Abstract
A total coloring of a graph G is a coloring such that no two adjacent or incident elements receive the same color. In this field there is a famous conjecture, named Total Coloring Conjecture, saying that the the total chromatic number of each graph G is at most \(\Delta +2\). Let G be a planar graph with maximum degree \(\Delta \ge 7\) and without adjacent chordal 6-cycles, that is, two cycles of length 6 with chord do not share common edges. In this paper, it is proved that the total chromatic number of G is \(\Delta +1\), which partly confirmed Total Coloring Conjecture.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
All graphs considered in this paper are simple, finite and undirected, and we follow Bondy and Murty (1976) for the terminologies and notations not defined here. A k -total-coloring of a graph G is a coloring of \(V\cup {E}\) using k colors such that no two adjacent or incident elements receive the same color. A graph G is k -total-colorable if it admits a k-total-coloring. The total chromatic number \(\chi ''(G)\) of G is the smallest integer k such that G is k-total-colorable. Clearly, \(\chi ''(G)\ge \Delta +1\), where \(\Delta \) denotes the maximum degree of G. The Total Coloring Conjecture (TCC) is a well-studied problem in graph theory, which is posed by Behzad (1965) and Vizing (1968) independently.
Conjecture 1
(TCC) For every graph G, we have \(\Delta +1\le \chi ''(G)\le \Delta +2\).
TCC is confirmed for graphs with \(\Delta \le 5\) (Kostochka 1996). For planar graphs, the remaining open case is just that \(\Delta =6\) (Sanders and Zhao 1999). Interestingly, the total chromatic number \(\chi ''(G)\) of planar graphs with large maximum degree can be determined. Until now, the best known result for planar graphs is that \(\chi ''(G)=\Delta +1\) for \(\Delta \ge 9\). Some other related results can be found in Cai et al. (2016), Chang et al. (2011), Hou et al. (2011), Li et al. (2015), Liu et al. (2009), Qu et al. (2016), Qu et al. (2015), Wang and Wu (2011), Wang et al. (2014), and Wang et al. (2015).
In the following, we just consider planar graphs G with \(\Delta \ge 7\). Wang et al. (2014) proved that if G has no 6-cycles with chords, then \(\chi ''(G)=\Delta +1\). In this paper, we obtain the following result.
Theorem 2
Suppose G is a planar graph without adjacent chordal 6-cycles. If \(\Delta \ge 7\), then \(\chi ''(G)=\Delta +1\).
Now we introduce some more notations and definitions here for convenience. Let G be a planar graph which is embedded on the plane. For a vertex v of G, the degree d(v) is the number of edges incident with v; and for a face f of G, the degree d(f) is the length of the boundary walk of f, where each cut-edge is counted twice. A k -vertex, \(k^{-}\) -vertex or \(k^{+}\) -vertex is a vertex of degree k, at most k or at leat k, respectively. Similarly, we can define a k -face, \(k^{-}\) -face and \(k^{+}\) -face. We say that two cycles are intersecting if they share at least one common vertex, and adjacent if they share at least one common edge. Denote by \(n_{d}(v)\) the number of d-vertices adjacent to the vertex v, by \(n_{d}(f)\) the number of d-vertices incident with the face f, and by \(f_{d}(v)\) the number of d-faces incident with the vertex v.
2 Proof of Theorem 2
In Wang et al. (2016), Theorem 2 was proved for \(\Delta \ge 8\). So we assume \(\Delta =7\) in the following. Let \(G=(V,E,F)\) be a minimal counterexample to Theorem 2 in terms of the number of vertices and edges. That is, every proper subgraph of G is 8-total-colorable, but not G. So G is 2-connected, and the boundary of each face in G is exactly a cycle, i.e., the boundary walk of each face cannot pass though a vertex v more than once. We first show some known properties of G.
(i) If \(uv \in E(G)\) with \(d(u)\le 4\), then \(d(v)\ge 9-d(u)\) (see Borodin 1989; Wang and Wu 2004).
(ii) The subgraph \(G_{27}\) of G induced by all edges joining 2-vertices to 7-vertices is a forest (see Borodin 1989).
(iii) If v is a 7-vertex of G with \(n_2(v)\ge 1\), then \(n_{4^+}(v)\ge 1\) (see Chang et al. 2011).
(iv) G has no configurations depicted in Fig. 1 where the vertices marked by \(\bullet \) have no other neighbors in G (see Borodin et al. 1997; Liu et al. 2009; Shen and Wang 2009; Wang 2007).
Lemma 1
(Kostochka 1996) Suppose that v is a 7-vertex and that \(v_{1}, v_{2}, \cdots , v_{k}\) are consecutive neighbors of v with \(d(v_{1})=d(v_{k})=2\) and \(d(v_{i})\ge 3\) for \(2\le i\le k-1\), where \(k\in \{3, 4, 5, 6\}\). If the face incident with \(v, v_{i}, v_{i+1}\) is a 4-face for all \(1\le i\le k-1\), then at least one vertex in \(\{v_{2}, v_{3}, \cdots , v_{k-1}\}\) is a \(4^{+}\)-vertex.
