Abstract
Aims
Symbiotic nitrogen fixation (SNF) contributes to improve grain yield under nitrogen (N) deficiency. Climbing beans are known to be superior to bush beans in their potential for SNF. The main objectives of this study were to: (i) quantify genotypic differences in SNF ability of climbing beans using 15N natural abundance method; (ii) identify climbing bean genotypes that combine high SNF ability with high yield potential that could serve as parents in the breeding program; and (iii) test whether δ15N in seed can be used instead of δ15N in shoot for estimating SNF ability.
Methods
98 Climbing bean genotypes were evaluated for SNF ability in terms of nitrogen derived from the atmosphere (%Ndfa). Field trials were conducted at two locations in Colombia.
Results
Significant genotypic differences were observed in SNF ability. Good yielding lines with 4.6 t ha−1 fixed as much as 60% of their N (up to 92 kg of N fixed ha−1) without application of N fertilizer to soil.
Conclusions
Based on evaluations from both locations, seven climbing bean lines (ENF 235, ENF 234, ENF 28, ENF 21, MAC 27, CGA 10 and PO07AT49) were identified as promising genotypes. Seed samples can be used to determine SNF ability, to select for genotypes with superior SNF ability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is the most important food legume in the tropics of Latin America and eastern and southern Africa. It is an inexpensive source of protein and important for food security for small farmers in countries with endemic poverty (Rao 2014). This crop is grown by smallholder farmers mainly by women where it is often produced on marginal lands with minimum use of inputs and exposed to low nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) deficiencies and drought that reduce yields (Beebe et al. 2008). However, legume crops are able to acquire their N from soil and also from symbiotic nitrogen fixation (SNF) that provide the alternative source of available N to the individual plant (Unkovich et al. 2008). In common bean around 60% of N is derived from soil (Ndfs) with 40% supplied through SNF process (Unkovich and Pate 2000; Peoples et al. 2009). Improving SNF potential serves not only as a low cost strategy to maintain productivity but also contributes to the possibility to successfully grow grain legume crops with minimal N fertilizers in soils with N deficiencies, thereby reducing both the cost of crop production and risk for hunger and malnutrition (Vance 2001; Mafongoya et al. 2009)
Most of the research on improving SNF in common bean has been conducted using bush bean genotypes. The estimated mean value of %N derived from the atmosphere (%Ndfa) for bush bean is 40%, this value is moderately in contrast with 68% and 75% of soybean and faba bean, respectively (Unkovich and Pate 2000; Herridge et al. 2008; Peoples et al. 2009). However, under optimal conditions in the field, common bean can derive up to 73% of total plant N through SNF and fix up to 125 kg N ha−1 depending on soil N availability, rhizobium strain and drought level while under controlled conditions (in the greenhouse and use of hydroponic system) %Ndfa values could be higher due to effective inoculation with rhizobium strain in the absence of N supply (Hardarson et al. 1993a; Kipe-Nolt and Giller 1993; Kipe-Nolt et al. 1993b; Giller 2001; Douxchamps et al. 2010; Kamfwa et al. 2015; Polania et al. 2016).
Several researchers found a negative exponential relationship between rate of applied N fertilizer and N2 fixation and strong reduction of SNF under drought conditions (Leidi and Rodríguez-Navarro 2000; Wanek and Arndt 2002; Salvagiotti et al. 2008; Ramaekers et al. 2013; Devi et al. 2013; Beebe et al. 2014; Burchill et al. 2014; Polania et al. 2016). However, climbing beans exhibited higher SNF ability than bush bean, with a mean % N derived from the atmosphere (%Ndfa) value of 60% which is greater than reported bush bean values (Unkovich and Pate 2000; Hardarson and Atkins 2003; Ramaekers et al. 2013). Additionally, climbing beans are also capable of 40% higher yield potential compared to bush beans and show positive association between the climbing growth habit and SNF ability (Graham and Rosas 1977; Bliss 1993; Kipe-Nolt and Giller 1993; Graham and Vance 2000). Among the few reports of SNF in climbing beans, cv. Caballero was found to be efficient in SNF with values greater than 50% Ndfa and 81 kg N ha−1 fixed without abiotic stress limitation (Manrique et al. 1993). Thus identifying parental climbing bean genotypes that combine superior SNF ability with greater seed yield and higher tolerance to drought stress could be an important breeding strategy to improve bean production under unfavorable climatic conditions in marginal areas where improving food and nutritional security is a major challenge.
Use of natural abundance of 15N is considered as one of the best methods to quantify SNF in terms of %Ndfa, because it allows the estimation of N fixation in almost any situation where both N-fixing and non N-fixing plants are present at the same location (Unkovich et al. 2008; Douxchamps et al. 2010). Also, it allows to separate %Ndfa from % N derived from the soil (%Ndfs) (Boddey et al. 2000). This method normally uses shoot tissue, however, the evaluation of shoot tissue means high labor costs for plant breeding programs that deal with large number of breeding lines. Also, utilization of shoot biomass samples is complex because destructive sampling of the plot requires processing of a large quantity of material. Polania et al. (2016) validated the use of seed samples to quantity %Ndfa and found significantly positive association between %Ndfa from shoot and %Ndfa from seed in bush beans based on the principle that common beans mobilize much of their N from vegetative structures to the seed. For breeding programs on climbing beans, the higher shoot biomass production per plant compared to bush beans makes it even more difficult to use 15N method to quantify SNF in shoot tissue. Thus there is a need to validate the use of seed samples for estimating genotypic differences in SNF ability.
