Introduction

Rotaviruses are among the disease-causing agents responsible for great public health challenges and high economic losses in livestock industry all over the world (FAO 2000). Nigeria has been ranked third among the 10 countries with the greatest number of rotavirus disease-associated deaths with up to 33,000 annual estimated deaths in children under 5 years old (Aminu et al. 2010). Recently, an 8-year surveillance study on diarrhea diseases in children less than 5 years of age has revealed that 2043 (47%) of the 4377 cases were positive for rotavirus with a case fatality rate of 1.3% (WHO 2018). They belong to the virus family Reoviridae and genus Rotavirus. They consist of eleven segments structural and non-structural proteins and measure 75 nm in diameter (Estes and Kapikian 2007). They are distinguished into eight serotypes (A–H) and several of them have been identified and reported in humans and animals worldwide (Adah et al. 1997a; Andrej et al. 2008; Dzikwi et al. 2008; Waggie et al. 2010). They cause diarrhea in young animal and children with high morbidity and mortality rates (Aminu et al. 2008; Sarma 2009; Dash et al. 2011). The infection has been revealed to be transmitted via the fecal-oral route and by contact with contaminated fomites (Mwenda et al. 2010; Dash et al. 2011).

Data on the epidemiology of the infection and the associated public health impact have not been fully documented (Sarma 2009; Dash et al. 2011; Ayuba 2011). At the present, more than 27 G and 35 P genotypes have been reported to be either restricted in some animal species or humans while some have shown high levels of interspecies transmission and from animals to humans (Gentsch et al. 2005; Rahman et al. 2005; Khamrin et al. 2006; Khamrin et al. 2007; Miyazaki et al. 2011). The reported increase in the isolation rate of G and P types in different parts of the world, like the predominance of G9[P6] strains in India, G8[P6] strains in Malawi, and G5[P8] strains in Brazil, calls for more attention in our environment (Van der Heidel et al. 2005). In Nigeria, there is still gap in literature on infection in animals compared with many report on the prevalence in children (Nimzing et al. 2000; Junaid et al. 2011; Aminu et al. 2014; Alkali et al. 2016). This study, therefore, was aimed at determining the prevalence of rotavirus A infection and detection of strain types in ruminants in Yobe state, Nigeria.

Materials and methods

Study area

Yobe state is located in the northeastern geopolitical zone of Nigeria between latitudes 10° 30′ and 13° 25′ N and longitudes 9° 35′ and 12° 30′ E of the Northern hemisphere. The state shares international boundary with Niger Republic in the extreme north and interstate boundaries with Borno state to the east, Bauchi and Jigawa states to the west, and Gombe state to the south (Oruonye 2009). The state has one of the largest livestock market in West Africa, and animal production in the state is consist of ruminants and local poultry (Oruonye 2009). Pastoralism is practiced by sedentary livestock farmers and nomadic Fulani groups (Oruonye 2009; Ayuba 2011) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of Yobe state, Nigeria, showing the local government areas of the state. Source: Geospatial Analysis Mapping and Environmental Research Solutions (GAMERS) 2018

Study sites

The study was carried out in the 17 local government areas (LGAs) of the state which has been grouped into five agricultural zones (MAWR 2008) as follows: Gashua zone (Bade, Karsuwa, and Jakusko LGAs), Geidam zone (Geidam, Bursari, and Yunusari LGAs), Gujba zone (Gujba, Gulani, Tarmua, and Damaturu LGAs), Nguru zone (Nguru, Machina, and Yusufari LGAs), and Potiskum zone (Potiskum, Fune, Nangere, and Fika LGAs). In all, five LGAs (one selected at random from each of the five agricultural zones) were used (Thrusfield 1997).

Study population

The study participants and subjects were young of ruminants in study sites. Calves, kids, and lambs with diarrhea in the selected LGAs constituted the target population.

Sampling frame

Five selected LGAs in all were visited for sample collection. Pastoralists’ camps, institutional farms, and household farms in the selected LGAs were identified and sampled.

