyi from Mali (KF569936), R. microplus from Pakistan (OR574986), R. microplus from cattle in Colombia (PP262609) and Haemaphysalis sulcata from Pakistan (OR574985). The B. theileri-clade presented a separation in two minor sub-clades with high bootstrap values (100) (Fig. 1).
Although 2/99 tapirs showed positive results in the qPCR protocol for Borrelia spp., amplification and sequencing of additional genes, and consequently confirmation of the agent, were possible for only one (1.01%; 1/99) positive tapir.
Discussion
We described herein the first evidence of B. theileri occurring in a wild animal in Brazil. The lowland tapir is considered the largest terrestrial mammal from Brazil and the last representative of Neotropical mega-herbivores (Thoisy et al. 2010). Although this mammal species is currently found in four different biomes in the country, it is classified as vulnerable for extinction due factors linked to human activities (e.g. illegal hunting, wildfires, road-kills and land competition) (Medici et al. 2012).
Recently, lowland tapirs have been reported as hosts for different blood-borne and vector-borne agents, including Trypanosoma terrestris (Acosta et al. 2013), ‘Candidatus Mycoplasma haematoterrestris’, ‘Candidatus Mycoplasma haematotapirus’ (Mongruel et al. 2022a), piroplasmids (Gonçalves et al. 2020; Silva et al. 2021; Mongruel et al. 2022b) and Bartonella sp. (Mongruel et al. 2023). This is the first detection of Borrelia spp. in animals of the genus Tapirus. Although serological studies conducted in Germany evidenced the exposure to B. burgdorferi sensu lato (s.l.) in captive T. terrestris (Stoebel et al. 2003), the occurrence of cross-reactivity between antibodies produced by B. theileri and whole-cell B. burgdorferi antigens is described (Rogers et al. 1999) and must be considered during the interpretation of serological results using crude antigens. In this scenario, evidence of B. theileri exposure may be misinterpreted. In South America, the molecular screening of B. burgdorferi s.l. in Amblyomma spp. ticks collected from Andean tapirs (Tapirus pinchaque) from Ecuador resulted in negative results (Pesquera et al. 2015).
Molecular detection of B. theileri in Brazil has only been reported previously in cattle and R. microplus ticks. The 1.01% prevalence found in the present study is within the range reported by previous studies, including 1.0-1.52% for cattle (Paula et al. 2023; Figueiroa et al. 2023), and 0.25-2.0% for R. microplus collected from horses and cattle (Yparraguirre et al. 2007; Cordeiro et al. 2018). Furthermore, attempts to characterize additional target genes through cPCR was successful for only one positive sample and one molecular marker (flaB). These results might be due the low levels of bacteremia found in the sampled animals, evidenced by the low quantification values estimated by the qPCR assay.
Clinical manifestations associated with B. theileri infection are usually non-specific. Classically, this pathogen has been described as a causative of fever (Theiler 1904) and other non-specific clinical signs, such as apathy, rough hair coat, and pallor of mucous membranes in cattle (Sharma et al. 2000; Cordeiro et al. 2018). A study with cattle from Cameroon demonstrated a statically significant correlation between B. theileri infection and anemia (Abanda et al. 2019). Moreover, cattle presenting reduced milk production and food consumption were found to be positive for B. theileri in Brazil (Figueiroa et al. 2023). However, animals with subclinical infection have also been reported (Paula et al. 2023). Co-infection with B. theileri and other vector-borne agents have been reported reported favoring clinical alterations (Abanda et al. 2019; Figueiroa et al. 2023). The B. theileri-positive blood sample from the present study also amplified fragments from hemotropic Mycoplasma spp. (hemoplasmas) 16 S rRNA (Mongruel et al. 2022a), but the presence of clinical signs due to this coinfection is unknown.