Lemma 2
(Wang and Wu 2011) Let \(u, v_{1}, v_{2}, \cdots , v_{k}\) be neighbors of v with \(d(u)=d(v_{1})=2, d(v_{k})\ge 5\), \(v_{1}, v_{2}, \cdots , v_{k}\) are consecutive neighbors of v, and \(d(v_{i})\ge 3\) for \(2\le i\le k\), where \(k\in \{3, 4, 5, 6\}\). If the face incident with \(v, v_{i}, v_{i+1}\) is a 4-face \(vv_{i}x_{i}v_{i+1}\) for any \(1\le i\le k-2\), and the face incident with \(v,v_{k-1},v_{k}\) is a 3-face, then at least one vertex in \(\{v_{1}, v_{2}, \cdots , v_{k-1}\}\) is a \(4^{+}\)-vertex.
By the Euler’s formula \(|V|-|E|+|F|=2\), we have
We define the initial charge c(x) of \(x\in V\cup F\) to be \(c(v)=2d(v)-6\) if \(v\in V\) and \(c(f)=d(v)-6\) if \(f\in F\). It follows that \(\sum _{x\in V\cup F}c(x)=-12<0\). Now we design appropriate rules and redistribute weights accordingly. Note that any discharging procedure preserves the total charge of G. If we can define suitable discharging rules to charge the initial charge function c to the final function \(c'\) on \(x\in V\cup F\), such that \(c'(x)\ge 0\) for all \(x\in V\cup F\), then we get an obvious contradiction.
In the following we use \(c(x\rightarrow y)\) to denote the total charge from an element x to another element y. Our discharging rules are defined as follows.
- R1 :
-
. Let v be a 2-vertex, then v receives charge 1 from each of its adjacent vertices.
- R2 :
-
. Let v be a 4-vertex and f be a k-face incident with v. Then
- (1):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=\frac{1}{5}\), if \(k=5\);
- (2):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=\frac{1}{2}\), if \(k=4\);
- (3):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=\frac{1}{2}\), if \(k=3\) and \(f_{3}(v)=4\);
- (4):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=\frac{2}{3}\), if \(k=3\) and \(f_{3}(v)=3\);
- (5):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=\frac{3}{4}\), if \(k=3\), \(f_{3}(v)=2\) and \(f_{6^+}(v)\le 1\);
- (6):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=1\), if \(k=3\), \(f_{3}(v)=2\) and \(f_{6^+}(v)=2\);
- (7):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=\frac{3}{4}\), if \(k=3\), \(f_{3}(v)=1\), \(f_{4}(v)=2\) and \(f_5(v)=1\);
- (8):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=1\), if \(k=3\), \(f_{3}(v)=1\), \(f_{4}(v)=2\) and \(f_5(v)=0\);
- (9):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=1\), if \(k=3\), \(f_{3}(v)=1\), \(f_{4}(v)\le 1\).
- R3 :
-
. Let v be a 5-vertex and f be a k-face incident with v. If f is incident with a 4-vertex, then let this 4-vertex be u. Then
- (1):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=\frac{1}{5}\), if \(k=5\);
- (2):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=\frac{1}{2}\), if \(k=4\);
- (3):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=1\), if \(k=3\) and \(f_{3}(v)=4\);
- (4):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=1\), if \(k=3\) and \(n_{4}(f)=0\);
- (5):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=\frac{5}{4}\), if \(k=3\), \(n_{4}(f)=1\) and \(f_3(u)\ge 3\);
- (6):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=\frac{5}{4}\), if \(k=3\), \(n_{4}(f)=1\), \(f_3(u)=2\) and \(f_{6^+}(u)\le 1\);
- (7):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=1\), if \(k=3\), \(n_{4}(f)=1\), \(f_3(u)=2\) and \(f_{6^+}(u)=2\);
- (8):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=\frac{5}{4}\), if \(k=3\), \(n_{4}(f)=1\) and \(f_3(u)=1\), \(f_4(u)=2\), \(f_5(u)=1\);
- (9):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=1\), if \(k=3\), \(n_{4}(f)=1\) and \(f_3(u)=1\), \(f_4(u)=2\), \(f_5(u)=0\);
- (10):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=1\), if \(k=3\), \(n_{4}(f)=1\) and \(f_3(u)=1\), \(f_4(u)\le 1\).