Sampling methods

A multi-stage and cluster sampling methods were adopted to select sampling units (grazing fields and farms) (Mitchell 2003; USDA 2016; Casburn 2016). All individual target units (calves, kids, and lambs) in selected units (pastoralist’s camps, institutional farms, and household farms) were sampled as described by Putt et al. (1987). Calves, kids, and lambs were grouped according to age (< 1–3, 4–6, and 7–9) months old. Age categories of the ruminant where no records existed were determined by approximation by owner of the animal (Banerjee 1998).

Sample size estimation

The minimum sample size for each species was calculated using the formula n = z2 × p (1 − p) ÷ d2 (Thrusfield 1997) where n = sample size, z = score for confidence interval (95% confidence coefficient was taken at 1.96 score), p = expected prevalence, and d = 5% desired precision.

For cattle, p = 3.2% (Adah et al. 2002) n = 1.962 × 0.032(1 – 0.032) ÷ 0.052 = 48. For sheep, p = 11% (Alkali et al. 2017) n = 1.962 × 0.11(1 – 0.11) ÷ 0.052 = 150. For goat, p = 4% (Alkali et al. 2017) n = 1.962 × 0.04(1 – 0.04) ÷ 0.052 = 59. A minimum of 257 samples was required. However, in order to maximize the ELISA reagents available, 470 samples were used in the study.

Inclusion criteria

Only ruminant owners who consented to request for sample collection were included in the sample collection. Non-diarrheic and older than 12 months calves, kids, and lambs and adult cattle, goat, and sheep were excluded.

Descriptive criteria for diarrhea

Diarrhea is loose, watery stools which is said to have occurred if an animal has loose stools three or more times in 1 day. Acute diarrhea is diarrhea that lasts a short time about 1 or 2 days which is the most common sign of rotavirus infection in young animals (WHO 2009a, b).

Sample collection and storage

About 1–2 g fecal samples was collected per-rectum into a labeled, capped, sterilized, wide mouth, universal plastic container from each of the animals using aseptic disposable wood spatula and hand gloves. The samples were transported cooled using ice to the laboratory and stored at 2–4 °C for less than 48 h and further processed as described by Dash et al. (2011) and Junaid et al. (2011).

Sample preparation

About 0.1 g or 300 μL fecal suspension was added to 1 mL distilled water for each sample. The mixture was vortex for a minute and 1 mL of supernatant was transferred into a fresh labeled tube and used for ELISA test.

Detection of rotavirus group A (RVA) virus

Enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) test kit for antigenic detection of rotavirus was used (Bio K 343/2™, Bio-X Diagnostics, Belgium) on 470 samples while the ELISA-positive samples were subjected to RT-PCR and second round PCR to determine their genotypes (WHO 2009a, b). In addition, deduced amino acids sequencing of the major variable regions of the genes was equally conducted. For the ELISA test, a commercially available ELISA kit was used and the optical density readings were measured using microplate spectrophotometer (Optical Ivymen System®) with a 450-nm filter and calculated according to the manufacturers’ instruction (Yilmaz et al. 2017). RNA extraction, RT-PCR of VP7 and VP4 to complementary DNA (cDNA), and gel electrophoresis (PAGE) were done as described by Herring et al. (1982) and Dash et al. (2011), to confirm the rotavirus group A types using specific primers (Dzikwi et al. 2008; Esona et al. 2010) (Tables 1 and 2).

Table 1 List of primers and genotype strains used for VP7 genotyping of rotavirus
Table 2 List of primers and genotype strains used for VP4 genotyping of Rotaviruses

RNA extraction for RT-PCR

RNA extraction was performed by TRIzol method. Briefly, 500 μL of fecal suspension was transferred into an Eppendorf tube; 1 mL TRIzol reagent was added, vortexed, and incubated for 5 min at room temperature; and 200 μL chloroform was added, vortexed, and kept at room temperature for 3 min. The mixture was centrifuged for 10 min at 20817.16 gravity. The upper aqueous phase containing the dsRNA 500 μL was carefully harvested and placed in clean labeled Eppendorf tubes. To the freshly harvested RNA, 500 μL isopropanol was added and incubated at room temperature for 10 min which allowed the reaction to precipitate. The solution was centrifuged at 14000 rpm for 10 min then the fluid was decanted without disturbing the pellet. The pellets were washed using 500 μL of 75% ethanol and the fluid decanted without disturbing the pellet. The pellet was air-dried and suspended in 50 μL nuclease-free water and incubated at 55 °C for 5 min. The extracted dsRNA was used in the one-step RT-PCR.