The tick species R. microplus is described as the primary vector for B. theileri in South America (Faccini-Martínez et al. 2022). In fact, R. microplus collected from cattle and horses from Minas Gerais (Yparraguirre et al. 2007) and Rio de Janeiro (Cordeiro et al. 2018) states and infested cattle from Goiás (Paula et al. 2023), Minas Gerais and Pará states (Figueiroa et al. 2023) were reported to be infected by B. theileri in Brazil. Moreover, this tick species has also been reported infesting tapirs from Pantanal, as a consequence of land sharing between tapirs and cattle (Labruna et al. 2021).
The phylogenetic analysis confirmed the identity of the sequence detected within the B. theileri clade. Moreover, this clade was divided in two minor clades, with high support value (100): one containing B. theileri strain C5 (MG601737) and related sequences, and other one containing B. theileri strain BR (EF1401022) and related sequences, including the sequence obtained from a tapir. The sequence from strain B. theileri C5 was obtained from an engorged female R. microplus hemolymph. The tick was collected from apparently healthy bovines maintained in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil (Cordeiro et al. 2018). Sequence from B. theileri BR strain was obtained from R. microplus collected from a horse in Minas Gerais State, Brazil (Yparraguirre et al. 2007). This pattern of two major clades being formed was also observed in phylogenetic reconstructions inferred before using this same gene fragment (Paula et al. 2023; Figueiroa et al. 2023; Khan et al. 2023). More studies are necessary to understand if there are any differences among strains regarding the division of the B. theileri clade observed here.
We report the first documented occurrence of B. theileri in a wild tapir from South America. This finding contributes to our knowledge regarding susceptible hosts species for B. theileri. More studies are necessary to understand the potential effects of B. theileri on tapir’s health.
Data availability
The dataset generated and analyzed during the current study is available in the NCBI GenBank Nucleotide platform (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) and can be accessed through accession number: PP259188.
References
Abanda B, Paguem A, Abdoulmoumini M, Kingsley MT, Renz A, Eisenbarth A (2019) Molecular identification and prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in zebu and taurine cattle in North Cameroon Parasit Vectors. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3699-x
Acosta IC, da Costa AP, Nunes PH, Gondim MF, Gatti A, Rossi JL Jr, Gennari SM, Marcili A (2013) Morphological and molecular characterization and phylogenetic relationships of a new species of trypanosome in Tapirus terrestris (lowland tapir), Trypanosoma terrestris sp. nov., from Atlantic Rainforest of southeastern Brazil. Parasit Vectors. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-6-349
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2
Ataliba AC, Resende JS, Yoshinari N, Labruna MB (2007) Isolation and molecular characterization of a Brazilian strain of Borrelia anserina, the agent of fowl spirochaetosis. Res Vet Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2006.11.014
Auoadi A, Leulmi H, Boucheikhchoukh M, Benakhla A, Raoult D, Parola P (2017) Molecular evidence of tick-borne hemoprotozoan-parasites (Theileria ovis and Babesia ovis) and bacteria in ticks and blood from small ruminants in Northern Algeria. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cimid.2016.11.008
Birkenheuer AJ, Levy MG, Breitschwerdt EB (2003) Development and evaluation of a seminested PCR for detection and differentiation of Babesia gibsoni (Asian genotype) and B. canis DNA in canine blood samples. J Clin Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.41.9.4172-4177.2003
Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, Mueller R, Nolan T, Pfaffl MW, Shipley GL, Vandesompele J, Wittwer CT (2009) The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797
Callow LL (1967) Observations on tick-transmitted spirochaetes of cattle in Australia and South Africa. Br Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007-1935(17)39704-x
Cordeiro MD, Bahia M, Magalhães-Matos PC, Cepeda MB, Guterres A, Fonseca AH (2018) Morphological, molecular and phylogenetic characterization of Borrelia theileri in Rhipicephalus microplus. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-296120180083