The main objectives of this study were to: (i) quantify genotypic differences in SNF ability of climbing beans using 15N natural abundance method; (ii) identify genotypes that combine high SNF ability with high yield potential that could serve as parents in the breeding program; and (iii) test whether δ15N in seed can be used instead of δ15N in shoot for estimating SNF ability in climbing beans.
Materials and methods
Experimental site and meteorological conditions
Field trials were conducted at two locations in Colombia: on a farm at Darien (June to September 2014) and at the CIAT Experimental Station at Popayan (June to September in 2015). Before establishing the field trials, soil chemical characteristics were determined for each field site by collecting 9 soil samples (0–20 cm soil depth) to represent spatial variability within the experimental area. The following characteristics were determined: soil organic matter (SOM) content, total N content, plant available N, available P concentration, and initial population and post-inoculation population of Rhizobium (cfu g−1 soil) using most probable number (MPN) technique (CGIAR and IRRI 1990). These data were used to map spatial variability in soil pH and soil P (Bray II extraction) availability (Bray and Kurtz 1945). Field site at Darien is located at 3°55′N and 76°28′W, with an altitude of 1600 m above sea level (masl). Field site at Popayán is located at 2°25′39″ N and 76°37′17″ W with an altitude of 1750 masl. The soil at both sites is an Inceptisol (Typic Dystrandept) and the differences in soil characteristics are shown in Table 1. The two locations differed mainly in altitude, soil nitrogen availability and rainfall distribution. Rainfall distribution, irrigation events and temperature changes during crop growing period at Darien and Popayan were recorded (Fig. 1). At Darien location, the total accumulated rainfall was 170 mm plus 120 mm of supplemental irrigation corresponding to a total water applied as 290 mm during crop growth. In contrast, at Popayan, total rainfall accumulation was 275 mm without any supplementary irrigation and 80% of total rainfall was noted before 40 days after sowing while the rest of growth cycle (80 days) received only 55.4 mm resulting in terminal drought stress during seed filling period.
Both trials were established using 2800 m2 field area at each field site without application of N fertilizer. Other nutrients were applied (kg ha−1) as 40 P (as GranoFOS 40®), 30 K, 54 Ca, 25 S, 18 Mg and a mix of essential micronutrients (Microcoljab R). Fertilizer was applied at the time of sowing. Additionally, weeds were controlled by application of herbicides, pests and diseases were controlled by application of insecticides and fungicides, as needed. Total rainfall during the active crop growth was 290 mm in 2014 at Darien and 275 mm in 2015 at Popayan. The trial at Darien was supplemented with irrigation (120 mm) to minimize drought effects during seed filling period. But the trial at Popayan had limited rainfall during seed filling period (32.5 mm) which resulted in terminal type of drought stress (Fig. 1).
Plant material and bacterial strain
The plant materials consisted of 100 bean genotypes, including 67 ENF lines, 13 CGA lines, 2 MBC lines, 9 MAC lines, and 9 further genotypes including checks GLORIABAMBA NN, D. MORENO, BOLIVAR and accessions G 19839, G 2333 and G 5702. Out of the 100 bean genotypes, 98 genotypes used were climbing beans. ENF lines were developed from intra- and inter-gene pool single and double crosses to combine resistance to different diseases. CGA lines have commercial grain type including major market classes of red, red mottled, cream mottled, white and yellow color. MBC lines referred to Mid-altitude BCMNV resistant climbing types. The checks included G5702 (super nodulating) and two parental lines G2333 (climbing bean) and G19839 (bush bean) that were evaluated previously by Ramaekers et al. (2013). Another important check was Gloriabamba non-nodulating (NN) genotype. The seven MAC lines referred to mid-altitude climbing lines MAC 4, MAC 9, MAC 33, MAC 74, MAC 56, MAC 25, MAC 57 that are currently grown in mid-altitude environments as climbing beans with high yield potential and good commercial grain type. Seed material was supplied by the Andean Bean Breeding team of CIAT, Cali, Colombia.
All genotypes were inoculated with Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899. The inoculum preparation was carried out following the methodology reported by Remans et al. (2008). Briefly, the strain was grown overnight in Liquid Yeast Mannitol agar medium at 30 °C and at pH 6.8. These liquid cultures were washed twice with 10 mM MgSO4 and suspended in 10 mM MgSO4 at a density of 107 colony forming units per ml (cfu/ml). For the field experiment, 30 ml of this inoculum was injected into sterilized humus in air-closed plastic bags (50 g humus per bag). The humus was thoroughly mixed and left at room temperature for 7 days (mixed once a day). The inoculation was carried out by soil drenching at 8 and 15 days after emergence (DAE) of the trials.
Experimental design
Experiments at Darien and Popayán consisted of a 10 × 10 alpha-lattice design with three replications and with a total of 600 rows. The experimental units consisted of two rows of 2.5 m long with a row–to-row distance of 1.0 m and plant-to-plant spacing of 10 cm which is equivalent to 25 seeds per row.
Determination of morpho-physiological traits and symbiotic nitrogen fixation ability (%Ndfa) using shoot and seed tissue
Out of the two rows planted for each genotype in each replication, one row was used for determining morpho-physiological traits and the other row was used for seed yield determination. Morpho-physiological traits were measured at three different growth stages of the crop: flowering, mid-pod fill and harvest. Phenology was monitored by recording days to flowering (number of days from sowing until 50% of plants with at least one open flower in a plot) and days to physiological maturity (number of days from sowing until at least 90% of the plants reach physiological maturity) as described by Ambachew et al. (2015). At each growth stage, a 0.5 m long row of six plants was harvested. At flowering growth stage (R6), genotypic differences in nodulation ability using three plants within a row were visually estimated using a scale of 1–9 where 1 was poor nodulation and 9 was high nodulation ability. This nodulation score was based on: estimation of number of nodules, nodule size, homogeneity of three roots, nodules abundance and viability (van Schoonhoven and Pastor-Corrales 1987).