PCR amplification of the cDNA

The transcribed dsRNA (cDNA) was subjected to amplification in the following order. To the incubated reaction solution, 39.7 μL (OneTaq and One-Step Enzyme Mix) and 0.3 μL Taq polymerase were added and the reaction was thereafter subjected to the following PCR program as follows: Initial denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min, 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 42 °C for 2 min, extension at 72 °C for 5 min, final extension at 72 °C for 7 min, and held at 4 °C. The PCR products were loaded into a prepared agarose gel which contained 4 μL mL−1 ethidium bromide and was electrophoresed in Tris-acetic acid-EDTA (TAE) buffer at 100 V for 45 min and the migration size of each sample was captured and visualized to determine the rotavirus full-length VP7 and VP4.

RT-PCR products and genotyping of the gene VP4 and VP7 for rotaviruses

The following PCR protocol was used: Initial denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min, 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 2 min, elongation at 72 °C for 1 min and final elongation at 72 °C for 7 min, and held at 4 °C. The PCR product was loaded to 2% agarose gel and the genotypes in kilo base pair (bp) was determined from the size of the amplicons.

Interpretation of RT-PCR products and genotyping results

The RT-PCR genotyping results were interpreted by comparing the band (produced migration of sample as captured from the gel electrophoreses) with the expected band of positive control of respective genotypes (G types and P types).

Data analyses and presentation

Data were analyzed for percentages/proportion frequency tables. Logistic regression was used to obtain p values, odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). BioEdit BioStatistical software was used for sequences analysis while GenBank/Blast and MEGA 7 were used for the reference strains.

Results

A total of 470 fecal samples from diarrheic young of three ruminant species (bovine, 110; ovine, 202; caprine, 158) at different farms in the five agricultural zones of Yobe state was collected and analyzed. The overall prevalence rate of rotavirus infection in ruminants in the five agricultural zones of Yobe state as detected with ELISA was 2.98% with species-specific prevalence rates of 3.8% (6/158), 2.9% (6/202), and 1.8% (2/110) for kids, lambs, and calves respectively (Table 3). The odds of the infection for ovine species are almost equal to the odds of the infection for both bovine and caprine species with true population effect between 96.0 and 80.9%. The result was not statistically significant (p = 0.636; OR = 0.932; 95% CI = 0.398–1.907).

Table 3 Prevalence of rotavirus group A infection in three ruminants species in Yobe state, Nigeria

The infection was detected in all the age groups studied. Out of the 14 ELISA-positive cases recorded, the age group < 1–3 months showed the highest prevalence of 3.6% (12/331) followed by age groups 7–9 months 1.8% (1/84) and age group 4–6 months 1.2% (1/55). The result was not statistically significant (p = 0.435; OR = 1.943; 95% CI = 0.675–5.764) (Table 4).

Table 4 Prevalence of rotavirus group A infection in relation to age group and sex in Yobe state, Nigeria

The prevalence of rotavirus infection in the males was 4.6% (9/185) which is higher than 1.8% (5/285) observed in the females. The result was statistically significant but the odds of the infection for male was 3.6 times more likely than the odds of the infection for female with true population effect between 90.4 and 14.8% (p = 0.050; OR = 3.648; 95% CI = 0.965–11.475) (Table 4).

Rotavirus infection was detected in all the five agricultural zones of Yobe state and the distribution of the 14 Rotavirus-positive infection among ruminant species showed that Damaturu zone had the highest prevalence rate 57.1% (8/14) followed by Gashua and Nguru zones 14.3% (2/14) each, while Geidam and Potiskum zones had the least rates of prevalence 7.14% (1/14) (Fig. 2). Amplicons corresponding to full-length VP7 and partial length VP4 genes were detected in 2 (14.3%) of the 14 ELISA-positive samples from ruminants (Figs. 3 and 4). Furthermore, the deduced amino acid sequences of the major variable regions revealed one of the genes to belong to types G3[P11] when compared with sequences from the gene bank (Table 5, Figs. 5 and 6).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Prevalence of rotavirus infection in ruminants’ species in the five agricultural zones of Yobe state. DTR, Damaturu; PKM, Potiskum; GSH, Gashua; NGR, Nguru; GDM, Geidam