Cutler S, Abdissa A, Adamu H, Tolosa T, Gashaw A (2012) Borrelia in Ethiopian ticks. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2011.08.004
Faccini-Martínez ÁA, Silva-Ramos CR, Santodomingo AM, Ramírez-Hernández A, Costa FB, Labruna MB, Muñoz-Leal S (2022) Historical overview and update on relapsing fever group Borrelia in Latin America. Parasit Vectors. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05289-5
Ferreira EC, Gontijo CM, Cruz I, Melo MN, Silva AM (2010) Alternative PCR protocol using a single primer set for assessing DNA quality in several tissues from a large variety of mammalian species living in areas endemic for leishmaniasis. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0074-02762010000700009
Figueiroa T, de Azevedo Baêta B, da Silva JB, da Silva Lima DH, Guterres A, da Silva MM, da Fonseca AH, Cordeiro MD (2023) Borrelia theileri in bovine in the northern and southeastern regions of Brazil. Trop Anim Health Prod. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03637-w
Furuno K, Lee K, Itoh Y, Suzuki K, Yonemitsu K, Kuwata R, Shimoda H, Watarai M, Maeda K, Takano A (2017) Epidemiological study of relapsing fever borreliae detected in Haemaphysalis ticks and wild animals in the western part of Japan. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174727
Gonçalves TS, de Nazaré FLB, Inoue LS, de Farias DM, Dos Santos JL, Nobre AV, Aidar AES, Diniz FRR, Gering AP, Scofield A (2020) Natural Theileria equi infection in captive Tapirus terrestris (Perissodactyla: Tapiridae) in the Brazilian Amazon. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2020.101452
Kang JG, Chae JB, Cho YK, Jo YS, Shin NS, Lee H, Choi KS, Yu DH, Park J, Park BK, Chae JS (2018) Molecular detection of Anaplasma, Bartonella, and Borrelia theileri in Raccoon Dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in Korea. Am J Trop Med Hyg. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.17-0380
Khan M, Almutairi MM, Alouffi A, Tanaka T, Chang SC, Chen CC, Ali A (2023) Molecular evidence of Borrelia theileri and closely related Borrelia spp. in hard ticks infesting domestic animals. Front Vet Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1297928
Labruna MB, Martins TF, Acosta ICL, Serpa MCA, Soares HS, Teixeira RHF, Fernandes-Santos RC, Medici EP (2021) Ticks and rickettsial exposure in lowland tapirs (Tapirus terrestris) of three Brazilian biomes. Ticks Tick-borne Dis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2021.101648
Lau AO, Cereceres K, Palmer GH, Fretwell DL, Pedroni MJ, Mosqueda J, McElwain TF (2010) Genotypic diversity of merozoite surface antigen 1 of Babesia bovis within an endemic population. Mol Biochem Parasitol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molbiopara.2010.03.017
Margos G, Gofton A, Wibberg D, Dangel A, Marosevic D, Loh SM, Oskam C, Fingerle V (2018) The genus Borrelia reloaded. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208432
Marti Ras N, Lascola B, Postic D, Cutler SJ, Rodhain F, Baranton G, Raoult D (1996) Phylogenesis of Relapsing fever Borrelia spp. Intern J System Bacteriol. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-46-4-859
Medici EP, Flesher K, Beisiegel BM, Keuroghlian A, Desbiez ALJ, Gatti A, Pontes ARM, Campos CB, Tófoli CF, Moares Junior EA, Azevedo FC, Pinho GM, Cordeiro JLP, Santos Junior TS, Morais AA, Mangini PR, Rodrigues LF, Almeida LB (2012) Avaliação do Risco De Extinção Da Anta Brasileira Tapirus terrestris Linnaeus, 1758, no Brasil. Biodiversidade Brasileira 3:103–116
Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE). https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129
Mongruel ACB, Medici EP, Canena ADC, Calchi AC, Machado RZ, André MR (2022a) Expanding the universe of hemoplasmas: multi-locus sequencing reveals putative novel hemoplasmas in lowland Tapirs (Tapirus terrestris), the largest land mammals in Brazil. Microorganisms. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10030614
Mongruel ACB, Medici EP, da Costa Canena A, Calchi AC, Perles L, Rodrigues BCB, Soares JF, Machado RZ, André MR (2022b) Theileria terrestris nov. sp.: A novel Theileria in lowland Tapirs (Tapirus terrestris) from two different biomes in Brazil. Microorganisms. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10122319