- R4 :
-
. Let v be a 6-vertex or 7-vertex and f be a k-face incident with v. If f is incident with a 4-vertex, then let this 4-vertex be u. Then
- (1):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=\frac{1}{8}\), if \(d(v)=7\), \(k=6\) and it appears in Fig. 2(1);
- (2):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=\frac{7}{16}\), if \(k=5\) and it appears in Fig. 2(2);
- (3):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=\frac{1}{8}\), if \(k=5\) and it appears in Fig. 2(2);
- (4):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=\frac{1}{3}\), if \(k=5\) and it not appears in Fig. 2(2);
- (5):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=1\), if \(k=4\) and \(n_{3^-}(f)=2\);
- (6):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=\frac{3}{4}\), if \(k=4\), \(n_{3^-}(f)=1\) and \(n_{5^-}(f)=2\);
- (7):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=\frac{2}{3}\), if \(k=4\), \(n_{3^-}(f)=1\) and \(n_{5^-}(f)\le 1\);
- (8):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=\frac{1}{2}\), if \(k=4\) and \(n_{3^-}(f)=0\);
- (9):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=\frac{3}{2}\), if \(k=3\) and \(n_{3^-}(f)=1\);
- (10):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=\frac{5}{4}\), if \(k=3\), \(n_{4}(f)=1\) and \(f_3(u)\ge 3\);
- (11):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=\frac{5}{4}\), if \(k=3\), \(n_{4}(f)=1\), \(f_3(u)=2\) and \(f_{6^+}(u)\le 1\);
- (12):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=1\), if \(k=3\), \(n_{4}(f)=1\), \(f_3(u)=2\) and \(f_{6^+}(u)=2\);
- (13):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=\frac{5}{4}\), if \(k=3\), \(n_{4}(f)=1\) and \(f_3(u)=1\), \(f_4(u)=2\), \(f_5(u)=1\);
- (14):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=1\), if \(k=3\), \(n_{4}(f)=1\) and \(f_3(u)=1\), \(f_4(u)=2\), \(f_5(u)=0\);
- (15):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=1\), if \(k=3\), \(n_{4}(f)=1\) and \(f_3(u)=1\), \(f_4(u)\le 1\);
- (16):
-
\(c(v\rightarrow f)=1\), if \(k=3\) and \(n_{4^-}(f)=0\).
- R5 :
-
. Let f be a 6-face and v be a 7-vertex incident with f. If it appears in Fig. 2(1), then \(c(f\rightarrow v)=\frac{1}{4}\).
- R6 :
-
. Let f be a \(7^{+}\)-face and v be a 7-vertex incident with f. If it appears in Fig. 2(3), then \(c(f\rightarrow v)=\frac{1}{2}\).
In the following, we will check that \(c'(x)\ge 0\) holds for all \(x\in V\cup F\) which will be the desired contradiction.
Let \(v_{i}\) be the neighbor of v and \(f_{i}\) be the face incident with v for \(i=1,2,\cdots ,d(v)\) in anticlockwise order, where \(v_{i}\) is incident with \(f_{i-1}\) and \(f_{i}\) (\(i=1,2,\cdots ,d(v)\)). Note that eventually \(f_{0}\) and \(f_{d(v)}\) denote the same face.
First, we consider the final charge of faces. Let f be a face of G. Suppose \(d(f)\ge 7\). Then \(n_{2}(f)\le \lfloor \frac{d(f)-1}{2}\rfloor \). So \(c'(f)\ge c(f)-\frac{1}{2}\times (\lfloor \frac{d(f)-1}{2}\rfloor -1)\ge 0\) by R6. Suppose \(d(f)=6\). Then \(c(f)=0\) and \(c'(f)\ge 0-\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{8}\times 2=0\) by R4-1 and R5. Suppose \(d(f)=5\). Then \(c(f)=-1\) and \(n_{3^-}(f)\le 2\). If \(n_{3^-}(f)=2\), then \(c'(f)\ge -1+\frac{1}{8}+\frac{7}{16}\times 2=0\) by R4-2,3. If \(n_{3^-}(f)=1\), then \(c'(f)\ge -1+\frac{1}{3}\times 2+\frac{1}{5}\times 2=\frac{1}{15}>0\) by R2-1, R3-1 and R4-4. If \(n_{3^-}(f)=0\), then \(c'(f)\ge -1+\frac{1}{5}\times 5=0\) by R2-1 and R3-1. Suppose \(d(f)=4\). Then \(c(f)=-2\) and \(n_{3^-}(f)\le 2\). If \(n_{3^-}(f)=2\), then \(c'(f)\ge -2+1\times 2=0\) by R4-5. If \(n_{3^-}(f)=1\) and \(n_{5^-}(f)=2\), then \(c'(f)\ge -2+\frac{3}{4}\times 2+\frac{1}{2}=0\) by R2-2, R3-2 and R4-6. If \(n_{3^-}(f)=1\) and \(n_{5^-}(f)\le 1\), then \(c'(f)\ge -2+\frac{2}{3}\times 3=0\) by R4-7. If \(n_{3^-}(f)=0\), then \(c'(f)\ge -2+\frac{1}{2}\times 4=0\) by R2-2, R3-2 and R4-8. Suppose \(d(f)=3\). Then \(c(f)=-3\) and \(n_{3^-}(f)\le 1\). If \(n_{3^-}(f)=1\), then \(c'(f)\ge -3+\frac{3}{2}\times 2=0\) by R4-9. If \(n_{3^-}(f)=0\) and \(n_{4^-}(f)=1\), then \(c'(f)\ge -3+\min \{\frac{5}{4}\times 2+\frac{3}{4}, \frac{5}{4}\times 2+\frac{2}{3}, \frac{5}{4}\times 2+\frac{1}{2}, 1\times 3\}=0\). If \(n_{3^-}(f)=0\) and \(n_{4^-}(f)=0\), then \(c'(f)\ge -3+1\times 3=0\) by R3-4 and R4-16.