Using six plants within a row (0.5 m), shoot biomass (SB) and dry matter distribution among plant parts (leaf and stem) were determined by drying the plant tissue in an oven at 60 °C for 2 days. At mid-pod fill growth stage (R7–8), SPAD chlorophyll meter readings (SCMR as SPAD units) were taken on fully expanded young leaves of 10 plants within a row using a SPAD chlorophyll meter (SPAD-502 Chlorophyll Meter, Minolta Camera Co., Ltd., Japan). At harvest time (R9), one full row was used for estimating seed yield (Yd) in kg ha−1 and 0.5 m length of a second row was used to determine yield components (pod number per plant, seed number per pod, seed and pod dry weight, 100 seed weight). Pod harvest index (PHI, seed dry weight at harvest/pod dry weight at harvest × 100), nitrogen use efficiency (NUE, kg of grain produced per kg of N in shoot biomass) and nitrogen partitioning index (NPI, kg of N in seed/kg of N in shoot biomass at mid-pod fill) were also determined.
The oven-dried samples of shoot and seed tissue were finely ground using a ball-mill and weighed using a microbalance (Sartorius Cubis® Germany) to pack 3.0 mg of each sample in a tin capsule. Samples were sent to University of California-Davis Stable Isotope Laboratory Facility in USA for 15N isotope analyses, δ15N and total N concentration (%) were measured using a PDZ Europa ANCA-GSL elemental analyzer interfaced to a PDZ Europa 20–20 isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Sercon Ltd., Cheshire, UK; Sharp 2005). %Ndfa_Sh and %Ndfa_Sd (N derived from atmosphere in shoot and seed) were calculated for each experimental unit following the equation given by Shearer and Kohl (1986):
Where β is the δ15N value from the nitrogen-fixing genotype grown in N-free medium (sand culture). The B-value, i.e. the isotopic fractionation during N2 fixation, was obtained from a pot experiment in the greenhouse at the International Centre of Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Colombia (3°29′N, 76°2′W), following the procedure of Unkovich et al. (2008). Seventy five (75) pots were filled with washed white quartz, planted with bean with different growth stages and habits corresponding to flowering, mid pod fill and harvest; the genotypes used were CAL 96 (habit I), SMC 140 (II), GGR18(III), MAC 33 (IV) and non nodulate control BAT 477 NN. Watered daily with an N-free nutrient solution Norris and Date 1976) containing (per liter of deionized water) KH2PO4 (0.27 g), K2SO4 (0.35 g), CaSO4·2H2O (1.0), MgSO4·7H2O (0.25 g), HBO3 (4.0 mg), MnCl 2·4H2O (0.99 mg), ZnSO4·7H2O (0.58 mg), CuSO4·5H2O (0.125 mg), FeCl3·6H2O (5.4 mg), and Na2MoO4·2H2O (0.1 mg). The inoculum used was CIAT 899 10 × 107 UFC/ml. Shoot and grain δ15N values were corrected for seed N effect using a mass balance (Boddey et al. 2000; Nebiyu et al. 2014) .
To determine β we used MAC 33 to represent climbing beans. Different β values were used to determine Ndfa from shoot biomass and seed (Polania et al. 2016; Pacheco et al. 2017). We used the β-value of −3.32‰ for Ndfa_Sh at mid-pod fill growth stage and − 2.78 for Ndfa_Sd for the seed at harvest time.
Total Ndfs (N derived from soil, TNdfs) and Total Ndfa (N derived from atmosphere, TNdfa) per unit area were estimated using the following formulas:
Statistical analysis
All data were analyzed using the SAS (v 9.0) PROC MIXED and PROC CORR (SAS Institute Inc., 2008). The adjusted means for each genotype and the environment (Darien and Popayan) were obtained using the mixed models theory together with the MIXED procedure considering the effects of the replications and blocks within replications as random and genotypes as fixed. Correlation coefficients were calculated by the PROC CORR. Values marked with *, ** or *** are statistically significant at probability levels of 5%, 1% and 0.1%, respectively. The relationship between traits at the phenotypic level was assessed using PRINCOMP procedure for principal components analysis (PCA) (SAS Institute Inc., 2008).
Results
Genotypic differences in SNF ability in relation to environmental conditions
Environmental conditions can influence the SNF characteristics and this influence can vary among genotypes. Climbing bean lines showed genotypic differences in SNF ability in terms of %Ndfa under different soil and rainfall distribution conditions at Darien and Popayan (Table 2). Although both sites had similar total water supply during the growth season, at Popayan only 20% of total rainfall was observed beyond 40 days after sowing, leading to terminal drought stress during the seed filling period affecting SNF ability and seed yield (Fig. 1). In addition, the soil N availability at Popayan was higher than at Darien 72.4 and 26.6 kg ha−1, respectively, and this condition could suppress the SNF process (Table 1). Soil conditions such as soil organic matter content, soil pH and soil P availability were favorable at both locations. Based on the soil and climatic conditions, the Darien location can be considered more favorable than Popayan for the SNF process.