Mongruel ACB, Medici EP, Canena ADC, Dias CM, Machado RZ, André MR (2023) Molecular evidence of Bartonella spp. in wild lowland tapirs (Tapirus terrestris), the largest land mammals in Brazil. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cimid.2023.102042
Morel N, De Salvo MN, Cicuttin G, Rossner V, Thompson CS, Mangold AJ, Nava S (2019) The presence of Borrelia theileri in Argentina. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Rep. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vprsr.2019.100314
Parola P, Ryelandt J, Mangold AJ, Mediannikov O, Guglielmone AA, Raoult D (2011) Relapsing fever Borrelia in Ornithodoros ticks from Bolivia. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. https://doi.org/10.1179/1364859411Y.0000000021
Paula WVF, Neves LC, de Paula LGF, Serpa MCA, de Oliveira FP, Dantas-Torres F, Muñoz-Leal S, Labruna MB, Krawczak FDS (2023) First molecular detection of Borrelia theileri subclinical infection in a cow from Brazil. Vet Res Commun. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-022-10020-x
Pesquera C, Portillo A, Palomar AM, Oteo JA (2015) Investigation of tick-borne bacteria (Rickettsia spp., Anaplasma spp., Ehrlichia spp. and Borrelia spp.) in ticks collected from Andean tapirs, cattle and vegetation from a protected area in Ecuador. Parasit Vectors. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0662-3
Qiu Y, Squarre D, Nakamura Y, Lau ACC, Moonga LC, Kawai N, Ohnuma A, Hayashida K, Nakao R, Yamagishi J, Sawa H, Namangala B, Kawabata H (2021) Evidence of Borrelia theileri in wild and domestic animals in the Kafue ecosystem of Zambia. Microorganisms. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112405
Rambaut A (2010) FigTree v1.3.1. Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/
Ramírez-Hernández A, Arroyave E, Faccini-Martínez ÁA, Martínez-Diaz HC, Betancourt-Ruiz P, Olaya-M LA, Forero-Becerra EG, Hidalgo M, Blanton LS, Walker DH (2022) Emerging tickborne Bacteria in cattle from Colombia. Emerg Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2810.220657
Rogers AB, Smith RD, Kakoma I (1999) Serologic cross-reactivity of antibodies against Borrelia theileri, Borrelia burgdorferi, and Borrelia coriaceae in cattle. Am J Vet Res 60(6):694–697
Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR (1977) DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463
Sharma SP, Amanfu W, Losho TC (2000) Bovine borreliosis in Botswana. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 67(3):221-3
Silva VLB, Almeida SLH, Maia MO, Santos TÁ, Pavelegini LAD, Zaffalon GB, Marcili A, Morgado TO, Dutra V, Nakazato L, Pacheco RC (2021) Post mortem protozoan hemoparasites detection in wild mammals from Mato Grosso state, Midwestern Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612021083
Stoebel K, Schoenberg A, Streich WJ (2003) The seroepidemiology of Lyme borreliosis in zoo animals in Germany. Epidemiol Infect. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950268803008896
Stromdahl EY, Williamson PC, Kollars TM Jr, Evans SR, Barry RK, Vince MA, Dobbs NA (2003) Evidence of Borrelia lonestari DNA in Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae) removed from humans. J Clin Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.41.12.5557-5562.2003
Takhampunya R, Thaloengsok S, Tippayachai B, Promsathaporn S, Leepitakrat S, Gross K, Davidson SA (2021) Retrospective survey of Borrelia Spp. From rodents and ticks in Thailand. J Med Entomol. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjaa279
Theiler A (1904) Spirillosis of cattle. J Comp Pathol Ther. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0368-1742(04)80003-1
Theiler A (1905) Transmission and inoculability of Spirillum theileri (Laveran). Proc R Soc Lond 76:504–506. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1905.0043
Thoisy B, da Silva AG, Ruiz-García M, Tapia A, Ramirez O, Arana M, Quse V, Paz-y-Miño C, Tobler M, Pedraza C, Lavergne A (2010) Population history, phylogeography, and conservation genetics of the last neotropical mega-herbivore, the lowland tapir (Tapirus terrestris). BMC Evol Biol. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-10-278
Trevisan G, Cinco M, Trevisini S, di Meo N, Chersi K, Ruscio M, Forgione P, Bonin S (2021a) Borreliae Part 1: Borrelia Lyme Group and Echidna-Reptile Group. Biology (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10101036