Second, we consider the final charge of vertices. There are two useful lemmas as follows.
Lemma 3
(Wang and Wu 2011) Suppose that \(d(v_{1})=d(v_{k})=2\), and \(d(v_{j})\ge 3\) for \(j=2,3, \cdots , k-1\). If \(f_{1}, f_{2}, \cdots , f_{k-1}\) are \(4^{+}\)-faces, then v sends in total at most \(\frac{3}{2}+(k-3)\) to \(f_{1}, f_{2}, \cdots , f_{k-1}\).
Lemma 4
(Wang et al. 2016) Suppose that \(d(v_{1})=d(v_{k})=2\), and \(d(v_{j})\ge 3\) for \(j=2,3, \cdots , k-1\). If \(\min \{d(f_{2}), d(f_{3}), \cdots , d(f_{k-2})\}\ge 3\), then v sends in total at most \(\frac{3}{2}+\frac{5}{4}\times (k-3)\) to \(f_{1}, f_{2}, \cdots , f_{k-1}\).
Let \(v\in V\). Note that G has no vertex of degree one by (i). If \(d(v)=2\), then \(c(v)=-2\) and \(c'(v)= -2+1\times 2=0\) by R1. If \(d(v)=3\), then clearly \(c'(v)= c(v)=0\). In the following, it suffices to check that \(c'(v)\ge 0\) for all \(4^{+}\)-vertices of G.
Let v be a 4-vertex. We have \(c(v)=2\), \(n_{4^-}(v)=0\) and \(f_3(v)\le 4\). If \(f_3(v)=4\), then \(c'(v)=2-\frac{1}{2}\times 4=0\) by R2-3. If \(f_3(v)=3\), then \(f_{6^{+}}(v)\ge 1\). So \(c'(v)=2-\frac{2}{3}\times 3=0\) by R2-4. If \(f_3(v)=2\), then \(f_4(v)\le 1\) and the two \(4^{+}\)-faces incident with v can not be both 5-faces. If one of the \(4^{+}\)-faces is a 4-face, then the other \(4^{+}\)-face must be a \(6^{+}\)-face. So \(c'(v)\ge 2-\max \{\frac{3}{4}\times 2+\frac{1}{2},\frac{3}{4}\times 2+\frac{1}{5}, 1\times 2\}=0\) by R2-5,6. If \(f_3(v)=1\), then \(f_4(v)\le 2\). If \(f_4(v)=2\), then \(c'(v)\ge 2-\max \{\frac{3}{4}+\frac{1}{2}\times 2+\frac{1}{5}, 1+\frac{1}{2}\times 2\}=0\) by R2-7,8. If \(f_4(v)\le 1\), then \(c'(v)\ge 2-1-\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{5}\times 2=\frac{1}{10}>0\) by R2-9. If \(f_3(v)=0\), then \(c'(v)\ge 2-\frac{1}{2}\times 4=0\).
Let v be a 5-vertex. We have \(c(v)=4\), \(n_{3^-}(v)=0\) and \(f_3(v)\le 4\). If \(f_3(v)=4\), then \(f_{6^{+}}(v)\ge 1\). So \(c'(v)=4-1\times 4=0\) by R3-3. Suppose \(f_3(v)=3\). If all the 3-faces incident with v are \((4,5^{+},5)\)-faces, then \(f_{6^+}(v)\ge 2\) by Wang et al. (2014). So \(c'(v)\ge 4-\frac{5}{4}\times 3=\frac{1}{4}>0\). Otherwise, one of the 3-faces incident with v is a \((5^{+},5^{+},5)\)-face, then \(f_4(v)\le 1\). If one of the \(4^{+}\)-faces is a 4-face, then the other \(4^{+}\)-face must be a \(6^{+}\)-face. So \(c'(v)\ge 4-\frac{5}{4}\times 2-1-\max \{\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{5}\times 2\}=0\). If \(f_3(v)\le 2\), then \(c'(v)\ge 4-\frac{5}{4}\times f_3(v)-\frac{1}{2}\times [5-f_3(v)]\ge 0\).
Let v be a 6-vertex. We have \(c(v)=6\), \(n_{2}(v)=0\) and \(f_3(v)\le 4\). If \(f_3(v)=4\), then \(f_{6^{+}}(v)\ge 2\). So \(c'(v)=6-\frac{3}{2}\times 4=0\). If \(f_3(v)=3\), then \(f_4(v)\le 1\). So \(c'(v)\ge 6-\max \{\frac{3}{2}\times 2+\frac{5}{4}+\frac{2}{3},\frac{3}{2}+\frac{5}{4}\times 2+\frac{3}{4}, \frac{5}{4}\times 3+1\}-\frac{7}{16}\times 2=\frac{5}{24}>0\). If \(f_3(v)=2\), then \(f_4(v)\le 3\). If \(f_4(v)=3\), then \(c'(v)\ge 6-\max \{\frac{3}{2}+\frac{5}{4}+\frac{3}{4}+\frac{2}{3}\times 2, \frac{5}{4}\times 2+\frac{3}{4}\times 3\}-\frac{7}{16}=\frac{35}{48}>0\). If \(f_4(v)\le 2\), then \(c'(v)=6-\frac{3}{2}\times 2-1\times 2-\frac{7}{16}\times 2=\frac{1}{8}>0\). If \(f_3(v)=1\), then \(f_4(v)\le 3\). So \(c'(v)\ge 6-\frac{3}{2}-1\times 3-\frac{7}{16}\times 2=\frac{5}{8}>0\). If \(f_3(v)=0\), then \(c'(v)\ge 6-1\times 6=0\).