Genotypic differences in morpho-physiological traits, seed yield and SNF characteristics
Genotypes could vary in their SNF ability measured in terms of Ndfa_Sh or Ndfa_Sd and these differences can influence seed yield. Results on genotypic variation in morpho-physiological traits, seed yield, N efficiency traits and SNF characteristics of 100 genotypes of common bean grown at two locations are shown in Table 2. Genotypic differences in SNF traits showed that the values of SNF ability were greater at Darien than at Popayan location (41.3 and 34.4 %Ndfa_Sd, respectively) with significant differences (p < 0.05). Also the %Ndfa_Sh values were higher at Darien than at Popayan corresponding to 24.6 and 19.1% (p < 0.05), respectively. Mean nodule score of the 100 genotypes was also higher at Darien than at Popayan based on nodule number, viability and size. (Table 2).
The genotype effects and the GxE interaction effects were significant (p < 0.05) for majority of morpho-physiological traits (Table 2). In contrast, few traits such as TN_Sd, TNdfs_Sd and pod harvest index were not affected by the environment (location). Values of both shoot biomass accumulation and TN_Sh were higher at Popayan showing greater N accumulation in shoot biomass together with lower level of N partitioning to seed (lower values of NPI) (Table 2).
Evaluating the relationships between seed yield and SNF ability among the genotypes could help to identify promising genotypes that combine greater ability in SNF with higher values of seed yield. Relationships between seed yield and SNF ability in terms of %Ndfa_Sd, TNdfa and TNdfs were positive and significant at Darien. The correlation coefficient between seed yield and %Ndfa_Sd at Darien was small but significant (r = 0.14*) (Fig. 2). In contrast at Popayan where the conditions for SNF were unfavorable, the correlation between seed yield and %Ndfa_Sd was not significant. Several genotypes were identified that combine greater values of seed yield above 3000 kg ha−1 with moderate to high values of %Ndfa and TNdfa at both locations (Table 3). Seven lines ENF 235, ENF 28, PO07AT49, ENF 234, ENF 21, CGA 10 and MAC 27 were promising in their SNF ability by maintaining higher values of %Ndfa and seed yield (Table 3). MAC 27 was among the high yielding genotypes and this line also showed greater SNF ability in terms of %Ndfa_Sd and moderate values of %Ndfa_Sh (Table 3). The non-nodulating Gloriabamba genotype and some genotypes identified as non-promising such as ENF 81, CGA 11 and ENF 213, showed lower values of seed yields together with lower values of %Ndfa at both locations (Table 3). Nevertheless, these genotypes showed greater values of TNdfs at Popayan (Table 2) where the available N in soil was higher (Table 1). The highest seed yield correlations were observed with TNdfs and TN_Sd, but the former were more positive at Popayan (r = 0.91***) than at Darien (r = 0.75***). In contrast, TNdfs_Sd values showed significantly negative correlations with %Ndfa_Sh and %Ndfa_Sd, more strongly at Darien with r = −0.67*** and − 0.34 *** for Popayan, respectively, showing the negative influence of high soil N availability on SNF ability (Table. 4).
Genotypes could vary not only in their SNF ability but also in their ability to use N for the production of seed (NUE). Relationships of TNdfa_Sh with shoot biomass and NUE at two locations are shown in Fig. 3. Shoot biomass production values showed significantly lower correlation with TNdfa_Sh values at Darien (r = 0.48**) than at Popayan (r = 0.60***). At Popayan, ENF 167 was outstanding in its shoot biomass production while ENF 159 was outstanding for TNdfa_Sh (Fig. 3). Higher values of TNdfa_Sh at Darien were observed with ENF 182 and ENF 173. Relationship between NUE and TNdfa_Sh was positive and significant at Darien (r = 0.12*) and at Popayan r = 0.31**. The highest NUE value was observed at Darien with PO 07A T57 while MAC 27 was superior at Popayan (Fig. 3).
The values of NUE in terms of seed yield per unit of N uptake were 51% higher at Darien than at Popayan. In the same sense, the extent of N remobilized from shoot to seed (NPI) was 53% higher, similarly, pod harvest index which reflects the extent of photosynthate mobilization from pod wall to seed (Rao et al. 2013) was also 6% higher at Darien. This greater ability to mobilize photosynthates to seed at Darien correlated positively (r = 0.24**) with greater mean value of seed yield observed at Darien (Table 4). In accordance, at Popayan seed yield was decreased by 12% compared to Darien (Table. 2) and SNF traits values such as nodulation score, as % Ndfa and TNdfa showed a decrease of 7% and 14%, respectively (Table 2). Taken together, higher yields at Darien are the result of less investment in biomass and more efficient mobilization of N and C to seed.
The values of NUE at Darien showed a highly significant (p < 0.001) correlation with SNF traits corresponding to %Ndfa_Sh, %Ndfa_Sd, TNdfa_Sh, TNdfa_Sd (Table 4). In contrast, at Popayan no correlation was observed between %Ndfa and NUE. However, the genotypes ENF 235, ENF 21, CGA 10, PO07AT49 and MAC 27 were superior in combining higher values of NUE with greater values of TNdfa at both locations (Fig. 3).
Principal component analysis
The relative contribution of different plant traits to SNF ability or seed yield can be evaluated using PC analysis. Since the PC analysis showed no significant difference between the two locations (Darien and Popayan) we have conducted combined analysis using data from both locations (Table 5). Seed yield was primarily associated with N availability from soil (TNdfs_Sh) and also to %Ndfa. The capacity to partition N to seed (NPI) and efficient use of N in seed production (NUE) showed good relationship (Table 5). Multivariate analysis of the results from both locations showed that the first three components of PC analysis could explain 83% of the variability observed in the SNF characteristics of 100 genotypes evaluated at two locations (Table 5). In component 1, the plant traits with the largest contribution to variability were: TN_Sh, TNdfs_Sh, %Ndfa_Sd, NUE and NPI. In component 2, the traits with the largest contribution to variability were: shoot biomass, TN_Sd, TNdfs_Sd and seed yield. In component 3, SNF characteristics such as nodulation score, TNdfa_Sd and TNdfa-Sh had larger contribution (Table 5).