Fig. 3
figure 3

Gel picture of rotavirus VP7 gene with RT-PCR products from cattle in Yobe state. Lane 1 indicates 1200 bp DNA marker while lanes 2–16 were samples. Lanes 4 and 5 indicate expected band size for VP7 of 1062 bp. Lane 4 showed faint band while lane 5 showed bold band on the gel as pointed by the thick arrow

Fig. 4
figure 4

Gel picture of rotavirus VP4 gene with RT-PCR products from cattle in Yobe state. Lane 1 indicates 1200 bp DNA marker while lanes 2–16 are samples. Lane 5 indicates expected band size of 876 bp for VP4 genotype whole lane 4 did not show band on the gel

Table 5 Summary of deduced amino acid sequences of VP7 and VP4 antigenic sites of animal rotavirus A detected in Yobe compared with reference G genotypes and P genotypes strains
Fig. 5
figure 5

Deduced amino acid (15–255) sequences of VP7 antigenic sites of animal rotavirus A detected (BB4_22 consensus) in Yobe compared with G-type reference strains. GenBank/Blast were used for data analysis of the reference strains while MEGA 7 was used for analysis of samples. Reference strains and sequences obtained from GenBank/NCBI are indicated by their accession numbers. Sequences begin from the 15th amino acids (aa). Major variable antigenic sites A (aa 87–101), B (aa 142–152), and C (aa 208–221) were used to deduced genotype

Fig. 6
figure 6

Deduced amino acid (1–214) sequences of VP4 antigenic sites of animal (bovine) rotavirus A (consensus BC4_2) detected in Yobe compared with P[11] reference strains. BioEdit BioStatistical software was used for sequence analysis. Reference strains and sequences obtained from GenBank/NCBI are indicated by their accession number. Sequences begin from the 31st amino acids (aa). Major variable antigenic sites A (aa 87–101), B (aa 142–152), and C (aa 208–221) were used to deduced genotype

Discussion

Rotavirus infection is of both economic and public health importance. Its prevalence in ruminants and the detection of G3 [P11] strain in cattle is a confirmation of the circulation of the virus strain in the study area. The detected strain was different from the G8 genotype previously reported in bovine species in the north-east Nigeria (Adah et al. 2002). Previous studies in Nigeria had also identified strains of G1P[8], G3P[6], G1P[6], and G2P[6] as the common prevalent ones and G3P[8] which could not be typed due to mutation (Adah et al. 1997b; Adah et al. 2001). The discovery of G3 [P11] strain in this study gives an additional insight to the genetic variability and the emergence of rotavirus reassortants in the environment. This unusual diversity among the strains in Nigeria has been associated with mixed infections with rotavirus including those of animal origin (Gouvea and Brantly 1995; Adah et al. 2001). Assessment of evolution and epidemiological pathways of Rotaviruses in human, mammals, and birds has been conducted by genotyping techniques (Matthijnssens and Van Ranst 2012). These include varied mechanisms of evolution by mutation types of one or several combinations of the following: point mutations, genome reassortment, genome rearrangements, and true genome recombination (Kojima et al. 2000; Jere et al. 2011; Matthijnssens and Van Ranst 2012; Luchs and Timenetsky 2014; De Grazia et al. 2014).

Changes in virus virulence resulting from mutation in viral gene products have been reported (Tyler and Fields 1990; Andrej et al. 2008; Midgley et al. 2012). The G3 genotype detected in the study is one of the three rotavirus genotypes which have been reported in humans and animals (Desselberger and Huppertz 2011). This may suggest the expanding landscape of rotavirus genotypes in Yobe state, with a possible reduction in productivity and loss of revenue which can be associated with treatment and death of animals in state which supports production and trade in livestock in Nigeria geographically (Oruonye 2009). The infection in ruminant’ species may not only affect international trade on meat or other livestock products, but there is the risk of acquiring of the infection among other animal species and humans (Santos et al. 1999). Furthermore, it implies that any Rotavirus-control program in cattle alone would not be successful, if not coupled with surveillance and control policies in small ruminants (Gentsch et al. 2005). Therefore, data on circulating rotavirus strains in animals is pertinent in vaccine production for use in developing countries (Aminu et al. 2010).