Let v be a 7-vertex. We have \(c(v)=8\), \(n_{2}(v)\le 6\) and \(f_3(v)\le 4\). So it suffices to consider the following cases.
Case 1 \(n_{2}(v)=6\). Then \(n_{3}(v)=0\), \(f_3(v)=0\) and \(f_{6^{+}}(v)\ge 5\) by (iv). So \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 6-\frac{3}{2}=\frac{1}{2}>0\) by R1 and Lemma 4.
Case 2 \(n_{2}(v)=5\). Then \(n_{3}(v)\le 1\) and there are three possibilities in which 2-vertices are located. They are shown as configurations in Fig. 3, where the vertices marked by \(\bullet \) are 2-vertices. For Fig. 3(1), we have \(f_{3}(v)\le 1\) and \(f_{6^{+}}(v)\ge 4\). So \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 5-(\frac{3}{2}+\frac{5}{4})=\frac{1}{4}>0\) by Lemma 4. For Fig. 3(2) and 3(3), we have \(f_{3}(v)=0\) and \(f_{6^{+}}(v)\ge 3\). So \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 5-\frac{3}{2}\times 2=0\) by Lemma 4.
Case 3 \(n_{2}(v)=4\). Then \(n_{3}(v)\le 2\). For Fig. 3(4), \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 4-(\frac{3}{2}+\frac{5}{4}\times 2)=0\). For Fig. 3(5) and (6), we have \(f_3(v)\le 1\) and \(f_{6^{+}}(v)\ge 2\). So \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 4-\frac{3}{2}-(\frac{3}{2}+\frac{5}{4})+\frac{1}{4}\times 2=\frac{1}{4}>0\) by R5. For Fig. 3(7), we have \(f_3(v)=0\), \(f_4(v)\le 4\) and \(f_{6^{+}}(v)\ge 1\). If \(f_4(v)=4\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 4-\max \{\frac{3}{2}\times 2+\frac{7}{16}\times 2, \frac{3}{2}+1\times 2+\frac{1}{8}\times 2\}=\frac{1}{8}>0\). If \(f_4(v)\le 3\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 4-\max \{\frac{3}{2}+1+\frac{1}{8}+\frac{7}{16}\times 2, 1\times 3+\frac{1}{8}\times 3\}=\frac{1}{2}>0\).
Case 4 \(n_{2}(v)=3\). For Fig. 3(8), we have \(f_3(v)\le 3\) and \(f_{6^{+}}(v)\ge 2\). So \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 3-(\frac{3}{2}+\frac{5}{4}\times 3)+\frac{1}{4}\times 2=\frac{1}{4}>0\) by R5. For Fig. 3(9), we have \(f_3(v)\le 2\) and \(f_{6^{+}}(v)\ge 1\). If \(f_3(v)=0\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 3-(\frac{3}{2}+2)-\frac{3}{2}=0\) by Lemma 3. If \(f_3(v)=1\), then \(f_4(v)\le 4\). If the 3-face is a \((3,6^{+},7)\)-face, then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 3-\max \{\frac{3}{2}\times 2+1+\frac{2}{3}+\frac{1}{8}, \frac{3}{2}+1+\frac{3}{4}\times 2+\frac{2}{3}+\frac{1}{8}\}=\frac{5}{24}>0\) by (iv). Otherwise, \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 3-\frac{5}{4}-1\times 2-\frac{3}{4}\times 2-\frac{1}{8}=\frac{1}{8}>0\). If \(f_3(v)=2\), then \(f_{2}\) and \(f_{5}\) can not be both 4-faces. So \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 3-\max \{\frac{3}{2}\times 3+\frac{1}{8}\times 2, \frac{3}{2}\times 2+\frac{5}{4}+\frac{3}{4}+\frac{1}{8}\}+\frac{1}{4}=\frac{1}{8}>0\) by R5. For Fig. 3(10), we have \(f_3(v)\le 2\) and \(f_{6^{+}}(v)\ge 1\). If \(f_3(v)=0\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 3-(\frac{3}{2}+1)\times 2=0\). If \(f_3(v)=1\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 3-(\frac{3}{2}+1)-\max \{\frac{3}{2}+\frac{2}{3}+\frac{1}{8}, \frac{5}{4}+\frac{3}{4}\times 2\}+\frac{1}{4}=0\) by Lemma 2. If \(f_3(v)=2\), then \(f_4(v)\le 4\). If \(f_4(v)=4\), then \(f_{1}\) is a \(7^{+}\)-face. So \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 3-(\frac{5}{4}+\frac{3}{4}\times 2)\times 2+\frac{1}{2}=0\) by R6. If \(f_4(v)\le 3\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 3-\frac{5}{4}-\frac{3}{4}\times 2-\max \{\frac{3}{2}+\frac{2}{3}+\frac{1}{8}, \frac{5}{4}+\frac{3}{4}+\frac{7}{16}\}+\frac{1}{4}=\frac{1}{16}>0\). For Fig. 3(11), we have \(f_3(v)\le 1\) and \(f_4(v)\le 4\). If \(f_3(v)=0\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 3-\max \{1\times 4+\frac{1}{8}\times 3, \frac{3}{2}+1\times 2+\frac{7}{16}+\frac{1}{8}\times 2\}=\frac{5}{8}>0\). If \(f_3(v)=1\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 3-\max \{\frac{5}{4}+\frac{3}{4}\times 2+2\times \max \{1+\frac{1}{8}, \frac{3}{4}+\frac{1}{3}, \frac{2}{3}+\frac{7}{16}\}, \frac{3}{2}\times 2+1+\frac{2}{3}+\frac{1}{8}, \frac{3}{2}+\frac{5}{4}+1+\frac{3}{4}+\frac{1}{8}\}=0\).
