Abstract
Geostatistical seismic inversion methods use stochastic sequential simulation as the model generation and perturbation technique. These stochastic simulation methods use a global variogram model to express the expected spatial continuity pattern of the subsurface elastic properties of interest. The conditioning to a single variogram model is not suitable for complex and non-stationary geological environments, resulting in poor inverted models unable to reproduce non-stationary features such as channels, folds, and faults. The proposed method uses a stochastic sequential simulation and co-simulation method able to cope with spatially varying information using local and independent variogram models. The information about the dip, azimuth, and ranges of the local variogram model is inferred directly from the observed data. First, local dip and azimuth structural volumes are computed from seismic attribute analysis. Then, local variogram models are fitted along the directions estimated from the previous step. This information is used as steering data during the inversion, acting as proxy of the true subsurface geological complexities. Application examples in synthetic and real datasets with complex geometries show the impact of using local anisotropy models in both the reproduction of the original seismic data and the reliability of the inverted models. The resulting inverted models show enhanced consistency, where small-to-large scale discontinuities and complex geometries are better reproduced, allowing reducing the spatial uncertainty associated with the subsurface properties. This work represents a step forward in integrating geological consistency into geostatistical seismic inversion, surpassing the limitation of using a single variogram model to reproduce complex geological patterns.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alvarez, P., Bolívar, F., Di Luca, M., Salinas, T.: Multiattribute rotation scheme: a tool for reservoir property prediction from seismic inversion attributes. Interpretation. 3(4), SAE9–SAE18 (2015)
Azevedo, L., Nunes, R., Correia, P., Soares, A., Guerreiro, L., Neto, G.S.: Integration of well data into geostatistical seismic amplitude variation with angle inversion for facies estimation. Geophysics. 80(6), M113–M128 (2015)
Azevedo, L., Soares, A.: Geostatistical Methods for Reservoir Geophysics. Advances in Oil and Gas Exploration & Production. Springer International Publishing (2017)
Azevedo, L., Nunes, R., Soares, A., Neto, G.S., Martins, T.S.: Geostatistical seismic amplitude-versus-angle inversion. Geophys. Prospect. 66(S1), 116–131 (2018)
Azevedo, L., Grana, D., Amaro, C.: Geostatistical rock physics AVA inversion. Geophys. J. Int. 216(3), 1728–1739 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy511
Bachrach, R.: Joint estimation of porosity and saturation using stochastic rock-physics modeling. Geophysics. 71(5), O53–O63 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2235991
Biver, P., Zaytsev, V., Allard, D., Wackernagel, H.: Geostatistics on unstructured grids, theoretical background, and applications. In: Geostatistics Valencia 2016 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46819-8_30
Bornard, R., Allo, F., Coléou, T., Freudenreich, Y., Caldwell, D. H., Hamman, J. G.: Petrophysical seismic inversion to determine more accurate and precise reservoir properties: SPE Europec/EAGE Annual Conference, SPE 94144 (2005)
Boisvert, J.B., Manchuk, J.G., Deutsch, C.V.: Kriging in the presence of locally varying anisotropy using non-Euclidean distances. Math. Geosci. 41, 585–601 (2009)
Boisvert, J.B., Deutsch, C.V.: Programs for kriging and sequential Gaussian simulation with locally varying anisotropy using non-Euclidean distances. Comput. Geosci. 37(4), 495–510 (2011)
Bortoli, L.J., Alabert, F., Haas, A., Journel, A.G.: Constraining stochastic images to seismic data. Geostatistics Tróia. 1, 325–337 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1739-5_27
Bosch, M.: Lithologic tomography: from plural geophysical data to lithology estimation. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 749–766 (1999)
Bosch, M., Mukerji, T., Gonzalez, E.: Seismic inversion for reservoir properties combining statistical rock physics and geostatistics: a review. Geophysics. 75, 75A165–75A176 (2010)
Buland, A., Omre, H.: Bayesian linearized AVO inversion. Geophysics. 68, 185–198 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1543206
Caeiro, M., Demyanov, V., Soares, A.: Optimized history matching with direct sequential image transforming for non-stationary reservoirs. Math. Geosci. 47, 975–994 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-015-9591-0
Chen, Q., Sidney, S.: Seismic attribute technology for reservoir forecasting and monitoring. Lead. Edge. 16, 445–456 (1997)
Chopra, S., Marfurt, K.J.: Seismic attributes – a historical perspective. Geophysics. 70(5), 3SO–28SO (2005)
Coléou, T., Allo, F., Bornard, R., Hamman, J., Caldwell, D.: Petrophysical seismic inversion, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1355–1358 (2005)
Deutsch, C., Journel. A.G.: GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and Users’ Guide. Oxford University Press. Volume 136, Issue 1, pp. 83–108 (1998)
Doyen, P.M.: Permeability, conductivity, and pore geometry of sandstone. J. Geophys. Res. 93(B7), 7729–7740 (1988)
Doyen, P. M., Guidish, T. M.: Seismic discrimination of lithology: a Monte Carlo approach, in R. E. Sheriff, ed., Reservoir Geophysics: SEG, 243–250 (1992)
Doyen, P. M., Den Boer, L. D.: Bayesian sequential Gaussian simulation of lithology with non-linear data: U.S. Patent 5,539,704 (1996)
Doyen, P.: Seismic Reservoir Characterization: an Earth Modelling Perspective. Constraints. EAGE (2007)
González, E.F., Mukerji, T., Mavko, G.: Seismic inversion combining rock physics and multiple-point geostatistics. Geophysics. 73(1), R11–R21 (2008)