Comparison of two methods to estimate %Ndfa
We tested the relationship between %Ndfa_Sd measured using harvested seeds and %Ndfa_Sh measured at mid-pod filling growth stage at both locations. We found that individually, the correlations were both positive and highly significant for each location (Darien, r = 0. 42***; Popayan, r = 0.46***) (Table 4). We found an even stronger relationship between the Darien-Popayan mean values of %Ndfa_Sh and %Ndfa_sd (r = 0.55 ***). Additionally, we also found that the values of Ndfa_Sd were greater than those of Ndfa_Sh. For promising genotypes such as PO07AT49 and ENF 235 the %Ndfa value between shoot and seed differed by 24%. In contrast, a non promising genotype ENF 194 showed the values of Ndfa_Sd as 21% and Ndfa_Sh only 15% (Fig. 4).
Discussion
Genotypic differences in SNF ability
This study enabled to quantify genotypic differences in SNF ability in terms of %Ndfa and TNdfa in climbing bean and identified promising lines that combine high values of seed yield with SNF ability in an elite set of breeding lines (ENF). These lines were developed for improving seed yield and resistance to diseases such as anthracnose and bean common mosaic virus, which are important traits for bean improvement (Beebe 2012). This is the first report on the elite ENF climbing bean lines, quantifying the genotypic differences in SNF ability.
Farmers require high yielding plants in low input farming systems. High %Ndfa in combination with high seed yield is a way to produce high yields in low N fields without high fertilizer inputs. Furthermore, as most shoot biomass is used as animal fodder or incorporated in soil, high TNdfa referring to kg N fixed, helps farmers to produce N with lower inputs. The efficiency of major food crops in the recovery of applied N is often not more than 30% (Subbarao et al. 2013) and 60 kg N fixed through SNF would therefore be comparable to about 160 kg N applied as chemical fertilizer (Polania et al. 2016).
Significant genotypic variation in SNF ability and seed yield was reported using bush bean genotypes (Hardarson et al. 1993b; Kipe-Nolt and Giller 1993; Kipe-Nolt et al. 1993; Manrique et al. 1993; Douxchamps et al. 2010; Kamfwa et al. 2015; Polania et al. 2016). Results from this study on climbing beans support previous work which showed that climbing beans tend to have higher SNF potential as well as higher yield potential compared to bush beans, with a potential for SNF ability of over 90 kg N ha−1 (Giller 2001).
The process of SNF is affected by multiple stress factors, such as drought (Devi et al. 2013; Polania et al. 2016), low P availability in soil (Leidi and Rodríguez-Navarro 2000; Olivera et al. 2004; Ojiem 2006) and high nitrate or ammonium availability in soil that strongly suppresses SNF process (Giller 2001; Wanek and Arndt 2002; Salvagiotti et al. 2008; Burchill et al. 2014). Field evaluation at Popayan with soil having high SOM and high N availability together with terminal drought stress condition reduced the %Ndfa, TNdfa, NUE and seed yield. Our results are consistent with previous reports. Additionally, under higher N availability, the TNdfs was strongly correlated with TNdfa in spite of the positive effect of TNdfa on seed yield. These results indicate that TNdfs was a major contributor to plant N supply and seed yield formation for common bean. Thus simultaneous improvement for SNF ability and seed yield through breeding may impose some limitations to breeding efforts for some genotypes. Our results confirm previously reported detrimental factors to SNF and also indicate that there are marked differences in SNF ability under unfavorable conditions such as higher N availability combined with drought stress in soil (Giller 2001; Wanek and Arndt 2002; Salvagiotti et al. 2008; Burchill et al. 2014). In spite of this negative effect, there were promising genotypes that have shown less sensitivity to this condition, maintaining good values of %Ndfa and TNdfa across both field sites.
Our results have shown that the ability to remobilize and utilize N (NUE and NPI) was decreased by higher level of N availability and drought stress at Popayan where the mean value of NPI to seed was markedly reduced by about 53% and NUE by 48%.
The lower values of %Ndfa_Sd of climbing bean lines observed at Popayan were associated with higher values of SCMR, shoot biomass and also TN_Sh at mid-pod filling growth stage compared to the values observed at Darien. It is known that greater level of N accumulation in leaves and shoot tissue could inhibit SNF process by Autoregulation of Nodulation AON (Vadez and Sinclair 2001; Purcell et al. 2004; King and Purcell 2005). Using common bean, Coleto et al. (2014) showed that the variability in drought-induced inhibition of SNF was associated with accumulation of N in shoot tissue but not in nodules. This is in accordance with the increased accumulation contrasted by reduced remobilization of N from vegetative structures to seed (NUE and NPI) at Popayan.
Common bean lines can remobilize about 80% to 93% of its total N in the shoot to the seed under optimal conditions for SNF process (Ramaekers et al. 2013). Also, it has been shown that common bean accumulates preferentially the atmospherically fixed N into the seed (Westermann et al. 1985; Dubois and Burris 1986; Wolyn et al. 1991). Our results confirm these previous reports since the values of %Ndfa_Sd were 16% higher than those of %Ndfa_Sh at both locations.