Case 5 \(n_{2}(v)=2\). For Fig. 3(12), we have \(f_3(v)\le 4\) and \(f_{5^{+}}(v)\ge 1\). If \(f_3(v)=0\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 2-(\frac{3}{2}+4)=\frac{1}{2}>0\). If \(f_3(v)=1\), then \(f_4(v)\le 4\). So \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 2-\frac{3}{2}-1\times 3-\frac{1}{8}-\max \{1+\frac{1}{8}, \frac{3}{4}+\frac{1}{3}, \frac{2}{3}+\frac{7}{16}\}=\frac{1}{4}>0\). Suppose \(f_3(v)=2\). If \(f_{3}\) and \(f_{4}\) or \(f_{4}\) and \(f_{5}\) are 3-faces, then \(f_4(v)\le 2\). So \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 2-\frac{3}{2}\times 2-1\times 2-\frac{7}{16}\times 2-\frac{1}{8}=0\). Otherwise, \(f_4(v)\le 4\). If \(f_4(v)\le 2\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 2-\frac{3}{2}\times 2-1\times 2-\frac{7}{16}\times 2-\frac{1}{8}=0\). Otherwise, \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 2-\max \{\frac{3}{2}\times 2+\frac{1}{8}+\max \{1+\frac{2}{3}\times 2+\frac{1}{8}, \frac{3}{4}\times 2+\frac{2}{3}+\frac{7}{16}\}, \frac{3}{2}+\frac{5}{4}+\frac{1}{8}+\max \{1+\frac{3}{4}\times 2+\frac{1}{8}, 1+\frac{3}{4}+\frac{2}{3}+\frac{7}{16}, \frac{3}{4}\times 3+\frac{1}{3}\}, \frac{5}{4}\times 2+1+\frac{3}{4}\times 2+\frac{7}{16}+\frac{1}{8}\}=\frac{13}{48}>0\). If \(f_3(v)=3\), then \(f_4(v)\le 2\). So \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 2-\max \{\frac{3}{2}\times 3+\frac{2}{3}+\frac{1}{8}\times 3, \frac{3}{2}\times 2+\frac{5}{4}+\max \{1+\frac{1}{8}\times 3, \frac{3}{4}+\frac{2}{3}+\frac{1}{8}\times 2\}, \frac{3}{2}+\frac{5}{4}\times 2+1+\frac{3}{4}+\frac{1}{8}\times 2, \frac{5}{4}\times 3+1\times 2+\frac{1}{8}\times 2\}=0\). If \(f_3(v)=4\), then \(f_{6^{+}}(v)\ge 2\). So \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 2-\frac{3}{2}\times 2-\frac{5}{4}\times 2-\frac{1}{8}\times 3=\frac{1}{8}>0\). For Fig. 3(13), we have \(f_3(v)\le 3\). If \(f_3(v)=0\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 2-\frac{3}{2}-(\frac{3}{2}+3)=0\). If \(f_3(v)=1\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 2-\frac{3}{2}\times 2-1\times 2-\frac{2}{3}-\frac{1}{8}=\frac{5}{24}>0\). Suppose \(f_3(v)=2\). If \(f_{3}\) and \(f_{4}\) are 3-faces, then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 2-\frac{3}{2}\times 3-\frac{1}{8}-\max \{1+\frac{1}{8}, \frac{3}{4}+\frac{1}{3}, \frac{2}{3}+\frac{7}{16}\}=\frac{1}{4}>0\). Otherwise, \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 2-\max \{\frac{3}{2}\times 3+\frac{2}{3}+\frac{7}{16}+\frac{1}{8}, \frac{5}{4}\times 2+\frac{3}{4}\times 2+\max \{1+\frac{3}{4}+\frac{1}{8}, \frac{2}{3}+\frac{7}{16}\times 2\}\}=\frac{1}{8}>0\). If \(f_3(v)=3\), then \(f_4(v)\le 2\). So \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 2-\max \{\frac{3}{2}\times 3+1+\frac{1}{8}\times 2, \frac{3}{2}+\frac{5}{4}\times 2+1+\frac{3}{4}+\frac{1}{8}\times 2\}=0\). For Fig. 3(14), we have \(f_3(v)\le 3\). If \(f_3(v)=0\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 2-(\frac{3}{2}+1)-(\frac{3}{2}+2)=0\). If \(f_3(v)=1\), then \(f_4(v)\le 4\). If \(f_4(v)=4\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 2-\max \{\frac{3}{2}+1\times 3+\frac{2}{3}+\frac{1}{8}\times 