Grana, D., Della Rossa, E.: Probabilistic petrophysical-properties estimation integrating statistical rock physics with seismic inversion. Geophysics. 75(3), (2010). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3386676
Grana, D., Fjeldstad, T., Omre, H.: Bayesian Gaussian mixture linear inversion for geophysical inverse problems. Math. Geosci. 49(4), 493–515 (2017)
Gunning, J., Glinsky, M.E.: Detection of reservoir quality using Bayesian seismic inversion. Geophysics. 72(3), R37–R49 (2007)
Haas, A., Dubrule, O.: Geostatistical inversion – a sequential method of stochastic reservoir modeling constrained by seismic data. First Break. 12, 561–569 (1994)
Horta, A., Caeiro, M., Nunes, R., Soares, A.: Simulation of continuous variables at meander structures: application to contaminated sediments of a lagoon. In: Atkinson, P., Lloyd, C. (eds.) GeoENV VII – Geostatistics for Environmental Applications, pp. 161–172. Springer, London (2010)
Iske, A., Randen, T.: Mathematical methods and modelling in hydrocarbon exploration and production. Mathematics in Industry. (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/b137702
Jullum, M., Kolbjørnsen, O.: A Gaussian based framework for Bayesian inversion of geophysical data to rock properties. Geophysics. 81(3), R75–R87 (2016)
Kemper, M., Gunning, J.: Joint impedance and facies inversion: seismic inversion redefined. First Break. 32, 89–95 (2014)
Lillah, M., Boisvert, J.B.: Inference of locally varying anisotropy fields from diverse data sources. Comput. Geosci. 82, 170–182 (2015)
Marfurt, K.J.: Robust estimates of 3D reflector dip and azimuth. Geophysics. 71(4), P29–P40 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2213049
Martin, R., Machuca-Mory, D., Leuangthong, O., Boisvert, J.B.: Non-stationary geostatistical modeling: a case study comparing LVA estimation frameworks. Nat. Resour. Res. 28, 291–307 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-018-9384-5
Mukerji, T., Avseth, P., Mavko, G., Takahashi, I., González, E.F.: Statistical rock physics: combining rock physics, information theory, and geostatistics to reduce uncertainty in seismic reservoir characterization. Lead. Edge. 20(3), 313–319 (2001)
Pereira, P., Nunes, R., Azevedo, L., Soares, A.: The impact of a priori elastic models into iterative geostatistical seismic inversion. J. Appl. Geophys. 170, 103850 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.103850
Plavnik, A., Sidorov, A.N.: Mapping the properties of geological objects with allowance for anisotropy based on the simulation of the deformation transformation. Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations. 10(5), 629–638 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070048218050095
Randen, T., Monsen, E., Signer, C., Abrahamsen, A., Hansen, J. O., Sæter, T., Schlaf, J., Sønneland, L.: Three-dimensional texture attributes for seismic data analysis, S.E.G. Expanded Abstracts, 19 (2000)
Rimstad, K., Omre, H.: Impact of rock-physics depth trends and Markov random fields on hierarchical Bayesian lithology/fluid prediction. Geophysics. 75(4), R93–R108 (2010)
Rimstad, K., Avseth, P., Omre, H.: Hierarchical Bayesian lithology/fluid prediction: a North Sea case study. Geophysics. 77, B69–B85 (2012)
Sams, M. S., Atkins, D., Siad, N., Parwito, E., van Riel, P.: Stochastic inversion for high resolution reservoir characterization in the central Sumatra basin: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 57260 (1999)
Soares, A.: Direct sequential simulation and cosimulation. Math. Geol. 33, 911–926 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012246006212
Soares, A., Diet, J. D., Guerreiro, L.: Stochastic inversion with a global perturbation method. Petroleum Geostatistics, EAGE, Cascais, Portugal (September 2007): 10–14 (2007)
Spikes, K., Mukerji, T., Dvorkin, J., Mavko, G.: Probabilistic seismic inversion based on rock-physics models. Geophysics. 72(5), R87–R97 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2760162
Stroet, C., Snepvangers, J.: Mapping curvilinear structures with local anisotropy kriging. Math. Geol. 37, 635–649 (2005)
Tarantola, A.: Inverse problem theory. SIAM (2005)
Turco, F., Azevedo, L., Herold, D.: Geostatistical interpolation of non-stationary seismic data. Comput. Geosci. 23, 665–682 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-019-9812-6
Vargas-Guzmán, J.A., Vargas-Murillo, B.: Functional decomposition kriging for embedding stochastic anisotropy. In: Geostatistics Valencia 2016 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46819-8_2
Xu, W.: Conditional curvilinear stochastic simulation using pixel-based algorithms. Math. Geol. 28(7), 937–949 (1996)
Yao, T., Calvert, C., Jones, T., Foreman, L., Bishop, G.: Conditioning geological models to local continuity azimuth in spectral simulation. Math. Geol. 39, 349–354 (2007)
Zaytsev, V., Biver, P., Wackernagel, H., Allard, D.: Change-of-support models on irregular grids for geostatistical simulation. Math. Geol. l48(4), 353–369 (2016)
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge Partex Oil & Gas for making this dataset available and for the permission to publish it. We also thank Schlumberger and CGG for the donation of the academic licenses of Petrel® and Geoview, respectively. The authors also acknowledge the two anonymous reviewers for their comments during the revision of this paper.
Funding
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the CERENA (strategic project FCT UID/ECI/04028/2019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pereira, P., Calçôa, I., Azevedo, L. et al. Iterative geostatistical seismic inversion incorporating local anisotropies. Comput Geosci 24, 1589–1604 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-020-09966-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-020-09966-1