At Darien, a few lines were very efficient in their SNF ability fixing about 90 kg N ha−1 based on TNdfa_Sd and TNdfa_Sh which is equivalent to 300 kg of applied fertilizer at 30% fertilizer efficiency while the best lines at Popayan fixed only up to 60 kg N ha−1. Vigorous plants permit higher levels of N accumulation to seeds if the plants could maintain greater ability to remobilize photosynthates (Polania et al. 2016). The high correlation between TNdfa_Sd and TNdfs_Sd at Popayan suggest low variability between the two uptake processes, these traits are driven by variability in seed. In contrast this correlation was not observed at Darien where the lines were more efficient and showed greater variability in SNF ability. Hence, TNdfa performance at low soil N availability could be increased genetically by breeding.
Identification of promising lines with greater seed N and SNF ability under stress
Seven climbing bean genotypes (ENF 235, PO07AT49, CGA 10, ENF 28, ENF 21, ENF 234, MAC 27) reduced their SNF ability by only about 15% under high N availability and drought stress and these were considered as promising genotypes. This is because they were also superior in SNF ability and seed yield at Darien under low N availability. We found that the relationship between %Ndfa_Sd at Darien and %Ndfa_Sd at Popayan was positive and significant and these results are consistent with the results obtained by Polania et al. (2016) where the trait of %Ndfa_Sd showed positive and significant correlation between irrigated and drought stress conditions. Taken together, these results indicate that %Ndfa trait could be considered as stable across environments.
Validation of the use of 15N natural abundance in seed as a method to quantify genotypic differences in SNF ability in climbing bean
This study allowed not only to quantify genotypic differences in climbing bean for SNF ability, but also to compare the estimation of %Ndfa using seed tissue (%Ndfa_Sd) vs. shoot tissue (%Ndfa_Sh). We used the β values of mid-pod filling growth stage for shoot biomass and harvest time for seed since it was shown from recent studies that β values are influenced by plant development in common bean (Polania et al. 2016; Pacheco et al. 2017). Past publications often used SNF in biomass at mid-pod fill, which is more representative for the whole N fixed, %TNdfa-Sh has often been used to infer desirable breeding traits in seed. %Ndfa_Sh is relevant for farming systems where biomass is used as animal food and/or fixed N remaining in soil improves soil quality. We consider that it is possible to replace measurement of %Ndfa_Sh with %Ndfa_Sd. We recommend the use of seed tissue since %Ndfa_Sd is more informative about protein for consumption in combination with TN_Sd. Recently, Polania et al. (2016) validated the usefulness of %Ndfa_Sd as a selection method to quantify phenotypic differences among bush bean lines grown under irrigated and drought stress conditions. Kamfwa et al. (2015) also used both shoot and seed samples to quantify SNF ability and suggested that selection for high SNF ability based on seed tissue analysis could be easier to integrate into most bean breeding programs. Similar results for %Ndfa using the 15N natural abundance technique in seed and the whole shoot have also been reported for other legume species (Bergersen et al. 1985).
We tested whether %Ndfa_Sd could be a useful method for selecting genotypes with superior SNF ability in on-going breeding programs. Results from two locations estimated under field conditions from shoot tissue at mid-pod filling growth stage (%Ndfa_Sh) and using seed tissue at harvest (%Ndfa_Sd), showed that Ndfa values from seed are suitable to quantify genotypic differences in SNF ability. The highly significant and positive correlation (r = 0.55***) observed between both methods using data from both locations validates the usefulness of %Ndfa_Sd as a selection method for %Ndfa_Sh. The use of seed tissue to estimate SNF ability could be implemented in on-going breeding programs to reduce costs in collecting and analyzing shoot tissue. Several bean breeding programs working on biofortified beans are aiming to increase iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) levels in the seed (Blair et al. 2011). These programs currently use finely ground seed tissue to estimate Fe and Zn concentration in grain. The same ground tissue can be used to estimate SNF ability, lowering costs and processing time, so that improved bean lines that combine more desirable traits can be developed.
Conclusions
Significant genotypic differences were observed in SNF ability among climbing beans at two field locations. %Ndfa and seed yield values were higher at Darien (site with low available N in soil) than at Popayan (site with higher available N in soil with terminal drought stress) and we found a positive association between SNF ability and seed yield. The line MAC 27 was outstanding in SNF ability and seed yield while seven genotypes (ENF 235, ENF 234, ENF 28, ENF 21, PO 07AT49, CGA 10) also exhibited superior performance. These promising lines also combined other desirable plant traits such as greater level of shoot biomass production, total N uptake in shoot biomass, and greater ability to partition a higher proportion of N to seed. These lines could serve as potential parents for breeding programs aiming to combine SNF ability and yield potential with other desirable traits like biotic stress resistance. In addition, this study validated the usefulness of using seed tissue to estimate SNF ability of climbing beans. This methodology could be implemented in on-going breeding programs to reduce costs in collecting and analyzing shoot tissue.