2, \frac{5}{4}+1\times 2+\frac{3}{4}\times 2+\frac{7}{16}\times 2\}=\frac{3}{8}>0\). If \(f_4(v)\le 3\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 2-\frac{3}{2}-1\times 3-\frac{7}{16}\times 3=\frac{3}{16}>0\). Suppose \(f_3(v)=2\). If \(f_{3}\) and \(f_{4}\) are 3-faces, then \(f_4(v)\le 2\). If \(f_4(v)=2\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 2-\max \{\frac{3}{2}\times 2+1+\frac{1}{8}\times 2+\max \{1+\frac{1}{8}, \frac{3}{4}+\frac{1}{3}, \frac{2}{3}+\frac{7}{16}\}, \frac{3}{2}+\frac{5}{4}+\max \{1\times 2+\frac{7}{16}+\frac{1}{8}\times 2, 1+\frac{3}{4}+\frac{7}{16}\times 3\}, \frac{5}{4}\times 2+1\times 2+\frac{7}{16}\times 2+\frac{1}{8}\}=\frac{3}{16}>0\). If \(f_4(v)\le 1\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 2-\max \{\frac{3}{2}\times 2+1+\frac{1}{8}\times 2+\frac{7}{16}\times 2, \frac{3}{2}+\frac{5}{4}+1+\frac{7}{16}\times 4\}=\frac{1}{2}>0\). If \(f_{3}\) and \(f_{7}\) are 3-faces, then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 2-\max \{\frac{3}{2}\times 2+\frac{1}{8}\times 2+\max \{1+\frac{2}{3}\times 2, 1+\frac{2}{3}+\frac{7}{16}\}, \frac{3}{2}+\frac{5}{4}+\frac{7}{16}+\frac{1}{8}+\max \{1+\frac{3}{4}\times 2, 1+\frac{3}{4}+\frac{2}{3}\}, \frac{5}{4}\times 2+1+\frac{3}{4}\times 2+\frac{7}{16}\times 2\}=\frac{1}{8}>0\). If \(f_3(v)=3\), then \(f_4(v)\le 2\). If \(f_4(v)=2\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 2-\frac{3}{2}\times 2-\frac{5}{4}-\frac{3}{4}\times 2-\frac{1}{8}\times 2=0\). If \(f_4(v)\le 1\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1\times 2-\max \{\frac{3}{2}\times 3+\frac{2}{3}+\frac{1}{8}\times 3, \frac{3}{2}\times 2+\frac{5}{4}+\frac{3}{4}+\frac{7}{16}+\frac{1}{8}\times 2, \frac{3}{2}+\frac{5}{4}\times 2+\frac{3}{4}+\frac{7}{16}\times 2+\frac{1}{8}, \frac{5}{4}\times 3+\frac{3}{4}+\frac{7}{16}\times 3\}=\frac{3}{16}>0\).
Case 6 \(n_{2}(v)=1\). Then \(f_3(v)\le 5\). If \(f_3(v)=0\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1-1\times 7=0\). If \(f_3(v)=1\), then \(f_4(v)\le 4\). So \(c'(v)\ge 8-1-\frac{3}{2}-1\times 4-\frac{7}{16}\times 2=\frac{5}{8}>0\). If \(f_3(v)=2\), then \(f_4(v)\le 4\). If \(f_4(v)=4\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1-\frac{3}{2}\times 2-1\times 2-\frac{2}{3}\times 2-\frac{7}{16}=\frac{11}{48}>0\). If \(f_4(v)\le 3\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1-\frac{3}{2}\times 2-1\times 3-\frac{7}{16}\times 2=\frac{1}{8}>0\). If \(f_3(v)=3\), then \(f_4(v)\le 2\). If \(f_4(v)=2\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1-\frac{3}{2}\times 2-\frac{5}{4}-1\times 2-\frac{1}{8}\times 2=\frac{1}{2}>0\). If \(f_4(v)\le 1\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-1-\frac{3}{2}\times 3-1-\frac{7}{16}\times 3=\frac{3}{16}>0\). If \(f_3(v)=4\), then \(f_{6^{+}}(v)\ge 2\) or \(f_{5^{+}}(v)\ge 3\). So \(c'(v)\ge 8-1-max\{\frac{3}{2}\times 4+\frac{1}{8}\times 3, \frac{3}{2}\times 3+\frac{5}{4}+1+\frac{1}{8}\times 2, \frac{3}{2}\times 2+\frac{5}{4}\times 2+1+\frac{1}{8}\times 2\}=0\). If \(f_3(v)=5\), then \(f_{6^{+}}(v)\ge 2\). So \(c'(v)\ge 8-1-\frac{3}{2}-\frac{5}{4}\times 4-\frac{1}{8}\times 2=\frac{1}{4}>0\) by (iv).
