Abstract
The models we use, habitually, to describe quantum nonlinear optical processes have been remarkably successful, yet, with few exceptions, they each contain a mathematical flaw. We present this flaw, show how it can be fixed, and, in the process, suggest why we can continue to use our favored Hamiltonians.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
S. Stenholm circa (1986) private communication. His statement, if I remember correctly, was “Does it bother you that your Hamiltonian has a spectrum that is unbounded from below?” The very same question was posed soon afterwards, also, by K. Rzążewski after the presentation of a conference paper.
W. H. Louisell, Radiation and Noise in Quantum Electronics, McGraw-Hill, New York (1964).
J. Peřina, Quantum Statistics of Linear and Nonlinear Optical Phenomena, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1991).
P. Meystre and D. F. Walls (Eds.), Nonclassical Effects in Quantum Optics, American Institute of Physics, New York (1991). This is a reprint collection of important early papers in quantum optics, many of them dealing with quantum nonlinear optics.
D. F. Walls and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Optics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1994).
L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics, Cambridge University Press (1995).
M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics, Cambridge University Press (1997).
S. M. Barnett and P. M. Radmore, Methods in Theoretical Quantum Optics, Oxford University Press (1997).
H.-A. Bachor, A Guide to Experiments in Quantum Optics, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim (1998).
R. Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press (2000).
H. J. Carmichael, Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics, Springer, Berlin (2008), Vol. 2.
R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics, 3rd ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam (2008).
G. New, Introduction to Nonlinear Optics, Cambridge University Press (2011).
R. Bonifacio and G. Preparata, Lett. Nuovo Cimento, 1, 887 (1969).
D. F. Walls and R. Barakat, Phys. Rev. A, 1, 446 (1970).
S. M. Barnett and P. L. Knight, Opt. Acta, 31, 435 (1984); Erratum: 31 1203 (1984).
A. Yariv, Quantum Electronics, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York (1975).
M. Schubert and B. Wilhelmi, Nonlinear Optics and Quantum Electronics, Wiley, New York (1986).
P. N. Butcher and D. Cotter, The Elements of Nonlinear Optics, Cambridge University Press (1990).
A. G. Newell and J. V. Moloney, Nonlinear Optics, Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA (1992).
P. Mandel P, Nonlinear Optics, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim (2010).
S. P. Krinitzky and D. T. Pegg, Phys. Rev. A, 33, 403 (1986).
S. J. Buckle, S. M. Barnett, P. L. Knight, et al., J. Mod. Opt., 33, 1129 (1986).
B. W. Shore, The Theory of Coherent Atomic Excitation: Vol. 2, Multilevel Atoms and Incoherence, Wiley, New York (1990).
Z. Ficek and S. Swain, Quantum Interference and Coherence, Springer, New York (2004).
S. Stenholm and K.-A. Suominen, Quantum Approach to Informatics, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ (2005).
B. W. Shore, Manipulating Quantum Structures Using Laser Pulses, Cambridge University Press (2011).
D. J. Klein, J. Chem. Phys., 61, 786 (1974).
C. E. Soliverez, Phys. Rev. A, 24, 4 (1981).
D. Bohm, Quantum Theory, Prentice-Hall, New York (1951); reprinted by Dover, New York (1989).
R. H. Dicke and J. P. Wittke, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA (1960).
E. Merzbacher, Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York (1970).
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford (1977).
M.-A. Dupertuis, S. M. Barnett, and S. Stenholm, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B., 4, 1102 (1987).
M.-A. Dupertuis, S. M. Barnett, and S. Stenholm, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B., 4, 1124 (1987).
C. R. Gilson, S. M. Barnett, and S. Stenholm, J. Mod. Opt., 34, 949 (1987).
S. M. Barnett, S. Stenholm, and D. T. Pegg, Opt. Commun., 73, 314 (1989).
S. M. Barnett and S. Stenholm, J. Mod. Opt., 47, 2869 (2000).
S. Franke-Arnold, E. Andersson, S. M. Barnett, and S. Stenholm, Phys. Rev. A, 63, 052301 (2001).
S. M. Barnett and S. Stenholm, Phys. Rev. A, 64, 033808 (2001).
J. Salo, S. M. Barnett, and S. Stenholm, Opt. Commun., 259, 772 (2006).
S. Croke, S. M. Barnett, and S. Stenholm, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.), 323, 893 (2008).
S. M. Barnett and S. Stenholm, “Causal interpretation of quantum mechanics: an alternative to Bohmian mechanics,” Unpublished note (2009).
S. Stenholm, The Quest for Reality, Oxford University Press (2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barnett, S.M. Is there a Problem with our Hamiltonians for Quantum Nonlinear Optical Processes?. J Russ Laser Res 39, 318–324 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10946-018-9725-1
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10946-018-9725-1