Abbreviations
- DF:
-
Days to flowering
- DPM:
-
Days to physiological maturity
- TNdfs:
-
Nitrogen derived from soil per hectare
- TNdfa:
-
Nitrogen derived from the atmosphere per hectare
- %Ndfa_Sd:
-
Percentage of nitrogen derived from the atmosphere using seed
- %Ndfa_Sh:
-
Percentage of nitrogen derived from the atmosphere using shoot
- NENCB:
-
Nodule score (1–9)
- %N_Sh:
-
Nitrogen content in shoot in per cent
- %N_Sd:
-
Nitrogen content in seed in per cent
- TN_Sh:
-
Total nitrogen in shoot per hectare
- TN_Sd:
-
Total nitrogen in seed per hectare
- SB:
-
Shoot biomass at mid-pod filling
- SOM:
-
Soil organic matter
- SCMR:
-
SPAD chlorophyll meter reading
- Yd:
-
Seed yield per hectare
- PHI:
-
Pod harvest index
- NPI:
-
Nitrogen partitioning index
- NUE:
-
Nitrogen use efficiency
References
Ambachew D, Mekbib F, Asfaw A, Beebe SE, Blair MW (2015) Trait associations in common bean genotypes grown under drought stress and field infestation by BSM bean fly. Crop J 3:305–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2015.01.006
Beebe S (2012) Common bean breeding in the tropics. Plant Breed Rev 36:357–426. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358566
Beebe SE, Rao IM, Cajiao C, Grajales M (2008) Selection for drought resistance in common bean also improves yield in phosphorus limited and favorable environments. Crop Sci 48:582–592. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.07.0404
Beebe SE, Rao IM, Devi MJ, Polania J (2014) Common beans, biodiversity, and multiple stresses: challenges of drought resistance in tropical soils. Crop Pasture Sci 65:667–675. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP13303
Bergersen F, Turner G, Gault R, Chase D, Brockwell J (1985) The natural abundance of 15N in an irrigated soybean crop and its use for the calculation of nitrogen fixation. Aust J Agric Res 36:411–490. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9850411
Blair MW, Astudillo C, Rengifo J, Beebe SE, Graham R (2011) QTL analyses for seed iron and zinc concentrations in an intra-genepool population of Andean common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor Appl Genet 122:511–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1465-8
Bliss FA (1993) Breeding common bean for improved biological nitrogen fixation. Plant Soil 152:71–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2100-2_6
Boddey RM, Peoples MB, Palmer B, Dart PJ (2000) Use of the 15N natural abundance technique to quantify biological nitrogen fixation by woody perennials. Nut Cycl Agroecosyst 57:235–270. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009890514844
Bray RH, Kurtz LT (1945) Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci 59:39–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194501000-00006
Burchill W, James EK, Li D, Lanigan GJ, Williams M, PPM I, Humphreys J (2014) Comparisons of biological nitrogen fixation in association with white clover (Trifolium repens L.) under four fertiliser nitrogen inputs as measured using two 15N techniques. Plant Soil 385:287–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2199-1
Coleto I, Pineda M, Rodiño AP, De Ron AM, Alamillo JM (2014) Comparison of inhibition of N2 fixation and ureide accumulation under water deficit in four common bean genotypes of contrasting drought tolerance. Ann Bot 113:1071–1082. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcu029
Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research., International Rice Research Institute. (1990) Legume-rhizobium Symbiosis: methods manual for agronomic evaluation, seleccion and managment. In: Sylvester Bradley Kipe-Nolt (ed) Publications of the international agricultural research and development. Consultative group on international agricultural research (CGIAR), p 332
Devi MJ, Sinclair TR, Beebe SE, Rao IM (2013) Comparison of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes for nitrogen fixation tolerance to soil drying. Plant Soil 364:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1330-4
Douxchamps S, Humbert F-L, van der Hoek R, Mena M, Bernasconi SM, Schmidt A, Oberson A (2010) Nitrogen balances in farmers fields under alternative uses of a cover crop legume: a case study from Nicaragua. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 88:447–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-010-9368-2
Dubois JD, Burris RH (1986) Comparative study of N uptake and distribution in three lines of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) at early pod filling stage. Plant Soil 93:79–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02377147
Giller KE (2001) Nitrogen fixation in tropical cropping systems. CABI Pub
Graham PH, Rosas JC (1977) Growth and development of indeterminate bush and climbing cultivars of Phaseolus vulgaris L. inoculated with rhizobium. J Agric Sci (UK) 88:503–508. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600035024
Graham PH, Vance CP (2000) Nitrogen fixation in perspective: an overview of research and extension needs. F Crop Res 65:93–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(99)00080-5
Hardarson G, Atkins C (2003) Optimising biological N2 fixation by legumes in farming systems. Plant Soil 252:41–54. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024103818971
Hardarson G, Bliss FA, Cigales-Rivero MR, Henson RA., Kipe-Nolt JA., Longeri L. Tsai SM. (1993) Genotypic variation in biological nitrogen fixation by common bean. In: Enhancement of biological nitrogen fixation of common bean in Latin America. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 59–70
Herridge DF, Peoples MB, Boddey RM (2008) Global inputs of biological nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. Plant Soil 311:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9668-3
Kamfwa K, Cichy KA, Kelly JD (2015) Genome-wide association analysis of symbiotic nitrogen fixation in common bean. Theor Appl Genet 128:1999–2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-015-2562-5
King CA, Purcell LC (2005) Inhibition of N2 fixation in soybean is associated with elevated ureides and amino acids. Plant Physiol 137:1389–1396. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.056317
Kipe-Nolt JA, Giller KE (1993) A field evaluation using the 15N isotope dilution method of lines of Phaseolus vulgaris L. bred for increased nitrogen fixation. In: Enhancement of biological nitrogen fixation of common bean in Latin America. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 107–114
Kipe-Nolt JA, Vargas H, Giller KE (1993) Nitrogen fixation in breeding lines of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Plant Soil 152:103–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00016338