Case 7 \(n_{2}(v)=0\). Then \(f_3(v)\le 5\). If \(f_3(v) \le 2\), then \(c'(v)\ge 8-\frac{3}{2}\times f_3(v)-1\times [7-f_3(v)]\ge 0\). If \(f_3(v)=3\), then \(f_4(v)\le 2\). So \(c'(v)\ge 8-\frac{3}{2}\times 3-1\times 2-\frac{7}{16}\times 2=\frac{5}{8}>0\). If \(f_3(v)=4\), then \(f_4(v)\le 1\). So \(c'(v)\ge 8-\frac{3}{2}\times 4-1-\frac{7}{16}\times 2=\frac{1}{8}>0\). If \(f_3(v)=5\), then \(f_{6^{+}}(v)\ge 2\). So \(c'(v)\ge 8-\frac{3}{2}\times 5=\frac{1}{2}>0\).
Hence we complete the proof of the theorem.
References
Bondy JA, Murty USR (1976) Graph theory with applications. MacMillan, London
Behzad M (1965) Graphs and their chromatic numbers. Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University
Borodin OV (1989) On the total coloring of planar graphs. J Reine Angew Math 394:180–185
Borodin OV, Kostochka AV, Woodall DR (1997) Total colorings of planar graphs with large maximum degree. J Graph Theory 26:53–59
Cai H, Wu JL, Sun L (2016) Total coloring of planar graphs without short cycles. J Comb Optim 31:1650–1664
Chang GJ, Hou JF, Roussel N (2011) Local condition for planar graphs of maximum degree 7 to be 8-totally colorable. Discret Appl Math 159:760–768
Du DZ, Shen L, Wang YQ (2009) Planar graphs with maximum degree 8 and without adjacent triangles are \(9\)-total-colorable. Discret Appl Math 157:6035–6043
Hou JF, Liu B, Liu GZ, Wu JL (2011) Total colorings of planar graphs without 6-cycles. Discret Appl Math 159:157–163
Kostochka AV (1996) The total chromatic number of any multigraph with maximum degree five is at most seven. Discret Math 162:199–214
Kowalik L, Sereni JS, S̆krekovski R (2008) Total-coloring of plane graphs with maximum degree nine. SIAM J Discret Math 22:1462–1479
Li H, Ding L, Liu B, Wang G (2015) Neighbor sum distinguishing total colorings of planar graphs. J Comb Optim 30:675–688
Liu B, Hou JF, Wu JL, Liu GZ (2009) Total colorings and list total colorings of planar graphs without intersecting 4-cycles. Discret Math 309:6035–6043
Qu C, Wang G, Wu J, Yu X (2016) On the neighbor sum distinguishing total coloring of planar graphs. Theor Comput Sci 609:162–170
Qu C, Wang G, Yan G, Yu X (2015) Neighbor sum distinguishing total choosability of planar graphs. J Comb Optim. doi:10.1007/s10878-015-9911-9
Sanders DP, Zhao Y (1999) On total 9-coloring planar graphs of maximum degree seven. J Graph Theory 31:67–73
Shen L, Wang YQ (2009) Total colorings of planar graphs with maximum degree at least 8. Sci China Ser A 52(8):1733–1742
Vizing VG (1968) Some unsolved problems in graph theory. Uspekhi Mat Nauk 23:117–134 (in Russian)
Wang B, Wu JL (2011) Total coloring of planar graphs with maximum degree seven and without intersecting 3-cycles. Discret Math 311:2025–2030
Wang B, Wu JL, Wang HJ (2014) Total coloring of planar graphs without chordal \(6\)-cycles. Discret Appl Math 171:116–121
Wang HJ, Liu B, Gu Y, Zhang X, Wu WL, Gao HW (2015) Total coloring of planar graphs without adjacent short cycles, J Comb Optim. doi:10.1007/s10878-015-9954-y
Wang HJ, Luo ZY, Liu B, Gu Y, Gao HW (2016) A note on the minimum total coloring of planar graphs. Acta Math Sin Engl Ser 32:967–974
Wang HJ, Wu LD, Wu WL, Pardalos PM, Wu JL (2014) Minimum total coloring of planar graph. J Glob Optim 60:777–791
Wang P, Wu JL (2004) A note on the total colorings of planar graphs without \(4\)-cycles. Discret Math 24:125–135
Wang W (2007) Total chromatic number of planar graphs with maximum degree ten. J Graph Theory 54:91–102
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11501316, 71171120, 71571108), State Scholarship Fund of China (201506335016), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015M570568, 2016T90607), Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (ZR2014AQ001, ZR2015GZ007, ZR2015FM023) and Qingdao Postdoctoral Application Research Project (2015170).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, H., Liu, B., Wang, X. et al. Total coloring of planar graphs without adjacent chordal 6-cycles. J Comb Optim 34, 257–265 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-016-0063-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-016-0063-3