The overall prevalence (2.98%) recorded in this study can be associated with extremely low viral antigen concentration in the fecal samples as it has been revealed that not less than 109 virus particles per gram are required for detection of Rotaviruses in fecal samples (Grassi et al. 2009). It may also be a reflection of the environmental contamination in the state. Earlier researchers have also observed that rotavirus infection tend to be higher in intensively reared farm animals unlike the extensive system being practiced in the study area (Fenner et al. 1993). The prevalence rate in calves was higher than the zero prevalence reported by Alkali et al. (2017) in the same species in Sokoto, north-western, Nigeria, but was lower than 3.2% and 23.16% prevalence rates in calves as reported by Adah et al. (2002) and Aminu et al. (2014) in Nigeria. Furthermore, the prevalence rates of 3.8% and 2.9% in kids and lambs, respectively, in this study were lower than that of 11.0% in kids and 4.0% in lambs in Sokoto state, Nigeria (Alkali et al. 2017). Discrepancy in prevalence rates of Rotaviruses has been ascribed to many factors including sample size, storage, and screening method used. The detection of the infection in all the age groups studied was in agreement with the findings in earlier studies by Adah et al. (2002) and Aminu et al. (2014) who reported higher prevalence in calves of age group 0–3 months in northern Nigeria. It is believed that severity and susceptibility to rotavirus infection in newborn calves, lambs, kids, or piglets decreases as the animal becomes older (Adah et al. 2002). The high prevalence found in ruminants less than 3 months of age in this study could be due to insufficient antibodies against rotavirus infection in the animals as a result of milk deprivation for economic reasons, feeding on contaminated feed, or contacts with Rotavirus-contaminated environment.

The higher prevalence of rotavirus in male 4.6% (9/185) than in female 1.8% (5/285) in this study was in agreement with other report findings that reported male calves as highly susceptible to rotavirus infection than the females (Adah et al. 2002; Sarma et al. 2009; Aminu et al. 2014). However, more studies are needed to prove that the sex susceptibility is not by chance (Junaid et al. 2011). Rotavirus infection as detected in ruminant species in all the five agricultural zones of Yobe state is a revelation of widespread distribution of rotaviruses in various communities of the state. Kapikian and Chanock (1996) observed that distribution of rotaviruses in a community is shown by acquisition of antibodies to pathogens in infected animals. The observed difference in rates of infection across zones may be due to difference in spread of animal Rotaviruses or the level of herd immunity of ruminants or environmental contamination of the agricultural zones in the state. It has been reported that sample sources from healthy or non-diarrheic animals usually have low concentrations of rotavirus (Tate et al. 2013); however, the detection of the virus at low level from diarrheic fecal samples with the use of both ELISA and RT-PCR further confirms the low level of environmental contamination in the area. On the other hand, the reason for the low rate of detection using molecular technique in this study could be that the nucleic acid in most of the ELISA-positive samples had been degraded during long storage (Halstead et al. 2013) or were insufficient to permit genotyping (Adah et al. 1997a). Factor like point mutation in the genotyping regions of the VP7 and VP4 isolates has equally been implicated (Manuja et al. 2008; Sarma 2009). Furthermore, RT-PCR procedure with the two most commonly used primer pair sets are among other factors to be considered (Cunliffe et al. 1999; Esona et al. 2010; Gouvea et al. 1990; Fischer et al. 2003).

Sequence analysis has become the standard for both confirmation and identification of “non typable” strains. Confirmatory sequencing is usually performed either on the genotype-specific products or on a fragment of the VP7 or VP4 gene after amplification (WHO 2009a, b) and by compares of the sequences using the genotype-specific variable regions (Kobayashi et al. 2007). The results described herein indicate a 2.98% prevalence of rotavirus infection in ruminant species and a new virus strain G3[P11] in cattle, revealing the diversity of rotavirus strains in the animal population in the dispersed agricultural zones of Yobe state, Nigeria. This could be a pointer to potentials for genetic reassortment among rotavirus strains circulating in the state and other public health and economic implications, thus highlighting the urgent need for continuous surveillance, awareness campaign, and measures to control the infection spread.