Leidi EO, Rodríguez-Navarro DN (2000) Nitrogen and phosphorus availability limit N2 fixation in bean. New Phytol 147:337–346. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00703.x
Mafongoya PL, Mpepereki S, Mudyazhezha S (2009) The importance of biological nitrogen fixation in cropping systems in nonindustrialized nations. In: Emerich DW, Krishnan H, Mafongoya PL, et al. (eds) Nitrogen fixation in crop production. American Society of Agronomy, crop science Society of America, soil science Society of America, pp 329–348
Manrique A, Manrique K, Nakahodo J (1993) Yield and biological nitrogen fixation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Peru. Plant Soil 152:87–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00016336
Nebiyu A, Huygens D, Upadhayay H, Diels Y, Boeckx P (2014) Importance of B value determination to quantify biological N2 fixation and N balances of faba beans (Vicia faba L.) via 15N natural balance. Biol Fetil Soils 50:517–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0874-7
Ojiem J. (2006) Exploring socio-ecological niches for legumes in western Kenya smallholder farming systems. Tropical resource management papers (documents Sur la Gestlon des Ressources Tropicales). Wageningen University
Olivera M, Tejera N, Iribarne C, Ocana A, Lluch C (2004) Growth, nitrogen fixation and ammonium assimilation in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): effect of phosphorus. Physiol Plant 121:498–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0031-9317.2004.00355.x
Pacheco R, Boddey R, Alves BJ, Straliotto R, Araújo AP (2017) Growth patterns of common bean cultivars affect the ‘B’ value required to quantify biological N2 fixation using the 15N natural abundance technique. Plant Soil 419:293–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3331-9
Peoples MB, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Jensen ES (2009) The potential environmental benefits and risks derived from legumes in rotations. In: Emerich DW, Krishnan H, Peoples MB et al (eds) Nitrogen fixation in crop production. Crop Science Society of America, USA
Polania J, Poschenrieder C, Rao I, Beebe S (2016) Estimation of phenotypic variability in symbiotic nitrogen fixation ability of common bean under drought stress using 15 N natural abundance in grain. Eur J Agron 79:66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.05.014
Purcell LC, Serraj R, Sinclair TR, De A (2004) Soybean N fixation estimates, ureide concentration, and yield responses to drought. Crop Sci 44:484–490. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.4840
Ramaekers L, Galeano CH, Garzón N, Vanderleyden J, Blair MW (2013) Identifying quantitative trait loci for symbiotic nitrogen fixation capacity and related traits in common bean. Mol Breed 31:163–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-012-9780-1
Rao IM (2014) Advances in improving adaptation of common bean and brachiaria forage grasses to abiotic stress in the tropics. In: Pessarakli M (ed) Handbook of plant and crop physiology, third edit. CRC press, pp 847–889
Rao IM, Beebe S, Polania J, Ricaurte J, Caijiao C, Garcia R, Rivera M (2013) Can tepary bean be a model for improvement of drought resistance in common bean? Afr Crop Sci J 21:265–281
Remans R, Ramaekers L, Schelkens S, Hernandez G, Garcia A, Reyes JL, Vanderleyden J (2008) Effect of rhizobium–Azospirillum coinoculation on nitrogen fixation and yield of two contrasting Phaseolus vulgaris L. genotypes cultivated across different environments in Cuba. Plant Soil 312:25–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9606-4
Salvagiotti F, Cassman KG, Specht JE, Walters DT, Weiss A, Dobermann A (2008) Nitrogen uptake, fixation and response to fertilizer N in soybeans: a review. F Crop Res 108:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2008.03.001
Shearer G, Kohl DH (1986) N2 fixation in field settings: estimates based on natural 15N abundance. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 13:699–756
Subbarao GV, Rao IM, Nakahara K, Ando Y, Sahrawat KL, Tesfamariam T, Peters M (2013) Nitrogen management in grasslands and forage-based production systems – role of biological nitrification inhibition (BNI). Trop Grasslands-Forrajes Trop 1:168–174. https://doi.org/10.17138/TGFT(1)168-174
Unkovich MJ, Herridge D, Peoples M, Cadisch G., Boddey B., Giller K., Chalk P. (2008) Measuring plant-associated nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. ACIAR Monograph Series. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. 258 p. ISBN 1921531266
Unkovich MJ, Pate JS (2000) An appraisal of recent field measurements of symbiotic N2 fixation by annual legumes. F Crops Res 65:211–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(99)00088-X
Vadez V, Sinclair TR (2001) Leaf ureide degradation and N(2) fixation tolerance to water deficit in soybean. J Exp Bot 52:153–159. https://doi.org/10.2307/23696878
Vance CP (2001) Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and phosphorus acquisition. Plant nutrition in a world of declining renewable resources. Plant Physiol 127:390–397
van Schoonhoven A, Pastor-Corrales MA (1987) Sistema estándar para la evaluación de germoplasma de frijol. CIAT, Cali, Colombia
Wanek W, Arndt SK (2002) Difference in delta (15) N signatures between nodulated roots and shoots of soybean is indicative of the contribution of symbiotic N2 fixation to plant N. J Exp Bot 53:1109–1118 ISSI 0022–0957
Westermann DT, Porter LK, O’Deen WA (1985) Nitrogen partition and mobilization patterns in bean plants. Crop Sci 25:225–229
Wolyn DJ, Clair DAS, DuBois J, Rosas JC, Burris RH, Bliss FA (1991) Distribution of nitrogen in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes selected for differences in nitrogen fixation ability. Plant Soil 138:303–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012256
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the support of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the CGIAR research program on grain legumes for financial support. We thank Drs. Mariela Rivera and Jose Polania for their valuable comments and suggestions. We also thank Neuza Asakawa, Cesar Cajiao, and bean breeding and physiology teams at CIAT, Colombia for their contribution to this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare to have no conflict of interest in this work.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Euan K. James.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Barbosa, N., Portilla, E., Buendia, H.F. et al. Genotypic differences in symbiotic nitrogen fixation ability and seed yield of climbing bean. Plant Soil 428, 223–239 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3665-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3665-y