Trevisan G, Cinco M, Trevisini S, di Meo N, Ruscio M, Forgione P, Bonin S (2021b) Borreliae Part 2: Relapsing Fever Group and Unclassified Borrelia. Biology (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10111117
Van Heerden J, Reyers F (1984) Borrelia sp. infection in a horse. J S Afr Vet Assoc 55(1):41–43
Yparraguirre LA, Machado-Ferreira E, Ullmann AJ, Piesman J, Zeidner NS, Soares CA (2007) A hard tick relapsing fever group spirochete in a Brazilian Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2007.0144
Acknowledgements
This study is part of Anna Mongruel’s PhD thesis. She is carrying out her research at Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina Veterinária—Universidade Estadual Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP/Jaboticabal) and is sponsored by a fellowship from Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP– Process #2019/26403-0) at the time of this study. Authors would like to thank the Lowland Tapir Conservation Initiative (LTCI)–Instituto de Pesquisas Ecológicas (IPÊ) for kindly providing the biological samples needed for the present study. The study of tapir health has been an important component of the long-term activities of the LTCI-IPÊ in Brazil. The LTCI has the institutional support from the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Species Survival Commission (SSC) Tapir Specialist Group (TSG), Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA), Tapir Taxon Advisory Group (TAG), and European Association of Zoos and Aquariums (EAZA). This work was supported by FAPESP - Process #2020/12037-0 and #2022/08543-2) and CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development; Productivity Grant to MRA - Process #303701/2021-8).
Funding
Anna Mongruel is sponsored by a fellowship from Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP – Process #2019/26403-0) at the time of this study. This work was supported by FAPESP - Process #2020/12037-0 and #2022/08543-2) and CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development; Productivity Grant to MRA - Process #303701/2021-8). LTCI’s financial support comes from national and international agencies, including zoological institutions, foundations, private businesses, and private individuals.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Authors Contribution statement Anna Claudia Baumel Mongruel: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & Editing. Emília Patrícia Medici: Methodology, Conceptualization, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing. Ariel da Costa Canena: Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing. Rosangela Zacarias Machado: Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing. Keith Clay: Methodology, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing, Supervision. Marcelo Bahia Labruna: Writing – Review & Editing. Marcos Rogério André: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing, Supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation of FCAV/UNESP (Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences of the São Paulo State University) under protocol number 4558/20. The “Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO)” provided the required annual permits for the capture and immobilization of tapirs and collection of biological samples (SISBIO# 14,603). All protocols for the capture, anesthesia, handling, and sampling of tapirs have been reviewed and approved by the Veterinary Advisors of the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) — Tapir Taxon Advisory Group (TAG), and the Veterinary Committee of the IUCN SSC Tapir Specialist Group (TSG). Tapir blood DNA samples from the present study were registered in the Brazilian National System for Management of Genetic Heritage and Associated Traditional Knowledge (Sistema Nacional de Gestão do Patrimônio Genético e do Conhecimento Tradicional Associado – SISGEN) under register number AE4CC0C.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mongruel, A.C.B., Medici, E.P., da Costa Canena, A. et al. First molecular detection of Borrelia sp. in tapirs (Tapirus terrestris). Vet Res Commun 48, 2767–2774 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-024-10406-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-024-10406-z